This invention relates generally to small, reliable check valves and methods of manufacturing same.
The need for ever-smaller pumping devices, particularly in the medical field, continues to grow. As a result, the need for increasingly small operational pump components, such as check valves, is growing as well, challenging the limits of conventional manufacturing processes. Valves less than 1 or 2 mm in size are difficult to fabricate using conventional molding technology, and while some fabrication of microscale valves using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology is being performed, such techniques can be expensive. Small, commercially available silicone valves produced using conventional techniques tend to be unreliable (exhibiting leakage and large production variations) at the sub-millimeter scale. A clear need exists for a small, reliable and durable valve that is simple to fabricate and suitable for use in microscale pumps having submillimeter component dimensions.
In various embodiments, the present invention provides elastomeric check valve structures that can be manufactured reliably and cost-effectively at small (e.g., submillimeter) scales. A check valve is a one-way valve that allows free flow when a positive differential pressure is applied across the valve (i.e., the pressure at the inlet is greater than the pressure at the outlet), but inhibits (or “checks”) backflow when a negative differential pressure is applied. As described herein, the check valve may be molded from an elastomeric polymer, and may have a configuration similar to a duckbill valve, with an outlet slit that closes in the absence of a positive pressure differential.
In one aspect, the invention is directed to a check valve including an elongated, elastomeric body shaped to fit within a tube and having two axially opposed ends. In various embodiments, a pocket extends into the body from an opening in the first end and has a tapered (and, optionally, rounded) terminus within the body. A slit extends from the second end of the body to the pocket terminus to fluidically couple the second end to the pocket. The slit can be opened only by positive fluid pressure within the pocket. The slit may be sized so as to provide a specified stiction area, and may be tapered from a wide end at the second body end to a narrow end at the pocket terminus.
The valve body may be formed of a material including or consisting essentially of medical-grade silicone, silicone rubber, or a polyurethane-based elastomeric composite, or any material with suitable durometer (e.g., a durometer in the range from about Shore A 5 to about Shore A 100, preferably in the range from about Shore A 20 to about Shore A 40). In some embodiments, the length of the body does not exceed 1 mm and/or the diameter of the body does not exceed 0.5 mm.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a check valve assembly including a valve as described above, a first tube tightly surrounding a portion of the body and extending past the first end from an intermediate point between the first and second ends of the body distal to the pocket terminus, and a second tube tightly surrounding at least a portion of the first tube and extending past the second end of the body. The diameter of the second tube exceeds the diameter of the body so as not to interfere with opening of the slit. In some embodiments, the elastomeric body is made of (or includes) silicone, and the tubes are made of (or include) parylene.
In yet another aspect, the invention pertains to a method of manufacturing a check valve (such as the check valve described above). In various embodiments, the method includes molding an elongated valve body having first and second axially opposed ends and defining therein a pocket extending from an opening in the first end to a tapered terminus within the body. Further, the method involves forming a slit in the body extending from the second end to the pocket terminus to fluidically couple the second end to the pocket portion. The slit is openable only by positive fluid pressure within the pocket portion. The slit may be cut with, for example, a micrometer-scale blade, a silicon blade, a water jet, a laser, a needle, or a fine probe.
In some embodiments, the valve body is molded by filling a glass capillary with an uncured elastomeric polymer in liquid form, introducing an air bubble into the uncured polymer, curing the polymer so as to retain the air pocket following cure, removing the cured polymer from the capillary, and cutting a length of the removed polymer such that the cut length contains a portion of the air pocket that includes the terminus. In alternative embodiments, the molding step involves providing two mold forms, the first form including a cavity that defines an exterior surface of the valve body, and the second form including an extruded structure that defines the pocket and can be inserted into the cavity. Using the two mold forms, the valve body may be molded by filling the space within the cavity surrounding the extrusion with elastomeric polymer in liquid form, curing the polymer, and removing the cured polymer from the mold forms. The mold form may be manufacture using microphotolithography, precision machining, deposition, or a combination of these techniques.
A further aspect relates to a method of manufacturing a check valve assembly. In various embodiments, the method includes the steps of bonding a first tube to a fixture; placing a valve body as described above into the first tube; forming a slit extending from the second end to the pocket terminus to fluidically couple the second end to the pocket portion; bonding a second tube to the first tube; and removing an assembly comprising the valve body, the second tube, and a portion of the first tube from the fixture. The bonding steps may include applying epoxy between respective bonded surfaces. A stainless-steel needle may be used as the fixture; in some embodiments, the needle is crimped at the tip and the first tube bonded to the crimped portion.
These and other advantages and features of the invention will become more apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations. As used herein, the terms “substantially” and “about” generally mean ±10%, and, in some embodiments, ±5%. The term “consists essentially of” means excluding other materials that contribute to function, unless otherwise defined herein. Nonetheless, such other materials may be present, collectively or individually, in trace amounts.
The valve body 202 may be made of an elastomeric polymer (or “elastomer”) of suitable durometer values (e.g., a durometer value in the range from about Shore A 5 to about Shore A 100, in some embodiments in the range from about Shore A 20 to about Shore A 40). The durometer is a standard measure of the hardness of a rubber-like material, and may be determined, for example, by measuring the depth of an indentation created in the material surface by a standard force. The durometer value influences both the elasticity and the surface energy (due to stiction) of the elastomer material. Within typical durometer ranges of rubber materials, a higher-durometer elastomer is usually softer (i.e., has lower elasticity) and “stickier” (i.e., has higher stiction). In valve structures, both higher elasticity and higher stiction tend to result in higher cracking pressures. Suitable elastomers for use in valves described herein include, for example, medical-grade silicone, silicone rubber, and polyurethane, but other natural or synthetic rubbers (like buna (polybutadiene) or viton (fluorinated hydrocarbon)) may also be used
The valve body 202 may be housed within a tube for protection. To minimize the outside diameter of the overall structure, the housing tube preferably has a thin wall. The tube may be made from a material that resists expansion, thereby containing the valve's internal pressure; suitable materials include, e.g., hard plastics (such as, but not limited to, parylene, polystyrene, polyacrylate, or polyetheretherketone), metals, glass, or composite materials. The valve housing desirably conforms tightly to the maximum dimension of the valve body 202 at the inlet 206, but provides a circumferential clearance around the front section of the valve that includes the outlet 212. As illustrated, this may be accomplished with two nested tubes 216, 218. A portion of the valve body 202 that includes the inlet end 206 may be mounted or received within the inner, upstream tube 216, which is itself received within the outer, downstream tube 218 as illustrated. The two tubes 216, 218 may be secured to one another where they overlap with an adhesive such as, e.g., epoxy. In alternative embodiments, the valve body may be placed into a single tube of varying diameter, or it may include a recessed portion at the outlet end and be placed into a single tube of constant diameter.
The pressure exerted on the walls of the valve body closest to the valve outlet 212 creates peeling forces at the slit 210, which may affect valve opening both under forward pressure and under backpressure. By using a valve body 202 whose side walls remain parallel near the outlet 212 (resulting, e.g., in a constant diameter for a circular valve cross section), as shown in
The closure behavior of the valve (as characterized, among other things, by the cracking and closing pressures) generally depends on the elasticity and geometry of the valve body 202 as well as on the surface energy of the slit 210. The surface energy, in turn, is a function of the area of the stiction surface (i.e., the area of the slit) and the coefficient of static friction of the valve body material. Thus, for a given valve material, the cracking pressure of the valve may be set by adjusting the stiction area. The larger the stiction area, the higher the surface energy and, thus, the cracking pressure. As shown in
An exemplary check valve in accordance herewith may include a silicone valve body housed in parylene tubing. Parylene is highly biocompatible and, thus, particularly suited for use in medical implants. To facilitate use of the valve in microscale pumps, the valve body may be fabricated to a diameter of less than 0.5 mm (e.g., 0.25 mm) and a length of less than 1 mm (e.g., 0.5 mm); in some embodiments, even valve dimensions of only tens of micrometers are possible. However, larger valves are also within the scope of the invention.
Elastomeric valve bodies as described herein can be manufactured at low cost using any of various molding techniques. One method, illustrated in
Other suitable molding techniques for the valve body include the use of microphotolithography to fabricate suitable mold forms, followed by soft lithography to mold the valve body. For example, silicon blocks may be etched using photoresist as a mask to create two complementary mold forms as illustrated in
The use of photolithography to pattern the molds 700, 702 generally offers finer control over feature sizes and shapes than standard machining processes. However, in various embodiments, traditional or non-traditional high-precision machining techniques may be used to produce the molds for the valve body. For example, electrical discharge machining (EMD) may be utilized to create highly accurate metal molds for the valve. Yet another way to create the insert mold 702 for the elastomeric check valve body is to use a deposition technique. Examples include, but are not limited to, thick photoresist coating (using, e.g., AZ 4610, AZ 9260, or SU-8 series photoresist), oxide deposition, and metal deposition.
A symmetrically shaped, micrometer-scale blade (e.g., an ophthalmic blade or lance) may be used to cut a slit 911 into the silicone valve body 906 at the outlet end (
In the next step, a downstream parylene tube 912 is slipped over the round portion 910 of the upstream tube 902. Epoxy (or another suitable adhesive) 914 is applied around the interface between the upstream and downstream parylene tubes 902, 912 and allowed to run into the gap between both tubes (
Check valves in accordance with the present invention have commercial applications for a variety of fluidic and pump devices, including, e.g., drug pumps for external use or implantation.
Although the present invention is described above with reference to specific embodiments and details, the invention is not limited to those embodiments and details. Rather, various additions and modifications to what is expressly described herein, which will be readily apparent to one of skill in the art, are also included within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein can exist in various combinations and permutations without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, details of the above description are intended for illustration only, and not to be regarded as limiting the scope of the invention, except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/383,102, filed on Sep. 15, 2010, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
996588 | Kennedy | Jun 1911 | A |
3307819 | Cocito | Mar 1967 | A |
3608676 | Wieck | Sep 1971 | A |
4014048 | Rappleyea | Mar 1977 | A |
4124773 | Elkins | Nov 1978 | A |
4143853 | Abramson | Mar 1979 | A |
4434810 | Atkinson | Mar 1984 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4531543 | Markley | Jul 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4636150 | Falk et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4867200 | Markley | Sep 1989 | A |
4869282 | Sittler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4948092 | Kasper et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5071408 | Ahmed | Dec 1991 | A |
5116457 | Jerman | May 1992 | A |
5171606 | Mayer et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5199685 | Larseneur | Apr 1993 | A |
5222522 | Rontome | Jun 1993 | A |
5261459 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265415 | Cox, Jr. | Nov 1993 | A |
5411473 | Ahmed | May 1995 | A |
5454796 | Krupin | Oct 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5490220 | Loeppert | Feb 1996 | A |
5727594 | Choksi | Mar 1998 | A |
5785674 | Mateen | Jul 1998 | A |
5839467 | Saaski et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6069392 | Tai et al. | May 2000 | A |
6126273 | Van Vooren et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136212 | Mastrangelo et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146543 | Tai et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6202766 | Shepherd | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237619 | Maillefer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240962 | Tai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241904 | Silverbrook | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6334761 | Tai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345502 | Tai et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6470904 | Tai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499297 | Tai et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6536213 | Tai et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554591 | Dai et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6612535 | Tai et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6699394 | Tai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709604 | Tai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712591 | Lee | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7025740 | Ahmed | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7600533 | Tai et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8141573 | Tai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8276616 | Wright et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010014438 | Tai et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019034 | Tai et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020062645 | Tai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030116738 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040033146 | Dai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060247664 | Meng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080035875 | Tai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100025613 | Tai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110127232 | Willows et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120241017 | Lin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140196798 | Tai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9102284 | Oct 1991 | DE |
102008045423 | Mar 2010 | DE |
0903179 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2616727 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2049283 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2006-214837 | Aug 2006 | JP |
4977758 | Jul 2012 | JP |
9531082 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9854497 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2004011143 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2012037348 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2014110507 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014110507 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed Mar. 14, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051759 (4 pages). |
Written Opinion mailed Mar. 14, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051759 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 14, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051759 (11 pages). |
PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/051759, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013, 7 pages. |
PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/011301, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 5, 2015, 17 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for Patent Application No. 07800089.0 mailed Jan. 23, 2013, 6 pages. |
English Translation of Office Action mailed Aug. 2, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-524019, 3 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/075746, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 7, 2009, 33 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/075746, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 12, 2008, 6 pages. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/011301, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed Jun. 2, 2014, 6 pages. |
Berg et al., “Micro Total Analysis Systems: Microfluidic Aspects, Integration Concept and Applications”, Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 194, 1998, pp. 21-49. |
Chen et al., “Floating-Disk Parylene Micro Check Valve”, IEEE 20th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Jan. 21-25, 2007, pp. 453-456. |
Chen et al., “Surface-Micromachined in-Channel Parylene Dual Valves for Unpowered Microflow Regulation”, Tech. Digest, HiltonHead 2006 Workshop, 2006, pp. 205-209. |
Chen et al., “Surface-Micromachined Parylene Dual Valves for On-Chip Unpowered Microflow Regulation”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 16, No. 2, Apr. 2007, pp. 223-231. |
Dabral et al., “Stress in Thermally Annealed Parylene Films”, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 21, No. 10, Oct. 1992, pp. 989-994. |
Euro Standard Press 2000, “Surface Mount Microphone Based on MEMS Technology”, available at <http://www.esp2000.ro/articol.php?id—ar=2222>, No. 3, Nov. 2003. |
Gervais et al., “Flow-Induced Deformation of Shallow Microfluidic Channels”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 6, No. 4, 2006, pp. 500-507. |
Knowles Electronics LLC, “SiSonic”, available online at <http://www.knowlesacoustics.com/html/sil—mic.html#modelchart>. |
Lecompte et al., “Photoresist Characterization and Linearization Procedure for the Gray-Scale Fabrication of Diffractive Optical Elements”, Applied Optics, vol. 40, No. 32, 2001, pp. 5921-5927. |
Loeppert et al., “SiSonicTM—The First Commercialized Mems Microphone”, Proc. HiltonHead 2006 Workshop, Jun. 2006, pp. 27-30. |
Meng et al., “Implantable Parylene MEMS for Glaucoma Therapy”, Microtechnology in Medicine and Biology, 3rd IEEE/EMBS Special Topic Conference, May 12-15, 2005, pp. 116-119. |
Oh et al., “A Review of Microvalves”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 16, No. 5, 2006, pp. R13-R39. |
Oppliger et al., “One-step 3D Shaping Using a Gray-Tone Mask for Optical and Microelectronic Applications”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 23, No. 1-4, Jan. 1994, pp. 449-454. |
Shih et al., “Surface Micromachined and Integrated Capacitive Sensors for Microfluidic Applications”, Transducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, vol. 1, Boston, MA, USA, Jun. 8-12, 2003, pp. 388-391. |
Shoji et al., “Microflow Devices and Systems”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 1994, pp. 157-171. |
Shoji, Shuichi, “Fluids for Sensor Systems”, Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 194, 1998, pp. 163-188. |
Wagner et al., “Microfabrication of Complex Surface Topographies Using Grey-Tone Lithography”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 46, No. 1-3, Jan.-Feb. 1995, pp. 89-94. |
Waits et al., “Investigation of Gray-Scale Technology for Large Area 3D Silicon MEMS Structures”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 13, No. 2, 2003, pp. 170-177. |
Wang et al., “A Normally Closed in-Channel Micro Check Valve”, The Thirteenth Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS 2000, Jan. 23-27, 2000, pp. 68-73. |
Wang et al., “A Parylene Micro Check Valve”, Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS '99, Twelfth IEEE International Conference, Jan. 21-21, 1999, pp. 177-182. |
Xie et al., “Surface Micromachined Leakage Proof Parylene Check Valve”, Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference; Interlaken, Switzerland, Jan. 25-25, 2001, pp. 539-542. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120211095 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61383102 | Sep 2010 | US |