1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to metal wall frames, and in particular to such frames which include channels and studs having integrally formed connectors, locators and retainers.
2. Description of Prior Developments
Framing systems have been developed using metal channels and studs in place of more conventional wood frames. Such systems have been adapted to construct various structures including residential and commercial buildings, and particularly the partitions of such buildings. Although these systems function adequately, they may be difficult to use and can take longer to assemble than conventional wood frames.
Because of these drawbacks, many builders have been reluctant to adopt prior metal framing systems. Moreover, installers have experienced difficulty in correctly installing prior metal framing systems. Installers also dislike the snipping and cutting of the metal frame members required in such systems, as the sharp metal edges can result in cut hands and torn clothes. For these reasons, wood frames are still the most commonly used frames for residential construction.
Although wood frames have been widely accepted by builders and installers, wood frames are not fireproof and wood tends to buckle, warp, split, shrink, and bend out of shape. Moreover, a wood stud is heavier and more awkward to work with than a metal stud, and is currently about twice the price of a metal stud.
Even with the drawbacks associated with wood frames, wood is still the material of choice of most builders, particularly since carpenters are familiar with wood frame construction and can nail wood frames together with a nail gun faster than they can screw a nail into a metal frame with a screw gun.
The following comparison of existing standard wood and conventional metal study applications may be of value in fully appreciating the advantages of the present invention.
Installation of a wall partition constructed of wooden studs, after upper and lower plates have been installed, requires the following steps for each stud:
It can be seen that wood fame construction requires many individual time-consuming steps. Moreover, problems associated with wood studs include:
Installation of a partition constructed of metal studs, after the upper and lower channels have been installed, requires the following steps for each stud:
It can be seen that conventional metal frame construction requires many individual time consuming steps. Moreover, problems associated with conventional metal studs include:
However, metal stud installation does include the following benefits:
Accordingly, a need exists for a framing system which is easy to understand, quick to assemble, which does not require extensive cutting or snipping and which is cost-effective as compared to current alternative methods.
A further need exists for such a system which is more economical to use than wood frame systems and which is readily accepted by architects, builders, installers and end users.
A further need exists for a framing system which provides accurate spacing between studs and which is available with modular interchangeable components.
Still a further need exists for a framing system which offers a complete and simple solution rather than a partial solution to the entire installation process.
The present invention has been developed to fulfill the needs noted above and therefore has as an object the provision of a metal framing system for supporting the walls, floors and ceilings of various building structures including residential and commercial buildings.
This invention provides a comprehensive and cost-effective solution to the construction industry in the creation and installation of wall/partition frames by facilitating a much simpler and speedier installation resulting in greatly reduced labor costs while at the same time maintaining quality control in the integrity and accuracy of the installation.
The construction industry whose workers are tradition and trade-oriented has been very slow to adopt any innovative methodologies or technologies. On the other hand, there is always a desire on the part of builders and consumers to reduce costs in building.
The only way to satisfy both ends of the spectrum is to present a solution which creates significant cost-savings while at the same time having certain key ingredients: simple, easy to learn, practical (makes life easier for the worker) and also provides a complete solution, rather than dribs and drabs.
This invention has the key ingredients to satisfy the worker and take away the worker's opposition to innovation. Those same ingredients have the effect of cutting costs for the builder. Time is money, and a speedy operation becomes a less expensive one.
Previous patents and innovations have in most instances offered a solution to only a small part of the process—rather than to the whole thing. This invention provides a complete solution. Importantly, the invention does not seek to “replace” steps in stud-wall building with a “better mouse trap”. Instead it just eliminates some of the steps entirely for the tradesperson.
While saving money and streamlining operations, the invention maintains the integrity and accuracy of the installation. Studs must be perfectly square-plumb and on center for drywall installation.
Another object of the invention is the provision of a metal framing system which is easy to use, quick to assemble and does not require metal cutting during frame assembly.
Another object of the invention is the provision of a complete modular framing system which is simple in form, easy to learn and easy to use.
A further object of the invention is the provision of a metal wall framing system which eliminates some of the steps required to construct a conventional metal or wood frame, while providing a square, plumb and on-center metal frame for supporting drywall or other wall materials.
Yet another object of the invention is the provision of a metal framing system which is significantly faster and more economical to assemble than other wood and metal framing systems.
Still another object of the invention is the provision of a modular metal framing system which is easily used by an unskilled, lower-cost worker. The system is also intended for use by inexperienced do-it-yourself homeowners lacking the tools, knowledge and experience of a skilled professional framer.
A further object of the invention is the provision of a metal wall framing system which does not require supplemental hardware, requires no supplemental fasteners, nails, electric tools or other power tools, nor any measuring devices or cutting devices.
Still a further object of the invention is the provision of a modular metal framing system which includes a side spacer or bracer which optionally provides spacing and alignment of studs and serves as a larger surface for supporting drywall and into which metal screws can be more conveniently secured to hold the drywall to the frame.
These and other objects are met by the present invention which is directed to a modular metal framing system for constructing wall frames in virtually any type of building construction. The system is complete insofar as it requires virtually no additional hardware and can be readily used by unskilled labor. Metal wall frames constructed in accordance with the invention can be completed in a fraction of the time and at much lower cost than wood frames as well as other conventional metal frame systems.
In accordance with the invention, upper and lower metal channels are formed with a series of evenly spaced locators or stops which accurately locate a series of metal studs along the channels. The channels also include retainers or prongs located adjacent to the locators or stops for fitting within slots formed in the studs. The channels further include scored or notched areas located adjacent to the stops and prongs for allowing a portion of each channel side wall to be crimped inwardly to hold a stud in place on the channel.
In order to interconnect and mount a stud on a channel, the stud is simply moved along the channel with a sliding movement until the stud engages a stop. Just before the stud engages a stop, one or more locators or prongs slide into mating slots formed in the stud to hold and guide the stud into alignment with the stop. Notched or perforated portions in the channel sidewalls are then crimped inwardly to hold the stud in place within the channel. This provides a bracing system for spacing and leveling.
The aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the invention will, in part, be pointed out with particularity, and will, in part, become obvious from the following more detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which form an integral part thereof.
In the drawings:
a) is a partial central longitudinal sectional view taken through a first embodiment of a retainer member;
b) is a view similar to
a) is a perspective view of the stud of
a) is a view similar to
b) is a top plan view of
a) is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the extender of
a) is a top plan view of a portion of one of the spacer bars of
In the various figures of the drawings, like reference characters designate like or similar parts.
The present invention will now be described in conjunction with the drawings, beginning with
Channel member 10 includes a flat, longitudinally-extending central floor 12 and a pair of upstanding parallel side walls 14 which are bent upwardly at right angles from each side of floor 12. Channel member 10 is formed of a sheet metal material such as steel. A stud locator or stop member in the form of a tab 16 is struck or punched upwardly from the channel floor 12 leaving behind an open aperture 18 in floor 12.
Tab 16 may take virtually any shape such as the rectangular tab show in
One or more retaining members 20 are also struck out or punched up from channel floor 12, leaving behind an open aperture 22 in floor 12. As shown in
In
As further seen in
As seen in
As can be appreciated from a review of
When the stud is fully and properly butted flat against the tab 16, it is also fully seated against the retainer members 20. In the example of the retainer member 20 of
At this point, the crimp portions 28 are bent inwardly from the side walls 14 of channel member 10 to form locking members 44. An open notch 46 is thus formed in the top edge 29 of each side wall 14. The locking members 44 can be closely spaced from the lips 36 on stud 30 or in contact with lips 36.
The general spacing of the interconnected channel member 10 and stud 30 is shown in
A variation of this positioning, locating, aligning and locking stud and channel framing system is shown in
A further variation of the invention is shown in
In the example of
In each of the prior examples, a pair of identical channel members 10 is aligned with one channel member directly above another. One channel member may be attached by fasteners to a floor and the other similarly attached to a ceiling. The tabs 16 on each channel member are vertically aligned one directly over the other and the channel members are carefully plumbed longitudinally parallel with one another as well.
The aligned channel members provide for the accurate vertically plumbed alignment of the studs when the studs are pushed against a pair of aligned tabs 16; one tab being on the upper channel member and one on the lower channel member. In this case, the alignment slots 38 on each opposite end of the stud 30 are identical so that both ends of the studs are aligned by sliding the studs against a pair of stops or tabs 16 and interengaging the slots 38 with retainer members 20 on each channel member 10. Crimp portions 28 are then bent inwardly as described above.
A further embodiment of the invention is shown in
Rather than secure the upper or top portion 62 of stud 30 directly to an overhead channel member 10, the extender 60 is vertically adjusted by sliding within the top portion 62 to engage the tabs 16 and retainer members 20 on the channel member 10. The side walls 64 on extender 60 may be slightly inwardly tapered toward one another to form a snug sliding friction fit against the side walls 34 of top portion 62. This prevents the extender from having a loose slack fit within the stud 30.
The upper portion 66 of the extender 60 may be transversely or laterally enlarged along outwardly tapered portions 68 to prevent the extender 60 from sliding completely into the stud 30 by interfering with or abutting against the top edge 70 of stud 30. As further seen in
Normally, the lower alignment slits 74 are engaged with retainer members 20 on an upper channel member 10 attached to a ceiling. The retainer members 20 are thus spaced below the ceiling on which the upper channel member is fastened and spaced below the floor 12 of the upper channel member 10. With this arrangement, the top edge 78 of the extender 60 fits snugly against the floor 12 of the upper channel member. When the upper slots 72 are engaged with the retainer members 20, the top edge 78 of the extender 60 is spaced a small distance below the floor 12 of the upper channel member. This spacing accommodates settling of the ceiling and floors of the building structure and/or allows for additional loading which can compress and lower a ceiling.
When a stud 30 is attached directly to an upper channel member without an extender 60, it is suitable for use in load bearing walls, providing the gauge of the metal stud meets the strength requirements for a load bearing partition. However, when the extender 60 is used, it is loosely telescopically positioned within the stud and as such is not suitable for use in load bearing walls.
As seen in
The extender 60 of
A variation of the horizontally or transversely elongated alignment slots 72, 74 of
In each of the embodiments discussed above, the upper and lower portions of each stud 30 are secured in place between the upper and lower channels 10 and held in place by stops such as tabs 16 which are accurately positioned on, for example, 16 inch or 24 inch spacings. An alternative embodiment of this arrangement is to secure the bottom portion of each stud 30 as described in any of the examples above, but to allow the upper portion of each stud to slide longitudinally within the upper channel member without being locked in place.
This can be achieved by eliminating the tabs 16 from the upper channel member 10. One or more “L” shaped retainer members 20 as shown in
In this embodiment, the upper channel member 10 need not be accurately aligned horizontally from wall to wall with the lower channel member 10. The lower channel member 10 is spaced and positioned where desired and the upper channel member 10 is simply approximately located above the lower channel member. Although the upper and lower channel members are aligned vertically in a common plane, they are not necessarily spaced and aligned accurately on 16 inch or 24 inch centers with one another. This allows for wall variations which may be wider on top than at the bottom or vice versa.
In this case, the lower ends of the studs 30 are secured within a channel member 10 as discussed in connection with the previous embodiments. The upper ends of the studs 30 (or extenders 60) are simply slid onto the retainer members 20 and left to freely slide or “float” along the length of retainer legs 26. Accurate spacing of the studs 30 can still be achieved, however, by the use of one or more central spacer or bracer bars 84 as shown in
In
As seen in
One example of such receiving members is shown in
Socket 96 is dimensioned to receive each tongue member 88 with a tight locking fit or a snap fit. While the tongue members in
A further variation of the spacer bar assembly is shown in
A variation of the socket 96 of
In
As seen in
There has been disclosed heretofore the best embodiment of the invention presently contemplated. However, it is to be understood that the various changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1993792 | Manske et al. | Mar 1935 | A |
2235761 | Goldsmith | Mar 1941 | A |
2298104 | Brunemann | Oct 1942 | A |
3008550 | Miles et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
3240297 | Desy | Mar 1966 | A |
3244290 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3680271 | Satchell | Aug 1972 | A |
3720995 | Brown et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3845601 | Kostecky | Nov 1974 | A |
3851435 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4459790 | Vermillion | Jul 1984 | A |
4805364 | Smolik | Feb 1989 | A |
5060434 | Allison | Oct 1991 | A |
5212926 | Beasley | May 1993 | A |
5274973 | Liang | Jan 1994 | A |
5632127 | Agar et al. | May 1997 | A |
5720138 | Johnson | Feb 1998 | A |