This application is the U.S. national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/IT2012/000007 filed on Jan. 10, 2012, which claims priority to Italian Patent Application No. TO2011A000016 filed on Jan. 13, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
This invention pertains to a modular construction system used for reinforcing all shapes of foundation, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators for variable-geometry formwork.
Notedly, a formwork is a structure used in the building and construction trade to build the reinforced concrete works. It provides a casing into which the additional concrete in the liquid state is cast, after the reinforcement irons have been properly positioned and tied together with their attached structural brackets, where the concrete stays until the completion of the setting process and after the cast has, once the hardening phase has started, achieved such mechanical strength as to guarantee the absorption of the stress which the structure has to withstand soon after the conventional formwork itself has been taken apart.
Formworks can be made of several materials; in particular, “disposable” formworks are currently available for building and construction purposes (in particular, used for building uni-directional lofts and masonry), which are made up of blocks featuring hollows and of polystyrene foam panels made by means of the technique generally referred to as Insulated Concrete Form (ICF), as well as of their respective spacing connectors, which are co-stamped disposable items needed for the assembling and internal blocking of the various aforesaid panels making up the shuttering mould of a reinforced concrete wall.
Though the connectors currently employed simply, to a significant extent, the assembling of “disposable” (though static) formworks, for positioning the pillar reinforcement irons (the latter being typically in the form of steel rods), conventional methods are still applied, which entail the longitudinal and vertical positioning of reinforcement rods essentially in accordance with two methods:
Thus, the aim of this invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems relative to the older method, by providing a unique, dynamic modular construction system to be used for simple, quick application of the foundation reinforcements, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators for transpiring, “disposable”, heat-insulation and variable-geometry formworks, which will make it possible to easily, conveniently and quickly fit the reinforcement irons for such pillars, regardless of the relevant section and shape.
One further aim of this invention is to provide a dynamic modular construction system for reinforcing any one shape of foundation, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators for transpiring, “disposable”, heat-insulation and variable-geometry formwork, made up of modular elements easy to be placed into position in accordance with the most varied design requirements, such modular elements being able to be carried easily due to their being lightweight, modular and able to be overlapped one another while taking up very small volumes, the latter peculiarity being advantageous to ensure both environment protection and practical application in building sites situated in broken ground areas, indeed by giving obvious construction advantages especially in downtown districts, where the spaces are taken up by dwellers.
Furthermore, one aim of this invention is to provide a dynamic modular construction system for assembling the reinforcement for a large number of foundation, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators for transpiring, “disposable”, heat-insulation and variable-geometry formwork, which consists of elements able to be easily positioned in accordance with the most varied structural design requirements and also easily assembled by constant measuring pitches, to guarantee homogeneous strength, indeed also in order to guarantee safety and the building site.
The above and the other aims and advantages of the invention, as detailed in the description hereafter, will be obtained by making use of a dynamic modular construction system used for reinforcing foundation, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators for transpiring, “disposable”, heat-insulation and variable-geometry formwork, like the one described in accordance with claim 1. Preferred embodiment designs and original variants of this invention will be the object of the relevant claims.
It is obvious that a number of variants and modifications can be made to the described items (e.g. variants and modifications concerning the coupling of several insulating panels with the respective variable-pitch reinforcement, as well as concerning the shape dimensions, arrangements and the parts performing equivalent functions) without departing from the scope of protection of the invention, as referred to in the enclosed claims.
This invention will be best described by a few preferred embodiments, which will be provided by way of example and with no limitation thereto, with reference to the enclosed drawings, where:
By referring to the Figures, you can notice that the dynamic modular construction system 1 used for reinforcing the various types of foundation, pillars, isolated footings, anti-seismic separators (even featuring complex shapes and lying in sloping, vertical or horizontal positions) intended for transpiring, “disposable”, heat-insulation and variable-geometry formwork, includes at least one guide plane 10 for the vertical elements (which will be referred to, for the sake of concision, as “irons” hereafter) making up such reinforcement, and at least one supporting bracket 30 for such plane 10, such bracket 30 being suited to make it possible to install the guide plane 10 relative to a transpiring, “disposable” heat-insulation formwork (not shown) and, in particular, a formwork made of EPS polystyrene foam panels in accordance with the Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) method.
By referring to
The iron-guide through-opening 13 shall preferably feature the shape of a truncated cone, as defined as elastic tabs 14 suited to confer centrality to the reinforcement iron placed inside it (regardless of the diameter of the same). Furthermore, the elastic tabs 14 guarantee full iron wrapping by the concrete (and, thus, adequate adhesion), as well as compliance with the international standards and regulations with regard to the bar-cover. Moreover, the peculiar shape of elastic tabs 14 (exactly with the shapes of the various types by oblong IPE, HE, UPN −T bars) placed into the iron-guide through-openings 13 of guide plane 10, as properly shaped to accommodate the irons themselves, will allow perfect hooking of any one diameter of oblong rod and/or of IPE, HE, UPN −T arranged vertically, and the same elastic tabs 14 will firmly keep the structural elements when the additional concrete is cast.
The use of guide plane 10 with the iron-guide taper bushing through-openings 13, during the packing phase, as well as of properly packed concrete featuring a medium-to-fine grain mix, will, when combined with appropriate reinforcement covering due to the perfect binding of the vertical and horizontal reinforcements in the iron-guide taper bushing through-openings 13 themselves, productively allow the manufactured item to feature high structural strength, fire protection (REI) and durability. Furthermore, by considering that, thanks to the guide plate 10 of the system referred to in the present invention, the vertical irons are made to run only inside the iron-guide taper bushing through-openings 13, a minimum concrete wrapping of 2.5 cm between two subsequent irons of longitudinal reinforcements will be guaranteed, regardless of the iron diameter, thus ensuring greater structural strength and REI fire protection, that is to say, thus ensuring evident, longer manufactured item durability.
In particular, as you can notice in
Obviously, the connecting portion 31 may be equipped with any one connecting means, the latter being a mechanical connecting means or any one lock-in profile that will make it possible to connect the supporting bracket 30 of the dynamic construction system referred to in the present invention with the corresponding lock-in profile of any one panel known in the relevant trade, without therefore departing from the scope of protection of this invention. In particular, the connecting portion 31 includes at least one lock-in profile shaped essentially like a ‘T’ (35′, 35″, 35′″) suited to be inserted into the corresponding T-shaped lock-in profiles of nearly all of the panels (even made of EPF) known in the relevant trade: the lock-in profile will, in order to facilitate the insertion thereof into the panel's lock-in profile inside, be equipped with at least one adequately flared lower portion.
The supporting portion 33 will, instead, include at least one support bracket 37′, 37″, 37′″ suited to support at least one edge portion of guide plane 10, such bracket 37′, 37″, 37′″ being preferably equipped with at least one connecting means, such as, for instance, al elastic pin 39′, 39″, 39′″ suited to fit into the inside of one of the connection seats 15 of guide plane 10 and also grip, due to interference, inside the same owing to elastic expansion of elastic pin 39′, 39″, 39′″ itself.
At least one supporting saddle 41′, 41″, 41′″ may preferably be placed in between the connecting portion 31 and the supporting portion 33, such supporting saddle being suited to support, in a constrained fashion, one or several reinforcement irons arranged horizontally with no diameter constraints.
Moreover, the supporting bracket 30 may include one connecting means 43 used for connection with a transpiration duct (not shown) leading out of connecting portion 31 through at least one end opening 45, such transpiration duct being suited to productively allow, by placing (if necessary) one check valve (not shown) in between, transpiration from the reinforcement inside towards the outside through the panels of the transpiring, “disposable” heat-insulation formwork, due to the effect of the pressure difference that will obviously take place.
In one preferred embodiment of the supporting bracket 30 relative to the dynamic construction system referred to in the present invention, such as the one shown in the Figure, you can notice that the bracket 30 itself may be made up of a plurality of modules (for instance, bracket 30 in the Figure is made up of three modules A′, A″, A′″) connected with one another by placing pre-established score lines T′, T″ in between, each of said modules A′, A″, A′″ being made up of at least one of such lock-in profiles shaped essentially like a ‘T’ (35′, 35″, 35′″), at least one of such support brackets 37′, 37″, 37′″ with, if necessary, at least one respective elastic pin 39′, 39″, 39′″ and, if necessary, at least one supporting saddle 41′, 41″, 41′″. As a result, for instance, module A′ of bracket 30 is made up of l lock-in profile shaped essentially like a ‘T’ 35′, as well as of the support bracket 37′ with elastic pin 39′ and the supporting saddle 41′, whereas module A′″ is made up of l lock-in profile shaped essentially like a ‘T’ 35″, as well as of the support bracket 37″ with elastic pin 39″ and the supporting saddle 41″, whereas module A′″ is made up of l lock-in profile shaped essentially like a ‘T’ 35′″, the support bracket 37′″ with elastic pin 39′″ and the supporting saddle 41′″.
Obviously, though each dynamic construction modules is, by way of example, made up of only one profile, one bracket and one saddle, it can obviously be anticipated that the bracket 30 may take any other shape with different quantities of the aforesaid elements, even differing from one another according to the individual modules, without therefore departing from the scope of protection of this invention.
This feature will thus allow highly dynamic and modular installation of the construction system 1 referred to in the present invention; in fact, bracket 30 may, according to the specific structural requirements, either be used as a whole item or being divided, by being broken along the pre-established score lines T′, T″ to obtain a bracket 30 featuring smaller dimensions. Moreover, still in order to guarantee accurate positioning of reinforcement irons, the same lock-in profiles shaped essentially like a ‘T’ 35′, 35″, 35′″ may be equipped with at least one respective removable tab 47′, 47″, 47′″: in particular, the removable tab 47′, 47″, 47′″ may be removed from the lock-in profile shaped essentially like a ‘T’ (35′, 35″, 35′″) by being broken along a score line 49′, 49″, 49′″ so as to change the height of positioning bracket 30 along the panel of the transpiring, “disposable” heat-insulation formwork once such lock-in profile 35′, 35″, 35′″ has been inserted into the respective lock-in profile of the panel itself, and also allow highly accurate positioning (heightwise) of guide plane 10 in which closed and/or opened U-shaped steel structural brackets can be housed horizontally, such structural brackets featuring proper 45° bend in the end portion for perfect overlapping (not shown) and being firmly constrained by special elastic pins.
By referring to
As you can notice in
Furthermore, as you can notice in
According to another preferred embodiment such as the one shown in
According to one further preferred embodiment such as the one shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2011A0016 | Jan 2011 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IT2012/000007 | 1/10/2012 | WO | 00 | 7/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/095883 | 7/19/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3151391 | Ollier | Oct 1964 | A |
3335262 | Smart et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3728835 | McManus | Apr 1973 | A |
4136798 | Oberstein | Jan 1979 | A |
4472331 | Kida | Sep 1984 | A |
4546580 | Ueno et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4731968 | Obino | Mar 1988 | A |
4833857 | Wheeler | May 1989 | A |
5383319 | Sorqvist | Jan 1995 | A |
5428933 | Philippe | Jul 1995 | A |
5499476 | Adams et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5687530 | Van der Heijden | Nov 1997 | A |
5788152 | Alsberg | Aug 1998 | A |
6170202 | Davoodi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6370831 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6451400 | Brock et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467224 | Bertolini | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7082732 | Titishov | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7587865 | Moller, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8020783 | Backman, Jr. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8181414 | Garrett | May 2012 | B2 |
8429860 | Kugler et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20030061772 | Bertolini | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089051 | Bertolini | May 2003 | A1 |
20040103609 | Wostal et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050028466 | Titishov | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050252109 | Fuccella et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060070314 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070214740 | O'Grady | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080172972 | Williams | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090026192 | Fuhrman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044481 | Turek | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100065716 | Amend | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100107541 | Bohnhoff | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2264099 | Feb 1998 | CA |
367966 | Mar 1963 | CH |
2013630 | Nov 1971 | DE |
3410484 | Oct 1985 | DE |
9418036 | Jan 1995 | DE |
4332115 | Mar 1995 | DE |
29611835 | Nov 1996 | DE |
102008050741 | Apr 2010 | DE |
0137105 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0163117 | Dec 1985 | EP |
0368804 | May 1990 | EP |
0803618 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1092816 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1605113 | Dec 2005 | EP |
663193 | Aug 1929 | FR |
2328814 | May 1977 | FR |
2813903 | Mar 2002 | FR |
2874950 | Mar 2006 | FR |
2002348858 | Dec 2002 | JP |
9119055 | Dec 1991 | WO |
03046310 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005014948 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005035898 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005061804 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006063140 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006081678 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2008098686 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/IT2012/000007, Completed by the European Patent Office on Jun. 25, 2012, 3 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130283714 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |