Patent Grant
7753960
1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates generally to an implantable article that is particularly suitable for use as an artificial joint prosthesis and more particularly to a prosthesis shaving in part a tray that is supported by metaphyseal bone, such as the tibial component of a knee prosthesis.
2. Description of the Related Art
Artificial knee joint prostheses are widely used today, restoring mobility to patients affected by a variety of conditions, particularly arthritis. The satisfactory performance of these devices can be affected not only by the design of the prosthesis itself, but also by the final placement and spatial orientation of the implanted components both individually and together in combination. Improper placement or orientation of one or more components of the device or an improper fit to the patient's anatomy can adversely affect the goal of satisfactorily restoring the clinical biomechanics and function of the joint.
There are several general types of total knee joint replacement prostheses, including fixed bearing, mobile bearing, and rotating platform, in both hinged and semi-constrained designs. The primary difference between the fixed bearing designs and the mobile bearing and rotating platform designs is that the mobile bearing and rotating platform designs uncouple, to some degree, the motion of the tibial tray from the motion of the component that articulates with the femoral component. In a typical rotating platform design, for instance, the plastic articular component is free to rotate about an axis that is roughly parallel to the long axis of the tibia, while the tibial tray remains stationary relative to the tibia.
The positioning of the device, including the rotational alignment of the tibial component relative to the femoral component, affects the biomechanics of the joint. The proper rotational alignment of the tray on the tibia allows for greater coverage of the metaphyseal bone with more complete bony support of the tray and little or no overhang. The proper rotational alignment of the tibial articular surface with the femoral articular surface allows these components to articulate in the manner for which they were designed, and in this way maximizes the contact area between the articular surfaces, minimizes the contact stresses for a given flexion angle and joint load, and thus minimizes wear of the articular surfaces. While rotating platform and mobile bearing designs can provide this de-coupling of the tibial tray and articular surface alignments, these designs employ an additional articulation between the plastic tibial articular component and the supporting metal tray that is a potential source for material wear. It is therefore desirable to provide a component that de-couples the rotational alignment of the tray to the proximal tibia from the alignment of the tibial bearing component to the femoral component, thus allowing for both optimal articulation and secure engagement to be achieved, independent of each other, without the additional metal-to-plastic articulation that is incumbent to mobile bearing and rotating platform designs.
It is an aspect of the present general inventive concept to provide a component designed to allow for tibial component articular surface rotational alignment that can be set independent of the rotational position of the tibial portion that is in direct contact with the tibia.
The above aspects can be attained by a joint prosthesis that includes (a) a tibial tray member so sized and shaped as to replace the proximal end of the tibia, and having (b) a bore with internal size and shape so as to receive the coupler member; (c) a tibial base member, having (d) a distal surface so shaped as to interface with the proximal surface of the tibial tray member; (e) a proximal geometry so shaped as to attach to the tibial articular member; and (f) a bore with internal size and shape so as to receive the coupler member; (g) a tibial articular member, having (h) a proximal surface so sized and shaped as to articulate with the femoral member; (i) a distal surface so sized and shaped as to attach to the tibial base member; and (j) an opening or other mechanism by which assembly of the coupler member to the tibial base member and tibial tray member is enabled; (k) a coupler member, having (l) a distal mating portion so sized and shaped as to be received inside the bore in the tibial tray member, (m) a proximal mating portion so sized and shaped as to be received inside the bore in the tibial base member; (n) a femoral member so sized and shaped as to replace the distal end of the femur, and having an outer surface so sized and shaped as to articulate with the tibial articular member.
These together with other aspects and advantages which will be subsequently apparent, reside in the details of construction and operation as more fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
Further features and advantages of the present inventive concept, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present inventive concept, will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the inventive concept, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
The present inventive concept is related to the tibial component of a knee replacement prosthesis for both cemented and cementless applications; however the inventive concept is also applicable to other implantable prostheses such as ankles, fingers, and elbows, all of which may include a tray portion for resurfacing one or both sides of a joint. The present inventive concept is particularly advantageous in allowing optimal sizing and placement for use in an artificial knee and as such this description will reference a knee prosthesis.
The components that comprise these devices are designed such that assembly of the components can be accomplished either before implantation, such as on the back table during surgery, or, alternatively the assembly can be accomplished in a successive fashion, assembling each portion independently during implantation to maximize the benefits of independent positioning of the individual sub-components of the device in the joint. The tibial component articular portion can be fixedly set in place, or it can be left free to rotate after implantation, employing metal-on-metal bearing surfaces for the rotational motion.
The present inventive concept can be achieved by de-coupling the tibial tray and tibial bearing portions, resulting in two or more distinct pieces. The tibial articular portion articulates with the femoral portion that is in direct contact with the femur to provide functional replacement of the knee joint. The tibial base portion supports this tibial articular portion, and the tibial tray portion in turn supports the tibial base portion. The tibial tray portion is in direct contact with the proximal tibia. The tibial articular portion and tibial base portion may be preassembled during manufacture or may be removably attached by the user (surgeon), forming the tibial bearing portion. The user, to allow rotational alignment of the articular portion independent from and relative to the tray portion, may combine the tibial bearing portion with the tibial tray portion. This achieves additional variable positioning independent of that achieved after insertion of the tray portion. In one embodiment, the tibial bearing portion can be locked to the tray portion within a range of rotational positions to achieve the desired rotational alignment with the femoral component. In another embodiment, the tibial bearing portion is free to rotate on the tibial tray portion after assembly. By varying bearing portion configurations a variety of clinical needs and situations can be addressed, such as adding thickness to the bearing portion for proper soft tissue tensioning. Sizes of the tray portion and the femoral portion can also be independently selected, for proper fitment to the tibia and femur respectively, while maintaining a size match between the tibial articular portion and the femoral portion. Many different clinical situations can be addressed by simply using the appropriate combination of tibial tray, base, and articular portions, and femoral portions.
A cylindrical press-fit coupling mechanism between the tibial base portion and the tibial tray portion provides a reproducible strength and geometry of assembly between the two portions; this coupling mechanism only requires axial translation of the coupling mechanism, where full assembly is defined by seating of the base portion to the tray portion, which could not be achieved with the use of a tapered coupling mechanism. The coupling mechanism itself is either integral to the base portion or is accomplished with a separate portion that couples to the base and tray portions. Provided the coupling mechanism is fully assembled, the resulting strength of assembly and the axial position of the base portion relative to the tray portion are dependent on the design and manufacturing tolerances, and are not dependent on the magnitude of force applied during assembly, unlike tapered and/or threaded coupling mechanism.
Due to the extent of options available, and the desire for a system approach in addressing a multitude of clinical situations with limited components, a connection mechanism between the components is simplified and common amongst the components resulting in a reliable, more cost effective, and user friendly mechanism to secure the components either prior to, immediately prior to, or during implantation.
As shown in
The distal portion of the tibial tray may include one or more stems (10), ribs (11), pegs or other geometric or surface features for stabilization in the tibia. Centrally located on the proximal end of the tray is a bore (7) with a central axis that is oriented normal to the proximal surface (5) of the tray. The bore (7) may include threads or other feature (12) for engaging a screw, bolt, rod, or similar, which may be removably engaged to the tray portion (1). Such rod, or similar, may be used as part of an assembly device, to apply an assembly force to the tray while such device applies an opposite force to the bearing portion, to forcibly assemble the bearing portion into the tray. The bore (7) may also serve as a mechanism of removing the tray from the bone in which the tray is implanted using a suitable instrument that removably engages the tray.
The base portion (2) is independent of the tray portion (1) and assembled and joined to the tray portion by the user (typically the surgeon). This modular feature is what allows the user additional flexibility in final knee replacement configuration. By de-coupling tray placement from the articular surface orientation, substantially more flexibility is allowed and the ability to address internal or external rotational mal-alignment becomes available. In addition, optimal sizing (including thickness, width, and breadth) may be achieved by choosing the appropriate articular and base portions to use with the chosen tray portion. The base portion (2) includes a male spigot (8) that inserts in a co-axial manner into the bore (7) in the tray portion (1). The proximal surface (5) of the tray portion and the distal surface (6) of the base portion have mutually conforming surfaces that come into direct contact upon assembly of the base portion to the tray portion.
Final locking of the base portion (2) to the tray portion (1) is obtained by the male spigot (8) of the base portion (2) locking within the corresponding bore (7) of the tray portion (1). One or more zones of diametrical interference between the spigot (8) and bore (7) achieve this locking. In the zone of diametrical interference on the spigot (13) and the corresponding zone of diametrical interference on the bore (14), the engaging surfaces of the spigot and bore are cylindrical. To obtain the interference fit between the spigot and bore at these zones (13 and 14), the outside diameter of the spigot exceeds the inside diameter of the bore, which defines the diametrical interference. The diametrical interference between the spigot and the bore is critical to proper functioning of the device, and may be in the range of 0.0005″ to 0.0035″. The preferred embodiment utilizes a nominal diametrical interference of 0.0020″. The length of the zone of diametrical interference may be limited to approximately 0.02″ to 0.10″ to provide adequate rotational resistance of the base portion within the tray portion, while maintaining reasonable assembly forces by controlling the amount of interference, the length of the zone and the axial location of the zone(s). In the preferred embodiment, both the spigot (8) and bore (7) incorporate gradual tapers and/or rounds at the surfaces leading into the zones of diametrical interference so as to avoid plowing of one or more surfaces during assembly, and thus ease assembly of the base portion to the tray portion. The total length of the spigot (8) and the location of the cylindrical zone with diametrical interference (13 and 14 of the spigot and bore, respectively) is not critical, it only requires a length and location to ensure a suitable locking surface with adequate axial and torsional engagement. It has been determined that an axial length of diametrical interference of approximately 0.08″ and a total length of the spigot (8) of 0.3″ are satisfactory for the tibial component of a knee replacement.
The tibial articular portion (3) and tibial base portion (2) may be distinct modular components that are assembled by the user prior to implantation, or assembled by the user during implantation. One or more of a variety of a locking mechanism (15 and 16) may be utilized to fixedly combine the articular portion and the base portion. Alternatively assembly of the two portions into a single portion may effectively combine these two portions into a single portion during manufacture, or by replacing the two portions with a single portion that provides the same functionality as the two portions in combination. The tibial articular portion and tibial base portion together comprise the tibial bearing portion.
The tibial base portion (2) and tibial articular portion (3) may include through holes (17 and 18) coaxial to the spigot (8). These through holes (17 and 18) may include threads or other mechanisms for removable engagement of a bolt, rod, or plug, together or separately and for various purposes. A bolt or rod could provide a mechanism of removing the base portion from the tray portion, or removing the assembled construct from the bone. A plug could be used to close the hole and keep the internal surfaces clean. The through holes (17 and 18) could also be used to enable a rod to pass through the base portion (2) and articular portion (3), said rod removably engaging the tray portion (1) at the hole (12), as part of a device to forcibly assemble the base portion into the tray portion. Alternatively, a bolt or other fastener could further secure the tibial bearing portion to the tray portion.
In another embodiment of the present inventive concept, shown in
In another embodiment of the present inventive concept, shown in
In another embodiment of the present inventive concept, a slip-fit engagement, with line-to-line fit or a small diametrical clearance in place of the diametrical interference, allows rotational motion of the tibial base portion (2) relative to the tibial tray portion (1) after assembly and during functional service. In the embodiment shown in
The modular tibial base portion (2) and tibial articular portion (3) allow one to utilize various bearing configurations with the same tray portion (1) allowing for multiple options for each and every tray. Variations of articular portions (3) can include but not limited to different thickness articular portions, alternative materials or material processing, and various articular geometries. Articular geometries may include additional features for engaging the femoral component, such as a post as part of a posterior stabilized design. The coupler portion (19), as an additional function, may form all or part of such a feature. When variations of femoral and/or patellar portions are included the design options multiply significantly with very little increase in number of individual sub-components. Femoral component options may include, but are not limited to, well known unconstrained, semi-constrained, posterior stabilized, and hinged designs, with appropriate mating tibial articular portions.
The tibial tray (1), base (2), and articular (3) portions, and the femoral (4) and patellar portions of this device, can be fabricated from any suitable high strength biocompatible materials. Suitable materials include any of the titanium alloys, cobalt alloys, or stainless steel alloys. Preferred examples include cobalt chromium alloys for the tibial tray and base portions, and for the femoral portion, and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene for the tibial articular portion and the patellar portion. The polyethylene articular portion can be machined from prefabricated stock material, or it can be compression molded from polyethylene powder as a separate unit, and assembled to the tibial base during manufacturer or by the user. Alternatively, the polyethylene can be directly compression molded into the tibial base portion forming an integral unit at the time of manufacturer. The distal geometry and surface properties of the tray portion can be any of a variety appropriate for interfacing with the recipient bone for cemented or cementless fixation. The geometry and surface properties of the femoral portion (4) on the generally concave surface can be any of a variety appropriate for interfacing with the recipient bone for cemented or cementless fixation.
Although the present inventive concept and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventive concept as defined by the appended claims. This could include such changes so as to apply the inventive concept to other joints besides the knee joint.
The present application claims benefit of provisional application No. 60/547,627, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3816855 | Saleh | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3868730 | Kaufer et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3869729 | Attenborough | Mar 1975 | A |
| 4016606 | Murray et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4136405 | Pastrick et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4212087 | Mortensen | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4213209 | Insall et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4216549 | Hillberry et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4219893 | Noiles | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4224697 | Murray et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4262368 | Lacey | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4268920 | Engelbrecht et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4301553 | Noiles | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4479271 | Bolesky et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4634444 | Noiles | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4731086 | Whiteside et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4822366 | Bolesky | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4838891 | Branemark et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4865606 | Rehder | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4888021 | Forte et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4936847 | Manginelli | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4938769 | Shaw | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4944756 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4944757 | Martinez et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4950298 | Gustilo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4995883 | Demane et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5007933 | Sidebotham et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5030234 | Pappas et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5047033 | Fallin | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5074879 | Pappas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5080674 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5108452 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5116375 | Hofmann | May 1992 | A |
| 5147405 | Van Zile et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147406 | Houston et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5163961 | Harwin | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5194066 | Van Zile | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197488 | Kovacevic | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5207711 | Caspari et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5236461 | Forte | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5246459 | Elias | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5271747 | Wagner et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5282867 | Mikhail | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5314481 | Bianco | May 1994 | A |
| 5330534 | Herrington et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5358527 | Forte | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5370699 | Hood et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5370701 | Finn | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5395401 | Bahler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405394 | Davidson | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5480443 | Elias | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489311 | Cipolletti | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5507830 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514183 | Epstein et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5549689 | Epstein et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5556433 | Gabriel et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5601567 | Swajger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5653764 | Murphy | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5653765 | McTighe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5658341 | Delfosse | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5683472 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5702480 | Kropf et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5755804 | Schmotzer et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5766257 | Goodman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782921 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5871545 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876459 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879391 | Slamin | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879392 | McMinn | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
| 5941911 | Buechel | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954770 | Schmotzer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957979 | Beckman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964808 | Blaha et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6080195 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6099569 | Keller | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099570 | Livet et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6139581 | Engh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6165223 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6203576 | Afriat et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214052 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6238436 | Lob et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6299648 | Doubler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306172 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319286 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355069 | DeCarlo et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6413279 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440171 | Doubler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6475241 | Pappas | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6485519 | Meyers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6491726 | Pappas | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6589283 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6616697 | Sotereanos | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6620198 | Burstein et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6660039 | Evans et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6702822 | Noiles et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6702854 | Cheal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6719800 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6755864 | Brack et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6773461 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6866683 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7044975 | Cheal et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 20010003803 | Leclercq | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034554 | Pappas | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020103541 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156535 | Pappas | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009231 | Gundlapalli et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009232 | Metzger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055508 | Metzger et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153979 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002767 | Wyss | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054416 | Wyss et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117023 | Gerbec et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162620 | Wyss | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215345 | Perrone et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249467 | Meyers et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050107886 | Crabtree et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192672 | Wyss et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203629 | Cipolletti et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060142867 | Metzger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0679375 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| WO0072784 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO2005034817 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050203629 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60547627 | Feb 2004 | US |
