This invention relates to a system of noise attenuation around an air induction assembly.
Manufacturers have employed active and passive methods to reduce engine noise within a passenger compartment of a vehicle. Such noise frequently emanates from the engine, travels through the air induction system and emanates out of the mouth of the air intake into the passenger compartment. Efforts have been made to reduce the amount of engine noise traveling through the air induction system. These efforts include the use of both passive devices, such as expansion chambers and Helmholtz resonators, and active devices involving anti-noise generators.
Active systems use a speaker to create a canceling sound that attenuates engine noise. The sound created is out of phase with the engine noise and combines with this noise to result in its reduction. Generally, this sound is generated in proximity to the mouth of the air induction system. In one such system, a control unit, such as a digital signal processor, obtains data from the vehicle engine, creates a predictive model of engine noise, and then generates the appropriate canceling signal based on the results of this model. This signal is then transmitted to the speaker, which transforms this signal into a canceling sound. Because the control unit may not perfectly model engine noise, an error microphone is placed in proximity to the mouth of the air induction system to determine if engine noise need be further attenuated.
The microphone for such a system is typically mounted to the speaker housing and located at the mouth of the air intake. This location, however, subjects this sensitive device to the hostile environment around the air intake mouth, exposing the microphone to road conditions, debris, and foul weather. As a consequence, the microphone may be damaged during vehicle operation resulting in the malfunctioning of the noise attenuation system.
In addition, the noise attenuation system is frequently made of a number of separate components, which require assembly on the production line of the vehicle. These components include the microphone, the speaker and speaker volume, and air filter. The separate assembly of these components into the air induction system accordingly results in reduced productivity.
A need therefore exists to provide a more robust and simplified noise attenuation device for an air induction system.
Like existing noise attenuating devices for air induction systems, the present invention has an air induction body to receive air for a vehicle engine. An air filter serves to filter air that passes through the air induction body. In contrast to existing systems, however, the invention places a microphone of a noise attenuation device within the air filter, thereby protecting the microphone from a variety of hostile conditions and greatly simplifying assembly of the noise attenuation device into the air induction system.
The invention further employs a speaker and speaker chamber. A control unit controls output from the speaker so as to create a noise attenuating sound. The speaker directs this sound towards the engine, the source of noise, through the air filter and the air induction body to thereby attenuate engine noise. In addition, the control unit may receive a signal from the microphone. This signal may represent noise not cancelled by the speaker. Based on the received signals, the control unit may adjust the output of the speaker to further minimize remaining noise.
The invention further includes a novel air filter unit. As mentioned previously, a microphone is placed within the air filter. In addition, a speaker may be mounted to the air filter, which may be radial in shape. The speaker may also be mounted to the speaker chamber, which is itself mounted to the air filter. Accordingly, the speaker and speaker chamber maybe attached to one end of the air filter. The other end may then be attached to the air induction body. The microphone, speaker, speaker chamber and air filter thus form a single unit that may be easily installed into the air induction body.
In this way, the inventive air induction system and air filter unit protects the microphone of a noise attenuation device from debris, hostile weather, and other elements that may damage the microphone. The air filter unit is modular in design and may be quickly installed into the air induction system without separate assembly of the parts on a production line. The invention accomplishes these objectives without significant cost or expense.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
In contrast to existing noise attenuation devices and air induction systems, air induction system 10 protects microphone 22 by disposing microphone 22 within air filter 18 (here shown as a radial air filter). Microphone 22 is essentially jacketed by air filter 18. Further, microphone 22 is spaced between speaker 46 and engine 38 to additionally protect microphone 22 from the hostile elements around the air intake.
The aforementioned description is exemplary rather that limiting. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. Hence, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For this reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/324,699 filed on Sep. 25, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3936606 | Wanke | Feb 1976 | A |
4410065 | Harvey | Oct 1983 | A |
4665549 | Eriksson et al. | May 1987 | A |
4832262 | Robertson | May 1989 | A |
4876722 | Dekker et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4896718 | Trin | Jan 1990 | A |
4947434 | Ito | Aug 1990 | A |
5170019 | Lee | Dec 1992 | A |
5197426 | Frangesch et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5229556 | Geddes | Jul 1993 | A |
5271120 | Eustache et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5319165 | Geddes | Jun 1994 | A |
5336856 | Krider et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5426703 | Hannabe et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426705 | Yokota et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432857 | Geddes | Jul 1995 | A |
5446249 | Goodman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446790 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457749 | Cain et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466899 | Geisenberger | Nov 1995 | A |
5499423 | Joo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513266 | Zuroski | Apr 1996 | A |
5541373 | Cheng | Jul 1996 | A |
5550334 | Langley | Aug 1996 | A |
5587563 | Yazici et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5647314 | Matsumura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5693918 | Bremigan et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5828759 | Everingham | Oct 1998 | A |
5913295 | Sadr et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5946763 | Egner-Walter et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954847 | Shively et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6009705 | Arnott et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6084971 | McLean | Jul 2000 | A |
6160892 | Ver | Dec 2000 | A |
6213077 | Horii | Apr 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 10 292 | Sep 1996 | DE |
0 884 471 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 884 471 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 952 025 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0 992 976 | Apr 2000 | EP |
2 279 778 | Jan 1995 | GB |
10103173 | Apr 1998 | JP |
01238427 | Sep 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030059058 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60324699 | Sep 2001 | US |