The present invention relates generally to an apparatus for balancing an orbital abrading machine. More particularly, the present invention apparatus relates to balancing an orbital abrading machine while the machine is operating under load. The present invention apparatus includes a counterweight element that can be readily detached and replaced to enable the balancing of the machine under different loading conditions.
Orbital abrading machines are well-known and generally comprise a portable, manually manipulatable housing, a motor supported by the housing and having or being coupled to a drive shaft driven for rotation about a first axis, and an assembly for mounting a pad for abrading a work surface for orbital movement about the first axis. In a random orbital abrading machine, the assembly serves to additionally mount the pad for free rotational movement about a second axis, which is disposed parallel to the first axis.
The assembly typically includes a head portion coupled for driven rotation with the drive shaft about the first axis and defining a mounting recess having an axis arranged coincident with the second axis, a bearing supported within the mounting recess, and means for connecting the pad to the bearing for rotation about the second axis.
An orbital machine having an element, such as pad, driven for movement about an orbital path of travel is by nature unbalanced and tends to produce vibrations, which may be felt by the hands of an operator of the machine. With a view towards maintaining such vibrations at acceptable levels, it has been common practice to employ a counterbalance system of the type described in Chapter 12 Mechanisms and Dynamics of Machinery, Third Edition, by Hamilton H. Mabie and Fred W. Ocvirk, published by John Wiley and Sons, which is incorporated by reference herein. The aforementioned design approach, commonly referred to as “dynamic” balancing, accounts only for the unbalance which is created by the mass centers of the pad and portions of the assembly not disposed concentric to the first axis. Dynamic balancing adds counterweight masses to the housing that are symmetrically positioned with respect to a radial plane of the second axis.
Dynamic balancing can create a machine that is balanced, that is, has acceptably low vibration levels, while the machine is running at free speed in an unloaded condition. However, once the machine is loaded, as a result of placing the pad in abrading engagement with a work surface, additional forces are introduced and the machine becomes unbalanced. This unbalance is detected by the operator in the form of vibration. This vibration is undesirable and in severe cases, may lead to vibration-induced injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome and white finger.
An improved design approach shown in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,206,771 (Lehman), which is incorporated by reference herein, and which is hereinafter referred to as Lehman, employs counterbalancing in such a manner as to minimize vibrations under actual working conditions. However, the counterbalancing disclosed in Lehman is only effective for predetermined operating conditions.
What is needed then is a convenient and cost-effective means of balancing an orbital abrading machine to minimize vibrations associated with a wider variety of abrading operations.
It is known that both orbital and random orbital abrading machines, which include for example, sanding, grinding, and buffing machines, may be counterbalanced in such a manner as to minimize vibrations under actual working conditions. Further, it is known to employ a counterbalancing system adapted to minimize vibration of an orbital abrading machine under predetermined operating conditions.
The present invention relates to an improved, orbital abrading machine, and more particularly to an improved random orbital buffer, which may be more readily counterbalanced to provide effective dampening of vibrations under a wider variety of actual working conditions. The present invention can include a variety of replaceable counterweight modules respectively configured for different set of operating conditions, for example, the use of different diameter buffing pads with an orbital buffer.
The present invention head portion for counterbalancing a random orbital machine includes a first element adapted for connection to a drive means for the machine and for connection to an abrasive pad assembly. The drive means is rotatable about a first axis of rotation and the abrasive pad assembly is rotatable about a second axis of rotation that is parallel to the first axis of rotation and lying within a plane common with the first axis. The head portion also includes a second element detachably connected to the first element. The first and second elements are configured to at least substantially counterbalance portions of the abrasive pad assembly not disposed concentrically of the first axis of rotation and forces to which the abrasive pad assembly is exposed during use as a result of the abrasive pad assembly engaging with a work surface.
A general object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus to facilitate the counterbalancing of an orbital abrading machine under a wide range of loaded conditions.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus having a multiplicity of readily installed counterbalancing elements, where each element is configured for a particular set of operating conditions such as size or type of abrading pad.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon a reading of the following detailed description of the invention in view of the drawings and claims.
The nature and mode of operation of the present invention will now be more fully described in the following detailed description of the invention taken with the accompanying drawing Figures in which:
At the outset, it should be appreciated that like drawing numbers on different drawing views identify substantially identical structural elements of the invention. While the present invention is described with respect to what is presently considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments.
Furthermore, it is understood that this invention is not limited to the particular methodology, materials and modifications described and as such may, of course, vary. It is also understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, which is limited only by the appended claims.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods, devices or materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, the preferred methods, devices, and materials are now described.
Reference is first made to
Preferably machine 10 is in the form of a random orbital machine in which an abrasive pad assembly 20 includes an abrasive pad 22 supported by the remainder of abrasive pad assembly 20 for free rotational movement about a second axis 24, which is disposed parallel to and orbits about first axis 18. Motor 14 may be a pneumatically driven motor connected to a suitable supply of air under pressure.
The following should be viewed in light of
Returning to
Lehman noted that the dynamic balancing technique for orbital machines, described supra, did not take into account working loads, such as drag caused by bearing engagement of the abrading or buffing pad with a surface. Lehman further noted that is was necessary to consider the angular velocity of masses associated with the buffer in order to determine the values and positions required to be assumed by balancing masses in order to achieve balance under actual working conditions.
With certain orbital machines, such as sanders, the degree of unbalance, and thus vibration experienced by an operator under typical working conditions, is normally found to be within acceptable limits. However, for other orbital machines, such as for example, buffers, the degree of unbalance is typically found to be greater and may reach a level at which prolonged use of the machine may cause serious vibration induced injury to an operator.
The following should be considered in light of
The counterweight masses mA1 and mB1, the mass and location of which have been determined as described in Lehman, are integral to head portion 130. Thus, a particular head portion 130 cannot be adapted to changing conditions, and is therefore, only effective for a particular set of operating conditions. As a result, if operating conditions are outside the conditions for which a particular head portion 130 has been configured, the head portion must be replaced with another head portion suitable for the new set of conditions. For example, switching from an 8-inch buffing pad to an 11-inch buffing pad could alter operating conditions sufficiently to create undesirable vibrational forces in an orbital machine. Unfortunately, to replace head portion 130, the head portion 130 must be disconnected from the drive shaft, which may be a burdensome task in the field.
The following should be considered in light of
One approach for obtaining the above asymmetry for mB1 is shown in
Thickness 55 of spacers 54 determines the separation between adapter 32 and counterweight 34. This separation can affect the counterbalancing effects of head portion 30. Although such affects are not described herein, it should be understood that the calculation of such effects, and the modification of head portion 30 in response to such calculations, is within the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed.
Thus, it is seen that the objects of the present invention are efficiently obtained, although modifications and changes to the invention should be readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art, which modifications are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed. It also is understood that the foregoing description is illustrative of the present invention and should not be considered as limiting. Therefore, other embodiments of the present invention are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2751725 | Champayne | Jun 1956 | A |
3205622 | Leveque | Sep 1965 | A |
3287859 | Leveque | Nov 1966 | A |
3345784 | Stelljes et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
4467565 | Wallace et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4610111 | Cox | Sep 1986 | A |
4660329 | Hutchins | Apr 1987 | A |
4729194 | Maier et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4744177 | Braun et al. | May 1988 | A |
4791694 | Itaya et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4854085 | Huber | Aug 1989 | A |
4924636 | Hoffman | May 1990 | A |
5040340 | Bischof et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5392568 | Howard, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5425666 | Frank et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5496207 | Hornung et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5823862 | Heidelberger | Oct 1998 | A |
5888128 | Lamprecht et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6007412 | Hutchins | Dec 1999 | A |
6206771 | Lehman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244933 | Morkvenas | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6413157 | Marton | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6475066 | Panagian | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485360 | Hutchins | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20020031922 | Clower et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030017795 | Walker | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032381 | Dutterer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030092369 | Marton | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3727487 | Mar 1989 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050197052 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |