The embodiments herein relate to multi-marking module, wide media printing platforms. They find particular application to a configuration that combines images created by different marking modules to increase printing width capabilities relative to each individual marking module.
In conventional xerography, an electrostatic latent image is created on the surface of a photoconducting insulator (e.g., a photoreceptor) and subsequently transferred to a final receiving substrate or medium. This typically involves the following. A uniform electrostatic charge is deposited on the photoreceptor surface, for example, by a corona discharge. The photoreceptor is then exposed (via optics, a laser, LEDs . . . ) with an image of the object to be reproduced. The exposure selectively dissipates the surface charge in the exposed regions and creates a latent image in the form of an electrostatic charge pattern. The image is developed by transferring electrostatically charged toner particles to the photoreceptor surface.
The electrostatically charged toner particles are either attracted to the charged (unexposed) regions, or repelled therefrom and deposited in the discharged (exposed) regions. The toner particles are then transferred from the photoconductor to a transfer element (e.g., a transfer belt or drum), and subsequently transferred to a receiving substrate. The transferred image is made permanent by various techniques including pressure, heat, radiation, solvent, or some combination thereof. In a multicolor electrophotographic process, latent images corresponding to different colors are formed on one or more photoreceptors and developed with respective toner. Each single color toner image is transferred to the substrate or intermediate receiver in superimposed registration with the prior toner image(s) to form the multicolor-image.
In conventional marking modules the width of the components used to mark the surface of the photoreceptor is matched to the photoreceptor width, which determines the maximum substrate width which can be usefully printed upon. A common marking engine width seen in office machines is about 12″ and is used to reproduce images on letter size (8.5″×11″) paper. However, marking engines are produced with various other widths (e.g., 24″, 36″ or more).
A consequence associated with increasing marking engine width is higher cost. Thus, it is generally more efficient to make marking engines no wider than dictated by the substrate size requirements of the market segment being served. These requirements can vary greatly across market segments. For instance, in a typical office a process width that supports letter size (11″ width) is common and sufficient. However, production applications often can demand process widths of 26″ or more. In addition to adding cost, increasing marking engine width may result in decreased image uniformity across the width and reduced component reliability (e.g., longer corotron wires). Moreover, producing multiple marking engines with different widths compromises part commonly, which can lead to an inflated cost of ownership.
The following applications, the disclosures of each being totally incorporated herein by reference are mentioned:
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/761,522, filed Jan. 21, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Barry P. Mandel, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/785,211, filed Feb. 24, 2004, entitled “UNIVERSAL FLEXIBLE PLURAL PRINTER TO PLURAL FINISHER SHEET INTEGRATION SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,619, filed Jun. 30, 2004, entitled “FLEXIBLE PAPER PATH USING MULTIDIRECTIONAL PATH MODULES,” by Daniel G. Bobrow.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,768, filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE CONSISTING OF CONTAINERIZED IMAGE MARKING ENGINES AND MEDIA FEEDER MODULES,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,106, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL HIGHWAY AND SINGLE PASS DUPLEX,” by Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,113, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH INVERTER DISPOSED FOR MEDIA VELOCITY BUFFERING AND REGISTRATION,” by Joannes N. M. dejong, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,459, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE USING IMAGE MARKING ENGINE MODULES (as amended),” by Barry P. Mandel, et al;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/051,817, filed Feb. 4, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/089,854, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “SHEET REGISTRATION WITHIN A MEDIA INVERTER,” by Robert A. Clark et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,498, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “INVERTER WITH RETURN/BYPASS PAPER PATH,” by Robert A. Clark;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/094,998, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE WITH PARALLEL HORIZONTAL PRINTING MODULES,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,566, filed Apr. 19, 2005, entitled “MEDIA TRANSPORT SYSTEM,” by Mandel et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/166,581, filed Jun. 24, 2005, entitled “MIXED OUTPUT PRINT CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM,” by Joseph H. Lang et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/166,961, filed Jun. 24, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM SHEET FEEDER,” by Steven R. Moore; and
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/166,299, filed Jun. 24, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Steven R. Moore.
In one embodiment, a printing platform is illustrated which includes two or more marking modules offset perpendicular to a process direction to create an aggregate imageable area that is wider than an imageable area of any of the individual marking modules.
With reference to
The marking entities 4 can be single-color xerographic engines, multi-color print engines and/or specific xerographic processing elements. A suitable single color xerographic engine may include individual xerographic processing elements such as an expose element, a charge element, a develop element, and a photoreceptor, which facilitate marking an image on a receiving element. A suitable multicolor xerographic engine may include xerographic processing elements such as an expose element, a charge element, a develop element, a photoreceptor, and optionally one or more intermediate transfer elements (belt or drum) for superimposing or combining different colored images to form a multicolored image. Likewise, the multicolor xerographic engine facilitates marking an image on one or more receiving elements.
With a dual-marking engine configuration in which two equal-sized single and/or multicolor marking engines are positioned parallel to one another in a receiving element width direction and perpendicular to a process direction, an image approximately twice the width of any one of the marking engines can be generated. In another non-limiting example, a single and/or multicolor N-marking engine printing platform (where N is an integer greater than one) can mark an image with a width up to approximately the summation of the widths of the N marking engines. In the case of equal width marking engines, the resulting image width would be about N times the width of any single marking engine.
Examples of a marking entity 4 configuration comprising individual xerographic processing elements include two or more of at least one of an expose element, a charge element, and/or a develop element. For example, two or more charge elements may be used to deposit a charge on different portions of a single photoreceptor, which accommodates the full imageable width. Additionally and/or alternatively, two or more expose elements can be used to expose different portions of the single photoreceptor. Additionally and/or alternatively, two or more development elements can be used to transfer charged toner particles to different portions of the single photoreceptor surface. The toner particles can then be transferred from the single photoconductor to one or more receiving elements and/or to a final substrate.
The marking entities 4 can include typical size marking engines and/or xerographic processing elements. Thus, the printing platform 2 can use a plurality of readily available and relatively inexpensive marking entities to support printing to various width substrates without having to use larger width marking modules. The foregoing facilitates parts commonality and re-use, which can decrease cost of ownership, and mitigates producing low volume and/or custom sized wide width marking modules. In addition, image uniformity across the width, relative to wider width marking module, can be increased.
The printing platform 2 can receive data to image from a data feed 6 and a substrate from a substrate feed 8 (e.g., one or more trays). The data feed 6 and/or the substrate feed 8 can be distinct components (as shown) coupled to the printing platform and/or part of the printing platform 2. Image data received from the data feed 6 is reproduced via the marking entities 4 on the substrate obtained from the substrate feed 8 to produce an image that is wider than an image marked by any one of the marking entities 4.
Adjacent marking modules (e.g., marking module 12 and marking module 14) can be staggered offset parallel from each other in a media width direction 32 and perpendicular to a process direction 34. In addition, adjacent marking modules can be aligned with overlap in the width direction 32 as depicted at 36 and/or without overlap (not shown). Staggering the marking modules 12-20 as such enables imaging over greater widths without having to use larger width marking modules. Thus, existing marking engines and/or other xerographic process elements can be combined and re-used rather than producing custom width marking engines and/or xerographic process elements. For example, existing 12″ marking engines can be combined to generate a platform for media widths of about 24″, 36″, etc. while maintaining low machine Product Acquisition Spending (PAS), lower Unit Manufacturing Cost (UMC), and improved value chains due to higher reuse across multiple markets.
Image registration marks can be placed on the receiving element 10. Such marks can be similar to registration marks applied in tandem design color registration. Image stitching across interfaces can be achieved through known technologies.
With multicolor marking engines, the modules 12-20 can be offset in full-color sets or staggered by color. The latter minimizes the distance and time covering the combination of any given color onto the receiving element 10, which may facilitate the accurate relative registration of the two or more images of the given color. This staggering technique enables cascading of the marking modules 12-20 over a substantial portion of the media width 32 for reproducing images with widths greater than any individual marking module.
Initially referring to
The marking engines 36 and 42 are positioned such that they are offset parallel to one another in a width direction of an intermediate transfer element (ITE) 48 and perpendicular to a process direction. Optionally, the marking engines 36 and 42 are aligned with respect to each other to slightly overlap in the process direction; however, the marking engines 36 and 42 can alternatively be aligned with respect to each other without overlap. Image registration marks can be placed on the intermediate transfer element 48. It is to be understood that the intermediate transfer element 48 is a receiving element similar to the receiving element 10 described above.
The photoreceptors 40 and 46 are shown adjacent to the intermediate transfer element 48, which can be a single transfer belt or a single drum. The marking engines 36 and 42 are utilized to reproduce an image on the ITE 48, and the image can be subsequently transferred to a final substrate 50, which can be paper, velum, and the like. This configuration permits writing and sensing of registration marks on the intermediate transfer element 48, facilitating precise control of alignment of colors across the width, including offsetting all colors at once and/or color-by-color. Alignment can be achieved through actuators such as a combination of electronic image shifting and/or mechanical translation of the downstream engine(s).
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Similar color marking modules (e.g., marking module 58 and marking module 60) can be staggered offset parallel from each other in the media width direction 32 and perpendicular to the process direction 34. In an alternative instance, the marking modules 58-72 can be staggered by color, which minimizes the distance and time covering the combination of any given color onto the receiving element 10. In addition, adjacent marking modules can be aligned with overlap in the process direction 34 as depicted at 36 and/or without overlap (not shown). Image registration marks such as marks similar to registration marks applied in tandem design color registration can be placed on the receiving element 10. Staggering marking modules in this manner enables imaging over greater widths without having to use larger width marking modules. As discussed previously, the receiving element 10 can be one or more intermediate transfer elements such as drums and/or belts or a final substrate.
At 80, the at least two marking modules are used to produce an image on a substrate in which the image width is greater than an image reproduced by any one of the marking modules. Various approaches can be used to transfer the image to the substrate. For example, in one instance each of the marking modules is associated with a corresponding photoreceptor, and each photoreceptor is used to transfer a portion of an image to a common intermediate transfer element (e.g., a belt and a drum), wherein the portions are subsequently transferred to a final substrate. In another instance, each of the marking modules is associated with a corresponding photoreceptor, and each photoreceptor is used to transfer a portion of an image directly to a final substrate.
In yet another instance, each of the marking modules is associated with a corresponding photoreceptor, and each photoreceptor is associated with a corresponding intermediate transfer element (e.g., a belt and a drum). Images are first transferred from each photoreceptor to each intermediate transfer element, and then the images are transferred from each intermediate transfer element to a common intermediate transfer element (e.g., a belt and a drum), wherein the images are subsequently transferred to a final substrate. In still another instance, each of the marking modules is associated with a corresponding photoreceptor, and each photoreceptor is associated with a corresponding intermediate transfer element (e.g., a belt and a drum). Images are transferred from each photoreceptor directly to a final substrate.
Alternatively, the printing platform can be configured with various combinations of xerographic processing elements as described above. For example, two or more charge elements may be used to deposit a charge on different portions of a single photoreceptor, which accommodates the full imageable width, two or more expose elements can be used to expose different portions of the single photoreceptor, and/or two or more development elements can be used to transfer charged toner particles to different portions of the single photoreceptor surface. The toner particles can subsequently be transferred a final substrate to render a wide image.
It will be appreciated that the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4579446 | Fujino et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4587532 | Asano | May 1986 | A |
4836119 | Siraco et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5004222 | Dobashi | Apr 1991 | A |
5080340 | Hacknauer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5095342 | Farrell et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5159395 | Farrell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5208640 | Horie et al. | May 1993 | A |
5272511 | Conrad et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5326093 | Sollitt | Jul 1994 | A |
5435544 | Mandel | Jul 1995 | A |
5473419 | Russel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489969 | Soler et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504568 | Saraswat et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525031 | Fox | Jun 1996 | A |
5557367 | Yang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568246 | Keller et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570172 | Acquaviva | Oct 1996 | A |
5596416 | Barry et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629762 | Mahoney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5710968 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5778377 | Marlin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5884910 | Mandel | Mar 1999 | A |
5995721 | Rourke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6059284 | Wolf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076917 | Wen | Jun 2000 | A |
6125248 | Moser | Sep 2000 | A |
6241242 | Munro | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297886 | Cornell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341773 | Aprato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348937 | Hata | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6384918 | Hubble, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6450711 | Conrow | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476376 | Biegelsen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476923 | Cornell | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493098 | Cornell | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537910 | Burke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6550762 | Stoll | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554276 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577925 | Fromherz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607320 | Bobrow et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608988 | Conrow | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612566 | Stoll | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6612571 | Rider | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621576 | Tandon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633382 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639669 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6819906 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6925283 | Mandel et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
20020078012 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103559 | Gartstein | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030077095 | Conrow | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081227 | Williams et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040085561 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085562 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088207 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040150156 | Fromherz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040150158 | Biegelsen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153983 | McMillan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216002 | Fromherz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225391 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225394 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247365 | Lofthus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070041745 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |