Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10284884
  • Patent Number
    10,284,884
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 27, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 7, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A real-time content identification and tracking system enabling monitoring of television programming consumption specific to an individual television or other viewing device. Metrics collected may include data regarding viewing of specific broadcast media, commercial messages, interactive on-screen information or other programming, as well as locally cached, time-shifted programming. Information about media consumption by such specific television sets or other viewing means may be returned to a commercial client of the system through a trusted third-party intermediary service and, in certain embodiments, encoded tokens may be used to manage the display of certain events as well as to enable robust auditing of each involved party's contractual performance.
Description
BACKGROUND

The traditional television (TV) viewing experience and the process of accessing video media over the Internet have been converging for some time and are now becoming co-dependent. As a business model, both of these forms of media delivery have experimented over the years with monthly subscription fees and pay-per-view revenue models, but the advertising-supported model remains the dominant economic engine for both.


Financial support from advertisers is usually based on the number of viewers exposed to the advertisement with the advertiser being charged a fee for every thousand “impressions” or times that the advertisement is viewed; usually called “cost per thousand” or “CPM”. Generally speaking, higher CPM rates are charged for advertising that can provide additional details about those individual impressions, such as the time of day it was viewed or the market area where the viewing occurred. Associating the impressions with demographic information regarding those seeing the advertisement is even more valuable, particularly when that demographic is one that advertisers believe to offer better prospects for positive actions regarding the product or service being promoted.


For content accessed by personal computers or any other type of Internet-connected device, a viewer's Internet browsing activities may be readily detected and captured via various techniques. The most common technique is the use of a “cookie”, also known as an HTTP cookie, web cookie, or browser cookie. This is a small data file sent from the website being browsed to the user's browser. The browser then sends the cookie back to the server every time the website is re-loaded so that the server can be made aware of the user's previous activity on that server. This approach enables “shopping carts” to retain earlier, uncompleted purchases, and to pre-authenticate users so that they do not need to re-enter certain identification.


Cookies may also be used to build a history of previous browsing. Such information is beneficially used to enable the presentation of commercial offers that are more likely to be of interest to the user than arbitrary placements. For example, a user in Philadelphia who browses a search engine, such as Google, to look for say, “Hotels in Seattle,” would find that many websites browsed later would be displaying ads for Seattle travel, tours, entertainment, local attractions, and other custom-served offers. This is a result of certain data about the search activity being stored locally on the user's computer in the form of a data cookie.


Another common technique leverages the fact that most commercial web pages are not wholly self-contained. For a variety of technical and commercial reasons, many elements seen on the displayed web page are instead assembled “on the fly” by using content downloaded from many different servers, often geographically dispersed. Hence the screen location where a certain picture, animation or advertisement would be displayed is often actually blank when initially downloaded, but contains program instructions, most commonly in the HTML, or JavaScript languages, that makes a request or “call” to the server where the needed content resides.


These requests typically include the IP address of the requesting computer, the time the content was requested, the type of web browser that made the request, the nature of the display it has to appear on, and other specifics. In addition to acting on the request and serving the requested content, the server can store all of this information and associate it with a unique tracking token, sometimes in the form of a browser cookie, attached to the content request.


Even where the web page does not need additional content to complete the user's viewing experience, this same technique can be used to gain insight into the actions and habits of the person browsing the site, which can then be used to personalize the types of advertising served to the user. This can be accomplished by programming web pages to request a graphic element from a particular server using an invisible (non-displaying) graphic file known as a “tracking pixel.” These are (usually) tiny image files (GIFs, JPEGs, PNGs, etc.) whose Internet address is put into web pages and other HTML documents. When the particular page containing such a tracking pixel is loaded, the web browser then sends a request, typically via the Internet, to a server at the address of the embedded web graphic. The addressed server sends the requested graphic file (e.g., a tracking pixel) and logs the event of the request for the specific graphic. These tracking pixel files are sometimes known by other names such as web bugs, transparent pixels, tracking bugs, pixel tags, web beacons or clear gifs. Regardless of what these token images are called, their function is largely the same.


In many commercial applications, an advertiser or its agency or other third-party service might decide to track impressions (as discussed above, an impression constitutes one person viewing one message) with a tracking pixel. Each time the advertisement is displayed, code in the displaying web page addresses some server, locally or across the Internet, containing the tracking pixel. The server answering the request then records information that can include the user's IP Address, Hostname, Device type, Screen Size, Operating System, Web browser, and the Date that the image was viewed.


In traditional TV viewing, commercial ratings data is typically collected and analyzed in an offline fashion by media research companies such as the Nielsen Company, using specialized equipment sometimes called a “Home Unit” that the research company has arranged to get connected to TV sets in a limited number of selected households. These devices record when the TV was tuned to a particular channel, however, there is currently an unmet need for reliable techniques to measure whether a specific video segment, (either broadcast content or advertisement) was actually watched by the viewer. Meanwhile, there is still no truly reliable process for confirming if and when broadcast content that has been recorded and stored on a DVR or the like is viewed at some later time.


Further, with existing monitoring services, such as Nielsen, there is a material delay between the time a program is broadcast and the availability of reliable, broadly-sampled information about what programming was watched in which markets and by what demographics is made available to either the content providers or advertisers. It is also a matter of significant controversy how valid the projections to the whole U.S. could be when they have been extrapolated from such a small sample of potential viewers (estimated to be approximately one out of every ten thousand households).


Consequently, the ability to accurately determine in near real-time exactly what TV program or advertisement each and every TV viewer in the U.S. is watching at any moment has long been an unmet market need. One reason this has been such a challenge is because it would require being able to identify not just what channel has been tuned to, but specifically what content is being watched, since the media actually being consumed by the viewer can include not just the scheduled programming but also regionally or locally-inserted advertisements, content that has been time-shifted, or other entertainment products.


Some attempts have been made to use audio matching technology to map what is being heard on the home TV set to a database of “audio fingerprints.” This is a process that purports to match the fingerprints to certain specific content. The speed and reliability of such technology that has been made commercially available to date has been found to have limitations. Video matching of screen images to known content is computationally more challenging than using audio but theoretically more accurate and useful. Matching the video segment being viewed to a database of samples (including those extracted only seconds previously from a live TV event) has offered a substantial technical challenge but has been effectively employed and is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 8,595,781, among others.


SUMMARY

The subject matter disclosed in detail below is directed to a real-time content identification and tracking system enabling monitoring of television programming consumption specific to an individual television or other viewing device. Metrics collected may include data regarding viewing of specific broadcast media, commercial messages, interactive on-screen information or other programming, as well as locally cached, time-shifted programming. Information about media consumption by such specific television sets or other viewing means may be returned to a commercial client of the system through a trusted third-party intermediary service and, in certain embodiments, encoded tokens may be used to manage the display of certain events as well as to enable robust auditing of each involved party's contractual performance.


More specifically, the systems and methods disclosed herein enable the identification of a video segment being watched or the identification of an interactive message being displayed on a video screen of any connected TV viewing device, such as a smart TV, a TV with a cable set-top box, or a TV with an Internet-based set-top box. Furthermore, this video segment identification system accurately identifies the segments whether broadcast, previously recorded, or a commercial message, while incorporating that ability into an integrated system enabling the provision of a number of new products and services to commercial clients in many ways similar to the usage tracking functionality provided by so-called cookies and tracking pixels for media consumption over the Internet. Various embodiments of systems and methods are described in detail below from the perspective of commercial practicality.


The ability to monitor the viewing of events on Internet-connected televisions at a multiplicity of locations can be used in conjunction with the display of contextually targeted content. The contextually targeted content is usually embedded within a contextually targeted display application module (hereinafter “contextually targeted display application”). One or more contextually targeted display applications are then sent ahead of time from the central server means to (and loaded in) each participating TV system prior to the display of a video segment of interest associated with those application modules. Sometimes when a contextually targeted display application is executed, the contextually targeted display application calls out to other servers across the Internet to get additional (or current) information to update, or add to, the content already embedded within the application module. All content of a contextually targeted display application, whether sent in advance or retrieved on execution, appears within the framework of a contextually targeted display application window which pops up on the TV screen for the user to view and sometimes interact with. It should be appreciated, however, that sometimes the contextually targeted display application's role is not to display anything but rather to simply call an embedded URL address (or send an embedded encoded token) to trigger an auditing means to register (i.e., log) a viewing event.


One aspect of the subject matter disclosed in detail below is a method, performed by a computer system, for automatically logging a viewing event on a screen of a television system, comprising the following operations: (a) storing a respective reference data set for each of a multiplicity of reference video segments in a database; (b) loading a multiplicity of contextually targeted display applications in a memory of the television system, each contextually targeted display application having a respective tracking pixel URL address embedded therein; (c) receiving video fingerprints from the television system at a server, the video fingerprints being derived from television signals for respective portions of a video segment being displayed on the screen; (d) searching the database to identify a reference data set that most matches the video fingerprint; (e) in response to identification of the matching reference data set in operation (d), identifying a contextually targeted display application which is associated with the matching reference data set; (f) in response to identification of the associated contextually targeted display application in operation (e), sending a signal identifying the associated contextually targeted display application to the television system; (g) sending a request for a tracking pixel from the television system to a server using the tracking pixel URL address embedded in the associated contextually targeted display application; (h) sending a tracking pixel from the server to the television system in response to receipt of the request for a tracking pixel; and (i) logging receipt of the request for a tracking pixel in a memory of the server. The request for the tracking pixel may include information identifying the TV system, information indicative of the geographical location of the TV system, information identifying the contextually targeted content, and the time when the request for the tracking pixel was received by the server.


Another aspect of the subject matter disclosed below is a system for automatically logging a viewing event on a screen of a television system the system comprising a television system having a screen, first and second servers, and a database which communicate via a network. The database stores a respective reference data set for each of a multiplicity of reference video segments. The television system is programmed to derive video fingerprints from television signals for a respective portion of a video segment being displayed on the screen. The first server is programmed to: load a multiplicity of contextually targeted display applications in a memory of the television system, each contextually targeted display application having a respective tracking pixel URL address embedded therein; receive the video fingerprints from the television system; search the database to identify a reference data set that most matches the video fingerprint; identify a contextually targeted display application which is associated with the matching reference data set; and send a signal identifying the associated contextually targeted display application to the television system. The TV system is further programmed to send a request for a tracking pixel to the tracking pixel URL address embedded in the associated contextually targeted display application, which tracking pixel URL address is located at the second server. The second server is programmed to receive the request for a tracking pixel from the television system, send the tracking pixel to the television system, and log receipt of the request for a tracking pixel in memory.


A further aspect is a method, performed by a computer system, for automatically logging a viewing event on a screen of a television system, comprising the following operations: (a) storing a respective reference data set for each of a multiplicity of reference video segments in a database; (b) loading a multiplicity of contextually targeted display applications in a memory of the television system, each contextually targeted display application having a respective encoded token embedded therein; (c) receiving video fingerprints from the television system at a server, the video fingerprints being derived from television signals for respective portions of a video segment being displayed on the screen; (d) searching the database to identify a reference data set that most matches the video fingerprint; (e) in response to identification of the matching reference data set in operation (d), identifying a contextually targeted display application which is associated with the matching reference data set; (f) in response to identification of the associated contextually targeted display application in operation (e), sending a signal identifying the associated contextually targeted display application to the television system; (g) sending an encoded token embedded in the associated contextually targeted display application from the television system to an auditing server; (h) decoding the encoded token at the auditing server; and (i) logging receipt of the encoded token in a memory of the auditing server.


Yet another aspect is a system for automatically logging a viewing event on a screen of a television system the system comprising a television system having a screen, first and second servers, and a database which communicate via a network. The database stores a respective reference data set for each of a multiplicity of reference video segments. The television system is programmed to derive video fingerprints from television signals for a respective portion of a video segment being displayed on the screen. The first server is programmed to: load a multiplicity of contextually targeted display applications in a memory of the television system, each contextually targeted display application having a respective encoded token embedded therein; receive video fingerprints from the television system, the video fingerprints being derived from television signals for respective portions of a video segment being displayed on the screen; search the database to identify a reference data set that most matches the video fingerprint; identify a contextually targeted display application which is associated with the matching reference data set; and send a signal identifying the associated contextually targeted display application to the television system. The TV system is further programmed to send an encoded token embedded in the associated contextually targeted display application to the second server. The second server is programmed to receive and decode the encoded token from the television system and log receipt of the encoded token in a memory.


Other aspects of systems and methods for automatically logging viewing events on Internet-connected televisions are disclosed below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1a shows an embodiment enabling specific video segments to be identified by sampling the video frame buffer of a television, creating fingerprints and then comparing those fingerprints to a previously cached database of fingerprints of known programming. If a match is found, the system determines if there is a system event scheduled to be associated with the arrival of the programming and executes the event on the client device while reporting the activity to the central system.



FIG. 1b shows an embodiment of a system and method for enabling a commercial client of the system to monitor specific television programming consumption in real-time, including the viewing of interactive information displayed locally by the television client, using an approach analogous to how Internet websites use tracking pixels to monitor and record specific user's viewing of web pages.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of a system and a method for enabling real-time identification of specific television programming consumption by a service provider and then returning that information to a commercial client of the system without the client's involvement.



FIG. 3 shows a preferred embodiment of a system and method for enabling real-time identification of specific television programming consumption and returning that information in the form of a cookie to a commercial client of the system through a trusted third-party intermediary service in order to confirm delivery, with secondary confirmation returned to the system to verify the third-party's report.



FIG. 4 shows an additional embodiment of a system and method for enabling real-time identification of specific television programming consumption and returning that information to a commercial client of the system through a trusted third-party intermediary service. This embodiment incorporates additional steps to provide control and service verification by the client through the use of encoded tokens managing the display of events according to additional criteria. This is coupled with robust auditing of each involved party's performance using encoded tokens and redundant confirmations that may be cross-checked to enable client verification of service delivery.



FIG. 5 is a flowchart that summarizes an initial setup processing sequence utilized by certain embodiments, such as the example depicted in FIG. 3. This embodiment uses a video tracking URL to call the client server in a manner analogous to how traditional HTML, web pages obtain graphic elements and other files from servers accessed over the Internet.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart that summarizes a second processing sequence utilized by certain embodiments, such as the system depicted in FIG. 3. This embodiment enables relatively more robust tracking and confirmation services to be offered to the customer as compared to certain other embodiments.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart that summarizes an initial setup processing sequence utilized by certain other embodiments, such as the system depicted in FIG. 4. This embodiment accepts a coded token sent by the customer to provide additional data integrity and auditing capabilities.



FIG. 8 is a flowchart that summarizes a second processing sequence utilized by other embodiments, such as the system depicted in FIG. 4. This processing sequence enables the delivery of more efficient customer support features, including even more robust security features.





Reference will hereinafter be made to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings bear the same reference numerals.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The means of using tracking pixels is a legacy from personal computers and web browsers. When a web browser addresses a web site, the web server sends a program to the web browser in the form of hyper-text markup language (HTML), which itself contains many subprogram modules such as Java, Adobe Flash and JavaScript, among others. Furthermore, these elements often come from different servers.


All of the information (text, graphics, videos) is assembled by the HTML program into a single displaying page within the computer's browser. Within the displayed page will be various windows, some with graphics, some with video. Also, on the web page will be advertisements from various sponsors. The ads themselves are made up of HTML code. This HTML code will also contain Java, Flash, JavaScript and other program elements. This code is supplied to the web site operator by the ad agency representing the advertiser.


Hundreds to thousands of lines of computer code instructs the computer web browser on exactly what text, graphics and video to display, including what fonts to use, what color of text, color of background, precisely where text and pictures are displayed or video windows are positioned. Among the program elements supplied by the ad agency will be a graphic element in JPEG or PNG format, just like what comes from a digital camera, called a ‘tracking pixel’. It might be a one-by-one pixel size and set to be 100% transparent so that it does not show in the displayed content. However, when the computer browser executes the HTML code from the web site, when the program gets to the advertisement, the browser calls out across the Internet to the advertiser's servers (one for graphics, one for video (if any), and one for event tracking (auditing)) to get the various elements to form the ad window subsection of the web page. The HTML reads a program element called a GET which instructs the program to call a URL to, among other things, obtain something needed for the rendering and display of a webpage. When executing this instruction (i.e., go get the graphic element at the URL address), it makes a call to the advertiser's server (hereinafter “ad server”) at that URL address. That ad server then sends the element (the tracking pixel, in this example) back to the web browser of the client system. The display of the tracking pixel is irrelevant but the act of the ad server responding to the GET call from the web browser of the client system causes an event to be logged that tells the advertiser that an ad was displayed on a web page in, for example, Weehawken, N.J. The ad server will also log the time and date of the request.


This means of auditing advertisements allows a high degree of confidence in the system compared to a web site operator merely reporting back to the advertiser the number of times a web page was displayed. However, the web site operator also wants to know how many times the ad was displayed so it can track its own advertisement billing. Due to the complexities of web servers and web browser, a server may send one or more pages of HTML, but not all of it gets displayed, so in the case of the example above, neither the web site operator nor the advertiser could know how often the ad had been displayed from only statistics of the web site operator's servers sending out the HTML code upon the request of a web browser in some home.


In accordance with the systems disclosed hereinafter, the foregoing tracking pixel methodology is extended to smart TVs that contain a small computer or processor programmed to execute a web browser application. This computer system inside the TV system can take over the screen of the TV and display the very same content one sees on a personal computer. However, the use of this computer system is usually toward providing a “walled garden” of pre-programmed applications very similar to a smart phone. Such pre-loaded programs (applications) might be an application to watch movies from over the Internet or an application to get the latest news. The resulting user experience is almost identical to a smart phone or iPad experience. In reality, these applications are basically just pre-packaged web scripts usually written in HTML. When the application runs, it invokes a software program call to a web server to send all the information needed to display the web page. Of course, the information received from web site operator by the smart TV is in a format suitable for a larger display 10 feet from the viewer as opposed to an iPad held in one's hands. This programmatic means by itself could not be applied to live television as this Internet language of HTML was intended as a static means of linking information from multiple computers (not to be confused with the ability of webpages to display video within windows on said web page).


The novelty of the video tracking pixel disclosed herein stems from using this underlying technology of tracking pixels, but extending its utility into video by applying video matching whereby the act of identifying a video segment by a video matching means can be used to trigger a program to run in the computer system of a smart TV or set-top box. When that program runs, part of its program code addresses a distant computer server to request that the server send a graphic element back to the program operating in the smart TV or set-top box. The system of video tracking pixels is using existing Internet programmatic language and existing Internet server means used for the prior art of webpage tracking pixels.


The uses of tracking pixels in the context of television provides a means for a third party to verify that a video segment of interest to the third party has been displayed on a television. Again, this video segment of interest could be an advertisement of a company's product or an advertisement of a competitor's product. For example, Competitor A, the Ford Motor company, might like to know how many times an ad of a Competitor B, the Toyota Motor Company, is seen in a particular market. Competitor A can obtain this information by contracting the video tracking pixel service to place an application in every smart TV in a market area of interest, e.g., New York City metropolitan area, that triggers every time a Competitor B ad is displayed on the respective TV. In other uses, if the application that is triggered in the home displays contextually targeted information (information that appears on the television screen in a pop-up window), this event is audited by the same means as the previous example of simply detecting the display of a video segment of interest. That is, the video tracking pixel provides an independent means for the customer of a contextually targeted information service to verify the delivery to and subsequent display of the service to a multiplicity of televisions.


Current means of auditing the display of television programming or advertisements are inexact because, for instance, the buyer of a TV ad spot only knows how many times that buyer's ad was broadcast but not how many TV sets were on and tuned to the channel when the ad was aired. Several companies have devised means to statistically measure household TV viewing events but this is a very inexact science and cannot accurately measure actually viewing. For instance, at a commercial break, the viewer might tune away to check another channel and miss the advertisement. By means of the video tracking pixel methodology disclosed in detail below, the actual viewing of the ad (or any video segment of interest) can be measured. If the ad involves contextually targeted information, the display of this additional information can likewise be verified.


Methods for matching viewed video with reference video stored in a database will now be described with reference to FIGS. 1a and 1b, which depict, on a high level, components of systems for enabling specific video segments to be identified by sampling the video frame buffer of a television. The systems shown in FIGS. 1a and 1b represent useful examples to provide background for additional embodiments of systems and methods disclosed below with reference to FIGS. 2-4.


As can be seen in FIG. 1a, a matching server 101 (of a matching server system) receives reference video feeds 102 of a plurality of TV channels or other video information, such as feature films or archival video footage, and builds a reference database 103 of their digital fingerprints that is stored in a computer memory. The fingerprints are composed of samples of at least a subset of the received video frames. These samples may be, but are not limited to, one or more video sub-areas of a video frame further processed by averaging or other techniques known to those skilled in the art.


The matching server 101 preferably comprises a multiplicity of centrally located matching servers, only one of which is depicted in FIG. 1a. Each matching server may in turn comprise a multiplicity of processors programmed to perform different functions, such video segment recognition and contextual targeting management. Each matching server in turn may communicate with a respective multiplicity of remotely located TV systems, only one of which is depicted in FIG. 1a. The system partly depicted in FIG. 1a (and the systems partly depicted in FIGS. 1b and 2-4) will be described with reference to a single TV system communicating with a single matching server, although it should be understood that in practice multiple TV systems will communicate with multiple matching servers.


Referring to FIG. 1a, the remotely located TV system 108 is capable of communicating with the matching server 101 via communication channels 106, 107 and 115 (e.g., the Internet). The TV system 108 may be a smart TV or a TV monitor with an external set-top controller. Video programming from a TV video frame buffer (not shown in FIG. 1a) is received by a TV client 109. The TV client 109 is a software application operating in the computer or processor of TV System 108. The TV system samples the data from the TV video frame buffer and generates unknown (i.e., not yet identified) video fingerprints which are sent via communication channel 107 to the matching server 101 to be matched with data in the reference database 103.


More specifically, the video fingerprints that result from the processing in the TV system 108 are passed via communication channel 107 to a video segment recognition processor 105 that is part of the matching server 101. The fingerprints of the unknown video are generated by the TV client 109 using an algorithm which is similar to the algorithm used by the matching server 101 to store the reference videos in the reference database 103. The video segment recognition processor 105 continuously searches the reference database 103, attempting to find a match of the incoming video fingerprints using a search means according to methods known in the art such as the method taught by Neumeier et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 8,595,781, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. When video segment recognition processor 105 finds a match of a known fingerprint in reference database 103 with an unknown fingerprint of a video segment received from TV system 108, the video segment recognition processor 105 sends a message to a contextual targeting manager 104 identifying the video segment being displayed by the TV system 108. (As used herein, the term “manager” refers to a processor or computer programmed to execute application software for performing a data management or data processing function.) The contextual targeting manager 104 determines what, if any, events are to be associated with the detection of the newly identified video fingerprint from TV client 109. Upon determining the appropriate response, the contextual targeting manager 104 sends a coded trigger to an application manager 110 of the TV system 108 via communication channel 106. (The application manager 110 is software running on the same processor in TV system 108 that the TV client software is running on.) The application manager 110 launches and triggers or otherwise signals the specific application that has been determined to be associated with that event.


More specifically, the application manager 110 sends a trigger signal to a contextually targeted display application 112 via a communication channel 111. The TV system 108 may be loaded with multiple contextually targeted display applications. (The contextually targeted display application 112 is software running on the same processor in TV system 108 that the TV client software is running on.) In one example, a contextually targeted display application 112 may be invoked to display a related graphic image overlaid on the video screen of the TV system 108 with information related to, for example, a television advertisement currently being displayed. The graphic overlay comes from either an embedded graphic stored within the contextually targeted display application (previously downloaded from the contextual targeting manager 104). Or the image can come from an external website when the contextually targeted display application renders the overlay. Similar to a web browser, the contextually targeted display application can contain URLs that point to external web sites for requesting graphics and/or videos.


Following display of the overlay, the contextually targeted display application 112 sends an event complete message via communication channel 115 to the contextual targeting manager 104, which records occurrence of the action. This last step is useful when an advertiser or another third party wishes to receive confirmation of the display on a TV system 108 of the contextually targeted additional information overlay or even just that a video segment, such as an advertisement or public service announcement, has been displayed. In these cases, the contextual targeting manager 104 might provide, for example, a log file of occurrences by time and location to a third party.



FIG. 1b shows how one embodiment of the system would operate if configured in a way similar to how many Internet websites monitor content consumption. Video programming from a TV video frame buffer of TV system 108 is received by the TV client 109. As previously noted, the TV client 109 is a software application operating in the computer or processor of TV System 108, which is a smart TV or a TV monitor with an external set-top controller. The video stream is processed according to methods known in the art such as taught by Neumeier et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 8,595,781.


The TV client 109 being monitored sends video fingerprints of what is being viewed, consisting of multiple samples per second of the unknown programming being displayed on the TV 109, to the matching server 101. These video fingerprints, which contain “clues” regarding the video segment being viewed, are sent via communication channel 107 to the video segment recognition processor 105, which attempts to match the “clues” with data in the reference database 103 to identify the programming being viewed and a specific segment of the same in the samples sent, and then passes a token pointing to that information and the associated metadata for it to the contextual targeting manager 104. If and when such a segment of interest is identified, the contextual targeting manager 104 then determines what, if any, actions are to be performed. That determination is sent via communication channel 106 to the application manager 110 of TV system 108, which routes the information (e.g., in the form of a software script) via a communication channel 111 to the contextually targeted display application 112. The contextually targeted display application 112 then sends a request for a piece of content to display via a communication channel 113 (e.g., the Internet) to an address based on a URI embedded in the software script that was provided by the application manager 110. This request addresses a client server 116 somewhere on the Internet. The location of the client server 116 is not material to the process disclosed herein (i.e., the client server 116 can be located anywhere). The client server 116 returns a data item, perhaps a small graphic (i.e., tracking pixel) with transparent pixels (e.g., a .png file), via a communication channel 114. Upon receipt of this data item, the contextually targeted display application 112 assembles the remainder of the display elements, if any, and presents an image on the screen of the TV system 108, much like a web page is made up of addressable elements to be assembled by a web browser for display on a screen of a personal computer. The request for the specific graphic element sent via communication channel 113 by the contextually targeted display application 112 provides information to the commercial client's server 116 that the TV system 108 has viewed the video segment of interest and that a contextually related graph overlay has been presented. For example, the client server 116 may log that event when it sends the tracking pixel via communication channel 114 in response to receipt of a GET call via communication channel 113. (As previously noted, the tracking pixel is not displayed on the TV system. The primary purpose for sending the tracking pixel in response to the GET call is to complete the request so that the GET call will not be repeated.)


Another task of the contextually targeted display application 112 might be to pass a confirmation (i.e., event logging) message via communication channel 115 back to the matching server 101 to be logged for perhaps billing purposes or network reliability monitoring. The disadvantage of this embodiment is that it requires that the commercial client be an active participant in the process, burdened with maintaining its own client server 116 with a database of graphic elements (also known to the art as tracking pixels) while logging specifics of the video segment matches found based on the received requests for the graphics.


Optionally, a particular contextually targeted display application 112 can be triggered to send a request for a tracking pixel, with other information including a TV system identifier, location, etc., without requesting any content to be displayed in a graphic overlay on the TV screen. Since the request for a tracking pixel was triggered by the matching server 102 identifying an associated video segment being viewed, the client server 116 could log that event (i.e., the display of the identified video segment on the identified TV system) upon receipt of the request for tracking pixel. This methodology would allow a client server to determine the number of TV systems which viewed a particular video segment within a region of interest even when contextually targeted material is not being supplied.



FIG. 2 depicts how another embodiment of the system would operate if configured in a way to offload the administrative burden for the commercial client of maintaining databases of graphic elements (“tracking pixels”) and corresponding access logging means on the client server 216. Video programming from a TV video frame buffer (not shown in FIG. 2) is received by a TV client 209. The TV system 208 samples the data from the TV video frame buffer and generates unknown (i.e., not yet identified) video fingerprints. The fingerprints of the unknown video are generated by the TV client 209 using an algorithm which is similar to the algorithm used by the matching server 201 to store the reference videos in the reference database 203. The video fingerprints contain “clues” regarding what is being viewed consisting of multiple samples per second of the unknown programming being displayed on the screen of the TV system 208. These clues are sent via communication channel 207 to the matching server 201 to be matched with data in the reference database 203. More specifically, the clues that result from the processing in the TV system 208 are passed via communication channel 207 to the video segment recognition processor 205. The video segment recognition processor 205 continuously searches the reference database 203 attempting to find a match of the incoming video fingerprints. When video segment recognition processor 205 finds a match of a known fingerprint in reference database 203 with an unknown fingerprint of a video segment received from TV system 208, the video segment recognition processor 205 sends a message to a contextual targeting manager 204 identifying the video segment being displayed by the TV system 208. The contextual targeting manager 204 determines what, if any, events are to be associated with the detection of the newly identified video fingerprint from TV client 209. Upon determining the appropriate response, the contextual targeting manager 204 sends a coded trigger to an application manager 210 of the TV system 208 via communication channel 206. The application manager 210 launches and triggers or otherwise signals the specific contextually targeted display application 212 that has been determined to be associated with that trigger and event. More specifically, the application manager 210 sends a trigger signal to a contextually targeted display application 212 via a communication channel 211. In one example, a contextually targeted display application 112 may be invoked to display a related graphic image overlaid on the video screen of the TV system 208 with information related to, for example, a television advertisement currently being displayed. The contextually targeted display application 212 sends an event complete message via communication channel 215 to the contextual targeting manager 204, which records occurrence of the action for internal tracking and accounting purposes. The contextual targeting manager 204 also sends a confirmation report via communication channel 217 (e.g., the Internet) to the client server 216 to confirm the detection of the video segment displayed on TV system 208. While reasonably efficient, this embodiment lacks the ability to support the needs of the commercial client to ensure sufficient accuracy of the video identification information received.



FIG. 3 shows how a particularly advantageous embodiment of the system would operate when configured in a way that interposes a display confirmation auditing server 318 as part of the process This enables the commercial client server 316 to obtain independent verification of the numbers of “hits” or viewings of their advertisement or some other particular video segment. Although the display confirmation auditing server 318 is shown separate from the client server 316 in FIG. 3, the two servers may be combined into one server. In the case where the display confirmation auditing server is separate, server 318 may be operated by a trusted third party.


Still referring to FIG. 3, video programming from a TV video frame buffer (not shown in FIG. 3) is received by a TV client 309. The TV system 308 samples the data from the TV video frame buffer and generates unknown (i.e., not yet identified) video fingerprints. The fingerprints of the unknown video are generated by the TV client 309 using an algorithm which is similar to the algorithm used by the matching server 301 to store the reference videos in the reference database 303. The video fingerprints contain “clues” regarding what is being viewed consisting of multiple samples per second of the unknown programming being displayed on the screen of the TV system 308. These clues are sent via communication channel 307 to the matching server 301 to be matched with data in the reference database 303. More specifically, the clues that result from the processing in the TV system 308 are passed via communication channel 307 to the video segment recognition processor 305. The video segment recognition processor 305 continuously searches the reference database 303 attempting to find a match of the incoming video fingerprints. When video segment recognition processor 305 finds a match of a known fingerprint in reference database 303 with an unknown fingerprint of a video segment received from TV system 308, the video segment recognition processor 305 sends a message to a contextual targeting manager 304 identifying the video segment being displayed by the TV system 308. The contextual targeting manager 304 determines what, if any, events are to be associated with the detection of the newly identified video fingerprint from TV client 309. Upon determining the appropriate response, the contextual targeting manager 304 sends a coded trigger to an application manager 310 of the TV system 308 via communication channel 306. The application manager 310 launches and triggers or otherwise signals the specific contextually targeted display application 312 that has been determined to be associated with that event. More specifically, the application manager 310 sends a trigger signal to that contextually targeted display application 312 via a communication channel 311. In one example, a contextually targeted display application 312 may be invoked to display a related graphic image overlaid on the video screen of the TV system 308 with information related to, for example, a television advertisement currently being displayed. The contextually targeted display application 312 is programmed to notify the confirmation auditing server 318 via communication channel 315a that the video segment of interest (typically identified by its time stamp and associated metadata provided by the matching server 301) has been viewed by a certain TV system 308 that has been appropriately identified by device, time, location, or other information through the associated metadata. This notification may include a request that the client server 316 (maintained by the commercial client for the video segment viewing detection service) send a tracking pixel, which tracking pixel is sent via communication channel 315b. The confirmation auditing server 318 in turn passes an audited event report containing a viewing detection event indicator and associated metadata via a communication channel 319 to the client server 316.


Optionally, the contextually targeted display application 312 also sends a confirmation of the event via communication channel 317b to the contextual targeting manager 304, thereby providing a single source for both billing and verification data, for example. Optionally, the confirmation auditing server 318 may also provide a message via a communication channel 317a to the contextual targeting manager 304 indicating that the client server 316 has been notified. This means might be used to maintain an internal display confirmation audit trail of the confirmation auditing server 318.



FIG. 4 depicts yet another embodiment of the system with certain additional advantages. As seen in FIG. 4, the video client 409 of the TV system 408, such as a television set or other video display means, receives video programming. As in the other embodiments, video programming from a TV video frame buffer (not shown in FIG. 4) is received by a TV client 409. The TV system 408 samples the data from the TV video frame buffer and generates unknown (i.e., not yet identified) video fingerprints. The fingerprints of the unknown video are generated by the TV client 409 using an algorithm which is similar to the algorithm used by the matching server 401 to store the reference videos in the reference database 403. The video fingerprints contain “clues” regarding what is being viewed consisting of multiple samples per second of the unknown programming being displayed on the screen of the TV system 408. These clues are sent via communication channel 407 to the matching server 401 to be matched with data in the reference database 403. More specifically, the clues that result from the processing in the TV system 408 are passed via communication channel 407 to the video segment recognition processor 405. The video segment recognition processor 405 continuously searches the reference database 403 attempting to find a match of the incoming video fingerprints. When video segment recognition processor 405 finds a match of a known fingerprint in reference database 403 with an unknown fingerprint of a video segment received from TV system 408, the video segment recognition processor 405 sends a message to a contextual targeting manager 404 identifying the video segment being displayed by the TV system 408. The contextual targeting manager 404 determines what, if any, events are to be associated with the detection of the newly identified video fingerprint from TV client 409. Upon determining the appropriate response, the contextual targeting manager 404 sends a coded trigger to an application manager 410 of the TV system 408 via communication channel 406. The application manager 410 launches and triggers or otherwise signals the specific application that has been determined to be associated with that event.


More specifically, the video segment recognition processor 405 attempts to match the received clues to the reference data in the database 403 to identify the programming and specific segment of same in the samples sent, and passes a token pointing to that information and the associated metadata for it to the contextual targeting manager 404. If and when such a segment of interest is identified, the contextual targeting manager 404 then determines what, if any, actions are to be performed. When an action is to take place on the TV system 408, that determination is sent via communication channel 406 to the application manager 410 along with a token and/or encryption seed (public key value) received from the client server 416 via a communication channel 421. The token and/or encryption seed may subsequently be used by client server 416 to uniquely identify, for verification or other purposes, any event, action, or metric associated with the token. The application manager 410 then routes that information via communication channel 411 to the contextually targeted display application 412, which then displays a related graphic image overlaid on the video screen of the TV system 408. The contextually targeted display application 412 is programmed to notify the confirmation auditing server 418 via communication channel 415a that the video segment of interest (typically identified by its time stamp and associated metadata provided by the matching server 401) has been viewed by a certain TV system 408 that has been appropriately identified by device, time, location, or other information through the associated metadata. This notification may include a request that the client server 416 send a tracking pixel, which tracking pixel is sent via communication channel 415b. The confirmation auditing server 418 in turn passes an audited event report containing a viewing detection event indicator and associated metadata via a communication channel 419 to the client server 416.


Optionally, the contextually targeted display application 412 also sends a confirmation of the event via communication channel 417b to the contextual targeting manager 404. Optionally, confirmation auditing server 418 may also provide a message via a communication channel 417a to the contextual targeting manager 404 indicating that the client server 416 has been notified. Optionally, the contextual targeting manager 404 sends an unaudited event report to the client server 416 via a communication channel 420.


It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that a token as described above can be gainfully applied to the task of identifying confirmations received by the third-party verification service 418 from the TV system 408. For example, the client server 416 could supply a unique token for each of the top 120 demographic marketing areas (DMA) of the United States. It would then be the responsibility of the matching server 401 to distribute the respective tokens to TV systems residing in the respective DMAs in advance of the anticipated use of the tokens. When the system disclosed herein detects a video segment, such as a TV advertisement, and the TV system 408 is instructed to send a message to the third-party verification service 418, a token identifying the DMA region is passed as part of the message. This assists the client server 416 in classifying the collected data. The tokens can be created for classification tasks in addition to the example of regional identification disclosed herein. Also a plurality of combinations of parameters can be assigned to tokens or multiple tokens can be distributed to the TV systems for any combination of useful metrics.


If the client has supplied an encryption seed as a token or in addition to a token, such as a public key value of a public key/private key encryption pair, the encryption seed may be algorithmically processed by the computing means of the TV system 408 to generate a unique encrypted code that, when passed to the third-party verification service 418, is further passed back to the client server 416 for positive identification of specific TV systems and any video segments viewed upon those specific TV systems.



FIG. 5 presents a flowchart that summarizes a key setup process sequence utilized by certain embodiments, such as the system depicted in FIG. 3. In this flowchart, the process is initiated with a first step 501, which involves the reception of a video tracking pixel universal resource locator (URL) from the client server 316 by the matching server 301 from the display confirmation auditing means 318 via communication channel 317a. Then in step 102, this URL is embedded in a contextually targeted display application 312 associated with the commercial customer (i.e., client server 316). In step 503, this contextually targeted display application is then sent to selected TV clients of respective TV systems 308, such as smart TVs or set-top boxes, in the regional, metropolitan, or local viewing area of interest to the commercial customer. In the next step 504, an event execution list is created via the contextual targeting manager 304. The final step 505 in this process is to send application manager 310 (in the targeted TV system 308) an event list which associates event trigger codes from the contextual targeting manager 304 with specific contextually targeted display applications 312 stored in the memory means of the TV system 308. The receipt of an event trigger code from the contextual targeting manager 304 will cause application manager 310 to launch a specific contextually targeted display application 312 associated with that code.



FIG. 6 shows a flowchart that summarizes a second processing sequence utilized by certain embodiments, an example of which is the system depicted in FIG. 3. As the process starts in step 601, the TV system 308 receives one or more contextually targeted display applications 312 from the matching server 301. In step 602, the application manager 310 receives an event trigger list from contextual targeting manager 304 which matches the contextually targeted display applications to trigger codes sent via contextual targeting manager 304. In step 603, the TV client 309 sends video information from the TV display to the video segment recognition processor 305, which is a subsystem of the matching server 301. In step 604, the video segment recognition processor 305 monitors video from a plurality of TV systems and reports matches of unknown video segments from those TV systems to known video segments stored in a database associated with the matching server 301. The result of this identification (i.e., matching) of the unknown video segments is sent to the contextual targeting manager 304. In step 605, the contextual targeting manager 304 matches identified video segments to a list of events associated with the identified video segment. In step 606, when a particular video segment matches with an associated event, it causes the contextual targeting manager 304 to send a trigger to application manager 310, which is part of the TV system 308. In step 607, when the application manager 310 receives a trigger from the contextual targeting manager 304, application manager 310 launches the contextually targeted display application 312 that has been associated with the received trigger.



FIG. 6 assumes that the display confirmation auditing server 318 is incorporated in the client server 316. In this configuration, upon execution, the contextually targeted display application 312 addresses the URL embedded in the application (step 608) via communication channel 315a to obtain the designated video tracking pixel from the client server 316. Step 609 involves the client server 316 sending the tracking pixel via communication channel 315b and recording the request for the tracking pixel to confirm that the associated contextually targeted display application 312 has been run on TV system 308. In step 610, the contextually targeted display application 312 also sends the matching server 301 an event confirmation in the form of a token to confirm execution of the contracted service, completing the process.



FIG. 7 presents a flowchart that summarizes a key setup process sequence utilized by certain embodiments, such as the system depicted in FIG. 4. In this flowchart, the process is initiated by the first step 701, which involves the reception of a video tracking pixel URL from the client server 316 by the matching server 401 via a communication channel 421. In step 702, the URL with an associated data token is embedded in a contextually targeted display application associated with the commercial customer (client server 416) for the service. In step 703, the contextually targeted display application 412 is then sent to a selected TV system 408 in the regional or local viewing area of interest. In the next step 704, an event execution list is created via the contextually targeting manager 404. The final step 705 in this process is to send application manager 410 an event list which associates trigger codes to be received from the contextual targeting manager 404 with contextually targeted display applications to be executed (launched) upon receipt of those trigger codes by the application manager 410.



FIG. 8 shows a flowchart that summarizes a modified processing sequence utilized by certain embodiments, an example of which is the system depicted in FIG. 4. As the process starts in step 801, the application manager 410 receives one or more contextually targeted display applications from the contextual targeting manager 404 of the matching server 401. In step 802, the application manager 410 receives a cue list from the contextual targeting manager 404 which matches contextually targeted display applications to the trigger codes. In step 803, the TV client 409 sends video information from the TV display to the video segment recognition processor 405 in the matching server 401. In step 804, the video segment recognition processor 405 monitors video from a plurality of TV systems and reports identified video segments from those TV systems to the contextual targeting manager 404. In step 805, the contextual targeting manager 404 matches identified video segments to a list of events associated with the identified video segment. In step 806, when a particular video segment matches with an associated event, it causes the contextual targeting manager 404 to send a trigger to application. manager 410 in TV system 408. In step 807, when the application manager 410 receives a trigger from the contextual targeting manager 404, the application manager 410 launches the contextually targeted display application 412 which the application manager 410 determines to be associated with that trigger.



FIG. 8 assumes that the display confirmation auditing server 318 is incorporated in the client server 316. In this configuration, upon execution, the launched contextually targeted display application 412 in step 808 calls the URL embedded in that application and sends a data token that may also be embedded in that application or, alternatively, previously stored in a known location in a memory of the TV system 408. Step 809 involves the client server 416 recording a request for a tracking pixel to confirm that the associated contextually targeted display application 412 has been run on TV system 408. In step 810, the contextually targeted display application 412 also sends an event confirmation in the form of a token to the matching server 401 to confirm execution of the contracted service, completing the process.


While systems and methods have been described with reference to various embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the teachings herein. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt the concepts and reductions to practice disclosed herein to a particular situation. Accordingly, it is intended that the subject matter covered by the claims not be limited to the disclosed embodiments.


As used in the claims, the term “computer system” should be construed broadly to encompass a system having at least one computer or processor, and which may have multiple computers or processors that communicate through a network or bus. As used in the preceding sentence, the terms “computer” and “processor” both refer to devices comprising a processing unit (e.g., a central processing unit) and some form of memory (i.e., computer-readable medium) for storing a program which is readable by the processing unit.


The method claims set forth hereinafter should not be construed to require that the steps recited therein be performed in alphabetical order (alphabetical ordering in the claims is used solely for the purpose of referencing previously recited steps) or in the order in which they are recited. Nor should they be construed to exclude any portions of two or more steps being performed concurrently or alternatingly.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: storing multiple reference data sets, wherein a reference data set is associated with a reference video segment;receiving a video fingerprint, wherein the video fingerprint is generated by a media system based on one or more frames displayed by the media system, and wherein the one or more frames are associated with an unidentified video segment;identifying a reference data set that is determined to match the video fingerprint;determining that an identified video segment corresponds to the unidentified video segment, wherein the identified video segment is determined based on the identified reference data set;determining content associated with the identified video segment;sending information associated with the content, wherein the information is addressed to the media system, and wherein the information causes the media system to display the content;generating a message indicative of a viewing event associated with the media system, wherein the message is generated in response to the identified video segment being determined; andautomatically sending the message in response to the viewing event, wherein receiving the message at an additional server causes the additional server to log the viewing event.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the message includes information identifying the media system.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the message includes information indicative of a geographical location of the media system.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the viewing event includes the display of at least a portion of the identified video segment by the media system.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein a matching system performs the storing, the receiving, the identifying, the determining, the generating, and the sending.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiple reference data sets are stored in a database.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the message includes an identification of the identified video segment.
  • 8. A system comprising: one or more processors; anda non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: store multiple reference data sets, wherein a reference data set is associated with a reference video segment;receive a video fingerprint, wherein the video fingerprint is generated by a media system based on one or more frames displayed by the media system, and wherein the one or more frames are associated with an unidentified video segment;identify a reference data set that is determined to match the video fingerprint;determine that an identified video segment corresponds to the unidentified video segment, wherein the identified video segment is determined based on the identified reference data set;determine content associated with the identified video segment;send information associated with the content, wherein the information is addressed to the media system, and wherein the information causes the media system to display the content;generate a message indicative of a viewing event associated with the media system, wherein the message is generated in response to the identified video segment being determined; andautomatically send the message in response to the viewing event, wherein receiving the message at an additional server causes the additional server to log the viewing event.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the message includes information identifying the media system.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the message includes information indicative of a geographical location of the media system.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the viewing event includes the display of at least a portion of the identified video segment by the media system.
  • 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the multiple reference data sets are stored in a database.
  • 13. The system of claim 8, wherein the message includes an identification of the identified video segment.
  • 14. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of a media system, including instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: store multiple reference data sets, wherein a reference data set is associated with a reference video segment;receive a video fingerprint, wherein the video fingerprint is generated by a media system based on one or more frames displayed by the media system, and wherein the one or more frames are associated with an unidentified video segment;identify a reference data set that is determined to match the video fingerprint;determine that an identified video segment corresponds to the unidentified video segment, wherein the identified video segment is determined based on the identified reference data set;determine content associated with the identified video segment;send information associated with the content, wherein the information is addressed to the media system, and wherein the information causes the media system to display the content;generate a message indicative of a viewing event associated with the media system, wherein the message is generated in response to the identified video segment being determined; andautomatically send the message in response to the viewing event, wherein receiving the message at an additional server causes the additional server to log the viewing event.
  • 15. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the message includes information identifying the media system.
  • 16. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium claim 14, wherein the message includes information indicative of a geographical location of the media system.
  • 17. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the viewing event includes the display of at least a portion of the identified video segment by the media system.
  • 18. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein a matching system performs the storing, the receiving, the identifying, the determining, the generating, and the sending.
  • 19. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the multiple reference data sets are stored in a database.
  • 20. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the message includes an identification of the identified video segment.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/763,158, filed Jul. 23, 2015, entitled “MONITORING INDIVIDUAL VIEWING OF TELEVISION EVENTS USING TRACKING PIXELS AND COOKIES,” which is a National Stage Entry of PCT/US14/72255, filed Dec. 23, 2014, entitled “MONITORING INDIVIDUAL VIEWING OF TELEVISION EVENTS USING TRACKING PIXELS AND COOKIES,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/920,086, filed Dec. 23, 2013. The present application is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/551,933, filed Nov. 24, 2014, entitled “METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING VIDEO SEGMENTS AND DISPLAYING CONTEXTUALLY TARGETED CONTENT ON A CONNECTED TELEVISION.” The entire contents of each of the patent applications identified above are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (285)
Number Name Date Kind
4677466 Lert, Jr. et al. Jun 1987 A
4697209 Kiewit et al. Sep 1987 A
4739398 Thomas et al. Apr 1988 A
5019899 Boles et al. May 1991 A
5193001 Kerdranvrat Mar 1993 A
5319453 Copriviza et al. Jun 1994 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5481294 Thomas et al. Jan 1996 A
5557334 Legate Sep 1996 A
5572246 Ellis et al. Nov 1996 A
5812286 Li Sep 1998 A
5826165 Echeita et al. Oct 1998 A
5918223 Blum et al. Jun 1999 A
6008802 Goldschmidt et al. Dec 1999 A
6025837 Matthews, III et al. Feb 2000 A
6035177 Moses et al. Mar 2000 A
6064764 Bhaskaran et al. May 2000 A
6381362 Deshpande et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415438 Blackketter et al. Jul 2002 B1
6463585 Hendricks et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469749 Dimitrova Oct 2002 B1
6577346 Perlman Jun 2003 B1
6577405 Kranz et al. Jun 2003 B2
6628801 Powell et al. Sep 2003 B2
6647548 Lu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6675174 Bolle et al. Jan 2004 B1
6771316 Iggulden Aug 2004 B1
6804659 Graham et al. Oct 2004 B1
6978470 Swix et al. Dec 2005 B2
6990453 Wang et al. Jan 2006 B2
7028327 Dougherty et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039930 Goodman et al. May 2006 B1
7050068 Bastos et al. May 2006 B1
7051351 Goldman et al. May 2006 B2
7064796 Roy et al. Jun 2006 B2
7089575 Agnihotri et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098959 Mishima et al. Aug 2006 B2
7136875 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 B2
7210157 Devara Apr 2007 B2
7346512 Wang et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356830 Dimitrova Apr 2008 B1
7421723 Harkness et al. Sep 2008 B2
7545984 Kiel et al. Jun 2009 B1
7590998 Hanley Sep 2009 B2
7623823 Zito et al. Nov 2009 B2
7787696 Wilhelm et al. Aug 2010 B2
7793318 Deng Sep 2010 B2
7933451 Kloer Apr 2011 B2
8001571 Schwartz et al. Aug 2011 B1
8037496 Begeja et al. Oct 2011 B1
8094872 Yagnik et al. Jan 2012 B1
8171004 Kaminski, Jr. et al. May 2012 B1
8171030 Peira et al. May 2012 B2
8175413 Ioffe et al. May 2012 B1
8189945 Stojancic et al. May 2012 B2
8195689 Ramanathan et al. Jun 2012 B2
8229227 Stojancic et al. Jul 2012 B2
8335786 Peira et al. Dec 2012 B2
8364703 Ramanathan et al. Jan 2013 B2
8385644 Stojancic et al. Feb 2013 B2
8392789 Biscondi et al. Mar 2013 B2
8494234 Djordjevic et al. Jul 2013 B1
8522283 Laligand et al. Aug 2013 B2
8595781 Neumeier et al. Nov 2013 B2
8619877 McDowell Dec 2013 B2
8625902 Baheti et al. Jan 2014 B2
8769854 Battaglia Jul 2014 B1
8776105 Sinha et al. Jul 2014 B2
8832723 Sinha et al. Sep 2014 B2
8856817 Sinha et al. Oct 2014 B2
8893167 Sinha et al. Nov 2014 B2
8893168 Sinha et al. Nov 2014 B2
8898714 Neumeier et al. Nov 2014 B2
8918804 Sinha et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918832 Sinha et al. Dec 2014 B2
8930980 Neumeier et al. Jan 2015 B2
8959202 Haitsma et al. Feb 2015 B2
9055309 Neumeier et al. Jun 2015 B2
9055335 Neumeier et al. Jun 2015 B2
9071868 Neumeier et al. Jun 2015 B2
9094714 Neumeier et al. Jul 2015 B2
9094715 Neumeier et al. Jul 2015 B2
9262671 Unzueta Feb 2016 B2
9368021 Touloumtzis Jun 2016 B2
9449090 Neumeier et al. Sep 2016 B2
9465867 Hoarty Oct 2016 B2
9838753 Neumeier et al. Dec 2017 B2
9955192 Neumeier et al. Apr 2018 B2
20010039658 Walton Nov 2001 A1
20010044992 Jahrling Nov 2001 A1
20020026635 Wheeler et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020054069 Britt et al. May 2002 A1
20020054695 Bjorn et al. May 2002 A1
20020056088 Silva, Jr. et al. May 2002 A1
20020059633 Harkness et al. May 2002 A1
20020083060 Wang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020100041 Rosenberg et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020105907 Bruekers et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120925 Logan Aug 2002 A1
20020122042 Bates Sep 2002 A1
20020162117 Pearson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162118 Levy et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030026422 Gerheim et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030086341 Wells May 2003 A1
20030105794 Jasinschi Jun 2003 A1
20030121037 Swix et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121046 Roy et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030147561 Faibish et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030188321 Shoff et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040045020 Witt et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059708 Dean et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040183825 Stauder et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040216171 Barone et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040221237 Foote et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040226035 Hauser Nov 2004 A1
20040240562 Bargeron et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050015795 Iggulden Jan 2005 A1
20050015796 Bruckner et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027766 Ben Feb 2005 A1
20050066352 Herley Mar 2005 A1
20050120372 Itakura Jun 2005 A1
20050172312 Lienhart et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050207416 Rajkotia Sep 2005 A1
20050209065 Schlosser et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235318 Grauch et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060029286 Lim et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029368 Harville Feb 2006 A1
20060031914 Dakss et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060133647 Werner et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153296 Deng Jul 2006 A1
20060155952 Haas Jul 2006 A1
20060173831 Basso et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060187358 Lienhart et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193506 Dorphan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195857 Wheeler et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195860 Eldering et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060245724 Hwang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060245725 Lim Nov 2006 A1
20060253330 Maggio et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060294561 Grannan et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070033608 Eigeldinger Feb 2007 A1
20070050832 Wright et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061724 Slothouber et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061831 Savoor et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083901 Bond Apr 2007 A1
20070094696 Sakai Apr 2007 A1
20070109449 Cheung May 2007 A1
20070113263 Chatani May 2007 A1
20070139563 Zhong Jun 2007 A1
20070143796 Malik Jun 2007 A1
20070168409 Cheung Jul 2007 A1
20070180459 Smithpeters et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192782 Ramaswamy Aug 2007 A1
20070250901 McIntire et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070261070 Brown et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070261075 Glasberg Nov 2007 A1
20070271300 Ramaswamy Nov 2007 A1
20070274537 Srinivasan Nov 2007 A1
20070300280 Turner et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080044102 Ekin Feb 2008 A1
20080046945 Hanley Feb 2008 A1
20080089551 Heather et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080138030 Bryan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155588 Roberts et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155627 O'Connor et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172690 Kanojia et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080208891 Wang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080240562 Fukuda et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263620 Berkvens et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276266 Huchital et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080310731 Stojancic et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090007195 Beyabani Jan 2009 A1
20090024923 Hartwig et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028517 Shen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090052784 Covell et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090087027 Eaton et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090088878 Otsuka et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090100361 Abello et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090131861 Braig et al. May 2009 A1
20090172728 Shkedi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090172746 Aldrey et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175538 Bronstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090213270 Ismert et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090235312 Morad et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100010648 Bull et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100083299 Nelson Apr 2010 A1
20100115543 Falcon May 2010 A1
20100125870 Ukawa et al. May 2010 A1
20100166257 Wredenhagen Jul 2010 A1
20100199295 Katpelly et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235486 White et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100253838 Garg et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100269138 Krikorian et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100306805 Neumeier et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100306808 Neumeier et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015996 Kassoway et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026761 Radhakrishnan et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041154 Olson Feb 2011 A1
20110055552 Francis et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110096955 Voloshynovskiy et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110251987 Buchheit Apr 2011 A1
20110247042 Mallinson Oct 2011 A1
20110289099 Quan Nov 2011 A1
20110299770 Vaddadi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120017240 Shkedi Jan 2012 A1
20120054143 Doig et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120076357 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120095958 Pereira et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120117584 Gordon May 2012 A1
20120158511 Lucero et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120174155 Mowrey et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120177249 Levy et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185566 Nagasaka Jul 2012 A1
20120272259 Cortes Oct 2012 A1
20120294586 Weaver et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120317240 Wang Dec 2012 A1
20120324494 Burger et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130007191 Klappert et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130042262 Riethmueller Feb 2013 A1
20130050564 Adams et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130054356 Richman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067523 Etsuko et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130070847 Iwamoto et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130108173 Lienhart et al. May 2013 A1
20130139209 Urrabazo et al. May 2013 A1
20130202150 Sinha et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130209065 Yeung Aug 2013 A1
20130212609 Sinha et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130290502 Bilobrov Oct 2013 A1
20130297727 Levy Nov 2013 A1
20130318096 Cheung Nov 2013 A1
20140016696 Nelson Jan 2014 A1
20140052737 Ramanathan et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140082663 Neumeier et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088742 Srinivasan Mar 2014 A1
20140123165 Mukherjee et al. May 2014 A1
20140130092 Kunisetty May 2014 A1
20140188487 Perez Gonzalez Jul 2014 A1
20140193027 Scherf Jul 2014 A1
20140195548 Harron Jul 2014 A1
20140201769 Neumeier et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201772 Neumeier et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201787 Neumeier et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140219554 Yamaguchi et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140237576 Zhang Aug 2014 A1
20140258375 Munoz Sep 2014 A1
20140270489 Jaewhan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270504 Baum et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270505 McCarthy Sep 2014 A1
20140282671 McMillan Sep 2014 A1
20140293794 Zhong et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140344880 Geller et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150026728 Carter et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150040074 Hofmann Feb 2015 A1
20150100979 Moskowitz et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150112988 Pereira et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120839 Kannan et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150121409 Zhang et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150128161 Conrad et al. May 2015 A1
20150163545 Freed et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150181311 Navin et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150256891 Kim et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150302890 Ergen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150382075 Neumeier et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160227261 Neumeier et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160227291 Shaw et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160286244 Chang et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160307043 Neumeier Oct 2016 A1
20160314794 Leitman et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160353172 Miller et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160359791 Zhang et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170017645 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170017651 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170017652 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170019716 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170019719 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170026671 Neumeier et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170031573 Kaneko Feb 2017 A1
20170032033 Neumeier et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170032034 Neumeier et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170134770 Neumeier et al. May 2017 A9
20170186042 Wong et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170311014 Fleischman Oct 2017 A1
20170353776 Holden et al. Dec 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
2 685 450 Jan 2014 AL
2501316 Sep 2005 CA
1557096 Dec 2004 CN
101162470 Apr 2008 CN
1681304 Jul 2010 CN
102377960 Mar 2012 CN
101681373 Sep 2012 CN
248 533 Aug 1994 EP
1578126 Sep 2005 EP
1 760 693 Mar 2007 EP
2 084 624 Aug 2009 EP
2 352 289 Aug 2011 EP
2 541 963 Jan 2013 EP
2457694 Aug 2009 GB
0144992 Jun 2001 WO
2005101998 Nov 2005 WO
2007114796 Oct 2007 WO
2008065340 Jun 2008 WO
2009131861 Oct 2009 WO
2009150425 Dec 2009 WO
2010135082 Nov 2010 WO
2011090540 Jul 2011 WO
2012057724 May 2012 WO
2012108975 Aug 2012 WO
2012170451 Dec 2012 WO
2014142758 Sep 2014 WO
2014145929 Sep 2014 WO
2015100372 Jul 2015 WO
2016123495 Aug 2016 WO
2016168556 Oct 2016 WO
2017011758 Jan 2017 WO
2017011792 Jan 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 31, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072255, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 26, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/015681,13 pages.
“How to: Watch from the beginning |About DISH” (Dec. 31, 2014) XP055265764, retrieved on Apr. 15, 2016 from URL:http://about.dish.com/blog/hopper/how-watch-beginning 2 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 24, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/027691, 13 pages.
Gionis et al., “Similarity Search in High Dimension via Hashing”, Proceedings of the 25th VLDB Conference, 1999, 12 pages.
Huang , “Bounded Coordinate System Indexing for Real-time Video Clip Search”, Retrieved from the Internet:URL:http://staff.itee.uq.edu.aujzxf/papers/TOIS.pdf, Jan. 1, 2009, 32 pages.
Kim et al., “Edge-Based Spatial Descriptor Using Color Vector Angle for Effective Image Retrieval”, Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence; [Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 365-375.
Liu et al., “Near-duplicate video retrieval”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 45, No. 4, Aug. 30, 2013, pp. 1-23.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 12, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/042522,13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 11, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/042621, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 20, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/042611,12 pages.
Scouarnec et al., “Cache policies for cloud-based systems:To keep or not to keep”, 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, IEEE XP032696624, Jun. 27, 2014, pp. 1-8.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 25, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/042564, 14 pages.
Anonymous; “Cache (computing)” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phpti tle=Cache(computing)&oldid=474222804, Jan. 31, 2012; 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/042557, 11 pages.
Anil K. Jain, “Image Coding via a Nearest Neighbors Image Model” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. Com-23, No. 3, Mar. 1975, pp. 318-331.
Lee et al., “Fast Video Search Algorithm for Large Video Database Using Adjacent Pixel Intensity Difference Quantization Histogram Feature” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2009, pp. 214-220.
Li et al., A Confidence Based Recognition System for TV Commercial Extraction, Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology vol. 75, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 27, 2011 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/057153, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2011 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/057155, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 26, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/030782; 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 21, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/030795; 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 25, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/030805, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 7, 2013 for European Application No. 12178359.1, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 11, 2013 for European Application No. 10844152.8, 19 pages.
Kabal (P.), Ramachandran (R.P.): The computation of line spectral frequencies using Chebyshev polynomials, IEEE Trans. on ASSP, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1419-1426, 1986.
Itakura (F.): Line spectral representation of linear predictive coefficients of speech signals, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 57, Supplement No. 1, S35, 1975, 3 pages.
Bistritz (Y.), Pellerm (S.): Immittance Spectral Pairs (ISP) for speech encoding, Proc. ICASSP'93, pp. 11-9 to 11-12.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 8, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/ US2015/062945; 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2016 for European Application No. 14763506.4, 11 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2016 for European Application No. 14764182.3, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 14762850.7, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 16, 2017, for European Patent Application No. 14873564.0, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/551,933 , “Final Office Action”, dated May 23, 2016, 19 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/551,933 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 17, 2016, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/551,933 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 31, 2015, 24 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/551,933 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Mar. 21, 2017, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,039 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated May 23, 2014, 27 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,039 , “Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 7, 2014, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,039 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/678,856 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 28 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/678,856 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated May 20, 2016, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,075, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 16, 2014, 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,075, “Notice of Allowance ”, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 51 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,094, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,375, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 1, 2015, 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,375, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Apr. 1, 2015, 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,425, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 7, 2015, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,425, “Notice of Allowance”, dated May 20, 2015, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,435, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 24, 2014, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,435, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,099 , “First Action Interview Office Action Summary”, dated May 9, 2017, 6 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,099 , “First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication”, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 5 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,721 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 28, 2012, 15 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,721 , “Final Office Action”, dated Aug. 15, 2012, 22 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,721 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Aug. 15, 2013, 16 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/763,158 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 16 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/763,158 , “ Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 7, 2016, 12 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/763,158 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Mar. 17, 2016, 8 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,849 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 25, 2015, 12 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,849 , “Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 19, 2016, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,849 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 10 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,003 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jul. 30, 2014, 24 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,748 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jan. 10, 2013, 10 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,748 , “Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 13 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,748 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 7 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/953,994 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 34 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/953,994 , “Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 36 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/953,994 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 15 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,849 , “Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 22, 2017, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,099 , “Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 24, 2017, 22 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,801 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Aug. 11, 2017, 18 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,815 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Aug. 23, 2017, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,345 , “First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication”, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,849 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 9 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,801 , “Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 24 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,099, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 23 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,815 , “Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 2, 2018, 14 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,345 , “Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 2, 2018, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2018 for European Application No. 15865033.3, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,842 , “Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 2, 2018, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/210,730, “Notice of Allowance”, dated May 23, 2018, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,692, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 6, 2018, 20 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,099, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,706, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 26, 2018, 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,801, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,345, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,842, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Sep. 7, 2018, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,815, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Sep. 12, 2018, 9 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180054658 A1 Feb 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61920086 Dec 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14763158 US
Child 15796698 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14551933 Nov 2014 US
Child 14763158 US