Modular hearing device receiver suspension

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6459800
  • Patent Number
    6,459,800
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 11, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device comprises a housing that defines a chamber. The housing is adapted to be inserted into a hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with a proximal end of the housing. An isolation membrane at least partially surrounds the hearing device receiver such that, upon inserting the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber, thus preventing the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation membrane is formed from a stretched polymer material such as polyurethane or silicone and forms a series of pleats when engaged with the receiver. Alternately, the receiver suspension includes an isolation spring having two grasping members interconnected with a flexure member.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention pertains to hearing aids. More particularly, the present invention pertains to suspension devices for hearing aid receivers.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The modem trend in the design and implementation of hearing devices is focusing to a large extent on reducing the physical size of the hearing device. Miniaturization of hearing device components is becoming increasingly feasible with rapid technological advances in the fields of power supplies, sound processing electronics and micro-mechanics. The demand for smaller and less conspicuous hearing devices continues to increase as a larger portion of our population ages and faces hearing loss. Those who face hearing loss also encounter the accompanying desire to avoid the stigma and self consciousness associated with this condition. As a result, smaller hearing devices, which are cosmetically less visible, but more sophisticated, are increasingly sought after.




Hearing device technology has progressed rapidly in recent years. First generation hearing devices were primarily of the Behind-The-Ear (BTE) type, where an externally mounted device was connected by an acoustic tube to a molded shell placed within the ear. With the advancement of component miniaturization, modern hearing devices rarely use this Behind-The-Ear technique, focusing primarily on one of several forms of an In-The-Canal hearing device. Three main types of In-The-Canal hearing devices are routinely offered by audiologists and physicians. In-The-Ear (ITE) devices rest primarily in the concha of the ear and have the disadvantages of being fairly conspicuous to a bystander and relatively bulky and uncomfortable to wear. Smaller In-The-Canal (ITC) devices fit partially in the concha and partially in the ear canal and are less visible, but still leave a substantial portion of the hearing device exposed. Recently, Completely-In-The-Canal (CIC) hearing devices have come into greater use. As the name implicates, these devices fit deep within the ear canal and are essentially hidden from view from the outside.




In addition to the obvious cosmetic advantages these types of in-the-canal devices provide, they also have several performance advantages that larger, externally mounted devices do not offer. Placing the hearing device deep within the ear canal and close to the tympanic membrane (ear drum) improves the frequency response of the device, reduces distortion due to jaw extrusion, reduces the occurrence of occlusion effects and improves overall sound fidelity. Earlier generation hearing devices function primarily by sound amplification and are typically not altered to a user's particular hearing impairment. Modern electronics allow specific sound processing schemes to be incorporated into the hearing device. Similarly, custom programming can be incorporated into the hearing device circuitry allowing a truly custom device for any particular user.




While the performance of CIC hearing devices are generally superior to other larger and less sophisticated devices, several problems remain. Complications typically arise due to the small size of CIC hearing devices and the depth that they are inserted into a user's ear canal. Additionally, the small size of the device, combined with increasingly complex electronics present other performance problems such as increased sensitivity to vibrations, more delicate components because of their small size, and the accompanying possibility of device failure.




The quality of the microphone system that receives sound waves is also critical to the performance of the hearing device. In general, hearing aids are configured with a microphone and a receiver (speaker) connected by an electronic circuit. The microphone picks up vibrational energy, i.e. sound waves, from the air or from the physical connection to the hearing aid. The physical connections can include the points where the hearing device shell and conducting wires join the receiver. A hearing device microphone transduces the sound waves into an electrical signal. The receiver (or speaker) then transduces the amplified electrical signal from the microphone and from any type of programming circuitry into vibrational energy which is then heard by a user. When driven by an electronic signal, the receiver itself will vibrate. Vibrations are also generated from within a user's own skull. If the receiver is in contact with another hearing device component, these vibrations will be transferred from the receiver to the component, and from the component to the microphone. This often causes unwanted feedback. Typically this contact with other components occurs at the receiver port area, where the amplified sound exits the hearing device. This unwanted contact can also occur between a receiver wall and the hearing aid shell.




A known approach in larger hearing devices is to try and suspend the receiver away from the hearing device shell. However, in smaller hearing aids it is difficult to do this reliably. Receivers are typically suspended by means of two functional elements, the first being a piece of tubing connected to a port on the end of the receiver, and the second being an elastomeric sleeve about the body of the receiver can. The tubing and the sleeve can be configured as two components or integrated into a single piece suspension. In the single piece version, the tubing is molded as a unit with the sleeve about the receiver body. Non-woven fabric tapes are also commonly used to isolate the receiver from the shell wall.




Additionally, known receiver suspensions are typically made from a low durometer rubber such a silicone and neoprene. These devices are often molded with small bumps or flanges that help to reduce the contact area between the suspension and a shell wall. However, these molded suspensions present problems. First, since the hearing aid shell on custom hearing aids vary greatly from device to device, this often defeats the effectiveness of the small flanged features on the molded tips. This is due to contact between the shell and the receiver along larger surface areas or due to wedging the rubber suspensions too tightly along a shell wall.




Second, the elastomeric suspensions are generally glued into place in the hearing aid shell, or the receiver port. This glue can wick along the materials and harden the otherwise compliant materials, thus defeating the purpose of utilizing a receiver suspension. Also the molded suspensions are relatively large due to limitations in molding technology, the wire coming from the receiver can interfere with the suspension, and the wire attached to the receiver can contact the receiver and shell in uncontrolled ways thereby further contributing to feedback problems. Furthermore, lower durometer suspension tubes are delicate and susceptible to failure due to mechanical ingress caused by cleaning and probing, providing a direct ingress path for cerumen and other contaminates. Finally, silicone suspension tubes are very difficult to glue and attach because silicone compatible adhesives are generally slow to cure.




What is needed is a simple way of suspending the receiver away from the wall of the hearing aid shell without the addition of a large suspension apparatus. What is also needed is a receiver suspension that allows quick and simple installation and is essentially universal for a wide range of hearing devices.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device shell comprises a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end. The housing is adapted to be inserted into the hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing. An isolation membrane at least partially surrounds the hearing device receiver such that, upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber. The isolation membrane prevents the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation membrane is formed from a stretched polymer material such as polyurethane or silicone and forms a series of pleats when engaged with the receiver.




In an alternate embodiment, a receiver suspension comprises a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end. The housing is adapted to be inserted into a hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing. An isolation spring is adapted to engage the hearing device receiver such that upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation spring suspends the receiver within the housing chamber. The isolation membrane prevents the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation spring comprises first and second grasping members and a flexure member intermediate to and connected with the first and second grasping members. The flexure member preferably includes a pair of spring biased portions that maintain the receiver at a specified distance from the inside surface of the receiver housing. The receiver suspension can alternately be formed from a multi-layered laminate material that provides frequency response dampening.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The drawings illustrate both the design and utility of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, in which similar elements in different embodiments are referred to by the same reference numbers for purposes of ease in illustration of the invention, wherein:





FIG. 1

is an exploded perspective view of a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a partially assembled view of the receiver suspension of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a longitudinal cross sectional view of an assembled receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a longitudinal cross sectional view of an alternate embodiment of an assembled receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of a receiver suspension isolation member constructed in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 6

is an alternate embodiment of a receiver suspension isolation member constructed in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a first embodiment showing a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention mounted within a hearing device shell; and





FIG. 8

is a second embodiment showing a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention mounted within a hearing device shell.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIGS. 1-3

show a hearing device receiver suspension


50


constructed in accordance with the present invention. In the embodiment of

FIGS. 1-3

, the receiver suspension


50


has a rigid housing


60


that includes an open proximal end


61


and a distal end


63


. The housing


60


includes a sound port


68


extending from the distal end


63


. Preferably, the housing


60


is cylindrically shaped and has an inside surface


64


that defines a chamber


70


, and an outside surface


66


. The housing


60


is preferably formed from a strong metal that allows a thin wall construction without sacrificing strength or rigidity. Such a construction allows the thickness of a wall


62


of the housing to be minimized. Particularly in CIC hearing devices, it is often critical to try and minimize the size of the hearing device components.




When fully assembled (best seen in FIG.


3


), the proximal end


61


of the housing


60


is closed by an end cap


80


. The end cap


80


is adapted to securely engage with the proximal end


61


of the housing


60


. The end cap


80


has a proximal surface


82


that includes an aperture


88


. When the end cap


80


is engaged with the housing


60


, the aperture


88


provides access to the chamber


70


. Preferably, the end cap


80


forms a sleeved interference fit with the proximal end


61


of the housing


60


so that it will independently remain in place. A glue, or other type of bio-compatible sealant


86


may also be used to more permanently attach the end cap


80


to the housing


60


. The sealant


86


may also be used to seal the chamber


70


from the outside environment in order to prevent contaminates such as water, oil, or debris from entering the chamber


70


.




An isolation membrane


120


at least partially surrounds a hearing device receiver


100


. Preferably, the isolation membrane


120


is formed from a stretched polymer that forms a series of pleats


122


and


124


when it is stretched around the receiver


100


. The assembled receiver


100


and isolation membrane


120


are inserted into the chamber


70


defined by the housing


60


. The series of pleats


122


and


124


run substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the isolation membrane and allow the receiver


100


to be suspended within the chamber


70


. The pleats


122


and


124


require only a small contact area between the isolation membrane


120


and the inside surface


64


of the housing


60


in order to suspend the receiver


100


within the housing


60


. When surrounded by the isolation membrane


120


, the receiver


100


itself does not directly contact the inside surface


64


of the housing


60


.





FIGS. 1 and 3

show the isolation membrane


120


with the pleats


122


folding away from the central opening in the isolation membrane


120


. At rest, the isolation membrane


120


is a flat planar object with a central opening that can be formed by cutting two slits that form an X through the center of the isolation membrane


120


. The slits form pleats


122


(or


124


) that lie parallel to the opening when the isolation membrane


120


is at rest. But as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 3

, the pleats fold away from the opening when a receiver


100


is inserted through the opening in the isolation membrane


120


.




While

FIGS. 1-3

show a series of two pleats


122


and


124


formed by the isolation membrane


120


, it is contemplated that there may be a fewer or a greater number of these pleats depending on the precise material chosen to form the isolation membrane


120


, the configuration of the isolation membrane, and the degree to which the isolation membrane is stretched around the receiver


100


. A larger number of pleats necessarily means that a larger contact area is maintained between the isolation membrane


120


and the inside surface


64


of the housing


60


but may result in a more stable suspension system.




Since the isolation membrane


120


is preferably formed from a polymeric membrane material such as polyurethane or silicone, its thickness can be reduced to between 0.001 and 0.003 inches. This is a significantly reduced thickness as opposed to the use of known molded rubber suspensions which have a wall thickness between 0.007 and 0.010 inches. Known rubber molding processes do not permit the small thicknesses that can be achieved with the use of a membrane type material. Since reducing the size of the individual hearing device components is crucial in the design and production of CIC hearing devices, reducing the size of the isolation membrane


120


allows the housing


60


and the entire hearing device to be smaller as well.




The sound port


68


that extends from the distal end of the housing


60


aligns with a speaker


101


that is incorporated into the receiver


100


. Known hearing device receivers that incorporate a sound port directly onto the receiver require that the sound port directly engage with an aperture on the hearing device shell. This direct contact between the receiver and the hearing device shell can compound the undesired effects of vibrational feedback. A receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention incorporates the sound port


68


onto the housing


60


, thereby eliminating the need to incorporate the sound port directly on the receiver. This results in fewer of the receiver components being in direct contact with the housing


60


and therefore a hearing device shell, aiding in the overall reduction of vibrational feedback.




The sound port


68


located on the distal end of the receiver housing


60


funnels the acoustic energy produced by the receiver


60


and directs it toward a user's inner ear and eventually the tympanic membrane (ear drum). Rather than a portion of the receiver itself being inserted through an aperture on a hearing device shell, the sound port


68


on the housing


60


can instead be inserted through the same aperture. This further isolates the receiver


60


from the other portions of the hearing device, the only contact between these elements being the portions of the isolation membrane pleats


122


and


124


that suspend the receiver


100


within the chamber


70


.




Prior to inserting the receiver


100


into a hearing device shell, the receiver


100


is pre-suspended within the receiver housing


60


and the entire assembly can be inserted as a module into the hearing device shell. The size of the housing


60


can therefore be standardized for use in a variety of hearing device shells because the isolation membrane can account for any extra space between the housing


60


and the receiver


100


. Various receivers


100


can also be utilized with a single sized housing


60


by providing differently sized isolation membranes


120


.




The receiver


100


also includes contact pads


104


on its distal end that enable wires


106


to be connected to the receiver


100


. The wires


106


are then threaded through the aperture


88


formed through the end cap


80


, and are routed to the various electronics located within the hearing device. For example, the wires may lead to an integrated sound processing circuit. Any gaps left between the aperture


88


and the wires


106


are filled with a sealant


90


to ensure that the receiver continues to be protected from dirt, moisture and other contaminates and to prevent sound leakage.





FIG. 4

shows a further preferred embodiment of a hearing device receiver suspension


150


constructed in accordance with the present invention. The receiver suspension


150


has a rigid housing


160


that has an open proximal end


161


and a distal end


163


. The housing


160


also includes a sound port


168


extending from the distal end


163


. Preferably, the housing


160


is cylindrically shaped with an inside surface


164


that defines a chamber


170


, and an outside surface


166


. The housing


160


is formed from a strong metal that allows a thin wall construction without sacrificing strength or rigidity. The utilization of such a material for the housing


160


allows the thickness of a wall


162


to be minimized. Particularly in CIC devices, it is critical to minimize the size of the various components.




When fully assembled, the proximal end


161


of the housing


160


is closed by an end cap


180


. The end cap


180


is adapted to securely engage with the proximal end


161


of the housing


160


. The end cap


180


has a proximal surface


182


that includes an aperture


188


. When the end cap


180


is engaged with the housing


160


, the aperture


188


extends through the proximal surface


182


of the end cap


180


and into the chamber


170


. Preferably, the end cap


180


forms a sleeved interference fit with the proximal end


161


of the housing


160


so that it will independently remain in place. A glue, or other type of bio-compatible sealant


186


may also be used to more permanently attach the end cap


180


to the housing


160


. The sealant


186


may also be used to seal the chamber


170


from the outside environment in order to prevent contaminates such as water, oil, or debris from entering the chamber


170


. A receiver


200


includes contact pads


204


on its distal end that enable wires


206


to be connected to the receiver


200


. The wires


206


are then threaded through the aperture


188


formed through the end cap


180


and are routed to the various electronics located within the hearing device. For example, the wires may lead to an integrated sound processing circuit. Any gaps left between the aperture


188


and the wires


206


are filled with a sealant


190


to ensure that the receiver continues to be protected from dirt, moisture and other contaminates.




A pair of isolation springs


220


are inserted between the receiver


200


and the inside wall


164


of the housing


160


. The isolation springs


220


suspend the receiver


200


within the chamber


170


so that only a minimum amount of contact is maintained between the isolation springs


220


and the inside wall


164


of the housing. No part of the receiver


200


directly contacts the inside wall


164


of the housing


160


.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, the isolation springs


220


are shown in greater detail. Each of the isolation springs


220


includes a first grasping member


222


, a second grasping member


224


, and a flexure member


227


. The flexure member


227


is disposed in between the first and second grasping members


222


and


224


with each of the grasping members


222


and


224


being offset from the flexure member


227


by a substantially equal distance. Each of the two grasping members


222


and


224


and the flexure member


227


are aligned substantially parallel to each other and are connected by a pair of cross members


236


and


238


. Each of the grasping members


222


and


224


are substantially flat and lie in a substantially common plane. Each of the grasping members


222


and


224


has a first end and a second end, each of the ends including a flange


226


extending from the surface of the respective grasping member. Each of the flanges


226


extend away from the surface of the grasping members in a common direction.




The flexure member


227


includes a first spring biased portion


232


and a second spring biased portion


234


. The flexure member


227


, and more specifically the two spring biased portions


232


and


234


enable the isolation springs


220


to suspend a receiver within a receiver housing, while also securing the receiver in place. As shown in

FIG. 4

, each isolation spring


220


is attached to the receiver


200


with the flanges


226


directed toward the receiver


200


. The length of the grasping members


222


and


224


are such that the flanges


226


extend over the proximal and distal edges of the receiver and therefore hold the receiver


200


in place. The lengths of the grasping members


222


and


224


are substantially parallel to the receiver


200


. The flexure member


227


is biased in a direction opposite to the direction that the flanges


226


extend. As best illustrated in

FIG. 4

, when a receiver


200


is inserted into a housing


160


with the pair of isolation springs


220


attached to it, the flexure members


227


exert a force on the inside surface


164


of the housing


160


. The force exerted by the flexure members simultaneously cause each of the grasping members


222


and


224


to exert an opposite force against a top surface


202


and a bottom surface


208


of the receiver


200


. The isolation springs


220


, thereby suspend the receiver


200


within the chamber


170


defined by the housing


160


.




Each of the flexure members


227


have a pair of contact surfaces


228


and


230


located at each of the opposite extremities of the flexure member


227


. The contact surfaces


228


and


230


are the only portions of the flexure member


227


and of the entire isolation spring


220


that maintains contact with the inside surface


164


of the housing


160


when the receiver


200


and the isolation spring


220


are engaged and inserted into the housing


160


.




The isolation spring


220


is preferably made from a thin easily controlled material such as a metal alloy or a thin formed polymer film. The material can also be formed by a chemical etching, electroforming, laser cutting, plasma etching, plasma deposition or other suitable means. The spring biasing of the suspension member, and more specifically the flexure member


227


, interfaces with the housing


160


and the receiver


200


in a controlled and tuned manner that is capable of being adapted to the specific frequency range of the hearing device being used. The thickness, material properties, and geometry of the flexure member


227


is preferably selected to best isolate the receiver, in light of the frequency range of the hearing device, the mass of the receiver


200


, and the mass of the hearing device (i.e. the shell structure and associated conformal tip). Preferably, the isolation member will have a low resonant frequency so that the higher frequency components are isolated and will not conduct vibrational energy back to the microphone.





FIG. 6

shows an alternate embodiment of an isolation spring


320


. The isolation spring


320


utilizes a controlled flexure suspension similar to the isolation spring


220


described in conjunction with

FIG. 5

, while additionally employing a multi-layer laminated structure. The isolation spring


320


includes the same geometric components as the isolation spring


220


, namely, a pair of grasping members


322


and


324


and a single flexure member


327


. The orientation of the flexure member in relation to the grasping members is similar to that of the isolation spring


220


of FIG.


5


. The isolation spring


320


also includes flanges


326


located on each of the ends of the grasping members


322


and


324


. A second isolation spring layer


320


-


a


is bonded to the main layer to form the multi-layer structure. Further layers may be utilized in order to achieve a flexure with specific frequency response characteristics.




The laminate multi-layer structure of

FIG. 6

is specifically designed to maintain the low frequency suspension and to additionally add a constrained or viscous type construction in order to dampen and absorb energy stored in the isolation spring, and more specifically, the flexure members. The laminated multi-layer structure can be fabricated as a thin metal sheet coated on one or both sides by a polymer layer. Preferably, the polymer layer has a viscous or lossy nature, and acts to absorb energy. The polymer layers can be coated in place, as is commonly done using conformal coatings on printed circuit boards. Materials that would have vibration dissipation properties of varying degrees include, but are not limited to: silicones, polyurethanes, epoxies, and acrylic materials. Alternately, the base structure of the flexure member can be laminated prior to forming using a mylar material. The polymer can be heat laminated with a bondable material such as a urethane film or the dampening layer can be applied by vapor deposition or another type of tin film deposition process.





FIGS. 7 and 8

show two alternate embodiments of a receiver suspension and more specifically, the mounting schemes for attaching the receiver suspension to a hearing device shell.

FIG. 7

shows a receiver housing


150


as described in conjunction with FIG.


4


. The receiver housing


150


is shown as it would engage within a hearing device shell


400


. The hearing device shell


400


includes an aperture


412


on its distal end, and an extension tube


410


that extends through the aperture


412


and into a chamber


414


defined by the hearing device shell


400


. The sound port


168


on the distal end of the receiver housing is adapted to engage with the extension tube


410


. Sound that is created by the receiver will thus be directed out of the sound port


168


through the extension tube


410


and out of the aperture


412


. The aperture


412


is aligned on the distal end of the hearing device shell


400


so that when the hearing device is inserted into a user's ear canal, the aperture will align with and direct the sound waves generated by the hearing device directly toward the tympanic membrane (ear drum). The extension tube also helps to suspend the receiver suspension


150


, and thus the receiver


200


, within the chamber


414


, providing further isolation to the receiver. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/467,102, filed on Dec. 10, 1999, describes a preferred embodiment of a receiver suspension that utilizes a grommet to suspend the receiver within the hearing device shell, the details of which are hereby incorporated into the present application by reference.





FIG. 8

shows the receiver suspension


150


including an integrated extended sound port


170


. The hearing device shell


400


includes an aperture


414


through which the extended sound port


170


can engage. The embodiment of

FIG. 8

eliminates the need for the additional extension tube


410


described in conjunction with FIG.


7


. The extended sound port


170


engaged within the aperture


414


suspends the receiver housing


150


within the chamber


414


thus providing further isolation to the receiver housing


150


and thus the receiver


200


.




Although the invention has been described and illustrated in the above description and drawings, it is understood that this description is by example only and that numerous changes and modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted, except by the following claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device shell, comprising:a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end; a cover adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing; and an isolation membrane, the isolation membrane at least partially surrounding the hearing device receiver such that, upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber and prevents contact between the receiver and the housing inside surface, wherein the isolation membrane has a first side, a second side, an opening through its center that is sized to stretch over substantially the entire receiver, and at least one pleat lying parallel with the opening, said pleat folding away from the opening when the receiver is inserted through the opening.
  • 2. The receiver suspension of claim 1, further comprising a sound port on the distal end of the housing.
  • 3. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the cover substantially seals the open proximal end of the housing when engaged therewith.
  • 4. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the cover includes an aperture extending therethrough, wherein the aperture provides access to the housing chamber when the cover is engaged with the housing.
  • 5. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the isolation membrane is formed from polyurethane or silicon.
  • 6. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the isolation membrane maintains a minimum amount of contact with the housing inside surface.
US Referenced Citations (41)
Number Name Date Kind
2678645 Raimo May 1954 A
3665122 Weiss May 1972 A
3783201 Weiss Jan 1974 A
4375016 Harada Feb 1983 A
4440982 Kaanders Apr 1984 A
4553627 Gastmeier et al. Nov 1985 A
4567881 Heller Feb 1986 A
4569812 Werwath et al. Feb 1986 A
4617429 Bellfiore Oct 1986 A
4756312 Epley Jul 1988 A
4852177 Ambrose Jul 1989 A
4854415 Goshke Aug 1989 A
4869339 Barton Sep 1989 A
4870688 Voroba Sep 1989 A
4879750 Nassler Nov 1989 A
4880076 Ahlberg et al. Nov 1989 A
4937876 Biërmans Jun 1990 A
5002151 Oliveira et al. Mar 1991 A
5031219 Ward et al. Jul 1991 A
5084224 Watters Jan 1992 A
5099947 Guggenberger et al. Mar 1992 A
5105904 Olsen Apr 1992 A
5166659 Navarro Nov 1992 A
5201007 Ward et al. Apr 1993 A
5203352 Gardner, Jr. Apr 1993 A
5293008 Danielsen Mar 1994 A
5327500 Campbell Jul 1994 A
5395168 Leenen Mar 1995 A
5401920 Oliveira Mar 1995 A
5440082 Claes Aug 1995 A
5654530 Sauer et al. Aug 1997 A
5682020 Oliveira Oct 1997 A
5701348 Shennib et al. Dec 1997 A
5748743 Weeks May 1998 A
5825896 Leedom Oct 1998 A
5881159 Aceti et al. Mar 1999 A
5887070 Iseberg Mar 1999 A
5920636 Oliveira et al. Jul 1999 A
5979589 Aceti Nov 1999 A
5996584 Oliveira et al. Dec 1999 A
6179085 Brimhall Jan 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
43 39 899 Jun 1995 DE
0 367 855 May 1990 EP
WO 9913686 Mar 1999 WO