The present disclosure relates to a humeral implant and more specifically relates to a method and apparatus for adjusting the height and/or the angle of the humeral implant.
Trauma to the elbow joint frequently involves damage to the ligamentous support of the elbow and fractures of the osseous structures responsible for the skeletal integrity of the elbow joint. The proximal aspect of the radius, or radial head, is frequently injured either in isolation or in combination with injury to other bony or ligamentous structures of the elbow joint. The radial head may also be fractured in association with injuries to the forearm axis, including disruptions of the interosseous membrane between the radius and the ulna. Whether in isolation or in combination with other injuries, fractures of the radial head can be difficult to treat.
Fractures of the radial head are either reconstructable or unreconstructable. Despite various technical advances in the reconstruction of radial head fractures, a certain percentage of fractures are not amenable to reconstruction due to the degree of comminution or severity of the fracture. In general, unreconstructable radial head fractures result from high energy trauma and are therefore frequently associated with significant injuries to other osseous or ligamentous structures of the elbow joint or forearm. In these cases, restoration of the stabilizing function of the radial head is critical to allow the ligaments of the elbow or forearm to heal in appropriate relationships, thereby restoring stability to the elbow or forearm. This stabilizing function depends, in part, upon re-establishing the appropriate distance between the capitellum and the proximal shaft of the radius.
Prosthetic replacement of the radial head has evolved rather slowly. The first widely used prosthetic radial head was introduced in the 1970's and was composed of silicone. Silicone implants placed in various joints throughout the body led to “silicone synovitis,” in which the silicone induced an inflammatory response within the joint. Further, silicone radial head prostheses were found to be incapable of resisting the stresses to which the radial head is subjected, rendering it less useful in stabilizing the injured elbow or forearm.
The difficulties apparent with silicone led to experimentation with metal radial head implants. These prostheses are fashioned from a single piece of metal (often titanium) and include a stem and a head portion. The head portion is shaped to approximate the anatomy of the radial head. These metallic prostheses are capable of resisting the compressive stresses to which the radial head is subjected, as has been demonstrated in several biomechanical studies. However, significant problems remain with these prostheses.
Anatomic and radiographic studies of the dimensions of the radial head reveal a disparity with currently available metallic prostheses. Therefore it has been difficult to restore appropriate anatomic alignments within the elbow. Therefore restoration of the appropriate relationship between the capitellum and proximal shaft of the radius has been very difficult to achieve with these prostheses. Additionally, the fact that these prostheses are fashioned from a single piece of metal has led to technical difficulties with insertion and removal. Surgeons have had difficulty with matching both the size of the stem to the canal of the proximal radius and the size of the head portion to the patient's native radial head. Removal of these non-modular components frequently requires release of the lateral ligaments of the elbow and the annular ligament, which binds the neck of the proximal radius to the proximal ulna. Thus the elbow is frequently destabilized during removal of these prostheses.
Designers of prosthetic joint replacements in the hip, shoulder, knee and fingers have circumvented the above mentioned difficulties by employing the use of modular components. Modularity allows for each aspect of a prosthesis to be sized appropriately to its recipient anatomic site. The concept of modularity has only recently been applied to commercially available radial head prostheses. Currently available modular radial head prostheses employ a mechanism by which the head component is impacted over and onto the stem component. The surgical exposure must therefore allow sufficient room for the head to be maneuvered over the stem prior to being impacted. With impaction, the height of the prosthesis may be decreased, resulting in an increased distance between the capitellum and the proximal end of the radius. Increasing this distance alters the bony anatomy such that the ligaments of the elbow joint are not held in their appropriate lengths and tensions. Instability of the elbow or inappropriate healing of the ligaments may result. Furthermore, removal of these prostheses is accomplished in the same manner as the above mentioned metallic implants, often requiring destabilization of the lateral aspect of the elbow joint.
In order to reap the benefits of modularity in radial head prosthetic replacement, a reliable and surgically appropriate method to secure the stem of the prosthesis to the head of the prosthesis and which allows for accurate restoration of the appropriate spatial relationships between the bones of the elbow is required.
In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, a method for implanting a prosthesis system for replacement of a head portion of a proximal radius is provided. The method can include determining a distance between a proximal radius and a humerus. The method can also include selecting one of a first head component or a second head component based on the determination. The first and second head components can have unique heights. The method can further include connecting the selected first or second head component to an articulation component and connecting a stem component to the selected first or second head component.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a method for implanting a prosthesis system for replacement of a head portion of a proximal radius is provided. The method can include determining a distance between a proximal radius and a humerus. The method can also include selecting an articulation component and a head component based on the determination. The articulation component can have a first connection portion. The head component can have a second connection portion. The method can further include reducing a dimension of one of the articulation component or the head component from a first size to a second size. The method can also include advancing one of the articulation component or the head component into contact with the other of the articulation component or head component and returning the dimension to the first size such that the first and second connection portions interlock.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application or uses.
Before the present disclosure is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular configurations, process steps and materials disclosed herein as these may vary to some degree. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting as the scope of the present disclosure. The disclosure will be limited only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, singular forms of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
“Radial head” is defined as the essentially cylindrical protrusion found at the proximal end of a radius bone. The term “radial head” can also be used to modify or describe the prosthesis of the present disclosure.
“Longitudinal axis” is an imaginary line that is defined by the center of the stem component in the direction of intramedullary canal insertion. Thus, the “longitudinal axis” is also roughly defined as running parallel to a centerline running between the proximal and distal end of the radius bone.
“Transverse axis” or “assembly axis” is an axis that intersects the longitudinal axis. The transverse axis can be linear or non-linear. For example, if non-linear, the axis can be arcuate, provided the assembly axis intersects the longitudinal axis. Thus, angles >0° and <180° qualify as “transverse.” However, for practical purposes, the transverse axis can be from 45° to 135° with respect to the longitudinal axis in order to significantly benefit from the modular assembly benefits described herein. In many instances, an essentially perpendicular transverse axis with respect to the longitudinal axis will be present.
“Protuberance” can include any protuberance functional with the present disclosure, particularly with respect to certain locking mechanisms. For example, such protuberances can be convexities.
“Concavity” is intended to describe an open space defined by a mounting portion of a stem component, or an inner core. With respect to a locking mechanism, the concavity can be configured to inversely match and accept a protuberance, though this is not required.
“Intramedullary” shall mean within the marrow cavity of a bone.
“Native” is used to describe the condition of the bone or the head of a bone prior to damage or removal.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the disclosure, reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure.
In order to remedy the shortcomings of prosthetic radial head replacement, a radial head prosthesis is disclosed that enables the assembly without having to significantly remove or manipulate bone and tissue as part of an overhead assembly. By implementing a sliding mechanism for the assembly of the modular radial head prosthesis as described herein, improvement over the commercially available prosthetics can be achieved. Specifically, a sliding mechanism in conjunction with a locking mechanism enables the secure attachment and reasonable removal of a head component from an intact stem component, without the disadvantages associated with head component insertion along the longitudinal axis.
With the above descriptions and definitions in mind, a stem component 10 is shown in
Turning to
The stem component shown in
Turning specifically to
As can be seen more clearly in
As shown in this embodiment, the inner core open channel 26 does not traverse completely through the inner core body 22. Thus, the inner core groove 26 is just long enough such that when the mounting portion of the stem component (not shown) is tracked within the inner core open channel 26, the mounting portion and the inner core 20 will be coaxial.
In
Turning to
When assembling the head component onto the mounting portion 14, due to elastic deformation of the inner core protuberances 24a, 24b, all of the protuberances 16a, 16b, 24a, 24b can be slid past opposing protuberances under sufficient translational force. In this embodiment, the protuberances are shaped such that the force required to press the protuberances past their opposing protuberances is intentional and reasonable, but not excessive.
In
Specifically, with respect to
In
The use of such a tool is particularly helpful when a locking mechanism such as that described in
A procedure that can be followed for the insertion of the modular radial head prosthesis is as follows. If necessary, after resection of a substantially unreconstructable radial head bone, a proximal edge of the radius bone can be removed by transverse sawing or some other removal technique. After the damaged radial head has been removed, the medullary canal of the bone can then be broached with one or more of a series of broaches, the shapes of which approximate the various stem sizes available. Once an appropriate size stem component size has been selected, the anchoring portion can be inserted into the proximal radius bone such that the mounting portion protrudes from the proximal radius bone. The head component can then be selected based upon parameters such as proper ligament tensioning, circumference, and height. If desired, this assessment can be assisted with the use of plastic trials made available for this purpose. After an appropriately sized head component is selected, the forearm can be rotated so that the mounting portion is positioned to receive the head portion, i.e., an assembled outer shell/inner core combination or a single piece head component. If the head component comprises an outer shell and an inner core, the head component can either be assembled at the time of manufacture or by the surgeon. In any event, the outer shell groove and the inner core groove should be positioned such that the grooves line up for accepting the mounting portion. Once the stem component is in place and the proper head component is assembled and selected, the head component is then translated onto the stem component fully. If a locking mechanism is used such as that described in
With the above figures and surgical procedures in mind, a modular prosthesis system for replacement of the radial head portion of the radius bone is disclosed comprising a stem component and a head component. The stem component comprises an anchoring portion and a mounting portion, and the head component can have an open channel configured to connect to the mounting portion along an assembly axis that is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the stem component. The connection can be by a sliding motion. Though the system requires only that the assembly axis be transverse to the longitudinal axis of the stem component, for practical purposes, the transverse angle will generally be from about 45° to 135° with respect to the longitudinal axis. This is due to the fact that as you approach angles closer to parallel with the longitudinal axis, the head component becomes more difficult to put in place. In many incidences, the assembly axis will intersect the longitudinal axis at essentially a perpendicular angle.
The system can further comprise a locking mechanism to prevent the open channel of the head component from indeliberately sliding on the mounting portion once connected to the mounting portion. This is desirable because once the prosthesis has become part of the functioning elbow joint, any slippage could require surgery for repair. Thus, the only circumstance wherein sliding should be allowed should occur at the hand of the surgeon, with deliberate action. The locking mechanism can be configured such as that shown in
In one embodiment, the mounting portion can be configured for allowing the head component to slide along a single axis via the open channel. Such an embodiment is shown in
Though not required, the head component can be inserted and removed from the mounting portion with a specially designed tool. Thus, the system of the present disclosure can further comprise a tool for inserting and removing the head component while the stem component is in place within a radial canal. Such a tool can comprise a first arm for inserting the head component onto the mounting portion or removing the head component from the mounting portion; a second arm for stabilizing the radius bone; and a translational force mechanism for moving the first arm while the second arm stabilizes the radius bone. The terms “translation” and “stabilizing” are used loosely depending on whether the tool is being used for insertion or removal of the head component, the arm acting to provide the translational force and the arm acting to provide stabilization can be changed. Thus, the terms are relative as to the action, rather than to the specific structure. For example, when insertion of the head component is being carried out, the first arm carrying out the translational insertion does so by a pushing force, and the second arm stabilizes the radius bone by a pulling force. Conversely, when removal of the head component is being carried out, the first arm removes the head component by a pulling force (i.e., the tool is flipped over, and the second arm stabilizes the radius bone by a pushing force).
As part of the system, a method for fitting a damaged radius bone with a modular radial head prosthesis is disclosed comprising the steps of securing a stem component partially within a proximal intramedullary canal of the damaged radius bone such that a mounting portion of stem component is exposed above the damaged radius bone; selecting a head component that will provide a desired result; and sliding the head component onto the mounting portion in a direction along an assembly axis that is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the stem component. Typically, a preliminary step of removing a radial head of the damaged radius bone is carried out prior to fitting the radius bone with the prosthesis of the present disclosure, though there can be circumstances where this preliminary step is not necessary. Additionally, before securing the stem component within the intramedullary canal, it may be desirable to carry out the preliminary step of sizing the stem component to securely fit within the proximal canal. This can be done using a set of broaches designed for this purpose. The stem component can be secured within the intramedullary canal by one of a number of techniques including the use of cement, firm pressure into the canal, or impacting the stem component into the canal, for example.
Once the stem component is in place, the next step of selecting an appropriate head component is carried out. Considerations can include assessing a desired tensioning of one or more ligaments attached to the radius bone and/or assessing the height and shape of the head component to be used. Aid in this area can be provided by the use of trials designed for this purpose. Such trials can be plastic structures configured to approximate the size and shape of the head component to be ultimately placed on the mounting portion. It is appreciated that the trials can be made of other suitable materials.
Referring to
In other embodiments, the inner core 20 and the outer shell body 32 are comprised of the same material (
With reference to
In the various embodiments, the radial head component 30 can have a unitary construction (i.e., one-piece), thus omitting the inner core 20 and outer shell body 32. In this arrangement, the radial head component 30 can be constructed of metal such as cobalt chrome, titanium or any other suitable biocompatible material for implementation into the human body. By way of example, the radial head component 30 can be secured to either the stem mounting portion 14 or the collar mounting portion 66 of the collar component 62 with a suitable mechanical fastener 60.
With reference to
It can be appreciated that the various components of the modular prosthesis system can use various connection portions with myriad configurations. By way of example, the mounting portion on the various components is configured in a T-shaped protrusion generally indicated by reference numeral 82. A complementary open channel 84 is similarly configured in a T-shape to accept the T-shaped protrusion 82. With reference to
It can be appreciated that the various components of the modular prosthesis can be scaled to fit the patients native bone structure. A collar length 94 (
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The kit 108 provides the plurality of head components 30, angled collar components 68, collar components 62, and stem components 10 that can be assembled and adjusted during a medical procedure to provide a fit that can be in-situ determined and adjusted. It can be appreciated that a medical professional can determine a proper length and angle and select among the components of the kit 108 to achieve the proper length and angle. Nevertheless, the medical professional can select and substitute components in-situ to adjust to achieve the proper length and angle.
