This invention relates to a superstructure for supporting multiple hammocks.
Hammocks are most often used in wooded areas, where they can be hung from trees. Hammocks have the advantage of keeping a person off the ground, minimizing his contact with insects and ground moisture. Modern hammocks are inexpensive and very light—some only weigh a few ounces—and they promote air circulation, an advantage particularly in tropical conditions. However, not all locations have the trees needed for hammock use.
It would be beneficial to provide hammock users—particularly large groups of them, like Boy Scouts, adventure tourists and military units—with a lightweight superstructure from which they could suspend their hammocks, and which they could easily transport as needed.
An object of the invention is provided a structure for supporting multiple hammocks where trees are not available, or not plentiful, as in desert environments or on military bases.
Another object of the invention is to provide a hammock supporting structure which can be assembled quickly and without tools.
A further object is to provide a set of only a few different components from which hammock supporting structures if indefinite extent can be constructed.
These and other objects are attained by a superstructure for supporting multiple hammocks as described below.
In the accompanying drawings,
A simple example of the invention is shown in
While the inner ends of the peripheral spars shown in
In
The legs 12, 20 and spars 14, 16 are interconnected by hubs, not shown in
In use, hammocks are suspended between the tripod connecting hub and the bipod connecting hubs by looping the hammock suspension ropes over hooks or projections (illustrated) or through holes (not shown) in the hub and the bipod connectors.
If a good lone tree is available, it may be possible to use the tree trunk in lieu of the center tripod, with suitable modifications which would be within the skill of an ordinary person.
The invention is not limited to a hexagonal assembly.
I prefer that all the spars of the invention be identical, and that therefore the polygons making up the array be regular polygons (all equilateral triangles, all squares, or all regular hexagons), but other arrangements are possible. Making all the spars identical has the advantage of minimizing the number of different parts which must be kept on hand, and simplifying construction. Similarly, I prefer that all the legs be identical, although on hilly ground it may be necessary to use some legs of different lengths. One can compensate for minor variations in ground contour, simply by altering the leg angles. For this reason, it is preferred that the hubs be made of a strong but flexible material, such as a hard rubber or plastic, or that they have free play or some other way of allowing the leg angles to be changed according to ground contour.
The number of tubes or legs at each supporting location may be judiciously chosen to minimize the number of legs per hammock, without making the structure unstable. Plainly, using only unipods as supports will not work, since without any diagonal bracing, the structure would collapse sideways under load (“racking” failure). On the other hand, tripods are not required at every support point. It can be shown that for a polygonal spar arrangement having N spars, a minimum of 2N supporting legs are required. For example, three spars forming a triangle can be supported at one vertex by a tripod, at one vertex by a bipod, and at the remaining vertex by a unipod, and be stable in all directions. A square can be supported by tripods at opposite corners, and unipods at the other two corners. Thus, an array may be constructed in which only some of the stanchions are tripods, the remainder being bipods and/or unipods.
An advantage of the invention is that it enables one to build a hammock-supporting structure of indefinite or limitless size from as few a three different stock components (legs, spars, connecting hubs).
Since the invention is subject to modifications and variations, it is intended that the foregoing description and the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as only illustrative of the invention defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
34931 | Timmons et al. | Apr 1862 | A |
627626 | Owens | Jun 1899 | A |
851927 | Fyfe | Apr 1907 | A |
1346973 | Padden | Jul 1920 | A |
1434841 | Pittoni | Nov 1922 | A |
1471465 | Hinton | Oct 1923 | A |
1732154 | Cunningham | Oct 1929 | A |
1961915 | Salmen, Jr. | Jun 1934 | A |
2126636 | Horne | Aug 1938 | A |
2251299 | Spangler | Aug 1941 | A |
2618788 | Cole | Nov 1952 | A |
3376879 | Huddle | Apr 1968 | A |
5035012 | Westrich | Jul 1991 | A |
5423341 | Brady | Jun 1995 | A |
5666986 | Fox | Sep 1997 | A |
5701616 | Rosenquist | Dec 1997 | A |
5755641 | Pardella | May 1998 | A |
6470518 | Ke | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6748962 | Miller | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20020153034 | Miller | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040222336 | Miller | Nov 2004 | A1 |