The present invention relates generally to the field of climbing equipment, and more particularly to a modular hunting ladder.
In the hunting industry, the average age of the hunter is increasing. The passion for hunting of this generation is not on the decline, and there is increasing concern about the declining physical abilities of hunters and for safety while hunting from an elevated platform. There are numerous hunting ladders that attempt to provide safe elevated platforms with an integral ladder for climbing. Conventional hunting ladders require a tree, utility pole or some other vertical column for support, as compared to freestanding tri-pods.
Some hunting ladders utilize a single metal tube (square or rectangular) for the column, which creates a major concern regarding the strength-to-weight ratio of the unit. Certainly the single column could be sized to facilitate a clear span from the ground to the point where the ladder connects to the tree, but then the unit becomes too heavy to be transported easily. As a result, it has become somewhat “standard” in the industry to add a brace from the mid-span of the ladder to a point on the tree to prevent the ladder column from collapsing as the user ascends. This makes the set-up of the unit more difficult because the user must adjust the brace for each particular tree diameter. Furthermore, as the user ascends the ladder above the brace connection point, the ladder has a tendency to “kick-out” at the bottom before the top can be securely attached to the tree. Therefore, this brace only adds to the complexity and cost of the system.
Other hunting ladders utilize a square or rectangular tube that incorporates an internal or external splice component, which allows adjacent sections to be connected. Such a design has several disadvantages. First, in order to make the adjacent sections relatively easy to assemble and disassemble, there must be a certain amount of clearance between the mating of male/female components. This clearance results in a non-stable, non-integral column after assembly. As this clearance is reduced, the unit becomes much more difficult to assemble and disassemble. Add to this the requirement that the mating sections be held perfectly parallel during the assembly process, and the task can become time consuming and frustrating.
By using an internal or external splice component to connect adjacent ladder sections without bolting the sections together, it is common to have separation of the ladder sections after assembly at the tree. Since most of these units are installed in late summer and early fall, the ground is usually dry and very firm. After the installer securely attaches the top of the ladder to the tree, it cannot move down the tree. Later in the year during hunting season, which is normally October through January, soil conditions are typically wet. As the user ascends the ladder, the bottom section can sink into the wet, softened soil, but the top section cannot move down the tree because it is securely attached to the tree. Consequently, the sections can separate, causing a catastrophic failure of the ladder column.
Some have attempted to address these shortcomings by fabricating a modular ladder column wherein each sidepiece of the ladder section has a pair of parallel square tubes connected together by a continuous W-W wire-form welded to the tubes. However, in such a design, adjacent sections are connected together with four sleeves, one sleeve for each of the four square tubes. While this design is structurally superior to the single-tube column design, it does not eliminate the tube-in-tube or tube-over-tube section jointing technique. Moreover, the four square tubes and the four sleeves must be held in perfect alignment for the adjacent sections to mate together, which adds to the difficultly of the assembly. Additionally, this is a terribly inefficient method to manufacture the column.
Steel tube fabrication has also proven inadequate because it is difficult to provide permanent non-skid ridges onto the ladder rungs for safety while climbing. Mud, snow and even water can cause the ladder rungs of most ladders to be dangerously slippery if the manufacturer does not add traction enhancing devices, such as adhesive-backed sandpaper or a metal strip with raised features to resist slipping.
Thus, it has been found that a need yet exists for an improved hunting ladder for attachment to a tree or pole, which ladder is safe in use, convenient, lightweight, easy-to-use, and easy to assemble. It is to the provision of such an improved hunting ladder meeting these and other needs that the present invention is primarily directed.
Briefly described, in an illustrative form the present invention comprises a hunting ladder for attachment to a tree or pole. The hunting ladder includes a plurality of ladder sections that can be assembled together to form a rigid structure. Each of the ladder sections includes side rails and rungs extending between the side rails. The side rails comprise elongate structural beams. Further, external side bolsters are adapted to be mounted to the inside or outside of adjacent ladder sections to couple the ladder sections together. The external side bolsters are shaped to match and closely abut the structural beams. Fasteners, extendable through the side bolsters and the structural beams, can be used to allow the adjacent ladder sections to be coupled together and uncoupled, as desired.
Preferably, a seat is attached to an upper portion of the ladder without requiring attachment of the seat to the tree or pole. Also preferably, the external side bolsters are removably attached to each of the adjacent ladder sections, or the external side bolsters are permanently or semi-permanently attached to one of the adjacent ladder sections and removably attached to the other adjacent ladder section.
In another form, the present invention comprises a modular hunting ladder for attachment to a tree or pole including at least two ladder sections that can be connected together to form a rigid structure. Each of the ladder sections includes two generally parallel side rails with rungs extending therebetween. The first ladder section has a seat attached only to the first ladder section. Preferably, the modular hunting ladder also comprises a platform secured only to the first ladder section for attachment to the tree or pole. Also preferably, the platform is attached to the first ladder section at point between the seat and a rung of the first ladder section.
The present invention provides a hunting ladder which is simple in construction, durable in use, inexpensive to manufacture, and easily transportable. The present invention also is easy to use, reliable, and safe and also can be assembled and disassembled quickly and easily.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading the following specification in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures.
Referring now to the drawing figures, in which like reference numbers refer to like parts throughout the several views, preferred forms of the present invention will now be described by way of example embodiments. It is to be understood that the embodiments described and depicted herein are only selected examples of the many and various forms that the present invention may take, and that these examples are not intended to be exhaustive or limiting of the claimed invention. Also, as used in the specification including the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” or “approximately” one particular value and/or to “about” or “approximately” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. Moreover, when describing the attachment of the ladder to a “tree” in the appended claims, it will be understood that this term “tree” encompasses poles as well as actual trees.
As shown in
Each ladder section 12, 13, and 14 has side rails 15 and 16. Preferably, the side rails 15 and 16 are elongate structural beams. In one embodiment, the side rails 15 and 16 are double box I-beams having two box sections 17 and 18 and a web 19 extending therebetween. A cross-sectional view of the rail 15 having two box sections 17 and 18 and a web 19 extending therebetween is depicted in
Rungs 22 extend between the side rails 15 and 16. The rungs 22 each are broad enough to accommodate both feet of a user standing thereon at one time. In one embodiment, the rungs 22 are parallelogram-shaped such that their top surfaces 24 are generally parallel with the ground when the ladder is mounted to a tree. Preferably, each rung 22 has a top surface 24 which is oriented at an acute angle relative to the side rails 15 and 16. More preferably, the top surface 24 of each rung 22 is oriented at an angle of about 70° relative to the side rails 15 and 16. Alternatively, other shapes and orientations for the rungs 22 could be employed, as desired.
Preferably, the side rails 15 and 16 and the rungs 22 are made of extruded material. Preferably, the side rails 15 and 16 and the rungs 22 are all made from aluminum or other durable, lightweight material. Both the side rails 15 and 16 and the rungs 22 can be hollow. The thickness of the walls of the side rails 15 and 16 and the rungs 22 can be optimized to reduce the weight of the side rails and the rungs to a minimum while maximizing the strength of the ladder 10.
Preferably, the top surfaces 23 and the bottom surfaces 24 of the rungs 22 have ridges 25 formed thereon for minimizing foot slippage, as best seen in
As shown in
In the exemplary embodiment depicted, the external side bolsters 26 and 28 contact only the outer portions of the side rails 15 and 16. Thus, the external side bolsters 26 and 28 and the side rails 15 and 16 can mate together with a precision fit while being fully capable of withstanding bending moments experienced by the hunting ladder 10 induced in the areas where adjacent ladder sections are connected.
Below is a description relating to the external side bolster 28 for coupling the side rail 16A of the first ladder section 12 to the side rail 16B of the second ladder section 13. It will be understood that the third ladder section 14 is coupled to the second ladder section 13 with an identical external side bolster 28. Moreover, external side bolsters 26 are identical to external side bolsters 28, only their orientation on the hunting ladder 10 differs.
The external side bolster 28 has an opening 34 therethrough for insertion of a fastener 32. The fastener 32 permits adjacent ladder sections to be coupled together and uncoupled, as desired. Preferably, the fastener 32 is a carriage bolt and the opening 34 through the side bolster 28 is square-shaped. The fastener 32 couples the first ladder section 12 to the second ladder section 13 by extending through the opening 34 of the side bolster 28 and through an opening 36 of the side rail 16. To attach the fastener 32 to the side bolster 28 and the ladder section 12, a threaded hand knob 38 is used in combination with the fastener 32.
The external bolster 28 can be removably attached to the adjacent ladder sections 12 and 13. Alternatively, the external side bolster 28 can be permanently attached, such as by welding, or semi-permanently attached, such as with a bolt and locknut, or mounted to one ladder section, for example ladder section 12, and removably attached or mounted to another ladder section, for example ladder section 13, in a manner described above.
As shown in
The U-shaped platform frame 131 includes two portions which lie adjacent the plane of the platform assembly 113, namely portions 133 and 134. Moreover, the U-shaped platform frame 131 also includes two support posts 136 and 137 for supporting the platform 113 adjacent the hunting ladder 10. As best seen in
A generally V-shaped yoke 142 is positioned beneath the U-shaped vertical frame 141, is welded thereto, and faces away from the platform assembly 113. The yoke 142 is adapted for at least partly straddling the tree and will be described in more detail below.
The frame components just described can be made from 18 gauge steel tubing, 13/16 inches square (or other materials). The individual pieces thereof can be welded together and then powder coated (painted) to avoid corrosion.
Referring again to the generally V-shaped yoke 142 of
The rigid platform structure 110 is firmly secured to the tree using a pair of flexible crossing straps 150 and 152 attached to the hunting ladder 10. Preferably, the straps 150 and 152 attach to a rung 22 of the bottom ladder section 14 in the vicinity of regions 154 and 155. The straps 150 and 152 can be permanently attached to the bottom ladder section 14, or the straps can be removably attached to the bottom ladder section 14. As the user ascends the ladder, the user crosses the straps around the backside of the tree and attaches them to a rung 22 of the top ladder section 12 in the vicinity of regions 156 and 157, which is located generally below the platform structure 110. Preferably, the straps 150 and 152 comprise a length of nylon webbing. Alternatively, other types of flexible mounting elements could be employed. Those skilled in the art will also recognize that a cable, chain, rope, belt or other flexible mounting element could be employed as desired.
As also shown in
The frame assembly 162 includes a transverse intermediate portion 168 and arm portions 170 and 172. The arm portions 170 and 172 can function as handrails to be used by the user while standing and turning around on the standing platform 110. The distal ends of the arm portions 170 and 172 curve generally downwardly to engage a proximal end of the first ladder section 12. The arm portions 170 and 172 are secured to the hunting ladder 10 in the vicinity of regions 174 and 176. A pair of support arms 178 and 180 is secured to the arm portions 170 and 172 in the vicinities of 174 and 182 and 176 and 184.
The seat bottom 164 is suspended from the arm portions 170 and 172 by two pieces of webbing, webbing 186 and webbing 188. The webbings 186 and 188 are attached loosely to the underside of the seat bottom 164 by being threaded through an opening formed between strappings sewn to the underside of the seat bottom 164. Each of the webbings 186 and 188 has a loop sewn at each of its ends and acts as a sling to support the padded seat bottom 164. Thus, as depicted in the figures, the frame assembly 162 is cantilevered from a proximal end of the hunting ladder 10, which provides a tree seat 160 suspended from the frame assembly without the need to attach the seat frame assembly to the tree.
The seat bottom 164 and the upright seat back 166 include inner padding material covered with fabric, such as camouflage fabric. Moreover, the seat bottom 164 and the upright seat back 166 are made from two separate pieces of padding, which are covered with a single sewn-on cover so that the seat bottom and the seat back are connected to each other flexibly.
While the invention has been shown and described in preferred forms, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications, additions, and deletions can be made therein. These and other changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
591418 | Noyes | Oct 1897 | A |
1005032 | Hennessee | Oct 1911 | A |
1231037 | McGaffee | Jun 1917 | A |
2296336 | Crozier | Sep 1942 | A |
2552630 | Hutchinson | May 1951 | A |
2810504 | Pula | Oct 1957 | A |
3598201 | Thurmond | Aug 1971 | A |
3703939 | Maxwell | Nov 1972 | A |
3961688 | Starkey | Jun 1976 | A |
4069892 | Lynne et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4258828 | Evans | Mar 1981 | A |
4261436 | Stillman, Jr. | Apr 1981 | A |
4411335 | Forrester | Oct 1983 | A |
4422527 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4552246 | Thomas | Nov 1985 | A |
4674597 | Humphrey | Jun 1987 | A |
4844207 | Andrews et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4892170 | O'Donnell | Jan 1990 | A |
4953662 | Porter | Sep 1990 | A |
5040635 | Strickland | Aug 1991 | A |
5080193 | Woof | Jan 1992 | A |
5086873 | George | Feb 1992 | A |
5109954 | Skyba | May 1992 | A |
5275257 | Robertson | Jan 1994 | A |
5277273 | Grimes | Jan 1994 | A |
5439072 | Jenkins, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
D394715 | Pearson | May 1998 | S |
5752580 | Jenkins, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5816362 | Jenkins, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
D417011 | Woller, Sr. et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
D420147 | Woller, Sr. et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6053278 | Myers | Apr 2000 | A |
6170609 | Dech | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6334508 | Shields | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20020112919 | Graham, Jr. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020166727 | Cramer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2620164 | Mar 1989 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050178615 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |