The present invention relates to floatation boards, such as surf boards, paddle boards, and the like, and more particularly to a modular floatation board that may be disassembled for convenient transport and subsequently reassembled for use while maintaining a predetermined bending modulus. The bending modulus of the modular floatation board may be designed for a range from highly flexible to highly rigid. In the latter case, board rigidity may be designed to be equal or greater than typical solid one pierce board designs.
It is generally well known that currently available modular and/or inflatable boards are not rigid and flex or sink in the middle portion of the board, and hence the overall performance of such boards is generally unsatisfactory in calm waters. A rigid board is generally more desirable for use on flat water because it will track better and glide faster than a flexible board. A rigid board is also easier to balance on and less wobbly or unstable on surf and/or choppy waters. Rigid boards are generally preferred for use on lakes and the like where the water is relatively calm. On rough water and/or choppy water a rigid board may be less preferred because the board performance may feel “bumpy.”
Generally speaking, in rough water and/or waves a flexible board may provide better board performance because it may flex and absorb the impact from choppy waves as well as bend and flex to fit on a wave. On a flexible board, the natural rocker of a board changes during right/left rail to rail transitions. The rail to rail transition gives a board more rocker while facilitating turns resulting in a recoil snap and spring out of every turn, generally referred to in some circles as “flex and snap” energy. A rigid board generally makes turning in rough water more difficult, however, other factors in addition to the rocker or rocker line, such as rail shape, bottom profile, fin setup and volume size also affect board performance.
The prior art includes various modular or collapsible/foldable floatation board designs which provide for efficient transport or convenient carrying packages. The carrying package of such modular boards is generally minimized both in the overall length and the number of modular components to be transported. However, upon reassembly of such boards, generally weak regions exist that limit the load bearing capacity of the boards and/or create local regions in the boards subject to high shear stresses, and therefore flexing and/or bending at those regions may be significant.
Therefore, a need exists for a modular floatation board designed to flex a predetermined amount at a given load capacity, wherein the board's longitudinal bending moment is generally transmitted in a distributed manner from the front to rear of the board through a center module, rather than transmitting the bending moment in a concentrated localized manner, as is typically found in prior art modular boards.
A modular floatation board may include designed flexibility and/or rigidity characteristics where the longitudinal bending force of the assembled board is generally transmitted in a distributed manner from a nose module to a tail module through an intermediate module. A tensioning member may releasably couple the modules together in longitudinal alignment. A peripheral interface connection securing the intermediate module to the nose and tail modules may provide for transmittal of longitudinal bending forces over a non-localized area of the modular floatation board.
So that the manner in which the above recited features, advantages and objects of the present invention are attained can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.
It is noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Referring first to
Referring now to
The modules 112, 114 and 116 of the assembled floatation board 100 may be locked together by one or more longitudinal tensioning assemblies. For purposes of illustration, a tensioning assembly installed along the longitudinal center axis of the floatation board is shown in
Referring again to
The intermediate module 114 is effectively an independent member having a shear support structure to maintain a predetermined board rigidity. For most longitudinal cross sections of the assembled floatation board 100, the board rails 136 and 138 together with the circumferential rib 120 of the intermediate module 114 act together to counter all bending moments, both lateral and longitudinal. In this respect the floatation board 100 is generally twice as strong in bending resistance as a standard one piece non-modular board because generally double the number of vertical shear walls are provided. Furthermore, any weakness in bending resistance in the floatation board 100 at any given cross section may be controlled during manufacture of the intermediate module 114 by thickening and/or strengthening the circumferential rib 120 at any given cross section as may be required to maximize the stiffness values for the floatation board 100. For example, but not by way of limitation, strengthening of the intermediate module 114 may be accomplished when rotomolding or blow molding the intermediate module 114. The plastic solidifies after molding to form significant structure at rib 120 and/or at any desired region, such as the region where the board rails 136 and 138 meet and are discontinuous. The intermediate module 114 may generally be designed to be the strongest module of the assembled floatation board 100 because the central region of the floatation board 100 experiences the greatest bending moment. The intermediate module 114 may be designed to have bending strength that surpasses the bending strength of a standard board while having a manageable size and weight for convenient transport.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The intermediate module 314 may be provided with a circumferential rib 120 sized to be received in the grooves 118 of the nose module 312 and the tail module 316. A latch 350 may be rotatably connected to a shaft or pin 352 fixedly secured to the board rail 138 of the tail module 316. A shaft or pin 354 is similarly fixedly secured to the board rail 136 of the nose module 312. The pins 352, 354 are fixed on opposite sides of the point of abutment 315 between the nose module 312 and tail module 316. The latch 350 may be provided with an open hook or catch 356 for engagement with the pin 354 to prevent separation of the nose module 312 from the tail module 316. The primary forces acting on the latch 350 are tensile forces. Bending forces are transmitted between the nose module 312 and tail module 316 through the tongue and groove interface of the intermediate module 314 with the nose module 312 and tail module 316.
Referring now to
The modules of the assembled modular board 400 may be held together by a pair of latch fasteners anchored to the rails 411 and 419. A pair of spaced apart anchor posts 425 may be fixedly secure to the rails 411. Anchor posts 427 may be fixedly secured to the rail 419 proximate the distal ends of the nose module 412 and the tail module 416. The anchor posts 425, 427 are longitudinally aligned. A latch lever 429 pivotally connected to the anchor posts 427 may include a slot or catch 431 to engage the anchor posts 425 to hold the modules 412, 414, 416 together. Other locking configuration may be employed to prevent separation of the assembled modular board 400. For example, but not by way of limitation, the latch lever 429 may be pivotally connected to the anchor posts 425 and slot 431 latch to the anchor posts 427.
The elongated configuration of the intermediate module 414 may maximize the tongue and groove connection between the intermediate module 414 and the nose and tail modules 412, 416. and thereby provide a substantially rigid board. The tongue and groove contact area between the intermediate module and the nose and tail modules may be increased or decreased to change the degree of flexibility or rigidity of the modular floatation boards described herein.
While several embodiments of the invention has been shown and described, other embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims which follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/124,365, filed Dec. 17, 2014, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3137872 | Edwards et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3409920 | Brownley | Nov 1968 | A |
3983830 | Morgan | Oct 1976 | A |
3996868 | Schagen | Dec 1976 | A |
4928619 | Cochran | May 1990 | A |
5711692 | Pope | Jan 1998 | A |
6860221 | Henderson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7021234 | Belyeu | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7347755 | Katzfey | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7390234 | Peach | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7587986 | Neidert et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8123580 | Meyerhoffer | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8272907 | Lindstrom | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8469756 | Becker | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20060246795 | Meyerhoffer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20100326345 | Ohman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110207376 | Lindstrom | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120216389 | Becker | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130029547 | Suzuki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140273679 | Ramelot | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62124365 | Dec 2014 | US |