This application claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 13161528.8, filed on Mar. 28, 2013.
The entire disclosure of European Patent Application No. 13161528.8, filed on Mar. 28, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in its entirety.
The present invention relates to the field of cash handling. More specifically, the invention relates to a module for counting and sorting a plurality of coins. The invention further provides a cash handling apparatus comprising such a module.
Retail cash systems (RCS) are used for handling of cash, such as notes (bills), cheques or coupons in a retail establishment. The systems generally comprise a coin deposit apparatus and a coin dispensing apparatus.
The coin deposit apparatus has to discriminate between different types of acceptable coins, such as valid coins in a plurality of denominations in one or more specific currencies. Preferably, it should also be capable of detecting unacceptable cash, such as fake (counterfeit) coins or coins of a foreign currency. In the coin deposit apparatus a coin acceptance module (CAM) handles the discrimination of coins and is also adapted to count the coins to register the deposited amount. One typical user is a cashier emptying a till after a work shift.
A typical CAM is disclosed in WO 2008/024043. This CAM is comprised of a hopper bowl comprising a rotary flexible disc. Coins fed into the hopper bowl are picked up by the rotary flexible disc and fed via a sorting knife to a downwardly sloping coin rail mounted to a backwardly inclined front plate of the CAM. Ideally, each coin rolls by gravity down the coin rail past a coin sensor unit for removing counterfeit coins down to a coin sorter comprising a rotary carrier disc. This carrier disc transports valid coins along a circular sorting path across a series of openings in the front plate. The openings are of increasing size, such that coins of the smallest diameter will fall down through the first opening in the transport direction, whereas coins of the second smallest opening are separated through the next opening, etc.
However, it turns out that some coins do not roll smoothly down the coin rail. In fact, they may start bouncing along the way. As a result, the bouncing coins may reach the carrier disc at a distance from the circular sorting path, which in turn may lead to poor sorting of these bouncing coins.
Accordingly there is a need for improved ways of sorting coins.
In view of the above, an objective of this disclosure is to solve or at least reduce one or several of the drawbacks discussed above. Generally, the above objective is achieved by the attached independent patent claims.
A first aspect of this disclosure is the provision of a coin counting and sorting module comprising
a coin sorter wherein coins to be sorted are transported by a rotary disc along a circular sorting path across a series of openings of increasing size;
a coin bowl for receiving a mass of coins to be sorted, said coin bowl having an inner surface intended to be in contact with the coins to be sorted, the inner surface comprising a rotating surface adapted for being rotated when the module is in operation;
a front coin sensor for detecting and removing counterfeit coins;
a coin-separating rail knife for receiving coins one by one at a first end thereof from the rotating surface, and for guiding the coins past the front coin sensor;
the coin sorter, the coin bowl, the front coin sensor, and the coin-separating rail knife being mounted on a front plate of the coin counting and sorting module,
wherein the coin counting and sorting module also comprises an inclined rail block for receiving accepted coins from the second end of the coin-separating rail knife and forwarding these coins to the coin sorter, said inclined rail block being mounted on the front plate of the coin counting and sorting module, and where an anti-bounce block is firmly fastened to the inclined rail block by a finite number of fastening elements.
As disclosed herein, the term “coin sorter” relates to a sorter of a type where coins to be sorted are transported by a rotary disc along a circular sorting path across a series of openings of increasing size. An example of a coin sorter of this type is disclosed in WO 2008/024043.
As disclosed herein, the term “coin bowl” relates to a bowl-shaped structure for receiving a plurality of coins to be sorted. A rotating surface within the bowl guides coins to a rail knife. Examples of such a coin bowl could be found in WO 97/07485 and WO 2008/024043.
As disclosed herein, the term “front coin sensor” relates to a sensor for detecting physical parameters of a passing coin, such as conductivity, permeability, diameter and thickness.
As disclosed herein, the term “coin-separating rail knife” relates to an elongated rail structure adapted for capturing coins in a coin bowl and guiding them further. Such knives and rails are known and examples are disclosed in WO 97/07485 and WO 2008/024043.
According to one embodiment, the anti-bounce block is rectangular in a front view.
According to one embodiment, the anti-bounce block has a length within the range of 50-100 mm and a height within the range of 5-20 mm.
According to one embodiment, the inclined rail block has an angled end part adapted for guiding coins one by one from the plane of the coin separating rail knife to the plane of the coin sorter.
According to one embodiment, the inclination of the angled end part of the inclined rail block amounts to a value comprised within the range from and including 1° up to and including 15° in relation to the plane of the sorting rail knife.
According to one embodiment, the finite number of fastening elements for firmly fastening the anti-bounce block is 2 or 3.
According to one embodiment, the overall shape of the anti-bounce block is a substantially rectangular parallelepiped.
According to one embodiment, there are elevated regions on the surface of the anti-bounce block that is adapted to be facing away from the inclined rail block in vicinity of openings for receiving fastening elements.
In an alternative embodiment of the first aspect of this disclosure, the anti-bounce block is substantially wedge-shaped.
According to one embodiment, the anti-bounce block is made entirely of metal. The term “metal” is intended to encompass ordinary metals used in engineering industry, such as steel, stainless steel, brass and cast iron. The inclined rail block (20) is also, according to one embodiment, made entirely of metal.
According to one embodiment, said fastening elements are selected from the group of bolts, screws and nuts and other similar elements for joining metal pieces.
A second aspect of this disclosure is a coin handling apparatus comprising a coin counting and sorting module (10) in accordance with claims 1-12. As disclosed herein, the term “coin handling apparatus” relates to any kind of coin handling apparatus adapted for sorting a mixture of coins into different denominations.
The present disclosure will now be described with reference to the enclosed figures, in which:
The present disclosure is focused on improving the performance of coin sorter having a circular sorting path across a series of openings of increased size, and where a coin to be sorted is transported along this sorting path. Such a module is often constructed such that the coin to be sorted is transported to the coin sorter on an inclined rail block. It may be advantageous if the inclined rail block is designed to deliver the transported coin to the coin sorter such that the resilient rim will engage the coin in good time before the first coin opening of the base plate. Consequently, the at least one protruding part of the resilient rim will have a certain distance available before the coin have to be pressured towards the border of the base plate, e.g. before the first coin opening. This may be advantageous if for example the coin is bouncing slightly just when the coin is grabbed by the rim. According to embodiments of the present invention, the resilient rim may engage the transported coin at coin at least 35 mm before the first coin opening which may reduce the miss sorting. In the case of the inclined rail block being mounted to the coin counting and sorting module in a plane behind the plane of the coin sorter, an angled end portion of the inclined rail block may be an simple and easy to manufacture solution to ensure that the resilient rim can engage the transported coin at the proper distance from the first coin opening.
The present disclosure will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided for thoroughness and completeness, and fully convey the scope of the invention to the skilled person.
The coin separating knife 128, one end 120 of which according to the above is arranged in connection with the rubber disc 116, is at a downward inclination and is connected at its second end 114 to an anti bounce block 110 which will be described in greater detail below. The coin separating knife 128 and the anti bounce block 110 are mounted on an inclined rail block 112. A coin brought into contact to the separating knife 128, by the rotation of the rubber disc 116, and thus separated from the mass of coins to be sorted will by the inclination of the separating knife 128 be brought into a rolling downward motion along the upper side of the separating knife, which has been made flat so as to avoid coins from falling off the knife once separated, towards the front coin sensor 108. When the coin is transported the inclined rail block 112 will support the planar surface of the coin while the upper side of the separating knife 128, and later the anti bounce block 110, will support its perimeter. When rolling down the coin separating knife 128, the coin may for different reasons start to bounce. The coin may for example not be completely round, as in the case of for example British 20 and 50 pence coins, or the bouncing movement may originate from when the coin are separated at the coin bowl 118, or for some other reason.
The functionality of the anti bounce block 110 will now be described in conjunction with
When trying to solve this problem, the inventors tried a variety of different possible solutions. Some solutions included an anti bounce block which could move up and down in relation to the inclined rail block, to have a damping effect on a bouncing coin. The dampening abilities of such an anti bounce block varied, were hard to control and could in some situations even increase bouncing. The best solutions included an anti bounce block made of metal rigidly mounted on the inclined rail block by a finite number of fastening elements. Surprisingly, an anti bounce block rigidly fastened by a finite number of fastening elements showed much better anti bounce abilities than if the anti bounce block and inclined rail block would be integrated into one integral piece of metal. Hence, the integrated solution was rejected because of its terrible ability to absorb bouncing. In a further tested solution, the anti bounce block was made of a plastic material but the result was not satisfactory. The theoretical explanation to why the chosen design of the anti bounce block showed such satisfactory results is not fully known. According to the theory of the inventors, bouncing energy is absorbed by the anti bounce block mass and transferred away in a beneficial way with this set up.
Two different designs of the anti bounce block where tested. One design which is explained in detail in conjunction with
As can be seen in
It should be pointed out that the bouncing amplitudes obtained in the test are generally larger than amplitudes obtained in a corresponding CAM. The test conditions were selected in order to get high bouncing amplitudes that are easy to measure and to assess. It should be concluded that the rectangular as well as the wedge-shaped anti-bounce block both result in lower bouncing compared to the state-of-the-art solution disclosed in WO 2008/024043.
Moreover, the rectangular anti-bounce block has a lower production cost than the wedge-shaped block.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a coin counting and sorting module 100 wherein the design of the inclined rail block 112 is designed to deliver a transported coin 504 to the coin sorter such that a resilient rim 606 of the coin sorter will engage the coin 504 at least 35 mm from a first coin opening 506 of the base plate 106 of the coin sorter. This feature of such a coin counting and sorting module 100 will be explained in conjunction with
The present disclosure also provides coin handling apparati (not shown in the figures) comprising a coin counting and sorting module in accordance with the present disclosure. Examples of such coin handling apparati are retail cash systems capable of efficient sorting of a large amount of coins and dispensing of specific amounts of different coin denominations in a cash till. The present module may also be used in coin deposit systems and other systems and apparati involving sorting of coins.
The person skilled in the art realizes that the present invention by no means is limited to the embodiments described above. On the contrary, many modifications and variations are possible within the scope of the appended claims. For example, the design of the coin counting and sorting device described above is just exemplary, other ways of feeding coins to the coin sorter is equally possible.
Additionally, variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by the skilled person in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measured cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13161528 | Mar 2013 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3978962 | Gregory, Jr. | Sep 1976 | A |
4059122 | Kinoshita | Nov 1977 | A |
4943258 | Abe | Jul 1990 | A |
4988860 | Wollet et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5240099 | Brown et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5382191 | Rasmussen | Jan 1995 | A |
6138813 | Lamb et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168001 | Davis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6350193 | Paulsen | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6679770 | Sugai et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7490709 | Jönsson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7658668 | Hill | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8202144 | Hino et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20090305620 | Hino et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20130277177 | Kuesel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201331787 | Oct 2009 | CN |
10 2010 049 208 | Apr 2012 | DE |
0 469 886 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 950 989 | Oct 1999 | EP |
WO 9423397 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO 9705581 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9707485 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9933030 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 03049049 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2008024043 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report Dated Sep. 12, 2013, for co-pending European Patent Application No. 13161542.9, (8 pages). |
European Search Report Dated Sep. 13, 2013, for co-pending European Patent Application No. 13161528.8, (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140295745 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |