Molasses binder

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10053558
  • Patent Number
    10,053,558
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 21, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
A binder based predominantly on molasses which incorporates both polymeric and monomeric polycarboxylic acid components to form a composite including both melanoidin and polyester polymeric structures. The binder incorporates the chemical profile of molasses with a mixture of polycarboxylic acids which combines to form a strong and weatherable binder composition which may be used to bind loosely or non-assembled matter.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a molasses binder composition for binding loosely or non-assembled matter. In particular, a molasses binder composition and articles fabricated from binding non- or loosely assembled matter with a molasses binder composition is described.


BACKGROUND

Thermosetting binders comprise a variety of phenol-aldehyde, urea-aldehyde, melamine-aldehyde, and other condensation-polymerization materials like the furane and polyurethane resins. Thermosetting binders may be characterized by being transformed into insoluble and infusible materials by means of either heat or catalytic action. Binder compositions containing phenol-, resorcinol-, urea-, melamine-formaldehyde, phenolfurfuraldehyde, and the like are used for the bonding of textiles, plastics, rubbers, and many other materials.


The effluent obtained in the preparation of sucrose by repeated evaporation, crystallization and centrifugation of juices from sugar cane and from sugar beets is referred to as molasses. Cane molasses is a by-product of the manufacture or refining of sucrose from sugar cane. Beet molasses is a by-product of the manufacture of sucrose from sugar beets. Citrus molasses is the partially dehydrated juices obtained from the manufacture of dried citrus pulp. Hemicellulose extract is a mixture of pentose and hexose sugars which is a by-product of the manufacture of pressed wood. Specifically hemicellulose extract is a molasses that is the concentrated soluble material obtained from the treatment of wood at elevated temperature and pressure, typically without use of acids, alkalis, or salts. Starch molasses is a by-product of dextrose manufactured from starch derived from corn or grain sorghums wherein the starch is hydrolyzed by enzymes and/or acid.


Historically, molasses has been used as a binder within various commercial products. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,961,081 describes using molasses as a binder in preparing livestock feed. U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,139 describes using molasses as a binder in the manufacture of structural building materials and French Published Application FR 2,924,719 describes using molasses in the manufacture of mineral wool insulation materials.


The glass wool or mineral wool industry has historically used a phenol formaldehyde (PF) binder to bind the fibers. PF binders provide suitable properties to the final products; however, environmental considerations have motivated the development of alternative binders. One such alternative binder is the nitrogenous polymer derived from reacting a carbohydrate and an amine base, for example, U.S. Published Application No. 2005/0027283. Another alternative binder is the esterification products of reacting a polycarboxylic acid and a polyol, for example, U.S. Published Application No. 2005/0202224.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

According to the present disclosure, a binder composition comprises molasses and a polycarboxylic acid formulated for causing cohesion upon contacting non- or loosely assembled matter.


In illustrative embodiments, the binder comprises molasses, a monomeric polycarboxylic acid and a polymeric polycarboxylic acid. In one embodiment, the binder exhibits significant resistance to weathering. In one embodiment, the binder is a composite melanoidin and polyester product comprising products of reacting a molasses with a polymeric polycarboxylic acid and monomeric polycarboxylic acid in the presence of a sodium hypophosphite catalyst. In another embodiment, the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.25 to about 1.5 by weight.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the shell bone longitudinal tensile strength test for weathered and dry samples for comparative example 1-4, examples 1-10 and a reference composition.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the invention to the particular forms described, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.


It should be appreciated that the binders described herein may be used in manufacturing products from a collection of non- or loosely assembled matter. For example, these binders may be employed to fabricate fiber products. These products may be made from woven or non-woven fibers. The fibers can be heat-resistant or non-heat-resistant fibers or combinations thereof. In one illustrative embodiment, the binders are used to bind mineral fibers to make mineral wool thermal insulation. For example, the binders are used to bind glass fibers to make fiberglass. In another illustrative embodiment, the binders are used to make cellulosic compositions. With respect to cellulosic compositions, the binders may be used to bind cellulosic matter to fabricate, for example, wood fiber board which has desirable physical properties (e.g., mechanical strength).


One embodiment of the invention is directed to a method for manufacturing products from a collection of non- or loosely assembled matter. One example of using this method is in the fabrication of mineral wool insulation, for example fiberglass. Another example of using this method is the fabrication of rock wool thermal insulation. Yet another example of using this method is the fabrication of wood board from cellulosic fibers. However, as indicated above, this method can be utilized in the fabrication of any material, as long as the method produces or promotes cohesion when utilized.


As used herein, the phrase “formaldehyde-free” means that a binder or a material that incorporates a binder liberates less than about 1 ppm formaldehyde as a result of drying and/or curing. The 1 ppm is based on the weight of sample being measured for formaldehyde release. One aspect of the present invention is that the binders described herein can be manufactured as formaldehyde-free.


The term “cured” indicates that the binder has been exposed to conditions so as to initiate a chemical change. Examples of these chemical changes include, but are not limited to, (i) covalent bonding, (ii) hydrogen bonding of binder components, and chemically cross-linking the polymers and/or oligomers in the binder. These changes may increase the binder's durability and solvent resistance as compared to the uncured binder. Curing a binder may result in the formation of a thermoset material. In addition, a cured binder may result in an increase in adhesion between the matter in a collection as compared to an uncured binder. Curing can be initiated by, for example, heat, electromagnetic radiation or, electron beams.


In a situation where the chemical change in the binder results in the release of water, e.g. polymerization and cross-linking, a cure can be determined by the amount of water released above that would occur from drying alone. The techniques used to measure the amount of water released during drying as compared to when a binder is cured, are well known in the art. In contrast, an uncured binder is one that has not been cured.


In illustrative embodiments, a binder composition comprises a polymeric product of a reaction between molasses, a polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and a monomeric polycarboxylic acid. In one embodiment, the polymeric product comprises predominantly molasses. For example the polymeric product has a total weight that is attributable primarily to the amount of molasses used or the weight percentage of molasses is greater than the weight percentage of all other components. In another embodiment, the binder composition is a polymeric product of a catalyzed reaction between molasses, a polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and a monomeric polycarboxylic acid. For example, sodium hypophosphite may be used as a catalyst.


As used herein, molasses is a by-product of the manufacture of purified sugars or the soluble material obtained from the treatment of wood. For example, the final effluent obtained in the preparation of sucrose by repeated evaporation, crystallization and centrifugation of juices from sugar cane and from sugar beets is referred to as molasses. During the manufacture of the sucrose, crystallization is used to remove sucrose from a super-saturated solution. After crystallization, the solution left behind includes a complex mixture of compounds which varies in composition according to plant source, location grown, season, age, and weather conditions. Furthermore, the efficiency and steps taken to crystallize the sucrose can result in compositional variation between molasses. For example, with the improvement of continuous centrifugation methods, the extraction of crystallized sucrose has become more efficient, therefore, modern molasses contains relatively less sucrose.


Examples of molasses include cane molasses, which is a by-product of the manufacture or refining of sucrose from sugar cane. Beet molasses is a by-product of the manufacture of sucrose from sugar beets. Citrus molasses is the partially dehydrated juices obtained from the manufacture of dried citrus pulp. Hemicellulose extract is a mixture of pentose and hexose sugars which is a by-product of the manufacture of pressed wood. Specifically hemicellulose extract is a molasses that is the concentrated soluble material obtained from the treatment of wood at elevated temperature and pressure without use of acids, alkalis, or salts. Starch molasses is a by-product of dextrose manufactured from starch derived from corn or grain sorghums wherein the starch is hydrolyzed by enzymes and/or acid.


A representative molasses is a liquid being approximately 25% water by weight. Molasses may be diluted or evaporated to adjust the weight percent of water; however, as used herein, the weight percentages are based on a molasses that includes 25% by weight water. Molasses is characterized as having a high concentration of sugars; for example, molasses may have total sugars of about 50% by weight. This concentration may vary significantly; concentrations of total sugars in molasses may vary from about 30-60% by weight. The density of molasses ranges from about 1.3 to about 1.5 g/mL and organic matter comprises about 55-70%. Nitrogen content may vary from about 0.5-3% as determined by elemental analysis. The nitrogen content is in the form of proteins, amino acids, and oligomers thereof. Protein may comprise about 5-10% of the total weight. The ratio of C:N as determined by elemental analysis may be in the range from about 50:1 to about 15:1.


The sugar content is primarily a mixture of sucrose, dextrose, and fructose. The mixture also contains a number of vitamins and minerals which remain soluble during the crystallization of the sucrose. For example, elemental analysis shows that molasses is a source of calcium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, sulfur, sodium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. Other amino acids and vitamins found within molasses include biotin, folic acid, inositol calcium pantothenate, pyridoxine, riboflavin, thiamine, niacin, and choline. Molasses may act as a buffer with a pH in the range of about 4 to about 7.


In illustrative embodiments, a binder composition comprises a molasses having a carbon to nitrogen ratio of less about 27:1 as determined by elemental analysis. While not being limited to theory, it is believed that the nitrogen content of molasses is in the form of proteins and amino acids which are capable of reacting with the reducing sugars within molasses to form melanoidin products. Melanoidin products are nitrogenous polymers or oligomers which are characteristically brown in color. It is believed that molasses obtains its naturally brown color, at least in part, from the formation of these products. These melanoidin products are capable of further reaction under the appropriate conditions. For example, in the presence of carboxylic acids, ester linkages may form between 1 or more molecules of a polycarboxylic acid and one or more molecules of a melanoidin product. The concentration of the melanoidin products is believed to initially be quite low. Without dehydration, catalysis, or being subjected to curative temperatures, molasses is known to be a stable composition that does not exhibit substantial changes over time.


In illustrative embodiments, molasses comprising less than about 70% sugar by dry weight may be used to form the binder composition of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, the binder comprises a molasses including about 3% to about 16% reducing sugar by weight. In another embodiment, the molasses can be derived from sugar cane. In alternative embodiments, the molasses may be derived from alternative sources such as sugar beets, corn, maize, citrus fruits or wood products. According to one aspect of the present disclosure, the selection of molasses type may influence the relative ratio of the polymeric and monomeric polycarboxylic acids which may be used to produce a binder.


In illustrative embodiments, the binder composition is predominantly comprised of molasses. In one embodiment, the ratio of the molasses to a combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.5 to about 0.9 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the molasses to the combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.6 to about 0.8 by weight.


In illustrative embodiments, molasses may be partially or completely substituted by dextrin. Dextrin is a term used to describe the group of low-molecular-weight carbohydrates produced by the hydrolysis of starch. Dextrins are mixtures of linear α-(1,4)-linked D-glucose polymers starting with an α-(1,6) bond. In one embodiment, the dextrin comprises maltodextrin. The method of producing the dextrin may have a substantial affect on its chemical composition, however, these methods are well-known in the art. In illustrative embodiments, the dextrin is derived from flora-derived starch. In one embodiment, the flora is a tuber such as a potato, cassava, arrowroot, yam, or sweet potato. In another embodiment, the flora is a seed such as corn, corn, rye, rice, barley, millet, oats or sorghum. In yet another embodiment, the flora is a nut such as chestnut, sweet chestnut, or hazel nut. In yet another embodiment the flora is a vegetable as peas or bean.


In illustrative embodiments, the dextrin has a dextrose equivalent of about 5 to about 100. In one embodiment, the dextrin has a dextrose equivalent of about 10 to about 75. In another embodiment, the dextrin has a dextrose equivalent of about 15 to about 50.


One aspect of the present disclosure is that molasses is a renewable feed-stock. As such, the materials bound with a binder of the present disclosure may be manufactured using a predominantly bio-based renewable feed-stock. Accordingly, the binder is predominantly bio-based and is thus not predominantly petroleum-based.


In illustrative embodiments, the binder composition comprises a polymeric polycarboxylic acid. As used herein, a polymeric polycarboxylic acid is an organic polymer or oligomer containing more than five pendant carboxy group. A polymeric polycarboxylic acid may be a homopolymer or copolymer prepared from unsaturated carboxylic acids including, but not necessarily limited to, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, crotonic acid, isocrotonic acid, maleic acid, cinnamic acid, 2-methylmaleic acid, itaconic acid, 2-methylitaconic acid, α,β-methyleneglutaric acid, and the like. Alternatively, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid may be prepared from unsaturated anhydrides including, but not necessarily limited to, maleic anhydride, itaconic anhydride, acrylic anhydride, methacrylic anhydride, and the like, as well as mixtures thereof. Methods for polymerizing these acids and anhydrides are well-known in the chemical art. The polymeric polycarboxylic acid may additionally comprise a copolymer of one or more of the aforementioned unsaturated carboxylic acids or anhydrides and one or more vinyl compounds including, but not necessarily limited to, styrene, α-methylstyrene, acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, isobutyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, n-butyl methacrylate, isobutyl methacrylate, glycidyl methacrylate, vinyl methyl ether, vinyl acetate, and the like. Methods for preparing these copolymers are well-known in the art. In illustrative embodiments, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid comprises homopolymers and copolymers of polyacrylic acid. In another embodiment, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid comprises homopolymers and copolymers of maleic anhydride.


In illustrative embodiments, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid is a low molecular weight polymer. As used herein, the term low molecular weight polymer includes those polymers having a molecular weight of less than about 10,000 g/mol. In one embodiment, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid has a molecular weight of from about 1000 to about 8000 g/mol. In another embodiment, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid has a molecular weight from about 2000 to about 5000 g/mol. One aspect of the present disclosure is that the molecular weight of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid may affect the weatherability of the resulting binder. The utility of higher molecular weight polymeric polycarboxylic acids may be limited by solubility, viscosity, or structural limitations.


Illustratively, a polymeric polycarboxylic acid may be an acid, for example, polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, and like polymeric polycarboxylic acids, copolymers thereof, anhydrides thereof, and mixtures thereof. Examples of commercially available polyacrylic acids include AQUASET-529 (Rohm & Haas, Philadelphia, Pa., USA), CRITERION 2000 (Kemira, Helsinki, Finland, Europe), NF1 (H.B. Fuller, St. Paul, Minn., USA), and SOKALAN (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany, Europe). With respect to SOKALAN, this is a water-soluble polyacrylic polymer or copolymer. Grades of SOKALAN include homopolymers of acrylic acid and various copolymers. For example, one grade is a homopolymer of acrylic acid having a molecular weight of approximately 4000 g/mol. Another example is a copolymer of acrylic acid and maleic acid having a molecular weight of approximately 4000 g/mol. AQUASET-529 is a composition containing polyacrylic acid cross-linked with glycerol, also containing sodium hypophosphite as a catalyst. CRITERION 2000 is an acidic solution of a partial salt of polyacrylic acid, having a molecular weight of approximately 2000 g/mol. With respect to NF1, this is a copolymer containing carboxylic acid functionality and hydroxy functionality, as well as units with neither functionality; NF1 also contains chain transfer agents, such as sodium hypophosphite or organophosphate catalysts.


In one embodiment, the binder composition comprises a polymeric polycarboxylic acid. In one embodiment, the binder composition comprises a polymeric polyacrylic acid. In another embodiment, the binder composition comprises a copolymer of an acrylic acid and a maleic anhydride. In another embodiment, the binder composition comprises a polymeric polycarboxylic acid having a molecular weight of about 2000 to about 6000 g/mol.


In illustrative embodiments, the binder composition comprises a monomeric polycarboxylic acid. As used herein, the term “polycarboxylic acid” indicates a dicarboxylic, tricarboxylic, tetracarboxylic, pentacarboxylic, and like monomeric polycarboxylic acids, and anhydrides, and combinations thereof. Illustratively, a monomeric polycarboxylic acid may be a dicarboxylic acid, including, but not limited to, unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, aromatic dicarboxylic acids, unsaturated cyclic dicarboxylic acids, saturated cyclic dicarboxylic acids, hydroxy-substituted derivatives thereof, and the like.


Illustratively, the polycarboxylic acid(s) itself may be a tricarboxylic acid, including, but not limited to, unsaturated aliphatic tricarboxylic acids, saturated aliphatic tricarboxylic acids, aromatic tricarboxylic acids, unsaturated cyclic tricarboxylic acids, saturated cyclic tricarboxylic acids, hydroxy-substituted derivatives thereof, and the like. It is appreciated that any such polycarboxylic acids may be optionally substituted, such as with hydroxy, halo, alkyl, alkoxy, and the like.


In one embodiment, the polycarboxylic acid is the saturated aliphatic tricarboxylic acid, citric acid. In another, the polycarboxylic acids is aconitic acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid, butane tetracarboxylic acid dihydride, butane tricarboxylic acid, chlorendic acid, citraconic acid, dicyclopentadiene-maleic acid adducts, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, adducts of dipentene and maleic acid, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), fumaric acid, glutaric acid, isophthalic acid, itaconic acid, maleic acid, malic acid, mesaconic acid, biphenol A or bisphenol F reacted via the KOLBE-Schmidt reaction with carbon dioxide to introduce 3-4 carboxyl groups, oxalic acid, phthalic acid, sebacic acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, terephthalic acid, tetrabromophthalic acid, tetrachlorophthalic acid, tetrahydrophthalic acid, trimellitic acid, trimesic acid, or the like, or anhydrides, or combinations thereof. In another embodiment, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is a mixture of citric acid and maleic acid or maleic anhydride.


One aspect of the present disclosure is that the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid work in a synergistic manner as crosslinking agents for constituents of the molasses as described herein. When exposed to curative temperatures, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid are capable of forming ester linkages between the various constituents of the molasses. Furthermore, as described herein, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acids facilitate the reaction which results in the formation of additional melanoidin products. Additionally, the monomeric and polymeric polycarboxylic acid may crosslink polyesters and/or polymeric melanoidins. In illustrative embodiments, the catalyst facilitates esterification reactions within the scope of the foregoing reactions. Additionally, the polycarboxylic acid may serve in a catalytic role in the esterification and the Maillard reactions. The result of the melanoidin forming reactions and the polyester forming reactions is a polymeric network which has a highly cross-linked polymer network of substantial complexity with surprisingly beneficial properties as a binder.


Another aspect of the present disclosure is that the combination of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid overcomes limitations observed when either of a monomeric polycarboxylic acid or a polymeric polycarboxylic acid was used individually as a crosslinking agent. Specifically, it was observed that when a monomeric polycarboxylic acid was used without the addition of a polymeric polycarboxylic acid, the weatherability of the binder was insufficient for many applications. Furthermore, binders comprising a polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the exclusion of a monomeric polycarboxylic acid yielded binders with sufficient strength and weatherability, but had other adverse properties. For example, the viscosity of the reactive binder solution was comparatively high, the cure times were relatively longer, and the expense of the composition was relatively larger.


While not being limited to theory, it is believed that the advantage in mixing the monomeric and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid stems in part to the difference in physical and chemical properties that distinguish these materials. Particularly, the differences in properties observed in a substantially dehydrated state. For example, the pKa of a monomeric polycarboxylic acid will be relatively lower than that of a corresponding polycarboxylic acid due to the effect of charge delocalization along the polymeric backbone. Accordingly, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid will have a relatively larger influence on the acid catalysis of the esterification than the polymeric polycarboxylic acid due to its comparatively greater acidity. Furthermore, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is capable of more complete homogenization throughout the dried uncured reaction mixture compared to the relatively larger polymeric polycarboxylic acid.


For example, a polymeric chain may contain several hundred carboxylic acid groups in relatively close proximity. Accordingly, in a substantially dried state, pockets which contain very high local concentrations of strictly carboxylic acid functionality to the exclusion of melanoidin or sugar molecules may exist if the polymeric polycarboxylic acid was used alone. However, the small molecular weight of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid lowers the probability (i.e., it is entropically unfavorable) that a high concentration of carboxylic acid functionalities are in close proximity. Thus, the inclusion of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid provides the dried binder with a relatively higher degree of homogeneity for the dispersion of carboxylic acid functionality. In another aspect, the increased homogenization may improve availability of the reactive carboxylic acid groups to the molasses constituents. Another aspect is that the relatively small molecular cross-section of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid improves its diffusion capabilities in a substantially dry reactive mixture. Again, this aspect would positively contribute to the availability of the carboxylic acid functionality to participate in esterifications.


One aspect in which the polymeric polycarboxylic acid contributes to the synergistic relationship is that it possesses a relatively higher number of carboxylic acid groups which are capable of crosslinking more compounds through esterification. This facilitates the quick formation of relatively large polymeric units, thus increasing physical performance of the binder, such as tensile strength. Furthermore, the cross-linked molecular backbones will have as their backbones the carbon-carbon bonds associated with the polymeric polycarboxylic acid as opposed to the esters. It is hypothesized that the presence of more carbon-carbon bonds within the binder contributes to the improved weatherability of this binder composition. It may be that these attributes, at least in part, provide for the unexpected synergism between the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid within the scope of the present disclosure.


In illustrative embodiments, the monomeric polycarboxylic acid and the polymeric polycarboxylic acid are added in substantially equivalent weights, the combination being as much as 50% of the total weight of the binder. In one embodiment, the ratio of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.05 to about 0.4 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.1 to about 0.3 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.01 to about 0.4 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.03 to about 0.2 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.25 to about 1.5 by weight. In yet another embodiment, the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.5 to about 1 by weight.


In illustrative embodiments, the binder composition may include a catalyst. For example, the catalyst may be an alkali metal polyphosphate, an alkali metal dihydrogen phosphate, a polyphosphoric acid, and an alkyl phosphinic acid, an oligomer, a polymer bearing phosphorous-containing groups and mixtures thereof. Illustratively, the catalyst may be sodium hypophosphite, sodium phosphite, potassium phosphite, disodium pyrophosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, potassium phosphate, potassium polymetaphosphate, potassium polyphosphate, potassium tripolyphosphate, sodium trimetaphosphate, or sodium tetrametaphosphate, or mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the catalyst is sodium hypophosphite. In one embodiment, the ratio of the catalyst to a combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.001 to about 0.1 by weight. In another embodiment, the ratio of the catalyst to a combination of the molasses, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.003 to about 0.008 by weight.


As discussed below, various additives can be incorporated into the binder composition. These additives give the binders of the present invention additional desirable characteristics. For example, the binder may include a silicon-containing coupling agent. Many silicon-containing coupling agents are commercially available from various manufacturers. For example, Dow-Corning Corporation, Petrarch Systems, AkzoNobel and by the General Electric Company. Illustratively, the silicon-containing coupling agent includes compounds such as silylethers and alkylsilyl ethers, each of which may be optionally substituted, such as with halogen, alkoxy, amino, and the like. In one variation, the silicon-containing compound is an amino-substituted silane, such as, gamma-aminopropyltriethoxy silane (General Electric Silicones, SILQUEST A-1101; Wilton, Conn.; USA). In another variation, the silicon-containing compound is an amino-substituted silane, for example, aminoethylaminopropyltrimethoxy silane (Dow Z-6020; Dow Chemical, Midland, Mich.; USA). In another variation, the silicon-containing compound is gamma-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (General Electric Silicones, SILQUEST A-187). In yet another variation, the silicon-containing compound is an n-propylamine silane (Creanova (formerly Huls America) HYDROSIL 2627; Creanova; Somerset, N.J.; U.S.A.).


The silicon-containing coupling agents are typically present in the binder in the range from about 0.1 percent to about 1 percent by weight based upon the dissolved binder solids (i.e., about 0.1 percent to about 1 percent based upon the weight of the solids added to the aqueous solution). In one application, one or more of these silicon-containing compounds can be added to the aqueous uncured binder. The binder is then applied to the material to be bound. Thereafter, the binder may be cured if desired. These silicone containing compounds enhance the ability of the binder to adhere to the matter the binder is disposed on, such as glass fibers. Enhancing the binder's ability to adhere to the matter improves, for example, its ability to produce or promote cohesion in non- or loosely assembled substance(s).


In another illustrative embodiment, a binder of the present invention may include one or more corrosion inhibitors. These corrosion inhibitors prevent or inhibit the eating or wearing away of a substance, such as, metal caused by chemical decomposition brought about by an acid. When a corrosion inhibitor is included in a binder of the present invention, the binder's corrosivity is decreased as compared to the corrosivity of the binder without the inhibitor present. In one embodiment, these corrosion inhibitors can be utilized to decrease the corrosivity of the binder-containing compositions described herein. Illustratively, corrosion inhibitors include one or more of the following, a dedusting oil, a monoammonium phosphate, sodium metasilicate pentahydrate, melamine, tin (II) oxalate, and/or methylhydrogen silicone fluid emulsion. When included in a binder of the present invention, corrosion inhibitors are typically present in the binder in the range from about 0.5 percent to about 2 percent by weight based upon the dissolved binder solids.


As described herein, binders can be used to produce or promote cohesion in non- or loosely assembled matter by placing the binder in contact with the matter to be bound. Any number of well known techniques can be employed to place the aqueous binder in contact with the material to be bound. For example, the aqueous binder can be sprayed on (for example during the binding of glass fibers) or applied via a roll-coat apparatus.


For example, these binders can be applied to a mat of mineral fibers (e.g., sprayed onto the mat), during production of mineral wool insulation products. Once the binder is in contact with the mineral fibers the residual heat from the mineral fibers (note that the mineral fibers are made from molten material and thus contain residual heat) and the flow of air through the fibrous mat will evaporate (i.e., remove) water from the binder. Removing the water leaves the remaining components of the binder on the fibers as a coating of viscous or semi-viscous high-solids liquid. Further heating of the binder may result in a substantially dry uncured reactive mixture. This coating of viscous, semi-viscous high-solids liquid or substantially dry binder functions as a binder. At this point, the mat has not been cured. In other words, the uncured binder functions to bind the mineral fibers in the mat.


Furthermore, it should be understood that the above described binders can be cured. For example, any of the above described binders can be disposed (e.g., sprayed) on the material to be bound, and then heated. For example, in the case of making mineral wool insulation products, after the aqueous binder has been applied to the mat, the binder coated mat is transferred to a curing oven. In the curing oven the mat is heated (e.g., from about 150° C. [˜300° F.] to about 315° C. [˜600° F.]) and the binder cures. The cured binder is a formaldehyde-free, water-resistant thermoset binder that attaches the mineral fibers of the mat together. Note that the drying and thermal curing may occur either sequentially, contemporaneously, or concurrently.


In illustrative embodiments, a method of binding loosely or non-assembled matter includes the steps of mixing a solution comprising a molasses, a monomeric polycarboxylic acid, a polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and a catalyst, disposing the solution on a collection of matter, and drying the solution to form a dehydrated reactive mixture. The method results in dehydrated reactive mixture binding the collection of matter. Illustratively, the composition as disclosed herein has properties that make it suitable for binding loosely or non-assembled matter as an uncured material. While the uncured binder may be suitable for temporary situations, it is expected that the binder will be cured. In one embodiment, the method of binding loosely or non-assembled matter includes curing the dehydrated reactive mixture. In one embodiment, the curing step includes heating the dehydrated reactive mixture to temperatures of from about 150° C. [˜300° F.] to about 315° C. [˜600° F.]. Illustratively, the curing step includes heating the dehydrated reactive mixture to about 175° C. [˜350° F.]. Illustratively, the loosely or non-assembled matter may comprise a collection of mineral fibers (e.g., glass, rock wool). In illustrative embodiments, the method of binding loosely or non-assembled matter results in a binder which has a shell bone longitudinal tensile strength test result average for a weathered and a dry sample exceeds about 1.8 MN/m2 and 2.3 MN/m2 respectively.


In illustrative embodiments, a composite melanoidin and polyester binder comprises products of multiple reactions. First, melanoidin products may form as the result of the reaction between the nitrogeneous components of the molasses and the carbohydrate components of the molasses. This reaction may be catalyzed by and incorporate portions of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid. The melanoidins which form will have pendant hydroxyl groups derived from the carbohydrate and may undergo esterification reactions with other melanoidin products, with the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and/or with the monomeric polycarboxylic acid. This reaction may be catalyzed by an alkali metal polyphosphate. Additionally, the carbohydrate portion of the molasses may undergo an esterification reaction with either the monomeric or polymeric polycarboxylic acid catalyzed by the alkali metal polyphosphate.


