The present disclosure relates generally to a safety razors used for personal grooming. More particularly, the disclosure relates to adjustment mechanisms for selecting the aggressiveness of the shave provided by the safety razor.
A safety razor is a shaving implement with a protective device positioned between the edge of the blade and the skin. The initial purpose of these protective devices was to reduce the level of skill needed for injury-free shaving, thereby reducing the reliance on professional barbers for providing that service and raising grooming standards.
The term safety razor was first used in U.S. Pat. No. 228,904 issued to Frederic and Otto Kampfe in 1880, for a razor in the basic contemporary configuration with a handle attached at right angles to a head in which a removable blade is placed.
Not much has changed in the innovation of the design of safety razors since King C. Gillette's U.S. Pat. No. 775,134 was issued in 1904. Gillette's innovation was a thin, cheap, double-edged blade that could be disposed of when dull. Gillette's blade holder clamped the blade between a backing and a guard plate that was then attached to a handle. The patented design also allowed for adjusting the gap between the blade and the guard plate to allow for light or heavy growth beards or to suit the skill or custom of the shaver.
The most popular modern shaving implement uses cartridge based razors that include a number of single-edged razors in a disposable cartridges. The consumer cost of these disposable cartridges is quite high and has been an impetus for the return to traditional wet shaving using double-edged safety razors. Refilling a traditional safety razor can cost under 10 cents whereas modern cartridges can cost well over $2 to replace. Today's modern razor cartridges can also irritate the skin more than needed due to the multiple blades.
The term “aggressiveness” is used with respect to traditional, non-cartridge based razors to refer to the subjective feeling and performance of the safety razor. Generally, more aggressive safety razors expose more of the razor blade to the skin and are suitable for a heavier beard as they will require less strokes. These more aggressive safety razors are also prone to more nicks, cuts and irritation, and require a more skilled hand. Less aggressive safety razors can be suitable for shorter stubble and beginners to safety razor shaving. Because a man's stubble can vary in length depending on the time from his last shave, it is desirable to have a safety razor that can provide different levels of aggressiveness.
The aggressiveness of a safety razor can be defined by a number of different factors, including, but not limited to, the exposure of the blade and the blade gap. The exposure of the blade is defined as the protrusion of the blade edge beyond a line tangent to the cap and the guard, and the blade gap is defined as the space between the blade edge and the guard. Other factors that can influence aggressiveness can include the weight of the razor head, overall razor weight balance between the handle and razor head, and the handle length.
Safety razor designs have often tried to provide some level of to adjust aggressiveness of the razor. Often, as in King C. Gillette's above patent, this is provided by some means to adjust the blade gap between the blade and the guard plate. Other examples of this type of adjustments include U.S. Pat. No. 284,880 to Schnitzler et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 2,700,817 to Erickson. Adjustment of the blade gap can allow for variance in stubble length but is only one factor affecting aggressiveness of a safety razor. Unintentionally changing the blade gap can change subjective aggressiveness of the safety razor significantly.
Blade angle is another factor that influences aggressiveness of a safety razor. The blade angle can be defined as the angle between the blade edge and a line tangent to the cap and guard. There is a preferable angle of about 30 degrees from the face, but this may vary based on the different beards, stubble length, skin type (i.e. likeliness of razor irritation), and even different areas of the same beard (e.g. neck versus face). Traditional double-edged safety razor designs typically have a fixed geometry for clamping the blade between the cap and guard plate that provides for a single static blade angle. Some single-edge razor designs have provided mechanical adjustment mechanisms that can be prone to failure or slippage, or that not translate to double-edged safety razors, such as that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,080,651 to La Cas.
According to a first aspect, there is provided a safety razor comprising a handle, a cap having a central threaded stud to threadingly engage the handle, and a base plate defining a central aperture for receiving the central threaded stud therethrough. The base plate has a first side defining a first angled blade-engaging surface that defines a first blade angle when a safety razor blade is clamped between the cap and the first side of the base plate. In some aspects, the base plate can have a second side opposite the first side, the second side defining a second angled blade-engaging surface that defines a second blade angle when the safety razor is clamped between the cap and the second side of the base plate. In some aspects, the first angled blade-engaging surface and the second angled blade-engaging surface can each have separate surfaces on both sides of the central aperture to apply the first and second blade angle to each side of a double-edged razor blade. In yet other aspects, the first side and the second side of the base plate can each define a mating surface that abuts a top surface of the handle, the mating surface can be disposed below the angled blade-engaging surfaces. In a further aspect, the first angled blade-engaging surface and the second angled blade-engaging surface can each be interrupted by the corresponding mating surface. In yet another aspect, the cap can have a bullet post for aligning the safety razor blade and the base plate can have a corresponding alignment aperture for receiving the bullet post. In yet another aspect, the base plate can have a guard portion and the guard portion can define lather slots that correspond with an edge of the safety razor blade. In yet another aspect, the base plate can comprise a base portion having a guard portion and a modular aggressiveness defining portion that is replaceable and mates with the base portion to adjust aggressiveness of the safety razor.
According to a second aspect, there is provided a base plate for use in a modular safety razor, the base plate comprising a first side defining a first angled blade-engaging surface that defines a first blade angle when a safety razor blade is clamped between the cap and the first side of the base plate; and a second side opposite the first side, the second side defining a second angled blade-engaging surface that defines a second blade angle when the safety razor is clamped between the cap and the second side of the base plate.
According to yet another aspect, there is provided a modular safety razor shaving system that comprises a handle, a cap having a central threaded stud to threadingly engage the handle, and two or more base plates, each base plate defining a central aperture for receiving the central threaded stud therethrough, each base plate having a first side defining a first angled blade-engaging surface that defines a first blade angle when a safety razor blade is clamped between the cap and the first side of the base plate. In some aspects, the two or more base plates comprise a base portion and two or more modular aggressiveness defining portions, the base portion and modular aggressiveness defining portions have complementary mating surfaces and are held together by compression between the cap and the handle. In yet another aspect, the base plates can be double-sided, the base plate having a second side opposite the first side, the second side defining a second angled blade-engaging surface that defines a second blade angle when the safety razor is clamped between the cap and the second side of the base plate.
For a better understanding of the various embodiments described herein and to show more clearly how they may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings which show at least one exemplary embodiment, and in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, where considered appropriate, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the exemplary embodiments described herein. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments described herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the embodiments described herein. Furthermore, this description is not to be considered as limiting the scope of the embodiments described herein in any way, but rather as merely describing the implementations of various embodiments described herein.
Although some embodiments may explicitly refer to the double-edged safety razor shaving implements, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that teachings described herein can be applied to other shaving implements that have a similar cap and base plate structure. For example, and without limitation, devices that use a single edged blade can also be used to implement the embodiments described herein.
Term safety razor is used herein to refer to shaving implements for retaining a single user replaceable blade, and does not include cartridge-based razors or other disposable razors using multiple single edged blades.
Referring first to
Referring now to
Cap 320 can have at least one bullet post 324 that projects from the bottom surface of cap 320. Bullet post 324 are useful to aid in alignment of razor blade 330 which includes apertures to receive bullet posts 324 and central threaded stud 322. Similarly, base plate 350 defines central aperture 351 to allow central threaded stud to pass through to mate with a handle, such as handle 110, and base plate 350 further defines alignment aperture 355 that correspond with one or more bullet posts 324 of cap 320.
When a handle is screwed onto the cap and base plate assembly 300, pressure is applied to razor blade 330 positioned between cap 320 and base plate 350. This compression force causes razor blade 330 to conform to a blade-engaging surface 352 of base plate 350 to cause razor blade 330 to flex. The bottom surface of cap 320 provides concave surfaces to allow razor blade 330 to bend to provide a downward angle.
Blade-engaging surface 352 defines the blade angle of razor blade 330, and thus in part, defines the aggressiveness of the shave of the safety razor. The blade angle is defined relative to a line that would lie planar with the face when shaving that is illustrated by dotted line 360 and line 362 that is tangential to razor blade 330 near its end. The planar face line is formed between the edges cap 320 and the outer edge of guard portion 354 of base plate 350 that make contact with the face when shaving.
The height of blade-engaging surface 352 above the surface 364 of guard portion 354 also defines a blade gap 366 of the safety razor. Blade gap 366 is the gap between the blade and surface 364 of guard portion 354 to allow for light or heavy growth beards or to suit the skill or custom of the shaver. Blade gap 366 is also a factor that defines the aggressiveness of base plate 350.
Base plate 350 can be single-sided or double-sided. A double-sided embodiment in shown in
Double-sided base plate 350 has a second side opposite the first side, the second side also having a second blade-engaging surface 353 that define a second blade angle when razor blade 330 is clamped between cap 320 and the second blade-engaging surfaces 353 of the second side of base plate 350. This allows a single base plate to provide two different blade angles to allow a user of the safety razor to select their desired level of aggressiveness by selecting which side of base plate 350 is compressed against razor blade 330. As illustrated in
In some embodiments, each side of base plate 350 can provide a different blade gap 366. Blade-engaging surfaces 352 and 353 can each have a different height above the corresponding surface 364 and 365, respectively, of guard portion 354 that provides for differing blade gaps for each side of base plate 350.
First angled blade-engaging surface 352 and second angled blade-engaging surface 353 can have two separate surfaces on either side of the central stud aperture to allow for double-edged safety razors to be used. This allows the separate surfaces on both sides of the central aperture to apply the first and second blade angle to each side of a double-edged razor blade.
Base plate 350 is preferably symmetrical between the left and right sides as shown in
A modular safety razor system can comprise a cap, a handle and a number of differing base plates. Each of the base plates can differ by providing a different blade angle that is imparted to the razor blade by the blade engaging surface of the base plate. This allows the user of the modular safety razor system to select their preferred base plate when attaching their razor blade to select the aggressiveness of their shave. A modular safety razor system can use either double-sided base plates, such as that shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In some embodiments, mating surface 358 can interrupt angled blade-engaging surfaces 352. The curvature applied to razor blade 330 by base plate 350 and cap 320 provide rigidity and stability to razor blade 330 such that angled blade-engaging surfaces 352 do not need run the full length of base plate 350. This interruption and larger mating surface 358 allows handles with a larger top surface to mate with base plate 350. Mating surface 358 is disposed below angled blade-engaging surfaces as to not interfere with razor blade 330 when base plate 350 is flipped (i.e. when the opposing mating surface is abutting handle 110).
While the exemplary embodiments have been described herein, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. The invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, and scope of the claims is to be accorded an interpretation that encompasses all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1071970 | Stutzman | Sep 1913 | A |
1496295 | Chance | Jun 1924 | A |
1765805 | Schlussler | Jun 1930 | A |
1815745 | Thompson | Jul 1931 | A |
1923439 | Hukill | Aug 1933 | A |
2128772 | Green | Aug 1938 | A |
2141339 | Bauerle | Dec 1938 | A |
2270388 | Stampleman | Jan 1942 | A |
2321350 | Ardner | Jun 1943 | A |
2333894 | Smith | Nov 1943 | A |
2342161 | Muros | Feb 1944 | A |
2472807 | Clark | Jun 1949 | A |
2567811 | Haushalter | Sep 1951 | A |
2573980 | Mitchell | Nov 1951 | A |
2637101 | Cutler | May 1953 | A |
2637905 | Williams | May 1953 | A |
2669777 | Scully | Feb 1954 | A |
2671265 | Gavrilla et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2705834 | Lundy | Apr 1955 | A |
D175896 | Macmicking | Oct 1955 | S |
2794246 | Marsh et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
3015158 | Ayotte | Jan 1962 | A |
3079685 | Scully | Mar 1963 | A |
3088206 | Muros | May 1963 | A |
3129508 | Dootson | Apr 1964 | A |
3413720 | Mullen | Dec 1968 | A |
3583262 | Mullen | Jun 1971 | A |
3626591 | Robey | Dec 1971 | A |
3680211 | Keck | Aug 1972 | A |
3748735 | Whittington | Jul 1973 | A |
3777396 | Simonetti | Dec 1973 | A |
3889370 | Hale, III | Jun 1975 | A |
4066111 | Klebe, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4749014 | Schlund | Jun 1988 | A |
5363892 | Hild | Nov 1994 | A |
7100649 | Liu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
D763506 | Barrett | Aug 2016 | S |
20090007443 | Cuocolo, Jr. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110197446 | Macove | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20150298327 | Tomassetti et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150352737 | Hickam | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160075040 | Nordstrom | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
799671 | Nov 1968 | CA |
2710852 | Jul 2005 | CN |
2544425 | Apr 1976 | DE |
202013005918 | Sep 2013 | DE |
737509 | Dec 1932 | FR |
193704 | Mar 1923 | GB |
504986 | May 1939 | GB |
714122 | Aug 1954 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Nov. 27, 2015 in International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2015/000491. |
shaveinfo.com, “About Razor Blade Angles FAQ's”, http://shaveinfo.com/shaving-information/blade-angle.htm, May 2015. |
Maggard Razors Maggard Razors MR1 Knurled Stainless Steel Handle Safety Razor, http://www.maggardrazors.com/product/maggard-razors-mr1-chrome-safety-razor/, last accessed Jan. 5, 2016. |
Muehle Shaving Culture, Product Section—Safety Razors, http://www.muehle-shaving.com/en/Product-world/Razors/, last accessed Jan. 5, 2016. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/539,215 dated Sep. 26, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160075040 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |