Sampling hydrocarbon fluids from subterranean formations involves positioning a formation sampling tool in a borehole adjacent a formation, sealing an interval of the borehole along the tool and adjacent the formation and extracting sample fluid from the formation. The sample fluid may then be evaluated (e.g., downhole and/or at the surface of the Earth) to facilitate drilling and/or hydrocarbon production operations. Some formation sampling tools include a single flowline architecture and pumpout sections above and below a probe module via which formation fluid is extracted from a formation. Some other formation sampling tools may provide a dual flowline architecture to enable focused sampling with a probe having a sample inlet and a guard inlet. However, these dual flowline sampling tools often use pumpout modules dedicated to either a sample flowline or a guard flowline.
The present disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with the standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of the various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion.
It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments or examples for implementing different features of various embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed. Moreover, the formation of a first feature over or on a second feature in the description that follows may include embodiments in which the first and second features are formed in direct contact, and may also include embodiments in which additional features may be formed interposing the first and second features such that the first and second features may not be in direct contact.
One or more aspects of the present disclosure relate to modular pumpouts and flowline architecture. More specifically, the example apparatus and methods described herein may be used, for example, to provide a highly modular and operationally flexible formation sampling tool and/or formation tester. In particular, the examples described herein may generally include a formation sampling tool or tester having a dual flowline architecture in which multiple pumpouts or pump modules are interconnected via valves (e.g., valve assemblies) and/or fluid routing modules to enable various formation cleanup and/or focused sampling operations to be performed by a single formation tester.
The cleanup operations that may be performed using the examples described herein include a co-mingled flow cleanup using any one of multiple pumpouts or pump modules. Thus, in the event that one or more pump modules are inoperative, the examples described herein enable fluid routing or re-routing to permit any remaining operative pump module(s) to perform the cleanup operation. The flowline architecture of the examples described herein also enables multiple pump modules to be fluidly coupled in a bus-like manner to enable the pumping capacities of the pump modules to be added. Thus, in the case multiple pumps are operated simultaneously in this manner to perform, for example, a co-mingled flow cleanup operation, the cleanup operation can proceed more rapidly due to the combined capacity of (i.e., the volume of fluid pumped or extracted by) the multiple pump modules. The examples described herein also enable cleanup operations to be performed using multiple pump modules in a split flow configuration.
The sampling operations that may be performed using the examples described herein include a split flow focused sampling operation using multiple pump modules and/or a co-mingled flow focused sampling operation using any one of multiple pump modules. The examples described herein may be used to acquire the fluid samples in a low shock mode and/or a reverse low shock mode. Further, the flowline architecture and flexible fluid routing or re-routing capabilities of the examples described herein enable mitigation of a failed pump module in a sampling operation such that an operative pump module can perform the sampling operation.
The dual flowline architecture of the examples described herein also provides a second flowline in each of the pump modules where the second flowline is isolated from a pump within the pump module, a valve or valves coupled to the first pump and, more generally, the first flowline. Such isolation of the second flowline from the first flowline and, particularly, the pump, enables routing of fluid through the second flowline of the pump module in response to, for example, a failure of the pump without the possibility of any stagnant fluid in the failed or inoperative pump contaminating the fluid flowing through the second flowline.
In the examples described herein, the pumpouts or pump modules are located on one side (e.g., uphole) of a focused sampling probe module. However, other locations of the pump modules (e.g., downhole relative to a sampling probe module) can be employed without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Additionally, the modular pumpouts or pump modules described herein are mechanically interchangeable and are not uniquely associated with sample or guard flowlines. Further, while the example modular pumpouts or pump modules described herein are mechanically interchangeable, the pump modules may have the same or different specifications or characteristics such as pumping capacities or rates, pressure ratings, etc. Thus, a downhole tool including a plurality of these modular pump modules having different specifications may be operated to selectively operate these pump modules to adapt to different sampling environments that may be encountered within a given borehole (e.g., during a given run) and/or among multiple boreholes. Still further, while the examples described herein depict pump modules in which the pumps contained therein have outlets coupled to fluid exit ports on the pump module. However, such exit ports could be located on any other portion of a downhole tool without departing from the scope of this disclosure.
As used herein, the terms “valve” and “valve assembly” refer to one or more components or devices that may be used to control or change the flow of a substance or fluid. Thus, in some cases a valve or valve assembly may be implemented using a single valve body or housing, while in other cases, a valve assembly may be implemented using multiple valve bodies or housings that have been fluidly coupled as needed to perform the desired valve function. More specifically, for example, a valve or valve assembly having three ports could be implemented using a single valve body providing three fluid connections. However, without departing from the scope of this disclosure, such a valve or valve assembly could instead be implemented using multiple valve bodies and/or other devices that are fluidly coupled to perform the same function of the aforementioned three-port valve.
As illustrated in
In the example depicted in
The example bottom hole assembly 100 of
The example LWD tool 120 and/or the example MWD module 130 of
The logging and control computer 160 may include a user interface that enables parameters to be input and or outputs to be displayed that may be associated with the drilling operation and/or a formation F traversed by the borehole 11. While the logging and control computer 160 is depicted uphole and adjacent the wellsite system, a portion or all of the logging and control computer 160 may be positioned in the bottom hole assembly 100 and/or in a remote location.
The wireline tool 200 also includes a formation tester 214, which may be constructed to embody one or more aspects of the example modular pumpouts or pump modules and/or flowline architecture described herein. The formation tester 214 may include a selectively extendable fluid admitting assembly 216 and a selectively extendable tool anchoring member 218 that are respectively arranged on opposite sides of the body 208. The fluid admitting assembly 216 is to selectively seal off or isolate selected portions of the wall of the wellbore 202 to fluidly couple to the adjacent formation F and draw fluid samples from the formation F. The formation tester 214 also includes a fluid analysis module 220 through which the obtained fluid samples flow. The fluid may thereafter be expelled through a port (not shown) or it may be sent to one or more fluid collecting chambers 222 and 224, which may receive and retain the formation fluid for subsequent testing at the surface or a testing facility.
In the illustrated example, the electrical control and data acquisition system 206 and/or the downhole control system 212 are to control the fluid admitting assembly 216 to draw fluid samples from the formation F and to control the fluid analysis module 220 to measure the fluid samples. In some example implementations, the fluid analysis module 220 may analyze the measurement data of the fluid samples as described herein. In other example implementations, the fluid analysis module 220 may generate and store the measurement data and subsequently communicate the measurement data to the surface for analysis at the surface. Although the downhole control system 212 is shown as being implemented separate from the formation tester 214, in some example implementations, the downhole control system 212 may be implemented in the formation tester 214. Additionally, the formation tester 214 may include one or more pumpouts or pump modules (not shown) to facilitate the collection of fluid samples.
One or more modules or tools of the example drill string 12 shown in
The focused probe module 302 includes a packer 318 to engage a wall 320 of a wellbore or borehole 322. The packer 318 has a sample inlet 324 and guard inlets 326 and 328 into which fluid from a formation F may be drawn as indicated by the arrows. The focused probe module 302 also includes a plurality of valve assemblies or valves 330 coupled to a guard flowline 332 (which is coupled to the guard inlets 326 and 328) and an evaluation or sample flowline 334 (which is coupled to the sample inlet 324).
The lower fluid analysis module 304 is mechanically and fluidly coupled to the focused probe module 302. The lower fluid analysis module 304 includes a fluid analyzer (e.g., an optical fluid analyzer) 336 to, for example, facilitate a determination of whether a cleanup operation in connection with the formation F is sufficiently complete. As shown in
The lower fluid routing module 314 includes first and second inlets 344 and 346, first and second outlets 348 and 350, and first and second valves 352 and 354. Each of the first and second valves 352 and 354 has respective first, second and third ports, which are numbered “1,” “2” and “3,” respectively, for reference in
The upper fluid analysis module 306 is similar or identical to the lower fluid analysis module 304 and, thus, also includes a fluid analyzer 355, which may be different than or identical to the fluid analyzer 336. As noted above, the valves 352 and 354 may be operated to cause fluid to be routed adjacent the fluid analyzer 355 of the upper fluid analysis module 306 via a leftmost flowline 356 and/or may be routed via a rightmost flowline 358 which does not subject any fluid therein to a fluid analysis by the fluid analyzer 355.
The sample carrier module 308 includes a sample chamber 360, a relief valve 362 and a sampling valve 364. A piston 366 of the sample bottle or chamber 360 may initially be in the position shown in
The middle fluid routing module 315 is identical to the lower fluid routing module 314 and, thus, includes first and second valves 374 and 376 that are fluidly coupled to first and second inlets 378 and 380 and first and second outlets 382 and 384 as described above in connection with the lower fluid routing module 314.
The lower pumpout or pump module 310 includes a pump 386, a valve 388, first and second inlets 390 and 392, and first, second and third outlets 394, 396 and 398. The pump 386, the valve 388, the first inlet 390 and the second outlet 396 form at least part of or are fluidly coupled to a first flowline, and the second inlet 392 is fluidly coupled to the third outlet via a second flowline 400, which is fluidly isolated from the first flowline. An inlet of the pump 386 is fluidly coupled to the first inlet 390, and an outlet of the pump 386 is fluidly coupled to the first outlet 394. While the first outlet 394 is depicted as being located on the pump module 310, this outlet 394 could be located in any other location on the tester or tool 300. The valve 388 has first, second and third ports, which have been labeled as “1,” “2” and “3,” respectively for reference. As shown, the first port is fluidly coupled to the first inlet 390, the second port is fluidly coupled to the first outlet 394 and the pump outlet, and the third port is fluidly coupled to the second outlet 396. Also, as shown, the first and second outlets 382 and 384 of the middle fluid routing module 308 are fluidly coupled to the first and second inlets 390 and 392, respectively, of the lower pump module 310.
The upper fluid routing module 316 interposes the upper and lower pump modules 312 and 310 and is identical to the middle and lower fluid routing modules 315 and 314 and, thus, includes first and second valves 402 and 404 fluidly coupled to first and second inlets 406 and 408 and first and second outlets 410 and 412 as described in connection with the lower fluid routing module 314 above. Further, the upper pump module 312 is similar or identical to the lower pump module 310 and, thus, includes a pump 414, a valve 416, first and second inlets 418 and 420, and first, second and third outlets 422, 424 and 426. As shown, the first and second inlets 418 and 420 of the upper pump module 312 are fluidly coupled to the first and second outlets 410 and 412, respectively, of the upper fluid routing module 316.
The pumps 414 and 386 of the upper and lower pump modules 312 and 310, respectively, may have identical characteristics or different characteristics to suit the needs of particular applications. For example, the pumps 414 and 386 may have identical or different pumping rates, pressure ratings, etc. Thus, during operations of the formation tester 300, the fluid routing modules 314, 315 and 316 and the pumps 414 and 386 may be selectively operated in accordance with the characteristics of the pumps 414 and 386 based on the operating environment to which the formation tester 300 is exposed and/or the operation to be performed by the formation tester 300.
The number and arrangement of fluid routing modules and pump modules shown in
In the example of
Various additional operational modes of the example formation tester 300 are depicted in
The pump module architecture 1200 shown in
As can be appreciated, the foregoing disclosure introduces an apparatus comprising a downhole tool to sample fluid from a subterranean formation, and a plurality of fluidly coupled pump modules disposed on the downhole tool. Each pump modules may include: a pump having a pump inlet and a pump outlet, where the pump inlet is coupled to a first flowline; a first valve assembly having first, second and third ports, wherein the first port is coupled to the first flowline, the second port is coupled to the pump outlet, and the third port is coupled to the first flowline; and a second flowline not fluidly coupled to the first valve assembly or the pump. The apparatus may further include a fluid routing module fluidly coupled to at least one of the pump modules. The fluid routing module may include: second and third valve assemblies, each having respective first, second and third ports; first and second fluid inlets; and first and second fluid outlets, wherein the first ports of the second and third valve assemblies are coupled to the first fluid outlet, the second ports of the second and third valve assemblies are coupled to the second fluid outlet, the third port of the second valve assembly is coupled to the first fluid inlet and the third port of the third valve assembly is coupled to the second fluid inlet. The first fluid outlet may be coupled to the first flowline of one of the pump modules and the second fluid outlet may be coupled to the second flowline of the one of the pump modules. The first fluid inlet may be coupled to the first flowline of another one of the pump modules and the second fluid inlet may be coupled to the second flowline of the other one of the pump modules. Each of the first flowlines may fluidly couple a first inlet and first outlet of each pump module, each of the second flowlines may fluidly couple a second inlet and second outlet of each of the pump modules, and each of the pump outlets may fluidly couple to a third outlet of each of the pump modules. At least one of the pumps may have a different characteristic than another one of the pumps. The characteristic may be a pump rate or a pressure rating. Two or more of the pumps may be operated simultaneously to, for example, increase a rate at which a volume of fluid is extracted from the formation and/or to perform one or more of a cleanup operation, a sampling operation or a fluid analysis operation.
The disclosure also introduces an apparatus comprising: a pump module to be incorporated in a downhole tool. The pump module may include: a pump having a pump inlet and a pump outlet, the pump inlet to be coupled to a first flowline and the pump outlet to be coupled to an outlet to enable the pump to pump fluid into a wellbore; a valve having first, second and third ports, the first port to be coupled to the first flowline, the second port to be coupled to the outlet and the third port to be coupled to the first flowline, wherein the valve and the pump form at least part of the first flowline; and a second flowline not fluidly coupled to first flowline. The first flowline fluidly may fluidly couple a first inlet of the pump module to a second outlet of the pump module, and the second flowline may fluidly couple a second inlet of the pump module to a third outlet of the pump module. The pump module may be coupled to at least one of another pump module or a fluid routing module.
The disclosure also introduces a method involving lowering a tool into a wellbore adjacent a formation, engaging a probe of the tool to a wall of the wellbore adjacent the formation, where the probe has a first fluid inlet and a second fluid inlet. The first fluid inlet is coupled to a first flowline within the tool and the second fluid inlet is coupled to a second flowline. The method also involves operating a first pump in a first pump module of the tool, operating a second pump in a second pump module of the tool, where the second pump operates at the same time as the first pump, drawing fluid from the formation via the first and second pumps during operation of the pumps. The drawn fluid flows through the inlets of the probe into the first and second flowlines and merges into a third flowline, and wherein the fluid drawn through the third flowline by the pumps flows through the first pump module to reach the second pump module and a portion of the drawn fluid exits the first pump and another portion of the drawn fluid exits the second pump. Drawing the fluid from the formation via the first and second pumps during operation of the pumps may comprise performing a cleanup operation and may further comprise performing a fluid analysis of the drawn fluid to identify a completion of the cleanup operation. The method may further involve selectively operating at least one of the pumps to perform a sampling operation following the completion of the cleanup operation. Selectively operating at least one of the pumps to perform the sampling operation may comprise operating the first and second pumps to perform a split flow focused sampling operation or operating one of the first pump or the second pump to perform a co-mingled flow focused sampling operation. The method may further comprise routing the drawn fluid via a fluid routing module to the first pump module and/or routing the drawn fluid via a second fluid routing module to the second pump module.
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from this disclosure. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only as structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may be not structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secured wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a screw may be equivalent structures. It is the express intent of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words “means for” together with an associated function.
The Abstract at the end of this disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b) to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/426,573, filed on Dec. 23, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/690,231, filed on Jan. 20, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/609,384, filed on Dec. 12, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/219,244, filed on Sep. 2, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,484,563, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/711,187, filed on Aug. 31, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,178,591, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/076,567, filed on Mar. 9, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,012, which is a division of application Ser. No. 10/184,833, filed on Jun. 28, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,301, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/478,819, filed on Jun. 5, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3121459 | Van Ness, Jr. et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
3295615 | Brieger et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3323361 | Lebourg | Jun 1967 | A |
3352361 | Urbanosky | Nov 1967 | A |
3385364 | Whitten | May 1968 | A |
3430181 | Urbanosky | Feb 1969 | A |
3430711 | Taggart | Mar 1969 | A |
3530933 | Whitten | Sep 1970 | A |
3565169 | Bell | Feb 1971 | A |
3611799 | Davis | Oct 1971 | A |
3653436 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3677081 | Newton et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3782191 | Whitten | Jan 1974 | A |
3813936 | Urbanosky et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3859851 | Urbanosky | Jan 1975 | A |
3864970 | Bell | Feb 1975 | A |
3924463 | Urbanosky | Dec 1975 | A |
3934468 | Brieger | Jan 1976 | A |
3952588 | Whitten | Apr 1976 | A |
4246782 | Hallmark | Jan 1981 | A |
4287946 | Brieger | Sep 1981 | A |
4339948 | Hallmark | Jul 1982 | A |
4369654 | Hallmark | Jan 1983 | A |
4392376 | Lagus et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4402910 | Smith et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4416152 | Wilson | Nov 1983 | A |
4492862 | Grynberg et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4513612 | Shalek | Apr 1985 | A |
4535843 | Jageler | Aug 1985 | A |
4573532 | Blake | Mar 1986 | A |
4635717 | Jageler | Jan 1987 | A |
4680581 | Kozlik et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4690216 | Pritchard | Sep 1987 | A |
4860580 | Durocher | Aug 1989 | A |
4860581 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4879900 | Gilbert | Nov 1989 | A |
4931343 | Becker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936139 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4951749 | Carroll | Aug 1990 | A |
4994671 | Safinya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5056959 | Cannac et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5166747 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5230244 | Gilbert | Jul 1993 | A |
5265015 | Auzerais et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266800 | Mullins | Nov 1993 | A |
5279153 | Dussan V. et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5303775 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5331156 | Hines et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335542 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337838 | Sorensen | Aug 1994 | A |
5377755 | Michaels et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5517464 | Lerner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5540280 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5587525 | Shwe et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622223 | Vasquez | Apr 1997 | A |
5765637 | Dietle et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770798 | Georgi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799733 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803186 | Berger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826662 | Beck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859430 | Mullins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5923171 | Koelman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934374 | Hrametz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5939717 | Mullins | Aug 1999 | A |
6157893 | Berger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164126 | Ciglenec et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176323 | Weirich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178815 | Felling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216662 | Sapsford | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223822 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
6230557 | Ciglenec et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6274865 | Schroer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343507 | Felling et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350966 | Potthof et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350986 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415864 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435279 | Howe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437326 | Yamate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467544 | Brown et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474152 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476384 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478096 | Jones et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6568487 | Meister et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585045 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609568 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622554 | Manke et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627873 | Tchakarov et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658930 | Abbas | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659177 | Bolze et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668924 | Bolze et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6707556 | Turner et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714872 | DiFoggio et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719049 | Sherwood et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722432 | Spiers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729399 | Follini et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745835 | Fields | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768105 | Mullins et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769296 | Montalvo et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6871713 | Meister et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877559 | Hashem | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6905241 | Zazovsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6964301 | Hill et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7090012 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096976 | Paluch et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114562 | Fisseler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140436 | Grant et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7178591 | Del Campo et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7484563 | Zazovsky et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7857049 | Sherwood | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010035312 | Han et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020100585 | Spiers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112854 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185313 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189339 | Montalvo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042021 | Bolze et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030042024 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030145652 | Arian | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030217845 | Sherwood et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030234120 | Paluch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000433 | Hill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040083805 | Ramakrishnan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099443 | Meister et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040163808 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178336 | DiFoggio | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231842 | Shammai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050039527 | Dhruva et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050109538 | Fisseler et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171699 | Zazovsky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182566 | DiFoggio | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060000603 | Zazovsky et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060042793 | Del Campo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076132 | Nold et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117842 | Ramakrishnan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070209793 | Nold, III et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080245569 | Nold, III et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090025926 | Briquet et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044951 | Milkovisch et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090321072 | Kanayama et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2400910 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2417506 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2418938 | Apr 2006 | GB |
9603628 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9530628 | Oct 1996 | WO |
0050876 | Aug 2000 | WO |
03098639 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004020982 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2005065277 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Wireline Formation Testing and Sampling”, Schlumberger Limited, 1996, pp. 4-1 to 4-47. |
Akram, et al., “A Model to Predict Wireline Formation Tester Sample Contamination”, SPE 48959, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 27-30, 1998, pp. 27-33. |
Crombie, et al., “Innovations in Wireline Fluid Sampling”, Oilfield Review, 1998, pp. 26-41. |
Dong, et al., “In-Situ Contaminaton Monitoring and GOR Measurement of Formation Fluid Samples”, SPE 77899, SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, 2002, pp. 1-9. |
Hammond, P.S., “One or Two Phased Flow During Fluid Sampling by a Wireline Tool”, Transport in Porous Media, vol. 6(3), 1991, pp. 299-330. |
Hashem, et al., “Determination of Producible Hydrocarbon Type and Oil Quality in Wells Drilled with Synthetic Oil-Based Muds”, SPE Reservoir Eval. & Eng. 2, Apr. 1999, pp. 125-133. |
Mullins, et al., “Optimization of Wireline Sample Quality by Real-Time Analysis of Oil-Based Mud Contamination—Examples from North Sea Opertions”, SPE 71736, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
Mullins, et al., “Real-Time Determination of Filtrate Contamination During Openhole Wireline Sampling by Optical Spectroscopy”, SPE 63071—SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, Oct. 1-4, 2000, pp. 1-13. |
Mullins, et al., “Real-Time Determination of OBM Filtrate Contamination During Openhole Wireline Sampling”, E & P Exchange, Feb. 2001, pp. 24-26. |
Skibin, et al., “Self-Similarity in Contamination Transport to a Formation Fluid Tester During Cleanup Production”, Transport in Porous Med., vol. 83 (1), 2009, pp. 55-72. |
Smits, A. R. , “In-Situ Optical Fluid Analysis as an Aid to Wireline Formation Sampling”, SPE Formation Evaluation, vol. 10 (2), Jun. 1995, pp. 91-98. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120132419 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61426573 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10184833 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11076567 | US | |
Parent | 13304971 | US | |
Child | 11076567 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12690231 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13304971 | US | |
Parent | 11609384 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12690231 | US | |
Parent | 11219244 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11609384 | US | |
Parent | 10711187 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11219244 | US | |
Parent | 11076567 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 10711187 | US | |
Parent | 12478819 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13304971 | US |