This invention relates generally to invasive devices and methods for treatment of the heart, including devices and methods for stimulation of the heart muscle. More particularly, this invention relates to control of cellular tissue, specifically the modulation of intracellular calcium concentration in cardiac muscle cells.
Cardiac insufficiency, characterized inter alia by a reduction in cardiac output, is a common, well-known and well-documented heart malfunction. It develops as a result of congenital defects or as an end-effect of many diseases. Cardiac output, i.e., the output of the heart per unit time, is the product of stroke volume and heart rate. Hence, variations in cardiac output can be produced by changes in cardiac rate or stroke volume. The stroke volume can be influenced, for example, by changing the strength of cardiac contraction, by changing the length of the cardiac muscle fibers, and by changing contractility of cardiac muscle independent of fiber length. The heart rate and rhythm influence the cardiac output both directly and indirectly, since changes in the rate and rhythm also affect myocardial contractility.
The human body normally regulates the cardiac output in response to body needs by changing the heart rate, as during physical exercise, and/or by adapting the stroke volume. Under pathological conditions, however, some of the normal regulatory mechanisms may be damaged. For example, heart tissue damaged due to-myocardial infarct typically cannot sustain normal pumping function, leading to a reduction in stroke volume, and hence of cardiac output. The body may react to such a reduction by increasing the heart rate, thus imposing long term strain on the heart muscles, leading in more severe cases to heart failure. There is thus a need for devices and treatments that can regulate the cardiac output, so as to compensate for the deficiencies in the normal regulation mechanisms.
In response to this need, modern cardiology has developed means to control various parameters associated with the heart's operation. Pharmaceuticals, for example, may be used to influence the conduction velocity, excitability, contractility and duration of the refractory period of the heart tissue. These pharmaceuticals are used to treat arrhythmia, enhance cardiac output and prevent fibrillation. Pharmaceuticals are generally limited in effectiveness in that they affect both healthy and diseased segments of the heart, usually, with a relatively low precision. They frequently also have unwanted side-effects.
A special kind of control can be achieved using implantable electronic devices, which provide excitatory electrical stimulation to the heart to control directly the heart rate and/or rhythm. For example, a pacemaker, an electronic device which is typically implanted in the heart to support the heart's electrical excitation system or to bypass a blocked portion of the conduction system. Another type of cardiac electronic device is a defibrillator, which senses fibrillation in the heart and applies a high voltage impulse to “reset” the heart. While electronic pacemakers can control the heart rate, however, they are limited in their capacity to enhance cardiac output, and they are known to reduce stroke volume in at least some instances. Defibrillators are useful in treating arrhythmia when it occurs (although they are painful to the patient and traumatic to the heart), but they provide no long-term amelioration of cardiac insufficiency.
Thus, none of the treatments known in the art allow effective, long-term regulation of cardiac output. PCT patent application PCT/IL97/00012, published as WO 97/25098, to Ben-Haim et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes methods for modifying the force of contraction of at least a portion a heart chamber by applying a non-excitatory electric field to the heart at a delay after electrical activation of the portion. The non-excitatory field is such as does not induce new activation potentials in cardiac muscle cells, but rather modifies the cells' response to the activation.
It is an object of some aspects of the present invention to provide improved methods and apparatus for controlling calcium concentration in biological tissue.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide methods and apparatus for modulating intracellular calcium concentration in cardiac tissue.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide methods and apparatus for modulating cardiac contractibility.
These and other objects of the invention will become more apparent form the discussion below.
In preferred embodiments of the present invention, a controller comprises a non-excitatory stimulation probe, including one or more non-excitatory stimulation electrodes, at least one sensor, preferably a sensing electrode; and electronic control circuitry, coupled to the stimulation probe and sensor. The stimulation electrodes and, preferably, the sensor are implemented in the heart. Alternatively, a sensing electrode may be placed on a body surface. The circuitry receives signals from the sensor, indicative of the heart's activity, and responsive thereto, drives the stimulation electrodes to provide non-excitatory electrical stimulation to the heart. A non-excitatory electrical field, current or voltage is passed through biological tissue, such as cardiac tissue, or in its proximity, resulting in either changing trans-membranal calcium ion fluxes or and/or intracellular stores content.
The term “non-excitatory electrical stimulation” (“IDS”) in the context of the present patent application and in the claims, refers to electrical pulses that do not induce new activation potentials to propagate in cardiac muscle cells. Rather, such pulses generally affect the response of the heart muscle to the action potentials, possibly by modulating cell contractility within selected segments of the cardiac muscle.
In any case, the effect of the device on intracellular calcium concentration is preferably regulated by changing the timing of the non-excitatory stimulation pulse relative to the heart's activity, preferably relative to the heart's local electrical activity or ECG signals received by the sensing electrode, and/or by changing other pulse characteristics, such as voltage, current, duration, polarity, waveform and frequency of the waveform. Preferably, the device senses the heart's sinus rhythm and applies and synchronizes the stimulation pulse relative thereto, preferably with a delay before the onset of the stimulation pulse. Additionally, the circuitry may analyze the signals, for example, to determine the QT interval, so as to adjust the stimulation pulses responsive thereto. Alternatively, when the heart's rhythm is irregular, due to ventricular premature beats (VPB's) or other cardiac arrhythmias, the device preferably identifies and analyzes the irregularity, using signal processing methods known in the art, and adjusts or withholds the stimulation pulse accordingly.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention the control circuitry is contained within a console external to the body, and the electrodes are fed percutaneously into the subject's vascular system, for example, through the femoral artery, and are implanted in the heart. Such embodiments are useful particularly in short-term therapy to regulate and stabilize the subject's hemodynamics following an insult or trauma, for example, open heart surgery or MI.
In alternative preferred embodiments of the present invention, the electronic control circuitry is contained within a miniaturized, implantable case, similar to pacemaker cases known in the art.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the non-excitatory stimulation electrodes known in the art, such as pacing or electrophysiology electrodes. Preferably, the stimulation electrodes comprise large-area carbon electrodes or any other metal electrodes such as titanium nitrate, iridium oxide, most preferably vitreous carbon, or alternatively, pyro-carbon. Both types of carbon materials are known for their compatibility with heart tissue, in-vivo durability and excellent electrical properties, including high electrical conductivity. Thus, they allow a relatively high electrical current to be delivered to a relatively large segment of the heart tissue, without inducing electrical excitation.
In other preferred embodiments of the present invention, the non-excitatory stimulation electrodes are inserted into one of the blood vessels of the heart, preferably into the coronary sinus, or alternatively, into a coronary artery.
In another preferred embodiment of this type, different stimulation pulses are applied to respective ones or groups of the plurality of stimulation electrodes. Preferably, the different stimulation pulses are applied to the respective electrodes with a predetermined delay between the different pulses. The delay may be varied so as to achieve a desired hemodynamic effect, for example, to maximize the increase in stroke volume.
In still other such preferred embodiments, the positions of the plurality of stimulation electrodes and/or characteristics of the stimulation pulses applied thereto are optimized responsive to clinical characteristics of the heart. Preferably, before insertion of the electrodes, a map of the heart is produced, for example, an electrophysiological map, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,809, or a phase-dependent geometrical map, as described in PCT Patent Application PCT/IL97/00011, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Preferably, the map includes information regarding the viability of the heart tissue, for example, based on local contractility or electrical activity. The non-excitatory stimulation electrodes are then positioned responsive to the map.
Preferably, applying the IDS signal includes conveying electrical energy to cells of the heart, such that action potentials are generally not generated in the cells responsive to the application of the non-excitatory signal.
Further preferably, the IDS signal is applied to improve hemodynamic performance of the heart. Preferably, the IDS signal is applied in order to increase contractility of the heart or, alternatively or additionally, to increase systolic pressure generated by the heart.
In a preferred embodiment, applying the IDS signal includes sensing physiological variables and applying the signal responsive thereto. Preferably, sensing the variable includes detecting an electrical depolarization wave in the tissue. Alternatively, sensing the variable includes sensing a hemodynamic parameter. Preferably, applying the pacing pulses include controlling application of the pacing pulses responsive to the variable, wherein controlling the application of the pacing pulses includes making a transition from a first stimulation mode to a second stimulation mode responsive to the variable.
There is also provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for stimulating cardiac tissue, including:
Preferably, the at least one of the electrodes to which the IDS signal is applied includes one of the electrodes to which the pacing pulses are applied.
Further preferably, at least one of the pacing sites is in the left ventricle, and the IDS signal is applied to an electrode in the left ventricle.
Preferably, the control unit applies the IDS signal between during a time period which begins between about 0 and 100 ms after the onset of a pacing pulse applied by the control unit, wherein the time period is set so as to substantially eliminate the possibility that a propagating action potential will be generated responsive to application of the IDS signal. Preferably, the time period begins between about 10 and 50 ms after the onset of the pacing pulse.
Preferably, the IDS signal is applied in order to increase contractility of the heart or, alternatively or additionally, in order to increase systolic pressure generated by the heart.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus includes a sensor, which senses a physiological variable, wherein the control unit receives an input from the sensor and applies the IDS signal responsive thereto. Preferably, the sensor detects an electrical depolarization wave in the tissue. Alternatively (or additionally, the sensor senses a hemodynamic: parameter or senses motion. Preferably, the control unit controls application of the pacing pulses responsive to the variable. Further preferably the control unit makes a transition from a first stimulation mode to a second stimulation mode responsive to the variable.
The present invention will be more fully understood form the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:
This invention is designed to modulate intracellular calcium concentration in a biological tissue using a non-excitatory electrical signal (IDS). In particular, the invention relates to the modulation of the intracellular calcium in cardiac muscle cells and thus the modulation of cardiac contractility. According to this invention a non-excitatory electrical field, current or voltage is passed through the tissue or in its proximity, resulting in either changing trans-membranal calcium ion fluxes or an intracellular calcium stores content. In another aspect of the invention the electrical field may interfere/enhance the affinity of intracellular calcium binding elements to calcium. In a further aspect the rise in intracellular calcium concentrations may initiate a cascade of events including, but not limited to, phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, gene transcription, and/or post translation modification.
Systems are disclosed which utilize the application of electrical current to a tissue, effecting tissue contractility by means of modulating intracellular calcium. At least one pair of electrodes is used for applying the signal. Electrode placement is adapted for achieving the maximum desired effect. The electrodes are attached to an either implantable or external device with programming capabilities. This device can be tested and calibrated non-invasively by external mechanisms. In addition, stimulation parameters can be adjusted by a similar programming mechanism.
The characteristics of the electrodes used for the stimulation are important. This invention utilizes both uni-polar and bi-polar electrode configurations.
A novel aspect of this method of modulating intracellular calcium in cells is the ability to adjust the timing and the amount of calcium increase/decrease using temporal electrical current rather than systemic pharmacological agents.
The accompanying figures show changes in intracellular calcium resulting from the application of the IDS signal together with experimental evidence on the effect of the IDS signal on the calcium handling in the cell.
The initial increase in the contractile force also supports the possible increase in the affinity of intracellular calcium binding elements that cause part of the increase in the contraction force.
All such variations, applications and subcombinations of elements are considered to be within scope of the present invention. It will thus be appreciated that the preferred embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and the full scope of the invention is limited only by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
116699 | Jan 1996 | IL | national |
119261 | Sep 1996 | IL | national |
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/039,845, filed Oct. 23, 2001, which is in turn a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/563,544, filed May 1, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,363,279, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/101,723, filed Aug. 13, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,317,631, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL97/00012, filed Jan. 8, 1997, which is based upon and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/595,365, filed Feb. 1, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,738,096, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/009,769, filed Jan. 11, 1996, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/011,117, filed Feb. 5, 1996, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/026,392, filed Sep. 16, 1996; and this application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/IB00/01523, filed Oct. 4, 2000, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/157,511, filed Oct. 4, 1999, which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1918386 | Esau | Jul 1933 | A |
3211154 | Becker et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3541390 | Jahnks | Nov 1970 | A |
3572345 | Auphan | Mar 1971 | A |
3587567 | Schiff | Jun 1971 | A |
3651805 | Breiling | Mar 1972 | A |
3651806 | Hirshberg | Mar 1972 | A |
3796221 | Hagfors | Mar 1974 | A |
3911930 | Hagfors et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3924641 | Weiss | Dec 1975 | A |
3933147 | Du Vall et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3942536 | Mirowski et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3944740 | Murase et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3952750 | Mirowski et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4030509 | Heilman et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4055190 | Tany | Oct 1977 | A |
4106494 | McEachern | Aug 1978 | A |
4164216 | Person | Aug 1979 | A |
4168711 | Cannon, III et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4184493 | Langer et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4202340 | Langer et al. | May 1980 | A |
4223678 | Langer et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4237895 | Johnson | Dec 1980 | A |
4273114 | Barkalow et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4293734 | Pepper, Jr. | Oct 1981 | A |
4312354 | Walters | Jan 1982 | A |
4315503 | Ryaby et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4316472 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4337776 | Daly et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4369791 | Friedman | Jan 1983 | A |
4384585 | Zipes | May 1983 | A |
4387717 | Brownlee et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4403614 | Engle et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4406288 | Horwinski et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4407288 | Langer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4411268 | Cox | Oct 1983 | A |
4428366 | Findl et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4440172 | Langer | Apr 1984 | A |
4506680 | Stokes | Mar 1985 | A |
4537195 | McDonnell | Aug 1985 | A |
4537203 | Machida | Aug 1985 | A |
4543738 | Mower | Oct 1985 | A |
4543956 | Herscovici | Oct 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
4554922 | Prystowsky et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4554992 | Kassai | Nov 1985 | A |
4559946 | Mower | Dec 1985 | A |
4559947 | Renger et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4566456 | Koning et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4572191 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4628934 | Pohndorf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637397 | Jones et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639720 | Rympalski et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4651716 | Forester et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4674508 | DeCote | Jun 1987 | A |
4679572 | Baker, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686332 | Greanias et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690155 | Hess | Sep 1987 | A |
4693253 | Adams | Sep 1987 | A |
4708145 | Tacker et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4717581 | Robblee | Jan 1988 | A |
4726279 | Kepler et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4726379 | Altman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4765341 | Mower et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4807632 | Liess et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834100 | Charms | May 1989 | A |
4850959 | Findl | Jul 1989 | A |
4870974 | Wang | Oct 1989 | A |
4878553 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884576 | Alt | Dec 1989 | A |
4914624 | Dunthorn et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4928688 | Mower | May 1990 | A |
4967749 | Cohen | Nov 1990 | A |
4971058 | Pless et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979507 | Heinz et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4988837 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996984 | Sweeney | Mar 1991 | A |
4998531 | Bocchi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4998532 | Griffith | Mar 1991 | A |
5002052 | Haluska et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003976 | Alt | Apr 1991 | A |
5018522 | Mehra | May 1991 | A |
5020544 | Dahl et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022396 | Watanabe | Jun 1991 | A |
5026397 | Aoki et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031617 | Klettner | Jul 1991 | A |
5041107 | Heil | Aug 1991 | A |
5044375 | Bach, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5048522 | Petrofsky | Sep 1991 | A |
5050612 | Matsumura | Sep 1991 | A |
5063929 | Bartelt et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5067940 | Liboff et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5083564 | Scherlag | Jan 1992 | A |
5085218 | Heil et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5087243 | Avitall | Feb 1992 | A |
5097832 | Buchanan | Mar 1992 | A |
5097833 | Campos | Mar 1992 | A |
5097843 | Soukup et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101814 | Palti | Apr 1992 | A |
5107834 | Ideker et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5111814 | Goldfarb | May 1992 | A |
5111815 | Mower | May 1992 | A |
5129394 | Mehra | Jul 1992 | A |
5133354 | Kallok | Jul 1992 | A |
5137021 | Wayne et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144554 | Zhang et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5154501 | Svenson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156147 | Warren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156149 | Hudrlik | Oct 1992 | A |
5161527 | Nappholz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163427 | Keimel | Nov 1992 | A |
5163428 | Pless | Nov 1992 | A |
5172690 | Nappholz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172699 | Svenson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174286 | Chirife | Dec 1992 | A |
5184616 | Weiss | Feb 1993 | A |
5184620 | Cudahy et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185620 | Cooper | Feb 1993 | A |
5188104 | Wernicke et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188106 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190036 | Linder | Mar 1993 | A |
5190041 | Palti | Mar 1993 | A |
5190141 | Boldrini et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205284 | Freeman | Apr 1993 | A |
5213098 | Bennett et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231381 | Duwaer | Jul 1993 | A |
5231988 | Wernicke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5233985 | Hudrlik | Aug 1993 | A |
5236413 | Feiring | Aug 1993 | A |
5243980 | Mehra et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5267560 | Cohen | Dec 1993 | A |
5281219 | Kallok | Jan 1994 | A |
5282785 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284491 | Sutton et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286254 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292344 | Douglas | Mar 1994 | A |
5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
5318591 | Causey, III et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320543 | Barton | Jun 1994 | A |
5320642 | Scherlag et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320643 | Roline et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324327 | Cohen | Jun 1994 | A |
5325856 | Nitzsche et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327887 | Nowakowski | Jul 1994 | A |
5346506 | Mower et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350403 | Stroetmann et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353800 | Pohndorf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365461 | Stein et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366485 | Kroll et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366486 | Zipes et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368040 | Carney | Nov 1994 | A |
5370665 | Hudrlik | Dec 1994 | A |
5374787 | Miller et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381160 | Landmeier | Jan 1995 | A |
5386835 | Elphick et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5386837 | Sterzer | Feb 1995 | A |
5387419 | Levy et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391192 | Lu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
5397344 | Garfield et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398683 | Edwards et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402151 | Duwaer | Mar 1995 | A |
5411531 | Hill et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415629 | Henley | May 1995 | A |
5417717 | Salo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419763 | Hildebrand | May 1995 | A |
5423872 | Cigaina | Jun 1995 | A |
5425363 | Wang | Jun 1995 | A |
5431682 | Hedberg | Jul 1995 | A |
5431688 | Freeman | Jul 1995 | A |
5431693 | Schroeppel | Jul 1995 | A |
5433730 | Alt | Jul 1995 | A |
5443485 | Housworth et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443489 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1995 | A |
5445609 | Lattin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447520 | Spano et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447525 | Powell et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447526 | Karsdon | Sep 1995 | A |
5458568 | Racchini et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464020 | Lerner | Nov 1995 | A |
5464429 | Hedberg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468254 | Hahn et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472453 | Alt | Dec 1995 | A |
5476484 | Hedberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5476485 | Weinberg et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476487 | Sholder | Dec 1995 | A |
5476497 | Mower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482052 | Lerner | Jan 1996 | A |
5489293 | Pless et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495077 | Miller et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499971 | Shapland et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501662 | Hofmann | Mar 1996 | A |
5505700 | Leone et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510813 | Makinwa et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514162 | Bornzin et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520642 | Bigagli et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522853 | Kroll | Jun 1996 | A |
5527345 | Infinger | Jun 1996 | A |
5528002 | Katabami | Jun 1996 | A |
5531764 | Adams et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534015 | Kroll et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540722 | Clare et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540730 | Terry et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540734 | Zabara | Jul 1996 | A |
5543588 | Bisset et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543589 | Buchana et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549646 | Katz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556421 | Prutchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556760 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558640 | Pfeiler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561165 | Lautt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562708 | Combs et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565632 | Ogawa | Oct 1996 | A |
5568809 | Ben-Haim | Oct 1996 | A |
5571143 | Hoegnelid et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571997 | Gray et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578061 | Stroetmann et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584804 | Klatz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584868 | Salo et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587200 | Lorenz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589856 | Stein et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601609 | Duncan | Feb 1997 | A |
5601611 | Fayram et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620468 | Mongeon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622687 | Krishnan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626622 | Cooper | May 1997 | A |
5632267 | Hognelid et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634895 | Igo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649966 | Noren et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651378 | Matheny et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654030 | Munshi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662687 | Hedberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670755 | Kwon | Sep 1997 | A |
5674251 | Combs et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674259 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5683429 | Mehra | Nov 1997 | A |
5683431 | Wang | Nov 1997 | A |
5687734 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690691 | Chen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697953 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713924 | Min et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713929 | Hess et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713935 | Prutchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720768 | Verboven-Nelissen | Feb 1998 | A |
5735876 | Kroll et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738096 | Ben-Haim | Apr 1998 | A |
5738105 | Kroll | Apr 1998 | A |
5741211 | Renirie et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741791 | Olsen | Apr 1998 | A |
5749906 | Kieval et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755740 | Nappholz | May 1998 | A |
5777607 | Koolen | Jul 1998 | A |
5779661 | Stephen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782876 | Flammang | Jul 1998 | A |
5782881 | Lu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783951 | Inoue et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790106 | Hirano et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790107 | Kasser et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792189 | Gray et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792198 | Nappholz | Aug 1998 | A |
5792208 | Gray | Aug 1998 | A |
5797967 | KenKnight | Aug 1998 | A |
5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5807234 | Bui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807306 | Shapland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814079 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5824016 | Ekwall | Oct 1998 | A |
5825352 | Bisset et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841078 | Miller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844506 | Binstead | Dec 1998 | A |
5854881 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861014 | Familoni | Jan 1999 | A |
5861583 | Schediwy et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
5906607 | Taylor et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911223 | Weaver et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913876 | Taylor et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914465 | Allen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919216 | Houben et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920309 | Bisset et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927284 | Borst et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954761 | Machek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956020 | D—Amico et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962246 | Ladner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991649 | Garfield et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995872 | Bourgeois | Nov 1999 | A |
6002594 | Ledin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006134 | Hill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023640 | Ross | Feb 2000 | A |
6026326 | Bardy | Feb 2000 | A |
6032074 | Collins | Feb 2000 | A |
6032672 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
6037882 | Levy | Mar 2000 | A |
6041252 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057374 | Huntington et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066163 | John | May 2000 | A |
6067470 | Mower | May 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075520 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083249 | Familoni | Jul 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093167 | Houben et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122536 | Sun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128007 | Seybold et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133906 | Geaghan | Oct 2000 | A |
6135978 | Houben et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136019 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6141586 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6141587 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6151586 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6178351 | Mower | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6233484 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233487 | Mika et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236887 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239389 | Allen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243607 | Mintchev et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261280 | Houben et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278443 | Amro et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285906 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292693 | Darvish et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292704 | Malonek et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295470 | Mower | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296693 | McCarthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298254 | Tamada | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6298268 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317631 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330476 | Ben-Haim et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337995 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341235 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343232 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363279 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381495 | Jenkins | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392636 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411847 | Mower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415178 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417846 | Lee | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424864 | Matsuura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433069 | Oeltjen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449511 | Mintchev et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452514 | Philipp | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453199 | Kobozev | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463323 | Conrad-Vlasak | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463324 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469719 | Kino et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504530 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505745 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507093 | Kaneda et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6555235 | Aufderheide et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
6558345 | Houben et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567700 | Turcott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570557 | Westerman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571127 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572542 | Houben et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583676 | Krah et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587093 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587721 | Prutchi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600953 | Flesler et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605039 | Houben et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611258 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612983 | Marschal | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630123 | Woltering et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633280 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634895 | Agro et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652444 | Ross | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658297 | Loeb | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667740 | Ely et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684104 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690156 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762752 | Perski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781577 | Shigetaka | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810286 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6853862 | Marchal et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6875605 | Ma | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6919205 | Brighton | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949081 | Chance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7006871 | Darvish et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7027863 | Prutchi et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7062318 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076306 | Marchal et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092753 | Darvish et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7167748 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171263 | Darvish et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190997 | Darvish et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7440806 | Whitehurst et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7460907 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7840262 | Mika et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020010492 | Donovan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026141 | Houben et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052632 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020081732 | Bowlin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123771 | Ideker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161414 | Flesler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183686 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018367 | DiLorenzo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028221 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040777 | Shemer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055464 | Darvish et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055465 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055466 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100889 | Duverger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030167476 | Conklin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181958 | Doubak | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188899 | Chao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208242 | Harel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030211475 | Roberts | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040059393 | Policker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040095333 | Morag et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105040 | Oh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106954 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155871 | Perski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158289 | Girouard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162595 | Foley | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040230273 | Cates et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243190 | Ben-Haim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249421 | Harel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021101 | Chen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033396 | Ospyka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065553 | Ben Ezra et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095227 | Rosenzweig et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050192542 | Dev et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060036126 | Ross et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079475 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085045 | Harel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060184207 | Darvish et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070016262 | Gross et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027487 | Mika et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027490 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060812 | Harel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088393 | Ben-Haim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070156177 | Harel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161851 | Takizawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171211 | Perski et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070239216 | Shemer et al. | Oct 2007 | A9 |
20070293901 | Rousso et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058879 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065159 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065163 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065164 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140142 | Darvish et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090062893 | Spehr et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090131993 | Rousso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090292324 | Rousso et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100016923 | Rousso et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035963 | Chajut et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20130096639 | Ben-Haim et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130338425 | Rousso et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0156593 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0220916 | May 1987 | EP |
0250931 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0314078 | May 1989 | EP |
0481684 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0503839 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0528751 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0727241 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0910429 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1263498 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1394171 | May 1975 | GB |
2280377 | Feb 1995 | GB |
62-112530 | May 1987 | JP |
62-275471 | Nov 1987 | JP |
04-117967 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-282168 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-365493 | Dec 1992 | JP |
06-169998 | Jun 1994 | JP |
06-506619 | Jul 1994 | JP |
07-503865 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07-126600 | May 1995 | JP |
07-144024 | Jun 1995 | JP |
08-243176 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2014844 | Jun 1994 | RU |
2055606 | Mar 1996 | RU |
2075980 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2077273 | Apr 1997 | RU |
2078547 | May 1997 | RU |
WO 9119534 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9200716 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9213592 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9302743 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9302745 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9308874 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9318820 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9417855 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9502995 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9508316 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9610358 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9616696 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9706849 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9715227 | May 1997 | WO |
9725098 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9724981 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9725098 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9725101 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9729679 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9810828 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810829 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810830 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810831 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810832 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9819719 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9903533 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9906105 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9909971 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0001443 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004947 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0012525 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0016741 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0027475 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0042914 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0053257 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0074773 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0124871 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0149367 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0152931 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0166183 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0191854 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0193950 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0193951 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0210791 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 02053093 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02082968 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03045493 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004021858 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059393 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004070396 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080533 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005023081 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005087310 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005114369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006073671 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006087717 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006097934 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006097935 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119467 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007091255 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
R. Miledi et al. “Effects of membrane polarization on sarcoplasmic calcium release in skeletal muscle”; Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biological Science, Sep. 17, 1981; 213 (1190):1-13 (abstract). |
“The Latest Tetralogy of Fallot Discussion with Graphical Support Including Video of Echocardiography and Catherization”, Pediatric Electrophysiologyicu Book (“An On-Line Resource for Pediatric Critical Care”). |
Adeghate et al., “Effect of Electrical Field Stimulation on Insulin and Glucagon Secretion from the Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, Hormone and Metabolic Research, 33, abst. only. |
Antman et al. “Treatment of 150 Cases of Life-Threatening Digitals Intoxication with Digoxin-Specific Fab Antibody Fragments”, Circulation, 81(6): 1744-1752, 1990. |
Antoni et al. “Polarization Effects of Sinusoidal 50-Cycle Alternating Current on Membrane Potential of Mammalian Cardiac Fibres”, Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 314(4): 274-291, 1970. |
Bach “Tach Arrhythmia Detection, Implantable Cardloverter Defibrilator Therapy: The Engineering—Clinical Interface”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (15): 303-323, 1997. |
Bakker et al. “Beneficial Effects of Biventricular Pacing of Congestive Heart Failure”, Pace, 17(Part II): 318, 1994. |
Bakker et al. “Biventricular Pacing Improves Functional Capacity in Patients with End-Stage Congestive Heart Failure”, Pace, 17(11/Part II/120): 825, 1995. |
Bargheer et al. “Prolongation of Monophastic Action Potential Duration and the Refractory Period in the Human Heart by Tedisamil, A New Potassium-Blocking Agent”, The European Society of Cardiology, 15(10): 1409-1414, 1994. |
Bergsten et al. “Synchronous Oscillations of Cytoplasmic Ca2+ and Insulin Release in Glucose-Stimulated Pancreatic Islets”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269(12): 8749-8753, 1994. |
Borst et al. “Coronary Artery Bypass Grating Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass and without Interuption of Native Coronary Flow Using a Novel Anastomosis Site Restraining Device (Octupus)”, Journal of the American Colleges of Cardiology, 27(6): 1356-1364, 1996. |
Bouaziz et al. “Direct Electrical Stimulation of Insulin Secretion by Intact Murine Islets of Langerbans Through the Culture Support”, Electro-and Magnetobiology, 17(2), 1998, abst. only. |
