As telecommunications applications require higher frequency performance and more controlled performance per standards such as IEEE 802.3 an 10GBASE-T, ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2, IEC 60603-7-41, ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B, etc. . . . , the performance of modular plug cords (e.g., twisted pair cable terminated to modular plugs) becomes more critical. Connectors (e.g., outlets or jacks having printed circuit board (PCB), flex circuits or lead frame connections to various terminal blocks) are designed and defined by their performance related to the range of electrical plug performance they are tested with (as defined in TIA and IEC documents and others). The outlet performance can be improved by limiting the range/variability of plugs (or modular plug cords including two plugs) the outlet is mated with. Since most manufacturers sell their connectors with their own modular plug cords, one can improve performance by tuning to and reducing the variability of cord production, while complying with industry standards (i.e., TIA or ISO/IEC limits).
Telecommunications connectors are often used with multi-pair cable. The wire lay (pairs of wires twisted around each other over a predetermined length) results in an orientation of pairs in one end that is a mirror image of the other end. The inherent nature of twisted pair cable results in a mirror image pattern when you cut a piece of cable to terminate plugs. Existing standard plug designs have one set of termination pattern that then requires one end or both ends of the cable to cross pairs to align them properly for termination. This crossing or manipulation of pairs or untwisting of pairs results in significant variation by adding an uncontrolled crosstalk element.
In existing plugs, the front-end contacts pierce individual conductors in the cable and make contact with the inner wire. The contact is set within the plug body. However, there is variability in where the contact sits and the location of the twisted pairs, which leads to electrical transmission variation as well as dimensional variation. This crimp height variation causes multiple problems, specifically, undetermined coupling from the surface area of the plates, as well as inconsistent mating to outlets. Inconsistent crimp height can arrange the mated outlet contacts in undesirable positions causing various levels of crosstalk that cannot be appropriately compensated for.
Additionally, in existing plugs, the pairs within the cable need to be untwisted to access the front-end contacts. The untwisting of the pair is typically inconsistent and results in crossed pairs causing various levels of crosstalk that cannot be appropriately compensated for.
Thus, there is a need in the art for a telecommunications connector having reduced termination variability to improve performance (e.g., crosstalk reduction) of the mated connectors.
Embodiments of the invention include a telecommunications connector assembly including a cable having a first pair of twisted wires and a second pair of twisted wires; a first connector having a first substrate having a first termination area, the first pair of twisted wires provided for electrical termination on a first side of the first substrate, the second pair of twisted wires provided for electrical termination on a second side of the first substrate, the second side opposite the first side; a second connector having a second substrate having a second termination area, the second pair of twisted wires provided for electrical termination on the first side of the second substrate, the first pair of twisted wires provided for electrical termination on the second side of the second substrate, the second side opposite the first side.
Plug housing 102 contains a substrate 104 which establishes an electrical connection between plug contacts 106 and wire contacts 108. The wire contacts 108 may be positioned on a contact carrier 110. The substrate 104 may be a printed circuit board, flexible circuit material, multi-dimensional PCB, etc. having traces 105 (
Plug contacts 106 have a press fit tail 112 that is received in a plated through hole 114 in substrate 104. Traces on substrate 104 establish electrical connection between plated through hole 114 and wire contacts 108. Plug contacts 106 extend through slots 116 (
Wire contacts 108 include press fit tails that extend through contact carrier 110 and engage plated through holes 107 (
As shown in
The exemplary embodiments described above use a single substrate 104 with different wire contact locations for each end of the cable. In other words, the wire termination configurations on each end of the cable are different so as to prevent crossing of wire pairs. Wire contacts 108 are positioned on the top of substrate 104, for the orange and blue pairs (
The embodiment of
By positioning the wire contacts for a pair of wires on opposite sides of the substrate on opposite ends of the cable, the wire pairs in cable 200 do not need to be crossed at one end of the cable. For example, the blue wire pair is terminated to the top of substrate 1041 and terminated to the bottom of substrate 1042. This is consistent with the position of the blue wire pair at each end of the cable 200. Thus, the wire pairs 202 do not need to be crossed and wire pair untwist is minimized as well. This results in much more predictable wire termination and reduces variability in electrical performance of the modular plug cords because wire termination is more predictable. When the electrical performance of the modular plug cords has less variation, it is easier to compensate for electrical performance (e.g., NEXT, FEXT) either on substrate 104 or elsewhere in the channel (e.g., outlet, cable).
Further, the design allows cable having a larger diameter conductors to be terminated to the plug. Existing plugs have a fixed width and these plugs are typically limited to terminating 24 AWG conductors. Because the plug embodiment shown has the cable centered about the substrate with two wire pairs on top and two wire pairs on the bottom, the plug can terminate 23 and 22 AWG conductors 202. Thus, exemplary embodiments can terminate cables having conductors 202 in a range of 27 AWG to 22 AWG.
The electrical performance of the plug may be tuned using features on the substrate 104 such as circuit traces. The tuning of the plug may be performed to address electrical performance characteristics such as near end crosstalk (NEXT), return loss, far end crosstalk (FEXT), and balance, etc. Because the wire pairs do not need to be untwisted or crossed to terminate the wire pairs, plug 100 can be tuned more precisely (lower variation) and more accurately (targeted performance level within specifically allowed range).
Further, the ability to tune electrical performance of each plug on a modular plug cord allows the plug performance characteristics to be adjusted to enhance performance of an entire channel. For example, a first plug on one end of a modular plug cord may be tuned to perform at a low end of a defined range and a second plug on the other end of the modular plug cord tuned to perform at a high end of the defined range. In exemplary embodiments, the defined range relates to Category 5e, 6, 6A, and higher performance as defined by industry standards ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B (/568) Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard and ISO/IEC 11801 (/11801). The tuning of plugs to achieve certain transmission performance is described in further detail in U.S. patent application publication 20040116081, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Assembly of the plug is described with reference to
Wires are then terminated to wire contacts 108 using known techniques. The subassembly of
In an alternate embodiment discussed herein, the wire contacts 108 are exposed when substrate 104 is fully inserted in housing 102. Wire pairs 202 are terminated to the wire contacts 108 as described above. A non-conductive strain relief member is then slid over the cable 200 and attached to the housing 102 to cover wire contacts 108.
As noted above, instead of a substrate such as a PCB, the plug may utilize a lead frame design where the wire contacts 108 and plug contacts 106 are formed on common, metal leads. In this alternative, the locations of the wire contacts is similar to that shown in
Embodiments of the invention allow the wire pairs to be terminated on the device from either end without crossing over a pair or having to split a pair as in the case of industry standard wiring schemes TIA-568A/TIA-568B. The plug contacts 106 may have non-standard profiles to increase performance and eliminate variability in height and location. The reduction in variability leads to a more consistent electrical performance. This also results in reduced cost, as less operator input is needed in the manufacture of the plug.
The above embodiments are described with reference to a plug. The wire termination may also be used with other connectors, such as modular outlets. As described above, the modular outlets include substrates such as those shown in
The plugs/outlets may be equipped with other components such as active/passive identification circuitry (e.g., RFID). Security chips may be added to plugs/outlets in embodiments of the invention as described in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/493,332, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Further, plugs/outlets in embodiments of the invention may include tunable elements such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/485,210, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments of the invention provide for ease of termination of wires at the wire contacts without crossing wire pairs. This results in reduced variability and better transmission performance in the plug and the mated connector due to termination design. Reducing variability in wire termination results in reduced crosstalk and enhances the ability to compensate for crosstalk, as the crosstalk is more predictable.
Shield tabs 506 extend from the flexible circuit 500. Traces on the flex circuit 500 connect the shield tabs 506 to a shield pad 508. The shield pad 508 is placed in electrical connection with a shield on cable 200 (e.g., solder, IDC or other mechanical fastener). Shield tabs 506 are conductive and extend beyond plug housing to make electrical contact with a conductive outlet housing, thereby rendering ground continuity from cable 200, through the plug and into the outlet. The flex circuit 500 may be easily shielded by applying a foil (and any needed intermediate insulator) on each side of the flex circuit 500.
Additional conductive regions may be used for alternate connections. For example, connectivity region 512 is an exposed conductive region that may mate with a connectivity conductor on an outlet to detect plug-outlet connections. Traces on the flex circuit 500 electrically connect connectivity region 512 with a connectivity pad 514. The connectivity pad 514 on flex circuit 500 provides a location to make electrical contact (e.g., solder, IDC) with a wire in cable 200 for systems that use an additional conductor to transmit connectivity signals. The use of a flex circuit 500 reduces part count for the plug and provides additional space in the plug housing for shielding or other components.
Plug contacts 406 have press fit tails that are received in plated through holes in substrate 404. Traces on substrate 404 establish electrical connection between plated through holes and wire contacts 408. Plug contacts 406 extend through slots 416 in plug housing 402 to establish contact with outlet contacts (not shown) when plug 400 is mated with an outlet (not shown). In alternate embodiments, the plug contacts 406 are soldered in substrate 404. The plug contacts 406 may have press fit tails, solder tails, compliant pin, mechanically secured tails, or other connection-types for establishing electrical and mechanical connection in plated through holes.
Wire contacts 408 include press fit tails that extend through contact carrier 410 and engage plated through holes in substrate 404 beneath contact carrier 410. Four wire contacts 408 extend from a first surface of the substrate and four wire contacts 408 extend from a second surface of the substrate 404. As described above, the arrangement of the wire contacts on the substrate 404 allows the twisted wire pairs to be terminated to the wire contacts 408 without crossing wire pairs from their original position on either end of a modular plug cord or other assembly. Thus, the embodiment of
An insulating isolation member 430 is positioned over wire contacts 408 to prevent the wire contacts 408 from contacting a conductive shield member 432. Conductive shield member 432 is made from a conductive material such as metal, metalized plastic, conductive plastic, etc.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt to a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed for carrying out this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/947,966 filed Nov. 30, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/872,075 filed Dec. 1, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, and this application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/920,768 filed Mar. 29, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4412715 | Bogese, II | Nov 1983 | A |
5478252 | Lecomte et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5692925 | Bogese, II | Dec 1997 | A |
5905637 | Su | May 1999 | A |
5961354 | Hashim | Oct 1999 | A |
5967801 | Martin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971812 | Martin | Oct 1999 | A |
5999400 | Belopolsky et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6083047 | Paagman | Jul 2000 | A |
6089923 | Phommachanh | Jul 2000 | A |
6109971 | Vadlakonda | Aug 2000 | A |
6113400 | Martin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116943 | Ferrill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6194652 | Ivan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6293818 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296532 | Harting et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305950 | Doorhy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354865 | Bogese | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371793 | Doorhy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379157 | Curry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380485 | Beaman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6464541 | Hashim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527594 | Korsunsky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6592395 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617939 | Vermeersch | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7186148 | Hashim | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201618 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7474737 | Crudele et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20040116081 | Crudele et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040216914 | Vexler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060131056 | Hackman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090149082 | Leubner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100003863 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60872075 | Dec 2006 | US | |
60920768 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11947966 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 12559647 | US |