The present invention relates generally to trolling motor mounting systems, and more particularly to trolling motor mounting systems for mounting trolling motors and the like to a boat's outboard or inboard/outboard (I/O) engine.
Electric trolling motors provide anglers with a quiet, smoke-free method of controlling their boat while fishing. They are typically used once an angler has reached a desired fishing location and the main engine is turned off. The size and configuration of the boat in addition to the conditions during which the angler will be fishing are the main factors in determining the thrust that will be needed to maintain proper control of the boat. The thrust provided by the trolling motor, and to a lesser extent the type of fishing preferred by the angler, will typically dictate how and where the trolling motor is mounted on the boat.
Many anglers, particularly those with smaller boats, often mount their trolling motor from the bow or transom of the boat. Transom mounting of the trolling motor is often used for anglers who use electric power exclusively and for traditional walleye anglers who like to backtroll. However, since the bow of a boat is pointed, a bow mount for a trolling motor provides a distinct advantage to control the boat in wind and waves. In either of these positions, however, the shaft length from the mount to the lower unit will limit, to some degree, the size of motor that can be used. In other words, for a bow mount trolling motor the length of the shaft for the mount to the lower unit will traverse the distance from the top of the bow to the water line plus, typically, 18 inches. With a large thrust motor, the amount of torque that is generated over this distance can be significant.
For larger boats that need higher thrust trolling motors, or for those fisherman who fish in adverse conditions and therefore require higher thrust, anglers often opt for an engine mounted trolling motor. Such engine mounted electric trolling motors typically utilize a formed or stamped metal bracket to permanently mount onto an I/O or outboard motor. One such product manufactured by the assignee of the instant application is illustrated in
While such engine mounted trolling motors provide a distinct advantage for larger vessels and for anglers fishing in adverse conditions, e.g. high winds or waves, their application has been somewhat limited, primarily to fresh water applications. This is because many salt water vessels are much larger, requiring more thrust than is available from the current technology of trolling motors. Further, the permanent mounting brackets for these engine mounted trolling motors accommodate only a single size trolling motor. If a different size trolling motor is desired, the entire assembly, including the mounting bracket, must be removed and replaced. Therefore such trolling motors are not adaptable to changing conditions, loads, etc. that dictate the thrust requirements from such a trolling motor.
There exists, therefore, a need in the art for an engine mounted trolling motor bracket that can accommodate different sized trolling motors, different lower units, and that may allow for the inclusion of additional trolling motors or lower units when the thrust requirements of the vessel, or those dictated by the fishing conditions, so require.
In view of the above, it is an objective of the present invention to provide a new and improved mounting bracket for an engine mounted trolling motor. More particularly, it is an objective of the present invention to provide a new and improved mounting bracket for an engine mounted trolling motor that can accommodate different sized trolling motors and/or different sized lower units. It is a further objective of the present invention to provide a new and improved bracket for an engine mounted trolling motor that may also accommodate the inclusion of multiple trolling motors or lower units to increase the thrust available to control the vessel. It is a further objective to provide such a modular mounting bracket that may still be permanently mounted to the cavitation plate of the main I/O or outboard engine of the vessel.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the modular engine mounted bracket is made of composite materials. Preferably the bracket includes a lower mounting engine mounted (EM) bracket that may be permanently affixed to the cavitation plate of the main outboard or inboard/outboard (I/O) engine of a water craft. The modular bracket also includes a single EM top cap that may be used to secure the trolling motor or lower unit in position on the lower mounting EM bracket. Removable front and rear adaptor rings are also provided to accommodate different sized lower units and/or trolling motors with the modular bracket of the present invention.
To allow for substantially increased thrust availability, the modular bracket of the present invention also includes a dual mounting bracket that mates with the lower mounting EM bracket to accommodate multiple trolling motors or lower units. These multiple trolling motors or lower units would be secured to the dual mounting bracket by using the EM top cap in similar fashion as is used to secure a single trolling motor or lower unit on the lower mounting EM bracket itself. In a further embodiment, three trolling motors may be accommodated by utilizing a tri-mounting bracket secured on the lower mounting EM bracket and utilizing the EM top caps in similar fashion.
Through the modularity of the design of the mounting bracket of the present invention, an angler now may utilize different sized trolling motors to supply the different thrust requirements as may be dictated by the load in the fishing vessel and/or the conditions under which the vessel will be subjected during the fishing excursion. Incremental increases in thrust capability, as well as doubling and tripling the thrust capability are accommodated through this modular design. This modular design also allows the expensive trolling motor to be removed and safely stowed away without removing the mounting bracket from the cavitation plate itself. Additionally, from a manufacturing standpoint, the modularity allows an OEM to supply a broad range of product offerings without having to stock a large number of different brackets.
In alternate embodiments the modular mounting bracket of the present invention may be made from various materials utilizing various processes such as machining or welding or other forms of fabrication. Depending on the conditions under which the bracket will be used, Ferrous or non-Ferrous metals as well as other types of plastic resins, composites or epoxies may be used to fabricate the bracket of the present invention.
The modularity of the bracket of the present invention enables a manufacturer to offer a large number of products with different thrust potentials that fit various applications, allowing for operation in both fresh water and salt water applications, while limiting the investment required to accomplish this. To date, there have been no reasonable solutions that provide an economic means of facilitating multiple trolling motor configurations through the use of a single modular bracket system.
Other aspects, objectives and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
While the invention will be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, there is no intent to limit it to those embodiments. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
To provide the adaptability of different thrust trolling motors in an engine mount (EM) configuration, the modular bracket of the present invention utilizes a common mounting bracket with interchangeable elements. As such, the single modular mounting bracket of the present invention may accommodate different sized trolling motors in each of a single, double, or even triple trolling motor configuration. Additionally, in the double and triple trolling motor configuration, there is no requirement that the trolling motors be of the same size.
Turning now to the drawings, wherein like numbers refer to like elements, there is illustrated in
Preferably, the modular bracket 100 of the present invention is made from composite materials that reduce the weight and cost of the bracket 100 while increasing its ruggedness to allow for application in both salt water as well as fresh water applications. In a highly preferred embodiment, the modular bracket 100 of the present invention is made from a polyarylamide resin, e.g. IXEF 1022 manufactured by Solvay S.A. However, alternate embodiments of the modular bracket 100 of the present invention are made by machining, welding, or other various forms of fabrication. Still further, alternate embodiments of the present invention are made from ferrous metals, non-ferrous metals, other types of plastic resins, composites or epoxies depending on the particular application for which this modular bracket 100 is designed.
As illustrated in greater detail in
The central support carriage 110 of the lower mounting EM bracket 102 also includes a plurality of fastener mounting structures 122 that define therethrough mounting holes 124 to receive fasteners 112 (see
The central support carriage 110 is held in proper orientation by a pair of forwardly downwardly depending mounting legs 132, 134. These mounting legs 132, 134 are formed or coupled to either side of the central supporting carriage 110 to provide a rigid support for securing the trolling motor in proper orientation above the cavitation plate. In this way, when the vessel is on plane during use of the main engine, the central support carriage 110 is positioned out of the water to eliminate any drag that would otherwise be present during such operation.
Each of the mounting legs 132, 134 terminates at a lower end thereof in a mounting land 136, 138. These mounting lands 136, 138 are secured on the top surface of the cavitation plate by fasteners 104 (see
The mounting lands 136, 138 also include, in a preferred embodiment, at least one cable guide claw 142, 144. In such an embodiment the cable guide claws 142, 144 may be used to position the trolling motor/lower unit control/power cable when mounted on the vessel. In this embodiment, the cable is held between the cavitation plate on which the lower mounting EM bracket is secured and the cable guide claw 142, 144. The cable may then be routed back along the cavitation plate and up the outboard or I/O as is conventional.
In an embodiment of the present invention wherein the lower mounting EM bracket is made of composite material, each of the mounting legs 132, 134 includes a plurality of strengthening ribs 146. These ribs increase the strength and rigidity of the mounting legs while minimizing the weight of the overall bracket 102. Preferably, these strengthening ribs 146 extend vertically along the mounting legs 132, 134 and horizontally across mounting lands 136, 138. The support ribs 146 may also be seen in the cross-sectional side view illustration of
The top view illustration of the lower mounting EM bracket 102 of
The end view illustration of the lower mounting EM bracket 102 shown in
The EM top cap 108 is illustrated in isometric form in
The side view illustration of the EM top cap 108 better illustrates the trailing radiused surface 150 and the cowl portion 152 provided by the EM top cap 108. As may be seen from the top isometric view of
In operation, the modular EM bracket 100 of the present invention secures the trolling motor 160 between the EM top cap 108 and the lower mounting EM bracket 110 as illustrated in
One of the advantages provided by the modular bracket of the present invention is its ability to accommodate different models and configurations of trolling motors to provide a wide product offering without having to stock a wide variety of brackets. While the preceding discussion illustrated the modular bracket 100 of the present invention's ability to accommodate a trolling motor/lower unit, this bracket 100 may also accommodate multiple trolling motors/lower units as illustrated in
As shown in the isometric illustration of the dual mounting bracket 170 of
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment of the dual mounting bracket 170, the dual mounting bracket 170 is also made of a composite material. In this embodiment, the structure 178 provides double-walled end structures 180, 182 with supporting ribs 184, 186 to provide the required rigidity for the structures. Interior support ribs 188 as well as longitudinal support walls 190 complete the trough closure structure 178. The central mounting yoke 172 also includes the keying structures 130 to insure that the dual mounting bracket 170 is only mounted in one orientation on the lower mounting EM bracket 102.
The orientation of the lateral support carriages 174, 176 in relation to the central mounting yoke 172 may be better seen from the top view illustration of
To provide even more flexibility in selecting different sized trolling motors/lower units, without requiring the angler to purchase different brackets, a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes adaptor rings that may be used to secure smaller trolling motors in the bracket of the present invention. These adaptor rings can be of varying sizes so as to provide a wide range of compatibility with trolling motors/lower units of different sizes.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirely herein.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D121623 | Casey | Jul 1940 | S |
3139853 | McCarthy et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3596625 | Guenther | Aug 1971 | A |
4200055 | Siegel | Apr 1980 | A |