1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to moisture barrier fabrics and to methods for making them. The fabrics are suitable, e.g., as upholstery fabrics.
2. Description of Related Art
The need for fabric materials that are impervious, or at least resistant, to moisture has long been recognized in the upholstery industry. The desirability of preventing the penetration of liquids into household furniture is apparent to anyone with small children. Penetration of moisture into the interior of furniture can result in odors and decay of the internal parts of the furniture. In addition, fabrics for use in outdoor furniture are also desirably moisture resistant, since these fabrics are frequently exposed to the elements. Window treatment fabrics, by virtue of their placement near windows and doors, are often exposed to moisture as well.
Moisture barrier fabrics that are composite materials having a fabric “face cloth” and a latex backing layer are known in the art. The latex is typically applied in one or more coats, using a doctor blade or other device for applying a thin coating. Prior to application of the latex coating, however, composite moisture barrier fabrics have generally required treatment with a primer to prepare the fabric surface to receive the backing. This ensures good bonding between the fabric and the backing, and reduces the risk of delamination or separation. However, use of a primer requires an additional coating step and the requisite coating process equipment and the application of additional chemicals to the fabric.
Many of the latices used as fabric coatings have relatively high curing temperatures. This limits the type of fabric that can be used in making the face cloth to those that have melting points well above the curing temperature of the latex. Often, a latex is used that has a curing temperature in excess of 300° F., which would turn a woven polypropylene fabric into a puddle of resin. This effectively removes polypropylene from consideration as a possible facecloth material.
Typically, the face cloth materials of the moisture barrier fabrics are treated with fluorochemicals to increase oil and water repellency. This treatment generally includes applying the fluorochemicals, e.g., by spraying or other methods, to the face cloth prior to assembly into the composite, or during application of the backing layer to form the composite. However, such application does not provide a complete coating of the backing layer, or even provide complete coverage of the face cloth, and small openings through which moisture can penetrate the fabric remain. In addition, subsequent processing of the fabric can damage the repellent coating.
Many moisture barrier fabrics have poor tactile qualities, and do not have a pleasant “hand.” Since these fabrics are often used as upholstery fabrics for interior use where the consumer will often touch the fabric, the heretofore necessary trade-off between moisture barrier performance and the feel of the fabric to the touch has resulted in some consumer dissatisfaction.
There remains a need in the art for a moisture barrier fabric that can be prepared using low coating/curing temperatures, that has improved repellency, that has good hand without sacrificing moisture barrier performance, and that does not require the use of a primer for good results.
In one embodiment, the invention relates to a method for preparing woven face cloth for back coating with a latex, comprising needling the fabric in a direction substantially opposite to the advance direction of the fabric to increase the density of the fabric by entangling the fibers thereof.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method for open-width washing of the facecloth fabric with a detergent and sodium carbonate to further increase fabric density by allowing the fabric to neck down or bulk at a substantially random rate.
In yet another embodiment, the invention relates to a latex formulation for use in forming the backcoating of the moisture barrier fabric, comprising a (meth)acrylic acid urethane copolymer having a curing temperature of approximately 250 to 275° F.
In yet embodiment, the invention relates to a method of applying fluorochemical to a moisture barrier fabric by immersing the dry moisture barrier fabric, including the latex backing, into a bath of fluorochemical, and removing excess fluorochemical from the treated fabric.
In yet another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of improving the hand of the fabric by treating the fabric with a solution containing about 10 to about 15 wt % polyurethane.
In yet another embodiment, the invention relates to a method for preparing a moisture barrier fabric comprising needling the fabric in a direction substantially opposite to the advance direction of the fabric with barbed needles to increase the density of the fabric by entangling the fibers thereof, open-width washing of the needled facecloth fabric with a detergent and sodium carbonate to further increase fabric density by allowing the fabric to neck down or bulk at a substantially random rate, coating one side of the fabric with at least one coating of a latex formulation for use in forming the backcoating of the moisture barrier fabric, comprising a (meth)acrylic acid urethane copolymer having a curing temperature of approximately 250 to 275° F., and immersing the dry moisture barrier fabric, including the latex backing, into a bath of fluorochemical and a solution containing about 10 to about 15 wt % polyurethane, and removing excess fluorochemical from the treated fabric.
The invention also relates to the moisture barrier fabric produced by the methods described above.
The invention provides a method for making a moisture barrier fabric that does not require the use of a primer coating to apply the backing layer. It also uses a latex composition that cures at a relatively low temperature, thereby decreasing process energy requirements and increasing the range of fibers that can be used to make the facecloth fabric. The application of fluorochemical to the entire composite, instead of just one surface of the facecloth fabric, encapsulates the composite with water and oil repellent, and tends to close small openings in the composite that might otherwise admit moisture. Finally, the application of polyurethane to the fabric gives it a softer, more pleasant hand, rendering the fabric more desirable to consumers.
The invention will be described in more detail below by reference to the drawing figures, and to specific embodiments thereof, which are intended to be illustrative only, and not to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
As shown in
While the processing rate of the needling step is necessarily somewhat variable, it has been found that processing at 20 yds/min gives satisfactory results. Needling is generally done to a depth of 7.5 in. at 1150 RPM. The needles may be staggered (i.e., horizontally offset) to achieve maximum penetration. Varying process parameters slightly can cause the needling to occur in a substantially random pattern. Needle penetrations are approximately 300 to about 400 penetrations per square inch, more particularly about 370 penetrations per square inch.
In another embodiment of the invention, the facecloth fabric (desirably after having undergone the needling step described above) undergoes open-width washing to further increase the density of the fabric. The fabric is contacted with a solution of detergent, desirably a nonionic detergent, and sodium carbonate at a temperature of around 120° F. This solution typically contains nonionic detergent in concentrations ranging from about 0.05 to about 1.00 g/L, more particularly about 0.25 g/L. Sodium carbonate is generally present in concentrations ranging from about 0.75 g/L to about 1.5 g/L, more particularly about 1.25 g/L. Washing can be done in an open width continuous washer, e.g., incorporating a soaping vat and one or more rinsing chambers. While the processing speed can vary, satisfactory results have been obtained using a processing speed of 40 yds/min.
As described above, the latex used to form the backcoating of the moisture barrier fabric of the invention is one that requires a low curing temperature, typically around 250° F. to around 275° F. Desirably, the latex will have a minimum viscosity of at least about 20,000 cp to about 30,000 cp at about 25° C., more particularly a minimum viscosity of about 50,000 to about 60,000 cp at about 25° C. Suitable latices generally include blends of acrylic and polyurethane polymers, such as PERFORMAX 3569A (acrylic-polyurethane latex emulsion, BF Goodrich).
The backcoating can applied using a series of tenter passes, although other techniques known in the art for applying coatings to fabrics can also be used. For example, the fabric can undergo one or more tenter passes wherein an acrylic-polyurethane copolymer is applied by a thin blade applicator at a temperature of around 275° F. and a dwell time of around 15 seconds. The latex copolymer may have incorporated therein an antimicrobial, such as INTERSEPT antimicrobial (Interface, Inc.). Additional tenter passes that are either dry (but at an elevated temperature of, e.g., around 250° F.) or using a tube blade (for a rounded edge application) may also be used.
After the backcoating has been applied, the fabric, including the backcoating, is submerged in a bath containing the fluorochemical. In a specific embodiment, the bath contains an aqueous solution of about 10 to about 15 wt % of a nonionic fluorochemical. One example of a suitable nonionic fluorochemical is FCl367 (fluoroaliphatic polymer composition, 3M).
The bath can also contain one or more stainblockers (such as, e.g., around 10 wt % of a stainblocker, such as a methylacrylic acid-based stain blocker, in particular, an anionic MAA based stainblocker, known in the art and marketed by companies such as 3M as FC672), wetting agents (typically non-rewetting wetting agents, such as, e.g., around 0.5 wt % of a wetting agent like Unifroth 0448 (nonionic surfactant, Unichem) are used to increase compatibility with the fluoropolymer).
The fabric may also be treated with a solution of about 10 to about 15 wt % polyurethane, in order to modify the hand of the fabric (i.e., to make it feel softer). The polyurethane can be incorporated into the fluorochemical treatment solution, or applied as a separate step, if desired. Desirably, the polyurethane is ethoxylated in order to increase its emulsifiability, although non-ethoxylated polymers can also be used. An example of a suitable ethoxylated polyurethane is Dicrylan BSRN (urethane emulsion, CIBA).
The fluorochemical and/or polyurethane is applied in the bath at a rate of about 10 to about 70 % wet pick up, and a liquor to goods ratio of about 150:1. The application temperature is not critical, and the solution may be applied at ambient temperature. Dwell time in the bath can range from about 1 to about 5 seconds. Any excess treatment liquid is removed from the fabric, e.g., by passing the fabric through nip rollers at a nip pressure of about 20 to about 40 psi. The treatment mixture is then allowed to cure at a temperature of about 225 to about 300° F.
The invention has been described above with respect to its specific embodiments. This description is not intended to limit the literal scope of the appended claims or of the range of equivalents to which the claims are entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2991536 | Moler | Jul 1961 | A |
3208875 | Holden | Jan 1962 | A |
3843563 | Davis et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4309800 | Foster | Jan 1982 | A |
5747392 | Xiao et al. | May 1998 | A |
5792715 | Duval et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6169043 | Li | Jan 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 445 394 | Sep 1991 | EP |
WO 02070810 | Sep 2002 | EP |
WO 9942284 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9950062 | Oct 1999 | WO |