This application is related to the following applications: (5) U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/675,049, entitled “LIGHT WEIGHT, STRONG, FIRE RETARDANT DUNNAGE PLATFORM BAG AND SYSTEM OF LOADING, DISPENSING AND USING BAG” by Vance L. Seagle et al., filed Feb. 14, 2007, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,689,481; (6) U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/569,655, entitled “A METHOD OF MAKING A DUNNAGE PLATFORM” by Vance L. Seagle et al., filed Sep. 29, 2009; (7) U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/616,625, entitled “LIGHT WEIGHT, STRONG, FIRE RETARDANT DUNNAGE PLATFORM BAG AND SYSTEM OF LOADING, DISPENSING AND USING BAG” by Vance L. Seagle et al., filed Nov. 11, 2009; and (8) U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/024,709, entitled “LIGHT WEIGHT, STRONG, FIRE RETARDANT DUNNAGE PLATFORM BAG AND SYSTEM OF LOADING, DISPENSING AND USING BAG” by Vance L. Seagle et al., filed Feb. 10, 2011. These applications (5)-(8) are herein expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This invention is in the general field of light weight shipping containers that can be disassembled and re-assembled and made at least in part from material that has a polymer core covered by a thermoplastic sheet layer. A shipping container bag that is light weight, strong, made of a fire retardant material and which forms an ultra violet light, weather and dust barrier protects the integrity of the shipping containers. A system and method for supplying, dispensing, positioning, tracking, transporting, forwarding and storing light weight shipping containers based on the shipping container bag is disclosed.
Wooden containers capable of being assembled on wooden palates can be made to suit the shipping load. The wooden container can be reinforced to suit the load, using blocking & bracing. A wooden container of standard dimension 1219 mm (48 inches)×1016 mm (40 inches)×1016 mm (40 inches) typically weighs 158-181 kg (350-400 lb). These wooden containers are neither insulated nor able to absorb appreciable shock. As a result products shipped with wooden containers are more vulnerable to damage en route. The wooden containers are also not washable and thus products shipped using wooden containers can be contaminated in situ. The wooden containers are not knock down, thereby restricting the ability to re-use the wooden container.
Other deleterious factors associated with wooden shipping containers include injuries caused by wood splinters and nails to people who handle the wooden container. Additionally, disposal of the wooden container at the end of its useful life has negative consequences for the environment.
The adoption of International Standardized Phytosanitary Monitoring (ISPM)-15 for wood packaging material (WPM) requires treatment of kiln drying of all wood in shipping containers. The United States in cooperation with Mexico and Canada began enforcement of the ISPM 15 standard on Sep. 16, 2005. The North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO) strategy for enhanced enforcement has been conducted in three phases. Phase 1, Sep. 16, 2005 through Jan. 31, 2006, implemented an informed Compliance via account managers and notices posted in connection with cargo that contains noncompliant WPM. Phase 2, Feb. 1, 2006 through Jul. 4, 2006, introduced rejection of violative containers and pallets through re-exportation from North America. Informed compliance via account managers and notices posted in cargo with other types of non-compliant WPM remained in force. On Jul. 5, 2006, phase 3 enforcement took effect, involving full enforcement on all articles of regulated WPM entering North America. Non-compliant Regulated WPM are not allowed to enter the United States. The adoption of ISPM-15 reflects the growing concern among nations about wood shipping products enabling the importation of wood-boring insects, including the Asian Long horned Beetle, the Asian Cerambycid Beetle, the Pine Wood Nematode, the Pine Wilt Nematode and the Anoplophora Glapripwnnis.
Thus the wooden dunnage platform has become unattractive for the international shipment of products. In addition, the wooden shipping container does not protect the shipment from accidental damage or theft as a result of accidental or intentional damage to the shipping container. The construction of wooden containers allows viewing of the products being shipped, which can allow a thief to target particular products. Any wood furring strips used to seal surfaces or cracks in wooden containers and thereby conceal the identity of the product being shipped must also meet the ISPM-15 requirements.
Food and other perishable produce being shipped can suffer from deleterious storage effects arising as a result of the uncontrolled atmosphere associated with the wooden container. Further, the wooden surface is not a sanitary surface, since it can harbor insects as well as mould and bacteria deposits.
Plastic shipping containers, constructed with plastic are known, see U.S. Pat. No. 3,915,089 to Nania, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,216,608 to Woods et al. These hard shell plastic shipping containers use no wood products and are very strong. However, they are relatively heavy (48″×40″×40″ is typically 45-272 kg (100-600 lb) depending on the container type, e.g., a frame with minimal siding versus a container with structural integrity) and are expensive to manufacture. In general, because one piece molding is employed with plastic shipping containers, they cannot be ‘knocked-down’ or otherwise disassembled prior to return to the shipping point of origin or other appropriate destination. As a result these plastic shipping containers have a 1:1 shipping to return ratio. That is the return of the empty container requires just as much space as the original container shipment with the product.
Some shipping container manufacturers have attempted to produce a more sanitary surface by combining foam with wooden surfaces. These containers still suffer a number of disadvantages including their weight, the presence of wood requiring treatment, and their ease of entry for a thief. Further, coating the wood with foam adds the additional disadvantage that the container cannot be easily knocked down or disassembled for return to the shipping point of origin or other appropriate destination.
Thermoplastic molding is used to create a wide variety of useful articles. In general, the process of thermoplastic molding involves heating a thermoplastic material to its glass transition temperature, at which point the material become pliable, molding the pliable thermoplastic into the shape of a desired article and allowing the article to cool. Once a thermoplastic material cools to a temperature beneath the range of its glass transition temperature the material become significantly less pliable and maintains its new shape. A number of processes have been developed for shaping thermoplastics including single and twin sheet thermoforming.
Thermoplastics can be used to laminate various articles including load-bearing structures. U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,796 to Matich, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, involves applying thermoplastic sheets to a preformed rigid structure. The structural component is essentially rigid and a thermoplastic skin is applied to either one or both sides of the structural component. U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,796 to Dummett, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses applying thermoplastic sheets to a preformed rigid structure for manufacturing dunnage platforms.
The manufacture of articles by twin sheet thermoplastic molding often involves the use of complimentary male and female molding tools. In one common methodology a thin sheet of thermoplastic material is heated until it is pliable, and positioned adjacent to a male mold. The thermoplastic sheet is then moved relative to the tool's surface until the sheet assumes the same shape as the surface of the tool. A second sheet of thermoplastic material is heated until it becomes pliable. The heated second sheet is then centered over the cavity of a female molding tool and moved relative to the female tool molding until the interior portion of the second sheet substantially conforms to the interior shape of the female tool.
Vacuum-assist molding uses a vacuum to help draw heated thermoplastic sheets into contact with the surface of the tools. Irrespective of how they are formed, after the two thermoplastic sheets have taken on the shapes of the male and female molds, the edges of the sheets are pressed together and welded to form a single article. U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,524 to Rush et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses vacuum-assist thermoplastic molding.
An alternative to vacuum molding is plug-assist molding. In plug-assist molding, a rigid tool is used to push a heated sheet at least partly into the cavity of a second tool with a surface shape complimentary to the shape of the first tool. U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,606 to Chun et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,524 to Rush et al., both of which are hereby incorporated by reference their entirety, describe plug-assist molding. U.S. Patent Application 026,0344 to Bearse et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes using a compressible core as a plug in the plug-assist molding process. The compressible core member used becomes a part of the manufactured article and helps to strengthen and stabilize the article. The compressible member, as a part of the manufactured article, continues to resist compression. The expansive force exerted by the core member trying to expand against the constraining force exerted by the shell strengthens the bond between the shell and the core.
A knock down or collapsible shipping container made up of a plurality of surfaces including a base, four walls and a top panel each being made from a light weight core laminated with a thermoplastic. In one embodiment of the invention structural metal mesh can be inserted into the core to resist piercing of the surface. In another embodiment of the invention, the walls are held together with clasps. The shipping container is modular, lightweight, thermally insulating, tamper proof and provides a sanitary coating and thermal capacity for transportation of foodstuffs and other valuable products. Upon delivery and unloading, the walls and top of the container can be disassembled and stacked on the dunnage base to reduce the volume of the container for storage or further shipment.
In one embodiment of the invention, a shipping container bag is disclosed that is light weight, strong, made of a fire retardant material and which forms an ultra violet (UV) light reflective, weather-proof and dust particle barrier to protect the integrity of the shipping container. The expression ‘UV light reflective’ indicates that no more than 2% of either UV-A, UV-B or UV-C light is transmitted through the bag material. The term ‘weather-proof’ indicates that the bag is substantially impenetrable to water, in as much as less than 5% of 2.5 mm (1 inch) of rainfall at or below Beaufort scale 4 wind will accumulate within the bag in the form of moisture or residue at an ambient temperature of 25° C. (77° F.) and humidity of less than 80%. The shipping container bag can be used to store the shipping container, when not in use. The shipping container bag can be used to enclose the shipping container. The shipping container bag can be used to store transport and/or dispense one or more shipping containers. Alternatively, the shipping container bag can be used to store transport and/or dispense one or more knocked down shipping containers. It is understood that a person having ordinary skill in the art can tailor the dimensions of the shipping container bag to suit the number of shipping container bags to be stored and/or the configuration, knocked-down or assembled, of the containers to be stored.
In an embodiment of the invention, a system of shipping cargo using easy to disassemble shipping containers is provided to a client as a means of eliminating ISPM-15 issues, improving cargo safety, reducing shipping costs and improving convenience. The reduced weight of the easy to disassemble shipping containers compared to an equivalent wood container results in savings in freight costs. A system of pre selling the monthly production allocation of easy to disassemble shipping containers produced from a shipping container manufacturing machine to specific clients can be based on cargo lift volume contracts. Clients are selected by the ‘forwarder’ based on optimum profiles for cargo destinations, freight costs, type of cargo, size and importance of client and overall value of service to client, cargo manufacturer and cargo recipient. The manufacturer receives a proportion of the cost savings of shipping the cargo in return for supplying the easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers for client's use in shipping client's cargo. In addition, a system and method for storing, dispensing, positioning, tracking, and transporting shipping containers based on the shipping container bag is disclosed. Such a system and method enable one or more of supplying, dispensing, positioning, tracking, transporting, forwarding and storing light weight shipping containers based on the shipping containers and the shipping container bags.
Other embodiments of the shipping container system and method for supplying, dispensing, positioning, tracking, transporting, forwarding and storing light weight shipping containers based on the shipping container bag, within the spirit and scope of the invention, can be understood by a review of the specification, the claims, and the figures.
In one embodiment of the invention, the shipping container is a modular, knockdown, lightweight, thermally insulating, tamper proof, shipping container. In an embodiment, the shipping container dimensions are 1219 mm (48 inches)×1016 mm (40 inches)×1016 mm (40 inches). In various embodiments, the shipping container is 23 kg (50 lb) in weight. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the core of each of the walls, top panel and base of the shipping container include a strengthening material such as wire mesh. In these embodiments, the weight of the shipping container can be 23 kg (50 lb) plus the weight of the strengthening material. In another embodiment of the invention, latches can be used when assembling the shipping container. In this embodiment the weight of the shipping container can be 23 kg (50 lb) plus the weight of the latches. In a further embodiment of the invention, the shipping container can be locked. In this embodiment the weight of the shipping container can be 23 kg (50 lb) plus the weight of the locking device. Accordingly, it is envisaged that methods of strengthening, clasping and locking the shipping container will add additional weight to the basic weight of the shipping container. In one embodiment, the clasps are over center clasps. In another embodiment the clasps are Hardy Built™ snap fasteners. Depending on the type of clasps used, different numbers of clasps can be used. For example, using Hardy Built™ clasps eight clasps can be used, where each clasp weighs approximately 1 kg (2 lb), and eight clasps will add 7 kg (16 lb) to the weight of the shipping container. In one embodiment the shipping container is 30.5 kg (67 lb) with locking clasps. However, lighter alternative clasps, straps and locks including those made of plastic or carbon fiber can add less weight and thus can be preferred.
In another embodiment the base of the shipping container differs from the standard 1219 mm (48 inches)×1016 mm (40 inches) base. In this embodiment, the shipping container base can be custom sized. The shipping container top panel can match the shipping container base and the shipping container walls can be modified based on the lesser or greater dimensions compared with the standard dimensions. The height of the shipping container can be 1016 mm (40 inches). In still another embodiment one or more of the length, width and height dimensions of the shipping container can be modified from the standard dimensions. In a further embodiment of the invention, the dimensions of the shipping container can be modified to meet the Returnable Plastic Container (RPC) requirements.
In various embodiments of the invention, the shipping container base, top panel and walls are made of a polymer core covered with a thermoplastic sheet. In various embodiments of the invention, the polymer core and thermoplastic sheet can be chemically combined. In one embodiment of the invention, the shipping container base, top panel and walls are made of an Expandable Polystyrene (PSE) core chemically combined with High Impact Polystyrene sheets (HIPS). Because of a chemical combination of components, comparing the core before the chemical combination to the shipping container material that is formed, there is an increase in strength to weight ratio of as much as 1000:1 when using PSE chemically combined with HIPS.
In various alternative embodiments of the invention, the core material can be a blend of polyphenylene ether (PPE) and polystyrene (PS) impregnated with pentane, a blend of polyphenylene ether (PPE) and polystyrene (PS) impregnated with pentane or polyethylene (PE) and Polypropylene.
In various alternative embodiments of the invention, the thermoplastic sheets used to cover the core can be either polypropylene/polypropylene composite, Polycarbonate (PC), Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Polypropylene (PP), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polyphenyl Ether alloyed with High Impact Polystyrene. Many of these thermoplastic sheets have desirable properties when the shipping container design requires a living hinge or other flexible properties.
In one embodiment, a compressible core member is introduced and sandwiched between a first heated thermoplastic sheet. Subsequently, the reverse side of the core member is sandwiched between a second heated thermoplastic sheet. The join between the two thermoplastic sheet surfaces can then be cut and welded to seal the outer surface of the light weight shipping container material. By welding the join between the two thermoplastic sheets the resulting product can be sealed so as to prohibit the collection of organic matter and thereby inhibit the growth of bacteria, mold and parasites. In an alternative embodiment, the first sheet is applied to the first surface of the core and then when the second sheet is to be applied, the edge of the first sheet is heated to allow the second sheet to be applied to the second surface of the core and at the same time welded to the first sheet applied to the edges of the core.
In another embodiment, a compressible core member is stacked or sandwiched between two heated thermoplastic sheets. The sandwich is compressed and corresponding portions of the two sheets contact one another and bond together. The core member bonds to the interior surface of the thermoplastic shell as the core member tries to expand and contacts portions of the other thermoplastic sheet.
In one embodiment the latches are attached to reinforcing plates located on the corresponding interior surfaces prior to formation of the light weight shipping container material or inside surfaces after formation of the light weight shipping container material. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the latches are mounted to the core or the strengthening mesh and are laminated by the thermoplastic layer.
In various embodiments of the invention, a lightweight mesh is embedded in the polymer core prior to application of the thermoplastic sheet to the lower and upper surfaces of the polymer core. In an embodiment of the invention, a lightweight mesh is embedded in the expanded polystyrene core prior to chemically combining with high impact polystyrene. In an alternative embodiment, a thin perforated sheet or barrier is incorporated into the polymer core. In one embodiment the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is metallic. In another embodiment the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is made of Kevlar. In a further embodiment the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is made of carbon fiber. In another embodiment the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is made of Formica. By imbedding mesh, a perforated sheet or a barrier within the core, the shipping container base, walls and top panel cannot be simply punctured or pierced with items such as knives, chisels, crowbars or other such devices (i.e., puncture proof). As such the shipping container is defined as being ‘tamper-proof’ meaning that the integrity of the container is not susceptible to attack by persons wielding instruments that can be concealed under items of clothing. Tamper proof is a less stringent requirement than safe. Tamper proof is designed to insure that the container cannot be broken into by an opportunistic thief. That is persons having instruments that can be concealed under items of clothing and used to break or disturb the integrity of the container. Tamper proof does not secure a container against heavy equipment, or power tools.
In an embodiment of the invention, the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is made of a conducting material and is connected to a voltage supply such that contact with the surface of the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier will transmit an electric shock. The electric shock can be controlled by a microprocessor to deliver one or more combinations of low voltage low current or high voltage low current shocks. The microprocessor can be inserted in the core or positioned inside the shipping container and connected to the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier. The voltage supply can be inserted in the core or positioned inside the shipping container and connected to the microprocessor circuit and the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier inside the shipping container. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a warning siren, flashing light or foul odor alarm can be activated by the microprocessor when the integrity of the shipping container is breached. The warning siren alarm can be positioned in the core or inside the shipping container and connected to the microprocessor circuit and the voltage supply. The foul odor alarm can be positioned in the core or inside the shipping container with a cavity connecting the odor reservoir to the outside of the container and a relay valve connected to the microprocessor circuit. The flashing light alarm can be inserted in the core where the light can penetrate through the thermoplastic sheet and can be connected to the microprocessor circuit and the voltage supply. In this embodiment, the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier can be light weight and electrically conducting. When the integrity of the mesh, perforated sheet or barrier is disrupted a voltage meter senses the reduced voltage being conducted and sets off the alarm. A light emitting diode or other warning can be visible on the exterior of the shipping container and can be used to alert handlers that the shipping container is wired to an alarm system. A sensor can relay a signal to the microprocessor and can be used by the client or the shipping agent to disconnect the voltage supply or otherwise disarm the alarm, prior to unloading the shipping container on arrival at the destination.
In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container base is made of a polymer core chemically combined with a thermoplastic sheet, while the shipping container walls and top panel are made of a core in which either mesh, a perforated sheet or a barrier are imbedded prior to chemically combining the core with a thermoplastic sheet to give the finished surface. In another embodiment of the invention, one or more of the shipping container base, walls and top panel are made of a core in which either mesh, a perforated sheet or a barrier are imbedded prior to chemically combining the core with a thermoplastic sheet to give the finished surface, while the remaining materials used to construct the shipping container are made of a polymer core chemically combined with a thermoplastic sheet. In this embodiment, the reinforced materials are indistinguishable from the non-reinforced materials when subjected to visual inspection. In this way an opportunistic thief cannot be certain how difficult it can be to gain entry to any given shipping container. In various embodiments of the invention, the shipping container exterior surfaces can be imprinted with information warning about safety and or theft protection measures required when handling the shipping container.
In one embodiment of the invention, where a surface is inserted into a groove or recess in an adjoining surface (e.g., a base is inserted into the groove of a wall) then a clasp can be used to insure the integrity of the connection. In one embodiment of the invention, the clasp can connect with the mesh, sheet or barrier inserted in the core of the first surface and can pass through a hole positioned in the groove or recess area of the second surface, where the hole allows the clasp to pass through the second surface (and the mesh, sheet or barrier inserted in the core of the second surface). The clasp can then be fixed on the outside of the second surface or connect with straps encircling the shipping container.
In one embodiment of the invention, the shipping container is made up of two or more shipping container bases which enable the container to be assembled and partially loaded while sitting on a first base and then tilted onto a second base which was acting as a wall and further loaded while in this position. By replacing some of the walls with bases, it can be possible to turn the shipping container onto another wall and continue loading of the shipping container. By replacing all walls with bases, it can be possible to turn the shipping container onto any wall and continue loading of the shipping container.
In an alternative embodiment, the shipping container can be adapted to ship liquids by first installing a bag or liner inside the shipping container, where the bag or liner is filled with the liquid. The bag or liner is then sealed to retain the liquid. In an alternative embodiment, the bag or liner is attached to the shipping container walls and the shipping container top panel is used to stop the bag or liner falling below the height of the liquid in the bag or liner and thereby avoiding spilling the contents of the liquid during shipment. In an embodiment of the invention, a package can be introduced into the container to control the temperature inside the container. The package can contain dry ice, liquid nitrogen, liquid helium or other cryogenic coolants. In another embodiment of the invention, a compressor, re-circulated coolant, external heat exhaust and power supply to drive the compressor can be introduced into the container to control the temperature inside the container.
As shown in
A major advantage of the shipping container is that it is simply and rapidly ‘knocked-down’ or disassembled allowing for return shipment to the point of origin or other point of destination for reassembly, reloading, re-use or storage.
In one embodiment of the invention, in addition to clasps, spring steel is bounded around the four shipping container walls or two shipping container walls and the shipping container base and shipping container top panel. In one embodiment of the invention, a living hinge is used with clips on one corner and the top. In one embodiment of the invention, the locking devices can be positioned on the shipping container base so that when the shipping container is standing and loaded on the ground the weight of the shipment serves to impede unauthorized access to the locks and thereby the shipment.
The combination of puncture proof walls, top panel and base together with fasteners that cannot be pried or leveraged from the puncture proof surfaces makes the shipment contained in the locked shipping container, substantially tamper-proof.
In an embodiment of the invention, the shipping container base is designed with a slight (approximately 6 mm or 0.25 inch) bulge at the bottom of each leg. As shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container is constructed in two pieces with living hinges, 800 separating five panels that attach to the shipping container base. The four walls, 801, 802, 803 and 804 and the top panel, 805, are interconnected as shown in
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the shipping container is constructed in two pieces with living hinges separating five panels that attach to the shipping container base. The four walls, 901, 902, 903 and 904 and the top panel, 905, are interconnected as shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container is constructed in one piece with living hinges separating six panels. The four walls, 1001, 1002, 1003 and 1004, the top panel, 1005 and the base, 1006, are interconnected as shown in
In an embodiment of the invention, a shipping container bag of length, 1027 mm (50 inches), width, 1067 mm (42 inches) and height, 30.5 m (120 inches) can be used to store 11 knocked down shipping containers. In another embodiment of the invention, a shipping container bag of length, 1027 mm (50 inches), width, 1067 mm (42 inches) and height, 30.5 m (120 inches) can be used to store 3 assembled shipping containers. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a shipping container bag of length, 1027 mm (50 inches), width, 1067 mm (42 inches) and height, 60 m (240 inches) can be used to store 20 knocked down shipping containers. In another embodiment of the invention, a shipping container bag of length, 1027 mm (50 inches), width, 1067 mm (42 inches) and height, 60 m (240 inches) can be used to store 6 assembled shipping containers.
In an embodiment of the invention, the shipping container bag can be used to store one or more knocked down shipping containers. In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container bag can be used to store shipping containers when not in use. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the shipping container bag can be used to enclose shipping containers for storage or transportation. The shipping container bag can also be used to transport one or more knocked down shipping containers. In addition, a system and method for storing, dispensing, positioning, tracking, and transporting shipping containers based on the shipping container bag is disclosed.
In an embodiment of the invention, a hoist can be attached to the shipping container bag via a spring attached to a hook which connects with a spreader plate to assist in storing the shipping container bag.
In an embodiment of the invention, a transport base can be attached to the shipping container bag to assist in moving the shipping container bag. In an embodiment of the invention, the shipping container bag can be angle folded onto itself to pack the bag for storage when not in use.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the base of the knock down collapsible shipping container is made from 0.250 inch thick aluminum plate, with dimensions 1315 mm (51.75 inches)×1035 mm (40.75 inches)×76 mm (3 inches). In another embodiment, the base, 1405, fits into an aluminum bra, 1410, as shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container base, 1510, inserted in a bra, 1505, is connected to the walls and top panel of the shipping container. Each of the walls and the top panel fit into a square aluminum frame, 1584 as shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the shipping container base, walls and top panel are formed with a groove on each side edge rather than a recess at the end of each side. In this embodiment, the shipping container base, walls and top panel are attached to a lightweight aluminum frame. The aluminum frame is assembled in the cube shape of the shipping container. The frame has eight thin connecting aluminum struts interconnected via eight ‘three point centers’. Each ‘three point center’ connects to three struts. Each strut that is orthogonal to two other struts connected to the ‘three point center’. Each ‘three point center’ connects to three struts to define two sides and a top or bottom of the cube. Each strut is ‘L’ shaped in cross section where each side of the ‘L’ is a narrow knife blade. The ‘L’ shape of each strut is oriented so that each is pointing to define the sides of a cube. Each knife-edge is designed to fit into a groove in the side edge of each of the shipping container base, top panel and walls.
In an embodiment of the invention, a system of shipping cargo using easy to disassemble shipping containers is provided to a client as a means of eliminating ISPM-15 issues, improving cargo safety, reducing shipping costs and improving convenience.
In an embodiment of the invention, a light weight shipping container manufacturer (hereinafter ‘manufacturer’), shipping forwarder (hereinafter ‘forwarder’) and manufacturer with cargo to ship (hereinafter ‘client’) co-operate to ship a client's cargo without ISPM-15 concerns at a reduced cargo freight cost, thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. In an embodiment of the invention, a manufacturer makes a commitment to an airfreight cargo forwarder of a cargo lift volume contract in return for supply of light weight shipping containers to resolve ISPM-15 issues and other advantages such as cargo safety, human safety and convenience. Client agrees to pay shipping freight cost as would be incurred with wood containers. In return the manufacturer makes a commitment of sufficient light weight shipping containers for shipping the cargo. The airfreight cargo forwarder who assigns manufacturing capacity to client requires a balancing commitment from the client of a cargo lift volume contract. By using a light eight shipping container the air freight forwarder saves between 68-159 kg (150-350 lb) per shipping container. Assuming the light weight container is as much as 63 kg (140 lb), the airfreight cargo forwarder saves 60% of the direct air cargo freight container cost of shipping the cargo (for a 63 kg (140 lb) light weight shipping container compared with a 160 kg (350 lb) wood container). Thus the reduced weight of the easy to disassemble shipping containers compared to an equivalent wood container results in savings in freight costs, thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. The airfreight cargo forwarder using light weight shipping containers which do not contain wood solves clients ISPM-15 concerns, thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the manufacturer ships the light weight shipping containers in a fire retardant bag which the client can use to hang, store and dispense the light weight shipping containers as required, saving space while eliminating a fire hazard and thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. In another embodiment of the present invention, the manufacturer supplies a fire retardant bag which the client can use to hang and store light weight shipping containers after unloading cargo received, saving space while eliminating a fire hazard and thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the manufacture supplies light weight shipping containers with RFID tags thereby allowing the forwarder to track the shipment while en route thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the manufacture supplies shipping container bags with RFID tags thereby allowing the forwarder to track the use requirements of the client thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result.
In an embodiment of the invention, one or more forwarders provide light weight shipping containers and shipping container bags to their clients free of charge in exchange for retaining the financial benefit of weight savings. In an embodiment of the invention, the client receives one or more advantages including (1) improved convenience, (2) cost savings of not having to buy shipping containers, (3) eliminating ISPM-15 issues, (4) improving cargo safety (5) improving human safety, (6) the ability to track demand for shipping containers to ship cargo, (7) the ability to track receipt of shipping containers and remove unwanted unloaded shipping containers and (8) the ability to track shipping containers en route.
In an embodiment of the invention, manufacturer production facilities can be located at desirable locations to clients. Factories can be readily placed in forwarders' market regions to service local clients. In an embodiment of the invention, the facility can be moved if changes occur in the geographic location of client cargo shipping needs. These advantages are facilitated because the production facilities are: (1) remarkably portable and inexpensive, (2) easily deployed anywhere, and (3) able to produce up to 2,500 light weight shipping containers per month. In an embodiment of the invention, additional facilities can be deployed to address increases in production. Thus the production facilities can be adjusted to match the production scale.
In an embodiment of the invention, each forwarder can secure exclusive “Agency” rights for a port or market region and pre-sell the full monthly production allocation of 2,500 light weight shipping containers (per manufacturer machine) by consigning them free of charge to strategic clients in exchange for cargo lift volume contracts. In an embodiment of the invention, when the first allocation has been sold, pre-sale of a second production allocation, based on an additional manufacturing machine, can begin until the major market clients are fully sold on a first-option basis. In this way the risk of investment in manufacturing machines can be offset by cargo lift volume contracts. Clients are selected based on optimum profiles for cargo destinations, freight costs, type of cargo, size and importance of client and overall value of service the program provides to forwarder and client.
Revenues to forwarder are calculated on a cargo weight savings basis of 90 kg (200 lb) per shipping container and shipping container costs are paid to manufacturer from those savings, leaving the cash balance to the forwarder. At $1 per 0.45 kg (1 lb), each shipping container can yield $200 cash profit ($125,000 month) to the forwarder. The forwarder would have no cash risk, as manufacturer is paid ($150) per shipping container from the saving stream (following collection of client's invoices) and the remainder is held by the forwarder. The major expense of the forwarder involves sales effort to pre-sell the cargo region.
In another embodiment of the invention, a Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) tag is imbedded in one or more of: the core of the base, the core of the top panel and the cores of the four walls. In one embodiment of the invention, the RFID tag operates using an Ultra High Frequency (UHF) signal. In another embodiment of the invention, the RFID tag operates using a microwave frequency signal.
In one embodiment, the RFID tag is centered in the middle of the core of the base, top panel or walls. In another embodiment, the RFID tag is placed on the edge of the core of the base, top panel or walls prior to the lamination of the core with the high impact polystyrene. In an embodiment where metal mesh, perforated sheet or a barrier are placed within the core, the RFID tag can be positioned so that the RFID tag antenna is least affected by the metal in the core.
In one embodiment the RFID tag is read only. In another embodiment, the RFID tag contains an Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), which enables both read and write functions. In an embodiment of the invention, the RFID tag is passive. In another embodiment of the invention, the RFID tag is semi passive containing a source of energy such as a battery to allow the tag to be constantly powered. In a further embodiment of the invention, the RFID tag is active, containing an internal power source, such as a battery, which is used to power any Integrated Circuit's (ICs) in the tag and generate the outgoing signal. In another embodiment, the tag has the ability to enable location sensing through a photo sensor.
In one embodiment of the invention, a cellular modem is imbedded in the core of one or more of the base, top panel and walls of the shipping container. The cellular modem can be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) modem. In an embodiment of the invention, a RFID reader and associate integrated circuit processor are embedded together with the cellular modem in the core of one or more of the base, top panel and walls of the shipping container. In such an embodiment, the RFID tags and RFID reader are positioned to optimize the RFID read of the RFID tags from the other surfaces, which make up the shipping container.
In an embodiment of the invention, where a RFID reader and a cellular modem are embedded in the core of one or more of the plurality of surfaces in the shipping container, the RFID reader is in communication with one or more of the RFID tags which make up the surfaces of one or more shipping containers in the vicinity of the RFID reader. The RFID reader and associated integrated circuit processor are able to distinguish the RFID tag from surfaces associate with different shipping containers based on one or more of location, strength of signal, variation of RFID tag signal with time and prior input data. In an embodiment of the invention, the RFID reader and associate processor are in communication with the embedded cellular modem. In an embodiment of the invention, the cellular modem is in communication with a base station and can transmit one or more parameters selected from the group consisting of one or more RFID tag location, one or more RFID tag identification code, shipment information, shipment condition, shipment container condition, time stamp.
In an embodiment of the invention, the microprocessor that monitors the integrity of the shipping container can transmit an alarm signal through the cellular modem thereby silently alerting the shipping agent to the breach of the shipping container integrity.
In one embodiment of the invention the RFID code uses the IEEE format and is Electronic Product Code (EPC) readable. In another embodiment of the invention the RFID code uses the UCC format and is Universal Product Code (UPC) readable. In another embodiment, the format is compatible for EPC, European Article Number (EAN) and UPC read and write functions.
In one embodiment of the invention, a manufacturer makes a commitment to an airfreight cargo forwarder of a cargo lift volume contract in return for supply of easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers to resolve ISPM-15 issues and other advantages such as cargo safety, human safety and convenience. Client agrees to pay shipping freight cost as would be incurred with wood containers. In return the manufacturer makes a commitment of sufficient easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers for shipping the cargo. The airfreight cargo forwarder who assigns manufacturing capacity to clients requires a balancing commitment from the client of a cargo lift volume contract. The airfreight cargo forwarder saves 60% of the total freight cost of shipping the cargo (after subtracting the cost of the easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers), while solving clients ISPM-15 concerns.
In an embodiment of the invention, an easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers manufacturer (hereinafter ‘manufacturer’), shipping forwarder (hereinafter ‘forwarder’) and manufacturer with cargo to ship (hereinafter ‘client’) co-operate to ship a client's cargo without ISPM-15 concerns at a reduced cargo freight cost, thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the manufacture supplies easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers with RFID tags thereby allowing the forwarder to track the shipment while en route thereby producing a useful concrete and tangible result.
Forwarders to provide easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers to their clients free of charge in exchange for retaining the financial benefit of weight savings, while giving their clients: (1) improved convenience, (2) cost of not having to buy containers, (3) eliminating ISPM-15 issues, (4) improving cargo safety, (5) improving human safety, (6) controlling the temperature of the cargo in the container and (7) gaining greater contracted cargo volume from clients.
Manufacturer production facilities are: (1) remarkably portable and inexpensive, (2) easily deployed anywhere, and (3) able to produce up to 2,500 easy to disassemble thermally insulating shipping containers per month. Factories can be readily placed in forwarders' market regions to service their local clients. No other competitive container production can match this scalability.
Each forwarder can secure exclusive “Agency” rights for a port or market region and pre-sell the full monthly production allocation of 2,500 containers (per manufacturer machine) by consigning them free of charge to strategic clients in exchange for cargo lift volume contracts. When the first allocation is gone, pre-sale of a second unit can begin until the major market clients are fully sold on a first-option basis. This strategy removes all risks from the program rollout. Clients are selected based on optimum profiles for cargo destinations, freight costs, type of cargo, size and importance of client and overall value of service the program provides to forwarder and client.
Revenues to forwarder are calculated on a cargo weight savings basis of 200 pounds per container and container costs are paid to manufacturer from those savings, leaving the cash balance to the forwarder. At $1 per pound, each container can yield $100 cash profit ($125,000 per month) to the forwarder. The forwarder can have no cash risk, as manufacturer is paid $60 per container from the saving stream (following collection of client's invoices) and the remainder is held by the forwarder. The only investment of the forwarder is the cost of sales efforts to pre-sell the cargo region.
In an embodiment of the invention, an easy to disassemble shipping container consisting of a base with two or more legs, a top panel and four walls. Wherein one or more of the base, the top panel and the four walls comprises a core, substantially surrounded by one or more thermoplastic sheets and one or more fasteners for fastening one or more of the base, the top panel and the four walls to one or more of the base, the top panel and the four walls.
In an embodiment of the invention, the net weight of the shipping container is between a lower limit of approximately 22 kg (50 lb) and an upper limit of approximately 90 kg (200 lb).
In an embodiment of the invention, a method of shipping products comprising loading the temperature sensitive products on a base with two or more legs, including a core and substantially surrounded by one or more thermoplastic sheets. Assembling four walls around the base, wherein the walls extend above the height of the products on the base. Wherein the four walls are made of lightweight material including a core and substantially surrounded by one or more thermoplastic sheets. Placing a top panel on top of the four walls, wherein the top panel is made of lightweight material including a core and substantially surrounded by one or more thermoplastic sheets. Fastening the base to one or more walls and the top panel to one or more walls. Wherein one or more of the base, the top panel and the four walls further comprise a strengthening material selected from the group consisting of a mesh, a perforated sheet and a barrier embedded in the core. Wherein the total weight of the base, the top panel and the four walls is between a lower limit of approximately 22 kg (50 lb) and an upper limit of approximately 90 kg (200 lb).
This application claims priority to: (1) U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/672,863, entitled “MODULAR, KNOCK-DOWN, LIGHT WEIGHT, THERMALLY INSULATING, TAMPER PROOF SHIPPING CONTAINER AND FIRE RETARDANT SHIPPING BAG” by Vance L. Seagle et al., filed Feb. 8, 2007 which claims priority to (2) U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/771,746, entitled: “MODULAR, KNOCK-DOWN, LIGHT WEIGHT, THERMALLY INSULATING, TAMPER PROOF SHIPPING CONTAINER”, inventors: Seagle et al., filed Feb. 9, 2006; (3) U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/773,454, entitled: “LIGHT WEIGHT, STRONG, FIRE RETARDANT DUNNAGE PLATFORM BAG AND SYSTEM OF LOADING, DISPENSING AND USING BAG”, inventors: Seagle et al., filed Feb. 15, 2006; and (4) U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/817,868, entitled: “FREIGHT FORWARDING SYSTEM”, inventors: Seagle et al., filed Jun. 30, 2006. These applications (1) -(4) are herein expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
337816 | Ricci | Mar 1886 | A |
3511191 | Barry | May 1970 | A |
3581681 | Newton | Jun 1971 | A |
3654012 | Schlager | Apr 1972 | A |
3903023 | Boutillier | Sep 1975 | A |
4030600 | Heaps | Jun 1977 | A |
4397246 | Ishida | Aug 1983 | A |
4661302 | Park | Apr 1987 | A |
4705811 | Park | Nov 1987 | A |
4734441 | Park | Mar 1988 | A |
4796540 | Pelfrey | Jan 1989 | A |
4908606 | Kevonian | Mar 1990 | A |
5031776 | Morgan, IV | Jul 1991 | A |
5098498 | Hale | Mar 1992 | A |
5156094 | Johansson | Oct 1992 | A |
5266396 | Howard | Nov 1993 | A |
5362436 | Wagner | Nov 1994 | A |
5369135 | Campbell | Nov 1994 | A |
5401456 | Alesi, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417167 | Sadr | May 1995 | A |
5525636 | Henn | Jun 1996 | A |
5544568 | Potgeiter | Aug 1996 | A |
5555980 | Johnston | Sep 1996 | A |
5558241 | Huffstutler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5598675 | Pruss | Feb 1997 | A |
5601912 | Ellingson | Feb 1997 | A |
5685644 | Taylor | Nov 1997 | A |
5829595 | Brown | Nov 1998 | A |
5833796 | Matich | Nov 1998 | A |
6021916 | Stolzman | Feb 2000 | A |
6029583 | LeTrudet | Feb 2000 | A |
6076693 | Reiter | Jun 2000 | A |
6123032 | Ohanesian | Sep 2000 | A |
6191228 | Nosker | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224706 | Matich | May 2001 | B1 |
6294114 | Muirhead | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298994 | Debrunner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6380294 | Babinec | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395791 | Chaudhary | May 2002 | B1 |
6431372 | Aoyama | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446563 | Ohanesian | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458232 | Valentinsson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6622642 | Ohanesian | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637353 | Alizade | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6659020 | Ball | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6718888 | Muirhead | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745703 | Torrey | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748876 | Preisler | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786992 | Dummett | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6824860 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6941877 | Dickner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943678 | Muirhead | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955129 | Moore | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976436 | Sugihara | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6984695 | Brown | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7025208 | Baker | Apr 2006 | B2 |
D521208 | France | May 2006 | S |
7044066 | Miller | May 2006 | B1 |
7128797 | Dummett | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7342496 | Muirhead | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7413698 | Bearse et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7544262 | Dummett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7611596 | Dummett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7752980 | Muirhead | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789024 | Muirhead | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7804400 | Muirhead | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7923087 | Dummett | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927677 | Dummett | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948371 | Muirhead | May 2011 | B2 |
20010030142 | Baker et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020015811 | Gusavage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020097283 | Askren et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125090 | Mercado | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030183600 | Straka | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040112907 | Donnelly | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050108988 | Dickner | May 2005 | A1 |
20050241548 | Muirhead | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263044 | Bearse | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274296 | Dickner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003044 | DiNello et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060090844 | Dummett | May 2006 | A1 |
20070137531 | Muirhead | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
404185 | Dec 1965 | CH |
2045712 | Sep 1970 | DE |
2045712 | Mar 1972 | DE |
8429708 | Feb 1985 | DE |
0 422 542 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 480 451 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 520 508 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 500 599 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2697801 | Jun 1992 | FR |
2697801 | May 1994 | FR |
1308036 | Feb 1973 | GB |
WO 9523682 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 0238471 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 03099668 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 03099676 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 03099689 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004026713 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005105590 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005105599 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation into English of German patent application 2045712. |
Machine translation into English of French patent application 2697801. |
Kempfer, L., “Lighten the Load,” Material Handling Management, pp. 26-31 (Aug. 2006). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US07/62266, dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110226655 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60771746 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60773454 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60817868 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11672863 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 13118512 | US |