Bronzino “Biomedical Engineering Handbook”, IEEE Press/CRC Press, 5(Chap.82): 1288, 1995. |
Brumwell et al. “The Amplifier Sensing the Depolarization Implantable Cardioverter Dafibrillator Therapy: The Engineering-Clinical Interface”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chap.14: 275-302, 1997. |
Burfeind et al. “The Effects of Mechanical Cardiac Stabilization on Left Ventricular Performance”, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery,14: 285-289, 1998. |
Cano et al. “Dose-Dependent Reversal of Dixogin-Inhibited Activity of An In-Vitro Na+K+ATPase Model by Digoxin-Specific Antibody”, Toxicology Letters, 85(2): 107-1011, 1996. |
Cazeau et al. “Multisite Pacing for End-Stage Heart Failure: Early Experience”, PACE, 19(Part II): 1748-1757, 1996. |
Cheng et al. “Calcium Sparks: Elementary Events Underlying Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Heart Muscle”, Science, 262: 740-744, 1993. |
Cooper “Postextrasystolic Potentiation: Do We Really Know What it Means and How to Use it?”, Ciculation , 88(6): 2962-2971, 1993. |
Coulton et al. “Magnetic Fields and Intracellular Calcium: Effects on Lymphocytes Exposed to Conditions for ‘Cyclotron Resonance’”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 38, 1993. abst. only. |
Davis et al. “Insulin, Oral Hypoglycemic Agents and the Pharmacology of the Endocrine Pancreas”, The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Chap.60: 1487-1499, 1507-1510. |
Devedeux et al. “Uterine Electromyography: A Critical Review”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169(6): 1636-53, 1993, pp. 1653 missing. |
Dillion “Optical Recoding in the Rabbit Heart Show that Defibrillation Strenght Shocks Prolong the Duration of Depolarization and the Refractory Period”, Circulation Research, 69: 842-856, 1991. |
Dillon “Synchronized Repolarization After Defibrillation Shocks. A Possible Component of the Defibrillation Process Demonstration by Optical Recordings in Rabbit Heart”, Circulation, 85(5): 1865-1878, 1992. |
Erol-Yilmaz et al. “Reversed Remodelling of Dilated Left Sided Cardiomyopathy After Upgrading From VVIR to VVIR Biventricular Pacing”, Europace, 4: 445-449, 2002. |
Gill et al. “Refractory Period Extension During Ventricular Pacing at Fibrillatory Pacing Rates”, PACE, 20(Part 1): 647-653, 1997. |
Gilmour Jr. et al. “Dynamics of Circus Movement Re-Entry Across Canine Purkinje Fibre-Muscle Junctions”, The Journal of Physiology, 476(3): 473-485, 1994. |
Gilmour Jr. et al. “Overdrive Suppression of Conduction at the Canine Purkinje-Muscle Junction”, Circulation, 76(6): 1388-1396, 1987. |
Gold et al. “Evidence that Glucose “Marks” β Cells Resulting in Preferential Release of Newly Synthesized Insulin”, Science, 218, 1982, abst. only. |
Gomis et al. “Oscillatory Patterns of Electrical Activity in Mouse Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans Recorded in Vivo”, Pflügers Archiv—European Journal of Physiology, 432(3): 510-515, 1996. |
Gussoni et al. “Dystrophin Expression in the MDX Mouse Restored by Stem Cell Transplantation”, Nature, 401(6751): 390-394, 1999. |
Harn et al. “Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Fuzzy Artmap”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43(4): 425-429, 1996, Astract. |
Hardage et al. “Anti-Tachycardla Pacing and Cardioversion”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (6): 325-342, 1997. |
Hinke et al. “Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPIV/CD26) Degradation of Glucagon, Characterization of Glucagon Degradation Products adn DPIV-Resistant analogs”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(6):3827-3834, 2000. |
Hoffman et al. “Effects of Postextrasystolic Potentiation on Normal and Failing Hearts”, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 41(5): 498-534, 1965. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. I. Insulin and Glucagon Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Vagus Nerves”, Acta Physiologica, 111(1), 1981. Abstract, p. 5, r-h Col., Last Line—P.6, 1-h Col., First Line, astract only. |
Horner et al. “Electrode for Recording Direction of Activation, Conduction Velocity, and Monophasic Action Potential of Myocardium”, American Journal of Physiology, 272: H1917-H1927, 1997. |
Jaremko et al. “Advances Toward the Implantable Artificial Pancreas for Treatment in Diabetes”, Diabetes Care, 21(3):444-450, 1998. |
Josephson “Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpertations Third Edition”, Cardiology Book from C.H.I.P.S., only front page. |
King et al. “The Inotropic Action of Paired Pulse Stimulation in the Normal and Falling Heart: An Experimental Study”, Cardiovascular Research, 2: 122-129, 1968. |
Kinslet et al. “Effect of Field Stimulation on Cellular Repolarization in Rabbit Myocardium Implications for Reentry Induction”, Circulation Research, 70: 707-715, 1991. |
Koller et al. “Relation Between Repolarization and Refractoriness During Programmed Electrical Stimulation in the Human Right Ventricle”, Circulation, 91: 2378-2384, 1995. |
Kurose et al. “Glucagon, Insulin and Somatostatin Secretion in Response to Sympathetic Neural Activation in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. A Study with the Isolated Perfused Rat Pancreas in Vitro”, Diabetologia, 35:1035-1041, 1992. |
Lindström et al. “Intracellular Calcium Oscillations in A T-Cell Line After Exposure to Extremely-Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields with Variable Frequencies and Flux Densities”, Bioelectromagnetics, 16, 1995, abst. only. |
Liu et al. “2-Pyridylthioureas: Novel Nonpeptides Somatostatin Agonists with SST4 Selectivity”, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 5(4):255-263, 1999. |
Loginov “Accumulation of Calcium Ions in Myocardial Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of Restrained Rats Exposed to the Pulsed Electromagnetic Field”, Aviakosm Ekolog Med, 26(2), 1992, abst. only. |
Loginov et al. “Effects of an Impulse Electromagnetic Field on Calcium Ion Accumulation in the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of the Rat Myocardium”, Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med, 25(5), 1991, abst. only. |
Lubart et al. “Effect of Light on Calcium Transport in Bull Sperm Cells”, J. Photochemical Photobiology, 15(4): 337-341, 1992. |
Luiken et al. “Contraction-Induced Fatty Acid Translocase/CD36 Translocation in Rat Cardiac Myocytes is Mediated Through AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling”, Diabetes, 52: 1627-1634, 2003. |
Magnus et al. “Model of β-Cell Mitochondrial Calcium Handling and Electrical Activity. II. Mitochondrial Variables”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Cell Physiology, 274(43): C1174-1184, 1998. |
Matheny et al. “Vagus Nerve Stimulations as a Method to Temporarily Slow or Arrest the Heart”, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 63(6): S28-29, 1997. Abstract. |
McVeigh et al. “Noninvasive Measurement of Transmural Gradients in Myocardial Strain with MR Imaging”, Radiology, 180(3): 677-684, 1991. |
Mercando et al. “Automated Detection of Tachycardias by Antitachycardia Devices”, Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, Chap.100: 943-948, 2004. |
Merck “The Merck Manual”, 16th Ed, Section 3, 1992, subsection 25 of section 3 only. |
Meurer et al. “Properties of Native and In Vitro Glycosylated Forms of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-I Receptor Antagonist Exendin(9-39)”, Metabolism, 48(6), 1999. abst. only. |
Misler et al. “Electrophysiology of Stimulus-Secretion Coupling in Human b-Cells”, Diabetes, 41, 1999, abst. only. |
Moran et al. “Digoxin-Specific Fab Fragments Impair Renal Function in the Rat”, Journal if Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 46(10): 854-856, 1994. |
Morse et al. “A Guide to Cardiac Pacemakers, Defibrillators and Related Products”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 15(4), 1992, Abstract. |
Nadal et al. “Homologous and Heterologous Asynchronicity Between Identified α-, β- and δ-Cells Within Intact Islets of Langerhans in the Mouse”, Journal of Physiology, 517 (Pt. 1): 85-93, 1999. Abstract. |
Nannini et al. “Muscle Recruitment with Intrafascicular Electrodes”, IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering, 38: 769-776, 1991. |
Ohinata et al. “Proadrenomedullin N-Terminal 20 Peptide (PAMP) Elevates Blood Glucose Levels Via Bombesin Receptor in Mice”, FEBS Letters, 473(2), 2000, only 1 page submitted. |
Palti et al. “Islets of Langerhans Generate Wavelike Electric Activity Modulated by Glucose Concentration”, Diabetes, 45, 1996, only 1 page. |
Park et al. “Significant Cholinergie Role in Secreted-Stimulated Exocrine Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreas”, American Journal of Physiology, 274(2):413-418, 1998. |
Patterson et al. “Therapeutic Angiogenesis—The New Electrophysiology?”, Circulation, 99(20): 2614-2616, 1999. |
Paul et al. “Automatic Recognition of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Temporal Electrogram Analysis”, PACE, 14: 1265-1273, 1991. |
Pokrovsky et al. “Pysiology of Man”, Moscow Medicine, Translation of Extracts, 1997, only p. 82-83, 82-154 provided. |
Pørksen et al. “Pulsatile Insulin Secretion: Detection, Regulation and Role in Diabetes, Section 6: Pulsatile and Phasic Insulin Release in Normal and Diabetic Men”,Diabetes, 51(Suppl. 1/Sec.6): S245-S254, 2002. |
Ranjan et al. “Electrical Stimulation of Cardiac Myocytes”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 23(6): 812-821, 1995. Abstract. |
Rivera et al. “Regulation of Protein Secretion Through Controlled Aggregation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum”,Science, 287, 2000, abst only. |
Saihara “Summation of Excitation with a Single Conditioning Stimulus in the Canine Heart”, PACE, 13: 52-58, 1990. |
Saksena et al. “Prevention of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation with Chronic Dual-Site Atrial Pacing”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, JACC, 28(3): 687-694, 1996. Abstract. |
Sakurma et al. “A Model Analysis of Aftereffects of High-Intensity DC Stimulation on Action Potential of Ventricular Muscle”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45(2): 258-267, 1998, pp. 260, 262, 264, 266 missing. |
Saveliev et al. “Guidebook on Clinical Endoscopy”, Moscow Medicine, p. 21, 35, 1985. |
Schirra et al. “Exendin (9-39) Amide is An Antagonist of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1(7-36) Amide in Humans”, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 101(7): 1421-1430, 1998. |
Schirra et al. “Mechanisms if the Antidiabetic Action of Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptide-1(7-36)Amide in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus”, Journal of Endocrinology, 156, 1998, only 1 page. |
Schwartz et al. “Exposure of Frog Hearts to CW or Amplitude-Modified VHF Fields: Selective Efflux of Calcium Ions at 16 Hz”, Bioelectromagnetics, 11(4): 349-358, 1990, Abstract only. |
Serre et al. “Exedin-(9-39) is Au Inverse Agonist of the Murine Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor” Implacations for Basal Intracellular Cyclic Adenosine 3′, 5′-Monophosphate Levels and B-Cell Glucose Competence, Endocrinology, 139(11): 4448-4454, 1998. |
Shah et al. “Impact of Lack of Suppression of Glucagon on Glucose Tolerancein Humans”, American Journal of Physiology, 277:E283-E290, 1999. |
Shmit et al. “Physiology of Man”, Moscow Mir, 1:78, Translation of Extract, 1996. |
Shubs et al. “Physiology if Vessel Smooth Muscles”,Kiev Naukova Dumka, 142:11-15, 1988. |
Shumaik et al. “Oleander Poisoning: Treatment with Digoxin-Specific Fab Antibody Fragments”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 17(7): 732-735, 1988. |
Singh et al. “Effects of Islet Hormones on Nerve-Mediated and Acetylcholine-Evokedsecretory Responses in the Isolated Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 1(3), 1998, only abst. |
Skale et al. “Inhibition of Premature Ventricular Extranstimuli by Subthreshold Conditioning Stimuli”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 6(1): 133-140, 1985. |
Solomonow et al. “Control of Muscle Contractile Force Through Indirect High-Frequency Stimulation”, American Journal of Physical Medicine, 67(2): 71-82, 1983, Abstract. |
Soria et al. “Cytosolic Calcium Oscillations and Insulin Release in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans”, Diabetes & Metabolism, 24(1): 37-40, 1998. |
Stevenson et al. “Electrophysiological Characteristics of Ventricular Tachycardia of Fibrillation in Relation to Age of Myocardial infarction”, Am J. Cardiol. 57(6). |
Supino “The System”, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy: The Engineering-Clinical Interface, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chap.8: 163-172, 1997. |
Sweeney et al. “Refractory Interval After Transcardiac Shocks During Ventricular Fibrillation”, Circulation, 94: 2947-2952, 1996. |
Sweeney et al. “Ventricular Refractory Period Extension Caused by Defibrillation Shocks”, Circulation, 82: 965-972, 1990. |
Sweeney et al. “Countershock Strength-Duration Relationship for Myocardial Refractory Period Extension”, Academy of Emergency Medicine, 2: 57-92, 1995. |
Swerdlow et al. “Cardiovascular Collapse Caused by Electrocardiographically Silent 60-Hz Intracardiac Leakage Current: Implications for Electrical Safety”, Circulation, 99: 2559-2564, 1999. |
Talit et al. “The Effect of External Cardiac Pacing on Stroke Volume”, PACE, 13: 598-602, 1990. |
Taniguchi et al. “Inhomogencity of Cellular Activation Time and VMax in Normal Myocardial Tissue Under Electrical Field Stimulation”, American Journal of Physiology, 267: H694-H705, 1994, p. 694-696, 700, 702-703, unreadable. |
Thakor et al. “Effect of Varying Pacing Waveform Shapes on Propagation and Hemodynamics in the Rabbit Heart”, American Journal of Cardiology, 79(6A): 36-43, 1997, p. 37 missing. |
Todd et al. “Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptide-I Improve Postprandial Glycaemic Control Over a 3-Week Period in Patients with Early Type 2 Diabetes”, Clinical Science, 95: 325-329, 1998. |
Tsong “Electroporation of Cell Membranes”, Biophysical Journal, 60: 297-306, 1991. |
Valdeolmillos et al. “In Vitro Synchronous Membrane Potential Oscillations in Mouse Pancreatic B-Cells: Lack of Co-Ordination Between Islets”, Journal of Physiology, 493(1): 9-18, 1996. |
Van Ripper et al. “Electrical Field Stimulation, Mediated Relaxation of a Rabbit Middle Celebral Artery”, Circulation Research, 70: 1104-1112, 1992. |
Verrier et al. “Electrophysiologic Basis for T Wave Alternans as an Index of Vulnerability to Ventricular Fibrillation”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 5(5): 445-461, 1994, Abstract. |
Wang et al. “Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Tonally Inhibits β-, α-, and Cell Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreatic Islets”, American Journal of Physiology, 276:E19-E24, 1999. |
Webster Design of Cardiac Pacemakers, IEEE Press, p. xi-xiii, 1995. |
Wessale et al. “Stroke Volume and the Three Phase Cardiac Output Rate Relationship with Ventricular Pacing”, PACE, 13: 673-680, 1990. |
Windle et al. “Subthreshold Conditioning Stimuli Prolong Human Ventricular Refractoriness”, The American Journal of Cardiology, 57(6): 381-386, 1996. Abstract. |
Wirtzfeld et al. “Physiological Pacing: Present Status and Future Developments”, PACE, 10(Pt.I): 41-57, 1987. |
Xue et al. “Neural-Network-Based Adaptive Matohed Filtering for QRS Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39(4): 317-329, 1992, Abstract. |
Yokoyama “The Phase of Supernormal Excitation in Relation to the Strength of Subthreshold Stimuli”, Japanese Heart Journal, 17(3): 315-325, 1975. |
Zhou et al. “Preventions of Action Potentials During Extracellular Electrical Stimulation of Long Duration”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 8(7): 779-789, 1997. Abstract. |
Zipes et al. “Cardiac Electrophysiology—From Cell to Bedside”, Saunders Co., 4th Ed., 1990. |
Examination Report Dated Jun. 26, 2009 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 1161/CHENP/2006. |
Office Action Dated Jul. 13, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480027083.3 and Its Translation Into English. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 2, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 4, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 14, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 25, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 28, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 28, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—IDS Dated May 31, 2006. |
Response Dated Nov. 22, 2009 to Official Action of Jun. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Gardner “Natriuretic Peptides: Markers or Modulators of Cardiac Hypertrophy?”, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 14(9): 411-416, Nov. 2003. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 31, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Response Dated Aug. 10, 2011 to Official Action of May 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Response Dated Jul. 27, 2011 to Official Action of Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 9, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Dated Aug. 9, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Response Dated Aug. 31, 2011 to Official Action of Mar. 31, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Response Dated Aug. 24, 2010 to the Supplementary European Search Report of Jun. 7, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 04770468.9. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 14, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Jun. 1, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Response Dated May 15, 2011 to Office Action of Nov. 25, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. & Claims in English. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Apr. 20, 2011 From the State intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated Oct. 13, 2010 to Official Action of Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688, filed Jun. 15, 2007, Ben-Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689, Ben Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707, filed Jun. 7, 2007, Ben Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032, Ben Haim. |
Amended Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631 Dated Aug. 20, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Mar. 2, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 27, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 28, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 03794043.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 29, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04106247.2. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC Dated Mar. 2, 2007 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929478.2. |
Communication to Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Mar. 4, 2009 From the European Search Report Re.: Application No. 06759102.4. |
Inter Partes Reexamination Communication of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476 Dated Sep. 4, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Dec. 1, 2004 From the International Preliminary Examining Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL03/00736. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Nov. 15, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/US2006/017281. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Jun. 21, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. Jun. 21, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Sep. 27, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/IL2006/000345. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Aug. 30, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/IL2006/000204. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated May 12, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/US05/44557. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated Oct. 16, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/US06/17281. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated Sep. 29, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL06/00204. |
International Search Report Dated Sep. 13, 2004 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL03/00736. |
Invitation Pursuant to Rule 62a(1) EPC and Rule 63(1) EPC Dated May 5, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04719312.3. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Sep. 7, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Notification of Reasons of Rejection Dated Sep. 29, 2008 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2004-534013 and its Translation into English. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 4, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 7, 2008 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Jan. 8, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated May 8, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 12, 2004 From the Israeli Patent Office Re.: Application No. 128955. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 15, 2008 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated May 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 5, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 8, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 9, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Date Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 11, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 12, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 13, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 14, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 15, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 16, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 17, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 18, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 18, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 19, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 19, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 21, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 23, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 26, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,794. |
Official Action Dated May 26, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 27, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,794. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 31, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279—IDS Submitted Dec. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279—Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate Dated Mar. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279—Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279—Order Granting Request Dated Nov. 5, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279 Dated Jun. 8, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,279, Response to Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008 Submitted Aug. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887—IDS Submitted Oct. 17, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887—Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Examination Certificate Dated Mar. 19, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887—Official Action and IDS Considered Dated Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887—Official Action Granting Request for Ex Parte Examination Dated Aug. 17, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887 Dated Jun. 13, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,268—Certificate of Reexamination Issued Mar. 7, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,268—IDS Considered Feb. 22, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,268—Notice of Intent to Issue Certificate of Reexamination Dated Mar. 29, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,268 Dated Oct. 10, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,268 Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Dated Dec. 19, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—Amendment in Response to Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008, filed Aug. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Sep. 26, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Dec. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—Notice of Intent to issue Certificate of Reexamination Dated Mar. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—Order Granting Reexamination Dated Nov. 5, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Jun. 8, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—Comments by 3rd Party Requestor, Response Thereto and Official Action Issued Jul. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—Communication of Right to Appeal dated Jul. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—IDS Filed May 4, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—Official Action by USPTO Issued Mar. 23, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476—Order Granting Request for Reexamination Dated Mar. 23, 2004 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,476 Dated Dec. 31, 2003 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324—Amendment in Response to Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007, filed Oct. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324—Certificate of Reexamination Dated Apr. 29, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action—Notice of Intent to Reexamine Dated Jan. 24, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action, Interview Summary and References Considered Dated Nov. 6, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,463,324 Dated Nov. 1, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Response Dated Jul. 1, 2010 to Invitation Pursuant to Rule 62a(1) EPC and Rule 63(1) EPC of May 5, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04719312.3. |
