The following relates to the medical diagnosis and treatment arts. It finds particular application in monitoring the diagnosis, management, and treatment of cardiac diseases based on levels of natriuretic peptides, and will be described with particular reference thereto. However, it also finds application in monitoring of cardiac diseases based on levels of various other cardiac markers.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the diagnosis for cardiac diseases is based on the presence of at least 2 of the following criteria: An electrocardiogram (ECG), patient history and serum cardiac markers. The 4 classical serum markers are: Total-CK (Creatine Kinase), CK-MB (Creatine Kinase MB isoenzyme), Myoglobin and cardiac Troponins. In the last years the natriuretic peptides have gained more and more interest as serum cardiac markers. A significant advance in the diagnosis and monitoring of cardiac diseases has been the development of blood automated and semi-automated assay tests that measure the level of a cardiac marker in a blood sample drawn from a patient known or suspected to be suffering from a cardiac disease. Some cardiac markers of interest include: atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP); N-terminal proANP (NT-proANP); brain natriuretic peptide (BNP); N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP); C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP); and so forth. These various cardiac markers are secreted by the patients body during cardiac stress, and hence correlate with cardiac stress. During a heart attack, the level of cardiac markers typically increases sharply, and then decreases as the cardiac marker is utilized, metabolized or otherwise removed from the bloodstream. In the case of a congestive heart failure or other chronic cardiac stresses, a persistent level of such cardiac markers may be observed in the blood. Thus, the assayed level of cardiac marker is useful in detecting the presence of heart failure, determining its severity, and estimating prognosis. By monitoring cardiac marker levels in blood serum during treatment, the effectiveness of the treatment can be assessed.
Some of these cardiac markers have also been considered as possible therapeutic agents for treating cardiac diseases. Scios, Inc., for example, developed Natrecor® (nesiritide), a recombinant form of human B-type natriuretic peptide (hBNP), which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001 for the intravenous treatment of patients with certain types of acute heart failure. Synthetic therapeutic agents, such as nesiritide, which correspond to cardiac markers have shown substantial promise and demonstrated clinical success. In patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure, nesiritide reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance, all resulting in clinical improvement. Nesiritide has certain advantages over parental vasodilators (e.g. nitroprusside and nitroglycerin) and inotropic agents (e.g. dobutamine and milrinone) currently used in treating decompensated heart failure, being more effective and better tolerated, allowing patients to continue their usual medications while in the hospital, and not automatically requiring invasive monitoring. The terminal half-life of nesiritide in the bloodstream is 20 minutes, the onset of action is 15 min, and a fixed dose of nesiritide has a sustained effect over 24 hours.
However, a therapeutic agent which is a synthetic form of a cardiac marker or is otherwise mimetic of a cardiac marker typically interferes with the blood assay of the natural cardiac marker. For example, nesiritide is typically detected by the same blood assay techniques used to monitor the level of natural BNP. Accordingly, the BNP cardiac marker assay cannot separately monitor both the progression of heart failure (diagnostic aspect) and the efficiency of therapy using a synthetic form of the cardiac marker (kinetic aspect). It is desirable to monitoring both the kinetics of the administered therapeutic agent, and the progression of the underlying heart disease, in order to assess the effectiveness of the treatment.
According to one aspect, a cardiac monitoring method is disclosed. At least an inactive natriuretic peptide and an active natriuretic peptide are assayed in a biological sample taken from a patient. Both the inactive and active natriuretic peptides are produced in the patient responsive to cardiac stress. A therapeutic agent is administered to the patient. The administered therapeutic agent substantially interferes with the active natriuretic peptide assay but does not substantially interfere with the inactive natriuretic peptide assay. Kinetics of the administered therapeutic agent is determined based on at least the active natriuretic peptide assay. Cardiac diagnostic information is determined based on at least the inactive natriuretic peptide assay.
According to another aspect, a cardiac monitoring method is disclosed. A therapeutic agent is administered to a patient. A first cardiac marker assay is performed that is substantially affected by the therapeutic agent. A second cardiac marker assay is performed that is substantially not affected by the therapeutic agent. Kinetics of the administered therapeutic agent is determined based on at least the first cardiac marker assay. Cardiac diagnostic information is assessed based on at least the second cardiac marker assay.
According to another aspect a cardiac monitoring apparatus is disclosed. A blood extraction device is adapted to extract a plurality of blood samples from a patient undergoing treatment including administration of a synthetic or mimetic form of an active natriuretic peptide. An assay device is adapted to perform a blood assay yielding at least (i) an active natriuretic peptide level of a naturally produced natriuretic peptide and the synthetic or mimetic peptide and (ii) an inactive natriuretic peptide level for each blood sample. An interpretation device outputs at least one of (i) kinetics of the administered synthetic or mimetic natriuretic peptide based on at least the first cardiac marker assay, and (ii) cardiac diagnosis information based on at least the second cardiac marker assay.
One advantage resides in providing both kinetic and diagnostic information during treatment of a cardiac disease using a therapeutic agent that interferes with cardiac marker monitoring.
Another advantage resides in facilitating treatment of cardiac disease using nesiritide or other natriuretic peptide therapeutic agents.
Another advantage resides in extracting both uptake of a therapeutic agent and cardiac diagnostic information from a common blood assay.
Numerous additional advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various process operations and arrangements of process operations. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
With reference to
The level of active BNP 20 in the blood is denoted herein as [C]BNP. The level of inactive NT-proBNP 22 in the blood is denoted herein as [C]NT. The levels of BNP 20 and NT-proBNP 22 are typically related. It is believed that this relationship is due to the production of BNP 20 and NT-proBNP 22 from a common biochemical pathway such that they are produced in equimolar amounts; however, the relationship between the levels of BNP 20 and NT-proBNP 22 may be due to other factors such as secretion responsive to a common cardiac stressor.
Although the blood serum levels of BNP 20 and NT-proBNP 22 are typically related, the physiologically inactive NT-proBNP 22 is relatively more stable and stays resident longer in the blood compared with the physiologically active BNP 20. The terminal half-life of BNP 20 in the bloodstream is denoted herein as τBNP, and is believed to be typically of order of a few minutes to a few hours. In contrast, the terminal half-life of NT-proBNP 22 in the bloodstream, denoted herein as τNT, is typically substantially longer, and is believed to be about a month or longer.
The BNP 20 and NT-proBNP 22 cardiac markers are an example pair of related cardiac markers. It is expected that other pairs of cardiac markers may be similarly produced by related biochemical reactions or otherwise have related concentrations. Typically, if a common biochemical pathway or precursor molecule produces both an active natriuretic peptide or other cardiac marker and an inactive natriuretic peptide or other cardiac marker, then the terminal half-life of the inactive cardiac marker in the bloodstream will generally be substantially longer than the terminal half-life of the active cardiac marker in the bloodstream. It is expected that the inactive cardiac marker will typically have a terminal half-life at least ten times longer than the half-life of the active cardiac marker in the bloodstream, although the half-life difference may be less. For example, it is believed that ANP and NT-proANP are another related pair of active and inactive cardiac markers, respectively, derived from a common precursor molecule and hence generated in equimolar amounts. The terminal half-life of ANP in the bloodstream is believed to be substantially longer than the terminal half-life of NT-proANP in the bloodstream.
A physiologically active cardiac marker (BNP 20 in example
Nesiritide 26 is used as a treatment agent in the example of
Accordingly, a second blood serum assay 32 is performed to assay the level of NT-proBNP 22. The second assay 32 is not substantially affected by the administered nesiritide 26; accordingly, the second assay 32 can be used to determine cardiac diagnostic information. The first assay 30 can then be used to determine kinetics of the administered nesiritide 26.
With reference to
The first assay 30 outputs a level [C]BNP+nesiritide indicative of the combination of the level of nesiritide and the level of natural BNP. The second assay 32 outputs a level [C]NT indicative of only the level of NT-proBNP in the blood. The second assay is suitably used to determine cardiac diagnostic information, such as to estimate the severity of the cardiac event. The first assay 30 is suitably used to provide kinetics on the nesiritide treatment. For example, a difference or slope mkinetics between two repetitions of the first assay 30 can be used to determine uptake of the nesiritide into the patient's bloodstream. In the region “D”, the nesiritide dose has dissipated from the bloodstream, and the patient has returned to the persistent levels of BNP and NT-proBNP existing prior to the cardiac event. In the region “E”, a follow-up dose of nesiritide is administered.
With reference to
While the first assay 30 provides kinetic information about the administered treatment agent 26, the second assay 32 provides diagnostic information about the progression of the cardiac disease. A difference Δprog between the level assayed using the second assay 32 on successive treatment dates shows, in the example
With reference to
In
With reference to
In the illustrated cardiac monitoring apparatus 70, the interpretation device 80 includes a “Nesiritide Treatment Log” card or display, on which for each date two sequential blood sample assays are recorded for each nesiritide treatment date over a treatment period. The two blood samples can be drawn before and a predetermined time after the nesiritide is administered, or can be drawn at two different predetermined times after the nesiritide is administered. By reading down the “NT-proBNP” column for successive treatment dates, the progression of the underlying cardiac disease can be ascertained. For example, if the recorded [C]NT levels decrease over the course of the treatment period, this is an indication that the underlying cardiac disease is becoming less symptomatic. On the other hand, constant or increasing recorded [C]NT levels suggest that the nesiritide treatment is ineffective. To derive the kinetic information on nesiritide uptake, the difference between the first assay 30 levels for the two blood samples drawn on a given treatment date is recorded. This difference is indicative of the uptake of nesiritide into the bloodstream.
Rather than a paper “Nesiritide Treatment Log” card 80, an electronic log can be maintained. For example, the “Nesiritide Treatment Log” card 80 can be an electronic spreadsheet that includes a processor that automatically performs the difference computation to determine the nesiritide level. Moreover, such an electronic spreadsheet optionally includes a more complex kinetic information derivation, for example taking into account the NT-proBNP level [C]NT assayed using the second assay 32. Optionally, the processor analyzes the assay results over time to provide alarms or warnings, proposed diagnoses, proposed nesiritide dosage adjustments, or so forth.
Because the disclosed cardiac monitoring methods and apparatuses employ standard blood assay techniques, the disclosed cardiac monitoring apparatus can be embodied as a near-patient monitoring device in a hospital, for example in an emergency room. Similarly, the disclosed cardiac monitoring apparatus can be embodied as a test station or apparatus located in a physician's office or laboratory. It is also contemplated to employ the disclosed cardiac monitoring apparatus as an in-home testing device for self-testing performed by the patient. For example, the patient can have the vials 72 and blood-drawing device 74 at home, and can draw blood samples at appropriate times. The blood samples are then sent to a laboratory which has the assay device 76 and interpretation device 80. It is also contemplated to assay body fluids other than blood which may contain BNP, NT-proBNP, or other cardiac markers.
The illustrated methods and apparatuses using the combination of BNP and NT-proBNP assays to determine both kinetic and diagnostic information are examples. In other embodiments, for example, the first assay may monitor ANP, while the second assay may monitor NT-proANP. In other embodiments, the first assay may monitor CNP, while the second assay may monitor NT-proCNP. In other embodiments, the first assay may monitor DNP, while the second assay may monitor NT-proDNP. Still further, it is contemplated to monitor active and inactive cardiac markers derived from different biochemical pathways or precursor molecules. For example, monitoring of BNP and NT-proANP is contemplated. In this embodiment, BNP monitoring provides kinetic information on nesiritide uptake, while NT-proANP monitoring provides diagnostic information. Although BNP and NT-proANP are believed to be derived from separate biochemical pathways (and hence are not expected to be produced in equimolar amounts), both BNP and NT-proANP are believed to be produced in the patient predominantly due to cardiac stress; accordingly, monitoring both BNP and NT-proANP is expected to provide both kinetic and diagnostic information. Other assay combinations are also contemplated.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB06/52578 | 7/27/2006 | WO | 00 | 1/25/2008 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60703928 | Jul 2005 | US |