The present invention relates to a module for projecting a light beam having the characteristics defined in the preamble to Claim 1.
Novel solutions have been under investigation in the automotive field for some time for the construction of front and rear vehicle lights formed by matrices of LEDs (an acronym which stands for “light-emitting diodes”) or other light-emitting devices so as to obtain devices that are more compact, particularly in terms of depth, and have novel aesthetic content.
As is known, conventional headlamps are based on a halogen or discharge lamp source and an optical system which can form a light distribution or pattern in accordance with the norms that are in force. In the literature, there are many examples of optical arrangements suitable for forming a predetermined pattern, for example, that relating to the dipped-beam function, and based on the use of semiconductor sources. Two significant cases are cited below: Valeo's US2003/202359 and Koito Manufacturing Co.'s EP1418381 (FIG. 1). In both cases, the optical arrangement used is composed of:
There are substantially two difficulties relating to this configuration:
1. poor total efficiency of the system due to the fact that some of the light is blocked by the mask,
2. difficulty in the alignment of the optical system and in particular in the positioning of the masks with a consequent reduction in mechanical tolerances and increase in costs.
The optical arrangement of the present patent is intended to overcome these difficulties by means of a radical simplification of the optical chain which is composed solely of the reflecting module, with consequent elimination of the mask and the refractive element.
The single semiconductor source (for example, of the LED type) has a lower luminous flux than a halogen or gas-discharge source. As a result, it is necessary to use a plurality of semiconductor sources to achieve the performance of a headlamp based on those sources (in terms of flux on the road). There are two alternatives:
a) single optics and multiple sources,
b) multiple module/source systems.
The first solution consists substantially of the replacement of, the conventional single source with a cluster of semiconductor sources packed as close together as possible (to maximize luminance and reduce lamp dimensions), and then the design of an optical system that is optimized for this type of modular source. The main difficulty consists of the thermal control of the sources that are packed so closely together since the performance of the sources is considerably reduced unless an adequate system is used to dissipate the heat generated.
The second solution consists of the use of a plurality of distinct optical systems each having its own source. The patterns generated by each optical system may be different so that to have all of the devices switched on is a necessary condition for achieving the whole pattern and flux; alternatively, the patterns may be identical (modular solution) so that the single module produces the entire pattern but it is necessary to switch on all of the modules provided to reach the required flux. The modular solution is more advantageous because it is more adaptable to stylistic requirements and to technical development (particularly in terms of flux) of the semiconductor sources. However, the need to arrange a plurality of modules side by side to create the single function (for example, fog lamp or dipped beam) may give rise to problems of mutual interference between the modules, particularly when stylistic needs require the function to be accommodated at greatly curved points of the bodywork; the beam emerging from the outlet opening of a module may be partially concealed by the adjacent module, with a consequent deterioration of the pattern as a whole.
The object of the present invention is to solve the problem of mutual interference between distinct optical systems designed for a lamp constructed in accordance with the principle of the modular solution.
This problem is solved according to the invention by a module for projecting a light beam having the characteristics defined in Claim 1.
By the use of reflecting surfaces that are designed in a manner such as to operate in a predominantly converging configuration, the optical module according to the invention solves the problem of mutual interference between devices in the modular solution.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.
Some preferred but non-limiting embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
a, 1b are schematic views of the optical chain for producing the dipped-beam pattern constituting the prior art,
FIGS. 10 to 12 show distributions of luminous intensity which can be achieved with the individual reflecting surfaces of the module of
With reference to
As is known, the light beam projected by a headlamp of this type in the dipped-beam (or passing-beam) function has to satisfy certain norms. For example,
The main critical aspect of the dipped-beam function pattern is constituted by the regions close to the horizon where the norm requires a very abrupt transition from the distribution maximum or peak P, at an angle of 1-2 degrees below the horizon, and intensity values close to zero above the horizon line. In a dipped-beam lamp according to the European norm, the luminous intensity distribution adopts the characteristic form shown in
Returning to
a) a light source 10 which, in a preferred embodiment, is an LED or chipLED semiconductor source,
b) a substantially flat support surface 20 on which the source 10 is arranged so as to emit light from only one side of the support surface 20,
c) a curved reflecting surface 30 which extends on one side of the support surface and has its concavity facing towards the support surface, and which is capable of reflecting the light originating from the source in a direction substantially parallel to an optical axis 2 of the module 1, defined as the axis extending through the centre of the source and parallel to the direction of travel of the vehicle, the reflecting surface being divided into a plurality of areas, and
d) a connecting surface 40 which connects at least two of the reflecting areas in a stepped manner.
As mentioned above, the curved reflecting surface 30 is divided into a plurality of reflecting areas. Each of the reflecting areas is designed to form a predetermined, substantially rectangular pattern, the horizontal extent of which (that is, the extent along the longer side of the substantially rectangular pattern) is determined by the horizontal divergence of the beam of rays emitted by the source 10 and reflected by that area, that is, by the angular amplitude, projected onto a horizontal plane, of the envelope of the rays emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area. Similarly, the vertical extent of the pattern (that is, its extent along the shorter side of the substantially rectangular pattern) is determined by the vertical divergence of the beam of rays emitted by the source 10 and reflected by that area, that is, by the angular amplitude, projected onto a vertical plane, of the envelope of the rays emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area.
When the vertical profile of the reflecting area is substantially parabolic, the vertical divergence at a given point of that area of the curved reflecting surface 30 coincides with the maximum vertical angle θ subtended by the source 10 at that point.
In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the areas is a complex surface which has a substantially parabolic vertical cross-section perpendicular to the support surface 20 and parallel to the optical axis z with an axis substantially parallel to the support surface 20 and a focus substantially coinciding with the source 10, and a substantially elliptical horizontal cross-section (perpendicular to the vertical cross-section and parallel to the flat support surface) having its primary focus F substantially coinciding with the source 10; this embodiment is characterized in that the light beam emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area has a divergence of less than 20° in the horizontal cross-section. The horizontal cross-section may also be parabolic with its focus F substantially coinciding with the source 10 so that the divergence in the horizontal cross-section is determined solely by the extended dimension of the source 10. This area is adjacent the flat support surface 20 and extends in a direction perpendicular to the flat support surface 20 for a limited distance so that the light beam emitted by the source 10 and reflected by that area has a divergence of less than 3° in the vertical cross-section.
In a preferred embodiment, at least one other of the areas is obtained by the anticlockwise rotation, through an angle of 15° about an axis substantially parallel to the optical axis, of a complex surface which, prior to rotation, has a substantially parabolic vertical cross-section perpendicular to the support surface 20 and parallel to the optical axis z, with an axis substantially parallel to the support surface 20 and a focus substantially coinciding with the source 10, and a substantially elliptical horizontal cross-section (perpendicular to the vertical cross-section and parallel to the flat support surface) having its primary focus F substantially coinciding with the source 10; this embodiment is characterized in that the light beam emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area has a divergence of less than 20° in the horizontal cross-section, the rotation having the purpose of rotating the substantially rectangular pattern formed by the light emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area anticlockwise through an angle of 15°. This area is adjacent the flat support surface 20 and extends in a direction perpendicular to the flat support surface 20.
In a preferred embodiment, at least one other of the areas is a complex surface of substantially elliptical horizontal cross-section with its primary focus substantially coinciding with the source 10; this embodiment is characterized in that the light beam emitted by the source 10 and reflected by the area has a horizontal divergence greater than 50°.
In a preferred embodiment, the curved reflecting surface 30 is divided into three areas:
The lateral reflecting areas 32 preferably extend in a direction perpendicular to the flat support surface 20 for a distance such that the portion of the light beam emitted by the source 10 and respectively reflected by the area 32 has a vertical divergence 8 of less than 3°. As can be seen from
The central reflecting area 31 is designed in a manner such that the portion of the light beam that is produced by the source 10 and reflected by that area 31 has a horizontal divergence greater than a predetermined angular value. This angular value is preferably 50°.
With reference to
The connecting surface 40 between the central area 31 and the lateral areas 32 and 33 is thus constructed so as to comply with two requirements:
a. not to be illuminated directly by the light emitted by the source 10, in order to minimize spurious reflections,
b. to maximize the amount of light falling on the lateral areas 32 and 33 farthest from the source 10.
According to a variant of the invention, the connecting surface 40 may in any case be reflective.
In a preferred embodiment, the module is intended for forming the pattern for the dipped-beam pattern. As mentioned above, that pattern is characterized by a divergence of the projected beam which is particularly critical for the regions of the lamp which project the light towards the distribution zone close to the horizon where the norm requires a very abrupt transition from the distribution maximum or peak, which is situated at an angle of 1-2 degrees below the horizon, to intensity values close to zero above the horizon line; the demarcation line at the horizon is known as the cut-off line. In the European dipped beam, the cut-off line has, on the right-hand side, an indentation forming an angle of about 15 degrees with the axis of the horizon. This indentation is absent from the American dipped beam and is reversed horizontally in UK and Japan. In a preferred embodiment relating to the dipped-beam function with approval, for example, in Europe, UK or Japan, one of the two areas 32, 33 characterized by vertical divergence of less than 3° is dedicated to the formation of the portion of the “cut-off” line which is inclined to the horizon, and the other of the two areas 32, 33 characterized by vertical divergence of less than 3° is dedicated to the formation of the portion of the pattern comprising the so-called HV point and the distribution intensity peak, whilst the third area 31 is dedicated to the remaining portion of the pattern. The light distribution as a whole produced by the module 1 is shown in
As stated, the curved reflecting surface 30 is composed of a plurality of reflecting areas 31, 32, 33. The reflecting areas 31 and 32 have a substantially parabolic vertical cross-section; the reflecting area 33 is produced by the anticlockwise rotation through 15° of a surface originally characterized by a substantially parabolic vertical cross-section.
In a preferred embodiment, to ensure the formation of a clear horizontal line of separation between the illuminated region and the dark region which is typical of the dipped-beam pattern, the curved reflecting surface 30 is positioned in the half space defined by the flat support surface 20 and facing towards the road surface and the perimeter of the source 10 is substantially tangential to a straight line extending through the focus F of the parabola and perpendicular to the optical axis z so that the light source 10 is positioned entirely in the half plane that is defined by the straight line and contains the vertex of the parabola.
In another preferred embodiment, to ensure the formation of a clear horizontal line of separation between the illuminated region and the dark region which is typical of the dipped-beam pattern, the curved reflecting surface 30 is positioned in the half space defined by the flat support surface 20 and facing away from the road surface and the perimeter of the source 10 is substantially tangential to a straight line extending through the focus F of the parabola and perpendicular to the optical axis z so that the source 10 is positioned entirely in the half plane that is defined by the straight line and does not contain the vertex of the parabola.
In a further preferred embodiment, the “direct” light, that is the light that is emitted directly by the source 10 and does not fall on the curved reflecting surface 30 or on the flat support surface 20, is masked by means of a suitable, substantially absorbent mask; the shape and dimensions of the mask are such that the mask blocks exclusively the direct light, that is, the outline of the shadow produced by the mask coincides with the edge of the outlet opening of the reflector, the outlet opening being defined as the section through which the light rays reflected by the curved reflecting surface 30 emerge. The mask is fixed to the flat support surface 20 in the immediate vicinity of the source 10 so that the fraction of the light reflected by the curved reflecting surface 30 which falls on the mask is minimized.
The embodiments described herein are intended to be considered as examples of the implementation of the invention; the invention may, however, be modified with regard to the shape and arrangement of parts and constructional and operational details in accordance with the many possible variants which will appear suitable to persons skilled in the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
EP 06425137.4 | Mar 2006 | EP | regional |