This invention generally relates to systems to secure tissue, more particularly to tissue securement fibers comprising section(s) of reduced cross sectional area (compared to the cross sectional area of the rest of the fiber) useful in applications wherein the path of the securement fiber is bent at included angles less than 180°, more particularly when the included angle is less than 90°.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is caused by a blockage of the airway, which usually occurs when the soft tissue in the throat collapses and closes during sleep. According to the National Institutes of Health, OSA affects more than twelve million Americans. During each apnea event, the brain briefly arouses the sufferer in order to initiate the resumption of breathing. This type of sleep, however, is extremely fragmented and of poor quality. When left untreated, OSA may result in high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, weight gain, impotency, headaches, memory problems, job impairment, and motor vehicle crashes. Despite the seriousness of OSA, a general lack of awareness among the public and healthcare professionals results in the vast majority of OSA sufferers remaining undiagnosed and untreated.
One non-surgical method available to treat OSA, commonly referred to as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), delivers air into a patient's airway through a specially designed nasal mask or pillow. The flow of air creates positive pressure when the patient inhales to keep the airway open. CPAP is considered by many to be an effective non-surgical treatment for the alleviation of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea, however, patients complain about discomfort caused by the mask and hoses, including bloating, nasal drying, and dry eyes. As a result, patient compliance for CPAP is only about 40%.
Surgical treatments have also been used to treat OSA. One such treatment is referred to as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, which involves removing about 2 cm of the trailing edge of the soft palate to reduce the soft palate's ability to flutter between the tongue and the pharyngeal wall. Another procedure uses a surgical laser to create scar tissue on the surface of the soft palate, which reduces the flexibility of the soft palate for reducing snoring and/or closing of the air passage. Yet another procedure, commonly referred to as cautery-assisted palatal stiffening operation (CAPSO), is an office-based procedure performed under local anesthesia whereby a midline strip of soft palate mucosa is removed, and the wound is allowed to heal whereupon the flaccid palate is stiffened.
Surgical procedures such as those mentioned above continue to have challenges. More specifically, the area of tissue that is surgically treated (i.e., removal of palatal tissue or scarring of palatal tissue) is often larger than is necessary to treat the patient's condition. In addition, the above-mentioned surgical procedures are often painful with extended, uncomfortable healing periods. For example, scar tissue on the soft palate may be a cause of continuing irritation to the patient. Furthermore, the above procedures are not reversible in the event of adverse side effects.
Another implant system, sold under the trademark REPOSE™ by InfluENT of Concord, N.H., uses a titanium screw that is inserted into the posterior aspect of the mandible at the floor of the mouth. The screw acts as an anchor. A loop of suture is passed through the tongue base and attached to the mandibular bone screw. The REPOSE™ procedure achieves a suspension or hammock of the tongue base making it less likely for the base of the tongue to prolapse into the patient's airway during sleep. Due to the high activity of the tongue during wakefulness, however, the suture component of this device may act as a cutting element within the tongue, causing device trans-location and ultimately a loss of efficacy of the procedure thereby requiring subsequent removal.
An additional tongue suspension device developed by ASPIRE Medical is named the ADVANCE System. It is similar to the REPOSE suture suspension system for the tongue base in that it utilizes a bone screw in the mandible as an anchor, but has the advantage of being adjustable. The device further utilizes a flexible shape memory soft tissue anchor within the tongue that is shaped similar to a grappling hook, to engage the tissue within the tongue base. The soft tissue anchor is placed through a small incision in the submental region of the patient's head and the suture is attached to a spool-like component attached to the mandible. Two to four weeks after healing, a small incision is made under the chin and a screw is turned to tighten the suture, thus pulling the base of the tongue forward. While the device provides a simplified installation technique from within the sterile space, the anchors may suffer from device fracture and failure due to loading within the tongue musculature.
A further system is disclosed in US 2008/0208265, Frazier, et al., entitled “System and Method for Percutaneous Palate Remodeling”. This publication discloses a looped tether element with one or more regions of an expanded diameter to reduce the risk of cutting through the tongue. This region is created to provide a flexible implant with a fixed expanded region, a balloon region or an in-situ expanding region. This method provides a large bearing surface on limited regions of the fiber. Additionally, this method requires a supplemental element to create the expanded region on the fiber. It is anticipated that this type of device will also be difficult to extract from tongue tissues after healing has occurred since the portion buried on the tongue base is larger in cross section than the tracks remaining from the trailing ends of the looped tether.