For example, amine functional compounds from the molasses may react with reducing sugars from the molasses under influence of citric acid to form melanoidin products. Furthermore, the melanoidin products may be cross-linked by an esterification reaction with the polyacrylic acid and/or a citric acid under catalysis from sodium hypophophite. Concurrently, a reaction between sugars in the molasses and the polyacrylic acid and/or citric acid could also occur under catalysis of sodium hypophosphite. In one embodiment, the ratio of the copolymer of polymeric polyacrylic acid to the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.25 to about 1.5 by weight. In another embodiment, the polymeric polyacrylic acid has a molecular weight of about 2000 to about 6000 g/mol. In yet another embodiment, the binder includes less than about 2% Nitrogen as determined by elemental analysis. In one embodiment, the solution of the molasses with the polymeric polyacrylic acid and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid in the presence of the sodium hypophosphite catalyst has a pH from about 6 to about 11. In yet another embodiment, an aqueous extraction of the binder has a pH from about 3 to about 7.


Testing Procedures


When evaluated for their dry and weathered tensile strength, glass bead-containing shell bone compositions prepared with a given binder provide an indication of the likely tensile strength and the likely durability, respectively, of fiberglass insulation prepared with that particular binder. Predicted durability is based on a shell bone's weathered tensile strength: dry tensile strength ratio. Shell bones were prepared, weathered, and tested as follows:


Preparation Procedure for Shell Bones: A shell bone mold (Dietert Foundry Testing Equipment; Heated Shell Curing Accessory, Model 366, and Shell Mold Accessory) was set to a desired temperature, generally 200° C. [˜390° F.], and allowed to heat up for at least one hour. While the shell bone mold was heating, 60 g of an aqueous ammonium polycarboxylate-molasses binder (30% in binder solids) was prepared as described in the examples set forth herein. Using a large glass beaker, 582.0 g of glass beads (Quality Ballotini Impact Beads, Spec. AD, US Sieve 70-140, 106-212 micron-#7, from Potters Industries, Inc.) were weighed by difference. The glass beads were poured into a clean and dry mixing bowl, which bowl was mounted onto an electric mixer stand. Exactly 60 g of aqueous binder were obtained, and the binder then poured slowly into the glass beads in the mixing bowl. The electric mixer was then turned on and the glass beads/ammonium polycarboxylate-sugar binder mixture was agitated for one minute. Using a large spatula, the sides of the whisk (mixer) were scraped to remove any clumps of binder, while also scraping the edges wherein the glass beads lay in the bottom of the bowl. The mixer was then turned back on for an additional minute, then the whisk (mixer) was removed from the unit, followed by removal of the mixing bowl containing the glass beads/binder mixture. Using a large spatula, as much of the binder and glass beads attached to the whisk (mixer) as possible were removed and then stirred into the glass beads/binder mixture in the mixing bowl. The sides of the bowl were then scraped to mix in any excess binder that might have accumulated on the sides. At this point, the glass beads/binder mixture was ready for molding in a shell bone mold.


The slides of the shell bone mold were confirmed to be aligned within the bottom mold platen. Using a large spatula, a glass beads/binder mixture was then quickly added into the three mold cavities within the shell bone mold. The surface of the mixture in each cavity was flattened out, while scraping off the excess mixture to give a uniform surface area to the shell bone. Any inconsistencies or gaps that existed in any of the cavities were filled in with additional glass beads/ammonium polycarboxylate-sugar binder mixture and then flattened out. Once a glass beads/binder mixture was placed into the shell bone cavities, and the mixture was exposed to heat, curing began. As manipulation time can affect test results, e.g., shell bones with two differentially cured layers can be produced, shell bones were prepared consistently and rapidly. With the shell bone mold filled, the top platen was quickly placed onto the bottom platen. At the same time, or quickly thereafter, measurement of curing time was initiated by means of a stopwatch, during which curing the temperature of the bottom platen ranged from about 160° C. [˜320° F.] to about 180° C. [˜355° F.], while the temperature of the top platen ranged from about 200° C. [˜390° F.] to about 230° C. [˜445° F.]. At seven minutes elapsed time, the top platen was removed and the slides pulled out so that all three shell bones could be removed. The freshly made shell bones were then placed on a wire rack, adjacent to the shell bone mold platen, and allowed to cool to room temperature. Thereafter, each shell bone was labeled, half were placed in a dessicator and the other half in a humidity cabinet at 55° C. [˜130° F.]. All shell bones were tested the day after they were prepared.


Conditioning (Weathering) Procedure for Shell Bones: A Blue M humidity chamber was turned on and then set to provide weathering conditions of 55° C. [˜130° F.] and 95% relative humidity (i.e., 55° C./95% rH). The water tank on the side of the humidity chamber was checked and filled regularly, usually each time it was turned on. The humidity chamber was allowed to reach the specified weathering conditions over a period of at least 4 hours, with a day-long equilibration period being typical. Shell bones to be weathered were loaded quickly (since while the doors are open both the humidity and the temperature decrease), one at a time through the open humidity chamber doors, onto the upper, slotted shelf of the humidity chamber. The time that the shell bones were placed in the humidity chamber was noted, and weathering conducted for a period of 12 hours. Thereafter, the humidity chamber doors were opened and one set of shell bones at a time were removed and placed individually on a wire rack and left to cool. Weathered shell bones were immediately taken to the Instron room and tested.


Test Procedure for Breaking Shell Bones: In the Instron room, the shell bone test method was loaded on the 5500 R Instron machine while ensuring that the proper load cell was installed (i.e., Static Load Cell 1 kN), and the machine allowed to warm up for fifteen minutes. During this period of time, shell bone testing grips were verified as being installed on the machine. The load cell was zeroed and balanced, and then one set of shell bones was tested at a time as follows: A shell bone was removed from its plastic storage bag and then weighed. The weight (in grams) was then entered into the computer associated with the Instron machine. The measured thickness of the shell bone (in inches) was then entered, as specimen thickness, three times into the computer associated with the Instron machine. A shell bone specimen was then placed into the grips on the Instron machine, and testing initiated via the keypad on the Instron machine. After removing a shell bone specimen, the measured breaking point was entered into the computer associated with the Instron machine, and testing continued until all shell bones in a set were tested.


Referring now to FIG. 1, shown are the shell bone longitudinal tensile strength test results for comparative samples 1-2, examples 1-12, and a reference sample. Each binder was prepared according to the following procedure:


Molasses (70 g), powdered anhydrous citric acid (20 g), and SOKALAN (BASF) (10 g) were combined in a 1-L beaker. Soft water was then added to achieve a volume of 450 mL and the resulting mixture was stirred to achieve complete dissolution of solids. To this solution, sodium hypophosphite (7.5 g) and a silane (Fluorochem, ISI 0200) (0.3 g) was added with sufficient water to bring the total volume to 500 mL. The solution was stirred for several minutes before being used as described herein for shell-bone testing. The composition and shell bone longitudinal tensile strength test result averages for of weathered and dry samples (MN/m2) for comparative example 1-4 and examples 1-10 are shown in Table 1. Column A is the molasses component, column B is the monomeric polycarboxylic acid component, column C is the polymeric polyacrylic acid component and column D is the catalyst. The values in column A-C are weight ratio based on total binder weight (i.e. A/[A+B+C]). The values in column D are the weight ratio of catalyst to binder (D/[A+B+C]).


Referring again to FIG. 1, the reference composition is comprised of a melanoidin-type binder composition which has gained acceptance as a commercially viable binder for a wide range of insulation products. The composition of this sample matches that disclosed in U.S. Published Application No. 2005/0027283. Because the reference composition is regarded as a commercially successful product, it was used as a baseline from which to compare the performance characteristics of the exemplary compositions 1-10. It is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art that suitable performance in shell-bone testing is highly correlative to suitable performance in binding any number of types of loosely assembled or non-assembled matter, specifically cellulosic and mineral fibers.


Test results are shown in Table 1 which results are mean dry tensile strength (MN/m2) and mean weathered tensile strength (MN/m2).









TABLE 1







The composition and shell bone longitudinal tensile strength


test result averages for of weathered and dry samples (MN/m2)


for comparative example 1-4 and examples 1-10. Column A is the


molasses component, column B is the monomeric polycarboxylic


acid component, column C is the polymeric polyacrylic acid component


and column D is the catalyst. The values in column A-C are weight


ratio based on total binder weight (i.e. A/[A + B +


C]). The values in column D are the weight ratio of catalyst


to binder (D/[A + B + C]).















A
B
C
D
Dry
Weathered
Loss/%


















Comparative
0.6
0.4
0
0.075
1.744
0.528
69.73


Example 1


Comparative
0.5
0.5
0
0.075
1.386
0.654
52.84


Example 2


Example 1
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.05
2.612
1.483
43.21


Example 2
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.05
2.239
1.49
33.45


Example 3
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.05
2.591
1.731
33.21


Example 4
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.025
3.181
1.574
50.5


Comparative
0.6
0.4
0
0.05
1.754
1.086
38.12


Example 3


Comparative
0.4
0.6
0
0.05
1.213
0.615
49.29


Example 4


Example 5
0.4
0
0.6
0.05
3.53
1.832
48.11


Example 6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.05
1.918
1.593
16.96


Example 7
0.6
0.35
0.033
0.075
1.493
0.786
47.39


Example 8
0.6
0.3
0.067
0.075
1.644
0.978
40.48


Example 9
0.6
0.2
0.134
0.075
2.432
1.598
34.29


Example 10
0.5
0.4
0.067
0.075
1.611
0.913
43.29


Reference




2.341
1.518
35.17


Composition








Claims
  • 1. A fiber product manufactured from a collection of non- or loosely assembled matter by a method comprising: providing an aqueous binder comprisingcarbohydrates having a dextrose equivalent of about 5 to about 100,a monomeric polycarboxylic acid, anda polymeric polycarboxylic acid;disposing the aqueous binder on a collection of matter; anddrying the aqueous binder to form an uncured binder and thermally curing the uncured binder to form the collection of matter bound with a cured, thermoset binder.
  • 2. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the carbohydrates comprise dextrins.
  • 3. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the carbohydrates comprise low molecular-weight carbohydrates.
  • 4. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the polymeric polycarboxylic acid is selected from a group consisting of a polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, copolymers thereof, and mixtures thereof.
  • 5. The fiber product of claim 4, wherein the polymeric polycarboxylic acid has a molecular weight of about 2000 g/mol to about 6000 g/mol.
  • 6. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is selected from a group consisting of citric acid, maleic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • 7. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the aqueous binder further comprises a catalyst selected from a group consisting of an alkali metal polyphosphate, an alkali metal dihydrogen phosphate, a polyphosphoric acid, an alkyl phosphinic acid, and an oligomer or a polymer bearing phosphorous-containing groups and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The fiber product of claim 7, wherein the catalyst is sodium hypophosphite.
  • 9. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the collection of matter comprises mineral fibers selected from a group consisting of glass fibers and rock wool fibers.
  • 10. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the cured binder includes between about 0.02% and about 2% nitrogen as determined by elemental analysis.
  • 11. The fiber product of claim 1, in which the cured, thermoset binder is formaldehyde free.
  • 12. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the aqueous binder is disposed on the collection of matter by spraying.
  • 13. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the fiber product is a mineral wool insulation product.
  • 14. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the aqueous binder further comprises a material selected from the group consisting of a silicon-containing compound, gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane, aminoethylaminopropyltrimethoxysilane, an amino-substituted silane and mixtures thereof.
  • 15. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the curing includes heating at a temperature from about 150° C. to about 315° C.
  • 16. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the cured, thermoset binder is a composite melanoidin polyester binder.
  • 17. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein the aqueous binder comprises no more than 50% by dry weight of the uncured binder of a combination of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid.
  • 18. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.25 to about 1.5 by weight.
  • 19. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the carbohydrates to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.5 to about 0.9 by weight.
  • 20. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the carbohydrates to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.4 to about 0.8 by weight.
  • 21. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the carbohydrates to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.4 or more by weight.
  • 22. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the carbohydrates to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.9 or less by weight.
  • 23. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.01 to about 0.4 by weight.
  • 24. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.033 to about 0.6 by weight.
  • 25. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.01 or more by weight.
  • 26. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the polymeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.6 or less by weight.
  • 27. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is from about 0.05 to about 0.4 by weight.
  • 28. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.05 or more by weight.
  • 29. The fiber product of claim 1, wherein in the aqueous binder the ratio of the monomeric polycarboxylic acid to the combination of the carbohydrates, the polymeric polycarboxylic acid, and the monomeric polycarboxylic acid is 0.4 or less by weight.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/534,806, filed Nov. 6, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/388,408, filed Feb. 1, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,900,495), which is the U. S. national phase of PCT/IB2010/001996, filed Aug. 9, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/232,255, filed Aug. 7, 2009, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (466)
Number Name Date Kind
1801052 Meigs Apr 1931 A
1801053 Meigs Apr 1931 A
1886353 Novotny Nov 1932 A
1902948 Castle Mar 1933 A
1964263 Krenke Jun 1934 A
2198874 Leighton Apr 1940 A
2215825 Wallace Sep 1940 A
2261295 Schlack Nov 1941 A
2362086 Eastes Nov 1944 A
2371990 Hanford Mar 1945 A
2392105 Sussman Jan 1946 A
2442989 Sussman Jun 1948 A
2500665 Courtright Mar 1950 A
2518956 Sussman Aug 1950 A
2875073 Gogek Feb 1959 A
2894920 Ramos Jul 1959 A
2965504 Gogek Dec 1960 A
3038462 Bohdan Jun 1962 A
3138473 Floyd Jun 1964 A
3222243 Gaston Dec 1965 A
3231349 Stalego Jan 1966 A
3232821 Banks Feb 1966 A
3297419 Eyre, Jr. Jan 1967 A
3513001 Woodhead May 1970 A
3551365 Matalon Dec 1970 A
3784408 Jaffe Jan 1974 A
3791807 Etzel Feb 1974 A
3802897 Bovier Apr 1974 A
3809664 Burr May 1974 A
3826767 Hoover Jul 1974 A
3856606 Fan Dec 1974 A
3867119 Takeo Feb 1975 A
3907724 Higginbottom Sep 1975 A
3911048 Nistri Oct 1975 A
3919134 Higginbottom Nov 1975 A
3922466 Bell Nov 1975 A
3955031 Jones May 1976 A
3956204 Higginbottom May 1976 A
3961081 McKenzie Jun 1976 A
3971807 Brack Jul 1976 A
4014726 Fargo Mar 1977 A
4028290 Reid Jun 1977 A
4048127 Gibbons Sep 1977 A
4054713 Sakaguchi Oct 1977 A
4085076 Gibbons Apr 1978 A
4097427 Aitken Jun 1978 A
4107379 Stofko Aug 1978 A
4109057 Nakamura Aug 1978 A
4144027 Habib Mar 1979 A
4148765 Nelson Apr 1979 A
4183997 Stofko Jan 1980 A
4184986 Krasnobajew Jan 1980 A
4186053 Krasnobajew Jan 1980 A
4201247 Shannon May 1980 A
4201857 Krasnobajew May 1980 A
4217414 Walon Aug 1980 A
4233432 Curtis, Jr. Nov 1980 A
4246367 Curtis, Jr. Jan 1981 A
4259190 Fahey Mar 1981 A
4265963 Matalon May 1981 A
4278573 Tessler Jul 1981 A
4296173 Fahey Oct 1981 A
4301310 Wagner Nov 1981 A
4310585 Shannon Jan 1982 A
4322523 Wagner Mar 1982 A
4330443 Rankin May 1982 A
4333484 Keritsis Jun 1982 A
4357194 Stofko Nov 1982 A
4361588 Herz Nov 1982 A
4379101 Smith Apr 1983 A
4393019 Geimer Jul 1983 A
4396430 Matalon Aug 1983 A
4400496 Butler Aug 1983 A
4464523 Neigel Aug 1984 A
4506684 Keritsis Mar 1985 A
4520143 Jellinek May 1985 A
4524164 Viswanathan Jun 1985 A
4631226 Jellinek Dec 1986 A
4654259 Stofko Mar 1987 A
4668716 Pepe May 1987 A
4692478 Viswanathan Sep 1987 A
4714727 Hume, III Dec 1987 A
4720295 Bronshtein Jan 1988 A
4754056 Ansel Jun 1988 A
4761184 Markessini Aug 1988 A
4780339 Lacourse Oct 1988 A
4828643 Newman May 1989 A
4845162 Schmitt Jul 1989 A
4906237 Johansson Mar 1990 A
4912147 Pfoehler Mar 1990 A
4918861 Carpenter Apr 1990 A
4923980 Blomberg May 1990 A
4950444 Deboufie Aug 1990 A
4988780 Das Jan 1991 A
4992519 Mukherjee Feb 1991 A
5001202 Denis Mar 1991 A
5013405 Izard May 1991 A
5037930 Shih Aug 1991 A
5041595 Yang Aug 1991 A
5089342 Dhein Feb 1992 A
5095054 Lay Mar 1992 A
5106615 Dikstein Apr 1992 A
5114004 Isono May 1992 A
5123949 Thiessen Jun 1992 A
5124369 Vandichel Jun 1992 A
5128407 Layton Jul 1992 A
5143582 Arkens Sep 1992 A
5151465 Le-Khac Sep 1992 A
5167738 Bichot Dec 1992 A
5198492 Stack Mar 1993 A
5217741 Kawachi Jun 1993 A
5218048 Abe Jun 1993 A
5240498 Matalon Aug 1993 A
5278222 Stack Jan 1994 A
5300144 Adams Apr 1994 A
5300192 Hansen Apr 1994 A
5308896 Hansen May 1994 A
5318990 Strauss Jun 1994 A
5336753 Jung Aug 1994 A
5336755 Pape Aug 1994 A
5336766 Koga Aug 1994 A
5340868 Strauss Aug 1994 A
5352480 Hansen Oct 1994 A
5371194 Ferretti Dec 1994 A
5387665 Misawa Feb 1995 A
5389716 Graves Feb 1995 A
5393849 Srinivasan Feb 1995 A
5416139 Zeiszler May 1995 A
5421838 Gosset Jun 1995 A
5424418 Duflot Jun 1995 A
5434233 Kiely Jul 1995 A
5447977 Hansen Sep 1995 A
5470843 Stahl Nov 1995 A
5480973 Goodlad Jan 1996 A
5492756 Seale Feb 1996 A
5498662 Tanaka Mar 1996 A
5503920 Alkire Apr 1996 A
5534612 Taylor Jul 1996 A
5536766 Seyffer Jul 1996 A
5538783 Hansen Jul 1996 A
5543215 Hansen Aug 1996 A
5545279 Hall Aug 1996 A
5547541 Hansen Aug 1996 A
5547745 Hansen Aug 1996 A
5550189 Qin Aug 1996 A
5554730 Woiszwillo Sep 1996 A
5562740 Cook Oct 1996 A
5571618 Hansen Nov 1996 A
5578678 Hartmann Nov 1996 A
5580856 Prestrelski Dec 1996 A
5582682 Ferretti Dec 1996 A
5583193 Aravindakshan Dec 1996 A
5589256 Hansen Dec 1996 A
5589536 Golino Dec 1996 A
5607759 Hansen Mar 1997 A
5608011 Eck Mar 1997 A
5609727 Hansen Mar 1997 A
5614570 Hansen Mar 1997 A
5620940 Birbara Apr 1997 A
5621026 Tanaka Apr 1997 A
5633298 Arfaei May 1997 A
5641561 Hansen Jun 1997 A
5643978 Darwin Jul 1997 A
5645756 Dubin Jul 1997 A
5660904 Andersen Aug 1997 A
5661213 Arkens Aug 1997 A
5670585 Taylor Sep 1997 A
5672418 Hansen Sep 1997 A
5672659 Shalaby Sep 1997 A
5690715 Schiwek Nov 1997 A
5691060 Levy Nov 1997 A
5693411 Hansen Dec 1997 A
5719092 Arrington Feb 1998 A
5719228 Taylor Feb 1998 A
5756580 Natori May 1998 A
5763524 Arkens Jun 1998 A
5788243 Harshaw Aug 1998 A
5788423 Perkins Aug 1998 A
5807364 Hansen Sep 1998 A
5855987 Margel Jan 1999 A
5863985 Shalaby Jan 1999 A
5885337 Nohr Mar 1999 A
5895804 Lee Apr 1999 A
5905115 Luitjes May 1999 A
5916503 Rettenbacher Jun 1999 A
5919528 Huijs Jul 1999 A
5919831 Philipp Jul 1999 A
5922403 Tecle Jul 1999 A
5925722 Exner Jul 1999 A
5929184 Holmes-Farley Jul 1999 A
5929196 Kissel Jul 1999 A
5932344 Ikemoto Aug 1999 A
5932665 Deporter Aug 1999 A
5932689 Arkens Aug 1999 A
5942123 McArdle Aug 1999 A
5954869 Elfersy Sep 1999 A
5977224 Cheung Nov 1999 A
5977232 Arkens Nov 1999 A
5981719 Woiszwillo Nov 1999 A
5983586 Berdan, II Nov 1999 A
5990216 Cai Nov 1999 A
5993709 Bonomo Nov 1999 A
6022615 Rettenbacher Feb 2000 A
6067821 Jackson May 2000 A
6071549 Hansen Jun 2000 A
6071994 Hummerich Jun 2000 A
6072086 James Jun 2000 A
6077883 Taylor Jun 2000 A
6090925 Woiszwillo Jul 2000 A
6114033 Ikemoto Sep 2000 A
6114464 Reck Sep 2000 A
6133347 Vickers, Jr. Oct 2000 A
6136916 Arkens Oct 2000 A
6139619 Zaretskiy Oct 2000 A
6143243 Gershun Nov 2000 A
6171444 Nigam Jan 2001 B1
6171654 Salsman Jan 2001 B1
6180037 Andersen Jan 2001 B1
6194512 Chen Feb 2001 B1
6210472 Kwan Apr 2001 B1
6221958 Shalaby Apr 2001 B1
6221973 Arkens Apr 2001 B1
6231721 Quick May 2001 B1
6274661 Chen Aug 2001 B1
6281298 Papsin, Jr. Aug 2001 B1
6299677 Johnson Oct 2001 B1
6299936 Reck Oct 2001 B1
6307732 Tsubaki Oct 2001 B1
6310227 Sarama Oct 2001 B1
6313102 Colaco Nov 2001 B1
6319683 James Nov 2001 B1
6331350 Taylor Dec 2001 B1
6331513 Zaid Dec 2001 B1
6340411 Hansen Jan 2002 B1
6348530 Reck Feb 2002 B1
6365079 Winkler Apr 2002 B1
6372077 Tecle Apr 2002 B1
6379739 Formanek Apr 2002 B1
6395856 Petty May 2002 B1
6403665 Sieker Jun 2002 B1
6407225 Mang Jun 2002 B1
6410036 De Rosa Jun 2002 B1
6440204 Rogols Aug 2002 B1
6461553 Hansen Oct 2002 B1
6468442 Bytnar Oct 2002 B2
6468730 Fujiwara Oct 2002 B2
6469120 Elfersy Oct 2002 B1
6475552 Shah Nov 2002 B1
6482875 Lorenz Nov 2002 B2
6495656 Haile Dec 2002 B1
6521339 Hansen Feb 2003 B1
6525009 Sachdev Feb 2003 B2
6538057 Wildburg Mar 2003 B1
6547867 Rogols Apr 2003 B2
6555616 Helbing Apr 2003 B1
6559302 Shah May 2003 B1
6562267 Hansen May 2003 B1
6596103 Hansen Jul 2003 B1
6613378 Erhan Sep 2003 B1
6638882 Helbing Oct 2003 B1
6638884 Quick Oct 2003 B2
6699945 Chen Mar 2004 B1
6706853 Stanssens Mar 2004 B1
6719862 Quick Apr 2004 B2
6730730 Hansen May 2004 B1
6753361 Kroner Jun 2004 B2
6818694 Hindi Nov 2004 B2
6821547 Shah Nov 2004 B2
6852247 Bytnar Feb 2005 B2
6858074 Anderson Feb 2005 B2
6861495 Barsotti Mar 2005 B2
6864044 Ishikawa Mar 2005 B2
6878800 Husemoen Apr 2005 B2
6884849 Chen Apr 2005 B2
6955844 Tagge Oct 2005 B2
6962714 Hei Nov 2005 B2
6989171 Portman Jan 2006 B2
6992203 Trusovs Jan 2006 B2
7018490 Hansen Mar 2006 B2
7029717 Ojima Apr 2006 B1
7067579 Taylor Jun 2006 B2
7083831 Koch Aug 2006 B1
7090745 Beckman Aug 2006 B2
7141626 Rodrigues Nov 2006 B2
7144474 Hansen Dec 2006 B1
7195792 Boston Mar 2007 B2
7201778 Smith Apr 2007 B2
7201825 Dezutter Apr 2007 B2
7202326 Kuroda Apr 2007 B2
7241487 Taylor Jul 2007 B2
7458235 Beaufils Dec 2008 B2
7514027 Horres Apr 2009 B2
7655711 Swift Feb 2010 B2
7772347 Swift Aug 2010 B2
7795354 Srinivasan Sep 2010 B2
7803879 Srinivasan Sep 2010 B2
7807771 Swift Oct 2010 B2
7842382 Helbing Nov 2010 B2
7854980 Jackson Dec 2010 B2
7883693 Sehl Feb 2011 B2
7888445 Swift Feb 2011 B2
7947765 Swift May 2011 B2
8114210 Hampson Feb 2012 B2
8182648 Swift May 2012 B2
8211923 Wagner Jul 2012 B2
8372900 Shooshtari Feb 2013 B2
8377564 Shooshtari Feb 2013 B2
8501838 Jackson Aug 2013 B2
8680224 Zhang Mar 2014 B2
8691934 Helbing Apr 2014 B2
8900495 Pacorel Dec 2014 B2
9416248 Pacorel Aug 2016 B2
20010017427 Rosthauser Aug 2001 A1
20010046824 Nigam Nov 2001 A1
20020000100 Burg Jan 2002 A1
20020025435 Hansen Feb 2002 A1
20020026025 Kuo Feb 2002 A1
20020028857 Holy Mar 2002 A1
20020032253 Lorenz Mar 2002 A1
20020042473 Trollsas Apr 2002 A1
20020091185 Taylor Jul 2002 A1
20020096278 Foster Jul 2002 A1
20020123598 Sieker Sep 2002 A1
20020130439 Kroner Sep 2002 A1
20020161108 Schultz Oct 2002 A1
20020197352 Portman Dec 2002 A1
20030005857 Minami Jan 2003 A1
20030040239 Toas Feb 2003 A1
20030044513 Shah Mar 2003 A1
20030066523 Lewis Apr 2003 A1
20030071879 Swenson Apr 2003 A1
20030116294 Kehrer Jun 2003 A1
20030134945 Capps Jul 2003 A1
20030148084 Trocino Aug 2003 A1
20030153690 Husemoen Aug 2003 A1
20030185991 Wigger Oct 2003 A1
20030203117 Bartkowiak Oct 2003 A1
20040002567 Chen Jan 2004 A1
20040019168 Soerens Jan 2004 A1
20040024170 Husemoen Feb 2004 A1
20040033269 Hei Feb 2004 A1
20040033747 Miller Feb 2004 A1
20040034154 Tutin Feb 2004 A1
20040038017 Tutin Feb 2004 A1
20040048531 Belmares Mar 2004 A1
20040077055 Fosdick Apr 2004 A1
20040079499 Dezutter Apr 2004 A1
20040087024 Bellocq May 2004 A1
20040087719 Rautschek May 2004 A1
20040122166 O'Brien-Bernini Jun 2004 A1
20040131874 Tutin Jul 2004 A1
20040144706 Beaufils Jul 2004 A1
20040152824 Dobrowolski Aug 2004 A1
20040161993 Tripp Aug 2004 A1
20040209851 Nelson Oct 2004 A1
20040213930 Halabisky Oct 2004 A1
20040220368 Li Nov 2004 A1
20040249066 Heinzman Dec 2004 A1
20040254285 Rodrigues Dec 2004 A1
20040260082 Van Der Wilden Dec 2004 A1
20050001198 Bytnar Jan 2005 A1
20050017394 Hochsmann Jan 2005 A1
20050027283 Richard Feb 2005 A1
20050033037 Trusovs Feb 2005 A1
20050048212 Clamen Mar 2005 A1
20050059770 Srinivasan Mar 2005 A1
20050171085 Pinto Aug 2005 A1
20050196421 Hunter Sep 2005 A1
20050202224 Helbing Sep 2005 A1
20050208852 Weber Sep 2005 A1
20050215153 Cossement Sep 2005 A1
20050245669 Clungeon Nov 2005 A1
20050275133 Cabell Dec 2005 A1
20050288479 Kuroda Dec 2005 A1
20060005580 Espiard Jan 2006 A1
20060044302 Chen Mar 2006 A1
20060099870 Garcia May 2006 A1
20060111480 Hansen May 2006 A1
20060124538 Morcrette Jun 2006 A1
20060135433 Murray Jun 2006 A1
20060141177 Ligtenberg Jun 2006 A1
20060179892 Horres Aug 2006 A1
20060188465 Perrier Aug 2006 A1
20060198954 Frechem Sep 2006 A1
20060231487 Bartley Oct 2006 A1
20060252855 Pisanova Nov 2006 A1
20060281622 Maricourt Dec 2006 A1
20070006390 Clamen Jan 2007 A1
20070009582 Madsen Jan 2007 A1
20070027281 Michl Feb 2007 A1
20070039520 Crews Feb 2007 A1
20070082983 Crews Apr 2007 A1
20070123679 Swift May 2007 A1
20070123680 Swift May 2007 A1
20070129522 Burckhardt Jun 2007 A1
20070142596 Swift Jun 2007 A1
20070158022 Heep Jul 2007 A1
20070184740 Keller Aug 2007 A1
20070191574 Miller Aug 2007 A1
20070270070 Othman Nov 2007 A1
20070287018 Tutin Dec 2007 A1
20070292618 Srinivasan Dec 2007 A1
20070292619 Srinivasan Dec 2007 A1
20070298274 Eriksson Dec 2007 A1
20080009209 Clamen Jan 2008 A1
20080009616 Frank Jan 2008 A1
20080051539 Kelly Feb 2008 A1
20080060551 Crews Mar 2008 A1
20080081138 Moore Apr 2008 A1
20080108741 Van Herwijnen May 2008 A1
20080160260 Wada Jul 2008 A1
20080160302 Asrar Jul 2008 A1
20080194738 Crews Aug 2008 A1
20090169867 Kelly Jul 2009 A1
20090170978 Kelly Jul 2009 A1
20090227732 Glockner Sep 2009 A1
20090301972 Hines Dec 2009 A1
20090304919 Huenig Dec 2009 A1
20090306255 Patel Dec 2009 A1
20090324915 Swift Dec 2009 A1
20100029160 Srinivasan Feb 2010 A1
20100058661 Jackson Mar 2010 A1
20100080976 Jackson Apr 2010 A1
20100084598 Jackson Apr 2010 A1
20100086726 Jackson Apr 2010 A1
20100087571 Jackson Apr 2010 A1
20100098947 Inoue Apr 2010 A1
20100117023 Dopico May 2010 A1
20100129640 Kelly May 2010 A1
20100130649 Swift May 2010 A1
20100175826 Huenig Jul 2010 A1
20100210595 Wagner Aug 2010 A1
20100222463 Brady Sep 2010 A1
20100222566 Fosdick Sep 2010 A1
20100282996 Jaffrennou Nov 2010 A1
20100301256 Hampson Dec 2010 A1
20100320113 Swift Dec 2010 A1
20110021672 Crews Jan 2011 A1
20110039111 Shooshtari Feb 2011 A1
20110040010 Shooshtari Feb 2011 A1
20110042303 Shooshtari Feb 2011 A1
20110045966 Shooshtari Feb 2011 A1
