1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to methods and apparatus for monitoring the blood glucose level in biological tissues. It is especially useful for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose in human or animal diabetics. Specifically, it relates to methods and apparatus for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose using optical coherence interferometry with continuous area scanning and simultaneous depth scanning to reduce the effect of speckle (noise).
2. Description of the Related Art
Monitoring of blood glucose (blood sugar) concentration levels has long been critical to the treatment of diabetes in humans. Current blood glucose monitors involve a chemical reaction between blood serum and a test strip, requiring an invasive extraction of blood via a lancet or pinprick. Small handheld monitors have been developed to enable a patient to perform this procedure anywhere, at any time. But the inconvenience of this procedure—specifically the blood extraction and the use and disposition of test strips—has led to a low level of compliance. Such low compliance can lead to serious medical complications. Thus, a non-invasive method for monitoring blood glucose is needed.
Studies have shown that optical methods can detect small changes in biological tissue scattering related to changes in levels of blood sugar. Although highly complex, a first order approximation of monochromatic light scattered by biological tissue can be described by the following simplified equation:
IR=IOexp[−(μa+μs)L]
where IR is the intensity of light reflected from the skin, IO is the intensity of the light illuminating the skin, μa is the absorption coefficient of the skin at the specific wavelength of light, μs is the scatter coefficient of the skin at the specific wavelength of light, and L is the total path traversed by the light. From this relationship it can be seen that the intensity of the light decays exponentially as either the absorption or the scattering of the tissue increases.
It is well established that there is a difference in the index of refraction between blood serum/interstitial fluid (blood/IF) and membranes of cells such as blood cells and skin cells. (See, R. C. Weast, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th ed., (CRC Cleveland, Ohio 1989)). This difference can produce characteristic scattering of transmitted light. Glucose, in its varying forms, is a major constituent of blood/IF. The variation of glucose levels in blood/IF changes its refractive index and thus, the characteristic scattering from blood-perfused tissue. In the near infrared wavelength range (NIR), blood glucose changes the scattering coefficient more than it changes the absorption coefficient. Thus, the optical scattering of the blood/IF and cell mixture varies as the blood glucose level changes. Accordingly, an optical method has potential for non-invasive measurement of blood glucose concentration.
Non-invasive optical techniques being explored for blood glucose application include polarimetry, Raman spectroscopy, near-infrared absorption, scattering spectroscopy, photoacoustics and optoacoustics. Despite significant efforts, these techniques have shortcomings such as low sensitivity, low accuracy (less than current invasive home monitors) and insufficient specificity of glucose concentration measurement within the relevant physiological range (4-30 mM or 72-540 mg/dL). Accordingly, there is a need for an improved method to non-invasively monitor glucose.
Optical coherence tomography, or OCT, is an optical imaging technique using light waves that produces high resolution imagery of biological tissue. OCT creates its images by interferometrically scanning in depth a linear succession of spots, and measuring absorption and/or scattering at different depths in each successive spot. The data is then processed to present an image of the linear cross section. It has been proposed that OCT might be useful in measuring blood glucose.
There are, however, major drawbacks to the use of OCT for glucose monitoring. First, the OCT process requires lengthy scanning to reduce optical noise (“speckle”). Speckle arises from wavefront distortion, when coherent light scatters from tissue. OCT seeks to minimize speckle by averaging it out over many measurements. However this approach in OCT requires a time period impractically long for a home monitor, and even then speckle in OCT remains problematic for achieving a sufficiently accurate measurement of glucose level.
A second drawback of OCT is that it requires complex processing to form an image and even further processing to analyze the image data to determine glucose levels.
A third drawback is that OCT requires expensive, bulky, precision equipment neither suitable for transport or for use outside the laboratory. Accordingly, there is a need for an improved methods and apparatus for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring.
In accordance with the invention, the blood glucose concentration within a biological tissue is monitored by providing light having scattering properties sensitive to the glucose concentration within the tissue and continuously scanning the light over a two dimensional area of the tissue while, at the same time, interferometrically scanning the tissue in depth. The light reflected from the scanned tissue is collected and analyzed to determine the concentration of glucose in the tissue. In an advantageous embodiment light from one or more sources is split into a sample beam and a reference beam. The sample beam is continuously scanned over the surface and the phase of the reference beam is varied and interfered with the reflected light to effect interferometric depth scanning. In a preferred embodiment, the light provided is composed of at least two different wavelengths having measurably different scattering properties for glucose-containing tissue or biological indicators of such tissue.
An apparatus for measuring the blood glucose level in biological tissue comprises one or more light sources to provide light. Optical fiber or lens-directed paths direct the light onto the tissue, an area scanner continuously scans the light over a two-dimensional area of the tissue and an interferometer effectively scans the tissue in depth. The interferometer also collects, analyzes and measures the light reflected within the tissue. A processor responsive to the light measurements then calculates the glucose level of blood-perfused regions of the tissue. Advantageously, the apparatus uses low coherence light sources (light emitting diodes (LEDs) or super luminescent diodes (SLEDs), a low coherence interferometer (LCI), and beam focusing optics. The continuous scanning over a two-dimensional area and the depth scanning reduce noise or speckle and optimize the amount of blood-perfused tissue scanned.
The advantages, nature and various additional features of the invention will appear more fully upon consideration of the illustrative embodiments now to be described in detail in connection with the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
a and 1b illustrate the anatomy of the skin and the resulting OCT signal;
a and 2b graphically represent the data collected from an OCT signal and blood measurements and the correlation between the two;
It is to be understood that the drawings are for the purpose of illustrating the concepts of the invention, and except for the graphs, are not to scale.
a is a schematic cross section of the skin showing the skin surface 1, the epidermis layer 2 and the dermis layer 3. Various additional structures are labeled. Some structures, such as hair and its associated follicles, scatter light in a manner unrelated to glucose concentration. Other regions, such as regions in the dermis near the capillaries are perfused with blood and IF blood-perfused tissues) and light scattered from these regions is highly correlated with glucose concentration.
b graphically illustrates light scattered within the skin as a function of depth. Region 1 of the curve corresponds to light reflected from the skin surface. Region 2 shows light scattered within the epidermis, and Region 3 is light scattered from the dermis. As we will show, slope of the curve at depths where the tissue is perfused with blood (e.g. near the capillaries) is highly correlated with blood glucose levels.
a graphically plots the slope of the optical signal reflected by blood-perfused tissue (the continuous line) and the measured blood glucose concentration (rectangular dots) as a function of time after a human subject ingests a glucose drink. As can be seen, the slope of the reflected signal closely follows the glucose concentration.
b illustrates the best-fit linear relation between the slope of the reflected optical signal in
Applicant has determined that the information contained in scattered optical signals can be used to measure glucose concentration without creating and analyzing images. At a wavelength of around 1.3 μm, the scattering coefficient, μs, is several times larger than the absorption coefficient, μa, and a simple linear fit to the logarithmic data will yield the scattering coefficients within the dermis layer. For blood-perfused regions, this scattering coefficient can be related to glucose concentration changes within the blood.
A non-invasive glucose monitor ideally overcomes three problems. First, the speckle (noise) should be overcome within a reasonable test time. Second, the effect of tissues other than blood-perfused tissues should be minimized, and third, as much blood-perfused tissue as possible should be analyzed. Applicant addresses these problems by continuously scanning a two-dimensional area of the tissue to be monitored (preferably the skin) while at the same time interferometrically scanning to different depths. The area scanning optionally combined with the multiple level depth scanning permits measurement of many different localized areas of blood-perfused tissue, minimizing the effect of speckle. Preferably, the light comprises at least two different wavelengths of light having measurably different absorption and scattering properties for glucose, blood, or other biological indicators of blood-perfused tissues. The two different wavelengths permit identification of which measurements are of blood-perfused tissues.
In some respects, the invention can be thought of as a modification of OCT from an imaging technique to a non-imaging technique. Since no image is formed, the collection optics and data processing are greatly simplified. In addition, the surface scanning is changed from stepwise linear scanning to continuous or near continuous two dimensional area scanning to more rapidly and effectively reduce speckle.
Adapting an OCT system to blood glucose sensing, instead of imaging, provides non-invasive glucose concentration monitoring of a human or animal subject, because the scattered optical signal data can be collected and processed more easily and the resulting data can be correlated linearly to the level of glucose. Additionally, continuous scanning of the incident light beam over a two-dimensional area on the skin surface, instead of the conventional one-dimensional straight line, markedly improves, signal stability while dramatically reducing the noise associated with tissue inhomogeneity. Advantageously an area in the general shape of a circle is scanned.
More specifically, the invention uses interferometry, preferably low coherence interferometry (LCI), to measure the glucose concentration of human or animal blood-perfused tissue. LCI can be effected with convenient low coherence light sources and provides advantageously small volumes of constructive interference (“regions of optical interaction”) that can be used to localize readings to blood-perfused tissue. Beam focusing can be used to further localize the regions of optical interaction. LCI uses a standard interferometer illuminated by low coherence light sources. The interferometer can be any one of the standard forms, e.g. Michaelson, Mach-Zehnder, or the like. The light sources can be LEDs or SLEDs.
The invention is advantageously directed to measure the blood glucose concentration from tissue located in the dermis layer of the skin (3 of
With low coherence sources, the interferogram is generated over a small volume whose position in the depth of the object can be determined via the phase of a reference beam. This, in turn, can be controlled by a phase shifter, such as a movable reference reflector, preferably a mirror. Thus, a high degree of localization of the measured scattering phenomena can be achieved. For example, for a typical light emitting diode (LED) operating at a 1.3 μm wavelength, a depth resolution of 10 μm is easily achieved in biological tissues. Typically in biological tissues, the scatter of the light occurs at the interface between the cell membrane and the fluid that surrounds the cell (i.e. blood or interstitial fluid). Measuring this scatter permits the glucose level to be determined, as by the linear fit shown in
The next step, shown in Block B, is to split the single beam of light into a reference beam and a sample beam. The reference beam travels in an adjustable phase path denoted as the reference beam path (reference arm), and the sample beam travels in a sample beam path (sample arm) where it is directed onto the tissue to be monitored, e.g. the skin of a human diabetic. The light in the reference beam is directed over an adjustable phase path and will subsequently be interfered with sample light reflected from within the tissue.
In the third step, Block C, the sample beam is continuously or near continuously scanned over a two-dimensional area of the tissue while, at the same time, being interferometrically scanned in depth. Block D shows varying the phase (path length) of the reference beam so that light from the reference beam constructively interferes with reflected sample light from successively different depths of tissue. Block E shows the reflected light collected and interfered with the reference beam. As the interferometer sweeps in depth, the surface scan is also sweeping continuously. This “smears” out the scan and reduces the effect of speckle.
The next steps, Blocks F, G, and H are to process the resulting data to calculate glucose concentration. In essence, this is achieved by computing the scattering coefficient of glucose-containing tissue. Block F indicates the scanning data is input into a digital processor. Block G, which is optional, but advantageous, is to identify those scattering measurements that are from blood-perfused tissue (in or near blood vessels). Such identification can be accomplished, for example, by providing light of two different wavelengths, at least one of which scatters from blood-perfused tissues in a characteristic manner. Finally, in Block H, the scattering coefficient of the glucose containing tissue is calculated, and the correlated glucose level in blood is determined.
The tissue volume with which the light interacts (referred to as the interaction volume) is determined by the spot size of the imaging optics (surface area) and the coherence length of the light (depth) The reference beam 404 has a scanning reflector 405 (such as a mirror). The reflector 405 of the interferometer determines the phase shift applied to the reference beam 404 and thus, which reflected light from the reference beam 404 will constructively interfere with the reflected sample beam 403. The differences in phase of the beams determines the depth from which scattered light will be measured. This can permit a fixed depth, adjustable depth, or a scan of multiple depths within the tissue. LCI is thus sensitive to the intensity of the reflected light localized in a small volume of tissue. Determination of the depth and interaction volume permits a more accurate selection of regions of blood-perfused tissue beneath the skin.
A photodetector 407 (such as a photodiode) can be used to measure the interference of the light from both the sample beam 402 and the reference beam 404. One or more photodetectors 407 may be used along with optical filters (not shown) designed for each of the different wavelength light sources 406 used in the measurement.
Preferably, the imaging optics 403 are beam focusing optics to reduce the beam cross section so as to minimize the region of optical interaction with the tissue. The use of these optics will enhance the selectivity of the signal while also reducing the effect of speckle.
Light passing through turbid biological tissue is subject to wavefront distortion that produces coherent noise or “speckle”. The effect of speckle can be reduced by taking multiple scans from different locations on the tissue and then averaging these scans. This solution is impractical for the typical OCT imaging system, because the vast number of scans needed to reduce speckle would take too long and would produce a severe loss in the resolution of the image. However, for the present invention, the collection optics can be simpler. The present non-imaging system presents a practical solution to reducing coherent noise. Not only does the speckle effect significantly decrease, but the non-imaging system can continuously scan a two-dimensional area of tissue instead of being limited to a single scanning line. Area scans reduce speckle due to the diversity of tissue regions encompassed in the scan. They also maximize the coverage of blood-perfused tissue. Thus, coherent noise is also further reduced.
An alternative solution is to use parallel optical processing where multiple spots on the subject tissue are measured together to create “boiling” speckle. Boiling speckle occurs where the sub-spot speckle is changing so quickly that the observed speckle is averaged out by the human eye, or the integration time of the optical receiver. This inventive system may be modified to create boiling speckle by replacing the scanner 408 with either a lenslet array or a diffractive optical element (DOE). If the lenslet or DOE is rapidly translated or rotated about the optical axis at a very high speed, the observed speckle will be averaged out. Additionally, such a system reduces the number of scans required due to the greater variety of speckle detected.
Since glucose is delivered to the interstitial fluid (IF) in skin via blood, determining the scatter coefficient in the dermis layer of the tissue, where blood vessels are plentiful, provides the closest correlation to variations in glucose concentration. Again, an area scan increases the volume of blood-perfused tissue measured.
Area scanning could be achieved by a pair of rotating prisms that continuously move a sample beam spot over a circular area of the tissue surface. Advantageously, the spot would move a minimum of one spot diameter for each depth scan. Thus if the beam spot size is 12 microns and the depth scan is at a rate of 20 Hz, then the spot should advantageously be moved at a minimum rate of 240 microns per second and preferably much faster.
Spot diameters are typically in the range from about 10 microns to 100 microns and preferably 20 microns and higher.
The minimum area of the scan is defined by the number of spot diameters needed to move at the minimum depth scan rate. For the 12 micron spot and 20 Hz depth scan, the minimum area that would need scanning is about 2200 square microns, corresponding to a circular area of about 500 micron diameter. More preferably the system would be designed to cover an area corresponding to a diameter of 500 microns to 10,000 microns.
For speckle reduction using the boiling speckle method of noise reduction, the multiple spots would need to be moved quite rapidly. The spot should move at a minimum of one spot diameter in the integration time of the receiver. For individual spot sizes of about 10 microns and an integration time of about 4 microseconds, the spots would need to move at a minimum of 2.4×105 microns/sec.
The light sources 406 can be light emitting diodes (LED) or super luminescent diodes (SLEDs), both of which are semiconductor based light emitters whose wavelengths can be chosen to give the best contrast between absorption and scatter of blood and other biological constituents, such as water. Typically these wavelengths are in the red/near infrared (RNIR) region of the spectrum, however, longer and shorter wavelengths can be used for enhanced sensitivity. For the glucose measurements, two or more light sources are advantageous and can share the same optical paths through the interferometer.
One of the wavelengths can be chosen to have minimum absorption compared to the scattering coefficient for water and blood constituents. If the other wavelength is chosen to have peak absorption for certain biological constituents, then the difference in light attenuation between the two wavelengths can indicate the position in depth of a relevant structure, such as a blood vessel. Light from the two wavelengths is differently absorbed by the different constituents. This differential absorption differentially reduces the intensity of the scattered (reflected) light. Light reflected off the cellular membrane is partially absorbed by the respective constituent for that wavelength. Where the term “light is reflected from the blood” is used, it is understood to refer to light reflected from the cells in and around the blood vessels, and the constituent in the blood absorbs some of the light according to the specific wavelength and glucose level of the blood. These differences in the scattering and absorption properties provide for an optimal correlation between the scattered signal and blood glucose data.
One exemplary application is a first wavelength of about 1310 nm and a second wavelength of about 820-960 nm. A first wavelength of 1310 nm is chosen because the scattering properties of water and blood and blood constituents is at a maximum compared to the absorption properties of these fluids. The second wavelength, 820-960 nm, is chosen because the absorption of light is very high in the presence of hemoglobin, a blood constituent, (compared to the first wavelength). If the signal of the second wavelength were to experience a rapid decrease at a particular depth in the interaction volume, this rapid decrease would indicate the presence of hemoglobin, and hence, the location of blood-perfused tissue. It would thus indicate an optimal slope region for the scattering data of the first wavelength to be related to the glucose concentration.
A second example would be a first wavelength of about 1310 nm and a second wavelength of about 1450 nm. At this second wavelength, the scattering coefficients for blood and water are similar to those of the first wavelength. However, the absorption coefficient for water at this second wavelength is exponentially larger than that of the first wavelength. Thus, a differential measurement between these two wavelengths indicates changes in the hydration level of the tissue. Such changes can then be used to indicate an optimal slope region for measuring blood glucose. However, the use of these two specific wavelengths provides an additional benefit of sensor calibration. As the hydration level in the dermis layer varies, the scattering coefficient of the first wavelength may drift, even though the glucose concentration remains static. Thus, by measuring the skin hydration using the second wavelength, this drift can be compensated for and the OCT sensor can maintain calibration.
An exemplary analysis of the data to determine glucose level essentially involves the following steps:
This, or comparable algorithms can be readily implemented in digital processors by those skilled in the art to provide a rapid, non-invasive readout of glucose level.
It is understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the many possible specific embodiments, which can represent applications of the invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/832,721, filed Aug. 2, 2007, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Monitoring Blood Constituent Levels in Biological Tissue,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/916,236, filed on Aug. 11, 2004, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Monitoring Glucose Levels in a Biological Tissue,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,254,429, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3826905 | Valkama et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3958560 | March | May 1976 | A |
4014321 | March | Mar 1977 | A |
4476875 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4590948 | Nilsson | May 1986 | A |
4606351 | Lubbers | Aug 1986 | A |
4655225 | Dahne et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4704029 | Van Heuvelen | Nov 1987 | A |
4731363 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743604 | Alig et al. | May 1988 | A |
4750830 | Lee | Jun 1988 | A |
4834111 | Khanna et al. | May 1989 | A |
4871755 | Alig et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4873989 | Einzig | Oct 1989 | A |
4882492 | Schlager | Nov 1989 | A |
4883953 | Koashi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4890621 | Hakky et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4901728 | Hutchison | Feb 1990 | A |
4948248 | Lehman | Aug 1990 | A |
4960128 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964408 | Hink et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4979509 | Hakky | Dec 1990 | A |
4989978 | Groner | Feb 1991 | A |
5025785 | Weiss | Jun 1991 | A |
5028787 | Rosenthal et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041187 | Hink et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5054487 | Clarke | Oct 1991 | A |
5069213 | Polczynski | Dec 1991 | A |
5070874 | Barnes et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101814 | Palti | Apr 1992 | A |
5112124 | Harjunmaa et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115133 | Knudson | May 1992 | A |
5163438 | Gordon et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168325 | Yoder-Short | Dec 1992 | A |
5178153 | Einzig | Jan 1993 | A |
5209231 | Cote et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222495 | Clarke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222496 | Clarke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5243983 | Tarr et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5267152 | Yang et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277181 | Mendelson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5278627 | Aoyagi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5313941 | Braig et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319355 | Russek | Jun 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5337744 | Branigan | Aug 1994 | A |
5341805 | Stavridi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348003 | Caro | Sep 1994 | A |
5349953 | McCarthy et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5361758 | Hall et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
D353195 | Savage et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
D353196 | Savage et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
5370114 | Wong et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372136 | Steuer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376336 | Lubbers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377676 | Vari et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5379238 | Stark | Jan 1995 | A |
5383452 | Buchert | Jan 1995 | A |
5398681 | Kupershmidt | Mar 1995 | A |
D359546 | Savage et al. | Jun 1995 | S |
5431170 | Mathews | Jul 1995 | A |
5433197 | Stark | Jul 1995 | A |
5435309 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
D361840 | Savage et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
D362063 | Savage et al. | Sep 1995 | S |
5448992 | Kupershmidt | Sep 1995 | A |
5452716 | Clift | Sep 1995 | A |
5452717 | Branigan et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
D363120 | Savage et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
5456252 | Vari et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457535 | Schmidtke et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479934 | Imran | Jan 1996 | A |
5482036 | Diab et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490505 | Diab et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492118 | Gratton et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494043 | O'Sullivan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501226 | Petersen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5533511 | Kaspari et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534851 | Russek | Jul 1996 | A |
5535743 | Backhaus et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549114 | Petersen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551422 | Simonsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553616 | Ham et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561275 | Savage et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562002 | Lalin | Oct 1996 | A |
5582168 | Samuels et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582171 | Chornenky et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590649 | Caro et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602924 | Durand et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5632272 | Diab et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638816 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638818 | Diab et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645440 | Tobler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5685299 | Diab et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710630 | Essenpreis et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
D393830 | Tobler et al. | Apr 1998 | S |
5743262 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758644 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5760910 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769785 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782757 | Diab et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785659 | Caro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791347 | Flaherty et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795295 | Hellmuth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810734 | Caro et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823950 | Diab et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830131 | Caro et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833618 | Caro et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860919 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890929 | Mills et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904654 | Wohltmann et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919134 | Diab | Jul 1999 | A |
5934925 | Tobler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940182 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995855 | Kiani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997343 | Mills et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002952 | Diab et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011986 | Diab et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027452 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036642 | Diab et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036919 | Thym et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045509 | Caro et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067462 | Diab et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081735 | Diab et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088607 | Diab et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110522 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124597 | Shehada | Sep 2000 | A |
6128521 | Marro et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129675 | Jay | Oct 2000 | A |
6144868 | Parker | Nov 2000 | A |
6147108 | Hauptman | Nov 2000 | A |
6151516 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152754 | Gerhardt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157850 | Diab et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165005 | Mills et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184521 | Coffin, IV et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206830 | Diab et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229856 | Diab et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232609 | Snyder et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236872 | Diab et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241683 | Macklem et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253097 | Aronow et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256523 | Diab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263222 | Diab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278522 | Lepper, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280213 | Tobler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285896 | Tobler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294062 | Buck, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301493 | Marro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317627 | Ennen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321100 | Parker | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325761 | Jay | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334065 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343224 | Parker | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349228 | Kiani et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360114 | Diab et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368283 | Xu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371921 | Caro et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377829 | Al-Ali | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388240 | Schulz et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397091 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6425863 | Werner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430437 | Marro | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430525 | Weber et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443881 | Finger | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463311 | Diab | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470199 | Kopotic et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501975 | Diab et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505059 | Kollias et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515273 | Al-Ali | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519487 | Parker | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525386 | Mills et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526300 | Kiani et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541216 | Wilsey et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6541756 | Schulz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542764 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544212 | Galley et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556853 | Cabib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572566 | Effenhauser | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580086 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584336 | Ali et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595316 | Cybulski et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597932 | Tian et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597933 | Kiani et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606511 | Ali et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6632181 | Flaherty et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639668 | Trepagnier | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640116 | Diab | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643530 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650917 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654624 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658276 | Kianl et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661161 | Lanzo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671531 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678543 | Diab et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684090 | Ali et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684091 | Parker | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697656 | Al-Ali | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697657 | Shehada et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697658 | Al-Ali | Feb 2004 | B2 |
RE38476 | Diab et al. | Mar 2004 | E |
6699194 | Diab et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707554 | Miltner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714804 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
RE38492 | Diab et al. | Apr 2004 | E |
6721582 | Trepagnier et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721585 | Parker | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725073 | Motamedi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725075 | Al-Ali | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728560 | Kollias et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735459 | Parker | May 2004 | B2 |
6745060 | Diab et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760607 | Al-Ali | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770028 | Ali et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771994 | Kiani et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780651 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792300 | Diab et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813511 | Diab et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816741 | Diab | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822564 | Al-Ali | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826419 | Diab et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830711 | Mills et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836337 | Cornsweet | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837337 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847449 | Bashkansky et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850787 | Weber et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850788 | Al-Ali | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852083 | Caro et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861639 | Al-Ali | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6898452 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920345 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931268 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934570 | Kiani et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939305 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943348 | Coffin, IV | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950687 | Al-Ali | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961598 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970792 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6979812 | Al-Ali | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985764 | Mason et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990364 | Ruchti et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993371 | Kiani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996427 | Ali et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999904 | Weber et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003338 | Weber et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003339 | Diab et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015451 | Dalke et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024233 | Ali et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027849 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030749 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039449 | Al-Ali | May 2006 | B2 |
7041060 | Flaherty et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7044918 | Diab | May 2006 | B2 |
7067893 | Mills et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096052 | Mason et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096054 | Abdul-Hafiz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7132641 | Schulz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142901 | Kiani et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149561 | Diab | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7186966 | Al-Ali | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190261 | Al-Ali | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215984 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7215986 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7221971 | Diab | May 2007 | B2 |
7225006 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225007 | Al-Ali | May 2007 | B2 |
RE39672 | Shehada et al. | Jun 2007 | E |
7239905 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245953 | Parker | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254429 | Schurman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254431 | Al-Ali | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254433 | Diab et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254434 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272425 | Al-Ali | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274955 | Kiani et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
D554263 | Al-Ali | Oct 2007 | S |
7280858 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280860 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289835 | Mansfield et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292883 | De Felice et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295866 | Al-Ali | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7307734 | Dogariu | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328053 | Diab et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7332784 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340287 | Mason et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341559 | Schulz et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343186 | Lamego et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566282 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
7353055 | Hogan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355512 | Al-Ali | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356365 | Schurman | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371981 | Abdul-Hafiz | May 2008 | B2 |
7373193 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373194 | Weber et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376453 | Diab et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7377794 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377899 | Weber et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383070 | Diab et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415297 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428432 | Ali et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7438683 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440787 | Diab | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454240 | Diab et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467002 | Weber et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469157 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471969 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471971 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7483729 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483730 | Diab et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489958 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496391 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496393 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D587657 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
7499741 | Diab et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499835 | Weber et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500950 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509154 | Diab et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509494 | Al-Ali | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510849 | Schurman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526328 | Diab et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530942 | Diab | May 2009 | B1 |
7530949 | Al Ali et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530955 | Diab et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7563110 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596398 | Al-Ali et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618375 | Flaherty | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D606659 | Kiani et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7647083 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
D609193 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D614305 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
RE41317 | Parker | May 2010 | E |
7729733 | Al-Ali et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734320 | Al-Ali | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761127 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761128 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764982 | Dalke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D621516 | Kiani et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7791155 | Diab | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801581 | Diab | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7822452 | Schurman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
RE41912 | Parker | Nov 2010 | E |
7844313 | Kiani et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844314 | Al-Ali | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844315 | Al-Ali | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865222 | Weber et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873497 | Weber et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880606 | Al-Ali | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7880626 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7884945 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891355 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894868 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899507 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7899518 | Trepagnier et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904132 | Weber et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909772 | Popov et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910875 | Al-Ali | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919713 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937128 | Al-Ali | May 2011 | B2 |
7937129 | Mason et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7937130 | Diab et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7941199 | Kiani | May 2011 | B2 |
7951086 | Flaherty et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957780 | Lamego et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962188 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962190 | Diab et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7976472 | Kiani | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988637 | Diab | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7990382 | Kiani | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7991446 | Ali et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000761 | Al-Ali | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008088 | Bellott et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
RE42753 | Kiani-Azarbayjany et al. | Sep 2011 | E |
8019400 | Diab et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028701 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8029765 | Bellott et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036727 | Schurman et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036728 | Diab et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046040 | Ali et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046041 | Diab et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046042 | Diab et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048040 | Kiani | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8050728 | Al-Ali et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
RE43169 | Parker | Feb 2012 | E |
8118620 | Al-Ali et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126528 | Diab et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128572 | Diab et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8130105 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145287 | Diab et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150487 | Diab et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175672 | Parker | May 2012 | B2 |
8180420 | Diab et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8182443 | Kiani | May 2012 | B1 |
8185180 | Diab et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190223 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190227 | Diab et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8203438 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203704 | Merritt et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224411 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228181 | Al-Ali | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229533 | Diab et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233955 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244325 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255026 | Al-Ali | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255027 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255028 | Al-Ali et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260577 | Weber et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265723 | McHale et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8274360 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8301217 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310336 | Muhsin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315683 | Al-Ali et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
RE43860 | Parker | Dec 2012 | E |
8337403 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346330 | Lamego | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353842 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355766 | MacNeish, III et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359080 | Diab et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364223 | Al-Ali et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364226 | Diab et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374665 | Lamego | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385995 | Al-ali et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385996 | Smith et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388353 | Kiani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8399822 | Al-Ali | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401602 | Kiani | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8405608 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414499 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8418524 | Al-Ali | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423106 | Lamego et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428967 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430817 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8437825 | Dalvi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8455290 | Siskavich | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457703 | Al-Ali | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457707 | Kiani | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463349 | Diab et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466286 | Bellott et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8471713 | Poeze et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473020 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483787 | Al-Ali et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489364 | Weber et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8498684 | Weber et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8509867 | Workman et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8515509 | Bruinsma et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523781 | Al-Ali | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529301 | Al-Ali et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8532727 | Ali et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8532728 | Diab et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547209 | Kiani et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548548 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548550 | Al-Ali | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020016533 | Marchitto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040260158 | Hogan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043597 | Xie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070771 | Rule et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101846 | Fine et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105097 | Fang-Yen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050226912 | Lowery | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254061 | Alphonse | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080021293 | Schurman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110015505 | Schurman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110319731 | Schurman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0282234 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0160768 | May 1989 | EP |
0127947 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0280986 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0317121 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0536187 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0589191 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0603658 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0631137 | Mar 2002 | EP |
0670143 | May 2003 | EP |
WO 8806726 | Sep 1988 | WO |
WO 8910087 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9118548 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9210131 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9217765 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9300855 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9307801 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9309421 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9316629 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9404070 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9413193 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9532416 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 02065090 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arnold. M.A. et al., “Determination of Physiological Levels of Glucose in an Aqueous Matrix with Digitally Filtered Fourier Transform Near-Infrared Spectra,” Anal. Chem. 64(14):1457-64 (1990). |
Arnold, V.W. et al., “Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectrometry—A New (Old) Method of Detection in Forensic Chemistry and Criminal Investigation,” Beitr Gerichtl Med. 47:123-47 (1989). |
Bruulsema, J.T. et al., “Correlation Between Blood Glucose Concentration in Diabetics and Noninvasively Measured Tissue Optical Scattering Coefficient,” Opt. Lett. 22(3):190-93 (1997). |
Burritt, M.F., “Current Analytical Approaches to Measuring Blood Analytes,” Clin. Chem. 36(8 pt.2):1562-66 (1990). |
Chira, I.S. et al., “Light Scattering by Blood Components After Supplying Glucose,” Biomed. Tech. 35(5): 102-06 (1990). |
Christison, G.B. et al., “Laser Photoacoustic Determination of Physiological Glucose Concentrations in Human Whole Blood,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 31(3):284-90 (1993). |
Cote, G.L. et al., “Noninvasive Optical Polarimetric Glucose Sensing Using a True Phase Measurement Technique,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Enq, 39(7):752-56 (1992). |
CRC Press, “Handbook of Chemistry and Physics” 64th ed. pp. D-223, D-224, and D. 235. |
Drezek, R. et al., “Light Scattering From Cell: Finite Difference Time-Domain Simulations and Goniometric Measurements,” Appl. Opt. 38(16):3651-61 (1999). |
Duck, F. A., Physical Properties of Tissue, (Academic London 1990). |
Dyer, D.G. et al., “Accumulation of Maillard Reaction Products in Skin Collagen in Diabetes and Aging,” J. Clin. Invest. 91:2463-69 (1993). |
Esenaliev, R.O, et al., “Noninvasive Monitoring of Glucose Concentration with Optical Coherence Tomography,” Optics Lett. 26(13):992-94 (2001). |
Faber, D.J. et al., “Light Absorption of (oxy-)Hemoglobin Assessed by Spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography,” Optics Lett. 28(16):1436-38 (2003). |
Fercher, A. et al., “In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography,” Amer, J. Opthalmol, 116(1):113-14 (1993). |
Flock, S.T. et al., “Total Attentuation Coefficients and Scattering Phase Functions of Tissues and Phantom Materials at 633 nm,” Med. Phvs. 14(5):835-41 (1987). |
Fogt, E.J., “Continuous Ex Vivo and In Vivo Monitoring with Chemical Sensors,” Clin. Chem. 36(8 pt.2):1573-80 (1990). |
Frank, K.H. et al., “Measurements of Angular Distributions of Rayleigh and Mie Scattering Events in Biological Models,” Phvs. Med. Biol. 34(8):1901-16 (1989). |
Gabriel Y.I. et al., “Transcutaneous Glucose Measurement Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy During Hypoglycemia,” Diabetes Care 22(12):2026-32 (1999). |
Galanzha, E.I. et al., “Skin Backreflectance and Microvascular System Functioning at the Action of Osmotic Agents,” J, Phvs. D. Appl. Phvs. 36:1739-46 (2003). |
Gilbert, J.W. et al., “A Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose Biosensor for Diabetes Mellitus,” ASAIO J. 38(2):82-87 (1992). |
Goetz, M.J. et al., “Application of a Multivariate Technique to Raman Spectra for Quantification of Body Chemicals,” IEEE Trans, Biomed. Eng, 42:728-31 (1995). |
Goodman, J.W., Some Fundamental Properties of Speckle, J. Optical Soc. of America 66(11):1145-50 (1976). |
Gough, D.A., “The Composition and Optical Rotary Dispersion of Bovine Aqueous Humor,” Diabetes Care 5(3):266-70 (1982). |
Gunby, P., “Laser-Implant Contact Lens Could be Glucose Monitor,” JAMA 243(4):317 (1980). |
Guyton, A.C., Textbook of medical physiology, (W.B. Saunders Company 1992). |
Huang, D, et al., “Optical Coherence Tomograph,” Science 254:1178-81 (1991). |
Huang, Y.L. et al., “On-Line Determination of Glucose Concentration Throughout Animal Cell Cultures Based on Chemiluminescent Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide Coupled with Flow-Injection Analysis,” J. Biotechnol. 18(1-2):161-72 (1991). |
International Search Report from PCT/US05/26744, mailed Oct. 25, 2006. |
International Search Report, from corresponding PCT/US06/13775, mailed Sep. 13, 2006. |
International Search Report, from corresponding PCT/US06/21535, mailed Feb. 21, 2008. |
Kaiser, N., “Laser Absorption Spectroscopy with an ATR Prism—Noninvasive in Vivo Determination of Glucose,” Horm. Metab. Res. Suppl. 8:30-33 (1979). |
Kajiwara, K. et al., “Spectroscopic Quantitative Analysis of Blood Glucose by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with an Attenuated Total Reflection Prism,” Med, Prog. Technol. 18(3):181-89 (1992). |
Khalil, O.S. “Spectroscopic and Clinical Aspects of Noninvasive Glucose Measurements,” Clin. Chern. 45(2):165-77 (1999). |
Kholodnykh, A.I. et al., “Precision of Measurement of Tissue Optical Properties with Optical Coherence Tomography,” Appl. Optics 42(16):3027-37 (2003). |
King, T.W. et al., “Multispectral Polarimetric Glucose Detection Using a Single Pockels Cell,” Optical Engineering 33(8):2746-53 (1994). |
Kohl, M. et al., “The Influence of Glucose Concentration Upon the Transport of Light in Tissue-Simulating Phantoms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40:1267-87(1995). |
Kohl, M. et al., “Influence of Glucose Concentration on Light Scattering in Tissue-Simulating Phantoms,” Optics Letters 19(24):2170-72 (1994). |
Kruse-Jarres, J.D., “Physicochemical Determinations of Glucose in Vivo,” J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 26(4):201-08 (1988). |
Larin, K.V. et al., “Optoacoustic Signal Profiles for Monitoring Glucose Concentration in Turbid Media,” SPIE Proc. 3726:576-83 (1988). |
Larin, K.V. et al., “Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring With Optical CoherenceTomography,” Diabetes Care 25(12):2263-67 (2002). |
Larin, K.V. et al., “Specificity of Noninvasive Blood Glucose Sensing Using Optical Coherence Tomography Technique: A Pilot Study,” Physics in Med. & Biol. 48:1371-90 (2003). |
Larin, K.V. et al., “Phase-Sensitive Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry for the Detection of Analyte Concentrations,” Appl. Optics 43(17):3408-14 (2004). |
Lide, D.R., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 79th ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1998). |
MacKenzie, H.A. et al., “Advances in Photoacoustic Noninvasive Glucose Testing,” Clin. Chem. 45(9):1587-95 (1999). |
Maier, J.S. et al., “Possible Correlation Between Blood Glucose Concentration and the Reduced Scattering Coefficient of Tissues in the Near Infrared,” Optics Lett. 19(24):2062-64 (1994). |
March, W. et al., “Optical Monitor of Glucose,” Trans. Am. Soc. Artlf. Intern. Organs 25:28-31 (1979). |
March, W.F. et al., “Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring of the Aqueous Humor of the Eye: Part II. Animal Studies and the Scleral Lens,” Diabetes Care 5(3):259-65 (1982). |
Mendelson, Y. et al., “Blood Glucose Measurement by Multiple Attenuated Total Reflection and Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37(5):458-65 (1990). |
Moreno-Bondi, M,C. et al., “Oxygen Optrode for Use in a Fiber-Optic Glucose Biosensor,” Anal. Chem. 62(21):2377-80 (1990). |
Muller, A., “In Vivo Measurement of Glucose Concentration with Lasers,” Harm. Metab. Res. Suppl. 8:33-35 (1979). |
Narayanaswamy, R., “Current Developments in Optical Biochemical Sensors,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 6(6):467-75 (1991). |
Pan, S. et al., “Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Measurement of Physiological Glucose Levels in Variable Matrices of Protein and Triglycerides,” Anal, Chem. 68:1124-35 (1996). |
Peterson, J.I. et al., “A Miniature Fiberoptic pH Sensor Potentially Suitable for Glucose Measurements,” Diabetes Care 5(3):272-74 (1982). |
Quan, K.M. et al., “Glucose Determination by a Pulsed Photoacoustic Technique—An Experimental Study Using a Gelatin-Based Tissue Phantom,” Phys. Med. Biol. 38(12): 1911-22 (1993). |
Rabinovitch, B. et al., “Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring of the Aqueous Humor of the Eye: Part I. Measurement of Very Small Optical Rotations,” Diabetes Care 5(3):254-58 (1982). |
Robinson, M.R. et al., “Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring in Diabetic Patients: A Preliminary Evaluation,” Clin. Chem. 38(9):1618-22 (1992). |
Robinson, R.J, et al., “Glucose-Sensitive Membrane and Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy for Potential Use as an Implantable Glucose Sensor,” ASAIO J. 38(3):M458-62 (1992). |
Rusch, T.L. et al., “Signal Processing Methods for Pulse Oximetry,” Comput. Biol. Med. 26(2):143-59 (1996). |
Schmitt, J.M. et al., “Measurement of Optical Properties of Biological Tissues by Low-Coherence Reflectrometrv,” Appl. Optics 32(30):6032-42 (1993). |
Schmitt, J.M. et al., “Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): A Review,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 5(4):1205-15 (1999). |
Schmitt, J.M. et al., “Speckle in Optical Coherence Tomography,” J. Biomed. Optics 4(1):95-105 (1999). |
Sevick, E.M. et al., “Near-Infrared Optical Imaging of Tissue Phantoms with Measurement in the Change of Optical Path Lengths,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 345:815-23 (1994). |
Sodickson, L.A. et al., “Kromoscopic Analysis: A Possible Alternative to Spectroscopic Analysis for Noninvasive Measurement of Analytes in Vivo,” Clin. Chern. 40(9):1838-44 (1994). |
Star, W.M. et al., “Light Dosimetry: Status and Prospects,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1(2):149-67 (1987). |
Stoddart, S. et al., “Pulse Oximetry: What it is and How to Use it,” J. Neonatal Nursing 10:12-14 (1997). |
Takai, N. et al., “Studies of the Development of Optical Fiber Sensors for Biochemical Analysis,” Artif. Organs 15{2):86-89 (1991). |
Tunchin, V.V. et al., “Light Propagation in Tissues with Controlled Optical Properties,” J. Biomed. Opt. 2(4):401-17 (1997). |
Wang, L. et al., “Speckle Reduction in Laser Projection Systems by Diffractive Optical Elements,” Appl. Optics 37(10):1770-75 (1998). |
Weast, R.C., et al, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th ed., (CRC Cleveland, Ohio, 1989). |
Welch, A.J. et al., Practical Models for Light Distribution in Laser-Irradiated Tissue,' Lasers Surq. Med. 6(6):488-93 (1987). |
Wicksted, J.P. et al., “Monitoring of Aqueous Humor Metabolites Using Raman Spectroscopy,” SPIE Proc. 2135:264-74 (1994). |
Zeller, H. et al., Blood Glucose Measurement by Infrared Spectroscopy,—J. Artif. Organs 12(2):129-35 (1989). |
Zhao, Yonghua, et al. “Doppler standard deviation imaging for clinical monitoring of in vitro human skin blood flow.” Optics Letters. Sep. 15, 2000. vol. 25, No. 18 pp. 1358-1360. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120209094 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11832721 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13456137 | US | |
Parent | 10916236 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11832721 | US |