In spite of the above advances in tongue suspension devices, there remains a need for tongue suspension systems, devices and other tissue suspension devices that provide a high degree of flexibility. Such new systems, devices and methods for treating OSA through minimally invasive approaches will improve long term results with improved patient compliance and minimized patient discomfort.
The present invention generally relates to tissue securement fibers comprising:
at least one section having a first cross sectional area;
at least one section having a second cross sectional area; and
wherein the second cross sectional area is less than the first cross sectional area and the at least one section having the second cross sectional area is intermediate to the at least one section having the first cross sectional area.
In other embodiments the fibers comprise biocompatible materials that can be bioabsorbable, non-bioabsorbable or combinations thereof.
In further embodiments the second cross sectional area comprises an arc, crease, or indentation to facilitate bending of the fiber.
The devices and methods of this invention provide securement fibers having discrete locations of reduced cross sectional area and provide at least the following advantages: (i) reduction of the volume of fiber at critical bend locations; (ii) minimization of tendency for “tissue propping” at puncture sites (i.e., tendency of tissue puncture sites to remain in an expanded or open condition due to volume of fiber present at fiber bend site); and (iii) provision of a natural hinge point to reduce necessary bend radius and reduce volume of fiber at the bend point.
This invention is directed to tissue securement fibers having section(s) of reduced cross sectional area, particularly fibers useful as tongue suspension fibers for the treatment of OSA and other procedures involving the suspension of tissue in a living being. Generally, the features disclosed herein describe treatment of fibers that are manufactured with a cross-sectional area that is modified through secondary processing to provide discreet bending zones which provide implants of improved local conformability to the desired fiber path or tissue tract. Thus the fibers may be described as monolithic, in the sense they are of unitary construction without the various sections being joined together.
Referring to
The following sections describe how the tissue securement fiber's cross sectional area may be reduced for biocompatible materials that can be bioabsorbable, non-bioabsorbable or combinations thereof.
As used herein, the reduction of the securement fiber's cross sectional area may be reported as a reduced cross sectional area or may be referenced to as a reduction of diameter or equivalent diameter of the fiber. For example, for fibers of circular or substantially circular diameter, a reduction in the cross sectional diameter D2 will be equal to the square root of the ratio of reduced cross sectional area (A2) to the original cross sectional area (A1) multiplied by the fiber's original diameter (D1) as derived below:
A1=Π/4·D12
A2=Π/4·D22
D22=A2/A1·D12
D2=D1·(A2/A1)1/2
For elliptical cross sections (for the premise that fiber will be bent across the minor diameter of the ellipse) the reduced minor diameter of D2minor will be equal to the ratio of reduced cross sectional area (A2) to the original cross sectional area (A1) multiplied by the fiber's original minor diameter (D1minor) and further multiplied by the ratio of fiber's original major diameter (D1major) to the fiber's reduced major diameter (D2major) as derived below:
A1=H·D1minor/2·D1major/2
A2=H·D2minor/2·D2major/2
D2minor=A2/A1·D1minor·D1major/D2major
For other cross sectional geometries such as squares, rectangles, stars, other polygonal shapes and for irregular cross sections (for which an equivalent cross sectional diameter may be determined by methods known to those of skill in the art), determination of reduced diameters may be determined by following the methodology as provided above for the circular and elliptical cross sectional areas calculations.
A. Securement Fibers of Reduced Diameters Through Drawing of Fiber
The method for reducing fiber diameter by drawing the fibers utilizes fibers that are produced with substantially uniform large cross sectional areas such as full round or other non-round cross-sectional geometries such as elliptical or rectangular, for example. The fibers may be produced as standard solid form extrusions from a variety of polymeric materials. Suitable non-absorbable materials for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, polyamides (e.g., polyhexamethylene adipamide (nylon 66), polyhexamethylene sebacamide (nylon 610), polycapramide (nylon 6), polydodecanamide (nylon 12) and polyhexamethylene isophthalamide (nylon 61) copolymers and blends thereof), polyesters (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate, polybutyl terephthalate, copolymers and blends thereof), fluoropolymers (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride) Poly (hexafluoropropylene-VDF), polyaryletherketones, polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene including isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylene and blends thereof, as well as, blends composed predominately of isotactic or syndiotactic polypropylene blended with heterotactic polypropylene and/or polyethylene (such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,557,264 issued Dec. 10, 1985, assigned to Ethicon, Inc., hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety)) and combinations thereof.
Additionally, bioabsorbable materials may be used to provide temporary suspension fibers. Bioabsorbable fibers are useful such as in the case of trauma, or radical surgical interventions that may cause swelling of the tongue and associated tissues, or in other locations such as urethra suspension, to provide temporary support until edema/swelling has been reduced. Suitable bioabsorbable materials for use as securement fibers include, but are not limited to, aliphatic polyesters which include but are not limited to homopolymers and copolymers of lactide (which includes lactic acid, d-,l- and meso lactide), glycolide (including glycolic acid), ε-caprolactone, p-dioxanone (1,4-dioxan-2-one), trimethylene carbonate (1,3-dioxan-2-one), alkyl derivatives of trimethylene carbonate, δ-valerolactone, β-butyrolactone, γ-butyrolactone, ε-decalactone, hydroxybutyrate, hydroxyvalerate, 1,4-dioxepan-2-one (including its dimer 1,5,8,12-tetraoxacyclotetradecane-7,14-dione), 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, 6,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxan-2-one and polymer blends thereof.
Combinations of absorbable and non-absorbable materials may also be utilized to produce fibers with tailored properties and configurations. One such configuration contemplated is one which provides fibers with absorbable coverings obtained through processing such as by coating and/or co-extrusion.
Of the foregoing materials, the preferred fiber materials include polyesters (e.g. polyethylene terephthalate, polybutyl terephthalate, copolymers and blends thereof), fluoropolymers (e.g. polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride) Poly (hexafluoropropylene-VDF), polyaryletherketones, polyolefins (e.g. polypropylene including isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylene. The most preferred materials are poly (hexafluoropropylene-VDF) and polypropylene.
The conversion of the raw pelletized thermo-plastic polymers into a final fibrous form typically involves thermal melting and extrusion of the raw polymer through an extrusion die to form a particular cross sectional geometry such as square, rectangular, circular, elliptical, star or other polygonal shapes. As the material exits the face of the extrusion die, the polymer enters a quench tank to provide cooling and solidification of the extruded fiber. The fiber is then passed sequentially over a series of heated godets typically rotating with advancing rates of rotation and operating at temperatures above the glass transition temperature of the material and less than the melting temperature of the polymer being processed, for instance in the case of polypropylene, the preferred working temperatures are from 130° C. to 165° C. The differential speeds of rotation, combined with the thermal energy provide for a stretching, or drawing, of the extruded fiber. The fiber may then be subsequently relaxed by passage through a heated chamber and passage over a final godet that is rotating at a speed less than the preceding godet in the system. This stretching of the fiber imparts increasing orientation of the molecular structure of the fiber, increasing the yield strength and rigidity or modulus of elasticity E of the fiber. As the orientation of the fiber is increased, the elongation of the fiber at high stress is also reduced. The relaxation step of the fiber is performed to slightly reduce the orientation of the polymer chains to provide improved flexibility and elongation of the fiber.
The stretching or drawing of the fiber is typically stated as the draw ratio of the fiber which is typically calculated from the linear increase in length of the fiber due to the various speeds of the godets and is stated as a factor of the total elongation vs. the initial length of the undrawn fiber. For example, a polymer is subjected to extrusion and the fiber is passed over three godets A, B and C rotating at progressively increasing speeds VA, VB and VC respectively and a fourth godet, D, rotating at a slightly lower speed VD than the third godet in the system. The draw ratio would be calculated as:
Draw Ratio=(VA/VA)*(VC/VB)*(VD/VC) or (VD/VA)
Alternatively, the use of the distance traveled instead of differential velocity of the godets may also be utilized. In this case, the velocity based equation is converted to the linear distance though the application of the time element. The distance traveled is equal to the velocity of the specific godet multiplied by the time, T that the process has run. Since the time element is fixed for all of the godets in the system, the draw ratio may be expressed more simply as the length of fiber at the completion of drawing (L4) divided by the length of fiber at the initiation to the drawing process (L1).
For example, if godet one is operating at 3 feet per second, and godet four is operating at a speed of 9 feet per second, the resultant draw ratio is equal to (9/3) or 3/1 expressed as 3:1.
An alternative method of assessing the draw ratio would be based upon the ratio of the orifice diameter, for a round fiber, of the extrusion die vs. the final diameter of the final fiber and is defined as the draw down ratio. In this instance the volume of the fiber must remain constant and, for a round fiber, the draw down ratio can be calculated directly from the draw ratio by applying the volume VO equations where:
VO1=VO2
pD12*L1/4=pD42*L4/4
D12*L1=D42*L4
L1/L4=D42/D12
Therefore, to calculate the final diameter fiber the die face orifice diameter, coupled with the draw ratio are applied. For example, in the previous example, if the die face diameter is 0.065″, and the draw ratio is 3:1 and these factors are applied, the final diameter of the fiber is calculated as:
⅓=D42/(0.065)2
(⅓)*(0.065)2D42
0.037″=D4
When materials are extruded to a particular size and shape, the fiber may be produced with a low or minimal draw ratio, approaching a ratio of 1, to provide fibers with greater elongation, reduced notch sensitivity and reduced stiffness when compared to fibers of the same diameter with greater draw ratio's.
The method of localized fiber diameter reduction by drawing the fiber comprises subjecting a portion of the fiber to localized heating at a particular location and then applying tension to the section of fiber extending from the locally heated section of fiber. Referring to
This reduction in diameter or cross-sectional area provides discrete areas that may serve as hinges in the material to enable a reduced bend radius of curvature. The reduced diameter sections may also be subjected to the creation of a preformed shape after the fiber drawing has occurred to provide tighter bend radii after installation in tissue. During installation, the preformed arc will open elastically and upon final installation, the fiber will return to the preformed closed configuration. This feature is particularly useful in applications where the fiber is installed through single puncture sites 28 with fiber 20 folded back over itself ends at included angles of the fiber that are less than 180° such as shown in
The resultant fiber provides both increased elongation and large tissue load bearing surfaces to adapt to excessive loading without cutting through the tissues, while providing a small bend radius, or included bend angle, at the locations of installation to minimize the volume of material located at the puncture site such as those utilized in the installation of tongue suspension fibers as shown in
B. Fibers of Reduced Diameters Through Volume Compaction
A second method for producing securement fibers of reduced cross sectional area or diameters is by compacting of expanded type fiber forms, such as ePTFE. When materials such as ePTFE are utilized, the localized hinge points are created through the use of volume compaction and re-sintering of the material. ePTFE is formed as an expanded Teflon material with free volume located similar to a closed cell foam structure. The material is formed through a paste extrusion and is then subjected to a sintering process to cause bonding of the nodules of material to create a fiber with adequate strength and a high degree of suppleness. When the fiber is produced with larger cross-sectional areas or geometries, it provides a material with good load bearing surfaces to resist tissue cutting during loading without compromising flexibility. As noted earlier, one issue with unmodified fibers relates to the volume of material at the locations of single puncture placements such as those described previously. In these discrete locations, the relatively incompressible closed cell foam like structure can be too bulky and may prop the puncture open during the healing of the tissue (such as depicted in
Referring to
The compaction of the ePTFE fiber is achieved through the application of thermal heating to elevate the temperature of the local region of the fiber to approximately 342° C. to 380° C. The material is compressed within the dies during the heating process until at least a portion of the intermodal distance is reduced and fused into a tighter spacing. This reduction in intermodal spacing serves to reduce the volume of the fiber, however, unlike the drawing process previously described, no elongation of the fiber is necessary to create the reduced diameter region in the fiber.
In either method described above, the fibers exhibit a reduced cross-sectional area at discrete locations to facilitate improved bending and reduced volume to prevent tissue propping of the installation puncture sites. Additionally, the reduced cross sectional area regions of the fiber may be formed with preset curved (arc) or bent geometries that will serve to provide tighter bend radii in the fiber at the preferred discrete bending locations.
In addition to or in combination with either method described above, the fiber may be further compacted in a controlled manner at specific, discrete locations. Such compacting may simply involve forming a crease or indentation across the diameter of the fiber to form a more discrete, hinge-like bending zone. Referring to
The fibers may be produced with one or more reduced cross sectional regions on the fiber. The number of zones of multiple cross sectional reductions on a single fiber will depend on the intended use. For example, in the instance of performing a tissue securement procedure as described in
Additionally, the degree of diameter reduction of the securement fiber may play a role for an intended application. It is contemplated that for tissue securement applications for treating obstructive sleep apnea, the reduction in cross sectional area will range from the original cross sectional area to the reduced cross sectional area from 4:1 to 10:1, preferably from 6:1 to 9:1, most preferably from 3:1
It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure and description of the present invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof and various changes in the size, shape and materials as well as in the description of the preferred embodiment may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2705492 | Chandler | Apr 1955 | A |
3123077 | Alcamo | Mar 1964 | A |
3378010 | Codling et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
4024855 | Bucalo | May 1977 | A |
4069825 | Akiyama | Jan 1978 | A |
4290763 | Hurst | Sep 1981 | A |
4523584 | Lynch | Jun 1985 | A |
4557264 | Hinsch | Dec 1985 | A |
4839215 | Starling et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4881939 | Newman | Nov 1989 | A |
4950285 | Wilk | Aug 1990 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5067485 | Cowen | Nov 1991 | A |
5123913 | Wilk et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5192271 | Kalb et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192274 | Bierman | Mar 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5284161 | Karell | Feb 1994 | A |
5311028 | Glavish | May 1994 | A |
5393984 | Glavish | Feb 1995 | A |
5483077 | Glavish | Jan 1996 | A |
5484444 | Braunschweiler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5609559 | Weitzner | Mar 1997 | A |
5683417 | Cooper | Nov 1997 | A |
5704895 | Scott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792067 | Karell | Aug 1998 | A |
5843077 | Edwards | Dec 1998 | A |
5931855 | Buncke | Aug 1999 | A |
6161541 | Woodson | Dec 2000 | A |
6190401 | Green et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250307 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6348156 | Vishnoi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6408851 | Karell | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6431174 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432437 | Hubbard | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457472 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491714 | Bennett | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513530 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523542 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6578580 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589549 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599310 | Leung et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6627600 | Boutignon | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634362 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6716251 | Asius et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742524 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755868 | Rousseau | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800082 | Rousseau | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6899105 | Krueger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6955172 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017582 | Metzger et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7056331 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7135189 | Knapp | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146981 | Knudson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166570 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213599 | Conrad et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7237554 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261702 | Alexandre et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7288075 | Parihar et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322993 | Metzger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337781 | Vassallo | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360432 | Lehtonen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360542 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367340 | Nelson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7401611 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7442389 | Quelle et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7601164 | Wu | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669603 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7806908 | Ruff | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7850894 | Lindh, Sr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857829 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888119 | Sugaya et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8142422 | Makower et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8307831 | Rousseau | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8413661 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8800567 | Weadock et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010037133 | Knudson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020144685 | Ivanovich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004579 | Rousseau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034312 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030149445 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149447 | Morency et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149488 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020492 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020498 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028676 | Klein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044366 | Bonutti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040102796 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153127 | Gordon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040139975 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144395 | Evans et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147811 | Diederich et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149290 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040231678 | Fierro | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050038472 | Furst | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082452 | Kirby | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092334 | Conrad et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115572 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121039 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126563 | van de Burg et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159637 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2005 | A9 |
20050165352 | Henry et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199248 | Pflueger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203576 | Sulamanidze et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251255 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267321 | Shadduck | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267531 | Ruff et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267532 | Wu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267571 | Spence et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268919 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279365 | Armijo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005843 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2006 | A9 |
20060079935 | Kolster | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083767 | Deusch et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093644 | Quelle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060150986 | Roue et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060185673 | Critzer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206197 | Morsi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207608 | Hirotsuka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207612 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228391 | Seyedin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241339 | Cook et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266369 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289015 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000497 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005109 | Popadiuk et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005110 | Collier et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070102004 | Nelson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102010 | Lemperle et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110788 | Hissong et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119463 | Nelson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123996 | Sugaya et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070144531 | Tomas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144534 | Mery et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144535 | Hegde