Turning now to
With particular attention now given to
The connection portions 142 can generally define longitudinal channels 154 formed therethrough. As will be described herein, the channels 154 can allow the connection portions 142 to compress radially inwardly during an assembly step. The connection portions 142 are monolithic and formed integral with the remaining structure of the articulating component 122. In other examples, the connection portions 142 can be modular and be formed of distinct material from the remainder of the articulation component 122. While a pair of connection portions 142 are shown and described with respect to the disclosed embodiments, it is appreciated that additional or fewer connection portions 142 may be provided on the articulating component 122. In the particular example shown, a pair of connection portions 142 formed generally toward a perimeter of the distal surface 140 of the central extension portion 136 can provide anti-rotation characteristics in an assembled position as will become appreciated from the following discussion. The connection portions 142 can additionally or alternatively be provided elsewhere on the distal surface 140.
With reference now to
A pair of connection portions 180 are formed in the cylindrical body 160. In general, the connection portions 180 include female receiving portions or closed bores 182 formed into the proximal surface 172. Each of the female receiving portions 182 generally include an angled beveled entrance surface 184 and a reduced diameter portion 186. As can be appreciated, the connection portions 180 (
The head component 124a can further include another connection portion in the form of a T-shaped channel 190 having an entrance generally through a sidewall 192 of the cylindrical body 160. As best illustrated in
With specific reference now to
The stem component 126 will now be briefly described. The stem component 126 can generally include a stem connection portion in the form of a T-shaped protrusion 210 having a threaded blind bore 212. Again, while one stem component 126 is described and shown in the drawings, it is appreciated that a plurality of stems may be provided (see kit 108,
An exemplary method of assembling the modular radial head prosthesis system 120 will now be described according to one example. At the outset, once a head component 124a, 124b or 124c has been selected that accommodates the needs of a particular patient, the articulating component 122 can be selected having a particular material depending on the needs of the particular patient, for example, for articulation with a natural bone or a capitellar implant. The articulation component 122 can be attached to the proximal end 170 of the head component (such as 124a). A surgeon can generally align the male insertion portions 144 on the central extension portion 136 of the articulating component 122 for receipt into the complementary female receiving portions 182 provided on the proximal surface 172 of the head component 124a.
With particular reference now to
As shown in
With reference now to
The articulating component 222 can include a body portion 230 that is fashioned to approximate the dimensions of a damaged or removed radial head. Thus, the outer shape is roughly cylindrical, having a slightly concave articulating portion 232 (
Additional description of the head component 224 will now be described in greater detail. The head component 224 comprises a generally cylindrical body 260 that has a generally bulbous proximal portion 262 and a cylindrical distal portion 266. A countersink 268 is formed on a proximal end 270 of the bulbous proximal portion 262. The countersink 268 can generally include a female tapered wall that has a geometry complementary with the tapered surface of the extension portion 236 of the articulating component 222. The countersink 268 can generally terminate at a proximal surface 272 for engagement with the distal surface 248.
A connection portion 280 (
The head component 224 can further include another connection portion in the form of a T-shaped channel 290 having an entrance generally through a sidewall 292 of the cylindrical body 260. As illustrated in
With particular reference now to
An exemplary method of assembling the modular radial head prosthesis system 220 will now be described according to one example. At the outset, a surgeon can select a given articulating component 222, a head component 224 and a stem component 226 that provide the desired dimensions, materials, etc. according to a patient's particular needs. Next, the cylindrical member 244 of the connection portion 242 on the articulating component 222 is advanced axially into the connection portion 280 of the head component 224. Next, the T-shaped protrusion 308 on the stem component 226 can be slidably advanced into the T-shaped channel 290 of the head component 224. During the advancement of the T-shaped protrusion 308 on the stem component 226, the T-shaped protrusion 308 will slidably interconnect with the T-shaped channel 290 of the head component 224 as well as the T-shaped slot 248 on the articulating component 222, thereby coupling the articulating component 222, head component 224 and stem component 226 together. In other words, the T-shaped channel 290 and the T-shaped slot 248 are co-aligned channels for receipt of the T-shaped protrusion 308 to simultaneously couple the head 224, the stem 226, and the articulation portion 222. The fastener 228 can then be advanced into the counterbore 296 formed in the sidewall 292, such that its shank extends through the collar 298 of the cylindrical body 260 and threadably mates with the threaded blind bore 312 on the stem component 226.
Turning now to
In one example, the head component 324 can further include an integrally formed stem portion 330 extending therefrom. In other examples, a modular stem can be provided that mates with the head component 324. According to the present disclosure, the modular radial head prosthesis system 320 can provide a series of head components 324 having different dimensions, such as height dimensions described above with respect to
The modularity of the modular radial head prosthesis system 320 can allow a surgeon to have a common articulating component 322 that can be intraoperatively coupled with various head components 320 to create an assembled modular radial head prosthesis that provides the desired geometry and profile for any particular patient. It is also appreciated that while a single articulating component and head component are described and shown with respect to the drawings, additional articulating components 322 may also be provided that can offer various material characteristics and/or geometric configurations as described herein.
The articulating component 322 will now be described in greater detail. The articulating component 322 can include a body portion 330 that is constructed to approximate the dimensions of a damaged or removed radial head. Thus, the outer shape is roughly cylindrical, having a slightly concaved top or articulating portion 332 for natural articulation with the capitellum (see reference 39,
The articulating component 322 can include the first connection portion 326 that can be in the form of an annular undercut 334. The undercut 334 can have an upper ridge 336 a lower ridge 338 and a lip 339. An extension portion 340 can be formed on one side of the articulating component 322. The extension portion 340 can generally include a cylindrical member that has an outer geometry that substantially matches an outer profile of a cavity 344 defined on the head component 324, but has a reduced diameter. The extension portion 340 can be located offset from a centerpoint of the articulating component 322 to inhibit rotation of the articulating component 322 relative to the head component 324 in an assembled position. In another configuration, the articulating component 322 can be keyed to the head component 324.
The head component 324 can generally comprise a cylindrical body 350 that has a central recess 352. The second connection portion 328 can collectively include an annular groove 354 and an upper ridge 356 formed around the head component 324. The head component 324 can be formed of a metal or metal alloy, such as, but not limited to, titanium, stainless steel and cobalt chrome. It is appreciated that while the first connection portion 326 has been shown and described as part of the articulation component 322 and the second connection portion 328 has been shown and described as part of the head component, the location of these features may be reversed. Furthermore, it is contemplated that other geometries may be alternatively be provided that attain a compression fit between the articulating component 322 and the head component 324.
An exemplary method of assembling the modular radial head prosthesis system 320 will now be described according to one example. At the outset, once a head component 324 has been selected that accommodates the particular needs of a given patient the articulating component 322 can also be selected. As further discussed herein, selection of the articulating component 322 and the head component 324 can be based, at least in part, on first determining a distance between a proximal radius and a humerus of the patient. The articulating component 322 can then be shrunk in size. In one example, the articulating component 322 can be exposed to a reduction in temperature, such as by placing it in a freezer or subjecting it to liquid nitrogen. As can be appreciated, by cooling the components, it contracts or shrinks and the reduction in size can allow the outer diameter of the lip 339 to be less than an inner diameter of the ridge 356 on the head component 324. In this regard, the lip 339 of the articulating component can be advanced into the recess 352 of the head component 324. Concurrently, a user can align the extension portion 340 of the articulating component 322 with receipt into the cavity 344 of the head component 324. The upper ridge 336 of the first connection portion 326 can rest on top of the ridge 356 of the second connection portion 328. The articulating component 322 is then allowed to return to ambient temperature (
The description of the disclosure is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the disclosure are intended to be within the scope of the disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been shown in the drawings and fully described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiment(s) of the disclosure, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made, without departing from the principles and concepts of the disclosure as set forth in the claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/794,196, filed Jun. 4, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/578,052, filed Oct. 13, 2009 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,425,615 on Apr. 23, 2013), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/999,297, filed Nov. 29, 2004 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,163 on Feb. 14, 2012), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/464,043, filed on Jun. 18, 2003 (now abandoned), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/828,745, filed Apr. 9, 2001 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,225 on Dec. 2, 2003), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/195,444, filed Apr. 10, 2000. The disclosures of the above applications and patents are hereby incorporated by reference as fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2682265 | Collison | Jun 1954 | A |
2719522 | Hudack | Oct 1955 | A |
2765787 | Pellet | Oct 1956 | A |
2781758 | Chevalier | Feb 1957 | A |
2785673 | Anderson | Mar 1957 | A |
3064645 | Ficat et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3067740 | Haboush | Dec 1962 | A |
3102536 | Rose et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3658056 | Huggler et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3670724 | Bosacco | Jun 1972 | A |
3694820 | Scales et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3782373 | Smythe | Jan 1974 | A |
3806957 | Shersher | Apr 1974 | A |
3814089 | Deyerle | Jun 1974 | A |
3818512 | Shersher | Jun 1974 | A |
3852830 | Marmor | Dec 1974 | A |
3859669 | Shersher | Jan 1975 | A |
3863273 | Averill | Feb 1975 | A |
3874003 | Moser et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3906550 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3916451 | Buechel et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3918441 | Getscher | Nov 1975 | A |
3974527 | Shersher | Aug 1976 | A |
3979778 | Stroot | Sep 1976 | A |
3987499 | Scharbach et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4004300 | English | Jan 1977 | A |
4030143 | Elloy et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4040131 | Gristina | Aug 1977 | A |
4042980 | Swanson et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4051559 | Pifferi | Oct 1977 | A |
4052917 | Gee | Oct 1977 | A |
4079469 | Wadsworth | Mar 1978 | A |
4115875 | Rambert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4129902 | Harmon | Dec 1978 | A |
4131956 | Treace | Jan 1979 | A |
4219893 | Noiles | Sep 1980 | A |
4242758 | Amis et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4245360 | Brinckmann et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4257129 | Volz | Mar 1981 | A |
4261062 | Amstutz et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4280231 | Swanson | Jul 1981 | A |
4301552 | London | Nov 1981 | A |
4301553 | Noiles | Nov 1981 | A |
4378607 | Wadsworth | Apr 1983 | A |
4383337 | Volz et al. | May 1983 | A |
4404691 | Buning et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4406023 | Harris | Sep 1983 | A |
4407022 | Heimke et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4430761 | Niederer et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4459708 | Buttazzoni | Jul 1984 | A |
4488319 | von Recum | Dec 1984 | A |
4521924 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532660 | Field | Aug 1985 | A |
4550450 | Kinnett | Nov 1985 | A |
4578081 | Harder et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4624674 | Pappas et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4645506 | Link | Feb 1987 | A |
4655778 | Koeneman | Apr 1987 | A |
4658808 | Link | Apr 1987 | A |
4676797 | Anapliotis et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686978 | Wadsworth | Aug 1987 | A |
4687486 | Brinckmann et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693723 | Gabard | Sep 1987 | A |
4693724 | Rhenter et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698063 | Link et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4728333 | Masse et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4764171 | Harder et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4769040 | Wevers | Sep 1988 | A |
4770852 | Takahara et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4790854 | Harder et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4822366 | Bolesky | Apr 1989 | A |
4822370 | Schelhas | Apr 1989 | A |
4827919 | Barbarito et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834758 | Lane et al. | May 1989 | A |
4840632 | Kampner | Jun 1989 | A |
4842606 | Kranz et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4865605 | Dines et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865609 | Roche | Sep 1989 | A |
4871369 | Muller | Oct 1989 | A |
4878917 | Kranz et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4883489 | Grundei et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4895572 | Chernoff | Jan 1990 | A |
4904266 | Barber | Feb 1990 | A |
4908032 | Keller | Mar 1990 | A |
4908034 | Weightman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919669 | Lannelongue | Apr 1990 | A |
4919670 | Dale et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919678 | Kranz | Apr 1990 | A |
4921500 | Averill et al. | May 1990 | A |
4923472 | Ugolini | May 1990 | A |
4932974 | Pappas et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938772 | Frey et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4938773 | Strand | Jul 1990 | A |
4944757 | Martinez et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950298 | Gustilo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4963152 | Hofmann et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4963155 | Lazzeri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4978357 | Goymann et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4979957 | Hodorek | Dec 1990 | A |
4985037 | Petersen | Jan 1991 | A |
4986833 | Worland | Jan 1991 | A |
4995883 | Demane et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997444 | Farling | Mar 1991 | A |
5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
5002580 | Noble et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002581 | Paxson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007933 | Sidebotham et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015257 | Crowninshield et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019103 | Van Zile et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019108 | Bertin et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030234 | Pappas et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5030237 | Sorbie et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032130 | Schelhas et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5035717 | Brooks | Jul 1991 | A |
5061271 | Van Zile | Oct 1991 | A |
5066304 | Crowninshield et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071435 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5074879 | Pappas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080676 | May | Jan 1992 | A |
5080685 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108437 | Kenna | Apr 1992 | A |
5108451 | Forte | Apr 1992 | A |
5108452 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116379 | McLardy-Smith | May 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139529 | Seita et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5147386 | Carignan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147406 | Houston et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152796 | Slamin | Oct 1992 | A |
5156627 | Amstutz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163961 | Harwin | Nov 1992 | A |
5169401 | Lester et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181925 | Houston et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181928 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192320 | Anazawa et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194066 | Van Zile | Mar 1993 | A |
5201768 | Caspari et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201769 | Schutzer | Apr 1993 | A |
5201881 | Evans | Apr 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5207682 | Cripe | May 1993 | A |
5207711 | Caspari et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211666 | Fetto | May 1993 | A |
5219362 | Tuke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5246459 | Elias | Sep 1993 | A |
5261915 | Durlacher et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271737 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282865 | Dong | Feb 1994 | A |
5286260 | Bolesky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290313 | Heldreth | Mar 1994 | A |
5314479 | Rockwood, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314494 | Huiskes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316550 | Forte | May 1994 | A |
5326363 | Aikins | Jul 1994 | A |
5326368 | Collazo | Jul 1994 | A |
5330534 | Herrington et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336266 | Caspari et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336268 | Rispeter | Aug 1994 | A |
5342363 | Richelsoph | Aug 1994 | A |
5344461 | Phlipot | Sep 1994 | A |
5358526 | Tornier | Oct 1994 | A |
5358527 | Forte | Oct 1994 | A |
5358529 | Davidson | Oct 1994 | A |
5358534 | Dudasik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370699 | Hood et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370701 | Finn | Dec 1994 | A |
5370706 | Bolesky et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395401 | Bahler | Mar 1995 | A |
5397360 | Cohen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405394 | Davidson | Apr 1995 | A |
5405395 | Coates | Apr 1995 | A |
5405403 | Mikhail | Apr 1995 | A |
5413605 | Ashby et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425777 | Sarkisian et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425779 | Schlosser et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431658 | Moskovich | Jul 1995 | A |
5443512 | Parr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458637 | Hayes | Oct 1995 | A |
5458644 | Grundei | Oct 1995 | A |
5458651 | Lawes | Oct 1995 | A |
5480443 | Elias | Jan 1996 | A |
5480453 | Burke | Jan 1996 | A |
5489309 | Lackey et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5489310 | Mikhail | Feb 1996 | A |
5507817 | Craig et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507818 | McLaughlin | Apr 1996 | A |
5507822 | Bouchon et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507827 | Grundei et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507830 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507832 | Michielli et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507833 | Bohn | Apr 1996 | A |
5509935 | Fosco et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5549682 | Roy | Aug 1996 | A |
5549686 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549687 | Coates et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549702 | Ries et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549703 | Daigle et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549705 | Michielli et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549706 | McCarthy | Aug 1996 | A |
5554192 | Crowninshield | Sep 1996 | A |
5556433 | Gabriel et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571193 | Kampner | Nov 1996 | A |
5580352 | Sekel | Dec 1996 | A |
5591233 | Kelman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593449 | Roberson, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609641 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609645 | Vinciguerra | Mar 1997 | A |
5645607 | Hickey | Jul 1997 | A |
5653764 | Murphy | Aug 1997 | A |
5653765 | McTighe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658340 | Muller et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658344 | Hurlburt | Aug 1997 | A |
5658352 | Draenert | Aug 1997 | A |
5683469 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683472 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697977 | Pisharodi | Dec 1997 | A |
5702457 | Walch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702460 | Carls et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702463 | Pothier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702464 | Lackey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702480 | Kropf et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702484 | Goymann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702485 | Burke et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702486 | Craig et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713901 | Tock | Feb 1998 | A |
5725587 | Garber | Mar 1998 | A |
5725592 | White et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725594 | McTighe et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725595 | Gustilo | Mar 1998 | A |
5725596 | Burke | Mar 1998 | A |
5728163 | Maksene | Mar 1998 | A |
5746771 | Clement, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755800 | O'Neil et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755803 | Haines et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755805 | Whiteside | May 1998 | A |
5755807 | Anstaett et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755811 | Tanamal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766255 | Slamin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766261 | Neal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769093 | Bays | Jun 1998 | A |
5776194 | Mikol et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776200 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776201 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776204 | Noble et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782920 | Colleran | Jul 1998 | A |
5782921 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782922 | Vandewalle | Jul 1998 | A |
5800552 | Forte | Sep 1998 | A |
5800558 | LaHaise, Sr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800560 | Draenert | Sep 1998 | A |
5824096 | Pappas et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824097 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855619 | Caplan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858020 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860969 | White et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863297 | Walter et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871541 | Gerber | Feb 1999 | A |
5871547 | Abouaf et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871548 | Sanders et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876459 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879391 | Slamin | Mar 1999 | A |
5879393 | Whiteside et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879394 | Ashby et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879395 | Tornier et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888203 | Goldberg | Mar 1999 | A |
5888208 | Ro | Mar 1999 | A |
5888245 | Meulink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902340 | White et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906210 | Herbert | May 1999 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
5928285 | Bigliani et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928286 | Ashby et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928289 | Deckner | Jul 1999 | A |
5931871 | Baur et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935172 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944756 | Fischetti et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944758 | Mansat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
5961555 | Huebner | Oct 1999 | A |
5972033 | Drouin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976178 | Goldsteen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981828 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997577 | Herrington et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004352 | Buni | Dec 1999 | A |
6007581 | Noble et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010535 | Shah | Jan 2000 | A |
6013104 | Kampner | Jan 2000 | A |
6015431 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015437 | Stossel | Jan 2000 | A |
6045581 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2000 | A |
6045582 | Prybyla | Apr 2000 | A |
6162253 | Conzemius et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168630 | Keller | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214014 | McGann | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214053 | Ling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217616 | Ogilvie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270529 | Terrill-Grisoni | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277123 | Maroney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306171 | Conzemius | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319286 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352560 | Poeschmann et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361563 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6361566 | Al-Hafez | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379387 | Tornier | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383223 | Baehler et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432110 | Richelsoph | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440142 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494913 | Huebner | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527775 | Warburton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6589282 | Pearl | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603638 | Yotsuya | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613092 | Kana et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656225 | Martin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6709459 | Cooney, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6942699 | Stone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7153310 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7179259 | Gibbs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7297163 | Huebner | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7404795 | Ralph et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7462182 | Lim | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7507255 | Ralph et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534266 | Kluger | May 2009 | B2 |
7559941 | Zannis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575580 | Lim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637952 | Landry et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666189 | Gerber et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722675 | Ralph et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7749252 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749269 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758584 | Bankoski et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763031 | Tulkis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8110005 | Berelsman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114163 | Berelsman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8366781 | Berelsman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425615 | Berelsman et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8535382 | Kehres et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8920509 | Katrana | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9333084 | Berelsman et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20010037154 | Martin | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053935 | Hartdegen | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030149485 | Tornier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030212457 | Martin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040254581 | Leclair | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050075735 | Berelsman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050171613 | Sartorius et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216090 | O'Driscoll et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246027 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060195196 | Pendleton et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090118837 | Winslow et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125115 | Popoola et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100030339 | Berelsman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100262252 | Berelsman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312349 | Berelsman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120109323 | Berelsman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130333198 | Kehres et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3205577 | Oct 1982 | DE |
3605630 | Sep 1987 | DE |
4230438 | Mar 1993 | DE |
009300791 | Jul 1993 | DE |
4320086 | Dec 1994 | DE |
69304936 | Feb 1997 | DE |
19722389 | Dec 1998 | DE |
19548154 | Sep 2002 | DE |
0000549 | Feb 1979 | EP |
0163121 | Dec 1985 | EP |
0278807 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0325566 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0390883 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0474320 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0531263 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0538895 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0549480 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0552950 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0617933 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0645126 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0683649 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0689808 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0809986 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1051954 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2519248 | Jul 1983 | FR |
2619502 | Feb 1989 | FR |
2632516 | Dec 1989 | FR |
2682031 | Apr 1993 | FR |
2689756 | Oct 1993 | FR |
2720626 | Dec 1995 | FR |
2721820 | Jan 1996 | FR |
2253147 | Sep 1992 | GB |
2334090 | Aug 1999 | GB |
2334890 | Sep 1999 | GB |
8302555 | Aug 1983 | WO |
9002533 | Mar 1990 | WO |
9118559 | Dec 1991 | WO |
9417757 | Aug 1994 | WO |
9600538 | Jan 1996 | WO |
9625123 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9716137 | May 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,297, mailed Jun. 9, 2011. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,297, mailed Dec. 3, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,297, mailed Mar. 11, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,297, mailed Dec. 22, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/041,864, mailed Jun. 10, 2011. |
“rHead.TM. Lateral Surgical Technique Insert,” brochure. Jul. 2007. SBI Small Bone Innovations. |
“The Morrey Treatment Algorithm for Elbow Management,” brochure. Aug. 2008. SBI Small Bone Innovations, Inc. (2 sheets). |
“Uni-Elbow PGT.TM., Surgical Technique,” brochure. 2006. SBI Small Bone Innovations, Inc. (6 sheets). |
“Uni-Elbow.TM. Radio Capitellum Implant for Uni-Compartmental Arthroplasty,” brochure. 2009. SBI Small Bone Innovations, Inc. (2 sheets). |
Biomet Merck, “Liverpool Radial Head Replacement” brochure, 2001 (6 pages). |
Biomet, Orthopedics, Inc., “Liverpool.TM. Radial Head Replacement, Operative Technique” brochure, 2002 (6 pages). |
Finkemeier, Chrristopher, M.D., and Olmstead, Stephen, M.D., Drawing dated Mar. 5, 1999 and related Expired Confidential Disclosure Agreement dated Feb. 23, 1999. |
Morrey, B.F., M.D., “Radial Head Fracture,” The Elbow and its Disorders, pp. 355-381, Chapter 20, The Mayo Foundation (1985). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,568, mailed Apr. 6, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/578,052, mailed Jul. 24, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/324,328, mailed Dec. 3, 2012. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jan. 11, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 21, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Response filed Jan. 17, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Response filed Apr. 19, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 19, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Response filed Jun. 4, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 7, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Response filed Sep. 17, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 19, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,196, Restriction Requirement mailed May 7, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/041,864, Appeal Decision mailed Jul. 23, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,991, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,991, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,991, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 6, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,991, Response filed Jul. 9, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,991, Response filed Dec. 16, 2015 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,658, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,658, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,658, Response filed Feb. 3, 2016 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,658, Response filed Jun. 9, 2016 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150073561 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60195444 | Apr 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12794196 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 14541548 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10999297 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 12578052 | US | |
Parent | 09828745 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 10464043 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12578052 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 12794196 | US | |
Parent | 10464043 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10999297 | US |