The present disclosure relates to methods and devices for retracting tissue in a surgical procedure to allow access to the surgical site. The purpose of this Retractor System is to provide soft tissue retraction, allowing surgical access to the spine. More specifically, this invention is intended for use during Oblique (Anterior to Psoas) Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at L5-S1 between the bifurcation. However, it also could be used in any surgical approach requiring soft tissue retraction.
Retractor systems may be used in a variety of different surgical procedures to provide an opening through which the doctor may access the surgical site. In spinal surgeries, for example, a retractor system may be used to provide the surgeon with access to the patient's spine. The opening created by the retractor system may, for example, enable the doctor to insert surgical instruments into the body or enable visualization of the surgical site using X-ray. One typical retractor system may include a plurality of blades coupled to a retractor frame. In use, the blades may be inserted into an incision and then retracted to displace tissue surrounding the incision exposing the surgical site. To minimize trauma to the tissue, this tissue displacement should be refined and controlled. However, current retractor systems do not provide desired control of the distraction. More particularly, the devices currently in use are mechanically coupled so the surgeon has limited ability to feel the resistance at the blades or to rotate the blades affixed to the retractor arm independently. This limited control takes away the skilled surgeon's ability to finely adjust the movement of the retractor blades.
The disadvantage of these systems is that the frame is positioned first and then the retractor blades are placed. The position of the retractor blades is therefore limited by the position of the frame.
In the case of 2, 3, and 4 blade ring retractors, the retraction on soft tissue is done through rigid mechanisms that do not provide tactile feel. This increases the risk of damage to vessels and other soft tissue.
Thus, there is a need for improved methods and devices that can be used for retracting tissue to provide access to the surgical site.
A system and method of positioning a spinal implant into an intervertebral space comprises the steps of: cutting an incision through the skin toward an intervertebral space between a L5 and S1 vertebra; inserting an uncoupled first, second and third retractor blade into the incision to pre-position the retractor blades prior to retraction; coupling the pre-positioned first retractor blade to a connector arm to connect the first retractor blade to a table arm; attaching a blade to blade connector and mini flex arm to couple the second blade to either the first blade or third blade; and wherein the three uncoupled blades, once pre-positioned and then coupled, the blades are retracted to open the incision and expose the vertebral bodies.
One or more of the blades have threaded Steinmann pins and the method includes securing one of the blades to the vertebra. The uncoupled blades have a handle quick connect attached to pre-position the blade. The method further comprises detaching the handle quick connect once the blade is pre-positioned.
Once retraction is complete, the step of discectomy and end plate preparation is completed, and the method further has the step of implanting an implant. The implant is inserted using an inserter on an OLIF approach of about 25 degrees off a coronal plane. The implant is inserted without the use of an orthogonal maneuver. The implant when inserted using an approach 25 degrees off the coronal plane, the lordosis of the implant will be correctly aligned with the lordosis of the spine. The implant is inserted using a straight or articulating inserter. The articulating inserter allows the surgeon to adjust the angle of the inserter handle relative to the implant to adjust the trajectory of the implant prior to inserting into the disc space or after. The system is configured to build a rigid frame outside of the body after the blades have been properly positioned by hand and pinned to a vertebral body.
The surgeon has the flexibility to place the blades wherever they want without being limited by the rigid frame ensuring that the blades are placed perfectly every time based on unique anatomic structures while still providing a rigid frame. Placing the retractor blades by hand provides the surgeon with tactile feedback to help reduce the risk of vascular injury. The blade to blade fixation eliminates the need to hold one of the blades in place during the procedure. If two blade to blade connections are used, this eliminates the need for a second table arm and removes clutter from the sterile field.
For convenience, certain terms employed in the entire application (including the specification, examples, and appended claims) are collected here. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular methodology, protocols, cell lines or type of stem cell, constructs, additives, and reagents described herein. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention which will be limited only by the appended claims.
OLIF—or oblique lateral interbody fusion, is a less invasive approach to spinal fusion surgery in which the neurosurgeon accesses and repairs the lower (lumbar) spine from the front and side of the body (passing in a trajectory about halfway between the middle of the stomach and the side of the body). During an OLIF procedure, the surgeon uses a corridor between the psoas muscle and the peritoneum to access the spine. The psoas muscles connect the lower back to the thighs and enable movement and flexibility of the back, pelvis, legs, and hips. The peritoneum is the membrane that lines the abdominal cavity.
Psoas—The psoas is a deep-seated core muscle connecting the lumbar vertebrae to the femur. The psoas major is the biggest and strongest player in a group of muscles called the hip flexors: together they contract to pull the thigh and the torso toward each other.
The invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
There are 3 retractor blades 10, 20, 30 as part of the system, designated #1 Blade 10, #2 Blade 20, and #3 Blade 30. Each Blade will come in a range of lengths (approximately 10-20 cm). Each blade 10, 20, 30 can have optional retraction ends.
