The present invention relates in general to a modular liquid-metal magneto-hydrodynamic (LMMHD) power generation cell, and more particularly, to a LMMHD power generation cell that converts an applied mechanical power supplied by very strong, but slow moving forces such as ocean waves, into usable electric power.
The ocean waves have historically been considered a potential source of useful energy. Numerous attempts and researches have been made to extract power from ocean waves. For example, a seawater-based magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) generator for generating electricity from the heave motion of ocean waves has been proposed and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,136,173. The MHD generator includes a power generator placed well below the ocean surface and connected to a bobbing surface float via a rigid rod. The motion of the seawater across an applied magnetic field produces electricity. An advantage for such an approach is that there are no moving parts, or at least, not any part moved relative to the main body of the power generator. However, as the seawater used as the MHD interaction fluid is not nearly conductive enough to generate any reasonably-attainable magnetic field strengths, inefficiency becomes a major problem of the generator.
A liquid-metal magneto-hydrodynamic (LMMHD) power generation cell is provided to facilitate efficient, practical, and economical conversion of applied mechanical power supplied in the form of very strong, but slow moving forces such as ocean waves, into usable electric power. The LMMHD power generation cell couples forces available from ocean waves to a liquid-metal working fluid inside a generator to result in generated electric power/volume approximately six orders of magnitude greater than that using seawater as the interacting fluid.
In one embodiment, the LMMHD power generation cell comprises a fluid channel in which a conductive fluid is forced to flow in response to an external force. A pair of pressure conveying members such as bellow reservoirs can be used for conveying the external force to the conductive flow. A magnetic field is established across the fluid channel by a pair of magnets. A pair of electrodes is disposed perpendicularly to both the magnetic field and the fluid channel for collecting the electric current induced by the conductive fluid flowing through the magnetic field. The magnets include either permanent magnets or electromagnets. The conductive fluid includes low-density, low-viscosity, high-conductivity liquid metal such as NaK-78.
To resolve the power losses caused by end electromagnetic effects, each of the magnets has a tapered side surface adjacent to the fluid channel, such that a tapered magnetic field is established. In addition, the ends of the fluid channel are also tapered from two sides of the electrodes. The power generation cell further comprises a pair of yokes holding the magnets at two sides of the fluid channel. Preferably, the yokes are fabricated from magnetic steel. To suppress magnetic saturation, a magnet gap is formed in each yoke. More specifically, each of the yokes preferably includes two symmetric magnetic members joined with each other by a non-magnetic separator.
A power generator is constructed by connecting a plurality of the liquid-metal magneto-hydrodynamic power generation cells in series. An external conveying mechanism is employed for conveying an external force to the liquid metal within each power generation cell. The external conveying mechanism includes a pair of chambers filled with hydraulic oil. The pressure conveying members of the power generation cells are enclosed in the respective chambers. A pair of pistons is connected to the respective chambers to pressurize the hydraulic oil, so as to generate the flow of the liquid metal within the fluid channels.
The patent application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent with color drawings will be provided by the Patent and Trademark Office upon request and payment of necessary fee.
These as well as other features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reference to the drawings therein:
Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purpose of illustrating preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and not for purposes of limiting the same,
The basic interactions between the forced flowing fluid, the applied magnetic field and the generated electric current are determined by established principles of magneto-hydrodynamics, which themselves follow basic classical electromagnetic principles, specifically Faraday's Law of Induction: ∇×=−∂/∂t and the Lorentz Force Law: q=q(+×), where is the generated electric field, and is the applied magnetic field, and is the speed of the fluid flow.
Before explaining how the LMMHD power generation cell as shown in
a. Open-circuit voltage without a load: Voc=Bw;
b. Internal Ohmic resistance of the cell RC:
c. Voltage VL delivered to a load RL:
d. Current IL delivered to the load:
e. Power PL delivered to the load:
f. Power PC consumed in cell Ohmic heating:
Based on the above relationships, the ideal power conversion efficiency can be obtained as:
It is known that in any actual MHD cell, the achieved power conversion efficiency is often much less than the ideal power conversion efficiency, that is, η<ηideal. Nevertheless, continuing the ideal analyses, the maximum deliverable power to the load occurs under matched load conditions, that is, RL=RC. The maximum power can thus be derived from:
with the power conversion efficiency (at P=Pmax) equal to 50% (In most cases, one would choose to operate at RL>RC to achieve higher efficiency).
The above expressions reveal the scaling relationships for the most basic MHD parameters within the limit of the ideal model. For example, the generated electric power to the load is proportional to the fluid conductivity σ, the square of the fluid speed v2, the square of the magnetic field B2, and the volume wLd of the cell. It is for this reason that seawater with a conductivity of about 4 S/m represents a poor choice of working fluid compared to materials such as eutectic liquid-metal alloy of sodium and potassium known as NaK-78, of which the conductivity is about 2.63×106 S/m. Therefore, an ideal NaK-filled MHD cell should produce about 650,000 times the output power of the identical seawater-filled MHD cell. Since the capital cost of generating strong magnetic fields is approximately proportional to the volume of field required, economic considerations alone lead one to consider liquid metal as the working fluid.
The expressions above are only true to the extent that idealizations asserted earlier are valid. In a more complete analysis, most of the above parameters must be modified due to: (1) perturbation of the applied magnetic field by fields from the MHD-generated current; (2) fluid frictional and kinematic losses; and (3) two types of cell “end-effects”, which in many cases represent the most serious sources of wasted power (and thus reduced efficiency). In general, these effects act to reduce both the available output power and the power conversion efficiency.
The extent to which the applied magnetic field within the main body of the MHD cell (not including end effects) tends to become distorted by the induced MHD currents can be estimated from the Magnetic Reynolds Number Rm=μ0vσd for a cell of thickness d. As Rm increases to unity or larger, the fluid begins to literally expel the magnetic field from within it, thereby thwarting the basic MHD power generation mechanism. The expression of the Magnetic Reynolds Number can be referred to “The Electromagneto-dynamics of Fluids” by W. F. Hughes and F. J. Young, Kreiger Publishing Co., Malabar, Fla. 1989.
Fortunately, even with very highly-conductive fluids such as liquid metals, keeping Rm relatively small is fairly easy to do, provided that the fluid speed v is not too extreme and the cell thickness d is not too large. More specific details of the perturbations to the applied field are calculated via numerical models of specific configurations.
The direct fluid friction power losses may be computed via:
where ρm is the fluid mass density, vis the fluid speed in the cell, Ac is the cross-sectional area of the channel (aka, the cell), Leff is the effective length of the channel, heff is the equivalent circular diameter of the channel, and f is an empirical tabulated factor depending upon heff and the ordinary fluid Reynolds number Re associated with the flow. The expression of direct fluid friction power loss Pfluid
In contrast, fluid kinematic power losses arise via a different mechanism, including the acceleration of the fluid out of the entrance reservoir so as to pass through the interaction region of the cell at speed v, to be followed by exiting and suffering an inelastic collision with the rest of the fluid piling up in the exit reservoir. The kinetic energy that must be provided to the fluid in this process is thereby lost into heat. The kinetic energy lost per unit time is the kinematic power loss, which may be computed from:
where vdrive is the initial speed of the driving fluid external to the cell. For most circumstances of interest here, vdrive<<v, so the term in parentheses of the equation directly above is about 1.
According to the above, both the kinematic and frictional power losses are linearly proportional to the fluid mass density ρm, while the useable MHD power generated within the cell is independent of ρm. This means that lower mass density fluid yields more efficient MHD power generation. In addition, both kinematic and direct frictional power losses are directly proportional to the cube of the fluid speed, while the useable MHD power generated by the cell is roughly proportional to the square of the fluid speed. This implies that although the electric power generated increases quadratically with fluid speed, the efficiency of this process begins to fall rapidly with v, once the speed is increased to a value high enough for the frictional and kinematic loss terms to become significant. The lower the density of the fluid, the higher this threshold speed will be, and thus the greater power can be efficiently produced from an MHD cell of any given size.
As understood, there exist serious power losses due to electromagnetic effects that occur at the entrance and exit of the cell. These end losses are divided into two categories, including:
a. closed-loop circulating electric current (aka “eddy-current”) induced in and confined to fluid, due to gradient in the magnetic fields at each end of the MHD cell; and
b. undesirable return-path currents, also occurring at each end of the cell, which act to close the circuit between the electrodes via paths through the fluid, rather than across an external load.
In most geometries, the second of these two end effects represents the more serious power loss mechanism.
To more effectively resolve the end electromagnetic effects, in one embodiment, a combination of tapering in both the magnetic field strength and the fluid flow geometry is provided to result in a near cancellation of the most serious power loss mechanisms associated with the end-loss currents noted above. The tapered magnetic field is depicted in the exploded view of the LMMHD generation cell as shown in
As shown in
The geometry of the fluid channel within the fluid chamber 101 is further illustrated in
When the fluid is not flowing, the magnetic field in the cell is symmetric and balanced, in the sense that the upper and lower sections of the yoke carry equal amounts of magnetic flux. However, when the fluid is forced through the cell, the induced electric currents in both the cell and in the external electrodes generate another component to the magnetic field, with field lines looping around this induced electric current. This magnetic field then couples into the magnetic yokes 109, unbalancing the yoke magnetic field distribution. Such an imbalance is undesirable, not only because it reduces the uniformity of the magnetic in the MHD interaction region, but because it can drive sections of the magnetic yoke material into magnetic saturation. Therefore, in this embodiment, a magnetic gap is formed within each yoke 109. That is, as shown in
Magnetic saturation is the tendency of the magnetic permeability of the material to decrease towards unity, which allows the magnetic field lines to leak out of the material and degrade the integrity of the magnetic circuit overall. High-quality magnetic iron, for example, very low carbon steel such as type 1010 steel tends to saturate at a magnetic field of about 2.2 Tesla.
To produce higher voltages and power output, the LMMHD cells as shown in
As mentioned above, to achieve the highest efficiency in conversion of applied mechanical power into electrical power, the liquid metal employed in the LMMHD cell should be low-density, low-viscosity and a very good electrical conductor. Unfortunately, very few metals are liquid at or near room temperature, and most of them are of very high density such as mercury. A liquid metal with vastly better properties from an MHD perspective is NaK-78, a eutectic alloy of sodium and potassium. It is also very inexpensive. However, it is highly reactive with water and oxygen. The modular design of
It will be appreciated that the 16-cell generator as shown in
The generator as shown in
Because of the relatively high-current, low-voltage output produced even when multiple modular LMMHD cells are connected in series, a local power converter is essential to up-convert to high voltages and low currents. Fortunately, modem solid-state switching power-inverter technologies are fully applicable to this task and can perform this function both efficiently and economically. For the case of an ocean wave energy converter employing an LMMHD array, local energy storage (rechargeable DC batteries, as fed by the generator) would be employed to act as a buffer to the generator power, thereby maintaining an approximately-constant DC input voltage to drive the aforementioned solid-state power inverter. Following the basic power-inversion process, a step-up transformer could be employed to convert this power to the high-voltage, low-current AC appropriate for power transmission to the seashore or another location.
While an illustrative and presently preferred embodiment of the invention has been described in detail herein, it is to be understood that the inventive concepts may be otherwise variously embodied and employed and that the appended claims are intended to be construed to include such variations except insofar as limited by the prior art.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/534,072, filed Jan. 5, 2004, entitled MODULAR LIQUID METAL MHD POWER GENERATION CELL, the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2897650 | Carlson, Jr. et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
3345523 | Grunwald | Oct 1967 | A |
3399315 | Powell, Jr. | Aug 1968 | A |
3878410 | Petrick et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4151423 | Hendel | Apr 1979 | A |
4180752 | Gorlin et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4200815 | Petrick et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4218629 | Kayukawa et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4359706 | Flack | Nov 1982 | A |
4388542 | Lee et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4785209 | Sainsbury | Nov 1988 | A |
5136173 | Rynne | Aug 1992 | A |
5614773 | Fabris | Mar 1997 | A |
5637934 | Fabris | Jun 1997 | A |
5923104 | Haaland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6310406 | Van Berkel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6916565 | Shioya | Jul 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050146140 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60534072 | Jan 2004 | US |