Modular humeral head resurfacing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10034758
  • Patent Number
    10,034,758
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 16, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 31, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A two piece humeral component for use in joint arthroplasty which is adapted to be implanted into a joint and engaged by a socket component of the joint. The joint component includes a body having a first articulating surface and a second medial surface opposite the first articulating surface. The first articulating surface is adapted to be engaged by the socket and the second medial surface is adapted to be secured to mounting portion. The mounting portion has a first surface and a second medial surface. The first surface is adapted to be fixably engaged to the second mounting portion of the humeral component. The second medial surface is adapted to be secured to the humerus. A peg which has a first end adapted to engage a cavity found in the humerus is disposed on the mounting portion's second medial surface.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for shoulder arthroplasty and, more particularly, to a humeral component and other associated surgical components and instruments for use in shoulder arthroplasty.


2. Discussion of the Related Art


A natural shoulder joint may undergo degenerative changes due to a variety of etiologies. When these degenerative changes become so far advanced and irreversible, it may ultimately become necessary to replace a natural shoulder joint with a prosthetic shoulder joint. When implantation of such a shoulder joint prosthesis becomes necessary, the natural head portion of the humerus is resected and a cavity is created in the intramedullary canal of the host humerus for accepting a humeral component. The humeral component includes a head portion used to replace the natural head of the humerus. Once the humeral component has been implanted, the humeral cavity positioned at the scapula socket may also be resurfaced and shaped to accept a glenoid component. The humeral component generally includes an articulating surface which engages and articulates with the socket portion of the glenoid component.


It is generally known in the art to provide a shoulder joint prosthesis having a humeral component, as discussed above. However, current prior art humeral components along with the associated surgical components and instruments utilized during shoulder arthroplasty suffer from many disadvantages.


For example, since the humeral component is subject to various types of loading by the glenoid component, the humeral component must offer a stable and secure articulating surface. To achieve this, some humeral components provide a post or stem attached to a lateral surface of the prosthetic humeral head. These humeral components are generally a single piece system with a single stem, which is inserted and cemented into a hole bored deeply into the intramedullary cavity. However, such existing humeral components also exhibit several disadvantages. For example, these types of stemmed humeral components utilize a large stem to stabilize and secure the humeral component to the humerus. Such humeral components increase the amount of bone tissue removed, while also increasing the labor and complexity of the shoulder arthroplasty. Other stemmed humeral components may offer a larger diameter stem. However, the larger diameter stem also requires excess bone tissue to be removed which may not be practical in some patients.


Other prior art humeral components, such as that disclosed in WO 01/67988 A2 sets out a stemless humeral component or head that provides an integral cruciform shape that includes two planar intersecting fins. While this type of humeral component addresses the amount of bone tissue removed, this type of system provides little versatility or adjustments to a surgeon performing the shoulder arthroplasty. Moreover, this type of system does not provide additional enhanced fixation other than the planar intersecting fins.


Additionally, most prior art humeral components only rely on the stem to secure the humeral component into the intramedullary canal, via a cement mantle or bone attachment. The stem may also include grooves or holes, which act as an anchor, once the stem is cemented within the intramedullary canal. The medial surface of most humeral components are thus generally overlooked to enhance cement fixation and are therefore generally smooth. Although some humeral components may include a few longitudinal grooves and others may include both grooves and depressions on the medial surface, such surface enhancements only utilize or texture a portion of the medial surface, thereby not advantageously using the entire medial surface.


What is needed then is a modular humeral component and associated surgical components for use in shoulder arthroplasty which do not suffer from the above-mentioned disadvantages. This in turn, will provide a humeral component which is stable and secure, reduces the overall amount of bone tissue required to be removed, increases a surgeon's available components utilizing a single sized post, reduces the overall surgical time and complexity, increases overall medial surface area, enhances and increases post strength without increasing overall post diameter, provides a fully enhanced or textured medial surface for enhanced cement fixation or bone fixation and increased overall stability, provides for a uniform cement mantle, and provides increased tensile and shear strength. It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide such a humeral component and associated surgical components for use in shoulder arthroplasty.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, an apparatus and method for shoulder arthroplasty is disclosed. The apparatus and method employs a modular humeral component and other associated surgical components for use in the shoulder arthroplasty. In this regard, the modular humeral component is adapted to be implanted into a humerus and engaged by a glenoid portion of a scapular component.


In one preferred embodiment, a modular humeral component is used for shoulder arthroplasty such that the humeral component is adapted to be implanted into a humerus and engage a glenoid component. The humeral component includes a head member having a first articulating surface and a second fixation surface, which is opposite to the first articulating surface. The first articulating surface is adapted to engage the articulating surface of the glenoid component and the second fixation surface is adapted to engage a fixation component. The fixation component has a first surface adapted to be secured to the head member and a second surface that is generally opposite the first surface. The second surface includes a fixation member adapted to be secured to the humerus.


Use of the present invention provides an apparatus and method for shoulder arthroplasty, and specifically, a modular humeral component and associated surgical components for use in shoulder arthroplasty. As a result, the aforementioned disadvantages associated with the currently available humeral components and associated surgical components for shoulder arthroplasty have been substantially reduced or eliminated.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Still other advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the following specification and by reference to the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the humeral component according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment of the invention shown implanted in a skeletal structure;



FIGS. 2a-2c are views of the fixation member of humeral component of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 3a-9 are alternate embodiments for the fixation member of the humeral component of the present invention;



FIGS. 10-12 represent alternate peg configurations for the fixation member of the humeral component of the present invention;



FIGS. 13 and 14 represent alternate texturing, which is usable in the humeral components of the present invention;



FIGS. 15 and 16 represent cross-sectional views of implanted humeral components of the present invention;



FIGS. 17 through 22 depict an alternate embodiment of the present invention having an insert member disposed between the head and the base member;



FIGS. 23a-23e depict another alternate embodiment of the present invention having flanges disposed on a shelfless base member;



FIGS. 24-26
b illustrate a method for preparing the humerus implantation of the humeral component using associated surgical components according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 27-28 further illustrate methods for implanting the humeral components into the prepared humerus according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 29a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member having a through stem fixation bore;



FIGS. 30a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member having a male Morse taper with through stem fixation bore;



FIGS. 31a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member having a female Morse taper with through stem fixation bore;



FIGS. 32a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member



FIG. 33 represents a perspective view of an alternate fixation member;



FIG. 34 represents a cross-sectional view of the fixation member shown in FIG. 33;



FIG. 35 represents a cross-sectional view of an alternate fixation member;



FIGS. 36a and 36b represent an alternate fixation component having a fixation member;



FIG. 37 represents the coupling of a bone engagement member to a fixation shelf;



FIG. 38 represents a fixation member having a concave shelf member;



FIGS. 39a, 39b, and 39c represents the implantation of a fixation member;



FIG. 40 represents a prosthetic according to another embodiment to the invention;



FIGS. 41 and 42 are side views of the prosthetic shown in FIG. 40;



FIG. 43 represents a perspective view of the implantation of the coupling member shown in FIG. 40; and



FIGS. 44 and 45 represent side views of the implantation of a humeral prosthetic head into the coupling member shown in FIGS. 43 and 42.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description of the preferred embodiments concerning an apparatus and method for shoulder arthroplasty is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.



FIG. 1 depicts the components used in the shoulder arthroplasty of the current invention. As shown, the modular humeral component 31 has a base member 32 and a head member 33. The base member 32 has a fixation peg 34, which is used to attach the humeral component to the resected portion 36 of the humerus 38. If a total shoulder arthroplasty is performed, a glenoid component 40 is first implanted into the scapula 42 using techniques well known in the art. The glenoid component 40 is preferably of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,551, which is hereby incorporated by reference, or other suitable conventional glenoid components. The humeral component 31 is designed to allow rotational and transitional movement of the head member 33 with respect to the glenoid component 40.



FIGS. 2a-2c depict the base member 32 of one embodiment of the current invention. The base member 32 is defined by a shelf member 44, which may have a plurality of through holes 46. The shelf member 44 can have at least one mating member 48 for engaging the head member 33 of the humeral component 31. It is preferred that the mating member 48 be a defined Morse taper or other suitable attaching mechanism. In addition to the mating member 48, each base member 32 has a fixation peg 34 disposed on the lower lateral surface 50 of shelf member 44. The fixation peg 34 is generally perpendicular to the shelf member for its entire length of the fixation peg 34. As depicted in FIGS. 2a-3, the shelf member 44 of the base member 32 can define flat lower lateral surface 50 and flat generally parallel upper surfaces 51. FIG. 3a shows the second embodiment of the current invention, which has a cavity 52 defined in the shelf member 44. The cavity 52 is preferably the female side of a Morse taper, which would engage a male Morse taper on the head member 33.



FIG. 3b shows the head member 33 which mates with the base member 32 of FIG. 3a. It should be noted that a surgical kit of the components would contain numerous head members 33, each having a varied radius of curvature, diameter, and height to allow a surgeon to optimize joint movement. Additionally, a surgical kit would contain the instruments needed for implantation (shown later).


The head member 33 and base member 32 must be made of bio-compatible materials such as, without limitation, titanium, titanium alloys, surgical alloys, stainless steels, bio-compatible ceramics, and cobalt alloys. Optionally, the base member 32 can additionally be made of materials such as biocompatible ceramics and resorbable and non-resorbable polymers and other anticipated bio-compatible metallic or polymeric materials. Should the base member 32 be made of non-metallic components, a fastener would be needed to couple the head 33 to the base 32.


As shown in FIGS. 4-7, the shelf members 44 need not to be planar. FIGS. 4 and 5 show the base member 32 and having an interior concave surface 56 and a convex medial surface 58. Base members, as disclosed in FIGS. 4 and 5 would be used in situations where maximum bone removal in the humerus 38 is required. In each situation, the head member 33 would have a convex medial surface 59 for engaging the concave surface 56. It is envisioned as with all of the embodiments that the base members 32 and head member 33 can be coupled using the mating member 48, i.e., Morse taper. The use of the convex-concave interface provides a coupling interface which is self centering under a multitude of loading conditions. The interface reduces the occurrence of micro-motions which can disrupt the normal functioning of the joint prosthesis as well as lead to premature component failures. Any loads applied to the articulating surface of the head member 33, are transferred as a perpendicular force into the base member 32 of the modular humeral component 31 through the non-planar shelf member 44.



FIGS. 6 and 7 define base members 32 having the shelf member 60 having a convex outer surface 62. Additionally shown is a concave inner surface 64 for mating with a resected head 36 of the humerus 38. The base members as depicted in FIGS. 6 and 7 can be used when minimal bone removal is possible and will generally encapsulate the hemispheric shape cut into the humerus 38 as described later. As with the base members as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, any loads applied to the articulating surface of the head member 33, are transferred as a perpendicular force into the base member 32 of the modular humeral component 31.



FIGS. 8 and 9 disclose alternate embodiments of the base member 32 for the humeral component 31. FIG. 8 depicts the base member 32 having a convex outer surface 66 and a flat lateral surface 68. The base members as depicted in FIGS. 2a-3 and 8 can be utilized when a moderate amount of bone material must be removed from the resected head 36 of the humerus 38. FIG. 9 depicts the base member 32 having a flat upper surface 51 and a convex lateral surface 58. This base member would readily utilize the head member 33 as used with the base member as depicted in FIG. 2a. It is envisioned that either base member can have a defined male or female mating member 48 in the form of a Morse taper.



FIGS. 10-12 depict possible configurations for the fixation peg 34. FIG. 10 shows the fixation peg 34 defining a plurality of flutes 70 therein. As can be seen, the modular system does not need a shelf member 44. Without the shelf member 44, the base can have either a male or female Morse taper. FIGS. 11 and 12 depict the fixation peg 34 being at a tapered prism with the base of the prism coupled to the lower lateral surface 50 of the shelf member 44.



FIGS. 13 and 14 depict possible surface treatments for the lower lateral surface 50 of the shelf member 44 and fixation peg 34. All of the possible fixation pegs 34 can have a porous coated region 72, which will assist in the fixation of the component to the humerus 38. Additionally, all of the lower lateral surfaces 50 of the shelf member 44 can define a waffle pattern 74 to assist in the incorporation of bone cement. Each fixation peg 34 extends from the lower lateral surface 50 to define or fill in a coupling region 75 having a diameter of about 0.50 inches. Each coupling region 75 also includes a sidewall 77 formed with and from the lower lateral surface 50. The coupling region 75 provides a smooth flat surface for which the fixation peg 34 extends out, and reduces or eliminates any stress risers about each fixation peg 34, which could be caused by positioning the lower lateral surface 50 immediately adjacent the fixation peg 34.


The fixation peg 34 includes a first end 79, which is inserted into or engages a cavity or hole formed within a cavity in the humerus and a second end 81, which extends from or is integral with the shelf member 44. The first end 79 is semi-spherical and the second end has a 0.25 inch radius about the circumference of the second end 81 of the peg, which blends into a flat or smooth portion of the coupling region 75 to decrease the overall sheer stress of the fixation peg 34. Optionally, should the fixation peg be non-metallic, embedded within the first end of each fixation peg 34 is a tantalum ball 83. The tantalum ball 83 enables the humeral component 31 to be easily identified in an x-ray.



FIGS. 15 and 16 depict cross-sectional views of various embodiments of the current invention implanted into resected head 36 of humerus 38. As depicted in FIG. 16, when a large amount of bone mass must be removed during the arthroplasty, the base member 32 as depicted in FIG. 9 can be used. As is shown, the base member 32 is fixed to the humerus 38 using a plurality of screws 85. The lateral surface 59 of the head member 33 defines a cavity 52 for receiving the mating member 48 or Morse taper post.


As with the base member depicted in FIG. 15, the base member 32 is held to the humerus 38 by use of screws 85 disposed through the holes 46. FIG. 16 discloses the use of the base member 32 as depicted in FIG. 3a which is similarly held in place by use of fixation screws 85 to the humerus 38.



FIGS. 17 through 18 show an alternate embodiment of the humeral component 109. Base member 110 is shown having a modified Morse taper cavity 116. The humeral component 109 further has a head portion 112 with a male Morse taper portion 121. Disposed between the head portion 112 and the base member 110 is a coupling member 114. Coupling member 114 has an outer surface 118 which acts as the male portion of a Morse taper to bond with the cavity 116 of the base member 110. Coupling member 114 further defines a female portion 120 of a Morse taper which corresponds to the male portion 121 of the Morse taper of the head portion 112. The coupling portion 114 functions to move the center of curvature of the head portion 112 a fixed distance 123 from the center line of the base member 110. This functions to effectively change the centering location of the head portion 112 with respect to the humerus 138, thus allowing the surgeon more flexibility.



FIG. 17a shows the alternate humeral component 109 in its assembled configuration. FIG. 18 shows an exploded view of the alternate humeral component 109, coupling member 114, and base member 110. Rotation of coupling member 114 allows for translation of the head portion 112 on the base member 110. FIGS. 19 through 19b depict a head portion 112 having a female Morse taper cavity 116 which engages a male Morse taper 115 on alternate coupling member 114. FIG. 19a depicts an assembled view of the alternate humeral component 109.



FIGS. 21 through 21
b depict an alternate embodiment of the humeral component 122. Shown is the base member 124 which has a modified female cavity defining a Morse taper 116. The head portion 126 has a coupling male Morse taper 132 disposed on the medial surface of the head component 126. Disposed between the head portion 126 and the base portion 124 is the coupling member 128. The coupling member 128 defines an outer surface 118 which functions as the male portion of the Morse taper and couples to the female portion 116 of the base member 124. The coupling member 128 further defines an interior cavity 130 which functions as a female Morse taper for the male Morse taper 132 of the head 126. The interior cavity 130 of the coupling member has an offset angle 134, which functions to rotate the center of curvature of the head portion 126 with respect to the base member 124. Similarly, shown in FIG. 21b is a coupling member 114 having a male Morse taper 115 being angled.



FIGS. 20 and 22 show the alternate humeral components 122 inserted into a resected humerus. As with the other humeral components, the base member is fixed to the head of the humerus using fasteners.



FIGS. 23a-23e depict another alternate embodiment of the present invention. Shown is a shelfless base member 232 which is formed by a fixation peg 234. Each fixation peg 234 has three evenly spaced triangular fins 236 disposed thereon. The triangular fins 236 have an edge 239 which is co-planar to a top surface 238 of fixation peg 234. Incorporated into a top surface 238 of the fixation peg 234 is a fixing mechanism 240.



FIGS. 23a and 23b disclose fixing mechanism 240 in the form of a female Morse taper as the fixation which functions to couple the head 30 onto the base member 232 (see FIG. 23d). As can be seen FIG. 23e, the top surface 238 alternately can have a fixing mechanism 240 in the form of a male Morse taper disposed thereon. It is envisioned that a head member 30 being used in this embodiment can have a lower surface 244 which has a porous coat, plasma spray, grit blast, or smooth surface to facilitate the coupling to the bone.


When the base member 240 is coupled to head member 30, there is a defined gap between the lower surface 244 of the head 30 and the upper surface 238 of the base member 232. After implantation, the lower surface 244 of head member 30 rests upon the resected bone, not the top surface 238 of the base member 232.


The method for implanting the humeral component 31, along with associate surgical components utilized will now be described with reference to FIGS. 24a-28. The head of the humerus 38 is resected using a saw, chisel then planed flat or with a concavity. With the resected head 36 of the humerus 38 exposed, an alignment or guide hole 90 is first drilled substantially through the center of resected head 36 of the humerus 38 using a quick release drill bit 96 and driver 98. Optionally, the resected head 36 of humerus 38 can be resected to provide a flat surface during the drilling of pilot hole 90.


Once the guide hole 90 is drilled, the resected head 36 of humerus 38 is optionally reamed using a concave spherical reamer shaft 102 with the driver 98. The concave reamer 102 includes a guide pin 104 and a roughened spherical surface 106 substantially corresponding to the spherical shape of the lower medial surface of the shelf member 44 of base member 32. An optional convex reamer surface 108 permits rasping or drilling of tight humeral cavities (see FIGS. 26a and 26b). Upon rotating the surface of the reamer, the bone of the resected head 36 of the humerus 38 is prepared to mate or conform to the shape of the lower lateral surface 50 of the shelf member 44 of the base member 32. As depicted in FIGS. 25a and 26b, the reamer 102 can have a convex shape or alternatively a flat shape, which reams a concave shape into the resected head 36 of the humerus 38. Determining which reamer is used is a function of the preoperative degenerative changes in the humerus 38.


With reference to FIGS. 27-28, which depict the insertion of the humeral components 30, once the surface of the resected head 36 of the humerus 38 has been resected, the base member 32 is inserted into the guide hole 90. It is envisioned that fixation peg 34 of the base member 32 can be forced into the guide hole 90 to displace the bone material around the intramedullary canal. Optionally, the guide hole 90 can also be reamed to a larger interior diameter to accept the base member 32 without displacement of the bone material by the fixation peg 34.


Once the base member 32 has been inserted into the guide hole 90, the optional screws 85 are disposed through the holes 46 to couple the base member 32 to the humerus 38. At this point, a surgeon may use any number of test head portions and/or adapter portions to determine the proper size needed to mate with the glenoid component. Once a proper head member 33 size has been determined, the final head member 33 can be fixed to the shelf member 44 of the base member 32.



FIGS. 26 and 27 show the use of the base member 32 as depicted in FIG. 3. As can be seen, the base member of FIG. 3 is utilized when a minimal amount of bone is required to be removed.



FIGS. 29a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member 246 defining a through member fixation bore 248. The shelf member 250 can have at least one mating member 252 for engaging the head member of the humeral component. The mating member 252 can be a defined female Morse taper 254 or other suitable attaching mechanism. In addition to the mating member 252, each fixation member 246 has a fixation peg 256 disposed on the lower lateral surface 258 of shelf member 250. The fixation peg 256 may be perpendicular to the shelf member for the entire length of the fixation peg 256. As depicted in FIGS. 29a-c, the shelf member 250 of the fixation member 246 can define a convex spherical lower lateral surface 258 and concave spherical upper lateral surface 260. FIG. 29a shows hidden lines representing the through member fixation bore 248. As shown, the female Morse taper 254 is optionally co-linear or concentric with both the through member fixation bore 248 and the fixation peg 256. Adjacent to the bottom 262 of the female Morse taper is a defined conical portion 264 which is configured to accept a head of a bone coupling screw.



FIGS. 30a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation member 266 having a mating member 268 in the form of a male Morse taper with a through stem fixation bore 270 for engaging the head member of the humeral component. In addition to the mating member 268, the fixation member 266 has a fixation peg 272 disposed on the lower lateral surface 274 of shelf member 276. The shelf member 276 can define convex spherical lower lateral surface 258 and concave spherical upper lateral surface 260. FIG. 30a shows hidden lines representing the through member fixation bore 270. As shown, the mating member 268, in the form of a Morse taper, is optionally co-linear with both the through member fixation bore 270 and the fixation peg 272. Disposed through the top 278 of the fixation member 268 is a defined conical portion 280 which is configured to accept a tapered head of a bone coupling screw.



FIGS. 31a-c and 32a-c represent side and perspective views of an alternate fixation members 282a and 282b. The members 282a and 282b have a shelf member 280 with mating features 284a and 284b for engaging the head member of the humeral component. The shelf member 280 of the fixation members 282a and 282b define a flat lower lateral surface 286 and convex spherical upper lateral surface 288. FIGS. 31a and 32a show hidden lines representing the through member fixation bore 290. The mating features 284a and 284b in the form of a Morse tapers are optionally co-linear with both the through member fixation bore 290 and a fixation peg 292. Disposed through the top 278 of the mating features 284a and 248b and fully though the fixation members 282a and 282b is a defined fixation bore 248 having a conical screw head supporting portion 298 which is configured to accept a tapered head of a bone coupling screw. This bone coupling screw can be positioned into or extended through the resected bone.


The fixation members depicted in FIGS. 29a through 32c are generally implanted as described above. Generally, a portion of the head of the joint is resected using a rasp or other appropriate cutting tool. A bore is then formed in the resected head. The fixation member is then fixed to the prepared surface. A fastener such as a bone screw then disposed through the fixation bore 290 to fasten the fixation member to the resected bone. At this point, a articulating head (shown in FIG. 1 or 15 through 22) is coupled to the fixation member. While specific fixation members are show in FIGS. 29-32c, the through bore feature is equally applicable to the fixation members shown in FIG. 1-14.


The modular nature of the humeral component 31 of the present invention allow a set of various types of both replacement base members 32 and head members 33 to be formed. In using such a set, a surgeon can interoperably choose the appropriate base member depending on the patient's particular degenerative condition. Additionally, the surgeon can then choose from a set of head members 33, which both have the proper articulating surface radius and a proper coupling to the base member 32.



FIGS. 33 and 34 represents a perspective and cross sectional views of an alternate fixation member 300. The fixation member 300 is formed of two components, a generally circular shelf member 302, and a bone engaging member 304. As described below, after an articulating surface is resected, an appropriate shelf member 302 is positioned against the resected surface. The bone engagement member 304 is then coupled to and through the shelf member 302 into the resected bone. An articulating head (not shown) is coupled to the bone fixation member to form a prosthetic with an articulating surface.


The bone engaging member 304 has a head engagement portion 306 and a threaded bone engagement portion 308. The bone engagement member 304 additionally has a shelf member engagement region 310 and drive feature 312. The shelf engagement region 310 functions to distribute and translate forces from the articulating head into the resected bone. It is envisioned that the shelf engagement region 310 can be an annular engagement flange 318 or textured cylindrical interface surface. The drive feature 312 can be an aperture having at least one defined flat drive surface, such as a hex aperture. The head engagement portion 306 can be a defined male 314 or female 316 Morse taper.


The shelf member 302 can be generally flat or curved. As described in previous embodiments, the shelf member 302 has upper and lower surfaces 320 and 322 which can be flat, concave or convex. The shelf members can additionally define a plurality of through apertures 324 that are configured to accept bone engaging screws to prevent rotation of the shelf member 302 during the insertion of the bone engaging member.



FIG. 34 shows the annular engagement flange 318 is positioned an upper surface 320 of the annular shelf member 302. The shelf member 302 defines an aperture which annularly supports the bone engaging member 304. It is envisioned that the male Morse taper 316 can be used to couple the fixation member to an articulating head (see FIGS. 15-21).



FIG. 35 represents a cross-sectional view of an alternate fixation member 302. Shown is the bone engaging member 304 having a head engagement portion 306 which is generally located below the shelf member 302. The head engagement portion 306 is shown as a female Morse taper 316. The annular engagement flange 318 is disposed within an annular coupling groove 326 which is formed about the aperture 328 of the shelf member 302. Defined in the bottom of the Female Morse taper 316 is the drive mechanism 312. It is envisioned that the annular coupling groove 326 can take the form of a tapered countersink.



FIGS. 36a and 36b represent an alternate fixation component having a bone fixation member 304. The upper surface 320 of the shelf member 302 is show being concave as previously described. The shelf member has a annular coupling groove 326 which mates with the annular flange 318 of the bone engaging member 304.



FIG. 37 represents a cross-sectional view of an alternate fixation member. Shown is the bone engaging member 304 having a head engagement portion 306 which is generally located below the shelf member 302. The head engagement portion 306 is shown as a female Morse taper 316. The annular engagement flange 318 is disposed on the upper surface 320 about the aperture 328 of the shelf member 302 Defined in the bottom of the Female Morse taper 316 is the drive mechanism 312.



FIG. 38 shows the bone engagement member 304 with annular engagement flange 318. The annular engagement flange 318 is positioned on the convex upper surface 320 of the annular shelf member 302. The shelf member 302 defines an annular engagement groove adjacent the aperture which annularly supports the male Morse taper of the bone engaging member 304.



FIGS. 39a, 39b, and 39c represents the implantation of a fixation member. Once the surface of the resected head 36 of the humerus 38 has been resected, the shelf member 302 positioned adjacent to the resected head 36. The bone engagement member 304 is inserted into the guide hole 90. It is envisioned that the bone engagement member 302 can be forced into the guide hole 90 to displace the bone material around the intramedullary canal.


Once the bone engagement member 302 has been inserted into the guide hole 90, the bone engagement member 302 is rotated until the annular engagement flange 318 engages the upper surface 320 of the annular shelf member 302. Optional screws 85 are disposed through the holes 324 to couple the base member 302 to the humerus 38. At this point, a surgeon may use any number of test head portions and/or adapter portions to determine the proper size needed to mate with the glenoid component. Once a proper head member size has been determined, the final head member 330 can be fixed to the head engagement portion 306 of the bone engaging member 302.



FIG. 40 represents a humeral implant 400 according to another embodiment. Shown is a coupling member 402 and a humeral head 403. The coupling member 402 has a generally cylindrical body portion 404 with an exterior coupling surface 406. The coupling surface 406 can be tapered or can be cylindrical. The exterior coupling surface 406 further has at least one bone engaging thread 407 which is configured to couple the cylindrical body portion to a hole defined within the receptive humerous as previously described. Appended to the proximal end 408 of the body portion 404 is a pair of linearly aligned coupling flanges 410 and 412, which define a pair of fastening member coupling apertures 414. The body portion 404 defines a female Morse taper 416 which is used to couple the head 403 to the coupling member 402. The coupling member 402 is configured to allow the fixation of the head without relying on the head seating on the resection for stability.


The head portion 403 is shown with an axially centered fixation stem 418. It is envisioned the stem 418 can take the form of an offset male Morse taper as is shown in FIGS. 17-22. Additionally, the head has an exterior articulation surface 405 which is configured to articulate with a natural or prosthetic glenoid (not shown).



FIGS. 41 and 42 represent side views of the prosthetic shown in FIG. 40. The coupling flanges 410 and 412 have a coupling surface 420 which is configured to be mated to a resected humerus 422. As shown in FIGS. 44 and 45, the resected humerus 422 can be prepared as previously described to have a flat 424 or convex surface 426. The body 404 is inserted into a hole within the resected humerus 422. In this regard, the body 404 is rotated in a hole formed in the resected humerus to engage the threads with the humeral head and neck bone.


A pair of fasteners 434 are positioned through the coupling apertures 414 in the coupling flanges 410 and 412. As seen in FIGS. 43 and 45, a coupling surface 420 of the flanges 410 and 412 can have a predefined concave coupling surface. Additionally, the concave surface can be formed by a physician bending the flanges 410 and 412 in the operating room prior to the insertion of the coupling fasteners 434 into the apertures 414.


After the coupling member 402 is inserted into the humerus, a trialing head 60′ is optionally used to determine the proper size and orientation of the humeral head 403. The humeral head 403 is then coupled to the coupling member as previously described.


The description of the invention is merely exemplary embodiments in the present invention. One skilled in the art would readily recognize from such discussion and from accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications, variations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for implanting a humeral component during shoulder arthroplasty, the method comprising: reaming at least a portion of a head of a humerus to form a reamed convex surface on the head of the humerus;preparing a hole in the head of the humerus;providing a fixation component having a plurality of coupling flanges that define a plurality of bone screw holes and a generally cylindrical fixation member extending from a shelf;implanting the fixation component onto the humerus by inserting the fixation member into the hole prepared in the humerus; bending the coupling flanges, in one of a hospital, a surgical center, or medical facility, to match a shape of the reamed convex surface such that, the plurality of coupling flanges rest against the reamed convex surface the head of the humerus;inserting at least one bone screw in at least one of the plurality of bone screw holes defined by the coupling flanges such that the at least one bone screw adheres to bone;providing a head member having a first articulating surface and a second fixation surface opposite the first articulating surface; andsecuring the head member to the fixation component.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein securing the head member to the fixation component includes attaching the head member to the fixation component by way of a locking taper.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fixation member defines a bone engaging thread.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising rotatably adjusting the head member relative to the fixation component by way of a coupling member.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of coupling flanges are independently articulable from one another.
  • 6. A method for implanting a humeral component during shoulder arthroplasty, the method comprising: reaming a spherical surface of a head of a humerus to form a reamed convex surface on the head of the humerus;preparing a hole in the head of the humerus;implanting a fixation component onto the humerus by inserting a fixation member of the fixation component into the hole prepared in the humerus; bending a coupling flange of the fixation component in one of a hospital, a surgical center, or medical facility to match a shape of the reamed convex surface such that the coupling flange rests against and conforms to the reamed convex surface the head of the humerus;inserting a bone screw into defined by the coupling flange of the fixation component such that the bone screw adheres to bone; andsecuring a head member to the fixation component, the head member having an articulating surface and a fixation surface opposite the articulating surface.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein securing the head member to the fixation component includes attaching the head member to the fixation component by way of a locking taper.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the fixation member defines a bone engaging thread, andwherein implanting the fixation component into the humerus includes rotating the fixation component to screw the fixation component into the head of the humerus using the bone engaging thread.
  • 9. A method for implanting a humeral component during shoulder arthroplasty, the method comprising: reaming at least a portion of a head of a humerus to form a reamed convex surface on the head of the humerus;preparing a hole in the head of the humerus;providing a fixation component having a plurality of coupling flanges that define a plurality of bone screw holes and a generally cylindrical fixation member extending from a shelf;implanting the fixation component onto the humerus by inserting the fixation member into the hole prepared in the humerus,bending, in one of a hospital, surgical center, or medical facility, the coupling flanges to match a shape of the reamed convex surface on the head of the humerusinserting at least one bone screw in at least one of the plurality of bone screw holes defined by the coupling flanges such that the at least one bone screw adheres to bone;providing a head member having a first articulating surface and a second fixation surface opposite the first articulating surface; andsecuring the head member to the fixation component.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein securing the head member to the fixation component includes attaching the head member to the fixation component by way of a locking taper.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the fixation member defines a bone engaging thread.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, further comprising rotatably adjusting the head member relative to the fixation component by way of a coupling member.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/225,645 filed on Sep. 13, 2005, and issued Jun. 17, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,753,402, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/930,044 filed on Aug. 30, 2004 and issued Nov. 27, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,317,871, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/205,386 filed Jul. 25, 2002 and issued Aug. 31, 2004 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,783,549, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/308,340, filed on Jul. 27, 2001. The disclosure of the above applications is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (56)
Number Name Date Kind
3938198 Kahn Feb 1976 A
4042980 Swanson et al. Aug 1977 A
4129903 Huggler Dec 1978 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4608053 Keller Aug 1986 A
4662891 Noiles May 1987 A
4731088 Collier Mar 1988 A
4846839 Noiles Jul 1989 A
4846840 Leclercq et al. Jul 1989 A
4883491 Mallory et al. Nov 1989 A
4919670 Dale et al. Apr 1990 A
4964865 Burkhead et al. Oct 1990 A
5092892 Ashby Mar 1992 A
5222984 Forte Jun 1993 A
5314479 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5472444 Huebner et al. Dec 1995 A
5489309 Lackey et al. Feb 1996 A
5507818 McLaughlin Apr 1996 A
5571203 Masini Nov 1996 A
5800551 Williamson et al. Sep 1998 A
5928285 Bigliani et al. Jul 1999 A
5976144 Fishbein et al. Nov 1999 A
6045581 Burkinshaw Apr 2000 A
6146423 Cohen et al. Nov 2000 A
6197063 Dews Mar 2001 B1
6228120 Leonard et al. May 2001 B1
6364910 Shultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368353 Arcand Apr 2002 B1
6383226 Carter May 2002 B1
6494913 Huebner Dec 2002 B1
6508840 Rockwood, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6673114 Hartdegen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6676705 Wolf Jan 2004 B1
6736852 Callaway et al. May 2004 B2
6783549 Stone et al. Aug 2004 B1
7241315 Evans Jul 2007 B2
8317871 Stone et al. Nov 2012 B2
8753402 Winslow et al. Jun 2014 B2
20010047210 Wolf Nov 2001 A1
20010053935 Hartdegen et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020016634 Maroney et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020022889 Chibrac et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020099445 Maroney et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120339 Callaway et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030028253 Stone et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055507 McDevitt et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030100952 Rockwood et al. May 2003 A1
20030125810 Sullivan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030158605 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20040034431 Maroney et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040220673 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20050004675 Shultz et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050107882 Stone et al. May 2005 A1
20060004460 Engh et al. Jan 2006 A1
20120109321 Stone et al. May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
1591084 Nov 2005 EP
1598034 Nov 2005 EP
1762191 Mar 2007 EP
2578739 Sep 1986 FR
2578739 Sep 1986 FR
2579454 Oct 1986 FR
2579454 Oct 1986 FR
2704747 Nov 1994 FR
2704747 Nov 1994 FR
WO-0167988 Sep 2001 WO
WO-2001067988 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0217822 Mar 2002 WO
WO-200217822 Mar 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (78)
Entry
Copeland Shoulder—Report producted by Biomet & Merck.
European Application Search Report EP06254732 dated Mar. 5, 2009 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, filed Sep. 13, 2005.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jan. 21, 2009.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jan. 9, 2008.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jun. 16, 2011.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, dated Mar. 12, 2010.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645 dated Jul. 30, 2009.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645 dated Sep. 10, 2010.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jul. 6, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jun. 15, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Jun. 24, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044 dated Oct. 25, 2011.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645 dated Feb. 5, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645 dated Mar. 11, 2010.
O Levy, et al., “Cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Shoulder,” the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 83-B, No. 23, Mar. 2001, pp. 213-221.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2003”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 21, 2004”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2003”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Response filed Mar. 24, 2004 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2003”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Response filed Jul. 17, 2003 to Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 12, 2003”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Response filed Nov. 7, 2003 to Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2003”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Suppmental Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 3, 2003”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,044, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jan. 4, 2012”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,044, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Notice of Allowance filed Jul. 20, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Apr. 9, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Apr. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2009”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Jun. 14, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2010”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Sep. 1, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2011”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Oct. 6, 2009 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2009”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Oct. 15, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2007”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Oct. 24, 2008 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2008”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Response filed Dec. 28, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2011”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, 312 Amendment filed Apr. 30, 2014”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, 312 Amendment filed May 20, 2014”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 31, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed May 23, 2014”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Response filed May 5, 2009 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Response filed Jun. 11, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2010”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Response filed Aug. 5, 2008 to Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 9, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Response filed Oct. 30, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Response filed Dec. 10, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2010”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 9, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/225,645, Supplemental Response to Restriction Requirement filed Oct. 31, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Advisory Action dated Aug. 8, 2013”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Advisory Action dated Oct. 9, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Preliminary Amendment filed May 29, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Jan. 19, 2015 Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed May 13, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2014”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Jul. 30, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2013”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Nov. 16, 2012 to Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 17, 2012”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 17, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06254732.8, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) dated Oct. 28, 2009”, 1 pg.
“European Application Serial No. 06254732.8, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) dated Nov. 18, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06254732.8, Response filed Apr. 30, 2010 to Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 5, 2009”, 56 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06254732.8, Response filed May 28, 2014 to Examination Notification Art. 94(3) dated Nov. 18, 2013”, 13 pgs.
Levy, O, et al., “Cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Shoulder”, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 83B(2), (Mar. 2001), 213-221.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2003”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 3, 2003”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 21, 2002”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Response filed Jul. 14, 2003 to Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 12, 2003”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/205,386, Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 12, 2003”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jan. 4, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/930,044, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Jul. 26, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2017”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 23, 2016”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2016”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Jan. 6, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2016”, 9 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 16201164.7, Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2018”, 8 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 16201164.7, Response filed Dec. 27, 2017 to Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 ”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Examiner Interview Summary”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,106, Response filed Oct. 17, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2017”, 14 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140296988 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60308340 Jul 2001 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11225645 Sep 2005 US
Child 14305638 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10930044 Aug 2004 US
Child 11225645 US
Parent 10205386 Jul 2002 US
Child 10930044 US