Patent Grant
11839597
The present invention relates to modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate having improved pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, and to therapeutic uses thereof.
Narcolepsy is a devastating disabling condition. The cardinal symptoms are excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy (a sudden loss of muscle tone triggered by strong emotions, seen in approximately 60% of patients), hypnogogic hallucination (HH), sleep paralysis (SP), and disturbed nocturnal sleep (DNS). Other than EDS, DNS is the most common symptom seen among narcolepsy patients.
The diagnosis of narcolepsy rests in part on clinical grounds. When narcolepsy is suspected, it is standard practice to administer an overnight polysomnogram (PSG) followed by a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) to document the rapid eye movement (REM) abnormality that characterizes the disorder. On the MSLT a mean sleep latency less than or equal to 8 minutes and two or more sleep onset REM periods (SOREMPs) are required to confirm a diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 narcolepsy. It is also possible, but infrequently preferred, that narcolepsy be diagnosed by measuring hypocretin in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in cases where the PSG and/or MSLT is not completed. For these cases, a hypocretin concentration of less than 110 pg/nL confirms a narcolepsy Type 1 diagnosis.
One of the major treatments for narcolepsy is sodium oxybate, a neuroactive agent with a variety of Central Nervous System (CNS) pharmacological properties. The species is present endogenously in many tissues, where it acts as a neurotransmitter on a gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) receptor (GHBR), and possesses neuromodulatory properties with significant effects on dopamine and gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA). Studies have suggested that sodium oxybate improves Rapid Eye Movement Sleep (REM sleep, REMS) of narcoleptics in contrast to antidepressant drugs.
Sodium oxybate is also known as sodium 4-hydroxybutanoate, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid sodium salt, and has the following chemical structure:
Sodium oxybate is marketed commercially in the United States as Xyrem®. The product is formulated as an immediate release liquid solution that is taken once immediately before bed, and a second time approximately 2.5 to 4 hours later, in equal doses. Sleep-onset can be dramatic and fast, and patients are advised to be sitting in bed when consuming the dose. The most commonly reported side effects are confusion, depressive syndrome, incontinence and sleepwalking.
When initiating treatment with sodium oxybate, careful titration up to an adequate level is essential both to obtain positive results and avoid adverse effects. The recommended starting dose is 4.5 g divided into 2 equal doses of 2.25 g, the first taken at bedtime and the second taken 2.5 to 4 hours later. The starting dosage can be decreased to 3.0 g/day or increased to as high as 9.0 g/day in increments of 1.5 g/day (0.75 g per dose). Two weeks are recommended between dosage adjustments to optimize reduction of daytime symptoms and minimize side effects. The ideal dose will provide an effective eight hours of sleep but, at the end of eight hours, very little of the drug will remain in the patient's bloodstream to affect the patient's wakefulness.
The requirement to take Xyrem® twice each night is a substantial inconvenience to narcolepsy patients. The patient must typically set an alarm to take the second dose, which can interrupt ongoing productive sleep. Several efforts have been made to provide a once-nightly modified release dosage form of sodium oxybate, but none has yet received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) or proven effective in the clinic.
One of the biggest drawbacks of these once-nightly formulations is the reduction in bioavailability that occurs when sodium oxybate is formulated in a modified release dosage form, as measured by the blood concentration/time area under the curve (“AUC”). U.S. 2012/0076865 A1 by Allphin et al. (“Allphin”), for example, conducted two separate crossover bioavailability trials involving three separate modified release formulations and an immediate release solution, and reported the following bioavailability results:
As can be seen, mean AUCinf, which measures the total exposure of the body to sodium oxybate for a given dose, was significantly less for the doses having a modified release component when compared to the immediate release doses. Mean AUCinf for Treatment B, which included the exact same dose of sodium oxybate as Treatment A, was only 56% of the mean AUCinf for Treatment A; mean AUCinf for Treatment C, which also included the same dose of sodium oxybate as Treatment A, was only 63% of the mean AUCinf for Treatment A; mean AUCinf for Treatment E was only 81% of the mean AUCinf of Treatment A, even though Treatment E dosed 2 g more of sodium oxybate than Treatment A, which, compared to same dose, represented only 61% of the mean AUCinf of Treatment A. Mean AUCinf for Treatment D was only 22% of the mean AUCinf of Treatment A, although Treatment D dosed 2 g less of sodium oxybate than Treatment A, which, compared to same dose, represented only 33% of the mean AUCinf of Treatment A. As shown in FIGS. 12 and 14 of U.S. 2012/0076865 A1, Allphin's formulations also suffered from an excess of sodium oxybate remaining in the bloodstream at 8 hours.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,193,211 to Liang et al. (“Liang”) reports even lower bioavailability from his once-nightly formulations. Liang developed several enterically coated delayed release formulations of sodium oxybate, and tested these formulations in dogs alongside an immediate release formulation to compare the relative pharmacokinetics (PK) of these formulations. The results of Liang's testing are reported below:
As can be seen, by encapsulating the sodium oxybate in an enteric/delayed release coating, Liang decreased the AUC of the sodium oxybate significantly. One of the formulations, DR1-w/Acid, had a relative bioavailability of only 22% compared to the immediate release dosage form. DR2 had the greatest relative bioavailability, but still only 53% compared to the immediate release dosage form. One can easily calculate that any of the envisioned combinations of immediate release (IR) components and delayed release (DR) components as described in col. 5 lines 3 to 28 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,193,211 will not give a relative bioavailability greater than 78%.
All of these formulations are inconvenient for at least two reasons: (1) the low relative bioavailability necessitates an increase in the dose compared to current IR treatments which already require a large dose (4.5 to 9 g a day), and (2) when provided in the form of pills, a patient must swallow around 4 to 9 pills per dose, which is a serious inconvenience for the patient and potential drawback for patient compliance.
Various other techniques are known for formulating modified release dosage forms including, for example, the techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,101,209 to Legrand et al. (“Legrand”). Legrand provides a system ensuring that the active ingredient is released with certainty from the modified release dosage form by means of a dual mechanism of “time-dependent” and “pH-dependent” release. Legrand did not describe any dosage forms for delivering sodium oxybate or other forms of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
Another drawback of Xyrem® is the high level of the daily dose, generally 7.5 g or 9 g of sodium oxybate taken daily over long periods of time. This represents a very high sodium intake which is not recommended in persons with high blood pressure, risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke or coronary heart disease (See WHO. Guideline: Sodium intake for adults and children. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO), 2012.).
Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that are administered only once at bed-time with improved dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles.
Another object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that optimize the bioavailability of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and roughly approximate the bioavailability of an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide once-nightly modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that roughly approximate or exceed the bioavailability of an equal dose of an immediate release solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly, across the entire therapeutic range of sodium oxybate doses.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate which, 8 hours after administration, produce very little residual drug content in the bloodstream of most patients but still similar to the one observed after administration of an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly.
Yet another object of the present invention is to improve the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profile of gamma-hydroxybutyrate based on novel dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that yield a similar pharmacokinetic profile compared to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly while potentially giving a reduced dose.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that allow once daily administration and reduced dose compared to the commercial treatment Xyrem®.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a convenient dosage form of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that can be easily swallowed.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that are administered only once at bed-time with improved dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles and reduced sodium content compared to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly.
As the prior art demonstrates, it is extremely difficult to find a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate which, when administered only once nightly, has a comparable bioavailability to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly. Even if such a formulation could be found, it probably still would not be satisfactory because the dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate differs among individuals, and the size of the dose affects the amount of drug absorbed through the GI tract. I.e., even if the prior art formulations achieved comparable bioavailability at one dose—which they do not—they would not be comparable at other doses.
The inventors have discovered a novel relationship between the in vitro release profile of gamma-hydroxybutyrate modified release formulations and in vivo absorption which permits, for the first time, a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that approximates the bioavailability of a twice-nightly equipotent immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, and that does so across a range of therapeutic doses. In particular, the inventors have discovered that a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that rapidly releases half of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate in 0.1N hydrochloric acid dissolution medium, and rapidly releases the other half of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 dissolution medium, approximates or exceeds the in vivo bioavailability of an equipotent immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly. This can be seen by comparing the formulations of Examples 1 and 4, which satisfy the dissolution requirements of the present invention and achieve the necessary bioavailability for a commercial formulation, with the Comparative formulation of Example 7, which exhibited a dissolution profile similar to prior art dissolution profiles, and did not achieve the necessary bioavailability for a commercial formulation.
This phenomenon is observed especially with higher doses of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. For example, the inventors have discovered that a modified release composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal at the dose equivalent to 7.5 g of sodium oxybate results in a similar pharmacokinetic profile as an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate given in two separate equal doses of 4.5 g of sodium oxybate each administered at t0 and t4h.
The modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate preferably have both immediate release and modified release portions. The release of gamma-hydroxybutyrate from the immediate release portion is practically uninhibited, and occurs almost immediately in 0.1N hydrochloric acid dissolution medium. In contrast, while the modified release portion also preferably releases its gamma-hydroxybutyrate almost immediately when fully triggered, the release is not triggered until a predetermined lag-time or the drug is subjected to a suitable dissolution medium such as a phosphate buffer pH 6.8 dissolution medium. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that this rapid release in two dissolution media compresses the blood concentration vs. time curve in vivo, resulting in a relative bioavailability of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comparable to or greater than an equipotent dose of an immediate-release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly.
Formulations that achieve this improved bioavailability can be described using several different pharmacokinetic and in vitro dissolution parameters. In a first principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 340 hr×microgram/mL.
In a second principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 340 hr×microgram/mL, and a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130% of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In a third principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the formulation releases (a) at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a fourth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37 C and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a fifth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a sixth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 340 hr×microgram/mL, and a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130%, of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal, and (b) the formulation releases (i) at least 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (ii) from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a seventh principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) said immediate release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (b) said modified release portion releases less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; and (c) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In an eighth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) said immediate release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (b) said modified release portion releases less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (c) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; and (d) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a ninth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein 4.5 g, 6 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the formulation have been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In a tenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein 4.5 g and 9 g doses of the formulation have been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In an eleventh principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g, 6.0 g or 7.5 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
In a twelfth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
In a thirteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
In a fourteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
In a fifteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein said modified release portion yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
In a sixteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile between the minimum and maximum values depicted in
In a seventeenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile between the minimum and maximum values depicted in
In an eighteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yielding a dissolution profile substantially as shown in any one of
A nineteenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g, 7.5 g or 9.0 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
A twentieth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile between the minimum and maximum values depicted in
Still further embodiments relate to methods of using the formulations of the present invention to treat narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms, and to physical aspects of the formulations of the present invention. Additional principal embodiments and sub-embodiments thereto will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The embodiments and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention and the Examples included therein.
Wherever an analysis or test is required to understand a given property or characteristic recited herein, it will be understood that the analysis or test is performed in accordance with applicable guidances, draft guidances, regulations and monographs of the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and United States Pharmacopoeia (“USP”) applicable to drug products in the United States in force as of Nov. 1, 2015 unless otherwise specified. Clinical endpoints can be judged with reference to standards adopted by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, including standards published at C Iber, S Ancoli-Israel, A Chesson, S F Quan. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2007.
When a pharmacokinetic comparison is made between a formulation described or claimed herein and a reference product, it will be understood that the comparison is preferably performed in a suitable designed cross-over trial, although it will also be understood that a cross-over trial is not required unless specifically stated. It will also be understood that the comparison can be made either directly or indirectly. For example, even if a formulation has not been tested directly against a reference formulation, it can still satisfy a comparison to the reference formulation if it has been tested against a different formulation, and the comparison with the reference formulation can be deduced therefrom.
As used in this specification and in the claims which follow, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an ingredient” includes mixtures of ingredients, reference to “an active pharmaceutical agent” includes more than one active pharmaceutical agent, and the like.
“Bioavailability” means the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or activemoiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action.
“Relative bioavailability” or “Rel BA” or “RBA” means the percentage of mean AUCinf of the tested product relative to the mean AUCinf of the reference product. Unless otherwise specified, relative bioavailability refers to the percentage of the mean AUCinf observed for a full dose of the test product relative to the mean AUCinf observed for two ½—doses of an immediate release liquid solution administered four hours apart.
“Bioequivalence” means the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives become available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study.
When ranges are given by specifying the lower end of a range separately from the upper end of the range, it will be understood that the range can be defined by selectively combining any one of the lower end variables with any one of the upper end variables that is mathematically and physically possible. Thus, for example, if a formulation may contain from 1 to 10 weight parts of a particular ingredient, or 2 to 8 parts of a particular ingredient, it will be understood that the formulation may also contain from 2 to 10 parts of the ingredient. In like manner, if a formulation may contain greater than 1 or 2 weight parts of an ingredient and up to 10 or 9 weight parts of the ingredient, it will be understood that the formulation may contain 1-10 weight parts of the ingredient, 2-9 weight parts of the ingredient, etc. unless otherwise specified, the boundaries of the range (lower and upper ends of the range) are included in the claimed range.
In like manner, when various sub-embodiments of a senior (i.e. principal) embodiment are described herein, it will be understood that the sub-embodiments for the senior embodiment can be combined to define another sub-embodiment. Thus, for example, when a principal embodiment includes sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3, it will be understood that the principal embodiment can be further limited by any one of sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3, or any combination of sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3 that is mathematically and physically possible. In like manner, it will be understood that the principal embodiments described herein can be combined in any manner that is mathematically and physically possible, and that the invention extends to such combinations.
When used herein the term “about” or “substantially” or “approximately” will compensate for variability allowed for in the pharmaceutical industry and inherent in pharmaceutical products, such as differences in product strength due to manufacturing variation and time-induced product degradation. The term allows for any variation which in the practice of pharmaceuticals would allow the product being evaluated to be considered bioequivalent to the recited strength, as described in FDA's March 2003 Guidance for Industry on BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES FOR ORALLY ADMINISTERED DRUG PRODUCTS—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.
When used herein the term “gamma-hydroxybutyrate” or GHB, unless otherwise specified, refers to the free base of gamma hydroxy-butyrate, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and combinations thereof, their hydrates, solvates, complexes or tautomers forms. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid salts can be selected from the sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or sodium oxybate, the potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the lithium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric, the tetra ammonium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or any other pharmaceutically acceptable salt forms of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable” means that which is useful in preparing a pharmaceutical composition that is generally safe, non-toxic and neither biologically nor otherwise undesirable and includes that which is acceptable for veterinary use as well as human pharmaceutical use. The term “formulation” or “composition” refers to the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of a drug product or dosage form prepared in accordance with the current invention.
As used herein the doses and strengths of gamma-hydroxybutyrate are expressed in equivalent-gram (g) weights of sodium oxybate unless stated expressly to the contrary. Thus, when considering a dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate other than the sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, one must convert the recited dose or strength from sodium oxybate to the gamma-hydroxybutyrate under evaluation. Thus, if an embodiment is said to provide a 4.5 g dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, because the form of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is not specified, it will be understood that the dose encompasses a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate, a 5.1 g dose of potassium gamma-hydroxybutyrate (assuming a 126.09 g/mol MW for sodium oxybate and a 142.20 g/mol MW for potassium gamma-hydroxybutyrate), and a 3.7 g dose of the free base (assuming a 126.09 g/mol MW for sodium oxybate and a 104.1 g/mol MW for the free base of gamma-hydroxybutyrate), or by the weight of any mixture of salts of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid that provides the same amount of GHB as 4.5 g of sodium oxybate.
As used herein “microparticle” means any discreet particle of solid material. The particle can be made of a single material or have a complex structure with core and shells and be made of several materials. The terms “microparticle”, “particle”, “microspheres” or “pellet” are interchangeable and have the same meaning. Unless otherwise specified, the microparticle has no particular particle size or diameter and is not limited to particles with volume mean diameter D(4,3) below 1 mm.
As used herein, the “volume mean diameter D(4,3)” is calculated according to the following formula:
D(4,3)=Σ(d4i.ni)/Σ(d3i.ni)
wherein the diameter d of a given particle is the diameter of a hard sphere having the same volume as the volume of that particle.
As used herein, the terms “finished composition”, “finished formulation” or “formulation” are interchangeable and designate the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate preferably comprising modified release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and any other excipients.
As used herein and in the claims that follow, an “immediate release (IR) portion” of a formulation includes physically discreet portions of a formulation, mechanistically discreet portions of a formulation, and pharmacokinetically discreet portions of a formulation that lend to or support a defined IR pharmacokinetic characteristic. Thus, for example, any formulation that releases active ingredient at the rate and extent required of the immediate release portion of the formulations of the present invention includes an “immediate release portion,” even if the immediate release portion is physically integrated in what might otherwise be considered an extended release formulation. Thus, the IR portion can be structurally discreet or structurally indiscreet from (i.e. integrated with) the MR portion. In a preferred embodiment, the IR portion and MR portion are provided as particles, and in an even more preferred subembodiment the IR portion and MR portion are provided as particles discreet from each other.
As used here in, “immediate release formulation” or “immediate release portion” refers to a composition that releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate in 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in a 0.1N HCl dissolution medium at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In like manner, a “modified-release (MR) portion” includes that portion of a formulation or dosage form that lends to or supports a particular MR pharmacokinetic characteristic, regardless of the physical formulation in which the MR portion is integrated. The modified release drug delivery systems are designed to deliver drugs at a specific time or over a period of time after administration, or at a specific location in the body. The USP defines a modified release system as one in which the time course or location of drug release or both, are chosen to accomplish objectives of therapeutic effectiveness or convenience not fulfilled by conventional IR dosage forms. More specifically, MR solid oral dosage forms include extended release (ER) and delayed-release (DR) products. A DR product is one that releases a drug all at once at a time other than promptly after administration. Typically, coatings (e.g., enteric coatings) are used to delay the release of the drug substance until the dosage form has passed through the acidic medium of the stomach. An ER product is formulated to make the drug available over an extended period after ingestion, thus allowing a reduction in dosing frequency compared to a drug presented as a conventional dosage form, e.g. a solution or an immediate release dosage form. For oral applications, the term “extended-release” is usually interchangeable with “sustained-release”, “prolonged-release” or “controlled-release”.
Traditionally, extended-release systems provided constant drug release to maintain a steady concentration of drug. For some drugs, however, zero-order delivery may not be optimal and more complex and sophisticated systems have been developed to provide multi-phase delivery. One can distinguish among four categories of oral MR delivery systems: (1) delayed-release using enteric coatings, (2) site-specific or timed release (e.g. for colonic delivery), (3) extended-release (e.g., zero-order, first-order, biphasic release, etc.), and (4), programmed release (e.g., pulsatile, delayed extended release, etc.) See Modified Oral Drug Delivery Systems at page 34 in Gibaldi's DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS, 2007 and Rational Design of Oral Modified—release Drug Delivery Systems at page 469 in DEVELOPING SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORMS: PHARMACEUTICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, Academic Press, Elsevier, 2009. As used herein, “modified release formulation” or “modified release portion” in one embodiment refers to a composition that releases its gamma-hydroxybutyrate according a multiphase delivery that is comprised in the fourth class of MR products, e.g. delayed extended release. As such it differs from the delayed release products that are classified in the first class of MR products.
As used herein the terms “coating”, “coating layer,” “coating film,” “film coating” and like terms are interchangeable and have the same meaning. The terms refer to the coating applied to a particle comprising the gamma-hydroxybutyrate that controls the modified release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In all pharmacokinetic testing described herein, unless otherwise stated, the dosage form, or the initial dosage form if the dosing regimen calls for more than one administration, is administered approximately two hours after consumption of a standardized dinner consisting of 25.5% fat, 19.6% protein, and 54.9% carbohydrates.
A “similar PK profile” or “comparable bioavailability” means that the mean AUCinf of a test product is from 80% to 125% of the mean AUCinf of a reference product in a suitably designed cross-over trial, and that the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h) of the test product is from 50% to 130% of the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h) of the reference product.
Type 1 Narcolepsy (NT1) refers to narcolepsy characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (“EDS”) and cataplexy. Type 2 Narcolepsy (NT2) refers to narcolepsy characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness without cataplexy. A diagnosis of narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) can be confirmed by one or a combination of (i) an overnight polysomnogram (PSG) and a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) performed within the last 2 years, (ii) a full documentary evidence confirming diagnosis from the PSG and MSLT from a sleep laboratory must be made available, (iii) current symptoms of narcolepsy including: current complaint of EDS for the last 3 months (ESS greater than 10), (iv) mean MWT less than 8 minutes, (v) mean number of cataplexy events of 8 per week on baseline Sleep/Cataplexy Diary, and/or (vi) presence of cataplexy for the last 3 months and 28 events per week during screening period.