#1 Blade 10 is designed to be placed medially of the left common iliac vein, for a left sided up approach, or medially of the right common iliac vein, for a right sided up approach.
#2 Blade 20 is designed to be placed caudally of the bifurcation.
#3 Blade 30 is designed to be placed medially for the right common iliac vein, for a left sided up approach, or medially of the left common iliac vein for a right sided up approach. Optionally, #3 Blade 30 can include a slot for a light source, similar to slot 28 of blade 20.
A light source or shim may be placed down the T shaped channel or slot 28 of blade 20 as shown in
Referring to
With reference to
Using a handle quick connect 60 attached to the blades, the surgeon will place #1 Blade 10 into the exposure and position as desired. A blade to arm connector 40 will then be used to connect #1 Blade 10 to a table arm. The handle from the handle quick connect 60 may be removed. The same will be done for #3 Blade 30. #2 Blade 20 will be inserted into the exposure and positioned as desired. Using a mini flex arm 70 and blade to blade connectors 50, #2 Blade 20 will be connected to either #1 Blade 10 or #3 Blade 30. The handle may be removed. A blade to blade connector 50 and mini flex arm 70 may be substituted for the blade to arm connector 40 and table arm for either #1 Blade 10 or #3 Blade 30.
Once retraction is complete, discectomy and endplate preparation will be completed. Next, an implant preferably specifically designed for the OLIF approach (approximately 25° off the coronal plane) will be implanted, as shown in
The implant may be inserted using a straight or articulating inserter 200 as shown in
While the retractor system 100 with inserter 200 is design specifically for an OLIF approach at L5-S1 between the bifurcation, it can also be utilized for an OLIF approach at levels higher up in the lumbar spine. Furthermore, the retractor blades could be utilized for any surgical approach, spine or otherwise, that requires soft tissue retraction.
A particularly unique feature of this system 100 is the ability to build the rigid frame outside of the body after the blades have been properly positioned by hand and pinned to a vertebral body.
Additionally, the overall system 100 eliminates the orthogonal maneuver during implant insertion and gives the ability to dial in the trajectory of the implant relative to the inserter handle during an OLIF approach.
The advantage of this system is that the surgeon has the flexibility to place the blades wherever they want without being limited by the rigid frame. This ensures that the blades are placed perfectly every time based on unique anatomic structures while still providing a rigid frame.
Placing the retractor blades 10, 20, 30 by hand provides the surgeon with tactile feedback to help reduce the risk of vascular injury.
Blade to blade fixation eliminates the need for someone (typically a physician assistant) to hold one of the blades in place during the procedure. If two blade to blade connections are used, this eliminates the need for a second table arm and removes clutter from the sterile field.
The elimination of the orthogonal maneuver during implant insertion simplifies the procedure.
The ability to dial in the trajectory of the implant relative to the inserter handle during an OLIF approach allows the surgeon to correct the axial rotation of the implant relative to the disc space. This may be necessary due patient anatomy preventing an ideal approach angle.
Variations in the present invention are possible in light of the description of it provided herein. While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the subject invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the subject invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that changes can be made in the particular embodiments described which will be within the full intended scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/939,143, filed Nov. 22, 2019.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5303694 | Mikhail | Apr 1994 | A |
5902233 | Farley | May 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5984865 | Farley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
7556600 | Landry et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7785253 | Arambula | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7850608 | Hamada | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7931589 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946982 | Hamada | May 2011 | B2 |
7981029 | Branch et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8114016 | Lo | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8303499 | Hamada | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353826 | Weiman | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8636657 | Hamada | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8876904 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8968363 | Weiman et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9095301 | Hamada | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9451940 | Spann | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9486199 | Pimenta et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9622732 | Martinelli et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9848862 | Bass et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10085854 | Spann | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10130348 | Cryder et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10238375 | O'Connell | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10278786 | Friedrich | May 2019 | B2 |
10687830 | Garcia-Bengochea et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10959860 | Spann | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20010037123 | Hancock | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041828 | Deckman | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020099269 | Martin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050159651 | Raymond et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080140085 | Gately | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20110130793 | Woolley | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120010472 | Spann | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120271118 | White | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130023735 | Brown et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130204262 | Menendez | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130345520 | Hamada | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140257039 | Feldman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140350347 | Karpowicz | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150018628 | Friedrich | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150305731 | Friedrich et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160081818 | Waugh | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160354073 | Nel et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170014117 | Capote | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170296160 | O'Brien | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170333023 | Adams | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180042595 | Tsubouchi | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190029497 | Mirza et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190105179 | Spann | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20200015799 | Tsubouchi | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202654170 | Jan 2013 | CN |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 13, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/14677. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/155,848. |
Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/155,903. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210315563 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62939143 | Nov 2019 | US |