Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6459800
-
Patent Number
6,459,800
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, July 11, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, October 1, 200222 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Kuntz; Curtis
- Harvey; Dionne
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 381 322
- 381 324
- 381 328
- 381 329
- 381 304
- 381 305
- 181 171
- 181 172
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device comprises a housing that defines a chamber. The housing is adapted to be inserted into a hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with a proximal end of the housing. An isolation membrane at least partially surrounds the hearing device receiver such that, upon inserting the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber, thus preventing the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation membrane is formed from a stretched polymer material such as polyurethane or silicone and forms a series of pleats when engaged with the receiver. Alternately, the receiver suspension includes an isolation spring having two grasping members interconnected with a flexure member.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to hearing aids. More particularly, the present invention pertains to suspension devices for hearing aid receivers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The modem trend in the design and implementation of hearing devices is focusing to a large extent on reducing the physical size of the hearing device. Miniaturization of hearing device components is becoming increasingly feasible with rapid technological advances in the fields of power supplies, sound processing electronics and micro-mechanics. The demand for smaller and less conspicuous hearing devices continues to increase as a larger portion of our population ages and faces hearing loss. Those who face hearing loss also encounter the accompanying desire to avoid the stigma and self consciousness associated with this condition. As a result, smaller hearing devices, which are cosmetically less visible, but more sophisticated, are increasingly sought after.
Hearing device technology has progressed rapidly in recent years. First generation hearing devices were primarily of the Behind-The-Ear (BTE) type, where an externally mounted device was connected by an acoustic tube to a molded shell placed within the ear. With the advancement of component miniaturization, modern hearing devices rarely use this Behind-The-Ear technique, focusing primarily on one of several forms of an In-The-Canal hearing device. Three main types of In-The-Canal hearing devices are routinely offered by audiologists and physicians. In-The-Ear (ITE) devices rest primarily in the concha of the ear and have the disadvantages of being fairly conspicuous to a bystander and relatively bulky and uncomfortable to wear. Smaller In-The-Canal (ITC) devices fit partially in the concha and partially in the ear canal and are less visible, but still leave a substantial portion of the hearing device exposed. Recently, Completely-In-The-Canal (CIC) hearing devices have come into greater use. As the name implicates, these devices fit deep within the ear canal and are essentially hidden from view from the outside.
In addition to the obvious cosmetic advantages these types of in-the-canal devices provide, they also have several performance advantages that larger, externally mounted devices do not offer. Placing the hearing device deep within the ear canal and close to the tympanic membrane (ear drum) improves the frequency response of the device, reduces distortion due to jaw extrusion, reduces the occurrence of occlusion effects and improves overall sound fidelity. Earlier generation hearing devices function primarily by sound amplification and are typically not altered to a user's particular hearing impairment. Modern electronics allow specific sound processing schemes to be incorporated into the hearing device. Similarly, custom programming can be incorporated into the hearing device circuitry allowing a truly custom device for any particular user.
While the performance of CIC hearing devices are generally superior to other larger and less sophisticated devices, several problems remain. Complications typically arise due to the small size of CIC hearing devices and the depth that they are inserted into a user's ear canal. Additionally, the small size of the device, combined with increasingly complex electronics present other performance problems such as increased sensitivity to vibrations, more delicate components because of their small size, and the accompanying possibility of device failure.
The quality of the microphone system that receives sound waves is also critical to the performance of the hearing device. In general, hearing aids are configured with a microphone and a receiver (speaker) connected by an electronic circuit. The microphone picks up vibrational energy, i.e. sound waves, from the air or from the physical connection to the hearing aid. The physical connections can include the points where the hearing device shell and conducting wires join the receiver. A hearing device microphone transduces the sound waves into an electrical signal. The receiver (or speaker) then transduces the amplified electrical signal from the microphone and from any type of programming circuitry into vibrational energy which is then heard by a user. When driven by an electronic signal, the receiver itself will vibrate. Vibrations are also generated from within a user's own skull. If the receiver is in contact with another hearing device component, these vibrations will be transferred from the receiver to the component, and from the component to the microphone. This often causes unwanted feedback. Typically this contact with other components occurs at the receiver port area, where the amplified sound exits the hearing device. This unwanted contact can also occur between a receiver wall and the hearing aid shell.
A known approach in larger hearing devices is to try and suspend the receiver away from the hearing device shell. However, in smaller hearing aids it is difficult to do this reliably. Receivers are typically suspended by means of two functional elements, the first being a piece of tubing connected to a port on the end of the receiver, and the second being an elastomeric sleeve about the body of the receiver can. The tubing and the sleeve can be configured as two components or integrated into a single piece suspension. In the single piece version, the tubing is molded as a unit with the sleeve about the receiver body. Non-woven fabric tapes are also commonly used to isolate the receiver from the shell wall.
Additionally, known receiver suspensions are typically made from a low durometer rubber such a silicone and neoprene. These devices are often molded with small bumps or flanges that help to reduce the contact area between the suspension and a shell wall. However, these molded suspensions present problems. First, since the hearing aid shell on custom hearing aids vary greatly from device to device, this often defeats the effectiveness of the small flanged features on the molded tips. This is due to contact between the shell and the receiver along larger surface areas or due to wedging the rubber suspensions too tightly along a shell wall.
Second, the elastomeric suspensions are generally glued into place in the hearing aid shell, or the receiver port. This glue can wick along the materials and harden the otherwise compliant materials, thus defeating the purpose of utilizing a receiver suspension. Also the molded suspensions are relatively large due to limitations in molding technology, the wire coming from the receiver can interfere with the suspension, and the wire attached to the receiver can contact the receiver and shell in uncontrolled ways thereby further contributing to feedback problems. Furthermore, lower durometer suspension tubes are delicate and susceptible to failure due to mechanical ingress caused by cleaning and probing, providing a direct ingress path for cerumen and other contaminates. Finally, silicone suspension tubes are very difficult to glue and attach because silicone compatible adhesives are generally slow to cure.
What is needed is a simple way of suspending the receiver away from the wall of the hearing aid shell without the addition of a large suspension apparatus. What is also needed is a receiver suspension that allows quick and simple installation and is essentially universal for a wide range of hearing devices.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device shell comprises a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end. The housing is adapted to be inserted into the hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing. An isolation membrane at least partially surrounds the hearing device receiver such that, upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber. The isolation membrane prevents the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation membrane is formed from a stretched polymer material such as polyurethane or silicone and forms a series of pleats when engaged with the receiver.
In an alternate embodiment, a receiver suspension comprises a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end. The housing is adapted to be inserted into a hearing device shell. The receiver suspension also comprises a cover that is adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing. An isolation spring is adapted to engage the hearing device receiver such that upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation spring suspends the receiver within the housing chamber. The isolation membrane prevents the receiver from contacting the inside surface of the housing. Preferably, the isolation spring comprises first and second grasping members and a flexure member intermediate to and connected with the first and second grasping members. The flexure member preferably includes a pair of spring biased portions that maintain the receiver at a specified distance from the inside surface of the receiver housing. The receiver suspension can alternately be formed from a multi-layered laminate material that provides frequency response dampening.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The drawings illustrate both the design and utility of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, in which similar elements in different embodiments are referred to by the same reference numbers for purposes of ease in illustration of the invention, wherein:
FIG. 1
is an exploded perspective view of a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2
is a partially assembled view of the receiver suspension of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 3
is a longitudinal cross sectional view of an assembled receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4
is a longitudinal cross sectional view of an alternate embodiment of an assembled receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 5
is a perspective view of a receiver suspension isolation member constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 6
is an alternate embodiment of a receiver suspension isolation member constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 7
is a first embodiment showing a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention mounted within a hearing device shell; and
FIG. 8
is a second embodiment showing a receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention mounted within a hearing device shell.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIGS. 1-3
show a hearing device receiver suspension
50
constructed in accordance with the present invention. In the embodiment of
FIGS. 1-3
, the receiver suspension
50
has a rigid housing
60
that includes an open proximal end
61
and a distal end
63
. The housing
60
includes a sound port
68
extending from the distal end
63
. Preferably, the housing
60
is cylindrically shaped and has an inside surface
64
that defines a chamber
70
, and an outside surface
66
. The housing
60
is preferably formed from a strong metal that allows a thin wall construction without sacrificing strength or rigidity. Such a construction allows the thickness of a wall
62
of the housing to be minimized. Particularly in CIC hearing devices, it is often critical to try and minimize the size of the hearing device components.
When fully assembled (best seen in FIG.
3
), the proximal end
61
of the housing
60
is closed by an end cap
80
. The end cap
80
is adapted to securely engage with the proximal end
61
of the housing
60
. The end cap
80
has a proximal surface
82
that includes an aperture
88
. When the end cap
80
is engaged with the housing
60
, the aperture
88
provides access to the chamber
70
. Preferably, the end cap
80
forms a sleeved interference fit with the proximal end
61
of the housing
60
so that it will independently remain in place. A glue, or other type of bio-compatible sealant
86
may also be used to more permanently attach the end cap
80
to the housing
60
. The sealant
86
may also be used to seal the chamber
70
from the outside environment in order to prevent contaminates such as water, oil, or debris from entering the chamber
70
.
An isolation membrane
120
at least partially surrounds a hearing device receiver
100
. Preferably, the isolation membrane
120
is formed from a stretched polymer that forms a series of pleats
122
and
124
when it is stretched around the receiver
100
. The assembled receiver
100
and isolation membrane
120
are inserted into the chamber
70
defined by the housing
60
. The series of pleats
122
and
124
run substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the isolation membrane and allow the receiver
100
to be suspended within the chamber
70
. The pleats
122
and
124
require only a small contact area between the isolation membrane
120
and the inside surface
64
of the housing
60
in order to suspend the receiver
100
within the housing
60
. When surrounded by the isolation membrane
120
, the receiver
100
itself does not directly contact the inside surface
64
of the housing
60
.
FIGS. 1 and 3
show the isolation membrane
120
with the pleats
122
folding away from the central opening in the isolation membrane
120
. At rest, the isolation membrane
120
is a flat planar object with a central opening that can be formed by cutting two slits that form an X through the center of the isolation membrane
120
. The slits form pleats
122
(or
124
) that lie parallel to the opening when the isolation membrane
120
is at rest. But as shown in
FIGS. 1 and 3
, the pleats fold away from the opening when a receiver
100
is inserted through the opening in the isolation membrane
120
.
While
FIGS. 1-3
show a series of two pleats
122
and
124
formed by the isolation membrane
120
, it is contemplated that there may be a fewer or a greater number of these pleats depending on the precise material chosen to form the isolation membrane
120
, the configuration of the isolation membrane, and the degree to which the isolation membrane is stretched around the receiver
100
. A larger number of pleats necessarily means that a larger contact area is maintained between the isolation membrane
120
and the inside surface
64
of the housing
60
but may result in a more stable suspension system.
Since the isolation membrane
120
is preferably formed from a polymeric membrane material such as polyurethane or silicone, its thickness can be reduced to between 0.001 and 0.003 inches. This is a significantly reduced thickness as opposed to the use of known molded rubber suspensions which have a wall thickness between 0.007 and 0.010 inches. Known rubber molding processes do not permit the small thicknesses that can be achieved with the use of a membrane type material. Since reducing the size of the individual hearing device components is crucial in the design and production of CIC hearing devices, reducing the size of the isolation membrane
120
allows the housing
60
and the entire hearing device to be smaller as well.
The sound port
68
that extends from the distal end of the housing
60
aligns with a speaker
101
that is incorporated into the receiver
100
. Known hearing device receivers that incorporate a sound port directly onto the receiver require that the sound port directly engage with an aperture on the hearing device shell. This direct contact between the receiver and the hearing device shell can compound the undesired effects of vibrational feedback. A receiver suspension constructed in accordance with the present invention incorporates the sound port
68
onto the housing
60
, thereby eliminating the need to incorporate the sound port directly on the receiver. This results in fewer of the receiver components being in direct contact with the housing
60
and therefore a hearing device shell, aiding in the overall reduction of vibrational feedback.
The sound port
68
located on the distal end of the receiver housing
60
funnels the acoustic energy produced by the receiver
60
and directs it toward a user's inner ear and eventually the tympanic membrane (ear drum). Rather than a portion of the receiver itself being inserted through an aperture on a hearing device shell, the sound port
68
on the housing
60
can instead be inserted through the same aperture. This further isolates the receiver
60
from the other portions of the hearing device, the only contact between these elements being the portions of the isolation membrane pleats
122
and
124
that suspend the receiver
100
within the chamber
70
.
Prior to inserting the receiver
100
into a hearing device shell, the receiver
100
is pre-suspended within the receiver housing
60
and the entire assembly can be inserted as a module into the hearing device shell. The size of the housing
60
can therefore be standardized for use in a variety of hearing device shells because the isolation membrane can account for any extra space between the housing
60
and the receiver
100
. Various receivers
100
can also be utilized with a single sized housing
60
by providing differently sized isolation membranes
120
.
The receiver
100
also includes contact pads
104
on its distal end that enable wires
106
to be connected to the receiver
100
. The wires
106
are then threaded through the aperture
88
formed through the end cap
80
, and are routed to the various electronics located within the hearing device. For example, the wires may lead to an integrated sound processing circuit. Any gaps left between the aperture
88
and the wires
106
are filled with a sealant
90
to ensure that the receiver continues to be protected from dirt, moisture and other contaminates and to prevent sound leakage.
FIG. 4
shows a further preferred embodiment of a hearing device receiver suspension
150
constructed in accordance with the present invention. The receiver suspension
150
has a rigid housing
160
that has an open proximal end
161
and a distal end
163
. The housing
160
also includes a sound port
168
extending from the distal end
163
. Preferably, the housing
160
is cylindrically shaped with an inside surface
164
that defines a chamber
170
, and an outside surface
166
. The housing
160
is formed from a strong metal that allows a thin wall construction without sacrificing strength or rigidity. The utilization of such a material for the housing
160
allows the thickness of a wall
162
to be minimized. Particularly in CIC devices, it is critical to minimize the size of the various components.
When fully assembled, the proximal end
161
of the housing
160
is closed by an end cap
180
. The end cap
180
is adapted to securely engage with the proximal end
161
of the housing
160
. The end cap
180
has a proximal surface
182
that includes an aperture
188
. When the end cap
180
is engaged with the housing
160
, the aperture
188
extends through the proximal surface
182
of the end cap
180
and into the chamber
170
. Preferably, the end cap
180
forms a sleeved interference fit with the proximal end
161
of the housing
160
so that it will independently remain in place. A glue, or other type of bio-compatible sealant
186
may also be used to more permanently attach the end cap
180
to the housing
160
. The sealant
186
may also be used to seal the chamber
170
from the outside environment in order to prevent contaminates such as water, oil, or debris from entering the chamber
170
. A receiver
200
includes contact pads
204
on its distal end that enable wires
206
to be connected to the receiver
200
. The wires
206
are then threaded through the aperture
188
formed through the end cap
180
and are routed to the various electronics located within the hearing device. For example, the wires may lead to an integrated sound processing circuit. Any gaps left between the aperture
188
and the wires
206
are filled with a sealant
190
to ensure that the receiver continues to be protected from dirt, moisture and other contaminates.
A pair of isolation springs
220
are inserted between the receiver
200
and the inside wall
164
of the housing
160
. The isolation springs
220
suspend the receiver
200
within the chamber
170
so that only a minimum amount of contact is maintained between the isolation springs
220
and the inside wall
164
of the housing. No part of the receiver
200
directly contacts the inside wall
164
of the housing
160
.
Referring to
FIG. 5
, the isolation springs
220
are shown in greater detail. Each of the isolation springs
220
includes a first grasping member
222
, a second grasping member
224
, and a flexure member
227
. The flexure member
227
is disposed in between the first and second grasping members
222
and
224
with each of the grasping members
222
and
224
being offset from the flexure member
227
by a substantially equal distance. Each of the two grasping members
222
and
224
and the flexure member
227
are aligned substantially parallel to each other and are connected by a pair of cross members
236
and
238
. Each of the grasping members
222
and
224
are substantially flat and lie in a substantially common plane. Each of the grasping members
222
and
224
has a first end and a second end, each of the ends including a flange
226
extending from the surface of the respective grasping member. Each of the flanges
226
extend away from the surface of the grasping members in a common direction.
The flexure member
227
includes a first spring biased portion
232
and a second spring biased portion
234
. The flexure member
227
, and more specifically the two spring biased portions
232
and
234
enable the isolation springs
220
to suspend a receiver within a receiver housing, while also securing the receiver in place. As shown in
FIG. 4
, each isolation spring
220
is attached to the receiver
200
with the flanges
226
directed toward the receiver
200
. The length of the grasping members
222
and
224
are such that the flanges
226
extend over the proximal and distal edges of the receiver and therefore hold the receiver
200
in place. The lengths of the grasping members
222
and
224
are substantially parallel to the receiver
200
. The flexure member
227
is biased in a direction opposite to the direction that the flanges
226
extend. As best illustrated in
FIG. 4
, when a receiver
200
is inserted into a housing
160
with the pair of isolation springs
220
attached to it, the flexure members
227
exert a force on the inside surface
164
of the housing
160
. The force exerted by the flexure members simultaneously cause each of the grasping members
222
and
224
to exert an opposite force against a top surface
202
and a bottom surface
208
of the receiver
200
. The isolation springs
220
, thereby suspend the receiver
200
within the chamber
170
defined by the housing
160
.
Each of the flexure members
227
have a pair of contact surfaces
228
and
230
located at each of the opposite extremities of the flexure member
227
. The contact surfaces
228
and
230
are the only portions of the flexure member
227
and of the entire isolation spring
220
that maintains contact with the inside surface
164
of the housing
160
when the receiver
200
and the isolation spring
220
are engaged and inserted into the housing
160
.
The isolation spring
220
is preferably made from a thin easily controlled material such as a metal alloy or a thin formed polymer film. The material can also be formed by a chemical etching, electroforming, laser cutting, plasma etching, plasma deposition or other suitable means. The spring biasing of the suspension member, and more specifically the flexure member
227
, interfaces with the housing
160
and the receiver
200
in a controlled and tuned manner that is capable of being adapted to the specific frequency range of the hearing device being used. The thickness, material properties, and geometry of the flexure member
227
is preferably selected to best isolate the receiver, in light of the frequency range of the hearing device, the mass of the receiver
200
, and the mass of the hearing device (i.e. the shell structure and associated conformal tip). Preferably, the isolation member will have a low resonant frequency so that the higher frequency components are isolated and will not conduct vibrational energy back to the microphone.
FIG. 6
shows an alternate embodiment of an isolation spring
320
. The isolation spring
320
utilizes a controlled flexure suspension similar to the isolation spring
220
described in conjunction with
FIG. 5
, while additionally employing a multi-layer laminated structure. The isolation spring
320
includes the same geometric components as the isolation spring
220
, namely, a pair of grasping members
322
and
324
and a single flexure member
327
. The orientation of the flexure member in relation to the grasping members is similar to that of the isolation spring
220
of FIG.
5
. The isolation spring
320
also includes flanges
326
located on each of the ends of the grasping members
322
and
324
. A second isolation spring layer
320
-
a
is bonded to the main layer to form the multi-layer structure. Further layers may be utilized in order to achieve a flexure with specific frequency response characteristics.
The laminate multi-layer structure of
FIG. 6
is specifically designed to maintain the low frequency suspension and to additionally add a constrained or viscous type construction in order to dampen and absorb energy stored in the isolation spring, and more specifically, the flexure members. The laminated multi-layer structure can be fabricated as a thin metal sheet coated on one or both sides by a polymer layer. Preferably, the polymer layer has a viscous or lossy nature, and acts to absorb energy. The polymer layers can be coated in place, as is commonly done using conformal coatings on printed circuit boards. Materials that would have vibration dissipation properties of varying degrees include, but are not limited to: silicones, polyurethanes, epoxies, and acrylic materials. Alternately, the base structure of the flexure member can be laminated prior to forming using a mylar material. The polymer can be heat laminated with a bondable material such as a urethane film or the dampening layer can be applied by vapor deposition or another type of tin film deposition process.
FIGS. 7 and 8
show two alternate embodiments of a receiver suspension and more specifically, the mounting schemes for attaching the receiver suspension to a hearing device shell.
FIG. 7
shows a receiver housing
150
as described in conjunction with FIG.
4
. The receiver housing
150
is shown as it would engage within a hearing device shell
400
. The hearing device shell
400
includes an aperture
412
on its distal end, and an extension tube
410
that extends through the aperture
412
and into a chamber
414
defined by the hearing device shell
400
. The sound port
168
on the distal end of the receiver housing is adapted to engage with the extension tube
410
. Sound that is created by the receiver will thus be directed out of the sound port
168
through the extension tube
410
and out of the aperture
412
. The aperture
412
is aligned on the distal end of the hearing device shell
400
so that when the hearing device is inserted into a user's ear canal, the aperture will align with and direct the sound waves generated by the hearing device directly toward the tympanic membrane (ear drum). The extension tube also helps to suspend the receiver suspension
150
, and thus the receiver
200
, within the chamber
414
, providing further isolation to the receiver. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/467,102, filed on Dec. 10, 1999, describes a preferred embodiment of a receiver suspension that utilizes a grommet to suspend the receiver within the hearing device shell, the details of which are hereby incorporated into the present application by reference.
FIG. 8
shows the receiver suspension
150
including an integrated extended sound port
170
. The hearing device shell
400
includes an aperture
414
through which the extended sound port
170
can engage. The embodiment of
FIG. 8
eliminates the need for the additional extension tube
410
described in conjunction with FIG.
7
. The extended sound port
170
engaged within the aperture
414
suspends the receiver housing
150
within the chamber
414
thus providing further isolation to the receiver housing
150
and thus the receiver
200
.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in the above description and drawings, it is understood that this description is by example only and that numerous changes and modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted, except by the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims
- 1. A receiver suspension for isolating a hearing device receiver within a hearing device shell, comprising:a housing having an inside surface that defines a chamber, an open proximal end, and a distal end; a cover adapted to engage with the proximal end of the housing; and an isolation membrane, the isolation membrane at least partially surrounding the hearing device receiver such that, upon insertion of the hearing device receiver into the housing, the isolation membrane suspends the receiver within the housing chamber and prevents contact between the receiver and the housing inside surface, wherein the isolation membrane has a first side, a second side, an opening through its center that is sized to stretch over substantially the entire receiver, and at least one pleat lying parallel with the opening, said pleat folding away from the opening when the receiver is inserted through the opening.
- 2. The receiver suspension of claim 1, further comprising a sound port on the distal end of the housing.
- 3. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the cover substantially seals the open proximal end of the housing when engaged therewith.
- 4. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the cover includes an aperture extending therethrough, wherein the aperture provides access to the housing chamber when the cover is engaged with the housing.
- 5. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the isolation membrane is formed from polyurethane or silicon.
- 6. The receiver suspension of claim 1, wherein the isolation membrane maintains a minimum amount of contact with the housing inside surface.
US Referenced Citations (41)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
43 39 899 |
Jun 1995 |
DE |
0 367 855 |
May 1990 |
EP |
WO 9913686 |
Mar 1999 |
WO |