20110089074 Jackson Apr 2011 A1
20110135937 Swift Jun 2011 A1
20110190425 Swift Aug 2011 A1
20110220835 Swift Sep 2011 A1
20110256790 Toas Oct 2011 A1
20110260094 Hampson Oct 2011 A1
20110262648 Lee Oct 2011 A1
20110263757 Rand Oct 2011 A1
20110306726 Bailey Dec 2011 A1
20120133073 Pacorel May 2012 A1
20120156954 Eckert Jun 2012 A1
20130029150 Appley Jan 2013 A1
20130032749 Jaffrennou Feb 2013 A1
20130047888 Mueller Feb 2013 A1
20130059075 Appley Mar 2013 A1
20130082205 Mueller Apr 2013 A1
20130174758 Mueller Jul 2013 A1
20130234362 Swift Sep 2013 A1
20130236650 Swift Sep 2013 A1
20130237113 Swift Sep 2013 A1
20130244524 Swift Sep 2013 A1
20140091247 Jackson Apr 2014 A1
20140134909 Guo May 2014 A1
20140357787 Jobber Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (115)
Number Date Country
8538765 Aug 1985 AU
9640921 Jul 1997 AU
1090026 Nov 1980 CA
2037214 Sep 1991 CA
2232334 Nov 1998 CA
2458333 Dec 1999 CA
2278946 Jan 2000 CA
2470783 Dec 2004 CA
1251738 May 2000 CN
1905054 Aug 1969 DE
4142261 Jun 1993 DE
4233622 Apr 1994 DE
4308089 Sep 1994 DE
102004033561 Sep 2005 DE
102005023431 Nov 2006 DE
0044614 Jan 1982 EP
0099801 Feb 1984 EP
354023 Feb 1990 EP
0461995 Dec 1991 EP
0524518 Jan 1993 EP
0547819 Jun 1993 EP
0583086 Feb 1994 EP
0714754 Jun 1996 EP
796681 Sep 1997 EP
0826710 Mar 1998 EP
856494 Aug 1998 EP
0873976 Oct 1998 EP
878135 Nov 1998 EP
0882756 Dec 1998 EP
0911361 Apr 1999 EP
915811 May 1999 EP
936060 Aug 1999 EP
976866 Feb 2000 EP
0990729 Apr 2000 EP
1038433 Sep 2000 EP
1193288 Apr 2002 EP
1084167 Sep 2002 EP
1268702 Jan 2003 EP
1382642 Jan 2004 EP
1486547 Dec 2004 EP
1522642 Apr 2005 EP
1698598 Sep 2006 EP
1767566 Apr 2007 EP
2223941 Sep 2010 EP
2253663 Nov 2010 EP
2614388 Oct 1988 FR
2924719 Jun 2009 FR
809675 Mar 1959 GB
926749 May 1963 GB
1391172 Apr 1975 GB
1469331 Apr 1977 GB
1512066 May 1978 GB
1525541 Sep 1978 GB
2047258 Nov 1980 GB
2078805 Jan 1982 GB
2173523 Oct 1986 GB
2251438 Jul 1992 GB
53113784 Oct 1978 JP
57101100 Jun 1982 JP
5811193 Jan 1983 JP
61195647 Aug 1986 JP
3-173680 Jul 1991 JP
05186635 Jul 1993 JP
7-034023 Feb 1995 JP
09157627 Jun 1997 JP
10234314 Sep 1998 JP
11035491 Feb 1999 JP
11181690 Jul 1999 JP
2000327841 Nov 2000 JP
2002293576 Sep 2002 JP
2003147276 May 2003 JP
2003238921 Aug 2003 JP
2004060058 Feb 2004 JP
2005306919 Nov 2005 JP
549563 Jan 2008 NZ
1765996 Aug 1995 RU
374400 Mar 1973 SU
1990007541 Jul 1990 WO
1992012198 Jul 1992 WO
1995034517 Dec 1995 WO
1997049646 Dec 1997 WO
1999036368 Jul 1999 WO
199947765 Sep 1999 WO
199960042 Nov 1999 WO
199960043 Nov 1999 WO
200058085 Oct 2000 WO
2001014491 Mar 2001 WO
2001059026 Aug 2001 WO
200200429 Jan 2002 WO
2003029496 Apr 2003 WO
2003071879 Sep 2003 WO
2003106561 Dec 2003 WO
2004076734 Sep 2004 WO
2005087837 Sep 2005 WO
2006044302 Apr 2006 WO
2006136614 Dec 2006 WO
2007014236 Feb 2007 WO
2007024020 Mar 2007 WO
2007050964 May 2007 WO
2007112335 Oct 2007 WO
2008089847 Jul 2008 WO
2008089851 Jul 2008 WO
2008141201 Nov 2008 WO
2009019235 Feb 2009 WO
2010139899 Dec 2010 WO
2011019590 Feb 2011 WO
2011019593 Feb 2011 WO
2011019597 Feb 2011 WO
2011019598 Feb 2011 WO
2011022224 Feb 2011 WO
2011022226 Feb 2011 WO
2011022227 Feb 2011 WO
2011138458 Nov 2011 WO
2011138459 Nov 2011 WO
2013150123 Oct 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (160)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/059730, completed Sep. 22, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/069046, completed Sep. 25, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/EP2008/060185, completed Oct. 23, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/057363, completed Sep. 5, 2011.
Ames, J.M., “The Maillard Browning Reaction—an Update,” Chemistry & Industry, No. 17, 1988, 4 pages.
“Gamma-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane,” Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002, 1 page.
Hodge, J.E., Chemistry of Browning Reactions in Model Systems, 1953, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 1, No. 15, pp. 928-943.
Agyei-Aye et al., “The Role of Anion in the Reaction of Reducing Sugars with Ammonium Salts,” Carbohydrate Research 2002, 337: 2273-2277.
Laroque et al., “Kinetic study on the Maillard reaction. Consideration of sugar reactivity,” Food Chemistry 2008, 111: 1032-1042.
Bjorksten et al., “Polyester Resin—Glass Fiber Laminates,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (1954).
Dow Corning, “A Guide to Silane Solutions,” 2005.
Knauf Data Sheet, 2006.
Molasses Corporation, United States Sugar Corporation, http://www.suga-lik.com/molasses/composition.html (Sep. 29, 2003).
Clamen, Guy, “Acrylic Thermosets: A Safe Alternative to Formaldehyde Resins,” Nonwovens World, Apr.-May 2004, pp. 96-102.
Opposition to AU 2006272595, Amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars, issued from Australian Patent Office, dated Jul. 6, 2012, 22 pages.
Decision re Opposition to AU 2006272595, issued from Australian Patent Office, dated Aug. 14, 2015, 25 pages.
Opposition to EP 1732968, Notice of Opposition: Prior Art, Scope of the Patent, Reasons for the Opposition, issued from European Patent Office, dated Mar. 8, 2012, 18 pages.
Decision re Opposition to EP 1732968, issued from the European Patent Office, dated Nov. 14, 2014, 5 pages.
Opposition to EA 019802, submitted to Eurasian Patent Office dated Dec. 26, 2014, 36 pages.
Decision re Opposition to EA 019802, issued by Eurasian Patent Office dated Aug. 18, 2015, 15 pages.
Owens Corning Retiree Update: What Goes Around, Comes Around: A tale of Natural Binders, revised Mar. 20, 2013 p. 4.
A.P. Bryant, “The Terminology of Sugars,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 26, No. 2, p. 231, Feb. 1934.
Food Flavor Chemistry, p. 162, Mar. 21, 2009 (English Abstract).
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,502 (9 pages)—dated Sep. 21, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,502 (9 pages)—dated Apr. 4, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (7 pages)—dated Aug. 6, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (9 pages)—dated Apr. 1, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (14 pages)—dated Nov. 12, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 10, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (10 pages)—dated Mar. 23, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (13 pages)—dated Oct. 5, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (7 pages)—dated Jun. 7, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (8 pages)—dated Jan. 29, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (7 pages)—dated Aug. 20, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Jun. 9, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Oct. 17, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 23, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (13 pages)—dated Jun. 21, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (13 pages)—dated Jun. 6, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (12 pages)—dated Dec. 17, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—dated Jul. 15, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—dated Mar. 23, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—dated Dec. 29, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,522 (4 pages)—dated Oct. 11, 2011.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,718 (5 pages)—dated Sep. 3, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,718 (6 pages)—dated Sep. 9, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (10 pages)—dated Oct. 7, 2011.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (10 pages)—dated May 10, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (9 pages)—dated Sep. 23, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,408 (5 pages)—dated Aug. 15, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (9 pages)—dated Dec. 20, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (6 pages)—dated Jul. 12, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (6 pages)—dated Aug. 12, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/637,794 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 12, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/637,794 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 26, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,439 (11 pages)—dated Jan. 8, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,452 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 13, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,452 (9 pages)—dated Oct. 27, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,144 (6 pages)—dated Jan. 10, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,144 (7 pages)—dated Jul. 29, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,818 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 26, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (16 pages)—dated Aug. 29, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (11 pages)—dated Apr. 16, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 21, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (14 pages)—dated Sep. 20, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (10 pages)—dated Apr. 25, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (8 pages)—dated Oct. 9, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (8 pages)—dated Sep. 25, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (23 pages)—dated Aug. 13, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (12 pages)—dated Apr. 15, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (8 pages)—dated Oct. 7, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (8 pages)—dated Jul. 16, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,238 (8 pages)—dated Jul. 16, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 10, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (6 pages)—dated Jul. 27, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 7, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 20, 2013.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,858 (8 pages)—dated May 11, 2011.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,542 (8 pages)—dated Dec. 26, 2012.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,542 (7 pages)—dated Feb. 10, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,394 (6 pages)—dated Aug. 14, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,556 (14 pages)—dated Nov. 20, 2014.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,556 (12 pages)—dated Sep. 17, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (17 pages)—dated Dec. 29, 2015.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (22 pages)—dated Sep. 2, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (21 pages)—dated Sep. 26, 2017.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/649,277 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 22, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,915 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 18, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/810,765 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 29, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/828,916 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 25, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,502 (9 pages)—dated Nov. 18, 2016.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/172,432 (16 pages)—dated Apr. 17, 2017.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,442 (17 pages)—dated May 19, 2017.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,159 (18 pages)—dated Mar. 2, 2017.
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/222,122 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 20, 2017.
Other Information—Narrative of verbal disclosure of Brian Swift (1 page)—May 13, 2014.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (52 pages, filed Jun. 12, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (58 pages, filed Jun. 12, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210).
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 (68 pages, filed Jun. 19, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 (62 pages, filed Nov. 2, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Decision of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 (33 pages)—Jan. 12, 2016.
Decision2 of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 (27 pages)—May 9, 2016.
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 based on 1st Petition (56 pages)—Jan. 11, 2017.
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 based on 2nd Petition (55 pages)—May 8, 2017.
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (61 pages, filed Jul. 1, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (70 pages, filed Jul. 1, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089).
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (56 pages, filed Jul. 10, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (67 pages, filed Jul. 10, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089).
3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (62 pages, filed Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (76 pages, filed Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089).
Declaration of Dr. Elam Leed (11 pages, filed Jul. 1, Jul. 10, and Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089, respectively).
Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Vickers (10 pages, filed Jul. 1, Jul. 10, and Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089, respectively).
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (60 pages, filed Jul. 29, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (72 pages, filed Jul. 29, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827).
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (51 pages, filed Aug. 5, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (65 pages, filed Aug. 5, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827).
3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (57 pages, filed Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.)
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (75 pages, filed Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827).
Declaration of Dr. Elam Leed (11 pages, filed Jul. 29, Aug. 5, and Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827, respectively).
Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Vickers (10 pages, filed Jul. 29, Aug. 5, and Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827, respectively).
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (20 pages)—Jul. 24, 2015.
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (23 pages)—Jul. 24, 2015.
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (31 pages)—Aug. 18, 2015.
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (4 pages)—Oct. 6, 2015.
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (4 pages)—Oct. 6, 2015.
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (4 pages)—Nov. 18, 2015.
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (8 pages)—Mar. 23, 2016.
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (8 pages)—Mar. 23, 2016.
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (8 pages)—Mar. 22, 2016.
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (17 pages)—Sep. 29, 2016.
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (18 pages)—Sep. 29, 2016.
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (22 pages)—Sep. 30, 2016.
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Consolidated Appeal of PTAB Decisions in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,888,445, 7,772,347 and 7,854,980 (5 pages)—Mar. 9, 2018.
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (34 pages)—May 1, 2015.
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (36 pages)—May 1, 2015.
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (25 pages)—Jul. 30, 2015.
Remand Order of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (5 pages)—Dec. 9, 2015.
Remand Order of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (5 pages)—Dec. 9, 2015.
Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner Response/Requester Comments after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (22 pages)—Oct. 17, 2016.
Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner Response/Requester Comments after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (17 pages)—Oct. 17, 2016.
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Opinion/Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (13 pages)—Feb. 27, 2017.
Final Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (25 pages)—Sep. 8, 2017.
Final Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (24 pages)—Sep. 8, 2017.
Decision of PTAB re Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (7 pages)—Feb. 12, 2018.
Decision of PTAB re Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (7 pages)—Feb. 12, 2018.
Decision of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (20 pages)—Oct. 21, 2015.
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (39 pages)—Oct. 19, 2016.
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decision in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (5 pages)—Jan. 16, 2018.
Decision1 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (16 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015.
Decision2 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (19 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015.
Decision3 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (14 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015.
Decision1 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (16 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016.
Decision2 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (19 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016.
Decision3 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (14 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504.
Gogek Attorney Comments re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Apr. 6, 1960 (3 pages).
Gogek Affidavit Under Rule 132 re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Feb. 26, 1960 (3 pages).
Statement of Revocation Grounds re GB2496951—Claimant Rockwool International (May 21, 2018, 22 pages).
Statement of Revocation Grounds re GB2451719—Claimant Rockwool International (May 18, 2018, 22 pages).
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decisions in Inter Partes Reviews of U.S. Pat. No. D. 631,670 (2 pages)—Jul. 13, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160304703 A1 Oct 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61232255 Aug 2009 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14534806 Nov 2014 US
Child 15188343 US
Parent 13388408 US
Child 14534806 US