1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to scientific instrumentation. More particularly, the present invention relates to microtiter plates and test tube racks.
2. Description of the Related Art
The standard 96-well test tube racks and 96-well microtiter plates are a workhorse in the life science, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical industry. Under the specifications of the industry standard defined by the Society for Biomolecular Screening (SBS), the 96 wells are arranged in a rectangular matrix of 8 rows×12 columns, with a pitch size of 9 mm. The overall dimensions of the plate are defined by its outer skirt, which is 127.6 mm×85.3 mm. Higher-density plates are based on this basic design, with the outside, skirt dimensions being maintained constant while the pitch size is reduced by ½ for 384-well plates, by ¼ for 1536-well plates and by ⅙ for 3456-well plates.
The usefulness of these items is significantly extended by the existence of array pipetters equipped with 96 or 384 tips that are arranged in rectangular matrices of 8×12 or 16×24 with pitch sizes of 9 mm or 4.5 mm, respectively. With these devices, pipetting into and out of multi-well plates can be done in a parallel, high-throughput fashion. Much of high-throughput screening relies on the joint application of these plate and pipetting technologies.
A drawback with SBS standard devices is that their fixed geometry and size may not be amenable for use with a variety of scientific instrumentation. Thus, there is a need for a more flexible design that still offers the benefits associated with using SBS standard array pipetters.
One example where the size of SBS standard racks and plates limits their use is in centrifugation. In many applications, it is often necessary to centrifuge the tubes or plates. There are numerous centrifuges that work with these devices that use swinging bucket rotors. The plates or racks are deposited into these rotors in the upright position. When the rotor starts spinning, the buckets swing up and the plates or racks are centrifuged horizontally. This technology only allows for low-g centrifugation. These plate centrifuges perform in the range of 2000 g, which is only enough to gently pellet cells. However, in applications where much tighter pellets are required, e.g., clearing of protein precipitates, much higher centrifugation in the range of 10,000-20,000 g is needed. Thus, there is a need for devices and methods that provide the option of high g centrifugation of multiple samples.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises a modular test tube rack, comprising a first test tube sub-rack configured to hold a plurality of test tubes; and at least one additional test tube sub-rack configured to hold a plurality of test tubes, wherein the additional test tube sub-rack is removably coupled to the first test tube sub-rack.
The invention also comprises a microtiter plate comprising a first section comprising a plurality of wells and a second section comprising a plurality of wells, wherein the second section is removably coupled to the first section.
Preferably, each sub-section of the test tube rack or microtiter plate is adapted to withstand an acceleration of greater than 10,000 g.
The invention further comprises a microtiter plate comprising a plate with a plurality of wells formed therein, the plate constructed of a material adapted to withstand an acceleration of greater than 5000 g. The plate may, for example, be formed from carbon fiber or glass fiber reinforced plastic.
In another embodiment, the invention comprises a method of processing a plurality of samples. The method may comprise pipetting at least a component of the samples into wells on removably coupled sections of a multi-section container, wherein each section comprises a plurality of wells, decoupling the sections from each other, and processing each section.
In one embodiment, a modular test tube rack comprises two or more sub-racks, each capable of holding multiple test tubes. One embodiment of a sub-rack is depicted in
In some embodiments, a set of coupled sub-racks is held together as a full test tube rack by a skirt, for example as shown in
To facilitate assembly and disassembly of the modular test tube rack, the skirt may include a side 206 that is openable.
Sub-racks are secured within the skirt via a tongue 216 and a groove 218. The tongue 216 is located on the side of the skirt opposite the side 206 that can open. The groove is located within side 206. The tongue 216 fits within the groove of the sub-rack that is placed against the side opposite side 206. The tongue of the sub-rack that is placed next to side 206 fits within groove 218 when the side 206 is closed. In this manner, the sub-racks are secured within the skirt by sequential tongue and groove interaction from tongue 216, through the tongue and grooves coupling each sub-rack to their adjacent sub-racks, to groove 218. Set screws 220 can also be provided which thread inward to press slightly against the sides of the sub-racks so that the fit inside the skirt is snug.
Assembly and disassembly of the test tube rack is illustrated in
Returning now to an advantageous latching mechanism for the swinging skirt door 206,
When the door is pushed closed, the latch 526 presses against the piston 521, pushing the piston inward toward the rear of the notch and off of the surface 515 of the release actuator. This allows the thicker portion of the release actuator shaft to rise up in the direction of arrow 517, and vertically into an orifice 530 in the bottom of the latch. The center of the orifice 530 is shifted inward from the front surface of the latch by an amount greater than its radius so that the top of the thicker shaft is trapped inside the orifice after the shaft rises up in the direction of arrow 517, thereby engaging the latch 526 to the release actuator and holding the door closed. The upper portion of the latch includes a hemispherical notch 528, in which the thinner portion of the release actuator shaft rests when the door is closed. This configuration is illustrated in
To open the door again, the button 510 of the release actuator is pushed down, which pushes the top of the thicker shaft portion out of the orifice. The spring biased piston 520 then pushes the latch 526 away from the release actuator, slides back over the upper surface 515 of the thicker shaft portion of the release actuator and holds the release actuator in the downward position as in
A significant benefit of the modular test tube rack described above is that the sub-racks can be made of a size that conveniently fits in a variety of scientific instrumentation. For example, the sub-racks may be made to fit in fixed centrifuge rotors that are commercially available from Eppendorf for example. Prior to the present invention, these fixed rotor designs were used for PCR tubes and the like, but could not be used with SBS standard tube racks or multi-well plates.
Although the above discussion focuses on a specific embodiment of a test tube rack, in some embodiments, a modular microtiter plate may be created instead of a modular test tube rack. In these embodiments, two or more sub-plates have a coupling mechanism that allows the sub-plates to be coupled together to form a stable microtiter plate. For example, each sub-plate may contain fittings that snap to fittings on another sub-plate. A skirt as described above may also be provided. Thus, the construction of a modular multi-well plate can be performed in a manner analogous to that described in detail above. In some embodiments, the assembled plate has standard SBS size and geometry. Thus, standard SBS array pipetters may be used with the assembled plate, which may then be disassembled into sub-plates of sizes suitable for use in a particular piece of scientific instrumentation, such as a fixed-rotor centrifuge.
In some embodiments, microtiter plates are constructed of materials capable of withstanding the high g forces generated in fixed-rotor centrifuges. For this application, material selection becomes a significant issue. The plates may, for example, by constructed using metal casting followed by machining. Because this would be relatively expensive, it is advantageous to use a plastic material that is sufficiently strong to withstand the forces involved. It is especially advantageous to select a material with a flexural modulus of at least about 5 GPa and/or a flexural strength of at least about 120 MPa, measured in accordance with ASTM D790. Plastics with these high strengths typically are glass fiber or carbon fiber reinforced. Glass or carbon fiber reinforced polyimide is one example of high strength plastic that could be used in this application. In various embodiments, the plates are capable of withstanding accelerations of 5000 g, 8000 g, 10,000 g, 15,000 g, or 20,000 g. In some applications, it may be desirable to place low reflectivity and/or low background fluorescence coatings onto high strength plastic base materials. It also might be desirable to use a different transparent material for the base (glass or clear polycarbonate would be possible options), and a high strength plastic material which may be opaque for the side walls/body of the plate or plate segments.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/475,381, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,178,055, entitled Modular Test Tube Rack, filed May 29, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/853,901, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,553,671, entitled Modular Test Tube Rack, filed on May 25, 2004. The disclosures of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3713771 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3891140 | Ayres | Jun 1975 | A |
3993452 | Moulding | Nov 1976 | A |
4295601 | Cowell | Oct 1981 | A |
4877659 | Vince | Oct 1989 | A |
4907893 | Niemeck et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5256314 | Driessen | Oct 1993 | A |
5651941 | Stark et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5916527 | Haswell | Jun 1999 | A |
6303387 | Birch et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6416455 | Aizawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6489169 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7211224 | Olivier | May 2007 | B2 |
7553671 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8178055 | Sinclair et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20030170883 | Martin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120201727 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12475381 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13450303 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10853901 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 12475381 | US |