Response Dated Mar. 1, 2010 to Official Action of Aug. 28, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Response Dated Oct. 1, 2007 to Official Action of Aug. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Response Dated Sep. 1, 2004 to Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC of Mar. 2, 2004 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929478.2. |
Response Dated Feb. 2, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 2, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Response Dated Apr. 3, 2008 to Official Action of Jan. 3, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Response Dated Mar. 3, 2010 to Official Action of Sep. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated May 3, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Response Dated Feb. 4, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 4, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Response Dated Mar. 4, 2010 to Official Action of Nov. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Response Dated May 4, 2009 to Official Action of Nov. 3, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Response Dated May 4, 2010 to Official Action of Jan. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Response Dated Oct. 4, 2007 to Official Action of Sep. 4, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Response Dated Jan. 5, 2010 to Official Action of Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Response Dated Apr. 6, 2010 to Official Action of Oct. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Response Dated May 6, 2010 to Office Action Dated Jan. 8, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
Response Dated Feb. 7, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 2, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Response Dated Feb. 7, 2010 to Official Action of Nov. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Response Dated May 7, 2007 to Examination Report of Mar. 2, 2007 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 533/CHENP/2005. |
Response Dated Feb. 8, 2010 to Official Action Dated Oct. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Feb. 9, 2010 to Official Action of Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Response Dated Mar. 15, 2010 to Official Action of Sep. 14, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Response Dated Jan. 17, 2008 to Official Action of Jul. 18, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Response Dated Feb. 18, 2010 to Official Action of Aug. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Response Dated Apr. 20, 2006 to Communication Pursuant of Article 96(2) EPC of Nov. 2, 2005 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929478.2. |
Response Dated Aug. 20, 2008 to Official Action of Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Response Dated May 21, 2008 to Office Action of Dec. 11, 2007 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 09-525055. |
Response Dated Dec. 24, 2006 to Office Action of Jul. 18, 2006 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 10-513446. |
Response Dated Dec. 25, 2006 to Notice of Reasons for Rejection of Jul. 18, 2006 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 09-529637. |
Response Dated Jan. 25, 2007 to Examination Report of Jul. 7, 2006 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 533/CHENP/2005. |
Response Dated Mar. 25, 2010 to Official Action of Sep. 25, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Response Dated Oct. 5, 2010 to Official Action of May 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC Dated Dec. 22, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929480.8. |
Supplementary European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Nov. 28, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Jun. 7, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04770468.9. |
Supplementary Notice of Allowability Dated Nov. 22, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Translation of Decision of Rejection Dated Apr. 22, 2009 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2004-534013. |
Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection Dated Jul. 18, 2006 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 9-529637. |
Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection Dated Apr. 27, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2007-206282. |
Translation of Notification of Reasons of Rejection Dated Apr. 12, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-525265. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Sep. 12, 2008 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480032636.9. |
Blank et al. “Initial Interactions in Electromagnetic Field-Induced Biosynthesis”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, 199: 359-363, 2004. |
Highfill et al. “Large-Scale Production of Murine Bone Marrow Cells in an Airlift Packed Bed Bioreactor”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 50(5): 514-520, 1996. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. II. The Effect of Pharmacological Blocking Agents on the Response to Vagal Stimulation”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 9-14, 1981. Abstract. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 20, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Response Dated Dec. 14, 2011 to Official Action of Sep. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Official Action Dated May 12, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 21, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report Dated Nov. 4, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04719312.3. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 4, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
Response Dated Dec. 8, 2011 to Official Action of Aug. 9, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Response Dated Dec. 27, 2011 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC of Aug. 26, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 06759102.4. |
Response Dated Apr. 10, 2011 to Official Action of Jan. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
USPTO Public Print Out of Interference File Content of Interference Dated Apr. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. Interference No. 105,765. |
USPTO Public Print Out of Interference File Content of Interference Dated Apr. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. Interference No. 105,768. |
Response Dated Sep. 30, 2010 to Official Action of Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
San Mauro et al. “Nerves of the Heart: A Comprehensive Review With a Clinical Point of View”, Neuroanatomy, 8: 28-31, 2009. |
Response Dated Aug. 1, 2010 to Notification of Reasons of Rejection of Apr. 12, 2010 from the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-525265. |
Response Dated Aug. 2, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Jul. 26, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 25, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated Aug. 1, 2011 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment of Jul. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Aug. 3, 2011 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Examination Report Dated Nov. 30, 2010 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re. Application No. 212/MUMNP/2006. |
Office Action Dated Apr. 13, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re. Application No. 200480027293.3 and Its Translation Into English. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 15, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response dated Oct. 12, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Response Dated Dec. 13, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Response Dated Dec. 13, 2010 to Official Action of Oct. 13, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Response Dated Nov. 22, 2010 to Official Action of Jul. 21, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Response Dated Oct. 28, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Response Dated Apr. 20, 2011 to Official Action of Mar. 22, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Supplemental Response Dated Apr. 18, 2011 to Response of Apr. 10, 2011 to Official Action of Jan. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 11, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 99931435.4. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 13, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,236,887—IDS Submitted Sep. 29, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Response Dated Jun. 7, 2010 to Official Action of Jan. 6, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Response Dated Jul. 13, 2010 to Notice of Reasons for Rejection of Apr. 27, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2007-206282. |
Adeghate et al. “Effect of Electrical Field Stimulation on Insulin and Glucagon Secretion From the Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, Hormone and Metabolic Research, 33(5): 281-289, May 2001. Abstract. |
Bergsten et al. “Synchronous Oscillations of Cytoplasmic Ca2+ and Insulin Release in Glucose-Stimulated Pancreatic Islets”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269(12): 8749-8753, Mar. 25, 1994. |
Burfeind et al “The Effects of Mechanical Cardiac Stabilization on Left Ventricular Performance”, Europcari Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 14: 285-289, 1998. |
Devedeux et al. “Uterine Electromyography: A Critical Review”, American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, 169(6): 1636-1653, 1993. |
Fromer et al. “Ultrarapid Subthreshold Stimulation for Termination of Atriventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia”, Journal of the American College Cardiology, 20: 879-883, 1992. |
Gold et al. “Evidence That Glucose ‘Marks’ Beta Cells Resulting in Preferential Release of Newly Synthesized Insulin”, Science, 218(4567): 56-58, Oct. 1, 1982. Abstract. |
Gomis et al. “Oscillatory Patterns of Electrical Activity in Mouse PancreaticIslets of Langerhans Recorded in Vivo”, Pfl?gers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 432(3): 510-515, 1996. |
Hinke et al. “Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPIV/CD26) Degradation of Glucagon. Characterization of Glucagon Degradation Products and DPIV-Resistant Analogs”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(6): 3827-3834, Feb. 11, 2000. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. I. Insulin and Glucagon Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Vagus Nerves”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 1-7, Jan. 1981. Abstract. |
Horner et al. “Electrode for Recording Direction of Activation, Conduction Velocity and Monophasic Action Potential of Myocardium”, American Journal of Physiology, 272(4): H1917-H1927, 1997. Abstract. |
Jaremko et al. “Advances Towards the Implantable Artifical Pancreas for Treatment of Diabetes”, Diabetes Care, 21(3): 444-450, 1998. |
Kurose et al. “Glucagon, Insulin and Somatostatin Secretion in Response to Sympathetic Neural Activation in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. A Study With the Isolated Perfused Rat Pancreas in Vitro”, Diabetologia, 35(11): 1035-1041, Nov. 1992. Abstract. |
Magnus et al. “Model of ?—Cell Mitochondrial Calcium Handling and Electrical Activity. II. Mitochondrial Variables”, American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, 274(43): C1174-C1184, 1998. |
Meurer et al. “Properties of Native and in Vitro Glycosylated Forms of the Glucogan-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Antagonist Exendin(9-39)”, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, 48(6): 716-724, Jun. 1999. Abstract. |
Misler et al. “Electrophysiology of Stimulus-Secretion Coupling in Human Beta-Cells”, Diabetes, 41(10): 1221-1228, Oct. 1992. Abstract. |
Nadal et al. “Homologous and Heterologous Asynchronicity Between Identified ?-, ?- and ?- Cells Within Intact Islets of Langerhans in the Mouse”, Journal of Physicology, 517(Pt.1): 85-93, 1999. |
Ohinata et al. “Proadrenomedullin N-Terminal 20 Peptide (PAMP) Elevates Blood Glucose Levels Via Bombesin Receptor in Mice”, FEBS Letters, 473(2): 207-211, May 2000. Abstract. |
P?rksen et al. “Section 6: Pulsatile and Phasic Insulin Release in Normal and Diabetic Man. Pulsatile Insulin Secretion: Detection, Regulation, and Role in Diabetes”, Diabetes, 51(Supp1.1): S245-S254, Feb. 2002. |
Patti et al. “Islets of Langerhans Generate Wavelike Electric Activity Modulated by Glucose Concentration”, Diabetes, 45(5): 595-601, May 1996. Abstract. |
Park et al. “Significant Cholinergic Role in Secretin-Stimulated Exocrine Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreas”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 274(2): G413-G418, Feb. 1998. |
Pokrovsky et al. “Physiology of Man”, 1: 82-83, 94, 2: 42, 54. |
Rivera et al. “Regulation of Protein Secretion Through Controlled Aggregation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum”, Science, 287(5454): 826-830, Feb. 4, 2000. Abstract. |
Schirra et al. “Exendin(9-39) Amide Is an Antagonist of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1(7-36) Amide in Humans”, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 101(7): 1421-1430, Apr. 1998. |
Schirra et al. “Mechanisms of the Antidiabetic Action of Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (17-36) Amide in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus”, Journal of Endocrinology Ltd., 156(1): 177-186, Jan. 1998. Abstract. |
Serre et al. “Exendin-(9-39) Is an Inverse Agonist of the Murine Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor: Implications for Basal Intracellular Cyclic Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate -Levels and ?-Cells Glucose Competence”, Endocrinology, 139(11): 4448-4454, 1998. |
Shah et al. “Impact of Lack of Suppression of Glucagon on Glucose Tolerance in Humans”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Endocrinology and Metabolism, 277(2 Pt.1): E283-E290, 1999. |
Shmit et al. “Physiology of Man”, Moscow Medicine, Mir, 1: 78, 1996. |
Shuba et al. “Physiology of Vessel Smooth Muscles”, Kiev Naukova Dumka, 142: 11-15, 142, 1988. |
Singh et al. “Effects of Islet Hormones on Nerve-Mediated and Acetylcholine-Evoked Secretory Responses in the Isolated Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 1(3): 627-634, Mar. 1998. Abstract. |
Soria et al. “Cytosolic Calcium Oscillations and Insulin Release in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans”, Diabetes & Metabolism, 24: 37-40, 1998. |
Valdeolmillos et al. “In Vivo Synchronous Membrane Potential Oscillations in Mouse Pancreatic Beta-Cells: Lack of Co-Ordination Between Islets”, Journal of Physiology, 493(1): 9-18, 1996. |
Van Riper et al. “Electrical Field Stimulation-Mediated Relaxation of a Rabbit Middle Cerebral Artery. Evidence of a Cholinergic Endothelium-Dependent Component”, Circulation Research, 70(6): 1104-1112, Jun. 1992. |
Wang et al. “Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Tonally Inhibits ?-, ?-, and ?- Cell Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreatic Islets”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Endocrinology and Metabolism, 276(1 Pt.1): E19-E24, 1999. |
Wright et al. “Structure of Fab hGR-2 F6, a Competitive Antagonist of the Glucagon Receptor”, Acta Crystallographica, Section D, Biological Crystallography, 56(Pt.5): 573-580, May 2000. Abstract. |
Yonemura et al. “Amelioration of Diabetes Mellitus in Partially Depancreatized Rats by Poly(ADP-Ribose) Synthetase Inhibitors. Evidence of Islet B-Cell Regeneration”, Diabetes, 33(4): 401-404, Apr. 1984. Abstract. |
Response in Conjunction With an RCE Dated Jul. 18, 2010 to Official Action Dated Feb. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Response in Conjunction With an RCE Dated Jul. 21, 2010 to Official Action of Feb. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Supplemental Response Dated Mar. 28, 2010 After an Interview of Mar. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Jul. 27, 2010 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC of Jan. 27, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Response Dated Sep. 27, 2010 to Official Action of Apr. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 8, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Response Dated Dec. 8, 2011 to Office Action of Aug. 3, 2011 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Dec. 12, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/792,811. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 18, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jan. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 3, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 24, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 29, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Response Dated Feb. 3, 2011 to Official Action of Jan. 3, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Response Dated Feb. 7, 2011 to Official Action of Oct. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Response Dated Feb. 14, 2011 to Official Action Dated Jan. 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Response Dated Jan. 31, 2011 to Official Action of Sep. 29, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Hammond et al. “Motor Innervation of the Cricopharyngeus Muscle by the Recurrent Lanryngeal Nerve”, Journal of Applied Physiology, JAP, 83: 89-94, 1997. |
Sutton et al. “The Foundation of Cardiac Pacing, Part 1: An Illustrated Practical Guide to Basic Pacing”, The Bakken Research Center Series, Chap.4: 50-59, 1991. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 22, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Response Dated Oct. 11, 2011 to Official Action of May 12, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Response Dated Aug. 26, 2010 to Official Action of May 26, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 11, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jan. 25, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 15, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Office Action Dated Jan. 18, 2012 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Examination Report Dated Feb. 20, 2013 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007. |
Kanno et al. “Establishment of a Simple and Practical Procedure Applicable to Therapeutic Angiogenesis”, Circulation, 99: 2682-2687, 1999. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 2, 2007 From the Patent Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 2004800009336.9. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 5, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 8, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 24, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Supplementary European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Nov. 28, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 006759102.4. |
Translation of the Examination Report Dated Apr. 3, 2008 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 1821/CHENP/2005. |
Applicant-initiated interview Summary Dated Nov. 28, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Applicant-initiated Interview Summary Dated Apr. 11, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Examination Report Dated Feb. 27, 2013 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 2014/CHENP/2008. |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief Dated May 9, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Butter et al. “Enhanced Inotropic State of the Failing Left Ventricle by Cardiac Contractility Modulation Electrical Signals Is Not Associated With Increased Myocardial Oxygen Consumption”, Journal of Cardiac Failure, 13(2): 137-142, 2007. |
Lawo et al. “Electrical Signals Applied During the Absolute Refractory Period. An Investigational Treatment for Advanced Heart Failure in Patients With Normal QRS Duration”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 46(12): 2229-2236, 2005. |
Neelagaru et al. “Nonexcitatory, Cardiac Contractility Modulation Electrical Impulses: Feasibility Study for Advanced Heart Failure in Patients With Normal QRS Duration”, Heart Rythm, 3(10): 1140-1147, 2006. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 15, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 16, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Official Action Dated May 29, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,775. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jun. 20, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability Dated Jul. 13, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Notice of Allowability Dated Jul. 13, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 16, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 18, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 3, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
Official Action Dated May 10, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/599,015. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jan. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 31, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 27, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 17, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 21, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief Dated Mar. 22, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part I). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part II). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part III). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part IV). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part V). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part VI). |
Bers “Excitation-Contracting Coupling”, Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, 2nd Ed., Chap.8: 203-407, 2001. (Part VII). |
Knisley et al. “Prolongation and Shortening of Action Potentials by Electrical Shocks in Frog Ventricular Muscle”, American Journal of Physiology, 266(6): H2348-H2358, 1994. |
Examination Report Dated Jan. 9, 2014 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 14, 2014 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Jun. 17, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 10, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Examination Report Dated Sep. 17, 2013 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007. |
Examination Report Dated Dec. 30, 2013 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007. |
Hearing Notice in Reference of Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007 Dated Mar. 6, 2014 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 5571/CHENP/2007. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 16, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,647. |
Babsky et al. Translation of Physiology of Man, Moscow Medicine, P.115, 348-351, 376, Extracts. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 15, 2014 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,647. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 26, 2011 From the European Patent Patent Office Re. Application No. 06759102.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 26, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 10, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 11, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated May 21, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 23, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 28, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 29, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 30, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Jul. 15, 2011 Prom the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Response Dated Jul. 27, 2011 to Official Action of Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Response Dated Jun. 29, 2011 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment of Jun. 1, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Response Dated Jul. 31, 2011 to Official Action of Apr. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Sutton et al. “What Is a Pacemaker?”, The Foundations of Cardiac Pacing, Part I: An Illustrated Practical Guide to Basic Pacing, Chap.4.5: 73-74, 1991. |
Webster “Electrodes, Leads, and Biocompatibility”, Design of Cardiac Pacemakers, IEEE Press, p. 141-144, 1995. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary Dated Dec. 11, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,647. |
Notification of Reexamination Dated Apr. 4, 2014 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re. Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030040777 A1 | Feb 2003 | US | |
20070239216 A9 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60009769 | Jan 1996 | US | |
60011117 | Feb 1996 | US | |
60026392 | Sep 1996 | US | |
60157511 | Oct 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IB00/01523 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10116201 | US | |
Parent | 09563544 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10039845 | US | |
Parent | 09101723 | US | |
Child | 09563544 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10039845 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | PCT/IB00/01523 | US |