This invention relates to a modular floating dock and in particular to a novel steel frame and interconnection system that can be incorporated into a variety of floating docks having different decks and floats.
Typical floating docks for marinas are constructed with modules that are interconnected to provide a walkway for access to docked boats and may include a network of primary and secondary walkways connected to fingers that define separate boat slips.
While usually assembled in protected harbors to minimize wave and swell action that may damage boats docked at the floating dock, the network must be strong enough to withstand damage from occasional storms. Since a floating dock network may be assembled over a substantial area, the interconnection system is subject to wind forces as well as wave action. To accommodate the compound forces, the network must necessarily have a degree of flexibility in the interconnection of modules. In prior systems, wooden stringers fastened along the sides of deck modules would interconnect adjacent modules and provide a degree of flexibility to the overall system. Wooden stringers, however, are not structurally uniform at the time of installation and structurally degrade from the elements during use.
Rigid interconnections are subject to tremendous localized and repetitious forces and eventually fail. Therefore, an interconnection that is sturdy but allows limited stress relieving flexing is preferred.
The interconnection system for floating docks of this invention is designed for the type of modular pontoon docks typically used in marinas or in other dock environments for smaller watercraft, typically private boats and yachts. A floating dock rises and falls with the water level to provide convenient ingress and egress to the watercraft stationed at the dock. This feature makes the floating dock particularly useful in tidal environments where daily tidal changes are easily accommodated by a floating dock. In the improved interconnection system of this invention, the strength of a steel frame platform is combined with an inexpensive steel connector for interconnecting adjacent modules.
In the preferred embodiments, welding is minimized to eliminate weakened locations subject to fatigue. The preferred embodiments are designed for use with a concrete deck which can be poured during fabrication to add to the structural integrity of the finished module. These and other features of the preferred embodiments are described in greater detail in the Detached Description of the Preferred Embodiments.
Referring to
The deck assembly 14 is fabricated with a steel frame assembly 20 and, in the preferred embodiments, with a concrete deck 22. Other deck compositions may be utilized with minor modifications to the frame assembly 20. Use of concrete assists in improving the structural integrity of the finished deck assembly.
As shown in
Between the end plate members 24 on one foot centers are reinforcing rods 34 (one shown). The reinforcing rods 34 are connected to a series of clips 36 that are secured to the side members 24 as shown in the enlarged view of
To interconnect the dock modules 12 to one another, a clip assembly 50 as shown in
On the other right angle face 62 of the interconnector clip 52, a large hole 64 permits a one-inch bolt 66 to connect the clip 52 to a connector clip 68 on an adjacent module 70 as shown in part in
To accommodate stresses from wave action and other forces, the interconnection assembly includes a primary shock pad 72 of EPDM rubber or other similar material interposed between adjacent modules 12, and a pair of seating pads 74 between the bolt washers 76 for the interconnecting bolt 66 and fastening nut 78.
Since the primary interconnection is openly provided at each side by two large bolts installed on the outside of the deck assembly, the interconnection of adjacent modules becomes a relatively easy task.
As shown in the perspective view of
While, in the foregoing, embodiments of the present invention have been set forth in considerable detail for the purposes of making a complete disclosure of the invention, it may be apparent to those of skill in the art that numerous changes may be made in such detail without departing from the spirit and principles of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091203 | Usab | May 1963 | A |
4078515 | Svirklys | Mar 1978 | A |
4260293 | Peterson | Apr 1981 | A |
4352597 | Kay | Oct 1982 | A |
4940021 | Rytand | Jul 1990 | A |
5845594 | Hallsten et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070144424 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |