Web provisioning technology has been developed to build Web sites for the Internet and/or intranets. Web provisioning generally includes selecting a site template that defines the structure and the content of a Web site. Based on the content of the site template, Web provisioning technology populates the initial page, the directories, and the site structures of the Web site. Web provisioning technology enables a user to provision multiple Web sites from a single site template. As a result, the predefined site templates enable a user to quickly create Web sites without spending much time on deciding how the sites should look or function.
Conventionally, a site template is a monolithic script describing functionalities that a Web site can provision. Different Web sites may have very different functionality requirements. For example, a Web site for an individual user may require functionalities that are quite different from a Web site for a group of users. Thus, multiple site templates may be designed for different Web sites to provision.
Different site templates may contain the same or similar functionalities. For site templates such as the site template 100 that is implemented as a monolithic document including detailed information for each functionality, when a site template developer needs to use functionalities provisioned in other site templates, the developer often copies the functionalities from the other site templates. For example, if the site template that a developer is creating needs to use the Documents functionality 102 in the site template 100, the developer needs to copy all the default data and definitions for the Documents functionality 102 from the site template 100 and paste the copied information into the new site template.
Such a copy and paste approach may lead to several problems. For example, if the Documents functionality 102 in the site template 100 is updated, the Documents functionality that has been copied to the new site template would not be automatically updated. That is, changes to a functionality provided by a site template would not be automatically replicated in site templates copying the functionality from the site template.
Alternatively, a developer of a site template could also use a loosely bound, file-based linking mechanism to indirectly point at files in other site templates. This approach had the benefit of consolidating logic in a central location, i.e., the site template. However, because such linking is inherently unstructured, any change to the file structure of the other site templates would void the links and thus break any dependent site templates containing the links. Therefore, this approach of linking common entities in site templates was fragile.
In addition, in some Web provisioning platforms such as Microsoft SharePoint®, a Web site can only use provisioning information from the site template the Web site is provisioned from. The site template serves as a foundation and limits which functionalities can be added to the provisioned Web site. As a result, the Web site is constrained to the set of functionalities included in the site template. The Web site cannot be modified to support functionalities different from the functionalities provided by the site template. However, given that business requirements for a Web site may change from time to time, a Web site may evolve during its lifetime and the functionalities required for the Web site may change. The monolithic site template implementation thus limits the evolution of Web sites provisioned from a monolithic site template.
Thus, conventional Web provisioning technology uses a monolithic site template providing all detailed information of functionalities that a Web site can provision. This conventional approach allows users to quickly create Web sites without spending much time on deciding how the Web site should look. However, this conventional approach does not allow efficient modifications of functionalities that are shared by different site templates. This conventional approach also does not allow sites provisioned from a site template to evolve the functionalities the site supports after the provisioning process.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The invention addresses the above-identified limitations by modularizing functionalities provided for Web sites. These modularized functionalities are also called features. A feature includes a package of provisioning elements that work together to provide a specific functionality for a Web site. A provisioning element is an atomic unit within a feature. A site template can reference different features. A Web site can be provisioned based on the site template. Features in the Web site can then be customized to meet the specific needs of the Web site. Additional features may be added to the Web site that are not referenced by the site template. In the event that the requirements for the Web site change, features may be added to or removed from the Web site.
As a result, the invention provides a modularized site provisioning mechanism. This mechanism makes it easier to create a Web site by customizing features included in the site template that the Web site provisions and/or add new features to the Web site. Definitions for functionalities are modularized and thus sharable. Administratively, after provisioning a Web site according to a site template, an administrator can add or remove features from the site template. When requirements for a Web site change, an administrator can also reinvoke the provisioning process to customize the existing features or add new features to the Web site.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Embodiments of the invention modularize functionalities available for different Web sites to provision. The modularized functionalities are also called features. A Web site may be created by provisioning a site template. A site template may be a package containing information to form a basic definition of a Web site. In exemplary embodiments of the invention, the package includes references to different features that a Web site may provision.
In exemplary embodiments of the invention, a feature may be implemented as an XML file containing information that describes the feature, what its functions are, and a list of other contents.
Besides references 304 to existing provisioning elements, the feature 302 may further include custom code 306. The custom code 306 can provide capabilities to meet specific custom needs if existing provisioning elements do not satisfy the custom need. The custom code 306 may also be used to configure the feature 302 or other entities in or outside the feature 302.
The feature 302 may further include a set of metadata 308. The metadata 308 defines one or more properties associated with the feature 302. For example, if the feature 302 is the exemplary Document Library feature 202 illustrated in
The feature 302 may further include activation dependency information 310. A feature may depend on other features. For example, the exemplary Favorite Items feature 206 may include items that link to video clips in the video Clips Library feature 204. In order for a user to use the items, the Video Clips Library feature 204 needs to be activated at first. Thus, the Favorite Items feature 206 has an activation dependency on the Video Clips Library feature 204.
In embodiments of the invention, a feature may have a specific scope. For example, features in a Web farm environment may be scoped at an individual Web site level, at a site collection level, or at the Web farm level. A feature scoped at the site collection level contains functionalities that are intended to be applied to the site collection as a whole, as well as functionalities that can be applied on a per-site basis. A feature scoped at the Web farm level is also called a global feature, which is always activated for sites in the Web farm. Such feature includes provisioning elements that are critical for implementing applications and logics for the Web farm.
As noted above, in embodiments of the invention, a site template references features. If a site template references a feature, then the provisioning of the site template activates the feature for the new site. Thus, whereas previously a site template developer needed to copy all needed functionalities into a site template, the developer now only needs to reference corresponding features containing the needed functionalities in the site template. In addition, if a site template does not reference specific features needed by a site provisioning from the site template, the specific features can be added to and activated for the site. Furthermore, an administrator of a site can also choose to deactivate features that are already included in the site. The deactivation removes the functionality provided by the features from the site. This option allows the administrator to restrict the functionalities or complexity level of a site after it has been provisioned.
In exemplary embodiments of the invention, a site template developer creates a site template and references features providing the functionalities desired for the site template.
Prior to the process 400, functionalities intended for one or more Web sites have been modularized into features such as the exemplary features illustrated in
The process 400 starts by creating a site template such as a site template 200 illustrated in
If the answer to decision block 406 is YES, meaning that the site template needs custom functionality that is not provided by existing features, the developer proceeds to create a definition for a new feature. See block 408. A feature definition defines what a feature is and may include information such as the name, type, and version of the feature. The developer then proceeds to add references to provisioning elements to the new feature definition. See block 410. The developer then adds a reference to the new feature in the site template. See block 412. At this moment, the process 400 loops back to the decision block 406 to determine whether the site template needs another custom functionality that is not provided by existing features. If the answer is YES, blocks 408-412 are repeated to create new features providing additional custom functionalities. If no new feature needs to be created, the process 400 terminates.
In some circumstances, the Web site may require features that are not referenced in the site template. In embodiments of the invention, an administrator of the Web site adds these features to the Web site by installing these features and activating these features for the Web site. See block 506.
Furthermore, after a Web site has been provisioned from a site template, the requirements for the Web site may change over time. For example, a Web site that is initially provisioned for marketing personnel may later expand to include sales personnel. As a result, the Web site needs to add functionalities that are suitable for the sales personnel. In such a situation, the Web site may need to be reprovisioned, e.g., features may be removed or added to the Web site to meet the new requirements for the Web site. Therefore, after provisioning a Web site, the process 500 may check, from time to time, whether there is a new requirement for the Web site. See decision block 508. If the answer to decision block 508 is YES, the process 500 loops back to block 504 to customize existing features in the Web site and/or to add new features to the Web site (block 506). If the answer to decision block 508 is NO, the process 500 does not proceed further.
In embodiments of the invention, the modularized Web provisioning process 500 can be accomplished through a command-line tool, an object model, or a graphic user interface. For example, the command-line tool may allow a user such as an administrator to display available features, to install or uninstall features, to activate or deactivate features, and/or to enumerate existing features in a Web site. An exemplary object model may include a site object for each Web site. The site object may include a feature collection object identifying all feature objects activated for the Web site. Each feature object may include a set of properties that contain metadata for the feature. Each feature object may also include a feature definition object containing the base definition of the feature such as what the feature is, and the name, type, and version of the feature. The feature collection object may further include methods that allow a user to add a feature object to the site object. The addition activates the feature for the site. The feature collection object may also include methods for removing a feature object from the collection object. The removal is equivalent to deactivating the feature from the site. The object model may include other objects and their associated data and methods for facilitating the modularized Web provisioning process 500.
Preferably, information for the modularized Web provisioning process 500 can also be received through a graphic user interface. For example,
In some embodiments of the invention, a feature may also include metadata specifying where and how the feature may be used. An administrator can thus use the user interface 600 to restrict the behavior of the feature accordingly. For example, an administrator can configure the properties of the feature to restrict its availability to only specific sites. For instance, only product marketing and sales sites may have the access to features that expose corporate sales data. Meanwhile, a developer of a feature could configure the metadata of the feature so that the feature can only be activated if certain licensing provisions have been met; e.g., the licensing provision may only allow a feature to be in use on five sites at a given time. As a result, modularizing functionalities for Web provisioning enables flexible and efficient administration of a Web provisioning process.
While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5325527 | Cwikowski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
5586235 | Kauffman | Dec 1996 | A |
5717924 | Kawai | Feb 1998 | A |
5838918 | Prager et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6026433 | D'Arlach et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6093215 | Buxton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6134559 | Brumme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6304886 | Bernardo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343377 | Gessner et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6469714 | Buxton et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6480508 | Mwikalo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6601057 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622168 | Datta | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6684369 | Bernardo et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691165 | Bruck | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697825 | Underwood et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6845503 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6910208 | Zimniewicz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931599 | Korenshtein | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947992 | Shachor | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6981250 | Wiltamuth et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7039658 | Starkey | May 2006 | B2 |
7047318 | Svedloff | May 2006 | B1 |
7047463 | Organ et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058704 | Mangipudi | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7152207 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7181539 | Knight et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7269664 | Hutsch et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7287090 | Berg | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7448022 | Ram et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7493341 | Israel et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7558857 | Ammerlaan et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577661 | Bankston et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7619761 | Bankston et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640328 | Lele | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7979789 | Ammerlaan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010042073 | Saether et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004824 | Cuan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038256 | Nguyen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049788 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069327 | Chauvel | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078174 | Sim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083097 | Warrington | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030014442 | Shiigi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030074634 | Emmelmann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030126202 | Watt | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140143 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172129 | Moses et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225853 | Wang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003266 | Moshir et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010786 | Cool et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015476 | Twaddle | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025076 | Cabrera et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046789 | Inanoria | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068714 | Deimel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103073 | Blake | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103195 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103433 | Regeard | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128618 | Datta | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148565 | Davis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168123 | Lomelin-Stoupignan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168153 | Marvin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205572 | Fields et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210320 | Pandya | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216084 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040268228 | Croney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005261 | Severin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015357 | Shahidi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015471 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071758 | Ehrich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075115 | Corneille et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080891 | Cauthron | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102284 | Srinivasan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138165 | Tang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149549 | Jaspers et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187895 | Paya et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060015619 | Tse et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015626 | Hallamaa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080336 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060129516 | Bradford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161895 | Speeter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070061705 | Ammerlaan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076228 | Apelbaum et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080034369 | Polizzi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120600 | Deimel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0812088 | Dec 1997 | EP |
06110715 | Apr 1994 | JP |
11003261 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2001075900 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001273269 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2004508616 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2178240 | Jan 2002 | RU |
2250490 | Apr 2005 | RU |
WO 0198926 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03107147 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005010689 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062201 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070061705 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |