In a railway freight car composed of a carbody supported by truck assemblies, side bearing assemblies on each side of the centerline of each truck bolster allow a portion of the carbody weight to be transmitted to the truck bolster at a position laterally outboard of the centerplate when the carbody leans with respect to the truck due to track irregularities, track crosslevel, or centrifugal force. A constant-contact side bearing, hereinafter referred to as a CCSB, includes a loading means to effect a supporting load at such a side bearing when the carbody has not leaned relative to the truck bolster.
In a CCSB, between the normal setup height and the solid stop height, where further leaning of the carbody is resisted by a sharply increased force, the force borne by the side bearing generally increases with increased compression of the side bearing assembly. This force is typically provided by one or more spring elements. These spring elements may be mechanical springs or elastomeric springs. At the solid stop height, another load path through very stiff elements prevents damage to the spring element. There are numerous examples in the industry, and this is well known to those skilled in the art.
A primary purpose of a CCSB is to provide a controlled resistance to truck swivel. When choosing the force which the side bearing design is to provide at the normal setup height, the carbody suspension designer must balance the need for truck hunting control at high speeds with the need for satisfactory curving behavior, especially when the car is in an unloaded condition. Normally, a higher side bearing force produces a more stable condition of the car during travel at high speed. However, if the force is too high, the increased resistance may inhibit the ability of the truck to swivel easily enough to negotiate curves, resulting in at least unnecessary wheel wear and at worst a disastrous derailment.
Association of American Railroads (AAR) standards require that the car design exhibit good stability at speeds up to 70 mph. For curve negotiation, the AAR requires that the normal setup height force be limited to no more than a value predicted by the result of a calculation found in Part B of Specification M-948 of the Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices. This calculation is specific to the car design and requires knowledge concerning the unloaded carbody weight, the distance between truck axles (wheelbase), and the restraint likely to be provided by the centerplate. Typical nominal setup height forces for different models vary between 2200 and 6000 pounds. The AAR Specification M-948 also states that the components which determine the force must have a non-interchangeability feature to prevent the inadvertent assembly of a spring element of a higher force into an assembly intended for a lower design force.
Industry requirements also dictate that the CCSB designs incorporate a method for permanently marking designs of differing forces in such a way that those persons responsible for installing the side bearing may visually determine that the correct model is being used. Additionally, maintenance personnel need to be able to see the model designation while the side bearing is assembled on the car, both to verify that the correct design is applied and, if the spring element is to be replaced, to determine whether or not the necessary replacement parts are available before the side bearing is disassembled.
CCSBs typically have a cage member attached to the truck bolster and a cap member in contact with a wear plate attached to the carbody bolster. The force of the side bearing is provided by a spring element reacting between the cage and the cap. The side bearing force is dependent upon the compression characteristics of the spring element and the design of the cage and cap. The space between truck bolster and carbody side bearing wearplate determines the normal setup height, and is achieved by shimming, ordinarily between the carbody side bearing wearplate and the carbody bolster. In order to meet the AAR requirements for marking, the model designation and nominal force at normal setup height is usually stamped or cast into the cage and/or cap members so as to be visible both before and after assembly onto the car. The non-interchangeability requirement is achieved by including physical features which assure incompatibility of the cage, cap, and spring components.
Some designs have provided for the use of a single spring element for more than one model. In this case, the basic design of the side bearing body or cap may be modified so that the compression of the spring is different for different models. This is a convenience for the user, for only one kind of spring element must be stocked to maintain several models of side bearing. A common method for executing this design is by casting or machining the floor of the cage member to different heights for different models. In this way, the appropriate force for each model is achieved by the appropriate compression at normal setup height. Examples of this method are A. Stucki Company's Compact Column Bearing™, CSB® and SSB® designs. In this case, the appropriate model designation or setup force must be cast or stamped into the member which has been chosen to be produced with variable geometry.
AAR Specifications also require bolsters to maintain a certain flatness in the area of side bearing attachment. In some cases this is requirement is not met. Particularly, the bolster mounting surface can have a “high spot,” e.g., the mounting surface under the center of the cage is higher than the “ears” (the bolt flanges on either side of the cage). Thus, when the side bearing assembly is bolted to the bolster, the cage can experience detrimental stresses and deformations that can inhibit the performance of the unit, or even result in structural failure.
In view of the above, it would be desirable make CCSBs wherein the side bearing force level could be changed, but the same cage, wear cap, and bearing element could be used. In this way, a significant cost savings can be accomplished simply by not having to make a dedicated cage for each different force level side bearing that is needed. Additionally, the CCSB could be designed to prevent the possibility of incorrect assembly while also displaying accurate model numbers or force levels in a readable manner for easy reference. It will also be desirable to provide a CCSB design that is more tolerant to non-flat bolster mounting surfaces.
According to the invention, a modular base side bearing assembly can be provided having a cage portion defining a bearing cavity with a bearing element disposed therein and a wear cap disposed over the bearing element. The cage is provided with a central bottom opening for receiving an interchangeable modular base, upon which the bearing element is supported. The modular base has identification portions which extend from, or are at least plainly visible externally of, the cage when the modular base is assembled with the cage. The modular base is designed to be received in the central bottom opening in cage, with the aforesaid identification portions being visible externally of the cage when the two are assembled together. The identification portions can be marked, or configured, in various ways to identify, for example, a specific force level corresponding to a specific modular base. Different modular bases can have different degrees of thickness at the central portion on which the bearing element is supported. Alternatively, in some embodiments, the modular base may, like the bottom of the cage, have a central opening, i.e., “zero,” such that the bearing element is supported on the same surface to which the cage is mounted. In this manner, the height at which the bearing element is supported, which corresponds to different force levels, can be changed using different modular bases, such that different modular bases can be interchanged with the same cage, bearing element and wear cap. Accordingly, different modular bases can be utilized to provide side bearing assemblies of different force levels without having a dedicated cage for each force level, as is conventionally required to provide side bearings with different force levels.
The modular base is assembled with the cage in a manner to provide a degree of vertical play relative to the cage such that an uneven bolster mounting surface is accommodated without stressing or distorting the cage when the ears are bolted down. For example, the body of the modular base can be fitted into the central bottom opening in the cage in a manner to accommodate non-flat, uneven mounting surfaces. In particular, the modular base can be held in the central bottom opening in a manner to prevent complete detachment, but with enough play in the vertical direction relative to the cage so that the modular base can accept, for example, a high spot in the mounting surface. In this way, the cage will not be distressed when the ears are bolted to the bolster mounting surface.
According to the invention, the cage need not be marked with a specific force level, or other indication thereof. Instead, the force level will be associated with, and identified on, a particular modular base which is used with the cage. In this way, the cage, bearing element, and wear cap can be common to all models, i.e., utilized with different modular bases. The assembly of more than one model, or force level, is produced by the selection of one of a variety of modular bases having different degrees thickness, including zero thickness, which correspond to, and are clearly marked with, different force levels for the side bearing when the specific modular base is assembled therewith. Each modular base has identification portions by which the appropriate model or force information can be positively identified. The shape of the cage and the modular base cooperate so that when the cage is attached to the truck bolster, the modular base cannot be changed and the identification portions of the modular base are plainly visible.
The only variation between different models of side bearing assemblies is the modular base, which identifies the model. Consequently, there can be no case in which the inadvertent selection of a wrong component results in a side bearing with force characteristics different from those indicated by the side bearing assembly once the modular base is assembled therewith.
Referring now to the drawing figures, there is shown in
As illustrated, the upstanding side walls 33 form a generally cylindrical bearing cavity in which is disposed the bearing element 49 and, in the embodiment shown, a wear cap 42, which fits over the bearing element 49, and has downwardly depending side walls 43 that slide within the generally cylindrical bearing cavity formed by the cage 32. The central bottom opening 34 in the cage 32 can have a larger diameter than the bearing element 49, but can have a smaller diameter than the wear cap 42, such that a solid stop is provided by an shelf 44 formed by the central bottom opening 34 which cooperates with a skirt portion 43 of the wear cap 42 to limit the downward travel of the wear cap 42. As shown, the cage 32 also has ears, e.g., bolt flanges 54, 55, at opposite side thereof for fastening the cage 32 to a bolster mounting surface (not shown).
Although the various embodiments of modular base side bearing assemblies illustrated in the drawing figures all have a generally cylindrical bearing cavity in which is disposed a generally cylindrical bearing element, and a generally cylindrical wear cap, it is to be understood that a modular base side bearing assembly could also be formed in, for example, square, rectangular, and other shapes.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the modular base side bearing assembly 30 with modular base 36 can have a free height Hf of about 5 13/16 inches, will go solid at a height Hs of about 4 7/16 inches, and has a nominal set up height Hsu of about 5 1/16 inches. The tolerances for Hs and Hsu can be ± 1/16 inch.
In a preferred embodiment, the central bottom opening 34 in the base of the cage 32, in which is received the modular base 36, can have a diameter (D1) of about 4¼ inches, ± 1/32 of an inch, to provide a limited degree of play so that the modular base 36 can move vertically to some degree (as will be described in more detail hereinafter).
To permit the tabs 40, 41 to be visible externally of the cage 32, openings 37 can be provided, for example, through, or in, the bottom surface of the cage 32 which extend to the outside of the cage 32. As shown, a pair of openings 37 can be provided, one for each tab 40, 41, at opposite sides of the cage 32, through which the tabs 40, 41 project so as to be visible externally of the cage 32. The openings 37 can be formed as a recessed portion of the bottom surface of the cage 32, and can communicate with the central bottom opening 34. In a preferred embodiment, each opening 37 can each be about 5/16 inch in height (h1) and about 3⅝ inches in width (w1). The ears 54, 55 of the cage can be about 27/32 inch thick (t1), and the distance (d1) between the centers of the mounting holes in each ear 54, 55 is about 8½ inches.
The central base portion defines the bottom of the bearing cavity, and thus the thickness of the central base portion 38 defines the height at which the bearing element 49 is supported. The height at which the bearing element 49 is supported corresponds to the force level of the assembled side bearing. Consequently, the thickness of the central base portion 38 defines the force level for the assembled side bearing.
The modular base 36 also has identification portions, or tabs 40 and 41, described above, which project outward from, for example, opposite sides of, the central base portion 38. These tab portions 40, 41 are sized to extend through the openings 37 in the cage 32, such as at opposite sides of the cage 32, such that the tab portions 40, 41 are visible when the modular base 36 is assembled with the cage 32. On the tabs 40, 41 is provided information about the force level of the particular modular side bearing assembly with which the modular base 36 is assembled. Alternatively, the tabs may be configured, such as by providing notches, or indentations, which indicate a particular force level, such as according to the number of notches or indentations provided. Another alternative identification method is color coding, i.e., using different colors to indicate different force levels. In any event, the tap portions 40, 41 are visible and easily readable, even after the side bearing assembly 30 has been installed on a rail vehicle.
The tab portions 40, 41 could be configured to prevent removal of the modular base 36 from the cage 32 after assembly with the cage 32. However, according to preferred embodiments of the invention, upstanding clips 39 (four shown, for example) can be provided which snap onto the shelf 44, which is the travel limiting portion, of the central bottom opening 34 of the cage 32. The modular base 36 can further have an upstanding boss 45 in the center thereof for locating the bottom of the bearing element 49, which can include either a hole through the bearing element 49 or a blind hole in the bottom thereof. However, the more pertinent feature of the modular base 36 relates to the thickness of the central base portion 38 which supports the bearing element 49. The thickness of the central base portion controls the degree of pre-compression on the bearing element 49 when the modular base side bearing assembly 30 is installed. The bottom surface of the modular base 36 will be generally flush with the bottom surface of the cage 32, except for when accommodating an uneven mounting surface, as will be described in more detail hereinafter. Thus, when the modular side bearing assembly 30 is attached to the mounting surface, it is the thickness of the modular central base portion 38 which determines the force level for the modular base side bearing assembly 30. In this way, the force of the modular base side bearing assembly 30 can be changed simply by removing the modular base 36 and replacing it with another modular base which provides a different force level, corresponding to the thickness of the central base portion 38 of the substituted modular base that will form the new bottom of the cavity in the cage 32 on which the bearing element 49 is supported.
Alternatively, embodiments of a modular base, as will be described in more detail hereinafter, can be provided in which the central base portion has zero thickness, i.e., the central base portion is a central opening, and the bearing element 49 is supported on the same surface to which the cage 32 is mounted. The central opening could have side walls which are receivable in the central bottom opening 34 in the cage 32.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the central base portion 38 of the modular base 36 can be generally cylindrical, with an outside diameter (D2) of about 4 3/16 inches and a can have an operating thickness (t2) of about 5/16 inch on which the bearing element 49 is supported. Each identification portion 40, 41 can have a width (w2) of about 2 9/16 inch and can extend radially outward (l2) about 3 5/16 inches from the center of the central base portion 38.
An embodiment of another, interchangeable, modular base 50 is illustrated in
In a presently preferred embodiment, the central base portion 54 of the modular base 50 can also have an outside diameter (D2) of about 4 3/16 inches, the same as the modular base 36, but can have an operating thickness (t3) of about 9/16 inch where the bearing element 49 is supported thereon. Since this dimension is slightly thicker than the 5/16 inch thickness (t2) of the modular base 36, the force level for the side bearing assembly with this modular base 50 will be higher than using the modular base 36 having a thinner central base portion 38. In other respects, the modular base 50 can be identical to the modular base 36, including the tabs 51, 52, having the same width (W2) of about 3 9/16 inch and likewise extending radially outward the same distance (l2) of about 3 9/16 inches from the center of the central base portion 54.
Additionally, in a presently preferred embodiment of the modular base side bearing assembly 60, the free height, H′f can be about 6 1/16 inches, will go solid at a height H′s of about 4 7/16 inches and the set up height H′su can be about 5 1/16 inches. The tolerances for H′s and H′su can be ± 1/16 inch.
An embodiment of another, interchangeable, modular base 70 is illustrated in
As explained above, the central opening 74 is corresponds with the central bottom opening 34 in the cage 32 such that the bearing element 49 will be supported on the mounting surface on which the cage 32 is attached. Accordingly, the “thickness” of the “central base portion” for the modular base 70 is “zero.”
As shown, the modular base 70 similarly has outward extending tabs 71, 72, like the tabs on the previously described modular bases. The tabs 71, 72 likewise protrude through the openings 37 in the bottom surface at opposite sides of the cage 32 when the modular base 70 is assembled therewith. Upstanding clips 79 are likewise provided on the modular base 70 which cooperate with the travel limiting stop formed by the shelf 44 formed by the central bottom opening 34 to retain the modular base 70 against the cage 32.
In this embodiment, the bearing element 49 is not supported on the modular base 70, but rather is supported by the mounting surface on the bolster to which the cage 32 is attached. Thus, the bearing element 49 is supported within the cage 32 at the lowest free height relative to the mounting surface. This results in a minimum preload, and thus a minimum force level for the side bearing assembly 80. The central opening 74 in the modular base 70 can have an outside diameter (D2) of about 4 3/16 inches, like the outer diameter of the central base portions 38 and 54 of the modular bases 36 and 50. In other respects, the modular base 70 can be identical to the modular bases 36 and 50, including the tabs 71, 72, having the same width (w2) of about 3 9/16 inch and likewise extending radially outward the same distance (l2) of about 3 9/16 inches from the center of the central opening 74. The thickness of the tab portions 71, 72 can also be the same as for the tab portions of the modular bases 36 and 50, such that tab portions 71, 72 similarly extend through the same sized openings 37 in the bottom of the cage 32. The tabs portions, 71, 72 likewise prominently display, in some manner, the force level of the side bearing assembly 80 which corresponds particularly to the modular base 70.
In a presently preferred embodiment of the modular base side bearing assembly 80, the free height, H″f can be about 5½ inches, will go solid at a height H″s of about 4 7/16 inches, and the set up height H″su can be about 5 1/16 inches. The tolerances for Hs″ and Hsu″ can be ± 1/16 inch.
As can be understood from the preceding description, according to the invention a modular base side bearing assembly can be provided wherein each of the components of the side bearing assembly can be identical except for an interchangeable, modular base. The thickness of the modular base determines the force level of a given side bearing assembly, and thus side bearing assemblies which provide various different force levels can be provided wherein all of the parts of the assembly are standard except for the modular base. The modular bases can be made in different degrees of thickness, are interchangeable with other modular bases, and each can be assembled with the same standard components, e.g., cage, bearing element, and wear cap to provide side bearing assemblies having variable force levels. The modular base is further designed such that the specific force level of each modular side bearing assembly is plainly visible and easily readable even when the side bearing assembly is installed on the rail vehicle.
The modular base determines the force level of the side bearing assembly, and force level information is provided on the modular base itself. Thus, the force level for the side modular base bearing assembly is not associated with any of the other standard components of the assembly. In this way, there can be no situation in which the inadvertent selection of a wrong component could result in a modular base side bearing assembly having force characteristics different from that which is specifically indicated on the assembly itself.
According to another aspect of the invention, each of the modular bases are designed to be received in the bottom opening 34 in the cage 32 in a manner permitting some degree of vertical play. The assembly of each modular base with the cage 32 is designed to generally hold the modular base 36 to the cage 32 in the bottom opening 34 to prevent complete detachment therebetween, such as the modular base falling away from the cage 32. As shown in the drawing figures, this can be accomplished via the upstanding clips, as described previously. However, these clips do not prevent the modular base from moving vertically upwards relative to the cage 32.
Accordingly, the fit between the central base portion of each modular base and the bottom opening 34 in the cage 32 permits a sufficient degree of vertical displacement of the modular base 36 relative to the cage 32. In this way, the modular base will accommodate a non-flat mounting surface, for example a high spot, so that when the ears 54, 55 of the cage 32 are bolted to the mounting surface no stressing or deformation of the cage 32 will occur.
Annular grooves 43, 53 in the modular base members 36 and 50 can be provided for weight reduction, and also for manufacturing related reasons. In the modular base 70, the underside of the tab portion 71, 72 can be hollow. In regard to the manufacturing reasons, the modular bases can preferably be made by injection molding, such as from, for example, a nylon material. The annular grooves (or hollow tabs) can facilitate the production process because it can be more difficult to injection mold thick sections.
Various other features of the modular base member 36, 50 and 70 are illustrated in the drawing figures, for example, the particular shape of the identification portions and certain presently preferred dimensions. Similarly, the cage 32 is also shown having various features and certain presently preferred dimensions in the various drawing figures. Such information should be understood generally as being associated with certain preferred embodiments of the invention and should not be interpreted as limiting to the invention.
Accordingly, although certain embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it would appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications of those details could be developed in light of the overall teaching of the disclosure. Therefore, the particular embodiments disclosed herein are intended to be illustrative only and not limiting to the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/513,658, filed Oct. 23, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
979120 | Woods | Dec 1910 | A |
1728336 | Downey | Sep 1929 | A |
2394158 | Ellis et al. | Feb 1946 | A |
2647449 | Tucker | Apr 1954 | A |
2821380 | Strandberg | Jan 1958 | A |
3295463 | Barber | Jan 1967 | A |
3401991 | MacDonnell | Sep 1968 | A |
3748001 | Neumann et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3957318 | Wiebe | May 1976 | A |
4080016 | Wiebe | Mar 1978 | A |
4245564 | Eulenfeld | Jan 1981 | A |
4323015 | Hess et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4408810 | Geyer | Oct 1983 | A |
4712487 | Carlson | Dec 1987 | A |
4859089 | Wright | Aug 1989 | A |
4998997 | Carlston | Mar 1991 | A |
5207161 | Pileggi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5386783 | Rhen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401008 | Winkler et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5451110 | Gams et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454330 | Rhen | Oct 1995 | A |
5601031 | Carlson | Feb 1997 | A |
5682822 | Sunderman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6092470 | O'Donnell | Jul 2000 | A |
6581527 | Hewitt | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6708624 | Faryniak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050087092 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60513658 | Oct 2003 | US |