1. Technical Field
The embodiments and methods described herein generally relate to power conversion and power converters, and more particularly to improvements in their reliability, efficiency, and scalability.
2. Description of the Related Art
Power converters convert one form of electrical power to another. For example, a Direct Current (DC) to DC power converter could convert a variable DC voltage produced by, for example, a photovoltaic panel into a constant DC voltage to charge a battery. Similarly, a DC to Alternating Current (AC) inverter could convert the variable DC voltage of a photovoltaic panel into a constant AC voltage to supply power to an electrical grid. DC to AC inverters can supply both active power and reactive power and can have single phase or multi-phase outputs. AC to DC converters convert AC power into DC power. For example, an AC to DC converter might convert AC power from the electrical grid into DC power to charge a battery.
Power converters can be unidirectional or bidirectional. A unidirectional power converter has defined input and output terminals and power flows only into the input terminals and out of the output terminals. A bidirectional power converter does not have defined input and output terminals. Power can flow either into or out of a set of terminals. For example, a bidirectional AC to DC converter might convert AC power from the electrical grid into DC power to charge a battery during one part of the day and might then convert DC power from the battery into AC power to supply the grid during another part of the day.
Volts-Amperes-reactive (VAr) compensators are power converters that provide purely reactive power. VAr compensators are used to correct the power factor in the presence of large reactive loads. For example, if there is a large inductive load, a VAr compensator could supply reactive power to correct the power factor closer to unity. If there is a large capacitive load, the VAr compensator could consume reactive power to correct the power factor closer to unity. VAr compensators are also used to regulate the voltage and frequency of the transmission grid.
Power converters such as, for example, DC to DC converters, DC to AC inverters, bidirectional converters, or VAr compensators could be of a monolithic design. They could only contain a single instance of each major power converter component. They could be designed with a fixed maximum power capacity and not be designed to be scalable or upgradeable.
Module approaches to power converter design consist of modularizing portions of the converters functionality. For example, a three phase switching mode DC to AC converter could use three, single phase, DC to AC switching modules with a central controller generating the switch signals. An AC to AC power converter for a wind generator could consist of one module for the input portion of the converter to convert a variable AC voltage to a constant DC voltage and a second module for the output portion of the converter to convert DC to AC for an electrical grid, the two modules being connected by an intermediate power bus. In known modular power converters, the modules are typically not autonomous and do not perform the complete power conversion function of the power converter.
In view of the foregoing, an embodiment herein provides a method for converting electrical power, the method comprising providing a modular power converter comprising a mode control module and a plurality of autonomously operating power conversion modules operatively connected to a first power bus; selecting, by the mode control module, individual modes of operation for the plurality of power conversion modules to meet a power conversion requirement; receiving electrical power of a first power type from the first power bus by at least one of the power conversion modules; and converting the received electrical power into electrical power of a second power type by the at least one power conversion module. The plurality of power conversion modules comprise may substantially equal volts-amperes-reactive conversion capacities, and wherein the selecting of individual modes of operation comprises selecting the power conversion modules to operate in either a standby mode or one of an inductive or a capacitive mode so that reactive power is either absorbed or supplied to the first power bus. The power conversion modules operating in one of the inductive or capacitive mode all convert substantially the same volts-amperes-reactive (VAr) amounts.
The method may further comprise supplying the power of the second power type to a second power bus that is operatively connected to each of the plurality of autonomously operating power conversion modules. The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting the power conversion modules to operate in different power modes selected based on a substantially maximum power efficiency. The individual modes of operation may comprise any of an efficient power mode, a variable power mode, and a standby mode. The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting one of the power conversion modules to operate in a variable power mode and selecting all other power conversion modules to operate in either an efficient power mode or a standby mode during power conversion. The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting the plurality of power conversion modules to all operate in an equal power mode when the power conversion requirement is greater than a maximum efficient power of the modular power converter.
The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting at least one of the power conversion modules to operate in a power maximization mode and selecting all other power conversion modules to operate in an efficient power mode or standby mode. wherein in the power maximization mode, the method further comprises the at least one of the power conversion modules operating a maximum power point tracking process that maximizes a power production of a photovoltaic panel array operatively connected to the second power bus. The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting at least one of the power conversion modules to operate in a power maximization mode and all other power conversion modules to operate in equal power maximum power point tracking mode when the power conversion requirement is greater than a maximum efficient power of the modular power converter.
The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting at least one of the power conversion modules to operate in a reactive power mode. The selecting of individual modes of operation may comprise selecting a number of power conversion modules to operate in any of the reactive power mode and a complex power mode to meet a reactive power requirement up to a remaining power conversion capacity of the modular power converter. The power conversion modules selected for the complex power mode produces reactive power to meet a reactive power requirement up to a remaining reactive power of the power conversion module and all remaining power conversion modules operate in a standby mode or produce only real power. The method may further comprise supplying the power of the second type on the second power bus after conversion from the power of the first type on the first power bus or supplying the power of the first type on the first power bus after conversion from the power of the second type on the second power bus.
The first power bus may comprise a multiphase bus and the steps of selecting of individual modes of operation and converting the received power into the electrical power of the second type by the at least one power conversion module may comprise providing differing amounts of electrical power to each phase of the multiphase bus to maintain root mean square (RMS) voltage values of the different phases substantially equal.
Another embodiment provides a modular power converter system comprising a first power bus; a plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules operatively connected to the first power bus; and a mode control module that selects power conversion modes for the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules, wherein the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules convert electrical power on the first power bus having power of a first power type into power of a second power type depending on power conversion requirements. The system may further comprise a second power bus operatively connected to each of the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules, wherein the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules function to convert power from the first power bus comprising a first power type into power comprising a second power type for output onto the second power bus. The system may further comprise a second power bus operatively connected to each of the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules, wherein the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules: convert power from the first power bus comprising the first power type into power comprising the second power type for output onto the second power bus, and convert power from the second power bus comprising a second power type into power comprising the first power type for output onto the first power bus.
The system may further comprise a switching module to operably engage the modular power converter to a first external electrical power source; and a plurality of electrical connections operatively connected to the second power bus to operably connect to a second external electrical power source, wherein the modular power converter bidirectionally converts power between the first power bus and the second power bus, and wherein the switching module engages or disengages the first external electrical power source from the modular power converter. The first external electrical power source may comprise an AC grid, and wherein the second external electrical power source comprises a DC storage device. The switching module may disconnect the AC grid from the modular power converter during a grid power outage. The system may further comprise a power shelf to which the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules and the mode control module are removably mounted thereto.
The system may further comprise a communication bus; a plurality of first socket connections in the power shelf that provide electrical connection of the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules to the first power bus; and a plurality of second socket connections that operatively connect the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules and the mode control module to the communication bus. The power shelf may comprise a rack comprising at least one slot that receives the mode control module. The autonomously functioning power conversion modules and the mode control module may be removably attached and detached to the power shelf without powering down the modular power converter system.
Another embodiment provides a modular power converter comprising a communication bus; a first DC power bus; an AC power bus; a second DC power bus; a plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules of a first type operatively connected to the communication bus, each operatively connected to the first DC power bus, and each operatively connected to the second DC power bus; a plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules of a second type operatively connected to the communication bus, each operatively connected to the first DC power bus, and each operatively connected to the AC power bus; an electrical connection that operatively connects the first DC power bus to an external power source; and a mode control module operatively connected to the communication bus, wherein the mode control module selects power conversion modes for the plurality of autonomously functioning power conversion modules, wherein the modular power converter performs multiple power conversion functions depending on load and power conversion requirements. The modular power converter may further comprise an electrical connection that operatively connects the second DC power bus to a power generator.
These and other aspects of the embodiments herein will be better appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the following descriptions, while indicating preferred embodiments and numerous specific details thereof, are given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the embodiments herein without departing from the spirit thereof, and the embodiments herein include all such modifications.
The embodiments herein will be better understood from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, in which:
The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the embodiments herein. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the embodiments herein may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly, the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments herein.
The embodiments herein provide a modular power converter operating a plurality of power conversion modules. Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
As used herein:
“Power type” means electrical power that can be either DC power, single phase AC power, or three phase AC power, wherein in the case of AC power, the power could be real power, reactive (inductive or capacitive) power, or a combination of real and reactive power.
“Power conversion modes” means all the modes described herein in which PCMs may operate, including an inductive mode (PCM absorbs an amount of reactive power QVAR), a capacitive mode (PCM supplies an amount of reactive power QVAR), an efficient power mode (PCM is restricted to converting an amount of power PEFF), a variable power mode (PCM operates to convert a variable amount of power responsive to system requirements), a standby mode (PCM does not convert any power), an equal power mode (PCM converts a power of PREQ/N−1), a power maximization mode (PCM operates to maximize the output power of the power source), an equal power MPPT mode (PCM converts a power of MOD(PREQ/N−1), a complex power mode (PCM produces a combination of reactive and real power that sums to its maximum power capacity), and a self-test mode (PCM tests its ability to perform in the other various modes).
“Communication bus” means a bus that is used for operatively connecting the PCMs together. It is also used for operatively connecting a modular converter mode control module to the PCMs and is, thus, also referred to as a control bus whenever a modular converter mode control module is utilized.
“Power conversion” means converting one form of electrical power to another, such as, for example, AC to DC or DC to AC as well as correcting the power factor in the presence of large reactive loads.
Each PCM 1101, 1102, . . . 110N could be capable of performing the complete power conversion function of MPC 100. For example, if MPC 100 is a bidirectional three phase DC to AC converter, capable of converting three phase AC power to DC power and DC power to three phase AC power, then each PCM 1101, 1102, . . . 110N could also be capable of converting three phase AC power to DC power and DC power to three phase AC power.
In some embodiments, each PCM 1101, 1102, . . . 110N could be capable of performing part of the power conversion function of the complete MPC 100. For example, if MPC 100 is a bidirectional three phase DC to AC converter, capable of converting three phase AC power to DC power and DC power to three phase AC power, then each PCM 1101, 1102, . . . 110N could be capable of converting a single phase of the three phase AC power to DC power and DC power to a single phase of the three phase AC power. In this case, the number of PCMs 1101, 1102, . . . 110N in MPC 100 is a multiple of three.
In this embodiment, MPC 100 could perform a phase balancing function by providing differing amounts of power to each of the three phases. Phase balancing could be especially useful in a microgrid where large, single phase loads could otherwise unbalance the phases of the microgrid. In phase balancing, differing amounts of power are provided to each phase to maintain the root mean square (RMS) voltage values of the different phases substantially equal.
MPC mode control module 140 is coupled to control bus 220 via connection 116 for the selection and coordination of the operating modes of PCMs 1101, 1102, . . . 110N. MPC mode control module 140 is further described with respect to
PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could receive DC or AC power and could output DC or AC power. MPC 200 could therefore be a rectifier, an inverter, a DC to DC converter or an AC to AC converter. In the case of AC power, the power could be real power, reactive power, or a combination of real and reactive power. In the case that first or second power buses 222, 224 are AC power buses, they could be single phase or multiphase buses. Each PCM 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could be capable of performing the complete power conversion function of MPC 200. For example, if MPC 200 is a unidirectional single phase DC to AC converter capable of converting DC power to single phase AC power, then each PCM 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could also be capable of converting DC power to three phase AC power.
In some embodiments, each PCM 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could be capable of performing part of the power conversion function of the MPC 200. For example, if MPC 200 is a unidirectional DC to three phase AC inverter, capable of converting DC power to three phase AC power, then each PCM 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could be capable of converting DC power to single phase AC power. In this case, the number of PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N in MPC 200 is a multiple of three.
In this embodiment, MPC 200 could perform a phase balancing function by providing differing amounts of power to each of the three phases. Phase balancing could be especially useful in a microgrid where large, single phase loads could otherwise unbalance the microgrid.
MPC mode control module 240 is coupled to control bus 220 via connection 246 for the selection and coordination of the operating modes of PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N. MPC mode control module 240 is further described with respect to
VAr Compensator
MPC mode control module 340 is coupled to control bus 320 via connection 346 for the control of PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N. Each PCM 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could be capable of performing the complete power conversion function of VAr compensator 300. For example, if VAr compensator 300 is a three phase VAr compensator, capable of converting DC power to single phase AC power, then each PCM 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could also be capable of converting DC power to three phase AC power.
Alternatively, each PCM 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could be capable of performing part of the power conversion function of VAr compensator 300. For example, PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could be single phase VAr compensators and could supply or consume reactive power to or from one phase of a multiphase bus. MPC 300 could be a three phase VAr compensator and PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could individually supply or consume reactive power from or to the three phases of bus 322. In some embodiments, an equal number of PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could be connected to each phase of the bus 322. In other embodiments, 3101, 3102, . . . 310N could be switchably connected to all phases to allow any PCM to supply or consume power from any phase of the power bus 322.
Efficient VAr Compensation Method
The modular nature of VAr compensator 300 could allow for a simplified design of PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N. In one alternative mode of operation, PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N have only three power conversion operating modes: standby mode in which they do not produce or consume reactive power, inductive mode in which they absorb a fixed quantity of reactive power of magnitude QVAR, and capacitive mode in which they supply a fixed quantity of reactive power of magnitude QVAR. In this mode of operation, the PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N have only three static operating points and can be configured for optimal efficiency at these operating points.
In the efficient VAr compensation method, the selection of the PCMs to be in inductive, capacitive, or standby modes could be performed by mode control module 340. In the case where VAr compensator 300 is multiphase, the same method described above could be applied on a phase-by-phase basis. In response to a request to supply a quantity of reactive power QREQ,n to 0 the n-th phase of a multiphase bus, a number (NREQ,n) of PCMs 3101, 3102, . . . 310N connected to the n-th phase of the multiphase bus could be set to either capacitive or inductive mode where NREQ,n=MOD(QREQ,n)/QVAR+0.5). The remaining PCMs connected to the n-th phase of the bus could be set to standby.
AC Battery Storage System
Each PCM 4101, 4102, . . . 410N could be capable of performing the complete power conversion function of MPC 400. For example, if MPC 400 id a three phase battery management system, capable of converting DC power to three phase AC power and three phase AC power to DC power then each PCM 4101, 4102, . . . 410N could be capable of converting DC power to three phase AC power and three phase AC power to DC power. Alternatively, each PCM 4101, 4102, . . . 410N could be capable of performing part of the power conversion function of MPC 400. For example, PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N could be single phase bidirectional converters and could individually supply or consume power to or from one phase of a multiphase bus. In some embodiments, an equal number of PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N could be connected to each phase of the multiphase bus. In another embodiment, PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N are switchably connected to all phases of the multi-phase bus to allow any PCM to supply power to phase of the power bus.
MPC mode control module 440 is coupled to control bus 420 via connection 446 for the selection and coordination of the operating modes of PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N and the charging and maintenance of battery 452. PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N are capable of converting power autonomously. This means that once a PCM is set to a particular operating mode by MPC mode control module 440 it does not require any further control signals from MPC mode control module 440 to perform the power conversion function of that mode. PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N are capable of sensing the condition of first or second power buses 422, 424 and responding appropriately. For example, PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N are capable of sensing the voltage of DC bus 422 and supplying power to maintain that voltage. PCMs 4101, 4102, . . . 410N can also operate independently of one another. One PCM may be in one operating mode while another PCM may be in a different mode. For example, one PCM may be in a standby mode and may not be converting power while another PCM may be in a different mode and could be converting power.
Uninterruptable Power Supply
MPC 400 might also be employed as part of an uninterruptible power supply (UPS).
Multi-Function
The modular nature of an MPC could allow it to perform multiple power conversion functions by combining different types of PCMs.
In this example, MPC 500 comprises two different types of PCMs. PCMs 5101 . . . 510i are DC to DC converters and convert the variable DC voltage of PV panel array 554 to a DC voltage suitable for charging battery 552. PCMs 510i+1 . . . 510N are bidirectional DC to AC converters. They could convert the DC voltage of battery 552 to an AC voltage to supply power to electrical grid 550 or convert the AC voltage of electrical grid 550 to a DC voltage suitable for charging battery 552. PCMs 5101 . . . 510i and PCMs 510i+1 . . . 510N could be physically different modules with different circuit topologies and components or they could be physically identical modules and only controlled differently to function as DC to DC and DC to AC converters. PCMs 5101, 5102, . . . 510N are capable of converting power autonomously. This means that once a PCM is set to a particular operating mode by MPC mode control module 540 it does not require any further control signals from MPC mode control module 540 to perform the power conversion function of that mode.
Customization
The modular nature of MPC 100, 200, 300, 400 could make it easily customizable to a specific power conversion capacity requirement. In one exemplary mode of operation PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410 (PCMs are numbered herein without their subscripts for the sake of brevity and it should be understood that in this case the numbering without the subscript refers to all PCMs, e.g. 110 refers to PCMs 1101, 1102, . . . 110N) could be capable of performing the complete power conversion function of their respective MPC 100, 200, 300, 400 and could all have substantially equal power conversion capacities “PPCM”. If an application requires a maximum power conversion capacity of “C”, then the required number “K” of PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410 in MPC 100, 200, 300, 400 is:
For example, if a power conversion capacity of 50 kW is required, an MPC 100, 200, 400 could be provided comprising of one hundred PCMs 110, 210, 410 each with a capacity of 500 W. If a reactive power capacity of 50 kVAr is required, a VAr 300 compensator could be provided comprising of one hundred PCMs 310 each with a capacity of 500VAr.
The requisite number of PCMs could be assembled into a MPC more quickly and with less design effort compared to a custom designed monolithic power converter. The modular nature of a MPC could make it easily customizable to meet specific system requirements by combining PCMs of different types. For example, if a system requirement is the conversion of a quantity of DC power to AC power but also the supply of a quantity of reactive power, then an MPC could be readily assembled using the appropriate number of DC to AC and VAr compensator PCMs along with the required mode controller or islanding switch modules. For example, if the AC battery storage system of
The modular nature of MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could also make it easily scalable with increasing conversion requirements. The power conversion capacity of MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could be increased simply by adding additional PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510. This could require less effort, expense, and time than the alternative of replacement of an existing monolithic converter with a larger capacity monolithic converter. MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could be more tolerant of component failure than a monolithic power converter. In a monolithic power converter, the failure of a single component can cause the converter to fail. In MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 the failure of a single PCM 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 could only result in the loss of the failing PCM's conversion capacity rather than the loss of the complete power conversion capacity of the entire MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500.
The failure of MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 could however, cause MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 to fail. In some embodiments of the MPC, multiple MPC mode control modules and control buses are used to provide redundancy and prevent a failure of the MPC from a single MPC mode control module failure. Again with reference to
Physical Design
The modular design of MPCs 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could make their physical implementation compatible with a rack and cabinet design in which the various MPC modules (including PCMs, MPC mode control modules or islanding switch modules) are rack mountable and their electrical interconnection is supplied by the mounting rack.
Slots 6621, 6622, . . . 662M could be of identical physical dimensions (width, depth, and height) and PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510, MPC mode control modules 140, 240, 340, 440, 540, and islanding switch module 442, 542 could have compatible physical dimensions such that they or any other MPC modules could be inserted in any slot 6621, 6622, . . . 662M. Alternately, modules might be sized as multiples of the slot width such that a module could occupy an integer multiple of slots.
For MPC 500 of
Connectors 702, 704, 706, 708, 710, 712, 742, 750, 752, 762, 766, 770, 782, 786, 788, 792 could be implemented with any of a variety of known connector technologies, such as for example, a keyed socket and plug, blade and socket or pin and socket connectors. Control buses 120, 220, 320, 420 and power buses 122, 124, 222, 224, 322, 422, 424 could be physically implemented in rear surface 664 of power shelf 660. Control buses 120, 220, 320, 420 could use any of a variety of known cabling technology such as, for example, ribbon cables or Ethernet cables. Power buses 122, 124, 222, 224, 322, 422, 424 could be physically implemented in a variety of known power technologies such as copper bus bars, stranded insulated wiring or solid insulated wiring. Shelf 660 could be designed to be compatible with any of the standard telecom or computer cabinetry such as but not limited to the Electronic Industries Alliance 310, 19 inch wide cabinet, or the European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 600 mm wide cabinet.
In some embodiments PCMs 6101, 6102, . . . 610N and MPC mode control module 640 are “hot swappable” and can be added to power shelf 660 without powering down MPC 600. The modular nature of MPC 600 could also make it easily customizable to a specific power conversion capacity. The requisite number of PCMs could easily be added to power shelf 660 to meet the total power conversion capacity requirement up to the space limit (M) of the shelf. If additional capacity is required a power cabinet comprising of multiple power shelves could be used.
The repair of MPC 600 could be simpler and faster than the repair of a monolithic power converter and could simply involve swapping of the failed module for a new module. The spare parts inventory for MPC 600 could also be smaller than for a monolithic converter. For example, the spare parts inventory for MPC 400 of
The production volumes of PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 could also be larger than the production volumes of monolithic converters. This could allow MPCs 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 to enjoy the cost benefits of automation and volume manufacturing.
Operation
PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are capable of converting power autonomously. This means that once a PCMs is set to a particular operating mode by its mode control module it does not require any further control signals from its mode control module to perform the power conversion function of that mode. PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are capable of sensing the condition of first and/or second power buses 122, 124, 224, 226, 322, 422, 424, 522, 524 and responding appropriately. For example, in
Efficient Power Method
The operation of individual PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 in MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could be beneficially coordinated by having mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 select the PCM operating modes. Coordination could enable power efficient converter operation by only activating enough power conversion capacity to meet the power conversion requirement. In one embodiment, PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 in MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 are designed to have their point of maximum efficiency PEFF substantially at their maximum power conversion capacity (P). A power converter's efficiency is defined as the ratio of power output divided by power input. A power converter's maximum power conversion capacity is generally specified by the manufacturer and represents the safe operating limit of the converter. For a required amount of total power conversion “PREQ”, a number (NON) of PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 could each be restricted to only convert an amount of power PEFF When a PCM is restricted to only convert an amount of power PEFF it is referred to as operating in “efficient power” mode. NON is given by the formula: NON=MOD(PREQ/PEFF).
The remaining required power (PREQ−NON×PEFF) is referred to as the “remainder power” and could be converted by an additional “remainder” PCM 110, 210, 410, 510 operating in a “variable power” mode. When a PCM operates to convert a variable amount of power responsive to system requirements it is referred to as operating in a “variable power” mode. Such system requirements could be, for example, power demand from a load, storage device or electrical grid or power production from a power generator with a variable power output such as, for example, a PV panel array or a wind turbine. Another system requirement could be a reactive power demand from a utility grid or microgrid. The remaining PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 could operate in a “standby” mode. In standby mode, a PCM does not convert any power. The power dissipation of a PCM in standby mode could be designed to be substantially zero. In the efficient power method, all PCMs not in standby operate at their maximum efficiency except for the remainder PCM operating in variable power mode. The efficiency of the MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 could be maximized with this method.
In one embodiment MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 is responsible for selecting which PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 operate in efficient power mode, variable power mode, and standby.
In another embodiment the remainder power is provided by a special purpose “remainder” PCM which could be optimized to have a flat power efficiency curve across its entire power range rather than a point of maximum efficiency substantially at PMAX.
Equal Power Method
In some embodiments, the maximum efficiency PEFF of PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 could be sufficiently smaller than their maximum power conversion capacity (PMAX) such that with all PCMs in MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 operating at PEFF there is still significant additional power conversion capacity available to meet a remaining power requirement. In this case, to supply the required power at optimal efficiency, the power requirement could be uniformly distributed over all “N” PCMs in the MPC in an “equal power” method. The power assigned to an individual PCM in the equal power method is (PEQ) where PEQ=PREQ/N.
When a PCM is operated to convert an amount of power PEQ this is referred to as “equal power” mode.
Power Maximization Method
MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 could also be operated in a power maximization method. In the power maximization method, at least one of the PCMs 110, 210, 410, 510 is operated in a “power maximization” mode. In the power maximization mode, the PCM operates to maximize power production of a power generator by varying either its input current or voltage. For example, in an embodiment of unidirectional MPC 200, MPC 200 is an inverter with input power bus 222 operatively connected to a PV panel array. At least one of PCM 2101, 2102, . . . 210N could operate a MPPT algorithm/process and vary its input current or input voltage to maximize the power production of the PV panel array by operating the PV panel array at its maximum power point (MPP). The MPP of a PV array is the point on its current versus voltage curve that corresponds to maximum output power. Typically, the MPP will change over the course of a day as the insolation of the panel array changes. An MPPT algorithm locates the MPP of a PV array at the MPP by perturbing either the PV panel array's output voltage or output current and determining whether this increases or decreases the output power.
In an embodiment of a power maximization method, a number (NON defined above) of PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N operate in the efficient power mode and the remainder PCM converts the remainder power and operates an MPPT algorithm in the power maximization mode. All other PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N operate in standby mode. In an embodiment, MPC mode control module 240 determines which PCMs 2101, 2102, . . . 210N operate in the efficient power mode, power maximization mode, and standby mode.
Equal Power MPPT Method
In some embodiments, the maximum efficiency PEFF of the PCMs could be sufficiently smaller than their maximum power conversion capacity (PMAX) such that even with all PCMs in an MPC operating at PEFF the power output of the PV array is larger than the maximum efficient power of the MPC and the MPC still has significant additional power conversion capacity available. In this case, the MPC could be operated in an “equal power MPPT” method. In this method, N−1 of the PCMs are all operated in an “equal power MPPT” mode. In the equal power MPPT mode, a PCM converts an amount of power (PEQMPPT), where PEQMPPT=MOD(PREQ/N−1). The remaining PCM is operated in power maximization mode and converts the remainder power and operates the MPPT algorithm.
Reactive Power Method
In one embodiment, MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 uses its remaining power conversion capacity to meet a reactive power request by activating PCMs in standby to produce or consume reactive power. The remaining modular power conversion capacity of the MPC is the total power conversion capacity of all PCMs in standby mode. In this embodiment, PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are capable of four quadrant operation and can operate in a “reactive power” mode. In the reactive power mode, a PCM 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 supplies or consumes only reactive power. In the various embodiments, MPC mode control modules 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 are responsible for selecting which PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are in reactive power mode and the amount of reactive power assigned to individual PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510.
where QMAX is the maximum reactive power capacity of a PCM. At step 1066, it is determined if the number of PCMs required to meet the reactive power request is less than the number of PCMs currently in standby mode (NSTANDBY). If it is less than NSTANDBY, then NON,Q PCMs are activated at step 1068 to reactive power mode to each produce an amount of reactive power QMAX. If the number of PCMs required to meet the reactive power request is not less than the number of PCMs in standby mode, then NSTANDBY PCMs are activated at step 1069 to each produce an amount of reactive power QMAX.
Complex Power Method
In one embodiment, MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 produces complex power. Complex power is a combination of real and reactive power and is characterized by a power factor (PF) which is the ratio of real power to the apparent power. In this embodiment, PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are capable of four quadrant operation and could operate in a “complex power” mode. In complex power mode, a PCM produces complex power. In one embodiment, MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 determines which PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 are in complex power mode and the power factor of each individual PCM 110, 210, 310, 410, 510.
Q
REM,i=√{square root over (PMAX2−Pi2)}
where PMAX is the maximum power capacity of a PCM and Pi is the amount of power being converted by the i-th PCM. At step 1076, the PCM with the largest value of remaining reactive power is activated to its maximum power capacity by controlling it to produce its remaining reactive power QREM,i in addition to its real power (Pi). At step 1078, it is determined if the reactive power request has been satisfied by the MPC. If the request is satisfied the process terminates at step 1080. If the request has not been satisfied, it is determined at step 1082 whether the MPC has remaining reactive power capacity. If “NO” at step 1082, then the process terminates at step 1080. If “YES” at step 1082, then the PCM with the next largest value of QREM,i is activated at step 1076.
Self-Test
In one embodiment, MPC 100, 200, 400, 500 performs a self-test of its functions. In this embodiment, PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 could operate in a “self-test” mode. In the self-test mode, individual PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 could perform a test of their functional status and communicate a test result. Their functional status could be their ability to operate in efficient power mode, variable power mode, equal power mode, power maximization mode, equal power MPPT mode, reactive power mode, complex power mode, or other operating modes. A test result could be a pass/fail condition.
Control Bus
Control bus 120, 220, 320, 420, 520 in MPC 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 could be serial or parallel and could carry data and/or instructions. For example, MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 could issue commands to PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 and PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 could send measurement data to MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 over control bus 120, 220, 320, 420, 520. Control bus 120, 220, 320, 420, 520 could use one of a number of common communication protocols including inter-integrated circuit (I2C), serial peripheral interface (SPI) bus. Control bus 120, 220, 320, 420, 520 could also be a point-to-point bus with dedicated connections between MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 and each PCM 110, 210, 310, 410, 510.
MPC Mode Control Module
In one embodiment, MPC mode control module 140, 240, 340, 440, 540 controls the operating modes of PCMs 110, 210, 310, 410, 510.
PCM
The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.