Traditional hardwood sport floors are labor intensive permanent installations, which are fixtures of the facilities the hardwood floors are installed in. The on-site installation of the traditional hardwood sport floors involves multiple personnel utilizing field equipment in adverse conditions. Typically, traditional hardwood floors require personnel to install a subfloor, some where the subfloor may be made of pre-engineered units, such as PowerPlay® pre-engineered units, made by Aacer Flooring® of Peshtigo, Wis. Subsequent to installing the subfloor, personnel would then install hardwood flooring. The hardwood flooring is subsequently installed by nailing or stapling individual tongue and groove boards to the previously installed subfloor. After which, personnel finish the installed floor by sanding the floor, sealing the floor (for a first time), buffing the floor, sealing the floor (for a second time), striping the floor (e.g., applying game lines, letters, borders, logos to the floor), and finally, applying two consecutive coats of finish to the floor.
Sanding of the traditional hardwood floors requires personnel to walk behind or drive sanding equipment repeatedly about the installed floor, until the appropriate smoothness is achieved. In some instances, personnel may be sanding in less than adequate conditions, such as poor lighting, poor ventilation, extreme temperatures, and/or extreme humidity, just to name a few. Additionally, the very nature of sanding an installed traditional hardwood floor produces “chatter marks,” which is a result of sanding a floor with a standard split drum sander and the shock absorption design characteristics of the subfloor (i.e., a floor installed on pre-engineered subfloor panels with resilient pads). If an installed hardwood floor has excessive “chatter marks,” then personnel would need to further sand the hardwood surface in an attempt to remove the “chatter marks.” Personnel would be required to minimize the “chatter marks” before applying a sealer to the floor installed hardwood floor. However, once created “chatter marks” are difficult remove. “Chatter marks” are but one of the many challenges associated with installing a traditional hardwood floor. For example, after sanding the traditional hardwood floor, personnel would then attempt to seal the floor for the first time. To do so, personnel would thoroughly clean the sanding debris from the floor to subsequently apply the sealer to the hardwood floor (i.e., repeatedly sweeping and vacuuming the floor). Here, the sealer to be applied may require proper ventilation of the facility in which the traditional hardwood floor is being installed. In some instances, a proper dust free, with minimal air movement, and proper ventilation of the facility is difficult to achieve, which adds to the labor required to complete the traditional hardwood floor installation, as well as adds a significant health hazard. Furthermore, once the traditional floor is installed it becomes a fixture of the building and cannot practically be removed.
Some venues use portable floors, which can be assembled and removed as needed. For example, an arena that hosts both hockey and basketball teams might use a portable floor that can be assembled on top of an ice skating surface. Installation of existing portable floors may not be as labor intensive as the on-site installation of the traditional hardwood floors. However, existing portable floors present other problems, such as poor performance and visible interconnecting seams. Because existing portable floors are designed to be easily installed in a facility, the portable floor panels have regular surfaces or edges. As a result, after the portable floor has been installed the regular surfaces or edges are noticeably visible and not aesthetically appealing. Also, existing portable floors are designed to have fewer interconnections to reduce the labor and associated equipment required to complete the portable floor installation. As a result of designing simple interconnecting portable floor panels to be installed with minimal labor and equipment, the installed traditional portable floor is not as robust as an on-site installation of a traditional hardwood floor and therefore yields a poorly performing floor.
Thus, traditional hardwood floors are labor intensive, and require extensive time and equipment to install on-site. On the other hand, portable floors may be less labor intensive, but are more expensive, perform poorly compared to a traditional floor, and are not as aesthetically pleasing as a traditional floor.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
Overview
This application describes modular floor systems that comprise multiple modular floor panels that are pre-fabricated, easily installed and not permanent. The modular floor is assembled to provide a substantially planar playing floor surface, which comprises multiple modular floor panels arranged adjacent to one another in a longitudinal dimension and a latitudinal dimension. As used herein the term “longitudinal” is used to refer to a direction parallel with a longest dimension of the modular floor panels and the term “latitudinal” is used to refer to a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction. Each of the modular floor panels has a substantially planar floor surface, that when installed proximate to each other provide the playing floor surface.
In some embodiments, a “zipper” may be used to integrate modular panels together to provide the playing floor surface, while in other embodiments, the zipper may be omitted. In the embodiments described herein, a zipper is used between two longitudinally adjacent modular floor panels to span a gap between fingers of the longitudinally adjacent floor panels, while the modular floor panels are installed immediately adjacent to each other (i.e., without a zipper) in the latitudinal direction. The zipper provides a smooth, stable transition from one modular floor panel to another in the longitudinal direction, which is not readily perceptible and is, therefore, aesthetically pleasing.
In some embodiments, the multiple modular floor panels may be coupled to each other via footings, which are coupled to and below the substantially planar floor surface. More specifically, to be coupled “to and below” the substantially planar floor surface is to be coupled to a member that defines the surface, but need not actually be coupled to the surface itself. For example, the substantially planar floor surface comprises a top surface and a bottom surface planar to the top surface, and the footings are coupled to the bottom surface, which is below the top surface. Further, each of the multiple footings has a tongue extending distally from the footing in the latitudinal direction for interconnecting with the immediately adjacent modular floor panel in the latitudinal direction. The substantially planar floor surface of the multiple modular floor panels are separated by gaps in the longitudinal direction, which are subsequently filled and integrated with zippers.
The modular floor panels may be pre-fabricated in a manufacturing facility and delivered to a site ready to be installed with minimal labor and field equipment. The zippers may be either a pre-fabricated kit or a pre-assembled “drop-in” unit. In either configuration (i.e., as a kit, or as a drop-in unit), the zippers are configured for quickly and easily integrating the modular floor panels installed in the longitudinal direction without producing readily apparent seams.
The substantially planar floor surface of the modular floor panels may be made of a variety of materials. In the embodiments described herein, the substantially planar floor surface is made of tongue and groove maple boards about 25/32 inches thick, and 2 and ½ inches wide, which may be random-length strips or finger-joint strip.
Random-length strip comprise individual pieces of flooring, typically 1 and ½ inch, 2 and ¼ inch, 2 and ½ inch, or 3 and ¼ inch widths, in lengths between 9 inches and 8 feet are available. The most common thickness specified is 25/32 inch, but other thicknesses are also available, such as 33/32 inch and ½ inch. This surface material is installed like a horizontal brick wall, with each piece being overlapped with adjacent pieces and fastened into the subfloor with cleats, staples or steel clips, depending on the subfloor chosen for the project. The Maple Flooring Manufactures Association, Inc. (MFMA) subfloor configurations are compatible with MFMA random-length strip flooring.
Finger-jointed strip comprise a number of random-length strip segments joined together at the manufacturing plant to form a consistent length board, typically 2 and ¼ inches wide. The most common thickness specified is 25/32 of an inch, but other thicknesses are also available, such as 33/32 inches and ½ inch thick finger-jointed strip flooring is also available. This finger-jointed material is also installed like a horizontal brick wall, with each consistent-length board being overlapped with adjacent boards and fastened into the subfloor with cleats, staples or steel clips, depending on the subfloor chosen for the project. Most MFMA subfloor configurations are compatible with MFMA finger-jointed strip flooring.
The modular floor panel length is approximately twenty feet long. However, the tongue and groove boards may be any other desired dimensions. For example, in one embodiment, tongue and groove maple boards of about ¾ inch thick, 2 inches wide, and random lengths totaling twenty feet long may be used. Further, other types of woods may also be used, such as cherry, red oak, white oak hickory, beech, walnut, or any other wood suitable for use as a floor surface. Still further, other materials may also be used to make the substantially planar floor surface. For example, engineered wood, such as, products available from Huber Engineered Woods™ of Charlotte, N.C., plastic, ceramic, rock, metal, fiberglass, laminates, composites, plywood, oriented strand board, dimensional lumber, recycled composites combinations of the forgoing, or the like may be used to make the substantially planar floor surface. In one specific alternative embodiment, the modular floor panels may be made of engineered woods, as discussed above, with a laminate disposed on the substantially planar floor surface that is aesthetically pleasing (e.g., a wood veneer).
The modular floor as described herein, provides for a modular floor that is readily installed with less labor and less cost, while maintaining superior performance and being aesthetically pleasing. Further, as a product of the modular floor's modularity, the modular floors may be considered a furnishing, rather than a fixture of facilities the modular floors are installed in. Thus, the modular floor may be removed from one facility and reinstalled in another facility. Further, the modular floor is sustainable, as it is reusable instead of being torn out and disposed of. Moreover, because the modular floor may be considered a furnishing rather than a fixture, it need not be included within the original building permit for a structure, further reducing the cost of installing the modular floor. Additionally, as a furnishing, the modular floor may be depreciated over a much shorter time than if it were a fixture.
Illustrative Modular Floor Panel
In
Illustrative Footing
Deck 210 is illustrated in
Further,
Damping mechanisms 322A-322N are illustrated in
While footing 302 is illustrated in
Furthermore, while
As discussed above, and as illustrated in
Illustrative Zipper
Exemplary Method of Making and Installing a Modular Floor
Process 800 includes an operation 802, which represents fixing a portion of a substantially planar floor surface 104 to multiple pre-assembled footings 106A-106N, defining a modular floor panel 102. Here, as discussed above, substantially planar floor surface 104 comprises a rugged and hard material (e.g., tongue and groove maple boards). Next, process 800 proceeds to operation 804, which represents forming a zipper 604 (e.g., by cutting boards 612 and 614 to appropriate lengths and pre-assembling boards into assemblies 616). Operation 804 may be performed by a jig configured to cut a substantially planar floor surface 104 to the desired shape. Operation 804 is followed by operation 806, which represents sanding multiple modular floor panels and multiple zippers. Here, the sanding may be performed by using a table top multiple drum sander to achieve a desired finish without the chatter marks common in traditional wood floors that are sanded after installation. Following the sanding of multiple modular floor panels and multiple zippers, process 800 continues with operation 808, which represents applying a sealer to the substantially planar floor surfaces of the multiple modular floor panels and the multiple zippers. At operation 810, hot air may be applied to the sealer disposed on the planar surfaces of the multiple modular floor panels and the multiple zippers to speed the drying process and increase production speeds.
At operation 812, the multiple modular floor panels and the multiple zippers are delivered to a facility (e.g., an indoor basketball court). Process 800 continues at operation 814, where the multiple modular floor panels are installed adjacent to each other in the longitudinal and latitudinal directions. Once installed, there will be gaps in the substantially planar floor surface between adjacent modular floor panels in the longitudinal direction. Next, at operation 816, the multiple modular floor panels installed in the longitudinal direction are integrated by installing the zippers in the gaps to span the distance between longitudinally adjacent modular floor panels. At this point, the modular floor is completely installed and may be buffed, a second coat of sealer applied, painted to add any desired striping or graphics, maroon padded, and two coats of finish applied. After a three inch by four inch vented cove base is applied to the walls around a perimeter the modular floor will be ready to use.
Although embodiments have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as illustrative forms of implementing the embodiments. For example, in various embodiments, any of the structural features and/or methodological acts described herein may be rearranged, modified, or omitted entirely.
This is a continuation application which claims priority to commonly assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/717,903, entitled “Modular Floor System,” filed on Mar. 4, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein for all that it teaches and discloses.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1045219 | Tramill et al. | Nov 1912 | A |
1407679 | Ruthrauff | Feb 1922 | A |
1660480 | Daniels | Feb 1928 | A |
1778352 | Bruce | Oct 1930 | A |
1925070 | Livezey | Aug 1933 | A |
2027292 | Rockwell | Jan 1936 | A |
2652753 | Smith | Sep 1953 | A |
2819026 | Leyendecker | Jan 1958 | A |
3387422 | Wanzer | Jun 1968 | A |
3515620 | McPherson | Jun 1970 | A |
4289420 | Davis et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4443989 | Silvey et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4462712 | Penland, Sr. | Jul 1984 | A |
4538392 | Hamar et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4600336 | Waller, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4759164 | Abendroth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4860516 | Koller et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4930280 | Abendroth | Jun 1990 | A |
5020286 | Hamar et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5179812 | Hill | Jan 1993 | A |
5313756 | Ways et al. | May 1994 | A |
5497590 | Counihan | Mar 1996 | A |
5647183 | Counihan | Jul 1997 | A |
5755068 | Ormiston | May 1998 | A |
5822944 | Penland, Sr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5987839 | Hamar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6055785 | Counihan | May 2000 | A |
6115981 | Counihan | Sep 2000 | A |
6367217 | Niese et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6474905 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6557314 | Shelton | May 2003 | B2 |
7886497 | Pervan | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020178675 | Valentine | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030172608 | Chambers | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200713 | McStay | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20080295433 | Eyal et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090193747 | Chorney et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110214377 | Tucker, Jr. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0455616 | Nov 1991 | EP |
Entry |
---|
“Action Hardwood Floors Inc.”, retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010 at <<http://actionhardwoodflooring.com/>>, 2 pages. |
Connor Alliance, Section 09642—Wood Gymnasium Flooring, Nov. 26, 2007, Alliance 005, Master Rev D, pp. 1-4. |
“Connor Sports Flooring—A complete line of maple hardood courts and synthetic athleti . . .”. retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010, at <<http://www.connorfloor.com/>>, 1 page. |
Connor Sports Flooring, Alliance Fixed Resilient, retrieved on Mar. 11, 2010 at <<http://www.connorfloor.com/downloads/connor/sales—sheets/alliance.pdf>>, 1 page. |
Homer Balanced Performance (BPS) System, Section 096466—Wood Gymnasium Flooring, Nov. 1, 2009, 5 pages. |
“Homer Sports Flooring—the Leader in Sports Flooring, since 1891”, retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010, at <<httpL//www.hornerflooring.com/>>, 1 page. |
Homer, Balanced Performance System—BPS—retrieved on Mar. 10, 2010 at <<http://www.hornerflooring.com/pdfs—brochures/bro—bps.pdf>>, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,903, mailed on Oct. 26, 2011, Donald Tucker, “Modular Floor System ”. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,903, mailed on Jun. 21, 2012, Donald Tucker, “Modular Floor System ”, 10 pages. |
The PCT Search Report mailed Nov. 23, 2011 for PCT application No. PCT/US11/27008, 9 pages. |
Robbins Floor: Mach 1#top, retrieved on Mar. 10, 2010 from <<http://www.robbinsfloor.com/mach1.html#top, 4 pages. |
Robbins Floor: Sportplay, retrieved on Mar. 8, 2010 at <<http://www.robbinsfloor.com/sportplay.html>>, 3 pages. |
“Robbins Sports Surfaces”, retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010 at <<http://www.robbinsfloor.com/homepage.html>>, 1 page. |
W-D Flooring Athletic Systems, Anchored Elite System, retrieved on Mar. 11, 2010 at <<http://www.wdflooring.com/athletic/extraImages/WD—SpecElite.pdf>>, 2 pages. |
“WD Flooring”, retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010, at <<http://wdflooring.com/>>, 1 page. |
WD Flooring Anchored Elite System, retrieved on Mar. 10, 2010 at <<http://www.wdflooring.com/athletic/sys1elite.htm>>, 1 page. |
“Welcome to Champion Hardwood Floors ˜ A Leading California Flooring Contractor off . . .”, retrieved on Mar. 3, 2010, at <<http://championhardwoodfloors.net/>>, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130061547 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12717903 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13674807 | US |