Unless otherwise specified herein, percentages, ratios and numeric values recited herein are based on weight; averages and means are arithmetic means; all pharmacokinetic measurements based on the measurement of bodily fluids are based on plasma concentrations.
It will be understood, when defining a composition by its pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties herein, that the formulation can in the alternative be defined as “means for” achieving the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties. Thus, a formulation in which the modified release portion releases less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour can instead be defined as a formulation comprising “means for” or “modified release means for” releasing less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour. It will be further understood that the preferred structures for achieving the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties are the structures described in the examples hereof that accomplish the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties.
The invention can be described in terms of principal embodiments, which in turn can be recombined to make other principal embodiments, and limited by sub-embodiments to make other principal embodiments.
A first principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 245, 300, 325, 340, 375, 400, 425, or 450 hr×microgram/mL, most preferably greater than 340 hr×microgram/mL.
A second principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 245, 265, 285, 300, 315, 325, 340, 350, 375, 400, 425, or 450 hr×microgram/mL, most preferably greater than 340 hr×microgram/mL, and a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130%, from 60% to 130%, from 70% to 130%, from 75% to 125%, from 80% to 125%, from 80 to 120%, from 90% to 110%, from 50% to 95%, from 60% to 90%, most preferably from 60% to 90% or 60% to 130% of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
A third principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the formulation releases (a) at least 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, 2 hours, 1 hour, 0.5 hours, or 0.25 hours, preferably 1 hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 10 to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%, preferably from 40% to 60%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
A fourth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, 2 hours, 1 hour, 0.5 hours, or 0.25 hours, preferably 1 hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 10 to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%, preferably from 40% to 60%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion preferably releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
A fifth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, 2 hours, 1 hour, 0.5 hours, or 0.25 hours, preferably 1 hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 10 to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%, preferably from 40% to 60%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60%, 70%, or 80%, preferably greater than 80%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
A sixth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 245, 300, 325, 340, 375, 400, 425, or 450 hr×microgram/mL, preferably 340 hr×microgram/mL, and a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130%, from 60% to 130%, from 70% to 130%, from 75% to 125%, from 80% to 125%, from 80 to 120%, from 90% to 110%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90%, preferably from 60% to 90% or from 60% to 130%, of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal, and (b) the formulation releases (i) at least 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours, 2 hours, 1 hour, 0.5 hours, or 0.25 hours, preferably 1 hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (ii) from 10 to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%, preferably from 40% to 60%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
A seventh principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) said immediate release portion releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (b) said modified release portion releases less than 20% or 10% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; and (c) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at three hours, two hours or one hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
An eighth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) said immediate release portion releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour, two hours, or three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (b) said modified release portion releases less than 20% or 10% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (c) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at three hours, two hours, or one hour, when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; and (d) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% or 90% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
A ninth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 4.5 g, 6 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80%, 85% or 90% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal. The relative bioavailability is even higher with larger doses, and with a 6.0 g or 7.5 g or 9.0 g dose is preferably greater than 90, 95 or 100% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at to and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
A tenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, wherein a 4.5 g and a 9 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at to and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
An eleventh principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g, 6.0 g, or 7.5 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
A twelfth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
A thirteenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
A fourteenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
A fifteenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile substantially as depicted in
In a sixteenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile between the minimum and maximum values depicted in
In a seventeenth principal embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions that yields a dissolution profile between the minimum and maximum values depicted in
In an eighteenth principal embodiment the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yielding a dissolution profile substantially as shown in any one of
A nineteenth principal embodiment of the present invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, that yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 4.5 g, 7.5 g or 9.0 g approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
In any of these principal embodiments, the formulation is preferably effective to treat narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2. The formulation is also preferably effective to induce sleep for six to eight, most preferably eight consecutive hours.
In any of these principal embodiments, the formulation preferably comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the modified release portion comprises gamma hydroxybutyrate particles coated by a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C., and the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35. The polymers comprising free carboxylic groups preferably have a pH dissolution trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and are preferably methacrylic acid copolymers having a pH dissolution trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97.
In a first principal structural embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In a second principal structural embodiment the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, a suspending or viscosifying agent, and an acidifying agent, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In a third principal structural embodiment the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In a fourth principal structural embodiment the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In a fifth principal structural embodiment the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a methacrylic acid copolymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
As mentioned in the definitions section of this document, each of the sub-embodiments can be used to further characterize and limit each of the foregoing principal embodiments. In addition, more than one of the following sub-embodiments can be combined and used to further characterize and limit each of the foregoing principal embodiments, in any manner that is mathematically and physically possible.
In various sub-embodiments of the foregoing principal embodiments a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate can be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 245, 265, 285, 300, 315, 325, 340, 350, 375, 400, 425, or 450 hr×microgram/mL when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal. An upper limit on mean AUCinf for such 7.5 g dose can be set at 500 or 550 hr×microgram/mL.
In additional sub-embodiments of the foregoing principal embodiments a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate can be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean Cmax of greater than 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, or 90 microgram/mL when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal. An upper limit on mean Cm, for such 7.5 g dose can be set at 125 or 100 microgram/mL.
In additional sub-embodiments of the forgoing principal embodiments a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate can be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130%, from 60% to 130%, from 70 to 130%, from 75% to 125%, from 80% to 125%, from 80 to 120%, or from 90% to 110% of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered at t0 and t4h in two equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In one sub-embodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 340 hr·microgram/mL, and a mean C8h that is from 50% to 130% of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
Further sub-embodiments can be characterized based on the dissolution properties of the entire (or finished) modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in 0.1N hydrochloric acid dissolution medium. Thus, in additional sub-embodiments the entire modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate releases greater than 30%, 35%, 40%, or 45%, and less than 70%, 65%, 60%, or 55%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
Further sub-embodiments can be defined based on the dissolution properties of the modified release portion of the formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a phosphate buffer pH 6.8 dissolution medium. Thus, in additional sub-embodiments the modified release portion releases greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or even 99% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3, 2, 1, 0.5 or 0.25 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
Still further embodiments can be defined based on the dissolution properties of the modified release portion of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a 0.1N HCl dissolution medium. Thus, in additional sub-embodiments the modified release portion releases less than 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, or even 2% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In additional embodiments, the modified release portion releases less than 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, or even 2% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours and more than 30%, 35%, 40%, 45% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at ten hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
Further embodiments can be defined based on the dissolution properties of the immediate release portion of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a 0.1N HCl dissolution medium. Thus, in additional sub-embodiments the immediate release portion releases greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or even 99% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In another sub-embodiment, the formulation releases (a) at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In another subembodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, and (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In another sub-embodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, and (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases 10% to 65% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
Still further sub-embodiments can be defined based on a pharmacokinetic comparison of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate to an immediate release solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Therefore, in additional sub-embodiments the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably in a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g, and 9.0 g dose, has been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In additional sub-embodiments of the forgoing principal embodiments the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein a 4.5 g and 9 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80%, 85% or 90% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal
In additional sub-embodiments, a 6.0 g or 7.5 g or 9.0 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
The modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention can also be defined by comparing the area under the concentration/time curve for eight hours to the area under the concentration/time curve calculated to infinity. Thus, in still further sub-embodiments a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g or 9.0 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of AUC8h to AUCinf of greater than 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95 or 0.98 when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In still further sub-embodiments, the modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate are defined based on the concentration of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the blood stream 8 hours after administration. Therefore, in other sub-embodiments the formulation can be characterized by a 4.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that has been shown to achieve a mean C8h of from 4.7 to 9.0, from 5.4 to 8.3, from 6.1 to 7.6, from 3.5 to 7.0, or from 4.0 to 5.5 microgram/mL, a 6.0 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C8h of from 6.3 to 16.7, from 7.3 to 15.4, from 8.2 to 14.1, from 8.9 to 16.7, from 10.2 to 15.4, or from 11.5 to 14.1 microgram/mL; or a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C8h of from 13.0 to 40.3, from 16.0 to 26.0, 15.0 to 25.0, from 17.5 to 22.0, from 21.6 to 40.3, from 24.7 to 37.2, or from 27.8 to 34.1 microgram/mL, when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
The modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention can also be defined by the concentration/time and dissolution curves that they produce when tested according to the examples of the present invention. Therefore, in other sub-embodiments, a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, or 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention has been shown to achieve a time/concentration curve substantially as shown in
The modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention can also be defined based on the time required to reach maximum blood concentration of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Thus, in additional sub-embodiments, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a median Tmax of 1.25 to 3.25 hours, preferably of about 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, 3, or 3.25 hours when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal. A lower limit on the median Tmax in any of the foregoing ranges can alternatively be set at 0.5 or 1.0 hours.
Additional embodiments can be defined by comparing a dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, administered once nightly, to the same dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate divided in half and administered twice nightly, 4 hours apart. Thus, in another sub-embodiment a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g or 9.0 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a median Tmax within one hundred fifty, one hundred twenty, ninety, sixty or thirty minutes of the median Tmax of half the dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In still another sub-embodiment a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g or 9.0 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C6h or mean C7h greater than, and a mean C10h less than, the mean C4h of half the dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, when administered approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
Additional embodiments can be defined by comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of a dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered once nightly to the same dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate divided in half and administered twice nightly, 4 hours apart. Thus, in another sub-embodiment a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C3h to the mean Cmax of the first half dose of the immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate from 0.6 to 1.2, preferably from 0.7 to 1.1 and most preferably from 0.8 to 1. In another sub-embodiment, a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C4h to the mean Cmax of the first half dose of the immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate from 0.5 to 1.1, preferably from 0.6 to 1 and most preferably from 0.7 to 0.9. In another sub-embodiment, a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C4.5h to the mean Cmax of the first half dose of the immediate release liquid solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate from 0.5 to 1, preferably from 0.5 to 0.9 and most preferably from 0.6 to 0.8.
Additional sub-embodiments can be defined by the range of mean blood concentrations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate achieved 3, 4, 4.5 or 5 hours after administration once nightly by a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention at the dose of 7.5 g. Thus, in another sub-embodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C3h of 43 to 81 microgram/mL, preferably 49 to 75 microgram/mL and more preferably 55 to 69 microgram/mL. In another sub-embodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C4h of 40 to 75 microgram/mL, preferably 45 to 69 microgram/mL and more preferably 51 to 64 microgram/mL. In another sub-embodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C4.5h of 35 to 67 microgram/mL, preferably 40 to 62 microgram/mL and more preferably 45 to 56 microgram/mL. In another sub-embodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a mean C5h of 31 to 59 microgram/mL, preferably 36 to 55 microgram/mL and more preferably 40 to 50 microgram/mL.
In another subembodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 300 hr·microgram/mL and a mean Cmax of greater than 70 microgram/mL when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In still another subembodiment, a 7.5 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 350 hr·microgram/mL and a mean Cmax of greater than 80 microgram/mL when administered once approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
In another subembodiment, a 4.5, 6.0, 7.5 and 9.0 g dose of the formulation has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 80% of the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal, and a mean C8h less than 95%, 90 or 85% of the mean C8h provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized evening meal.
Additional embodiments can be defined by comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of a dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered once nightly to another dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate divided in half and administered twice nightly, 4 hours apart. Thus, in another sub-embodiment a 7.5 g dose of the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to achieve a similar pharmacokinetic profile to the pharmacokinetic profile provided by a 2×4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate as an immediate release liquid solution administered for the first 4.5 g two hours after a standardized evening meal and for the second 4.5 g dose, 4 hours after the first dose. Thus, in another sub-embodiment a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention administered at the dose of 7.5 g has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C3h to the mean Cmax of the first 4.5 g dose of the immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate from 0.5 to 1.1, preferably from 0.6 to 1 and most preferably from 0.7 to 0.9. In another sub-embodiment, a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C4h to the mean Cmax of the first 4.5 g dose of the immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate from 0.5 to 1, preferably from 0.6 to 0.9 and most preferably from 0.7 to 0.8. In another sub-embodiment, a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention has been shown to achieve a ratio of its mean C4.5h to the mean Cmax of the 4.5 g dose of the immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate from 0.4 to 0.9, preferably from 0.5 to 0.8 and most preferably from 0.6 to 0.7.
In another subembodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) said immediate release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; (b) said modified release portion releases less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm; and (c) said modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention achieves an in vitro dissolution profile:
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention achieves an in vitro dissolution profile:
In another preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention achieves an in vitro dissolution profile:
In another preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate according to the invention achieves an in vitro dissolution profile:
In still another subembodiment, the formulation achieves an in vitro dissolution profile: (a) measured in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, characterized by the percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate dissolved being: (i) from 40% to 65% at 1 hour, (ii) from 40% to 65% at 3 hours, (iii) greater than 45% at 8 hours, and (b) measured in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, characterized by the percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate dissolved being: (i) greater than 40% at 0.5 hour, and (ii) greater than 85% at 1 hour.
Alternatively, the formulation can be described as achieving an in vitro dissolution profile measured in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, characterized by the percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate dissolved being: (i) from 40% to 65% at 1 hour, (ii) from 40% to 65% at 3 hours, and (iii) greater than 45% at 8 hours.
In another alternative, the formulation can be described as achieving an in vitro dissolution profile measured in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, characterized by the percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate dissolved being: (i) greater than 40% at 0.5 hour, and (ii) greater than 85% at 1 hour.
The modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention can be provided in any dosage form that is suitable for oral administration, including tablets, capsules, liquids, orally dissolving tablets, and the like, but they are preferably provided as dry particulate formulations (i.e. granules, powders, coated particles, microparticles, pellets, microspheres, etc.), in a sachet or other suitable discreet packaging units. A preferred particulate formulation will be mixed with tap water shortly before administration, preferably 50 mL.
In one subembodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; and (b) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In one subembodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; and (b) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 40/60 to 60/40.
In another subembodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40.
In another subembodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40; and (e) the film coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the microparticles.
In another subembodiment the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In a particularly preferred sub-embodiment of the immediately preceding sub-embodiments, the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups comprises from 100% poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 and 0% poly (methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate) 1:2 to 2% poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 and 98% poly (methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate) 1:2; and the hydrophobic compound comprises hydrogenated vegetable oil.
In a preferred embodiment, the formulation includes excipients to improve the viscosity and the pourability of the mixture of the particulate formulation with tap water. As such, the particulate formulation comprises, besides the immediate release and modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, one or more suspending or viscosifying agents or lubricants.
Preferred suspending or viscosifying agents are chosen from the group consisting of xanthan gum, medium viscosity sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose and guar gum, medium viscosity hydroxyethyl cellulose, agar, sodium alginate, mixtures of sodium alginate and calcium alginate, gellan gum, carrageenan gum grade iota, kappa or lambda, and medium viscosity hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose.
Medium viscosity sodium carboxymethyl cellulose corresponds to grade of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 25° C., is greater than 200 mPa·s and lower than 3100 mPa·s.
Medium viscosity hydroxyethyl cellulose corresponds to a grade of hydroxyethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 25° C., is greater than 250 mPa·s and lower than 6500 mPa·s. Medium viscosity hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose corresponds to a grade of hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 20° C., is greater than 80 mPa·s. and lower than 3800 mPa·s.
Preferred suspending or viscosifying agents are xanthan gum, especially Xantural 75™ from Kelco, hydroxyethylcellulose, especially Natrosol 250M™ from Ashland, Kappa carrageenan gum, especially Gelcarin PH812™ from FMC Biopolymer, and lambda carrageenan gum, especially Viscarin PH209™ from FMC Biopolymer.
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises from 1 to 15% of viscosifying or suspending agents, preferably from 2 to 10%, more preferably from 2 to 5%, and most preferably from 2 to 3% of the formulation.
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is in the form of a powder that is intended to be dispersed in water prior to administration and further comprises from 1 to 15% of a suspending or viscosifying agent selected from a mixture of xanthan gum, carrageenan gum and hydroxyethylcellulose or xanthan gum and carrageenan gum.
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is in the form of a powder that is intended to be dispersed in water prior to administration and further comprises: from 1.2 to 15% of an acidifying agent selected from malic acid and tartaric acid; and from 1 to 15% of a suspending or viscosifying agent selected from a mixture of xanthan gum, carrageenan gum and hydroxyethylcellulose or xanthan gum and carrageenan gum.
In a most preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises about 1% of lambda carrageenan gum or Viscarin PH209™, about 1% of medium viscosity grade of hydroxyethyl cellulose or Natrosol 250™, and about 0.7% of xanthan gum or Xantural 75™. For a 4.5 g dose unit, these percentages will typically equate to about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™), about 75 mg carrageenan gum (Viscarin PH209™) and about 75 mg hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrasol 250M™).
Alternative packages of viscosifying or suspending agents, for a 4.5 g dose, include about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™) and about 100 mg carrageenan gum (Gelcarin PH812™), or about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™), about 75 mg hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrasol 250™), and about 75 mg carrageenan gum (Viscarin PH109™).
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate further comprises a lubricant or a glidant, besides the immediate release and modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Preferred lubricants and glidants are chosen from the group consisting of salts of stearic acid, in particular magnesium stearate, calcium stearate or zinc stearate, esters of stearic acid, in particular glyceryl monostearate or glyceryl palmitostearate, stearic acid, glycerol behenate, sodium stearyl fumarate, talc, and colloidal silicon dioxide.
The preferred lubricant or glidant is magnesium stearate.
The lubricant or glidant can be used in the particulate formulation in an amount of from 0.1 to 5%. The preferred amount is about 0.5%.
Most preferably, the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises about 0.5% of magnesium stearate.
A preferred modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate further comprises an acidifying agent. The acidifying agent helps to ensure that the release profile of the formulation in 0.1N HCl will remain substantially unchanged for at least 15 minutes after mixing, which is approximately the maximum length of time a patient might require before consuming the dose after mixing the formulation with tap water.
In one particular subembodiment the formulation is a powder, and further comprising an acidifying agent and a suspending or viscosifying agent, preferably in the weight percentages recited herein.
The preferred acidifying agents are chosen from the group consisting of malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, adipic acid, boric acid, maleic acid, phosphoric acid, ascorbic acid, oleic acid, capric acid, caprylic acid, and benzoic acid. In a preferred embodiment, the acidifying agent is present in the formulation from 1.2 to 15%, preferably from 1.2 to 10%, preferably from 1.2 to 5%. Preferred acidifying agents are tartaric acid and malic acid, with malic acid being most preferred.
When tartaric acid is employed, it is preferably employed in an amount of from 1 to 10%, from 2.5 to 7.5%, or about 5%. In a most preferred embodiment, the amount of malic acid in the modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is from 1.2 to 15%, preferably from 1.2 to 10%, preferably from 1.2 to 5%, and most preferably 1.6% or 3.2%.
In a most preferred embodiment, the amount of malic acid in the modified release formulation of gamma hydroxybutyrate is about 1.6%.
The modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate preferably includes an immediate release portion and a modified release portion of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and in a particularly preferred embodiment, the formulation is a particulate formulation that includes a plurality of immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate particles and a plurality of modified release gamma-hydroxybutyrate particles. The molar ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release and modified release portions preferably ranges from 0.11:1 to 1.86:1, from 0.17:1 to 1.5:1, from 0.25:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.33:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.42:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.53:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.66:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.66:1 to 1.5:1, from 0.8:1 to 1.22:1, and preferably is about 1:1. The molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation preferably ranges from 10% to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%, preferably from 40% to 60%. In a preferred embodiment, the molar percentage of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation is about 50%. The molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the modified release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation preferably ranges from 90% to 35%, from 85 to 40%, from 80 to 45%, from 75 to 45%, from 70 to 45%, from 65 to 45%, from 60 to 45%, from 60 to 40%, or from 55 to 45%, preferably from 60% to 40%. In a preferred embodiment, the molar ratio of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the modified release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation is about 50%. The weight percentage of the IR microparticles relative to the total weight of IR microparticles and MR microparticles, preferably ranges from 7.2% to 58.2%, from 11.0% to 52.9%, from 14.9% to 47.8%, from 18.9% to 47.8%, from 23.1% to 47.8%, from 27.4% to 47.8%, from 31.8% to 47.8%, from 31.8% to 52.9%, or from 36.4% to 47.8%. In other embodiments, the weight percentage of the IR microparticles relative to the total weight of IR microparticles and MR microparticles preferably ranges from 5.9% to 63.2%, from 9.1% to 58.1%, from 12.4% to 53.1%, from 19.9% to 53.1%, from 19.6% to 53.1%, from 23.4% to 53.1%, from 27.4% to 53.1% from 27.4% to 58.1%, preferably from 31.7% to 53.1%.
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to 450 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to 170 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In a preferred embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
Other Characteristics of Immediate Release Portion
The immediate release portion of the formulation can take any form capable of achieving an immediate release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate when ingested. For example, when the formulation is a particulate formulation, the formulation can include unmodified “raw” gamma-hydroxybutyrate, rapidly dissolving gamma-hydroxybutyrate granules, particles or microparticles comprised of a core covered by a gamma-hydroxybutyrate loaded layer containing a binder such as povidone.
The IR granules or particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate can be made using any manufacturing process suitable to produce the required particles, including:
Preferably, the immediate release portion of the formulation is in the form of microparticles comprising the immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate and optional pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. In a preferred embodiment, the immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter D(4,3) of from 10 to 1000 microns, preferably from 95 to 600 microns, more preferably from 150 to 400 microns. Most preferably their volume mean diameter is about 270 microns.
The preferred immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate of the present invention comprises a core and a layer deposited on the core that contains the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. The core can be any particle chosen from the group consisting of:
The core can also comprise other particles of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients such as particles of hydroxypropyl cellulose (such as Klucel™ from Aqualon Hercules), guar gum particles (such as Grinsted™ Guar from Danisco), xanthan particles (such as Xantural™ 180 from CP Kelco).
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the cores are sugar spheres or microcrystalline cellulose spheres, such as Cellets™ 90, Cellets™ 100 or Cellets™ 127 marketed by Pharmatrans, or also Celphere™ CP 203, Celphere™ CP305, Celphere™ SCP 100. Preferably the core is a microcrystalline cellulose sphere. Most preferably the core is a Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans.
The core preferably has a mean volume diameter of about 95 to about 450 microns, preferably about 95 to about 170 microns, most preferably about 140 microns.
The layer deposited onto the core comprises the immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Preferably the layer also comprises a binder, which can be chosen from the group consisting of:
Low molecular weight hydroxypropyl cellulose corresponds to grades of hydroxypropyl cellulose having a molecular weight of less than 800,000 g/mol, preferably less than or equal to 400,000 g/mol, and in particular less than or equal to 100,000 g/mol. Low molecular weight hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (or hypromellose) corresponds to grades of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose the solution viscosity of which, for a 2% solution in water and at 20° C., is less than or equal to 1,000 mPa·s, preferably less than or equal to 100 mPa·s and in particular less than or equal to 15 mPa·s. Low molecular weight polyvinyl pyrrolidone (or povidone) corresponds to grades of polyvinyl pyrrolidone having a molecular weight of less than or equal to 1,000,000 g/mol, preferably less than or equal to 800,000 g/mol, and in particular less than or equal to 100,000 g/mol.
Preferably, the binding agent is chosen from low molecular weight polyvinylpyrrolidone or povidone (for example, Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP), low molecular weight hydroxypropyl cellulose (for example, Klucel™ EF from Aqualon-Hercules), low molecular weight hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or hypromellose (for example, Methocel™ E3 or E5 from Dow) and mixtures thereof.
The preferred binder is povidone K30 or K29/32, especially Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP. The binder can be present in an amount of 0 to 80%, 0 to 70%, 0 to 60%, 0 to 50%, 0 to 40%, 0 to 30%, 0 to 25%, 0 to 20%, 0 to 15%, 0 to 10%, or from 1 to 9%, most preferably 5% of binder based on the total weight of the immediate release coating.
The preferred amount of binder is 5% of binder over the total mass of gamma-hydroxybutyrate and binder.
The layer deposited on the core can represent at least 10% by weight, and even greater than 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85 or 90% by weight of the total weight of the immediate release particle of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Most preferably, the layer deposited on the core represents about 85% of the weight of the immediate release particle of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to a preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to a preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns.
According to a preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns.
According to a preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another preferred embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles are manufactured by dissolving the gamma-hydroxybutyrate and the Povidone K30 in a mixture of water/ethanol 40/60 w/w and spraying the resulting solution onto the surface of the microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
Other Characteristics of Modified Release Portion
The modified release portion can be any formulation that provides the desired in vitro dissolution profile of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. The modified release portion is preferably comprised of modified release particles, obtained by coating immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate with a coating (or coating film) that inhibits the immediate release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In one sub-embodiment the modified release portion comprises particles comprising: (a) an inert core; (b) a coating; and (c) a layer comprising the gamma hydroxybutyrate interposed between the core and the coating.
In a preferred embodiment, the modified release portion comprises a time-dependent release mechanism and a pH-dependent release mechanism.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating film comprises at least one polymer carrying free carboxylic groups, and at least one hydrophobic compound preferably characterized by a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.
The polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is preferably selected from: (meth)acrylic acid/alkyl (meth)acrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid and methylmethacrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid and ethyl acrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid copolymers type A, B or C, cellulose derivatives carrying free carboxylic groups, preferably cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate succinate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose phthalate, carboxymethylethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate trimellitate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, zein, shellac, alginate and mixtures thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the methacrylic acid copolymers are chosen from the group consisting of poly (methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate) 1:1 or Eudragit™ L100 or equivalent, poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 or Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent and poly (methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate) 1:2 or Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent.
In another subembodiment the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups wherein the free carboxylic groups are substantially ionized at pH 7.5.
The hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. can be selected from the group consisting of hydrogenated vegetable oils, vegetable waxes, wax yellow, wax white, wax microcrystalline, lanolin, anhydrous milk fat, hard fat suppository base, lauroyl macrogol glycerides, polyglyceryl diisostearate, diesters or triesters of glycerol with a fatty acid, and mixtures thereof.
Even more preferably, the hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. is chosen from the group of following products: hydrogenated cottonseed oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, hydrogenated palm oil, glyceryl behenate, hydrogenated castor oil, candellila wax, tristearin, tripalmitin, trimyristin, yellow wax, hard fat or fat that is useful as suppository bases, anhydrous dairy fats, lanolin, glyceryl palmitostearate, glyceryl stearate, lauryl macrogol glycerides, polyglyceryl diisostearate, diethylene glycol monostearate, ethylene glycol monostearate, omega 3 fatty acids, and mixtures thereof. A particularly preferred subgroup of products comprises hydrogenated cottonseed oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, hydrogenated palm oil, glyceryl behenate, hydrogenated castor oil, candelilla wax, tristearin, tripalmitin, trimyristin, beeswax, hydrogenated poly-1 decene, carnauba wax, and mixtures thereof.
In practice, and without this being limiting, it is preferable the hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. to be chosen from the group of products sold underthe following trademarks: Dynasan™, Cutina™, Hydrobase™, Dub™ Castorwax™, Croduret™, Compritol™, Sterotex™, Lubritab™, Apifil™, Akofine™ Softisan™, Hydrocote™, Livopol™, Super Hartolan™, MGLA™, Corona™, Protalan™ Akosoft™, Akosol™, Cremao™, Massupol™, Novata™, Suppocire™, Wecobee™ Witepsol™, Lanolin™, Jncromega™, Estaram™, Suppoweiss™, Gelucire™, Precirol™ Emulcire™, Plurol diisostéarique™, Geleol™, Hydrine™, Monthyle™, Kahlwax™ and mixtures thereof; and, preferably, from the group of products sold under the following trademarks: Dynasan™P60, Dynasan™114, Dynasan™116, Dynasan™118, Cutina™ HR, Hydrobase™ 66-68, Dub™ HPH, Compritol™ 888, Sterotex™ NF, Sterotex™ K, Lubritab™, and mixtures thereof.
A particularly suitable coating is composed of a mixture of hydrogenated vegetable oil and a methacrylic acid copolymer. The exact structure and amount of each component, and the amount of coating applied to the particle, controls the release rate and release triggers. Eudragit® methacrylic acid copolymers, namely the methacrylic acid—methyl methacrylate copolymers and the methacrylic acid—ethyl acrylate copolymers, have a pH-dependent solubility: typically, the pH triggering the release of the active ingredient from the microparticles is set by the choice and mixture of appropriate Eudragit® polymers. In the case of gamma hydroxybutyrate modified release microparticles, the theoretical pH triggering the release is preferably from 5.5 to 6.97 or 6.9, more preferably 6.5 up to 6.9. By “pH trigger” is meant the minimum pH above which dissolution of the polymer occurs.
In a particular embodiment, the coating comprises a hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. and a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups are present in a weight ratio from 0.4 or 0.5 to 4, preferably from 0.6 or 0.67 to 2.5, most preferably from 0.6 or 0.67 to 2.33; most preferably about 1.5.
A particularly suitable coating is composed of a mixture of hydrogenated vegetable oil and a methacrylic acid copolymer with a theoretical pH triggering the release from 6.5 up to 6.97 in a weight ratio from 0.4 or 0.5 to 4, preferably from 0.6 or 0.67 to 2.5, most preferably from 0.6 or 0.67 to 2.33; most preferably of about 1.5.
The modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate preferably have a volume mean diameter of from 100 to 1200 microns, from 100 to 500 microns, from 200 to 800 microns, and preferably of about 320 microns.
The coating can preferably represent 10 to 50%, 15 to 45%, 20 to 40%, or 25 to 35% by weight of the total weight of the coated modified release particles. Preferably, the coating represents 25-30% by weight of the total weight of the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In a preferred embodiment, the coating layer of the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is obtained by spraying, in particular in a fluidized bed apparatus, a solution, suspension or dispersion comprising the coating composition as defined previously onto the immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, in particular the immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate as previously described. Preferably, the coating is formed by spraying in a fluidized bed equipped with a Wurster or partition tube and according to an upward spray orientation or bottom spray a solution of the coating excipients in hot isopropyl alcohol.
According to a preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to a preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to a preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of sodium oxybate.
According to a preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of sodium oxybate.
According to another preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another preferred embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
Packaging
The modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is preferably supplied in sachets or stick-packs comprising a particulate formulation. The sachets are preferably available in several different doses, comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in amounts equivalents to 0.5 g, 1.0 g, 1.5 g, 3.0 g, 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g, 9.0 g, 10.5 g and/or 12 g of sodium oxybate. Depending on the dose required, one or more of these sachets can be opened, and its contents mixed with tap water to provide the nightly dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
Methods of Treatment
The invention further provides a method of treating a disorder treatable with gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a human subject in need thereof comprising orally administering a single bedtime daily dose to said human amounts of gamma-hydroxybutyrate equivalent to from 3.0 to 12.0 g of sodium oxybate in the formulation of the present invention. The invention further provides methods of treating narcolepsy, types 1 and/or 2, by orally administering at bedtime a therapeutically effective amount of a gamma-hydroxybutyrate formulation characterized by the novel gamma-hydroxybutyrate pharmacokinetics or dissolution properties of the present invention. The modified release formulation of the present invention is effective to treat narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2, wherein said treatment of narcolepsy is defined as reducing excessive daytime sleepiness or reducing the frequency of cataplectic attacks. The therapeutically effective amount preferably comprises equivalents from 3.0 to 12.0 g of sodium oxybate, more preferably from to 9.0 g of sodium oxybate, and most preferably 4.5, 6.0, 7.5 or 9.0 g of sodium oxybate. The effectiveness of the treatment can be measured by one or any combination of the following criteria:
In a preferred embodiment, the treatment of the present invention is superior, as measured by any one or combination of the foregoing criteria, to an equal dose administered twice nightly of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, with the second dose administered 4 hours after the first dose.
The invention further provides a method of treatment of narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2 wherein, compared to a dosing regimen consisting of administering half the dose at t0 and another half of the dose at t4h of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, a single bedtime daily dose administration of a therapeutically effective amount of the formulation of the invention has been shown to produce less confusion, less depressive syndrome, less incontinence, less nausea or less sleepwalking.
In one additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the formulation releases (a) at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a second additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 10% to 65% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a third additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases 10% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a fourth additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the formulation releases (a) at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 40% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a fifth additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hour 3 when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 40% to 65% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a sixth additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases 40% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a seventh additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, preferably comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein the formulation releases (a) at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (b) from 40% to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In an eighth additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases from 40% to 65% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (c) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
In a ninth additional embodiment, the invention provides a modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, comprising immediate release and modified release portions, wherein (a) the formulation releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (b) the formulation releases 40 to 65%, of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour and at three hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, (c) the formulation releases greater than 60% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 10 hours when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38<711> in 900 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm, and (d) the modified release portion releases greater than 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at 3 hours in a dissolution test started in 750 mL of 0.1N hydrochloric acid for 2 hours then switched to 950 mL 0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8 at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
Tables 1a-1d provide the qualitative and quantitative compositions of sodium oxybate IR microparticles, MR microparticles, and mixtures of IR and MR microparticles. The physical structure of the microparticles showing the qualitative and quantitative composition of the IR and MR microparticles is depicted in
Briefly, sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone K30-Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 270 microns were obtained.
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), were dissolved in 1542.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely onto 400.0 g of the sodium oxybate IR microparticles described above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature of 48° C., spraying rate around 11 g per min and atomization pressure of 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR microparticles with mean volume diameter of about 320 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 353.36 g of the above IR microparticles, 504.80 g of the above MR microparticles, 14.27 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 6.34 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 9.51 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.51 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 4.51 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.11 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
An alternative formulation to the formulation described in example 1 is described in Example 1 bis.
Sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared by coating the IR microparticles described in example 1 with a top coat layer. Microparticles were prepared as follows: 170.0 of hydroxypropyl cellulose (Klucel™ EF Pharm from Hercules) were solubilized in 4080.0 g of acetone. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 1530.0 g of the IR microparticles of Example 1 in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 298 microns were obtained (see Table 1 bis-a).
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as described in example 1 (see Table 1b).
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles based on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 412.22 g of the above IR microparticles, 530.00 g of the above MR microparticles, 29.96 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 4.96 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 4.96 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Degussa) and 9.92 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.45 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose in an immediate-release fraction and half of the dose in a modified release fraction) were weighed (see Table 1 bis-b and 1 bis-c).
Compared to the finished composition described in example 1, this alternative composition has the following characteristics: same MR microparticles, same IR microparticles but with a top coat, increased amount of malic acid, only one suspending agent (xanthan gum) and presence of a glidant.
Finished compositions from Example 1 and 1 bis exhibit substantially the same in-vitro dissolution profiles (see
Dissolution Testing of IR Microparticles
The dissolution profile of 2786 mg of IR microparticles of Example 1, corresponding to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel, was determined in 0.1N HCl dissolution medium using a USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 100 rpm. The release profile of the IR microparticles is shown in
The dissolution profile of 3096 mg of IR microparticles of Example 1 bis, corresponding to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel, was determined in 0.1N HCl dissolution medium using a USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 100 rpm. The release profile of the IR microparticles is shown in
49.1 g of MR microparticles from Example 1 were mixed with 0.5 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Graven) and 0.25 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Evonik). The dissolution profile of 4040 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm.
After 2 hours in 750 mL of 0.1N HCl medium, 6.5 g of monobasic potassium phosphate was added to the dissolution vessel. pH and volume were then respectively adjusted to 6.8 and 950 mL, as needed by the addition of NaOH and water. The potassium phosphate concentration was equal to 0.05 M in the dissolution medium after pH and volume adjustment.
The release profile of the MR microparticles is shown in
The dissolution profile of the quantity equivalent to 4.5 g sodium oxybate of the finished composition according Example 1 was determined in 900 mL of deionized water using the USP apparatus 2. The dissolution medium was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C. and the rotating paddle speed was fixed at 50 rpm. The release profile is shown in
An overlay of the release profile of the finished formulation of Example 1 versus that reported in USP 2012/0076865
Release Testing of Different Batches of MR Microparticles and Finished Dosage Forms
In vitro release profiles obtained in 900 mL of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium for different batches of modified release (MR) microparticles prepared according to Example 1 are described below in Table 2e. The dissolution profile of 4040 mg of microparticles corresponding to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel is determined using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 100 rpm.
In vitro release profiles obtained in 0.1N HCl for three batches of finished composition comprising IR (50% w/w sodium oxybate dose) and MR microparticles (50% w/w sodium oxybate dose), prepared as described in Example 1, are provided in Table 2f. The sodium oxybate dose per vessel was 4.5 g, 6 g and 7.5 g respectively and dissolution was determined in 900 mL of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium using the USP apparatus 2. The dissolution medium was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C. and the rotating paddle speed was fixed at 100 rpm. Single dose units were poured in a container containing 50 mL of tap water. After 5 minutes, the suspension was poured in the dissolution vessel containing 840 mL of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium. 10 mL of water were used to rinse the container and were added to the dissolution vessel.
Release Testing of MR Microparticles and Finished Compositions—Effect of Paddle Speed:
Single dose units were poured in a container containing 50 mL of tap water. After 5 minutes, the suspension was poured in the dissolution vessel containing 840 mL of 0.1N HCl medium. 10 mL of water were used to rinse the container and were added to the dissolution vessel.
Pharmacokinetic testing was undertaken in vivo in healthy human volunteers according to the principles described in FDA's March 2003 Guidance for Industry on BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES FOR ORALLY ADMINISTERED DRUG PRODUCTS—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. All testing was performed in subjects two hours after eating a standardized dinner. Xyrem® doses were administered in two equipotent doses four hours apart. All other tested doses were manufactured as described in Example 1 bis. The standardized dinner consisted of 25.5% fat, 19.6% protein, and 54.9% carbohydrates.
The finished composition of Example 1 bis given as a 4.5 g once-nightly dose rather than a standard Xyrem® dosing twice (2×2.25 g) nightly 4 hours apart, produced a dramatically different pharmacokinetic profile than Xyrem® as shown in
The pharmacokinetic profile of a single 6 g dose of finished composition produced according to Example 1 bis was also tested and found to have a similar pharmacokinetic profile as the 4.5 g dose.
Tables 4a-4d provide the qualitative and quantitative compositions of IR microparticles, MR microparticles, and mixtures of IR and MR microparticles. The physical structure of the microparticles showing the qualitative and quantitative composition of the IR and MR microparticles is depicted in
Briefly, sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticle were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone K30-Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 270 microns were obtained.
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as follows: 4.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55), 49.3 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100), 80 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), were dissolved in 1200.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR microparticles prepared above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 330 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contained a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 27.86 g of IR microparticles, 37.15 g of MR microparticles, 1.13 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 0.50 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 0.75 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 0.75 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 0.34 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 6.85 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g sodium oxybate dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
An alternative formulation to example 4 is described in example 4 bis. Sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared by coating the IR microparticles described in example 4 with a top coat layer. IR Microparticles were prepared as follows: 170.0 of hydroxypropyl cellulose (Kluce™ EF Pharm from Hercules) were solubilized in 4080.0 g of acetone. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 1530.0 g of the IR microparticles of Example 4 in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 298 microns were obtained (see Table 4 bis-a).
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as described in example 4 (see Table 4b).
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated based on sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 424.99 g of the above IR microparticles, 509.98 g of the above MR microparticles, 30.89 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 4.93 g of xanthan gum (Xantural 75 from Kelco), 4.93 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Degussa) and 9.86 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.18 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as an immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as a modified release fraction) were weighed. (see Tables 4 bis-b and 4 bis-c).
Compared to the finished composition described in example 4, this alternative composition has the following characteristics: same MR microparticles, same IR microparticles but with a top coat, increased amount of malic acid, only one suspending agent (xanthan gum) and presence of a glidant.
49.1 g of MR microparticles from Example 4 were mixed with 0.5 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) and 0.25 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Evonik).
The dissolution profile of 3770 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm.
After 2 hours in 750 mL of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium, 6.5 g of monobasic potassium phosphate was added in the dissolution vessel. pH and volume were then respectively adjusted to 6.8 and 950 mL. The potassium phosphate concentration was equal to 0.05 M in the dissolution medium after pH and volume adjustment. The release profile is shown in
The sodium oxybate was not released in the 0.1N HCl medium during two hours. After the switch at pH 6.8, 40% of the API was released after 30 minutes and 90% of API after 1 hour.
The dissolution profile of the quantity equivalent to 4.5 g of sodium oxybate of the finished composition of the Example 4 was determined in 900 mL of deionized water using the USP apparatus 2. The dissolution medium was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C. and the rotating paddle speed was set at 50 rpm. The release profile of is shown in
The IR fraction of sodium oxybate was solubilized in 15 minutes. The release of sodium oxybate from the modified release fraction started after 5 hours with 90% of the total dose released at 8 hours.
An overlay of the release profile of the finished composition of the Example 4 versus that reported in USP 2012/0076865
Table 5d. Percent Sodium Oxybate Released in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 Dissolution Medium for finished composition prepared according to Example 4 bis Time (Hour) Example 4 bis
Pharmacokinetic testing was undertaken in vivo in healthy human volunteers according to the principles described in FDA's March 2003 Guidance for Industry on BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES FOR ORALLY ADMINISTERED DRUG PRODUCTS—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. All testing was performed in subjects two hours after eating a standardized dinner. Xyrem® doses were administered in two equipotent doses four hours apart. All other tested doses were manufactured as described in Example 4 bis. The standardized dinner consisted of 25.5% fat, 19.6% protein, and 54.9% carbohydrates.
The finished composition of Example 4 bis given as a 4.5 g once-nightly dose rather than a standard Xyrem® dosing twice (2×2.25 g) nightly 4 hours apart, produced a dramatically different pharmacokinetic profile than Xyrem® as shown in
The 4.5 g dose achieved a mean C8h equal to about 6.85 microgram/mL which represents approximately 74.1% of the C8h obtained for Xyrem® dosed 2×2.25 g. The ratio of AUC8h to AUCinf was about 0.89.
A formulation having an in vitro dissolution profile comparable to the formulation reported in FIG. 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,193,211 was prepared to confirm the in vitro/in vivo correlations reported herein. Tables 7a-7c provide the qualitative and quantitative compositions of the MR microparticles, and mixtures of IR and MR microparticles. The physical structure of the microparticles showing the qualitative and quantitative composition of the IR and MR microparticles is depicted in
Briefly, sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared according to Example 1 bis. Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared in two steps:
Step 1: 106.7 g of water insoluble polymer Ethylcellulose (Ethocel™ 20 Premium), 10.7 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Plasdone™ K30 from ISP), 10.7 g of castor oil (from Olvea) and 5.3 g of Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil (Kolliphor RH40 from BASF), were dissolved in a mixture of 828.0 g of acetone, 552.0 g of isopropanol and 153.3 g of water. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of immediate release microparticles of sodium oxybate prepared above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt G.P.C.G. 1.1 with inlet temperature 57° C., spraying rate around 14.5 g per min and atomization pressure 2.5 bar. Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 310 microns were obtained.
Step 2: 15.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 30.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 67.5 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), were dissolved in 1012.5 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 450.0 g of the above prepared microparticles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature 47° C., spraying rate around 10.5 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of 335 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 60:40 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated based on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 326.69 g of the above IR microparticles, 735.04 g of the above MR microparticles, 23.74 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 5.54 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 5.54 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Degussa) and 11.08 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 8.40 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with 40% of the dose as immediate-release fraction and 60% of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
The dissolution profile obtained for the MR microparticles in two sequential dissolution media (0.1N HCl for 2 hours then phosphate buffer pH 6.8) is shown in
The finished composition of Comparative Example 7 was tested in the same pharmacokinetic study than the finished composition of Example 1 and 4. As summarized below (Tables 7e), 4.5 g nighttime dose of finished composition of the comparative Example 7 compared to twice-nightly doses of Xyrem®(2×2.25 g) provided much less total exposure to sodium oxybate with a relative bioavailability of 67%.
The pharmacokinetic profiles of single 6 g and 7.5 g doses of the finished composition produced according to comparative Example 7 were also generated. Table 7 g provides data on a single 4.5 g, 6 g and 7.5 g dose, showing effects on Cmax, C8h, AUC8h and AUCinf related to dose strength.
Example 8.1: Modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and modified release microparticles of sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (sodium oxybate).
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid can be prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and 85.0 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone K30—Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP) are solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution is entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus.
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and 85.0 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone K30—Plasdone K29/32 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans Sanaq) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus.
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles are prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™L100-55), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), are dissolved in 1542.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution is sprayed entirely onto 400.0 g of the sodium oxybate IR microparticles described above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature of 48° C., spraying rate around 11 g per min and atomization pressure of 1.3 bar. MR microparticles are dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR microparticles with mean volume diameter of about 320 microns were obtained.
The finished formulation, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their gamma-hydroxybutyrate content, can be prepared as follows: 398.51 g of the above IR microparticles, 504.80 g of the above MR microparticles, 16.09 g of D/L malic acid, 6.34 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 9.51 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.51 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 4.75 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.49 g of the mixture (amount equivalent to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Example 8.2: Modified release formulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising immediate release microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, immediate release microparticles of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, immediate release microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and modified release microparticles of sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (sodium oxybate).
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid are prepared according to example 8.1.
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid can be prepared using the same manufacturing process by replacing the potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid by the same weight of respectively magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles are prepared according to example 8.1.
The finished formulation, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their gamma-hydroxybutyrate content, can be prepared as follows: 132.84 g of the IR microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 215.32 g of the IR microparticles of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 230.05 g of the IR microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 504.80 g of the MR microparticles of sodium oxybate, 23.35 g of D/L malic acid, 6.34 g of xanthan gum (Xantura™75 from Kelco), 9.51 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.51 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 5.69 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 8.96 g of the mixture (amount equivalent to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid are prepared according to example 8.1.
Immediate release (IR) microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid can be prepared using the manufacturing process described in example 8.1 for immediate release (IR) microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid by replacing the potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid by the same weight of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid. These Immediate release (IR) microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid are used to manufacture modified release (MR) microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), are dissolved in 1542.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution is sprayed entirely onto 400.0 g of the immediate release microparticles of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid described above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature of 48° C., spraying rate around 11 g per min and atomization pressure of 1.3 bar. MR microparticles are dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C.
The finished formulation, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their gamma-hydroxybutyrate content, can be prepared as follows: 398.53 g of the IR microparticles of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 492.87 g of the MR microparticles of sodium oxybate, 16.10 g of D/L malic acid, 6.34 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 9.51 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.51 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 4.69 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.39 g of the mixture (amount equivalent to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Different prototypes were developed to evaluate the effect of acidic agent on the dissolution stability of the formulation dispersed in water. Experimental data with 0.8%, 1.6% and 15% malic acid are detailed below.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 268 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 39.9 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 80.1 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 180.0 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 2700.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 700.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 49° C., spraying rate around 11.6 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 324 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 655.1 g of the above IR particles, 936.4 g of the above MR particles, 26.5 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 11.7 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 17.6 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 17.6 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 8.2 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.11 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 273 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 39.9 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 80.1 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 180.0 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 2700.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 700.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 47° C., spraying rate around 10.7 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 60° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 309 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 100.0 g of the above IR particles, 142.9 g of the above MR particles, 2.0 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 1.2 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 1.2 g of hydrophilic fumed silica (Aerosil™ 200 from Degussa) and 2.5 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.93 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 255 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1544.8 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 49° C., spraying rate around 12.0 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 298 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 36.2 g of the above IR particles, 51.8 g of the above MR particles, 16.1 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 0.7 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 1.0 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 1.0 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 0.6 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 8.25 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Suspending agents are present in the formulation to limit microparticles settling after reconstitution. Without suspending agents, microparticles starts settling as soon as shaking stops. In presence of the suspending agents, full microparticles settling does not occur in less than 1 minute. The following data illustrates the good pourability of the suspension assessed by the high recovery of sodium oxybate content in the dissolution test:
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 271 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 39.9 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 80.1 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 180.0 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 2700.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 700.0 g of sodium oxybate IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11.5 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR coated particles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR particles of sodium oxybate with mean diameter of 321 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR sodium oxybate particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 634.0 g of the above IR particles, 907.6 g of the above MR particles, 25.7 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 11.4 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 17.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 17.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 8.1 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 14.20 g (corresponding to a 9 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Different prototypes were prepared and evaluated to determine the effect of MI/MR ratio.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1896.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1264.4 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 275 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1543.1 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 47° C., spraying rate around 10.8 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 330 microns were obtained.
17.1 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.09 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH) using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profiles are shown in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 15% of the dose as IR fraction and 85% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 11c.
The finished composition, which contains a 85:15 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, can be prepared as follows: 100.0 g of the above IR particles, 809.5 g of the above MR particles, 4.0 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 6.0 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 9.0 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.0 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 4.7 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.88 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with 15% of the dose as immediate-release fraction and 85% of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
After reconstitution with 50 ml of tap water and a rinsing volume of 10 ml of tap water, the finished composition will display the dissolution profiles in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.1 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1903.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1267.1 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 268 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 36.6 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 32.1 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 103.0 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1543.5 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 12.0 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR particles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 323 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of sodium oxybate MR particles were mixed with 0.09 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4050 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2280 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile in 0.1N HCl is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 70:30 mixture of MR and IR sodium oxybate particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 92.1 g of the above IR particles, 306.5 g of the above MR particles, 7.5 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.8 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 2.0 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.62 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with 30% of the dose as immediate-release fraction and 70% of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 270 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1543.1 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 47° C., spraying rate around 10.8 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR coated particles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 330 microns were obtained.
Refer to the Example 11a for the dissolution profile of the MR microparticles. The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 65% of the dose as IR fraction and 35% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 11i.
The finished composition, which contains a 85:15 mixture of sodium oxybate MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, can be prepared as follows: 100.0 g of the above IR particles, 76.9 g of the above MR coated particles, 3.0 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 1.4 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 2.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 2.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 0.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.75 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with 65% of the dose as immediate-release fraction and 35% of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Dissolution profile: After reconstitution with 50 ml tap water and rinsing with 10 ml of tap water, the finished composition will display the dissolution profiles in
Prototype formulations were developed to test the impact of different manufacturing processes on the dissolution of the formulations.
IR particles to serve as cores of the MR coated microparticles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 256 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1542.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 10 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR particles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 308 microns were obtained.
25.2 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.26 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) and 0.13 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Evonik). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl dissolution medium using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile in 0.1N HCl is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of sodium oxybate MR coated particles and raw sodium oxybate as IR fraction calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 36 g of raw sodium oxybate, 63.7 g of the above MR coated particles, 1.8 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 1.6 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 2.4 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 0.047 g of an apple aroma and 0.3 g of hydrophilic fumed silica (Aerosil 200 from Degussa) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.66 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as raw sodium oxybate as IR fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Considering that the 0.1N HCl dissolution profile of the MR coated particles is similar to the MR microparticles from examples 1 and 1 bis, the dissolution profile in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer of the finished composition is expected to be similar to the profile depicted in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 97 g of sodium oxybate and 3 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were mixed with 7.5 g of water. The mixture was extruded through a 400 micron mesh and spheronized at 1500 rpm for 1.5 min in an extruder-spheronizer Fuji-Paudal MG-55. After drying for 4 hours at 45° C. in a ventilated oven, microparticles were sieved between 150 microns and 500 microns.
MR coated particles were prepared as described in Example 14.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR sodium oxybate particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 67.4 g of the above IR particles obtained by extrusion-spheronization, 115.6 g of the above MR coated particles, 3.3 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 0.9 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 0.9 g of hydrophilic fumed silica (Aerosil 200 from Degussa) and 1.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.54 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR coated particles in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer, finished compositions are expected to have the dissolution profile in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer given in Table 12d and
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1700.0 g of Sodium Oxybate are solubilized in 1899.4 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1261.3 g of water. The solution is entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 244 microns are obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 17.1 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit L100-55 from Evonik), 34.3 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit S100 from Evonik), 77.1 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab from JRS), are dissolved in 1157.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution is sprayed entirely on 300.0 g of IR particles prepared above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 10.7 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 289 microns are obtained.
25.3 g of MR coated microparticles were mixed with 0.12 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2368 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution with pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH) using the USP apparatus 2. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profiles are shown below in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 50% of the dose as IR fraction and 50% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 13c.
After reconstitution with 50 ml of tap water and rinsing with 10 ml of tap water, the finished composition is expected to provide the following dissolution profiles in
Different prototypes were also developed to evaluate the impact of the core size on the dissolution of the formulation.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 100 from Pharmatrans) (D[4,3]=160 microns) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 310 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 25.7 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 51.5 g of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 115.7 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1735.7 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 450.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 47° C., spraying rate around 9.6 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR particles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 370 microns were obtained.
49.3 g of sodium oxybate MR particles were mixed with 0.52 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) and 0.26 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Evonik). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which correspond to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH). Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 100 rpm. The release profile in 0.1N HCl and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer is shown below in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 50% of the dose as IR fraction and 5000 of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 14c.
After reconstitution with 50 ml of tap water and rinsing with 10 ml of tap water, the finished composition is expected to provide the dissolution profiles in
Different prototypes were developed to evaluate the effect of the ratio between Lubritab™ and Eudragit™ on the formulation.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 100 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 272 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 50.2 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 100.6 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 64.6 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1943.5 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11.0 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 403 microns were obtained.
17.9 g of sodium oxybate MR microparticles were mixed with 0.1 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4308 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile is shown in
Alternative MR coated particles of sodium oxybate were prepared according to the above manufacturing protocol with the coating level adjusted to 50% instead of 35%. The dissolution profile of the alternative sodium oxybate MR particles was determined using the same protocol as above. The 0.1N HCl dissolution profile is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR sodium oxybate particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 153.3 g of the above IR microparticles, 235.8 g of the above sodium oxybate MR microparticles with a coating level of 30%, 6.2 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.7 g of xanthan gum (Xantura™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH109 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 2.0 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.42 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 665.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 35.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 781.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 521.6 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Celphere™ CP203 from Asahi Kasei—mean diameter D[4,3]=250 microns) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 398 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 37.6 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 75.4 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 48.5 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1458.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 300.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11.7 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 491 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.08 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 5210 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH). Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile is shown in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 5000 of the dose as IR fraction and 50% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 15f.
After reconstitution, the finished composition is expected to exhibit the dissolution profiles in
IR pellets were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1903.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1267.1 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 268 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 40.6 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 80.1 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 80.5 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1799.4 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 300.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 10.5 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 348 microns were obtained.
20.0 g of MR coated particles were mixed with 0.1 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4700 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium. Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 156.0 g of the above IR particles, 260.0 g of the above MR coated particles, 6.3 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.8 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.2 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.2 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 2.2 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.78 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.1 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.4 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 272 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 13.3 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 26.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 93.3 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1200.3 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 10.6 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 313 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of MR coated particles were mixed with 0.06 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 3750 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and pH6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH). Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 153.3 g of the above IR particles, 204.3 g of the above MR coated particles, 6.2 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.7 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 1.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.85 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR coated particles in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer, single dose units are expected to have the dissolution profile in pH6.8 buffer shown in
Prototypes with different hydrophobic coatings were prepared and evaluated to determine the effect of coating type on the dissolution of the formulations.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1903.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1267.1 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 268 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.9 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102; 9 g of glyceryl dibehenate (Compritol™ ATO 888 from Gattefossé), were dissolved in 1371.8 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11.7 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 322 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of MR coated particles were mixed with 0.1 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH). Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profile is shown in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 181.1 g of the above IR particles, 258.7 g of the above MR coated particles, 7.3 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 3.3 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.9 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.9 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 2.3 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.12 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR microparticles alone in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer, single dose units are expected to have the dissolution profile at pH6.8 shown in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.1 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.4 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 255 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 13.3 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 26.7 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 60.0 g of candelilla wax (Kahlwax™ 2039L from Brenntag), were dissolved in 902.2 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 12.8 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 289 microns were obtained.
21.2 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.11 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2570 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH). Dissolution medium temperature was maintained at 37.0±0.5° C., and the rotating paddle speed was set at 75 rpm. The release profiles are shown below in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 50% of the dose as IR fraction and 50% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 16 g.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, can be prepared as follows: 200.0 g of the above IR particles, 250.0 g of the above MR coated particles, 8.1 g of Malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 3.6 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 5.4 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 5.4 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 2.4 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.61 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
After reconstitution, the finished composition is expected to provide the dissolution profiles in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.1 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.4 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 270 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 20.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 40.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 40.0 g of candelilla wax (Kahlwax™ 2039L from Brenntag), were dissolved in 904.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 10.9 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 302 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.08 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 3500 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH) is given in
The qualitative composition of 4.5 g dose units comprising 50% of the dose as IR fraction and 50% of the dose as MR fraction is described in Table 16l.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 122.7 g of the above IR particles, 153.2 g of the above MR coated particles, 5.0 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.2 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 3.3 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 3.3 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 1.5 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 6.62 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR coated particles in pH6.8 phosphate buffer, 4.5 g single dose units of the finished compositions are expected to provide the dissolution profile in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer shown in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.1 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1898.7 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 272 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 45.8 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of cetyl alcohol (Kolliwax™ CA from BASF), were dissolved in 1472.5 g of isopropanol and 77.7 g of water at room temperature. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 14.5 g per min and atomization pressure 2.5 bar. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 315 microns were obtained.
16.4 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.08 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4000 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium is given in
Further prototypes were developed and evaluate to determine the effect of the Eudragit™ selected on the dissolution of the MR microparticles.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 285 microns were obtained.
Sodium oxybate IR seal-coated particles were prepared by coating the IR particles described above with a seal-coat layer: 170.0 g of hydroxypropylcellulose (Klucel™ EF Pharm from Hercules) were solubilized in 4080.0 g of acetone. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 1530.0 g of the above IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. Sodium oxybate IR particles with volume mean diameter of about 298 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 100.0 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 150.0 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 2250.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 750.0 g of the above IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 12.0 g per min and atomization pressure 1.6 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 307 microns were obtained.
The dissolution profile of 2100 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 1253 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 500 ml of 0.1N HCl medium is reported in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 425.0 g of the above IR seal-coated particles, 510.0 g of the above MR coated particles, 30.9 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 4.9 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 180 from CP Kelco), 4.9 g of Aerosil™ 200 (amorphous anhydrous colloidal silicon dioxide from Evonik) and 9.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.18 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.1 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1896.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1264.4 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 275 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 68.7 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 from Evonik), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1543.2 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 46° C., spraying rate around 12.7 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 328 microns were obtained.
17.0 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.09 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile in of 4000 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2250 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH) is given in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 153.3 g of the above IR particles, 219.0 g of the above MR coated particles, 6.2 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 2.8 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 4.1 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 4.1 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250M from Ashland) and 1.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.12 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR coated particles in pH6.8 phosphate buffer, 4.5 g single dose units of the finished compositions are expected to provide the dissolution profile in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer in
IR particles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of Sodium Oxybate and 85.0 g of water soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone—Plasdone™ K30 from ISP) were solubilized in 1903.2 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1267.1 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus GPCG1.1. Sodium oxybate IR particles with mean diameter of 268 microns were obtained.
MR coated particles were prepared as follows: 34.3 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type A (Eudragit™ L100 from Evonik), 34.3 g of Methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100 from Evonik), 102.9 g of Hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™ from JRS), were dissolved in 1543.0 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely on 400.0 g of IR particles in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus Glatt™ G.P.C.G.1.1 with inlet temperature 48° C., spraying rate around 11.8 g per min and atomization pressure 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for 2 hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. Sodium oxybate MR coated particles with mean diameter of 316 microns were obtained.
24.0 g of MR microparticles were mixed with 0.12 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven). The dissolution profile of 4050 mg of the mixture which corresponds to 2280 mg of sodium oxybate per vessel was determined using the USP apparatus 2 in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl medium and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (0.05M monobasic potassium phosphate solution—pH adjusted to 6.8 with 5N NaOH) is given in
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR particles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 223.0 g of the above IR particles, 318.4 g of the above MR coated particles, 11.2 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid regular from Bartek), 4.0 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from CP Kelco), 6.0 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 6.0 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol-M 250M from Ashland) and 2.9 g of magnesium stearate (from Peter Greven) were mixed in a Roue-Roehn mixer. Individual doses of 7.14 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
Based on the dissolution profile of the MR coated particles in pH6.8 phosphate buffer, 4.5 g single dose units of the finished composition are expected to have the dissolution profile in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer given in
Pharmacokinetic testing was undertaken in vivo in healthy human volunteers. Pharmacokinetic parameters were normalized by the dose. To assess the dose-proportionality, log-transformed dose-normalized PK parameters were pairwise compared according to the statistical methodology described in FDA's 2013 Draft Guidance entitled BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES WITH PHARMACOKINETIC ENDPOINTS FOR DRUGS SUBMITTED UNDER AN ANDA (2013). All testing was performed in subjects two hours after eating a standardized dinner. A test product with finished composition of Example 1 and manufactured at larger scale was administered in sequential ascending doses, 4.5 g, 7.5 g and 9 g, one week apart. The tested samples were manufactured as described in Table 1c for 4.5 g and quantities were homothetically adjusted for the other strengths. The dissolution profiles of the MR portions of the test product are presented in
AUC and Cmax values increased more than dose-proportionally with increasing doses of gamma-hydroxybutyrate formulated as the test product.
Table 18c compares the pharmacokinetic parameters AUCinf and C8h obtained for 4.5 g of the test product to the same parameters calculated 2×2.25 g, i.e. 4.5 g total dose of Xyrem®.
Table 18d compares the pharmacokinetic parameters AUCinf and C8h obtained for 7.5 g of the test product to the same parameters calculated 2×3.75 g, i.e. 7.5 g total dose of Xyrem®.
Table 18e compares the pharmacokinetic parameters AUCinf and C8h obtained for 7.5 g and 9 g of the test product to the same parameters calculated for 2×4.5 g, i.e. 9 g total dose of Xyrem®.
For the finished composition administered at 4.5 g, mean C6h, mean C7h are greater than, and mean C10h are less than, the mean C4h of the dose of Xyrem®. In addition, the ratio C3h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 1.03. The ratio C4h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.81. The ratio C4.5h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.69.
For the finished composition administered at 7.5 g, mean C6h, mean C7h are greater than, and mean C10h are less than, the mean C4h of the dose of Xyrem®. In addition, the ratio C3h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.77. The ratio C4h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.63. The ratio C4.5h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.57.
For the finished composition administered at 9 g, mean C6h, mean C7h are greater than, and mean C10h are less than, the mean C4h of the dose of Xyrem®. In addition, the ratio C3h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.84. The ratio C4h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.78. The ratio C4.5h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.63.
For the finished composition administered at 7.5 g compared to Xyrem® at 2×4.5 g, i.e. total dose of 9 g, the ratio C3h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.65. The ratio C4h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.53. The ratio C4.5h/Cmax(Xyrem®) is 0.47.
Throughout this application, various publications are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/527,633, filed Jul. 31, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/281,235, filed Feb. 21, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,736,866, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/655,924, filed Jul. 21, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,272,062, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/365,812, filed Jul. 22, 2016, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/399,413, filed Sep. 25, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/474,330, filed Mar. 21, 2017.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3051619 | Marie et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3419588 | De et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3765680 | Paraskevas et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 4221778 | Raghunathan | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4374441 | Carter et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4393236 | Klosa | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4510128 | Khanna | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4524217 | Davenport et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4687662 | Schobel | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4738985 | Kluger et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4916161 | Patell | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4939949 | Angenberg | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4976351 | Mangini et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4983632 | Gessa et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5294430 | Borch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5326856 | Coughlin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5364842 | Justice et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380937 | Koehler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5415870 | Gergely et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5424218 | Miljanich et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426120 | Crepaldi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5449761 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5527885 | Coughlin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5578288 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578484 | Horoszewicz | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5585468 | Coughlin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587454 | Justice et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593656 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594030 | Conte et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5753708 | Koehler et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758095 | Albaum et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763202 | Horoszewicz | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5795864 | Amstutz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5833599 | Schrier et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840331 | Van Cauter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845255 | Mayaud | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5891849 | Amstutz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5955106 | Moeckel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5990162 | Scharf | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6014631 | Teagarden et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022562 | Autant et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6054429 | Bowersox et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067524 | Byerly et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6103292 | Del Vecchio | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112182 | Akers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6184205 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6255307 | Cox et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6317719 | Schrier et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322819 | Burnside et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6356873 | Teagarden et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361938 | O'Mahony et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6384020 | Flanner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6432920 | Sparks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436430 | Mulye | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436998 | Cacciaglia et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6461197 | Crane, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6472431 | Cook et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6472432 | Perricone | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6495598 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6565872 | Wu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6599905 | Cox et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6638522 | Mulye | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6699973 | O'Mahony et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6703362 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6780889 | Cook et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6803464 | Edney et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6913768 | Couch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7015200 | Mamelak et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7072840 | Mayaud | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7135457 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7238367 | Tardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7262219 | Cook et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268109 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7524812 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7566766 | D'Mahony et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568822 | Ibrahim | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7572605 | Mamelak et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7668730 | Reardan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7683024 | Chan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7709445 | Soula et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7744921 | Tardi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7765106 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765107 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7797171 | Reardan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7833973 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842676 | Janoff et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7850090 | Ollendick | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7851506 | Cook et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7879362 | Castan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7895059 | Reardan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7906145 | Castan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7956030 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7977307 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8022279 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8062667 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8084045 | Pouliquen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8092828 | Louie et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101209 | Egrand et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8193211 | Liang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8202537 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8202542 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8263125 | Vaya et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8263650 | Cook et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268774 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8287848 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8287903 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8324275 | Cook et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8337890 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8431806 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8445023 | Guimberteau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8457988 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8461197 | Tung | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8461203 | Cook et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8465765 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8486924 | Ansell et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8491935 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8507003 | Jorda et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512688 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8513198 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8518437 | Tardi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8529954 | Lebon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8563033 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8589182 | Reardan et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8591922 | Allphin et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8597684 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8598191 | Liang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8609651 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8623409 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8652523 | Guimberteau et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8652529 | Guimberteau et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8653033 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8679540 | Bonnet-Gonnet et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8680228 | Guo et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8707348 | Sakhartov et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8716279 | Jamieson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8731963 | Reardan et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8734850 | Castan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8747902 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8759394 | Tung et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8765178 | Parikh et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8771735 | Rourke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8772306 | Eller | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8778301 | Mamelak et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8778390 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8778398 | Rourke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8790700 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8821935 | Guimberteau et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8859619 | Cook et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8883217 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8901173 | Allphin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8916202 | Lebon et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8952029 | Eller | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8952062 | Cook et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8956649 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8999386 | Tu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 8999392 | Suplie et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9023400 | Guimberteau et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9040083 | Mehta et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9050302 | Eller | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9132107 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9180100 | Tu et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9180104 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9198864 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9226910 | Khayrallah et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9271931 | Tardi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9295642 | Tu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9359290 | Khayrallah et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9408823 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9427429 | Gray | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9486426 | Eller | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9522191 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9539330 | Cook et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9545399 | Tu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9549989 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9555017 | Allphin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9561179 | Castan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9585863 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9649291 | Khayrallah et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9675703 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9675704 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9707270 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9770514 | Ghebre-Sellassie et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9795567 | Rourke et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9801852 | Allphin | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9814684 | Castan et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9844544 | Tu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9844545 | Tu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| RE46686 | Bonnet-Gonnet et al. | Jan 2018 | E |
| 9867797 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9920311 | Abribat | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9943488 | Suplie et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 10004693 | Castan et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10028912 | Cabral-Lilly et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10052289 | Meyrueix et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10058507 | Tardi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| RE47084 | Castan et al. | Oct 2018 | E |
| 10086087 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10092511 | Castan et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10105341 | Khayrallah et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10172958 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10174302 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
| 10183939 | Bingham et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10195151 | Allphin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10195168 | Allphin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10213400 | Eller | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10259780 | Khayrallah et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10272062 | Megret et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10307463 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10398662 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2019 | B1 |
| 10457627 | Xiang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10501401 | Xiang et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10507203 | Tu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10512609 | Allphin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10618886 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
| 10640451 | Xiang et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10640476 | Xiang et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10668163 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10675258 | Allphin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10683262 | Kiang et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10710958 | Hurley et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10730853 | Xiang et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10736866 | Megret et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10758488 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10774031 | Xiang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10813885 | Allphin et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
| 10829443 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10836714 | Xiang et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10857143 | Tu et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10858394 | Xiang et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10864181 | Eller | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10882832 | Xiang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10889572 | Xiang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10903276 | Chan et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10905775 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10912754 | Carter et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10925844 | Grassot et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10933143 | Mehta et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10940133 | Zomorodi | Mar 2021 | B1 |
| 10941107 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10952986 | Megret et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10959956 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10959976 | Carter et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10966931 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10968202 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10973795 | Megret et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10987310 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11000498 | Megret et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11033530 | Allphin | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11046946 | Abribat | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11052061 | Megret et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11065224 | Megret et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11072579 | Khayrallah et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11077079 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
| 11090269 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
| 11147782 | Allphin et al. | Oct 2021 | B1 |
| 11207270 | Allphin et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11364215 | Allphin et al. | Jun 2022 | B1 |
| 11400052 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
| 11400065 | Grassot et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
| 11504347 | Grassot et al. | Nov 2022 | B1 |
| 11583510 | Grassot et al. | Feb 2023 | B1 |
| 11602512 | Dubow et al. | Mar 2023 | B1 |
| 11602513 | Dubow et al. | Mar 2023 | B1 |
| 20020077334 | Cook et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030091632 | Campbell et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180249 | Khanna et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040092455 | Mamelak et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20050031688 | Ayala | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037077 | Legrand et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113366 | Bourguignon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142192 | Benjamin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050158384 | Couch et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181050 | Hirsh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239838 | Edgar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244496 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060018933 | Vaya et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024365 | Vaya et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069040 | Mamelak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078614 | Venkatesh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060182805 | Pfeiffer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204575 | Feng et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210630 | Liang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060228410 | Dumont et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070270491 | Cook et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080003267 | Spencer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080004329 | Jamieson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020039 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069871 | Vaughn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080085304 | Baichwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118571 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146549 | Coleman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226564 | Weers et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292700 | Nghiem et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293698 | Johnson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090137565 | Frucht | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155357 | Muhuri | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220611 | Dargelas et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317355 | Roth et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100112056 | Rourke et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100159001 | Cardinal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100160363 | Cardinal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172989 | Roth et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100266701 | Guimberteau et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110034727 | Luchi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039929 | Cook et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091537 | Castan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111027 | Rourke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119085 | Reardan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213004 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213298 | Pinnisi | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223241 | Tardi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293729 | Ebon et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120020833 | Cook et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076865 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120148672 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120164228 | Suplie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120202879 | Cook et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120202880 | Cook et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120207843 | Lebon et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130012565 | Tung et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130064814 | Gray | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130143965 | Cook et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230587 | Pilgaonkar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267595 | Cook et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130273159 | Howard et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130337078 | Mayer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140004202 | Suplie et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140037745 | Liang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140072624 | Jung et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140093578 | Mehta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127306 | Mehta et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141090 | Wilson | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171506 | Allphin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188504 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207480 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207481 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231300 | Mogna | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140256709 | Glozman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271896 | Abu Shmeis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275244 | Khayrallah et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140294916 | Tu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296830 | Gibson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316796 | Cox | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348917 | Rourke et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371153 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150005334 | Shah et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150018414 | Khayrallah et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073052 | Cook et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182469 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150328168 | Daviaud-Venet et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160058704 | Tardi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160068463 | Peoples et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143854 | Tu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160154947 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160180058 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228379 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271070 | Singh et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310478 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160326086 | Tung et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338966 | Guimberteau et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346200 | Sommer et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346216 | Chen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170042873 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170042874 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119627 | Bhargava et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224825 | Cook et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170319566 | Tu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340519 | Bhargava et al. | Nov 2017 | A9 |
| 20180000954 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180008539 | Singh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180021284 | Megret et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180042855 | Rourke et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180193277 | Suplie et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180200221 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180228822 | Krouse et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180263936 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180280357 | Maricich | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180318222 | Allphin et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180346900 | Abribat | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190015389 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190099395 | Khayrallah et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190151460 | Mehta et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190169589 | Friedrich et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190183806 | Guillard | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190183836 | Megret et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190194120 | Kiang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190218168 | Xiang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269640 | Megret et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269641 | Megret et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190274990 | Megret et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190282532 | Megret et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190328882 | Cook et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20200085748 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200113840 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200113853 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200163926 | Nelson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200163943 | Maricich et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200197347 | Megret et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200197377 | Maricich | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200239416 | Kiang et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200261489 | Dimitrova et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200276142 | Grassot et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200290955 | Hurley et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200330393 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200338029 | Allphin et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200360293 | Guillard | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200360319 | Grassot et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200368187 | Grassot et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200369599 | Xiang et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200375995 | Sudhakar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200385367 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210015744 | Jain et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210015745 | Jain et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210020317 | Lillaney | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210032199 | Xiang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210038588 | Tu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210038734 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210047367 | Xiang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210053912 | Hurley | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210061791 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210069105 | Jain et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210069136 | Jain et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210077450 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210087177 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093575 | Rourke et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093603 | Hurley | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093623 | Tu et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210094925 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210121423 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210128502 | Eller | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210162055 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210186907 | Skobieranda | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210187004 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210205227 | Allphin et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210205257 | Carter et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210212970 | Eller | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210213007 | Tu et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210244670 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210267928 | Megret et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210361601 | Skobieranda | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20220016066 | Megret et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 062556 | Nov 2008 | AR |
| 063201 | Jan 2009 | AR |
| 109376 | Nov 2018 | AR |
| 112403 | Oct 2019 | AR |
| 536867 | Dec 2011 | AT |
| 775523 | Aug 2004 | AU |
| 2007269896 | Jan 2008 | AU |
| 2006214454 | May 2011 | AU |
| 2007290589 | Apr 2012 | AU |
| 2011359405 | Aug 2013 | AU |
| 2011232408 | Jul 2015 | AU |
| 2007227569 | Apr 2016 | AU |
| 2010352575 | Nov 2016 | AU |
| 2013359114 | Jan 2017 | AU |
| 2013302657 | Aug 2018 | AU |
| 2014248849 | Aug 2018 | AU |
| 2014223373 | Dec 2018 | AU |
| 2014240988 | Jan 2019 | AU |
| 2017202955 | Jan 2019 | AU |
| 2017300845 | Jan 2019 | AU |
| 2017324855 | Mar 2019 | AU |
| 2018278332 | Jan 2020 | AU |
| 2018287145 | Feb 2020 | AU |
| 2018309068 | Feb 2020 | AU |
| 2015314007 | Mar 2020 | AU |
| 2018312328 | Mar 2020 | AU |
| 2017406159 | May 2020 | AU |
| 2018375183 | Jun 2020 | AU |
| 2018389797 | Jun 2020 | AU |
| 2018388577 | Jul 2020 | AU |
| 2019206950 | Aug 2020 | AU |
| 2016328150 | Oct 2020 | AU |
| 2019252790 | Oct 2020 | AU |
| 2019383389 | May 2021 | AU |
| 2019283096 | Jul 2021 | AU |
| 2019420189 | Jul 2021 | AU |
| 2020231916 | Aug 2021 | AU |
| 9916063 | Jan 2002 | BR |
| PI0607003 | Jul 2009 | BR |
| PI0713801 | Nov 2012 | BR |
| PI0714907 | Aug 2014 | BR |
| 112015014007 | Jul 2017 | BR |
| 112015021403 | Jul 2017 | BR |
| 112013020537 | Sep 2017 | BR |
| 112019000848 | Apr 2019 | BR |
| 112019004479 | Jul 2019 | BR |
| 112015021012 | Nov 2019 | BR |
| 112015003120 | Dec 2019 | BR |
| 112019020464 | Apr 2020 | BR |
| 112019025286 | Jun 2020 | BR |
| 112020002289 | Jul 2020 | BR |
| 112019027479 | Sep 2020 | BR |
| 112020010976 | Nov 2020 | BR |
| 112020012417 | Nov 2020 | BR |
| 112020020865 | Jan 2021 | BR |
| 112020014189 | Feb 2021 | BR |
| 112012028035 | May 2021 | BR |
| PI0709606 | May 2021 | BR |
| 112021006027 | Jun 2021 | BR |
| 2217902 | Jan 1999 | CA |
| 2112663 | Apr 2002 | CA |
| 2510289 | Jul 2004 | CA |
| 2597910 | Aug 2006 | CA |
| 2654383 | Jan 2008 | CA |
| 2662197 | Mar 2008 | CA |
| 2423358 | May 2011 | CA |
| 2786819 | Jul 2011 | CA |
| 2880456 | Feb 2014 | CA |
| 2904045 | Oct 2014 | CA |
| 2917702 | Jan 2015 | CA |
| 2645855 | Feb 2015 | CA |
| 2540895 | Aug 2016 | CA |
| 2999367 | Mar 2017 | CA |
| 2798178 | Jun 2017 | CA |
| 2894876 | Aug 2017 | CA |
| 2740146 | Nov 2017 | CA |
| 3028878 | Jan 2018 | CA |
| 3036068 | Mar 2018 | CA |
| 3036071 | Mar 2018 | CA |
| 3039045 | Apr 2018 | CA |
| 2794171 | Jul 2018 | CA |
| 3056316 | Sep 2018 | CA |
| 2930900 | Oct 2018 | CA |
| 3058216 | Oct 2018 | CA |
| 3065522 | Dec 2018 | CA |
| 3068100 | Dec 2018 | CA |
| 3071544 | Feb 2019 | CA |
| 3071779 | Feb 2019 | CA |
| 2825991 | Mar 2019 | CA |
| 3083499 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3084120 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3085941 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3086153 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3097737 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3087912 | Jul 2019 | CA |
| 3095335 | Oct 2019 | CA |
| 2902948 | Dec 2019 | CA |
| 3102650 | Dec 2019 | CA |
| 3115122 | May 2020 | CA |
| 1236813 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 101132780 | Feb 2008 | CN |
| 101478952 | Jul 2009 | CN |
| 101400343 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 101528261 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102905688 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 102917697 | Feb 2013 | CN |
| 102946869 | Feb 2013 | CN |
| 102958930 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 103209966 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 103209967 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 102488652 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 105073106 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105188677 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 102917697 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 102946869 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105848650 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105025892 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 109789096 | May 2019 | CN |
| 109906078 | Jun 2019 | CN |
| 105873576 | Jul 2019 | CN |
| 109996540 | Jul 2019 | CN |
| 110049966 | Jul 2019 | CN |
| 10638805 | Jan 2020 | CN |
| 110638804 | Jan 2020 | CN |
| 110709386 | Jan 2020 | CN |
| 111094238 | May 2020 | CN |
| 111132663 | May 2020 | CN |
| 111201014 | May 2020 | CN |
| 111278807 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111315878 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111317730 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111356699 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111511355 | Aug 2020 | CN |
| 111770914 | Oct 2020 | CN |
| 111818937 | Oct 2020 | CN |
| 111836798 | Oct 2020 | CN |
| 106866733 | Nov 2020 | CN |
| 112004520 | Nov 2020 | CN |
| 112004802 | Nov 2020 | CN |
| 112135812 | Dec 2020 | CN |
| 112236149 | Jan 2021 | CN |
| 112566902 | Mar 2021 | CN |
| 108283000 | Apr 2021 | CN |
| 106866784 | May 2021 | CN |
| 107108588 | Jun 2021 | CN |
| 113061089 | Jul 2021 | CN |
| 2020001873 | Apr 2020 | CO |
| 60129122 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 1278721 | Oct 2007 | DK |
| 2018160 | Feb 2012 | DK |
| 2428205 | Oct 2012 | DK |
| 2931268 | Feb 2018 | DK |
| 2961399 | Feb 2018 | DK |
| 2884961 | Apr 2019 | DK |
| 2675438 | May 2019 | DK |
| 2768484 | Oct 2019 | DK |
| 3335708 | Feb 2020 | DK |
| 3021838 | Aug 2020 | DK |
| 3335709 | Oct 2020 | DK |
| 0203768 | Dec 1986 | EP |
| 0235408 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0344704 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 0616804 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0635265 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0709087 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 0635265 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 1140061 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1140061 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1316309 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1278721 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 1853230 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 2032125 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2056877 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2068933 | Jun 2009 | EP |
| 2018160 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 1135150 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 2428205 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 2549987 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| 2968151 | Apr 2017 | EP |
| 2451486 | May 2017 | EP |
| 2760911 | Nov 2017 | EP |
| 2931268 | Nov 2017 | EP |
| 2961399 | Nov 2017 | EP |
| 1434572 | Dec 2017 | EP |
| 3353145 | Aug 2018 | EP |
| 2341910 | Sep 2018 | EP |
| 3418383 | Dec 2018 | EP |
| 2884961 | Mar 2019 | EP |
| 2675438 | Apr 2019 | EP |
| 3470067 | Apr 2019 | EP |
| 3487483 | May 2019 | EP |
| 2768484 | Jul 2019 | EP |
| 3353145 | Jul 2019 | EP |
| 3523275 | Aug 2019 | EP |
| 3572071 | Nov 2019 | EP |
| 3335708 | Dec 2019 | EP |
| 3595648 | Jan 2020 | EP |
| 3509581 | Apr 2020 | EP |
| 3642340 | Apr 2020 | EP |
| 3021838 | May 2020 | EP |
| 3509582 | May 2020 | EP |
| 3661484 | Jun 2020 | EP |
| 2566462 | Jul 2020 | EP |
| 3335709 | Aug 2020 | EP |
| 3695833 | Aug 2020 | EP |
| 3716997 | Oct 2020 | EP |
| 3727348 | Oct 2020 | EP |
| 3601235 | Nov 2020 | EP |
| 3737353 | Nov 2020 | EP |
| 3737665 | Nov 2020 | EP |
| 3740188 | Nov 2020 | EP |
| 3740189 | Nov 2020 | EP |
| 3668837 | Dec 2020 | EP |
| 3679051 | Dec 2020 | EP |
| 3773608 | Feb 2021 | EP |
| 3630072 | Mar 2021 | EP |
| 3661911 | Apr 2021 | EP |
| 3799867 | Apr 2021 | EP |
| 3802501 | Apr 2021 | EP |
| 2378573 | Apr 2012 | ES |
| 2396039 | Feb 2013 | ES |
| 2717469 | Jun 2019 | ES |
| 2721900 | Aug 2019 | ES |
| 922029 | Mar 1963 | GB |
| 2295390 | May 1996 | GB |
| 1156518 | Jun 2012 | HK |
| 1181639 | Nov 2013 | HK |
| 1201039 | Aug 2015 | HK |
| 1215181 | Aug 2016 | HK |
| 1215539 | Sep 2016 | HK |
| 1219236 | Mar 2017 | HK |
| 1256965 | Oct 2019 | HK |
| 1257965 | Nov 2019 | HK |
| 40002726 | Mar 2020 | HK |
| 40003964 | Apr 2020 | HK |
| 40009279 | Jun 2020 | HK |
| 40014757 | Aug 2020 | HK |
| 40027633 | Jan 2021 | HK |
| 40029219 | Feb 2021 | HK |
| 40029594 | Feb 2021 | HK |
| 40029856 | Feb 2021 | HK |
| 40031621 | Mar 2021 | HK |
| 40031646 | Mar 2021 | HK |
| 1182964 | Apr 2021 | HK |
| 1257033 | Apr 2021 | HK |
| 40033315 | Apr 2021 | HK |
| 40035049 | May 2021 | HK |
| 40038018 | Jun 2021 | HK |
| 201703439 | Apr 2017 | ID |
| 201906443 | Aug 2019 | ID |
| 201906490 | Aug 2019 | ID |
| 201907562 | Oct 2019 | ID |
| 143580 | May 2007 | IL |
| 194042 | Jun 2014 | IL |
| 239355 | May 2017 | IL |
| 222012 | Nov 2017 | IL |
| 222161 | Nov 2017 | IL |
| 227734 | Aug 2018 | IL |
| 236847 | May 2019 | IL |
| 240874 | Jun 2019 | IL |
| 241533 | Feb 2020 | IL |
| 275312 | Jul 2020 | IL |
| 275444 | Aug 2020 | IL |
| 265193 | Apr 2021 | IL |
| 200706499 | Sep 2007 | IN |
| 216331 | Mar 2008 | IN |
| 222233 | Aug 2008 | IN |
| 200808703 | May 2009 | IN |
| 200900401 | Jun 2009 | IN |
| 200901567 | Jun 2009 | IN |
| 201209462 | Jan 2016 | IN |
| 201505205 | Jul 2016 | IN |
| 201917009658 | Jun 2019 | IN |
| 201917013067 | Jun 2019 | IN |
| 201917017276 | Aug 2019 | IN |
| 342246 | Jul 2020 | IN |
| 342829 | Jul 2020 | IN |
| 202017008027 | Aug 2020 | IN |
| 202017008237 | Oct 2020 | IN |
| 202017045975 | Feb 2021 | IN |
| 361207 | Mar 2021 | IN |
| S5742651 | Mar 1982 | JP |
| S6212715 | Jan 1987 | JP |
| H0449212 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| H05508422 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| H06508839 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| H0753365 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| H08511257 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| H09104620 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| H10505604 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 2001513552 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002531515 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2004514732 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2006524207 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007521231 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007532689 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2008512386 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008519847 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008520633 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008528571 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2009526825 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| 2009532331 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 2011500865 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 2012507532 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012508784 | Apr 2012 | JP |
| 2013522373 | Jun 2013 | JP |
| 2014505094 | Feb 2014 | JP |
| 5479086 | Apr 2014 | JP |
| 5816091 | Nov 2015 | JP |
| 2016503002 | Feb 2016 | JP |
| 5925766 | May 2016 | JP |
| 5968300 | Aug 2016 | JP |
| 6215347 | Oct 2017 | JP |
| 6433440 | Dec 2018 | JP |
| 6516720 | May 2019 | JP |
| 6529495 | Jun 2019 | JP |
| 2019163298 | Sep 2019 | JP |
| 6683886 | Apr 2020 | JP |
| 2020100670 | Jul 2020 | JP |
| 6781150 | Nov 2020 | JP |
| 6824315 | Feb 2021 | JP |
| 6830671 | Feb 2021 | JP |
| 2021506752 | Feb 2021 | JP |
| 2021506984 | Feb 2021 | JP |
| 100602725 | Jul 2006 | KR |
| 20070104471 | Oct 2007 | KR |
| 20090031598 | Mar 2009 | KR |
| 20090043603 | May 2009 | KR |
| 101495146 | Feb 2015 | KR |
| 20150129695 | Nov 2015 | KR |
| 20160030955 | Mar 2016 | KR |
| 20160032127 | Mar 2016 | KR |
| 20180058738 | Jun 2018 | KR |
| 20190065311 | Jun 2019 | KR |
| 20190072561 | Jun 2019 | KR |
| 20190104510 | Sep 2019 | KR |
| 20190134711 | Dec 2019 | KR |
| 20200016889 | Feb 2020 | KR |
| 20200030065 | Mar 2020 | KR |
| 20200045489 | May 2020 | KR |
| 20200116102 | Oct 2020 | KR |
| 20200119234 | Oct 2020 | KR |
| 20200121780 | Oct 2020 | KR |
| 2180343 | Nov 2020 | KR |
| 2192554 | Dec 2020 | KR |
| 20210008478 | Jan 2021 | KR |
| 2239042 | Apr 2021 | KR |
| 20210094513 | Jul 2021 | KR |
| 29319 | Mar 2008 | MA |
| PA01005884 | Apr 2002 | MX |
| 233001 | Dec 2005 | MX |
| 2007009923 | Mar 2008 | MX |
| 2008015083 | Dec 2008 | MX |
| 2009002310 | Sep 2009 | MX |
| 2015011242 | May 2016 | MX |
| 340591 | Jul 2016 | MX |
| 366681 | Jul 2019 | MX |
| 2019002606 | Sep 2019 | MX |
| 372447 | Mar 2020 | MX |
| 377251 | Nov 2020 | MX |
| 381381 | Apr 2021 | MX |
| 118612 | Dec 2004 | MY |
| 20073854 | Nov 2007 | NO |
| 326479 | Dec 2008 | NO |
| 20085158 | Jan 2009 | NO |
| 20091211 | May 2009 | NO |
| 512287 | Dec 2002 | NZ |
| 556562 | Aug 2010 | NZ |
| 572481 | Mar 2011 | NZ |
| 575744 | Oct 2011 | NZ |
| 595388 | Dec 2011 | NZ |
| 14824 | Jan 2011 | OA |
| 12019500493 | May 2019 | PH |
| 12019500494 | Jun 2019 | PH |
| 12019500751 | Aug 2019 | PH |
| 12019502723 | Jul 2020 | PH |
| 192864 | Dec 2006 | PL |
| 1278721 | Jul 2007 | PT |
| 2931268 | Feb 2018 | PT |
| 2961399 | Feb 2018 | PT |
| 2768484 | Oct 2019 | PT |
| 3335708 | Mar 2020 | PT |
| 3021838 | Sep 2020 | PT |
| 3335709 | Oct 2020 | PT |
| 57077 | Jun 2018 | RS |
| 2210360 | Aug 2003 | RU |
| 2257917 | Aug 2005 | RU |
| 2435569 | Dec 2011 | RU |
| 2673239 | Nov 2018 | RU |
| 2725886 | Jul 2020 | RU |
| 2019110127 | Oct 2020 | RU |
| 2020101972 | Jul 2021 | RU |
| 136196 | Nov 2007 | SG |
| 11201504637 | Oct 2017 | SG |
| 11201505029 | Nov 2017 | SG |
| 11201901996 | Apr 2019 | SG |
| 11201901998 | Apr 2019 | SG |
| 11201903076 | May 2019 | SG |
| 11201911470 | Dec 2019 | SG |
| 11201912625 | Jan 2020 | SG |
| 11202000817 | Feb 2020 | SG |
| 11202000952 | Feb 2020 | SG |
| 11201507121 | May 2020 | SG |
| 11202004965 | Jun 2020 | SG |
| 11202006575 | Aug 2020 | SG |
| 513416 | Dec 2002 | TW |
| 200812649 | Mar 2008 | TW |
| 200815045 | Apr 2008 | TW |
| 200824693 | Jun 2008 | TW |
| I619492 | Apr 2018 | TW |
| 201831174 | Sep 2018 | TW |
| 201836596 | Oct 2018 | TW |
| 201840544 | Nov 2018 | TW |
| I639425 | Nov 2018 | TW |
| 201909904 | Mar 2019 | TW |
| 201919605 | Jun 2019 | TW |
| 201932448 | Aug 2019 | TW |
| I681770 | Jan 2020 | TW |
| 202014186 | Apr 2020 | TW |
| 202019880 | Jun 2020 | TW |
| I707677 | Oct 2020 | TW |
| I710552 | Nov 2020 | TW |
| I716458 | Jan 2021 | TW |
| 727362 | May 2021 | TW |
| 30442 | Jan 2008 | UY |
| 30561 | Mar 2008 | UY |
| 65599 | Sep 2019 | VN |
| 66223 | Oct 2019 | VN |
| 66257 | Oct 2019 | VN |
| 76195 | Mar 2021 | VN |
| 9428880 | Dec 1994 | WO |
| 9640105 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9909972 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 0033862 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0038672 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 0119361 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0224715 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 0245684 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2004093884 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2005016318 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| 2005030174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005055983 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| 2005099671 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2006029155 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006053186 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006080029 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2006088814 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2007053698 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007103200 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007109104 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008033351 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008027395 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008042218 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008005240 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008086804 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008027357 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009056550 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009092818 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009104080 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2010042759 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010053691 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010055260 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010124046 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011119839 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011127252 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011135461 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2011139271 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2011140310 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012028688 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012085656 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012107652 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012112140 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012112492 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012114342 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2013119231 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2014028610 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014078014 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014093791 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014134380 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014159340 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2015006685 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| 2015010014 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| 2015076821 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2015120006 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| 2015120110 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| 2015166473 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2016087952 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| 2016178132 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| 2017049470 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017050259 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017147375 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2017182851 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| 2018015563 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| 2018048862 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018048871 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018067971 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| 2018167303 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| 2018176343 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| 2018222954 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| 2018234492 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| 2019027941 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| 2019033330 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| 2019041361 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| 2019109018 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019123269 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019126214 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019126215 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019126218 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019137381 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| 2019028340 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2019126216 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| 2019200251 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| 2019232724 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| 2019233447 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| 2020019247 | Jan 2020 | WO |
| 2020020189 | Jan 2020 | WO |
| 2020062251 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| 2020106735 | May 2020 | WO |
| 2020118165 | Jun 2020 | WO |
| 2020143198 | Jul 2020 | WO |
| 2020178695 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| 2021078988 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| 2021127461 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| 2021133778 | Jul 2021 | WO |
| 2021168403 | Aug 2021 | WO |
| 200104585 | Jun 2002 | ZA |
| 202000676 | Jan 2021 | ZA |
| Entry |
|---|
| Barateau et al., Treatment Options for Narcolepsy, CNS Drugs, May 2016, 30(5):369-379. (Year: 2016). |
| Anonymous., “How Much Protein Is in Your Cup of Milk?”, Retrieved from Internet URL: https://milklife.com/articles/nutrition/how-much-protein-your-cup-milk, Retrieved on Aug. 30, 2022, 2 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,381 dated Aug. 10, 2022, 15 Pages. |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., “Xyrem® (Sodium Oxybate) Oral Solution, CIII,” Highlights of Prescribing Information, Revised, Sep. 2020, 35 pages. |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., “Xywavo (Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and Sodium Oxybates) Oral Solution, CIII,” Highlights of Prescribing Information, Aug. 2021, 40 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Application No. 3,126,493 dated Aug. 23, 2022, 6 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,201 dated Aug. 26, 2022, 18 pages. |
| Thorpy M.J., “Update on Therapy for Narcolepsy,” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, vol. 17, No. 20, May 2015, pp. 20-32. |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., “Guidance for Industry, Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies,” Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Dec. 2002, BP, 12 pages. |
| Maruyama T., et al., “The Pathogenesis of Narcolepsy, Current Treatments and Prospective Therapeutic Targets,” Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs, 2016, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 63-82. |
| Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2020-529210, dated Oct. 27, 2022, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/530,096, dated Nov. 22, 2022, 20 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,562, dated Apr. 14, 2023, 9 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2017300845 dated May 17, 2022, 6 Pages. |
| Kothare S.V., et al., “Pharmacotherapy of Narcolepsy: Focus on Sodium Oxybate,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 37-52. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,192 dated May 19, 2022, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,205 dated May 13, 2022, 8 pages. |
| Chemical Book, CAS DataBase List, Ethyl cellulose, downloaded in Oct. 2021, 5 Pages, (Year: 2021). |
| Fallingborg J., “Intraluminal pH of the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” Danish Medical Bulletin, Jun. 1999, vol. 46 (3), pp. 183-196. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299, dated Oct. 25, 2021, 28 pages. |
| Jefferies, Flamel Technologies SA publication, https://www.jefferies.com/CMSFiles/Jefferies.com/files/Flamel.pdf, May 1, 2015, 1 Page. |
| Martin John., “Capsule Endoscopy: How Long Does it Take to Pass,” Pill Cam, https://www.topdoctors.eo.uk/medical-articles/capsule-endoscopy-how-long-does-it-take-to-pass, Oct. 5, 2019, 4 Pages. |
| Momenzadeh S., et al., “Evaluation of in Vivo Transfection Efficiency of Eudragit Coated Nanoparticles of Chitosan-DNA: A pH-sensitive System Prepared for Oral DNA Delivery,” Iran Red Crescent Med J, Apr. 2015, vol. 17, No. 4, DOI: 10.5812/ircmj. 16761, 7 Pages. |
| Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/804,966, dated Dec. 10, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Nov. 12, 2021, 36 pages. |
| Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/484,916, dated Nov. 10, 2021, 34 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Dec. 11, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Nov. 13, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated May 1, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated Jun. 26, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, dated Mar. 10, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,633, dated Jun. 9, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,510, dated Jan. 13, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Puguan J.M.C., et al., “Diffusion Characteristics of Different Molecular Weight Solutes in Ca-Alginate Gel Beads,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015, vol. 469, pp. 158-165. |
| Raybon J.J., et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid during Tolerance in Rats: Effects on Extracellular Dopamine,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2007, vol. 320 (3), pp. 1252-1260. |
| Raymond C.R., “Polymethacrylates,” Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Fifth Edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 2006, pp. 553-560. |
| Ritzhaupt A., et al., “The Characterization of Butyrate Transport across Pig and Human Colonic Luminal Membrane,” Journal of Physiology, 1998, vol. 507 (3), pp. 819-830. |
| Roth R.H., et al., “y-Butyrolactone and y-Hydroxybutyric Acid-I, Distribution and Metabolism,” Biochemical Pharmacology, 1966, vol. 15 (9), pp. 1333-1348. |
| Roth R.H., et al., “y-Butyrolactone and y-Hydroxybutyric Acid-II, The Pharmacologically Active Form,” International Journal of Neuropharmacology, 1966, vol. 5 (6), pp. 421-428. |
| Roth T., et al., “Effect of Sodium Oxybate on Disrupted Night Time Sleep in Patients with Narcolepsy,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2017, vol. 26, pp. 407-414. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Jun. 1, 2011, 12 pages. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc.,“Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Mar. 9, 2011, 13 pages. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Nov. 9, 2012, 18 pages. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Dec. 29, 2010, 21 pages. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Jan. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Intitial Invalidity and Noninfringement Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.6,” dated Apr. 14, 2011, 23 pages. |
| Rubbens J., et al., “Gastric and Duodenal Ethanol Concentrations after Intake of Alcoholic Beverages in Postprandial Conditions,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2017, vol. 14 (12), pp. 4202-4208. |
| Russell I.J., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Relieves Pain and Improves Function in Fibromyalgia Syndrome,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, Jan. 2009, vol. 60 (1), pp. 299-309. |
| Russell J., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Reduces Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Disturbance and Improves Functionality in Fibromyalgia: Results from a 14-week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study,” Pain, 2011, vol. 152 (5), pp. 1007-1017. |
| Russell J., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Relieves Pain and Improves Function in Fibromyalgia Syndrome. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2009, vol. 60 (1), pp. 299-309. |
| Scammell T.E., “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373 (27), Dec. 31, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Scharf M.B., et al., “Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Pain, Fatigue, and the Alpha Sleep Anomaly in Patients with Fibromyalgia. Preliminary Report,” 1998, Journal of Rheumatology, 1998, vol. 25 (10), pp. 1986-1990. |
| Scharf M.B., et al., “GHB-New Hope for Narcoleptics?,” Biol Psychiatry, 1989, vol. 26 (4), pp. 329-330. |
| Scharf M.B., et al., “Pharmacokinetics of Gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Narcoleptic Patients,” Sleep, 1998, vol. 21 (5), pp. 507-514. |
| Scharf M.B., et al., “The Effects of Sodium Oxybate on Clinical Symptoms and Sleep Patterns in Patients with Fibromyalgia,” Journal of Rheumatology, May 2003, vol. 30 (5) pp. 1070-1074. |
| Scharf M.B., “The Effects and Effectiveness of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Patients with Narcolepsy,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Jun. 1985, vol. 46 (6), pp. 222-225. |
| Schie M.K.M.V., et al., “Improved Vigilance after Sodium Oxybate Treatment in Narcolepsy: A Comparison between In-Field and In-Laboratory Measurements,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2016, vol. 25, pp. 486-496. |
| Scrima L., et al., “Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on a Patient with Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 137. |
| Scrima L., et al., “Effect of High Altitude on a Patient with Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 427. |
| Scrima L., et al., “Efficacy of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Versus Placebo in Treating Narcolepsy-Cataplexy: Double-Blind Subjective Measures,” Biological Psychiatry, 1989, vol. 26 (4), pp. 331-343. |
| Scrima L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Effects on Cataplexy and Sleep Attacks in Narcoleptics,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 134. |
| Scrima L., et al., “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Jan. 24, 1991, vol. 324 (4), pp. 270-272. |
| Scrima L., et al., “The Effects of y-Hydroxybutyrate on the Sleep of Narcolepsy Patients: A Double-Blind Study,” Sleep, 1990, vol. 13 (6), pp. 479-490. |
| Second Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3028878, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 4 Pages. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201780057633, dated Jun. 30, 2021, 12 Pages. |
| Seno M., et al., “The Rheological Behaviour of Suspensions of Ion-exchange Resin Particles,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Apr. 1966, vol. 39 (4), pp. 776-778. |
| Series F., et al., “Effects of Enhancing Slow-Wave Sleep by Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, Jun. 1992, vol. 145 (6), pp. 1378-1383. |
| Shah V.P., et al., “In Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison—Statistics and Analysis of the Similarity Factor, f2,” Pharmaceutical Research, 1998, vol. 15 (6), pp. 889-896. |
| Singh I., et al., “Ion Exchange Resins: Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Applications,” Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2007, vol. 32, pp. 91-100. |
| Snead O.C., et al., “Ontogeny of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid. I. Regional Concentration in Developing Rat, Monkey and Human Brain,” Brain Research, 1981, vol. 227 (4), pp. 579-589. |
| Snead O.C., “y-Hydroxybutyrate Model of Generalized Absence Seizures: Further Characterization and Comparison with Other Absence Models,” Epilepsia, 1988, vol. 29 (4), pp. 361-368. |
| Srikanth M.V., et al., “Ion-Exchange Resins as Controlled Drug Delivery Carriers,” Journal of Scientific Research, 2010, vol. 2 (3), pp. 597-611. |
| Stock G., “Increase in Brain Dopamine After Axotomy or Treatment With Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid Due to Elimination of the Nerve Impulse Flow,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol, 1973, vol. 278 (4), pp. 347-361. |
| Strand M.C., et al., “Driving Under the Influence of Non-Alcohol Drugs—An Update. Part II: Experimental Studies,” Forensic Science Review, 2016, vol. 28 (2), pp. 100-101. |
| Strong A.J., “y-Hydroxybutyric Acid and Intracranial Pressure,” The Lancet, Jun. 9, 1984, vol. 1 (8389), p. 1304. |
| Suner S., et al., “Pediatric Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Intoxication,” Academic Emergency Medicine, 1997, vol. 4 (11), pp. 1041-1045. |
| Susta M., et al., “Emotion Stimulus Processing in Narcolepsy with Cataplexy,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2017, vol. 26, pp. 30-37. |
| Takahara J., et al., “Stimulatory Effects of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid on Growth Hormone and Prolactin Release In Humans,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1977, vol. 44 (5), pp. 1014-1017. |
| Takka S., et al., “Evaluation of Chitosan/Alginate Beads Using Experimental Design: Formulation and in Vitro Characterization,” AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, Mar. 2010, vol. 11 (1), pp. 460-466. |
| “Taxotere,” Physicians Desk Reference, 51st Edition, 1997, pp. 2204-2207. |
| Thai D., et al., “GHB and Ethanol Effects and Interactions in Humans,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2006, vol. 26 (5), pp. 524-529. |
| Thorpy M., et al., “Reducing the Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of Narcolepsy by Earlier Diagnosis and Effective Treatment,” Sleep Medicine Clinics, 2017, vol. 12 (1), pp. 61-71. |
| Thorpy M.J., “Recently Approved and Upcoming Treatments for Narcolepsy,” CNS Drugs, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 9-27. |
| FDA: “Impurities in New Drug Products,” Guidance for Industry Q3B(R2), Aug. 2006, Revision 3, 18 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: https://www.fda.gov/media/71733/download. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 51 pages. |
| A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Demonstrates Sodium Oxybate is Effective for the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy, Xyrem International Study Group, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2005, vol. 1 (4), pp. 391-397. |
| Abad V.C., et al., “New Developments in the Management of Narcolepsy,” Nature and Science of Sleep, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 39-57. |
| Abanades S., et al., “Relative Abuse Liability of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Flunitrazepam, and Ethanol in Club Drug Users,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2007, vol. 27 (6), pp. 625-638. |
| Abanades S., et al., “y-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Humans, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics,” Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 2006, vol. 1074, pp. 559-576. |
| “Activase,” Physicians Desk Reference, 50th Edition, 1996, pp. 312, 1058-1061. |
| Ahmed S.M., et al., “Narcolepsy and Influenza Vaccination-Induced Autoimmunity,” Annals of Translational Medicine, 2017, vol. 5 (1), pp. 1-4. |
| Ahmed S.M., et al., “The Safety of Adjuvanted Vaccines Revisited: Vaccine-Induced Narcolepsy,” The Israel Medical Association Journal, 2016, vol. 18, pp. 216-220. |
| Akala E.O., “Effect of Packaging on Stability of Drugs and Drug Products,” Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Regulations and Quality, 2008, pp. 641-686. |
| Akifuddin S.K., et al., “Preparation, Characterization and In-Vitro Evaluation of Microcapsules for Controlled Release of Diltiazem Hydrochloride by Ionotropic Gelation Technique,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, Apr. 2013, vol. 3 (4), pp. 35-42. |
| Aldrete J.A., et al., “Does Magnesium Produce Anesthesia Evaluation of Its Effects on the Cardiovascular and Neurologic Systems,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1968, vol. 47 (4), pp. 428-433. |
| Alshaikh M.K., et al., “Sodium Oxybate for Narcolepsy with Cataplexy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2012, vol. 8 (4), pp. 451-458. |
| “Amberlite IRN78 Resin, Nuclear Grade Strong Base Anion Resin,” The Dow Chemical Company, Product Data Sheet, Form No. 177-02230-0311, Rev. 0, 3 pages. |
| Anand V., et al., “Ion-Exchange Resins: Carrying Drug Delivery Forward,” Drug Discovery Today 2001, Sep. 17, 2001, vol. 6 (17), pp. 905-914. |
| Anonymous, “The Engineering Toolbox,” Retrieved from internet URL: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/relative- humidity-production-processd_511.html, 2003, 3 pages. |
| Arena C., et al., “Absorption of Sodium y-Hydroxybutyrate and Its Prodrug y-Butyrolactone: Relationship between In Vitro Transport and In Vivo Absorption,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1980, vol. 69 (3), pp. 356-358. |
| Baldrick P., “Pharmaceutical Excipient Development: The Need for Preclinical Guidance,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Oct. 2000, vol. 32 (2), pp. 210-218. |
| Barateau L., et al., “Hypersomnolence, Hypersomnia, and Mood Disorders,” Current Psychiatry Reports, 2017, vol. 19, pp. 1-11. |
| Barateau L., et al., “Management of Narcolepsy,” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2016, vol. 18, pp. 1-13. |
| Bayram A.K., et al., “Efficiency of a Combination of Pharmacological Treatment and Nondrug Interventions in Childhood Narcolepsy,” Neuropediatrics, 2016, vol. 47 (6), pp. 380-387. |
| Bedard M.A., et al., “Nocturnal y-Hydroxybutyrate—Effect on Periodic Leg Movements and Sleep Organization of Narcoleptic Patients,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, Feb. 1989, vol. 12 (1), pp. 29-36. |
| Berthier M., et al., “Possible Involvement of a Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Receptor in Startle Disease,” Acta Paediatr, 1994, vol. 83, pp. 678-680. |
| Bhattacharya I., et al., “Feasibility of D-Glucuronate to Enhance y-Hydroxybutyric Acid Metabolism During y-Hydroxybutyric Acid Toxicity: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies,” Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, 2007, vol. 28, pp. 1-11. |
| Bhattacharya I., et al., “Potential y-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) Drug Interactions Through Blood-Brain Barrier Transport Inhibition: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation-Based Evaluation,” Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2006, vol. 33 (5), pp. 657-681. |
| Biospace: “Flamel Technologies Announces Positive Results of A Second Clinical Trial with Micropump® Sodium Oxybate,” BioSpace, Published on: Dec. 22, 2014, 6 Pages. |
| Black J., et al., “Medical Comorbidity in Narcolepsy: Findings from the Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) Study,” Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 33, pp. 13-18. |
| Black J., et al., “The Nightly Use of Sodium Oxybate Is Associated with a Reduction in Noctural Sleep Disruption: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients with Narcolepsy,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2010, vol. 6 (6), pp. 596-602. |
| Black S.W., et al., “Challenges in the Development of Therapeutics for Narcolepsy,” Prog NeurobioL, 2017, vol. 152, pp. 89-113. |
| Bodmeier R., “Tableting of Coated Pellets,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 1997, vol. 413 (1), pp. 1-8. |
| Bogan R., et al., “Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients With Narcolepsy Treated with Sodium Oxybate: Use of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in a Clinical Trial,” Neurology and Therapy, 2016, vol. 5, pp. 203-213. |
| Borgen L., et al., “Xyrem (sodium oxybate): A Study of Dose Proportionality in Healthy Human Subjects,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000, vol. 40, p. 1053. |
| Borgen L.A., et al., “The Influence of Gender and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate Oral Solution in Healthy Subjects,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2003, vol. 43, pp. 59-65. |
| Borgen L.A., et al., “The Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate Oral Solution following Acute and Chronic Administration to Narcoleptic Patients,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004, vol. 44, pp. 253-257. |
| Boscolo-Berto R., et al., “Narcolepsy and Effectiveness of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2012, vol. 16, pp. 431-443. |
| Bowker M.J., et al., “Preparation of Water-Soluble Compounds Through Salt Formulation,” Edited by Wermuth C. G., The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, Academic Press, Third Edition, Chapter 37, 2008, pp. 749-766. |
| Brailsford A.D., et al., “Increases in Serum Growth Hormone Concentrations Associated with GHB Administration,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2017, vol. 41, pp. 54-59. |
| Brenneisen R., et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Excretion of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Healthy Subjects,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, vol. 28, pp. 625-630. |
| Broughton R., et al., “Effects of Nocturnal Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Spell/Waking Patterns in Narcolepsy-Cataplexy,” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Feb. 1980, vol. 7 (1), pp. 23-31. |
| Broughton R., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxy-Butyrate in the Treatment of Narcolepsy: A Preliminary Report,” Narcolepsy, Spectrum Publications, Inc, N.Y., 1976, pp. 659-667. |
| Broughton R., et al., “The Treatment of Narcolepsy-Cataplexy with Nocturnal Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate,” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1979, vol. 6 (1), pp. 1-6. |
| Caballero F., et al., “Characterization of Alginate Beads Loaded With Ibuprofen Lysine Salt and Optimization of the Preparation Method,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2014, vol. 460 (1), pp. 181-188. |
| Calik M.W., “Update on the Treatment of Narcolepsy: Clinical Efficacy of Pitolisant,” Nature and Science of Sleep, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 127-133. |
| Carlier L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB), An Unusual Cause of High Anion Gap Metabolic Acidosis,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine | Journal Canadien De La Medecine D'urgence, 2018, vol. 20, pp. S2-S5. |
| Carter L.P., et al., “Behavioural Analyses of GHB: Receptor Mechanisms,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009, vol. 121 (1), pp. 100-114. |
| Carter L.P., et al., “Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Subjective Effects of Sodium Oxybate and Triazolam in Healthy Volunteers,” Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2009, vol. 206 (1), pp. 141-154. |
| Chang R.K., et al., “Polymethacrylates,” Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 2006, Fifth Edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp. 553-560. |
| Chem Abstract, ES302338, SciFinder, 1964, 1 page. |
| Ciolino L.A., et al., “The Chemical Interconversion of GHB and GBL: Forensic Issues and Implications,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2001, vol. 46 (6), pp. 1315-1323. |
| Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), Title 21 “Food and Drugs,” Part 211 “Current Good Manufacturing Practice for finished Pharmaceuticals,” Stability testing, vol. 4, Revised as of Apr. 1, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Consolo S., et al., “Mediation by the Corticostriatal Input of the In Vivo Increase in Rat Striatal Acetylcholine Content Induced by 2-Chloroadenosine,” Biochemical Pharmacology, 1983, vol. 32 (19), pp. 2993-2996. |
| Black J., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Improves Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy,” Sleep, Jul. 2006, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 939-946. |
| Office Action for Australian Application No. 2017300845, dated Nov. 2, 2022, 3 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,393, dated Oct. 20, 2022, 18 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201880082447.4 dated Nov. 14, 2022, 16 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,381, dated Dec. 12, 2022, 17 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,393, dated Dec. 21, 2022, 14 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,201, dated Dec. 23, 2022, 18 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,366 dated Apr. 27, 2022, 24 pages. |
| Pai M.P., et al., “Drug Dosing Based on Weight and Body Surface Area: Mathematical Assumptions and Limitations in Obese Adults,” Pharmacotherapy, Sep. 2012, vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 856-868. |
| Haller C., et al., “GHB Urine Concentrations After Single-Dose Administrationin Humans,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2006, vol. 30, pp. 360-364. |
| Haque T., et al., “Model Dependent and Independent Approaches to Compare in Vito Release Profiles From Ethylcellulose and Eudragit L100 Based Matrix Tablets,” Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009, vol. 8 (1), pp. 89-98. |
| Hasenbos M.A.W.M., et al., “Anaesthesia for Bullectomy, A Technique With Spontaneous Ventilation and Extradural Blockade,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40 (10), pp. 977-980. |
| Heide A.V.D., et al., “Core Body and Skin Temperature in Type 1 Narcolepsy in Daily Life; Effects of Sodium Oxybate and Prediction of Sleep Attacks,” Sleep, 2016, vol. 39 (11), pp. 1941-1949. |
| Helrich M., et al., “Correlation of Blood Levels of 4-Hydroxybutyrate with State of Consciousness,” Anesthesiology, 1964, vol. 25 (6), pp. 771-775. |
| Hennessy S.A., et al., “The Reactivity of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and Gamma-Butyrolactone (GBL) in Alcoholic Solutions,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2004, vol. 49 (6), pp. 1-10. |
| “Hib-Imune,” Physicians Desk Reference, 41st Edition, 1987, pp. 1095-1096. |
| “HibVAX,” Physicians Desk Reference, 41st Edition, 1987, p. 870. |
| Hoes M.J.A.J.M., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (*) as Hypnotic, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid as Hypnotic in Man,” L'Encephale: Revue de psychiatry clinique biologique et therapeutique, 1980, vol. 6 (1), pp. 93-99. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/068552, dated Jan. 31, 2019, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/B2018/060278, dated Apr. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/068552, dated Sep. 15, 2017, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2020/051726, dated May 18, 2020, 13 pages. |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals., “Jazz Pharmaceuticals Announces Positive Top-line Results from Phase 3 Study of JZP-258 in Adult Narcolepsy Patients with Cataplexy and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness,” Retrieved from URL: https:// Investor jazzpharma.com/node/16206/pdf, Mar. 26, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Jennum P., et al., “Morbidity of Childhood Onset Narcolepsy: A Controlled National Study,” Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 29, pp. 13-17. |
| Johnson M.W., et al., “Comparative Abuse Liability of GHB and Ethanol in Humans,” Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2013, vol. 21 (2), pp. 112-123. |
| Jones A.W., et al., “Concentration-Time Profiles of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate in Blood After Recreational Doses are Best Described by Zero-Order Rather Than First-Order Kinetics,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2009, vol. 33, pp. 332-335. |
| Kallweit U., et al., “Pharmacological Management of Narcolepsy with and without Cataplexy,” Expert Opinionon Pharmacotherapy, 2017, vol. 18 (8) pp. 809-817. |
| Keating G.M., “Sodium Oxybate: A Review of Its Use in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome and in the Maintenance of Abstinence in Alcohol Dependence,” Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, vol. 34, pp. 63-80. |
| Khatami R., et al., “The European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) database,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2016, vol. 25, pp. 356-364. |
| Khediri F., et al., “Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta) in the Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2011, vol. 2011, Article ID 783196, 9 pages. |
| Kollb-Sielecka M., et al., “The European Medicines Agency Review of Pitolisant for Treatment of Narcolepsy: Summary of the Scientific Assessment by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use,” Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 33, pp. 125-129. |
| Kornum B.R., et al., “Narcolepsy,” Nature Reviews/Disease Primers, Feb. 9, 2017, vol. 3, pp. 1-19. |
| Kovalska P., et al., “Higher Body Mass Index in Narcolepsy with Cataplexy: Lifelong Experience”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 32, 1 page. |
| Kovalska P., et al., “Narcolepsy with Cataplexy in Patients Aged Over 60 years: A Case-Control Study,” Sleep Medicine, 2016, vol. 26, pp. 79-84. |
| Krahn L.E., “Understanding the Needs of Older Patients with Narcolepsy,” Sleep Medicine, 2016, vol. 26, 3 pages. |
| Kristoffersen L., et al., “Determination of Safety Margins for Whole Blood Concentrations of Alcohol and Nineteen Drugs in Driving Under the Influence Cases,” Forensic Science International, 2016, vol. 259, pp. 119-126. |
| Laborit H., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate, Succinic Semialdehyde and Sleep,” Laboratoire d'Eutonologie, 1973, pp. 257-274. |
| Ladinsky H., et al., “Mode of Action of Gamma-Butyrolactone on the Central Cholinergic System,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's, Arch Pharmacol, 1983, vol. 322 (1), pp. 42-48. |
| Lam W.K., et al., “Monocarboxylate Transporter-Mediated Transport of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Human Intestinal Caco-2 Cells,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2010, vol. 38 (3), pp. 441-447. |
| Lammers G.J., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate and Narcolepsy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study,” Sleep, 1993, vol. 16 (3), pp. 216-220. |
| Lapierre, et al., “The Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate: A Double-Blind Study of Normal Subjects,” Sleep Research, 1988, vol. 17 (99), 6 pages. |
| Lapierre O., et al., “The Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Nocturnal and Diurnal Sleep of Normal Subjects: Further Considerations on REM Sleep-Triggering Mechanisms,” Sleep, 1990, vol. 13 (1), pp. 24-30. |
| Leendreux M., et al., “Narcolepsy Type 1 Is Associated with a Systemic Increase and Activation of Regulatory T Cells and with a Systemic Activation of Global T Cells,” PLoS One, Jan. 20, 2017, pp. 1-14. |
| Lee C.R., “Evidence for the Beta-Oxidation of Orally Administered 4-Hydroxybutyrate in Humans,” Biochemical Medicine, 1977, vol. 17 (3), pp. 284-291. |
| Lernmark A., “Environmental Factors in the Etiology of Type 1 Diabetes, Eliac Disease and Narcolepsy,” Pediatric Diabetes, Jul. 2016, vol. 17 (22), pp. 65-72. |
| Lettieri J., et al., “Improved Pharmacological Activity via Pro-Drug Modification: Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Gamma-hydroxybutyrate and Gamma-butyrolactone,” Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology, Oct. 1, 1978, vol. 22 (1), pp. 107-118. |
| Liakoni E., et al., “Presentations to an Urban Emergency Department in Switzerland Due to Acute Y-hydroxybutyrate Toxicity,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2016, vol. 24 (107), pp. 1-9. |
| Liechti M.E., et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Healthy Subjects,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016, vol. 81, pp. 980-988. |
| Lin R.Y., et al., “Human Monocarboxylate Transporter 2 (MCT2) Is a High Affinity Pyruvate Transporter,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Oct. 30, 1998, vol. 273 (44), p. 28959-28965. |
| Lingford-Hughes A., et al., “Improving GHB Withdrawal with Baclofen: Study Protocol for a Feasibility Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial,” Trials, 2016, vol. 17, pp. 1-11. |
| Linselle M., et al., “Can Drugs Induce or Aggravate Sleep Apneas? A Case Non Case Study in Vigibase the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database,” Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, vol. 31 (3), pp. 359-366. |
| Lubrano E., et al., “Fibromyalgia in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. An Association with the Severity of the Intestinal Disorder,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2001, vol. 16 (4), pp. 211-215. |
| Luhn O., “Using Excipients In Powder Formulations,” Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, Retrieved from URL: https://www.pharmtech.com/view/using-excipients-powder-formulations, Jan. 7, 2011, vol. 23 (1), 2 pages. |
| Lusina M., et al., “Stability Study of Losartan/hydrochlorothiazide Tablets,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2005, vol. 291 (1-2), pp. 127-137. |
| Mahore J.G., et al., “Ion Exchange Resins: Pharmaceutical Applications and Recent Advancement,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, Mar.-Apr. 2010, vol. 1 (2), pp. 8-13. |
| Maitre M., et al., “Mechanisms for the Specific Properties of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Brain,” Medicinal Research Reviews, 2016, vol. 36, pp. 1-25. |
| Mamelak M., et al., “A Pilot Study on the Effects of Sodium Oxybate on Sleep Architecture and Daytime Alertness in Narcolepsy,” Sleep, 2004, vol. 27 (7), pp. 1327-1334. |
| Mamelak M., et al., “Sleep-Inducing Effects of Gammahydroxybutyrate,” The Lancet, Aug. 11, 1973, vol. 302 (7824), pp. 328-329. |
| Mamelak M., et al., “The Effects of y-Hydroxybutyrate on Sleep,” Biological Psychiatry, 1977, vol. 12 (2), pp. 273-288. |
| Office Action for Canadian Application No. 3,084,120 dated Jan. 25, 2023, 4 pages. |
| Chen., et al., “Pharmacokinetics, Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of JZP-258 and Sodium Oxybate: Results of two Phase 1, Open-Label, randomised crossover studies in healthy volunteers,” Sleep Medicine, Abstracts, 2019, vol. 64, pp. S65-S66. |
| Erowid, “Gamma-hydroxybutyrnte (GHB) Basic Synthesis Procedure,” Retrieved from the internet URL: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ghb/ghb_synthesis.shtml (as downloaded on Aug. 8, 2013) 2 pages. |
| Fides, “Solutions of 4-hydrox-ybutyric acid salts for injection,” Chem Abstract ES302338. Laboratorio M. Cuatecases, S.A., 2011. 1 page. |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., “Xyrem® (sodium oxybate) oral solution Prescribing Information,” Xyrem® US Package Insert available at http://pp.jazzpliamia.com/pi/xyem.en.USPI.pdf (downloaded Sep. 12, 2017, 32 pages. |
| Jha M.K., “Modified Release Formulations to Achieve the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP),” IJPSR, 2012, vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 2376-2386. |
| Leu-Semenescu., et al., “Benefits and risk of sodium oxybate in idiopathic hypersomnia versus narcolepsy type 1: a chart review,” Sleep Medicine, Jan. 2016, vol. 17, pp. 38-44. |
| Morrison, Robert T., et al., “Organic Chemistry”, Chapter 20: “Functional Derivatives of Carboxylic Acids,” 3rd Edition, 1973, pp. 658-700. |
| Office Action for Argentina Patent Application No. 20170102053, dated Nov. 9, 2021, 5 Pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020055505, dated Oct. 28, 2021, 11 Pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3084120, dated Aug. 26, 2021, 5 Pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880082447.4, dated Oct. 12, 2021, 20 Pages. |
| Rujivipat., et al., “Improved Drug Delivery to the Lower Intestinal Tract with Tablets Compression-Coated with Enteric/Nonenteric Polymer Powder Blends,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2010, vol. 76, pp. 486-492. |
| Scammell T.E., “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Dec. 31, 2015, vol. 373, No. 27, pp. 2654-2662. |
| Vogel., et al., “Toxicologic/transport properties of NCS-382, a y-hydroxybutyratc (GHB) receptor ligand, in neuronal and epithelial cells: Therapeutic implications for SSADH deficiency, a GABA metabolic disorder,” Toxicol in Vitro, 2018, vol. 46, pp. 203-212. |
| Cook S.I., et al., “Review Article: Short Chain Fatty Acids in Health and Disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1998, vol. 12, pp. 499-507. |
| Cremaschi R.C., et al., “Narcolepsy Type 1 and Type 2—A 10-Year Follow-up: Body Mass Index and Comorbidities,” Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 32, pp. 285-286. |
| Dauvilliers Y., et al., “Narcolepsy with Cataplexy,” The Lancet, 2007, vol. 369, pp. 499-511. |
| Dauvilliers Y., et al., “Vitamin D Deficiency in Type 1 Narcolepsy: A Reappraisal,” Sleep Medicine, 2017, vol. 29, pp. 1-6. |
| Davis G.R., et al., “Active Chloride Secretion in the Normal Human Jejunum,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, Dec. 1980, vol. 66 (6), pp. 1326-1333. |
| Donjacour C.E.H.M., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Increases Prolactin Secretion in Narcolepsy Patients and Healthy Controls,” European Journal of Endocrinology, 2011, vol. 164, pp. 363-370. |
| Drakatos P., et al., “Sleep-Stage Sequencing of Sleep-Onset REM Periods in MSLT Predicts Treatment Response In Patients with Narcolepsy,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2016, vol. 25, pp. 203-210. |
| Dye T.J., et al., “Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Childhood Narcolepsy,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 2018, vol. 25, pp. 14-18. |
| FDA Guideline, Revised Guidance for Industry on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations; Availability, Federal Register, Mar. 19, 2003, vol. 68 (53), 1 page. |
| Felmlee M.A., et al., “Concentration-Effect Relationships for the Drug of Abuse y-Hydroxybutyric Acid,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2010, vol. 333 (3), pp. 764-771. |
| Felmlee M.A., et al., “Mechanistic Toxicokinetic Model for y-Hydroxybutyric Acid: Inhibition of Active Renal Reabsorption as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy,” The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2010, vol. 12 (3), pp. 407-416. |
| Ferrara S.D., et al., “Pharmacokinetics of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Alcohol Dependent Patients After Single and Repeated Oral Doses,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1992, vol. 34, pp. 231-235. |
| Ferrara S.D., et al., “Therapeutic Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Monitoring in Plasma and Urine by Gas Chromatographymass Spectrometry,” Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, 1993, vol. 11 (6), pp. 483-487. |
| Ferris T.J., et al., “Synthesis, Characterisation and Detection of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Salts,” Forensic Science International, 2012, vol. 216, pp. 158-162. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,940, dated Sep. 10, 2020, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated Apr. 15, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, dated Aug. 19, 2020, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, dated Nov. 24, 2020, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, dated Nov. 24, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,219, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,515, dated Apr. 21, 2021, 78 pages. |
| First Office Action for Brazilian Patent Application No. 112019000848.9, dated Jun. 29, 2021, 5 Pages. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201780057633, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 14 Pages. |
| First Office Action for European Patent Application No. 18842651.4, dated May 18, 2021, 5 Pages. |
| Flamel: “Flamel's Drug Delivery Platforms,” publication date: Jun. 2015, pp. 1-43. |
| Flores N.M., et al., “The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Narcolepsy,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2016, vol. 12 (3), pp. 401-407. |
| Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), “Guidance for Industry Container Closure Systems for Packaging Human Drugs and Biologics, Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Documentation,” May 1999, 56 pages. |
| “Food and Drug Administration, HHS,” 21 C.F.R., Part 184, 1998, pp. 441-535. |
| Franco P., et al., “High Bicarbonate Levels in Narcoleptic Children,” Journal of Sleep Research, 2016, vol. 25, pp. 194-202. |
| Frucht S.J., et al., “A Pilot Tolerability and Efficacy Trial of Sodium Oxybate in Ethanol-Responsive Movement Disorders,” Movement Disorders, 2005, vol. 20 (10), pp. 1330-1337. |
| Frucht S.J., et al., “A Single-Blind, Open-Label Trial of Sodium Oxybate for Myoclonus and Essential Tremor,” Neurology, 2005, vol. 65 (12), pp. 1967-1970. |
| Fuller D.E., et al., “The Xyrem Risk Management Program,” Drug Safety, 2004, vol. 27 (5), pp. 293-306. |
| Fung H., et al., “Pharmacokinetics of 1,4-Butanediol in Rats: Bioactivation to y-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Interaction with Ethanol, and Oral Bioavailability,” The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2008, vol. 10 (1), pp. 56-69. |
| Gadroen K., et al., “Patterns of Spontaneous Reports on Narcolepsy following Administration of Pandemic Influenza Vaccine; A Case Series of Individual Case Safety Reports in Eudravigilance,” Vaccine, 2016, vol. 34, pp. 4892-4897. |
| Gallimberti L., et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Treatment of Opiate Withdrawal,” Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 1994, vol. 244 (3), pp. 113-114. |
| Gallimberti L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid for Treatment of Opiate Withdrawal Syndrome,” Neuropsychopharmacology, 1993, vol. 9 (1), pp. 77-81. |
| Gallimberti L., “Gamma-hydroxybutyric Acid for Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome,” The Lancet, Sep. 30, 1989, vol. 2 (8666), pp. 787-789. |
| Gallimberti L., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Double Blind Study,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Jul./Aug. 1992, vol. 16 (4), pp. 673-676. |
| Gennaro A.R., “Oral Solid Dosage Forms,” 20th Edition, Chapter 45, The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 2000, pp. 858-893. |
| Gennaro A.R., “Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy,” 20th Edition, 2000, pp. 860-863. |
| George C.F.P., et al., “A 2-week, Polysomnographic, Safety Study of Sodium Oxybate in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome,” Sleep Breath, 2011, vol. 15, pp. 13-20. |
| Gerra G., et al., “Flumazenil Effects on Growth Hormone Response to Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid,” International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994, vol. 9, pp. 211-215. |
| Gessa G.L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) for Treatment of Ethanol Dependence,” European Neuropsychopharmacology, 1993, vol. 3 (3), pp. 224-225. |
| Gessa G.L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, 1992, vol. 15, Suppl. 1, Pt. A, pp. 303A-304A. |
| Gill R.K., et al., “Expression and Membrane Localization of MCT Isoforms along the Length of the Human Intestine,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 2005, vol. 289, pp. C846-C852. |
| Grenier V., et al., “Enzymatic Assay for GHB Determination in Forensic Matrices,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2012, vol. 36, pp. 523-528. |
| Grove-White I.G., et al., “Critical Flicker Frequency after Small Doses of Methohexitone, Diazepam and Sodium 4-Hydroxybutyrate,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Feb. 1971, vol. 43 (2), pp. 110-112. |
| Grove-White I.G., et al., “Effect of Methohexitone, Diazepam and Sodium 4-Hydroxybutyrate on Short-Term Memory,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Feb. 1971, vol. 43 (2), pp. 113-116. |
| Tittarelli R., et al., “Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Determination of GHB, GHB-Glucuronide in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Narcoleptic Patients under Sodium Oxybate Treatment,” Forensic Science International, 2017, vol. 274, pp. 70-74. |
| “Transcript of a Markman Hearing,” In the Case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 106108 ES), Apr. 26, 2012, 231 pages. |
| Tunnicliff G., “Sites of Action of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)—A Neuroactive Drug with Abuse Potential,” Clinical Toxicology, 1997, vol. 35 (6), pp. 581-590. |
| Turnberg L.A., “Abnormalities in Intestinal Electrolyte Transport in Congenital Chloridorrhoea,” Gut, 1971, vol. 12 (7), pp. 544-551. |
| United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc .: The National Formulary, 23/NF18, Jan. 1, 1995, p. 2205. |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., et al., “Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms,” Food and Drug Administration, CDER, Aug. 1997, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., et al., “Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations,” Food and Drug Administration, CDER, Sep. 1997, 28 pages. |
| Van A.G., et al., “Placentatransfer of 4-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Man,” Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 1978, vol. 110, pp. 55-64. |
| Van Ginneken C.A.M., et al., “Linear and Nonlinear Kinetics of Drug Elimination. I. Kinetics on the Basis of a Single Capacity-Limited Pathway of Elimination with or Without Simultaneous Supply-Limited Elimination,” Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1974, vol. 2 (5), pp. 395-415. |
| Vickers M.D., “Gammahydroxybutyric Acid,” International Anesthesiology Clinics, 1969, vol. 7 (1), pp. 75-89. |
| Wade A., et al., “Malic Acid,” The Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Second Edition, 1994, pp. 285-286, 633. |
| Walden M., et al., “The Effect of Ethanol on the Release of Opioids 30 from Oral Sustained-Release Preparations,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2007, vol. 33 (10), pp. 1101-1111. |
| Wang Q., et al., “Characterization of Monocarboxylate Transport in Human Kidney HK-2 Cells,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2006, vol. 3 (6), pp. 675-685. |
| Wang Q., et al., “Flavonoids Modulate Monocarboxylate Transporter-1-Mediated Transport of y-Hydroxybutyrate In Vitro and In Vivo,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2007, vol. 35 (2), pp. 201-208. |
| Wang Q., et al., “Monocarboxylate Transporter (MOT) Mediates the Transport of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Human Kidney HK-2 cells,” Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, vol. 24 (6), pp. 1067-1078. |
| Wang Q., et al., “Pharmacokinetic Interaction between the Flavonoid Luteolin and y-Hydroxybutyrate in Rats: Potential Involvement of Monocarboxylate Transporters,” The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2008, vol. 10 (1), pp. 47-55. |
| Wang Q., et al., “The Role of Monocarboxylate Transporter 2 and 4 in the Transport of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Mammalian Cells,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2007, vol. 35 (8), pp. 1393-1399. |
| Wang Q., et al., “Transport of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Rat Kidney Membrane Vesicles: Role of Monocarboxylate Transporters,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2006, vol. 318 (2), pp. 751-761. |
| World Health Organization, “Annex 7: Multisource (Generic) Pharmaceutical Products: Guidelines on Registration Requirements to Establish Interchangeability,” WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, Fortieth Report, Retrieved from URL: http://apps.who.int/prequal/infogeneral/documents/TRS937/WHOTRS937_eng.pdf#page=359, 2006, pp. 347-390. |
| World Health Organization (WHO), “Guidelines on Packaging for Pharmaceutical Products,” WHO Technical Report Series, Annexure 9, 2002, pp. 119-156. |
| Xyrem: “Mean Oxybate Plasma Concentration in Healthy Volunteers,” retrieved from URL: https://www.xyremhcp.com/xyrem-pharmacokinetics-adults, downloaded in Jul. 2021, 10 Pages. |
| Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate)., “Highlights of Prescribing Information and Full Prescribing Information,” Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc, Apr. 2015, 31 pages. |
| Yamada Y., et al., “Effect of Butyrolactone and Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on the EEG and Sleep Cycle in Man,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1967, vol. 22 (6), pp. 558-562. |
| Zheng J., “Formulation and Analytical Development for Low-Dose Oral Drug Products,” John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, Table 4.1, 2009, 28 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Application No. 202210041938.2, dated Dec. 1, 2022, 23 pages. |
| Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,366 dated Aug. 1, 2022, 33 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3,084, 120 dated Jul. 25, 2022, 3 pages. |
| Guiraud J., et al., “Treating Alcohol Dependence with an Abuse and Misuse Deterrent Formulation of Sodium. Oxybate: Results of a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study,” European Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 52, Retrieved from Internet URL: www.elsevier.com/locate/euroneuro, accepted on Jun. 7, 2021, pp. 18-30. |
| Goyanes A., et al., “Gastrointestinal Release Behaviour of Modified-Release Drug Products: Dynamic Dissolution Testing of Mesalazine Formulations,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2015, vol. 484, No. 1-2, pp. 103-108, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1462647/3/Basit.1462647_5-ASA.pdf. |
| Office Action for European Patent Application No. 17742441.3, dated Mar. 11, 2022, 7 Pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020055505, dated Feb. 21, 2022, 11 Pages. |
| “Pharma Excipients,” Eudragit® L 100-55, Description, Additional Information, Mar. 2022, 2 pages, Retrieved from the internet URL: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/product/eudragit-I-100-55/. |
| Thorpy M.J., “Update on Therapy for Narcolepsy” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2015, 17(20), pp. 1-12. |
| Mamelak M., et al., “Treatment of Narcolepsy and Sleep Apnea with Gammahydroxybutyrate: A Clinical and Polysomnographic Case Study,” Sleep, 1981, vol. 4 (1), pp. 105-111. |
| Mamelak M., et al., “Treatment of Narcolepsy with y-Hydroxybutyrate. A Review of Clinical and Sleep Laboratory Findings,” Sleep, 1986, vol. 9 (1), pp. 285-289. |
| Mamelak M., “Gamma-hydroxybutyrate: An Endogenous Regulator of Energy Metabolism,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1989, vol. 13 (4), pp. 187-198. |
| Maresova P., et al., “Treatment Cost of Narcolepsy with Cataplexy in Central Europe,” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 1709-1715. |
| Markman Opinion, filed Sep. 14, 2012, In the Case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 10-6108 ES, 43 pages. |
| Martinez-Orozco F.J., et al., “Comorbidity of Narcolepsy Type 1 With Autoimmune Diseases and Other Immunopathological Disorders: A Case-Control Study,” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 2016, vol. 8 (7), pp. 495-505. |
| Mason P.E., et al., “Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Intoxication,” Academic Emergency Medicine, 2002, vol. 9 (7), pp. 730-739. |
| Mazarr-Proo S., et al., “Distribution of GHB in Tissues and Fluids Following a Fatal Overdose,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, vol. 29 (5), pp. 398-400. |
| Medicines for Children, “Oral Rehydration Salts,” Leaflet information by Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG), Retrieved from URL: https://www.medicinesforchildren.org.uk/oral-rehyd ration-salts, published Jul. 25, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Mesmer, et al., “Determination of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and Gamma-Butyrolactone (GBL) by HPLC/UV-VIS Spectrophotometry and HPLC/Thermospray Mass Spectrometry,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1998, vol. 43 (3), pp. 489-492. |
| Moldofsky H., “A Chronobiologic Theory of Fibromyalgia,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, 1993, vol. 1 (1), pp. 49-59. |
| Moldofsky H., et al., “Muskuloskeletal Symptoms and Non-REM Sleep Disturbance in Patients with ‘Fibrositis Syndrome’ and Healthy Subjects,” Psychosomatic Medicine, Jul.-Aug. 1975, vol. 37 (4), pp. 341-351. |
| Moresco M., et al., “Pharmacogenetics and Treatment Response in Narcolepsy Type 1: Relevance of the Polymorphisms of the Drug Transporter Gene ABCB1,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, 2016, vol. 39 (1), pp. 18-23. |
| Morgenthaler T.I., “Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Narcolepsy and other Hypersomnias of Central Origin,” Sleep, 2007, vol. 30 (12), 16 pages. |
| Morris M.E., et al., “Overview of the Proton-coupled MCT (SLC16A) Family of Transporters: Characterization, Function and Role in the Transport of the Drug of Abuse Y-Hydroxybutyric Acid,” The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2008, vol. 10 (2), pp. 311-321. |
| Morris M.E., et al., “Renal Clearance of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Rats: Increasing Renal Elimination as a Detoxification Strategy,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2005, vol. 313 (3), pp. 1194-1202. |
| Morrison R.T., et al., “Organic Chemistry,” 3rd Edition, 1973, pp. 672-677. |
| Morse B.L., et al., “Effects of Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition on the Oral Toxicokinetics/Toxicodynamics of y-Hydroxybutyrate and y-Butyrolactone,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2013, vol. 345, pp. 102-110. |
| Nellore A., et al., “Narcolepsy and Influenza Vaccination—the Inappropriate Awakening of Immunity,” Annals of Translational Medicine, 2016, vol. 4 (29), pp. 1-6. |
| Nema S., et al., “Excipients and Their Use in Injectable Products,” PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Jul.-Aug. 1997, vol. 51 (4), pp. 166-171. |
| Neuman A., “GHB's Path to Legitimacy: An Administrative and Legislative History of Xyrem,” Harvard Law School, Class of 2005, Food and Drug Law, Winter Term 2004, Professor Peter Barton Hutt, Apr. 2004, pp. 1-39. |
| Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,940, dated Apr. 15, 2020, 22 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated May 3, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated Jan. 24, 2020, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,219, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,633, dated Feb. 18, 2021, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Jul. 7, 2021, 22 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Nov. 23, 2020, 18 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,510, dated Dec. 1, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,515, dated Dec. 24, 2020, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299, dated Jul. 21, 2021, 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for Japanese Application No. 2019-503463, dated Feb. 28, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, dated Dec. 10, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, dated Dec. 15, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Notification of Issue for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated Aug. 11, 2020, filed May 29, 2000, 1 Page. |
| Office Action for Canada Application No. 3,028,878, dated Feb. 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-055505, dated Mar. 12, 2020, 9 Pages. |
| Ohta K.M., et al., “Development of a Simple Method for the Preparation of a Silica Gel Based Controlled Delivery System With a High Drug Content,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2005, vol. 26 (1), pp. 87-96. |
| Okun M.S., et al., “GHB: An Important Pharmacologic and Clinical Update,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2001, vol. 4 (2), pp. 167-175. |
| Ondo W.G., et al., “Sodium Oxybate for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Lable Polysomnographic Study,” Arch Neural, Oct. 2008, vol. 65 (10), pp. 1337-1340. |
| Order, filed Sep. 14, 2012, in the case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 10-6108 ES). |
| Outlaw W.M., et al., “Dyspepsia and its Overlap with Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2006, vol. 8 (4), pp. 266-272. |
| Palatini P., et al., “Dose Dependent Absorption and Elimination of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Healthy Volunteers,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1993, vol. 45 (4), pp. 353-356. |
| Palatini P., et al., “Dose-Dependent Absorption and Elimination of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Healthy Volunteers,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1993, vol. 45, pp. 353-356. |
| Pardi D., et al., “y-Hydroxybutyrate/Sodium Oxybate; Neurobiology, and Impact on Sleep and Wakefulness,” Central Nervous System Drugs, 2006, vol. 20 (12), pp. 993-1018. |
| Parmar A., et al., “Clinical Characteristics of Cataplectic Attacks in Type 1 Narcolepsy,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2020, vol. 20 (38), 9 pages. |
| Patil P., et al., “A Review on Ionotropic Gelation Method: Novel Approach for Controlled Gastroretentive Gelispheres,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2012, vol. 4, Suppl. 4, pp. 27-32. |
| “Phospholine Iodide,” Physicians Desk Reference, 50th Edition, 1996, p. 2784. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/484,916 dated Feb. 15, 2022, 47 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299 dated Mar. 15, 2022, 37 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) due for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,366 dated Sep. 20, 2022, 10 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/530,096, dated Mar. 6, 2023, 36 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 18/096,508, dated Apr. 25, 2023, 164 pages. |
| Dornbierer D.A., et al., “Nocturnal Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Reduces Cortisol-Awakening Response and Morning Kynurenine Pathway Metabolites in Healthy Volunteers,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019, vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 631-639. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,381 dated Jun. 23, 2022, 13 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880082447.4, dated May 23, 2022, 13 Pages. |
| Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 1120201112417 dated Sep. 1, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 18842651.4 dated Aug. 2, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,192 dated Sep. 6, 2022, 15 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/896,483, dated Dec. 15, 2022, 23 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,393, dated Nov. 30, 2022, 24 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/231,455, dated Dec. 13, 2022, 29 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,205 dated Jun. 29, 2022, 15 Pages. |
| Office Action for U.S Appl. No. 17/666, 192, dated Apr. 6, 2023, 20 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 18/075,980, dated Apr. 6, 2023, 23 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 202210041938.2, dated Jun. 15, 2023, 12 pages. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 20711328.3, dated Jul. 26, 2023, 5 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,562, dated May 15, 2023, 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 18/096,508, dated Aug. 9, 2023, 9 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,562, dated Jun. 14, 2023, 56 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/731,562, dated Aug. 17, 2023, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 18/075,980, dated Aug. 2, 2023, 9 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 23156035.0, dated Jul. 6, 2023, 12 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2020-529210, dated Apr. 21, 2023, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-055505, dated Jul. 20, 2023, 5 Pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210186916 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62474330 | Mar 2017 | US | |
| 62399413 | Sep 2016 | US | |
| 62365812 | Jul 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16527633 | Jul 2019 | US |
| Child | 17194780 | US | |
| Parent | 16281235 | Feb 2019 | US |
| Child | 16527633 | US | |
| Parent | 15655924 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16281235 | US |