et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144539 | Dineen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186936 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190108 | Datta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204866 | Conrad et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209665 | Gillis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227545 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233276 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246052 | Hegde et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256693 | Paraschac et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257395 | Lindh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261701 | Sanders | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267027 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270631 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272257 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288057 | Kuhnel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295338 | Loomas et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295340 | Buscemi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023012 | Dineen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035158 | Pflueger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080035160 | Woodson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053461 | Dineen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066764 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066765 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066766 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066767 | Paraschac et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066769 | Dineen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078411 | Buscemi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146868 | Robert et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167614 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199824 | Hargadon | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208265 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221684 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080312688 | Nawrocki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025734 | Doelling et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078411 | Kenison et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090165803 | Bhat et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100023055 | Rousseau | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024830 | Rousseau et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030011 | Weadock et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037901 | Rousseau et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049227 | Hedge et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080791 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106246 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108077 | Lindh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132719 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137794 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137905 | Weadock et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158854 | Puisais | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163056 | Tschopp et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211184 | Rousseau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234794 | Weadock et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234946 | Rousseau | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256443 | Griguol | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100294284 | Hohenhorst et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319710 | Sharkawy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054522 | Lindh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100376 | Rousseau | May 2011 | A1 |
20110100377 | Weadock et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110100378 | Rousseau | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144558 | Rousseau | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174315 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178439 | Irwin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110238111 | Frank | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245850 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282386 | Friedrich | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288583 | Goraltchouk | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120123449 | Schaller et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120160249 | Garrett | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120245629 | Gross et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130074849 | Rousseau et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130098371 | Rousseau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103078 | Crovella et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130118505 | Rousseau et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133669 | Rousseau | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150872 | Rousseau | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130174857 | Rousseau et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186412 | Weadock et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130319427 | Sung et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2465680 | Dec 2001 | CN |
201029957 | Mar 2008 | CN |
102198010 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102271624 | Dec 2011 | CN |
10245076 | Apr 2004 | DE |
2145587 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2386252 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2517633 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2651113 | Mar 1991 | FR |
7-500386 | Jan 1995 | JP |
11-514266 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001-145646 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-506376 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003265621 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005-518899 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-529643 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-507038 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-508708 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-517115 | Jul 2006 | JP |
38-28508 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-512090 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-313337 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-526286 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-529608 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009-006090 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010-017560 | Jan 2010 | JP |
44-14959 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2011-502549 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-530385 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-507356 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2005447 | Jan 1994 | RU |
2202313 | Apr 2003 | RU |
927236 | May 1982 | SU |
1697792 | Dec 1991 | SU |
WO 199713465 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 1999000058 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 2000066050 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2001021107 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2003075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2003096928 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021869 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021870 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004021870 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004060311 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004060311 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084709 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084709 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004103196 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005046554 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005046554 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005051292 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082452 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012188 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2004020492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006072571 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007056583 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075394 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075394 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132449 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132449 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007134005 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146338 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149469 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149469 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008042058 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008063218 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008118913 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009023256 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009036094 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010065341 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2010065341 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2010019376 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010035303 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010051195 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2011058340 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012004758 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012041205 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012064902 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012170468 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MacMillan Dictionary, Fiber , MacMillan Publisher, Limited 2009-2014. |
Cole et al., “Snoring: A Review and a Reassessment”, J. of Otolaryngology, vol. 24, No. 5 pp. 303-306 (1995). |
Harries et al., “The Surgical treatment of snoring”, J. of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 110, Issue 12 pp. 1105-1106 (1996). |
Huang et al., “Biomechanics of snoring”, Endeavour, vol. 19(3): pp. 96-100 (1995). |
Pang, Kenny et al., “Tongue Suspension Suture in Obstructive Sleep Apnea”, Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 252-256 (2006). |
Repose Genioglossus Advancement, Influent Medical, www.influ-ent.com, 1 page (2008). |
Schleef et al., “Cytokine Activation of Vascular Endothelium, Effects on Tissue-Type 1 Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor” The J. of Biological Chem., vol. 263, No. 12, pp. 5797-5803 (1988). |
Schwab et al., “Upper airway and soft tissue changes induced by CPAP in normal subject”, Am. J. Respit. Crit. Care Med., vol. 154, No. 4 pp. 1106-1116 (1996). |
Schwartz et al., “Effects of electrical stimulation to the soft palate on snoring and obstructive sleep apnea”, J. Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 76 pp. 273-281 (1996). |
Shamsuzzaman et al., “Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Implications for Cardiac and Vascular Disease”, JAMA vol. 290, No. 14 pp. 1906-1914 (2003). |
Teles et al., “Use of Palatal Lift Prosthesis on Patient Submitted to Maxillectomy: A Case Report”, Applied Cancer Res. vol. 25(3), pp. 151-154 (2005). |
The Advance System, Aspire Medical, Inc. www.aspiremedical.com, 3 pp (2008). |
The Pillar Procedure, Restore Medical, Inc. www.restoremedical.com, 2 pp (2008). |
Vicente et al., “Tongue-Base Suspension in Conjunction with Uvulopapatopharyngoplasty for Treatment of Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-term Follow-Up Results”, The Laryngoscope, vol. 116 pp. 1223-1227 (2006). |
Wassmuth et al., “Cautery-assisted palatal stiffening operation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 123, pp. 55-60 (2000). |
Wiltfang et al., “First results on daytime submandibular electrostimulation of suprahyoidal muscles to prevent night-time hypopharyngeal collapse in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Intl J. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery vol. 28 pp. 21-25 (1999). |
Database WPI Week 198312, Thomson Scientific, London, GB; AN 1983-D9513K XP002693421, -& SU 927 236 A1 (Petrozazodsk Univ) May 15, 1982 (May 15, 1982) abstract (see figures 7 & 8). |
Friedman et al., “A System and Method for Inserting a Medical Device for Treatment of Sleep Apnea via the Nasal Passage, and Device Therefor”, Dec. 29, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 61/203,758, p. 8 & p. 6/8. |
Medtronic AIRvance System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. http://www.medtronic.com/for-healthcare-professionals/products-therapies/ear-nose-throat/sleep-disordered-breathing-products/airvance-system-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea/index.htm. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,077, filed Mar. 4, 2013 published 2013/0174857. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/578,271, filed Oct. 13, 2009 published 2010/0137905. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/790,509, filed Mar. 8, 2013 published 2013/0186412. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/735,766, filed Jan. 7, 2013 published 2013/0118505. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,377, filed Mar. 16, 2009 published 2010/0234946; issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,307,831. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,057, filed Oct. 29, 2009 published 2011/0100376. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,492, filed Dec. 15, 2009 published 2011/0144558. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,424, filed Oct. 30, 2009 published 2011/0100378. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,168, filed Oct. 29, 2009 published 2011/0100377. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,482, filed Nov. 30, 2011 *published as US 2013/0133669. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,293, filed Jun. 1, 2012* published as US 2013/0319427. |
International Search Report re: PCT/US2012/0565677 dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/061569. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/067708. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2013 re: PCT/US2013/043238. |
International Search Report dated May 24, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/066011. |
Written Opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/056577. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,402, filed Jul. 30, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/183,955, filed Jul. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/228,681, filed Aug. 14, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/238,991, filed Sep. 26, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/257,563, filed Oct. 24, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/261,102, filed Oct. 30, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,350, filed Dec. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/378,573, filed Feb. 17, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/402,631, filed Mar. 12, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/247,713, filed Sep. 28, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,384, filed Oct. 24, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,704, filed Dec. 8, 2011. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority or the Declaration dated Feb. 3, 2010; PCT/US2009/051921; International Filing Date: Jul. 28, 2009. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority or the Declaration dated May 25, 2010; PCT/US2010/023152; International Filing Date: Apr. 2, 2010. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/052126. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/057661. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061223. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 29, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061455. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 21, 2010 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/052110. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 29, 2010 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/065293. |
International Search Report dated May 25, 2010 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/023152. |
International Search Report dated May 25, 2010 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/025778. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 14, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052628. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 20, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052644. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052649. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059673. |
Nordgard, S. et al ‘One-year results: palatal implants for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea’ Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. May 2007; 136(5): 818-22. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 1, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/052110. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 1, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/052126. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 15, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/051921. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 26, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061223. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 3, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/061455. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 7, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/065293. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 23, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/023152. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 20, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/025778. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 1, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052628. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 1, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052644. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 1, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/052649. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 19, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059673. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 1, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/056577. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 29, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/061569. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 3, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/066011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 10, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/067708. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 2, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/043238. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2010 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/051921. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130150872 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |