Monitoring performance and operation of data exchanges

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10462025
  • Patent Number
    10,462,025
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 15, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 29, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for monitoring the performance associated with fulfilling resource requests are provided. One or more client computing devices obtain an original resource request and associate a record identifier with the original resource request. The one or more client computing devices also determine performance data associated with processing each embedded resource request included in a response to the original resource request. Each embedded resource request is associated with a component record identifier that is associated with, but different from, the record identifier of the original resource request. The one or more client computing devices can then transmit the determined performance data with the record identifier to another processing device.
Description
BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via a communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a browser application to request a web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.


Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can require further consideration of latencies associated with delivery of the individual components as well as the originally requested content as a whole.


With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, that are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices, such as a browser application, typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resource reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced computing devices. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider(s) (or any service provider on behalf of the content provider(s)) would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page and/or data associated with the embedded resources.


Traditionally, a number of methodologies exist which measure the performance associated with the exchange of data such as in the environment described above. For example, some methodologies provide for limited measurement of performance metrics associated with network side processing of a content request. Other methodologies allow for limited measurement of performance metrics associated with a content request as measured from a browser application's perspective.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many of the attendant advantages and aspects of the present disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of a performance measurement system including a number of client computing devices, a content provider, and a processing device;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the performance measurement system of FIG. 1 illustrating the process of monitoring and fulfilling content requests;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the performance measurement system of FIG. 1 illustrating the process of identifying and providing performance metric information from a client computing device;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the performance measurement system of FIG. 1 illustrating the process of identifying and providing performance metric information from a content provider;



FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrative of a performance monitoring routine implemented by a client computing device for monitoring the performance associated with resource requests made by the client computing device;



FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrative of a performance monitoring routine implemented by a performance measurement component for further monitoring client side performance associated with resource requests made by the client computing device; and



FIG. 7 is an illustrative user interface displaying a variety of performance metric information collected by the performance measurement system of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to monitoring the performance and processing of data exchanges between client computing devices and server computing devices. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to monitoring a data exchange involving a request by a client computing device for an original resource including one or more embedded resources. Performance data can then be used to assess performance related to the processing of the client request for the original resource and any embedded resources. Additionally, the processed performance data can be used to support modifications to the original resource and/or embedded resources to improve performance for subsequent client requests for the original resource and/or embedded resources.


Traditionally, network servers can collect latency information associated with a server's processing of a client request for a resource. For example, network servers can measure a time associated with processing an incoming client request, identifying/obtaining the requested resource, and initiating the transmission of the resource responsive to the client request. Additionally, client computing devices can collect latency information associated with the client computing device's initiation of a resource request and receipt of the resource responsive to the request. Aspects of the present disclosure, which will be described further below, are directed to identifying and providing additional information to improve the performance assessment related to the processing of a client request for an original resource and any embedded resources. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of a performance measurement system 100 for monitoring the performance and processing of data exchanges. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the performance measurement system 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102 (generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a content provider. As illustrated in FIG. 1, each client computing device 102 includes a client computing component 104 for requesting content from network resources in the form of an originally requested resource that may include identifiers to one or more embedded resources that need to be requested. As will be described in greater detail below, the client computing component 104 also identifies performance metrics obtained by client computing devices and/or components, such as browser software applications. Additionally, the client computing device 102 includes a performance measurement component 106 that identifies additional performance metrics associated with the client request, such as network level performance data including, for example, timing of receipt of first and last network packets of data for fulfilling the original resource request and each embedded resource request. In one embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 works in conjunction with the client computing component 104 to collect performance metric information such as from an operating system or a data file.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the client computing component 104 and performance measurement component 106 are executed on each client computing device 102. Alternatively, the client computing component 104 may not be configured, or is otherwise incapable of, obtaining or providing some or all of the performance metric information described herein. In such an embodiment, the client computing component 104 may function with a reduced or limited capacity. In still a further embodiment, the client computing component 104 may function in conjunction with a separate communication software application (e.g., a browser software application) to provide the combined functionality described for the client computing component 104. For example, the client computing component could correspond to a stand alone software application, plugin, script, and the like. Additionally, although each client computing device 102 is illustrated as having a separate performance measurement component 106, in an alternative embodiment, the performance measure component 106 may be shared by one or more client computing devices.


In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. As also illustrated in FIG. 1, the client computing devices 102 are considered to be logically grouped, as represented generally by client 107, regardless of whether the client computing devices are physically separate and geographically distributed throughout the communication network 114. In this regard, the client computing devices 102 can each communicate directly or indirectly with other computing devices over network 114, such as a wide area network or local network. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that client 107 can include or otherwise be associated with various additional computing devices/components including, but not limited to, content and resource administrative components, DNS resolvers, scheduling devices/components, and the like.


Each of the client computing devices 102 can accordingly include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over the network 114. For example, the client computing devices 102 may include networking components and additional software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet. As previously described, the client computing device 102 may include an additional, separate browser software application. The client computing devices 102 can also be associated with, or otherwise include, other computing components, such as proxy applications, for further facilitating communications via the Internet or an intranet. As previously described, the client computing components 104 can each function as a browser software application for requesting content from a network resource. Additionally, in an illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can function as a proxy application for managing browser application content requests to the network resource. In other embodiments, the client computing devices 102 may be otherwise associated with an external proxy application, as well as any other additional software applications or software services, used in conjunction with requests for content.


With continued reference to FIG. 1 and as set forth generally above, the performance measurement system 100 can include a content provider 108 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 114. The content provider 108 can include a number of content delivery components 110, such as a Web server component and associated storage component corresponding to one or more server computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider 108 can further include a performance measurement component 112 for measuring performance metrics, such as a time associated with processing an incoming client request, identifying/obtaining the requested resource, and initiating the transmission of the resource responsive to the client request. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 108 can include or otherwise be associated with various additional computing resources including, but not limited to, additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, DNS name servers, interfaces for obtaining externally provided content (e.g., advertisements, web services, etc.), and the like. Although the performance measurement system 100 is illustrated in a client-server configuration, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the performance measurement system 100 may be implanted in a peer-to-peer configuration as well.


With yet further continued reference to FIG. 1, the performance measurement system 103 can further include a processing device 116 for collecting and aggregating performance data related to the processing of client requests. The processing device 116 can also be used to assess the collected performance data and to determine if modifications to the original resource and/or embedded resources should be made to improve performance for subsequent client requests for the original resource and/or embedded resources.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the processing device 116 is in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 and the content provider 108 via communication network 114. Additionally, as will be further described below, the processing device 116 can include a metric processing component 118 for the collection and aggregation of performance data from the client computing devices 102 and content provider 108, as well as for the assessment of performance data. Specifically, in one embodiment, the client computing components 104 and performance measurement components 106 associated with client computing devices 102 provide performance metric information to the metric processing component 118, while the performance measurement component 112 of the content provider 108 provides performance metric information to the metric processing component 118. The processing device 116 can further include a local data store 120 for storing the received performance data. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art and others that metric processing component 118 and data store 120 may correspond to multiple devices/components and/or may be distributed.


One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in FIG. 1 are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, additional or alternative components and/or configurations, especially regarding additional components, systems and subsystems for facilitating communications may be utilized.


With reference now to FIGS. 2-4, an illustrative example of the operation of the performance measurement system 100 according to some embodiments will be described. For purposes of the example, however, the illustration has been simplified such that many of the components utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


With reference to FIG. 2, a client computing component 104 initiates a content request that is intended to ultimately be received and processed by the content provider 108. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of a base set of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The base set of information can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers that corresponds to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The embedded resource identifiers can be generally referred to as resource identifiers or resource URLs. The request for the base set of information and the subsequent request(s) for any embedded resources can be referred to generally as a “resource request.”


In one embodiment, prior to initiating a resource request, the client computing component 104 associates a record identifier with the resource request. As will be described further below, the record identifier can be used to track performance metrics associated with processing the requested resource and any embedded resources. In one example, the record identifier may be attached to the resource request as a header or otherwise embedded in the request. The client computing component 104 then transmits the resource request with the record identifier. However, as will also be described further below, the client computing component 104 can alternatively transmit the associated record identifier in a separate transmission from the resource request.


It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art and others that the client computing component 104 can generate the resource request and associated record identifier itself or receive one or the other or both from another storage or computing device. For example, another computing device, such as processing device 116, can be used to determine whether a test to monitor performance metrics associated with processing a particular resource, such as a Web page, should be conducted. In this example, the processing device 116 can send the test request, which includes a resource identifier corresponding to the desired resource request and a record identifier further associated with the resource identifier, to the client computing device 102.


In one illustrative embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, the client computing component 104 initiates the content request by transmitting the resource identifier and associated record identifier directly or indirectly to the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. However, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that, in the alternative, the performance measurement component 106 can otherwise intercept the content request initiated by the client computing component 104.


Continuing with the present example and in further reference to FIG. 2, the performance measurement component 106 receives the resource request and forwards the resource request on to the content provider 108 via communication network 114. Thereafter, the performance measurement component 106 continually monitors performance metrics associated with the processing of the requested resource, including any embedded resources. Specifically, in one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 monitors network level performance metrics associated with the processing of the requested resource and any embedded resources, such as timing of receipt of the first and last bytes (or packets) of data of each request. The performance measurement component 106 can either obtain such performance metric information directly from the operating system of the client computing device 102 or through the client computing component 104. The performance measurement component 106 associates the monitored performance metrics with the record identifier.


As further illustrated in FIG. 2, the content provider 108 receives the resource request from the client computing device 102 and processes the resource request using content delivery components 110, such as a Web server. The content provider 108 can also use a performance measurement component 112 to monitor performance metrics associated with processing the incoming client request, identifying/obtaining the requested resource, and initiating the transmission of the resource responsive to the client request. As shown in FIG. 2, upon obtaining the requested resource, the content provider 108 initiates transmission of the requested resource to the client computing device 102.


In this illustrative example, the performance measurement component 106 at the client computing device 102 obtains the requested resource, continues monitoring the processing of the requested resource, and forwards the requested resource to the client computing component 104. For example, the performance measurement component 106 may serve as a proxy application for receiving the requested resource or otherwise intercepting the requested resource. The client computing component 104 also tracks performance metrics associated with the processing of the requested resource. Upon receipt of the requested resource, the client computing component 104 begins processing the content for display, execution, or storage on a resource associated with the client computing device 102. This processing may include all or some of, for example, rendering into a framebuffer or other memory, displaying on a local or remote display device, execution on a virtual machine, and so forth. As will be further described below, the above described functions apply to the processing of the originally requested resource, as well as any embedded resources.


With reference now to FIG. 3, the client computing component 104 and the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can each identify performance metric information that the respective components have monitored and/or collected. The performance metric information from the client computing component 104 can include a variety of information, such as process information, memory information, network data, resource data, client computing component information, including page setups, browser rendering information, state variables, and other types of information. In one specific example, the performance metric information can include information regarding a time at which a particular resource was rendered on a Web page, its location on the page, whether the resource was rendered on the device display, and the like. The performance metric information from the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can also include a variety of information. In one specific example, the performance metric data can include network statistics, latencies, bandwidths, and data arrival times, such as the timing of receipt of first and last packets of information for the requested resource and each embedded resource. In another specific example, the performance metric information can include timing information associated with processing executable resources, such as JavaScript, as well as additional information that can be used to indirectly determine processing times associated with the execution of the resource once the executable code has been obtained.


The performance metric information from the client computing component 104 and/or the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can also include basic resource information, such as an identification of the resource type, a link to a header associated with the requested resource, a size of the resource, and the like. Even further, the performance metric information can include underlying computer resource information, such as a resolution of the display of the client computing device 102, a version of the browser application software, an identification of any plugins associated with the browser application software, an identification of any updates to the operating system of the client computing device 102, and the like.


With continued reference to FIG. 3, the client computing component 104 and the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 100 provide the identified performance metric information together with the associated record identifier of the requested resource to the metric processing component 118 of the processing device 116 via the communication network 114. The metric processing component 118 then processes the received performance metric information to assess performance related to the processing of the client request for the original resource and any embedded resources. The processed performance metric information can be used to support modifications to the original resource and/or embedded resources to improve performance for subsequent client requests for the original resource. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art and others, the processing device 116 can store the received and/or processed performance metric information in local data store 120, or any other data store distributed across the network 114. Additionally, as will be further described below in reference to FIG. 7, the processing device 116 can cause the display of the processed performance metric information to a user of the system for further assessment.


In one illustrative embodiment, once the client computing component 104 completes processing of the requested resource and any embedded resources, the client computing component 104 identifies performance metric information that the client computing component 104 monitored and/or otherwise collected related to such processing. In this example, the client computing component 104 provides the identified performance metric information with the record identifier associated with the requested resource to the metric processing component 118. Upon receipt of this information, the metric processing component 118 then requests any further performance metric information related to the requested resource and any embedded resources from the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. In response, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 identifies and provides performance metric information with the record identifier associated with the requested resource to the metric processing component 118. The metric processing component 118 can use the record identifier to aggregate the received performance metric information. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art and others that the identified performance metric information can be transmitted to the metric processing component 118 by a number of alternative methodologies and/or components.


With reference now to FIG. 4, in one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 112 of the content provider 108 can identify performance metric information that it has collected related to the processing of the requested resource and/or any embedded resource. The performance measurement component 112 provides the identified performance metric information to the metric processing component 118 of the processing device 116 via communication network 114. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art and others, the performance measurement component 112 of the content provider 108 can provide the performance metric information upon request from the processing device 116 or upon completing its processing of the requested resource. As will be described further below, the processing device 116 can then aggregate the performance metric information from all components for displaying, processing, storing, or otherwise assessing performance related to the processing of the requested resource.


With reference now to FIG. 5, one embodiment of a performance monitoring routine 500 implemented by the client computing component 104 of the client computing device 102 will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 500 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the client computing device 102. Accordingly, routine 500 has been logically associated as being generally performed by the client computing device 102, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be construed as limiting.


At block 502, a client computing component 104 identifies an original resource request. As previously mentioned, the client computing component 104 can generate the original resource request or receive the original resource request from another computing device, such as processing device 116. In one example, the original resource request can be for a Web page, such as http://example.com. At block 504, the client computing component 104 associates a record identifier (RID) with the original resource request. The RID may be a unique identifier associated with the original resource request. As will be further described below, the RID can also be associated with any embedded resources included in a response to the original resource request. Even further, although not illustrated, in an alternative embodiment, in the event that the client computing component 104 does not need a RID, the client computing component 104 may not associate a RID with the resource request at shown at block 504.


At block 506, the resource request is transmitted to another entity. In this example, the resource request is transmitted to the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. As previously mentioned, the performance measurement component 106 can alternatively intercept the transmission request as it is being routed to a content provider 108 for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the resource request may itself contain the RID, such that the resource request and associated RID are transmitted as part of the same transmission. For example, the RID can be included as a portion of the resource URL used to request the resource. Alternatively or additionally, the RID may be transmitted in a second communication, either before or after the transmission including the resource request. For example, a “start new request group” command, including the RID may be issued before or after the initial resource request. In one further alternative embodiment, the client computing component 104 may not include a RID with the issuance of a “start new request group” command, and in this case, the performance measurement component 106 may generate, or otherwise obtain, such a RID upon receipt of the “start new request group” command.


Continuing at block 508, a determination is made at the client computing component 104 regarding whether any additional resources need to be requested to fulfill the original resource request. As appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art, a response to the original resource request can be returned to the client computing component 104 which includes a number of resource URLs corresponding to a number of embedded resources required to fulfill the original resource request. In one embodiment, if such additional resources are identified, processing returns to block 506 where the client computing component 104 transmits one or more requests for the identified embedded resources with the RID associated with the original resource request.


Alternatively or additionally, the client computing component 104 can assign a component record identifier (CRID) to each request for an embedded resource at optional block 510. In this example, when processing returns to block 506, the client computing component 104 can transmit the one or more embedded resource requests with the respectively assigned CRIDs. In an illustrative embodiment, the requests for embedded resources can be transmitted with respective CRIDs alone or together with the RID of the original resource request. As embedded resource requests (or component requests) are fulfilled, the returned content is processed by the client computing component 101. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that a response to an embedded resource request can include links to further embedded resources. As such, the functionality associated with blocks 506-510 may be repeated as described above until no resource requests are outstanding and no more additional resources need to be requested.


It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that resource requests are processed by the client computing device 100 in accordance with logic associated with the particular configuration of the browser software application. For example, the browser software application may be limited by a number of resource requests that can be made at one time, an order associated with the type of requests that can be made, an order based on a predetermined location for the requested resources on a display screen, or other limitations provided in the requested base resource.


Once the client computing component 104 determines at block 508 that no additional resources need to be obtained to fulfill the original resource request or any subsequent embedded resource request, processing can continue at optional block 512. At block 512, a termination command, such as “end new request group”, may be transmitted to indicate that the request, including requests for all embedded resources, has completed. Such a termination command may provide closure to a “start new request group” command, if one were issued as part of the first iteration of block 506. In this example, the start/termination commands can be received and used by the performance measurement component 106 to determine which requested resources are associated with a particular originally requested resource.


At block 514, once the client computing component 104 has completed processing the requested original resource and any embedded resources, the client computing component 104 provides monitored performance metric information to processing device 116. The client computing component 104 monitors such performance metric information throughout the processing of the original resource request from initiation of the original resource request to final rendering of the requested resource and any embedded resources. The performance metric information can include, for example, timing data associated with the initiation of each request, receipt of a response to each request, and rendering of each requested resource, as well as other information as described herein. The routine 500 ends at block 516.


With reference now to FIG. 6, one embodiment of a performance monitoring routine 600 implemented by the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 600 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the client computing device 102. Accordingly, routine 600 has been logically associated as being generally performed by the client computing device 102, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be construed as limiting.


At block 602, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing component 102 receives (or intercepts) an original resource request from the client computing component 104. In one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 receives the RID with the original resource request. Alternatively, the RID can be provided as a part of a separate transmission, and accordingly, in this case, the performance measurement component 106 receives the RID separately. At block 604, the performance measurement component 106 associates the RID with the original resource request. In accordance with other embodiments discussed above, the original resource request may be preceded or followed by a command or instructions, such as a “start new request group” command. Such commands may be transmitted with or without a RID, as set forth above. If such commands are received at the performance measurement component 106 without a RID, the performance measurement component can generate, or otherwise obtain, a RID to associate the original resource request at block 604.


Continuing at block 606, the original resource may be requested, such as by proxying or forwarding the resource request to the content provider 108 via network 114. The resource request may be modified from its original form before sending, such as by stripping headers including the associated RID. The performance measurement component 106 also monitors the processing, including fulfillment, of the resource request at block 606. For example, the performance measurement component can identify performance metric information related to the initiation of the resource request, the receipt of first and last bytes of data for each requested resource and any embedded resources, the receipt of responsive content, and the like. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art, once a response to the resource request is received at the performance measurement component 106, the response is returned to the requesting application.


At block 608, a determination is made by the performance measurement component 106 regarding whether a subsequent resource request related to the original resource request has been made by the client computing component 104 and accordingly received (or intercepted) by the performance measurement component. If a subsequent embedded resource request (which may bear the same RID as the original resource request, an appropriate CRID, and/or be within a start/stop command window) is received, processing continues at block 610. At block 610, the performance measurement component 106 requests any embedded resources and monitors the processing of the requested embedded resources as similarly described above in reference to the originally requested resource and block 606. The functionality associated with blocks 608-610 may be repeated as described above until no resource requests are outstanding.


If the performance measurement component 106 determines that no more outstanding resource requests remain at block 608, processing continues at block 612. Specifically, the performance measurement component 106 provides monitored performance metric information to processing device 116. The performance measurement component 102 monitors such performance metric information throughout the processing of the original resource request, from initiation of the original resource request to final rendering of the requested resource and any embedded resources. The performance metric information can include, for example, timing data associated with the initiation of each request, receipt of a response to each request, and receipt of first and last packets of data for each of the original resource request and any embedded resource requests, as well as other additional information as described herein.


In one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 can identify performance metric information for providing to the processing device 116 in a variety of ways. For example, in one embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 can store performance measurement information in a log file together with identifiers to associate performance metric information with corresponding resource requests. In this example a set of requested resources may be joined by common RIDs, common CRIDs, associated CRID (e.g., where each component has a distinct CRID, but the distinct CRIDs of a single group have been associated or otherwise linked together, such as by a RID). In another illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component can retrieve performance metric information from a log file based on timing information associated with a resource request. For example, a set of requested resources may be defined as the resources requested or fulfilled between a start command and an end command, or between an original resource request (inclusive) and a stop command. The routine 600 ends at block 614.


With reference now to FIG. 7, an illustrative user interface 700 generated by the processing device 116 for displaying a variety of performance metric information collected, or otherwise identified, by the performance measurement system of FIG. 1 will be described. Generally, the user interface 700 shown in FIG. 7 provides a graphical side-by-side comparison of the performance metric information identified for the originally requested resource and some or all requested embedded resources. The user interface 700 may also be provided over the network 114 for display on other computing devices.


With reference to FIG. 7, the user interface 700 may be utilized to display a set of time-based events for a set of resources. For example, the user interface 700 may graphically represent an order of time-based events for an originally requested resource and for each subsequent request for embedded resources. More specifically, the user interface 700 includes a legend 710 identifying, for a number of resource types, a graphical indicator corresponding to a number of time-based events 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720 involved in processing a request for the resource. The resource types identified in the legend 710 include HTML resources, image (IMG) resources, and JavaScript (JS) resources. However, it will be appreciated that a number of alternative or additional resource types can be identified. For each resource type, the legend 710 provides a distinct indicator corresponding to a transition period and/or transition event(s) occurring between each identified event 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720. In one embodiment, the distinct indicators may be visual in nature, such as color-coded, cross-hatched, or the like. In another embodiment, instead of using a distinct indicator for each transition period and/or transition event(s) associated with each resource type as illustrated in FIG. 7, a distinct indicator may be used simply for each transition period and/or transition event(s) regardless of the resource type.


In an illustrative embodiment, events 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720 correspond to the following time-based events identified by the performance metric information. Event 712 identifies a Start Event representing a time at which the corresponding resource was known to be required by the client computing component 104. Event 714 identifies a NetStart Event representing a time at which the corresponding resource was actually requested by the client computing component 104. The timing of the NetStart Event may not be the same as the Start Event if, for example, the browser software application limits the number of concurrent connections with a particular domain. Event 716 identifies a First Byte Event representing a time at which the first byte (or first packet) of the requested resource is received by the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. Event 718 identifies a Last Byte Event representing a time at which the last byte (or last packet) of the requested resource is received by the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. Finally, event 720 identifies a Render Event representing a time at which the client computing component 104 finishes rendering the requested resource.


A second portion 730 of the user interface 700 corresponds to a representation illustrating the occurrence of each of the time-based events 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720 for all or some of the resources requested in resolving the original resource request. In one embodiment, the representation horizontally corresponds to time and vertically corresponds to an ordered listing of the requested resources. In one example, the order can specifically correspond to an order in which the requested resources are initially identified by the client computing component 104. In addition, the second portion 730 of the display includes a variety of additional information adjacent to the time-based event representation for each resource. For example, in a first column 732, a resource type for each resource may be provided, e.g., HTML, image, CSS, JavaScript, and the like. In a second column 734, a link to a header corresponding to each requested resource may be provided. In a third column 736, an HTTP response status code corresponding to each requested resource can be provided. Code 200, for example, is indicative of a standard response for successful HTTP requests. Finally, in a fourth column 738, the size of each resource can be provided.


In another embodiment, yet further additional information may be displayed in the user interface 700. For example, the user interface 700 may display the total processing time, both numerically and graphically, associated with processing the original resource request including any embedded resource requests. In this example, an indicator 740 may illustrate a starting time while an indicator 746 may illustrate an ending time, both associated with the processing of the original resource request as a whole. Additionally, when the original resource request is a request for a Web page, the user interface 700 may illustrate a time, both numerically and graphically, at which all resources have been rendered in a portion of a Web page which is initially visible to a user without scrolling. This portion of the Web page is often referred as an “above the fold,” “above the scroll,” or “above the crease” portion. An indicator 744 in the user interface 700 of FIG. 7 illustrates an “above the fold” (ATF) event.


The foregoing performance metric information provided in the user interface 700 may be identified and/or collected by a combination of the client computing component 104 and/or the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that additional performance metric information can be displayed. Such additionally displayed performance metric information can be obtained by the client computing device 102, by the performance measurement component 112 of the content provider 108, or based on further processing of any of the identified and/or collected performance metric information. It will also be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that each resource and/or each type of resource may be associated with all or only a portion of the above-described events and/or performance metric information. In addition, other events and/or indicators associated with the other events may be used and illustrated in the user interface 700.


In one specific example, an executable resource, such as a JavaScript resource, is not rendered and, accordingly, neither a Render Event 720 nor an associated indicator illustrating the transition between a Last Byte Event 718 and a Render Event 720 will be illustrated in the user interface 700 for that executable resource. However, the processing device 116 can indirectly determine and display a processing time associated with execution of the code once the code itself is obtained (i.e., receipt of the last byte of the code which corresponds to the Last Byte Event 718). Such processing time is inferred in the user interface 700 of FIG. 7 by illustration of a gap formed between the receipt of the last byte of code associated with a first JavaScript resource at 750 and the start event associated with a subsequently requested JavaScript resource at 752. Alternatively, an additional event and/or associated indicator could be used to specifically identify the processing time associated with execution of the code.


By providing and displaying the foregoing performance metric information as set forth above, a user of the processing device 116 can readily evaluate the performance associated with processing the originally requested resource, including any embedded resources. In particular, the user interface 700 can help a user identify any problems associated with the processing of the originally requested resource, as well as determine one or more solutions to the identified problem. Solutions for improving performance may include, for example, making changes to the content itself, to the organization of content within the originally requested resource, to the client computing component, and the like.


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that while processing and monitoring functions have been described herein as being performed at various components of the client computing device, these functions can be distributed across one or more computing devices. In addition, the performance metric information monitored at the client computing device can be maintained globally by the client computing device and shared with all or some subset of the components of the client computing device.


It will further be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.


Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.


Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.


It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: as implemented by a client computing device configured with specific executable instructions, receiving, by the client computing device from a different processing device, an instruction for the client computing device to request an original resource;generating, by the client computing device, an original resource request for the original resource;associating, by the client computing device, a record identifier with an original resource request from the client computing device, wherein the original resource request includes an original resource identifier corresponding to an original resource;determining, by the client computing device, performance data associated with processing individual embedded resource requests corresponding to embedded resources included in a response to the original resource request, wherein the performance data includes, for individual embedded resource requests, timing of receipt of a first byte of data at the client computing device for the respective individual embedded resource; andtransmitting by the client computing device, to the different processing device, the determined performance data with the record identifier.
  • 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to timing of receipt of a last byte of data for the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a render event representing a time the client computing device completes rendering the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the timing of receipt of a last byte of data and the render event corresponding to respective individual embedded resource requests are different.
  • 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a start time event representing a time the client computing device is aware of the need to initiate the respective individual embedded resource request.
  • 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a netstart time event representing a time the client computing device requested the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the start time event and the netstart time event corresponding to respective individual embedded resource requests are different.
  • 8. A computer-implemented method comprising: as implemented by a client computing device configured with specific executable instructions, receiving, by the client computing device from a different processing device, an instruction for the client computing device to request an original resource;generating, by the client computing device, an original resource request for the original resource;associating, by the client computing device, a record identifier with the original resource request from the client computing device, wherein the original resource request includes an original resource identifier corresponding to the original resource;determining, by the client computing device, performance data associated with processing individual embedded resource requests corresponding to embedded resources included in a response to the original resource request, wherein the performance data includes, for individual embedded resource requests, a start time event representing a time the client computing device is aware of the need to initiate the respective individual embedded resource request; andtransmitting by the client computing device, to the different processing device, the determined performance data with the record identifier.
  • 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the performance data includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a netstart time event representing a time the client computing device requested the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a render event representing a time the client computing device completes rendering the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein associating a record identifier with the original resource request comprises generating a record identifier for the original resource request.
  • 12. A system comprising: one or more client computing devices including at least one hardware component, the one or more client computing devices operative to: receive, from a different processing device, an instruction for the client computing device to request an original resource;generate an original resource request for the original resource;associate a record identifier with an original resource request from the one or more client computing devices, wherein the original resource request includes an original resource identifier corresponding to an original resource;determine performance data associated with processing individual embedded resource requests corresponding to embedded resources included in a response to the original resource request, wherein the performance data includes, for individual embedded resource requests, timing of receipt of a first byte of data at the client computing device for the respective individual embedded resource; andtransmit, to the different processing device, the determined performance data with the record identifier.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to timing of receipt of a last byte of data for the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a render event representing a time the client computing device completes rendering the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the timing of receipt of a last byte of data and the render event corresponding to respective individual embedded resource requests are different.
  • 16. The system of claim 12, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a start time event representing a time the client computing device is aware of the need to initiate the respective individual embedded resource request.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the performance data further includes, for individual embedded resource requests, information corresponding to a netstart time event representing a time the client computing device requested the respective individual embedded resource.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the start time event and the netstart time event corresponding to respective individual embedded resource requests are different.
  • 19. The system of claim 12, wherein the one or more client computing devices include memory for storing the performance data.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/372,708, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,489,737, entitled “MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION OF DATA EXCHANGES” and filed on Feb. 14, 2012, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/240,583, entitled “MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION OF DATA EXCHANGES” and filed on Sep. 29, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (355)
Number Name Date Kind
5649185 Antognini et al. Jul 1997 A
5664106 Caccavale Sep 1997 A
5819033 Caccavale Oct 1998 A
5832517 Knutsen, II Nov 1998 A
5999636 Juang Dec 1999 A
6173322 Hu Jan 2001 B1
6182125 Borella et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185598 Farber et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6243761 Mogul et al. Jun 2001 B1
6377257 Borrel et al. Apr 2002 B1
6438592 Killian Aug 2002 B1
6473804 Kaiser et al. Oct 2002 B1
6529910 Fleskes Mar 2003 B1
6553419 Ram Apr 2003 B1
6560610 Eatherton et al. May 2003 B1
6611873 Kanehara Aug 2003 B1
6633324 Stephens, Jr. Oct 2003 B2
6662233 Skarpness et al. Dec 2003 B1
6697805 Choquier et al. Feb 2004 B1
6698013 Bertero et al. Feb 2004 B1
6714975 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2004 B1
6820133 Grove et al. Nov 2004 B1
6920498 Gourley et al. Jul 2005 B1
6978418 Bain et al. Dec 2005 B1
7009943 O'Neil Mar 2006 B2
7023465 Stephens, Jr. Apr 2006 B2
7065496 Subbloie et al. Jun 2006 B2
7085825 Pishevar et al. Aug 2006 B1
7096193 Beaudoin et al. Aug 2006 B1
7107273 Ohata et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114160 Suryanarayana et al. Sep 2006 B2
7120871 Harrington Oct 2006 B1
7120874 Shah et al. Oct 2006 B2
7146560 Dang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7185084 Sirivara et al. Feb 2007 B2
7269657 Alexander et al. Sep 2007 B1
7316648 Kelly et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320131 O'Toole, Jr. Jan 2008 B1
7343399 Hayball et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346676 Swildens et al. Mar 2008 B1
7373599 McElfresh et al. May 2008 B2
7502836 Menditto et al. Mar 2009 B1
7523181 Swildens et al. Apr 2009 B2
7555542 Ayers et al. Jun 2009 B1
7581224 Romero Aug 2009 B2
7596150 Baird et al. Sep 2009 B2
7623460 Miyazaki Nov 2009 B2
7624169 Lisiecki et al. Nov 2009 B2
7650376 Blumenau Jan 2010 B1
7653725 Yahiro et al. Jan 2010 B2
7676570 Levy et al. Mar 2010 B2
7685270 Vermeulen et al. Mar 2010 B1
7685273 Anastas et al. Mar 2010 B1
7698418 Shimada et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707071 Rigole Apr 2010 B2
7707173 Nanavati et al. Apr 2010 B2
7725658 Lang et al. May 2010 B2
7739400 Lindbo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7748005 Romero et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752301 Maiocco et al. Jul 2010 B1
7756032 Feick et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765295 Anastas et al. Jul 2010 B2
7773596 Marques Aug 2010 B1
7787380 Aggarwal et al. Aug 2010 B1
7860735 Evanitsky Dec 2010 B2
7865594 Baumback et al. Jan 2011 B1
7873065 Mukerji et al. Jan 2011 B1
7904875 Hegyi Mar 2011 B2
7925782 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930393 Baumback et al. Apr 2011 B1
7933988 Nasuto et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937456 McGrath May 2011 B2
7937477 Day et al. May 2011 B1
7949779 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7961736 Ayyagari Jun 2011 B2
7962597 Richardson et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979509 Malmskog et al. Jul 2011 B1
8028090 Richardson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8051166 Baumback et al. Nov 2011 B1
8069231 Schran et al. Nov 2011 B2
8082348 Averbuj et al. Dec 2011 B1
8117306 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122124 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8165915 Lucash Apr 2012 B1
8286176 Baumback et al. Oct 2012 B1
8296429 Baumback et al. Oct 2012 B2
8316124 Baumback et al. Nov 2012 B1
8321568 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2012 B2
8452870 Baumback et al. May 2013 B2
8463877 Richardson Jun 2013 B1
8468245 Farber et al. Jun 2013 B2
8489737 Baumback et al. Jul 2013 B2
8667127 Bettis et al. Mar 2014 B2
8762526 Baumback et al. Jun 2014 B2
8843625 Baumback et al. Sep 2014 B2
9071502 Baumback et al. Jun 2015 B2
9088460 Baumback et al. Jul 2015 B2
9118543 Baumback et al. Aug 2015 B2
9160641 Baumback et al. Oct 2015 B2
9210099 Baumback et al. Dec 2015 B2
9367929 Bettis et al. Jun 2016 B2
9491073 Baumback et al. Nov 2016 B2
9628403 Baumback et al. Apr 2017 B2
9660890 Baumback et al. May 2017 B2
9769248 Krishnan et al. Sep 2017 B1
9794188 Baumback et al. Oct 2017 B2
9825831 Baumback et al. Nov 2017 B2
10027739 Krishnan et al. Jul 2018 B1
10104009 Baumback et al. Oct 2018 B2
20010034771 Hutsch et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020016802 Hodgkinson Feb 2002 A1
20020062372 Hong et al. May 2002 A1
20020069420 Russell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073235 Chen et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083118 Sim Jun 2002 A1
20020099829 Richards et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099850 Farber et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107913 Rivera et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107944 Bai et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112049 Elnozahy et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116481 Lee Aug 2002 A1
20020116491 Boyd Aug 2002 A1
20020120666 Landsman et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020124098 Shaw Sep 2002 A1
20020135611 Deosaran et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138437 Lewin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138443 Schran et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143989 Huitema et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150094 Cheng et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150276 Chang Oct 2002 A1
20020156884 Bertram et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161767 Shapiro et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161911 Pinckney, III et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163882 Bornstein et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165912 Wenocur et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194382 Kausik et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198963 Wu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005111 Allan Jan 2003 A1
20030009488 Hart, III Jan 2003 A1
20030033283 Evans et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037108 Peiffer et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065784 Herrod Apr 2003 A1
20030118249 Edgar Jun 2003 A1
20030120741 Wu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128233 Kasriel Jul 2003 A1
20030130982 Kasriel Jul 2003 A1
20030131106 Kasriel Jul 2003 A1
20030149581 Chaudhri et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030172291 Judge et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174648 Wang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182305 Balva et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182413 Allen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030200394 Ashmore et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204602 Hudson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217144 Fu Nov 2003 A1
20030221000 Cherkasova Nov 2003 A1
20030229682 Day Dec 2003 A1
20030233423 Dilley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236836 Borthwick Dec 2003 A1
20040010621 Afergan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039794 Biby et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039820 Colby et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049541 Swahn Mar 2004 A1
20040049579 Ims et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059796 McLintock Mar 2004 A1
20040064293 Hamilton et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064558 Miyake Apr 2004 A1
20040073596 Kloninger et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083307 Uysal Apr 2004 A1
20040128538 Gmuender et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167981 Douglas et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040194085 Beaubien et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199603 Tafla et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205162 Parikh Oct 2004 A1
20040221034 Kausik et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050021706 Maggi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021862 Schroeder et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038967 Umbehocker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055420 Wyler Mar 2005 A1
20050076111 Cherkasova Apr 2005 A1
20050076339 Merril et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086645 Diao et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091612 Stabb et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050102683 Branson et al. May 2005 A1
20050108529 Juneau May 2005 A1
20050114296 Farber et al. May 2005 A1
20050157712 Rangarajan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163168 Sheth et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171959 Deforche et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182826 Knittel Aug 2005 A1
20050198571 Kramer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216569 Coppola et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223091 Zahavi et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223092 Sapiro et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050229119 Torvinen Oct 2005 A1
20050259672 Eduri Nov 2005 A1
20050273507 Yan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015865 Schneider et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020684 Mukherjee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020714 Girouard et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026275 Gilmour et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036720 Faulk, Jr. Feb 2006 A1
20060041614 Oe Feb 2006 A1
20060047787 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059246 Grove Mar 2006 A1
20060063534 Kokkonen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069808 Mitchell et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075084 Lyon Apr 2006 A1
20060085536 Meyer et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060120385 Atchison et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060179080 Meek et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195866 Thukral Aug 2006 A1
20060209701 Zhang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218304 Mukherjee et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227740 McLaughlin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235961 Klein Oct 2006 A1
20060251339 Gokturk et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259690 Vittal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259984 Juneau Nov 2006 A1
20060265497 Ohata et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282758 Simons et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070011267 Overton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016736 Takeda et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021998 Laithwaite et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038994 Davis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050703 Lebel Mar 2007 A1
20070055764 Dilley et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076872 Juneau Apr 2007 A1
20070086429 Lawrence et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088805 Cyster Apr 2007 A1
20070094325 Ih et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070118640 Subramanian et al. May 2007 A1
20070136469 Nusbickel Jun 2007 A1
20070143672 Lipton et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070168517 Weller Jul 2007 A1
20070174442 Sherman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174490 Choi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198982 Bolan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070214454 Edwards et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219795 Park et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220010 Ertugrul Sep 2007 A1
20070226058 Lorenzen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239610 Lemelson Oct 2007 A1
20070245010 Am et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245299 Sung et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250560 Wein et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250611 Bhogal et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253377 Janneteau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266151 Friedland et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271375 Hwang Nov 2007 A1
20070271385 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280229 Kenney Dec 2007 A1
20070288588 Wein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299869 Clary et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299965 Nieh et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070300152 Baugher Dec 2007 A1
20080025304 Venkataswami et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037432 Cohen et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080050021 Plant Feb 2008 A1
20080065724 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065745 Leighton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071859 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082551 Farber et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086559 Davis et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098310 Choi Apr 2008 A1
20080104268 Farber et al. May 2008 A1
20080104502 Olston May 2008 A1
20080114875 Anastas May 2008 A1
20080172488 Jawahar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183672 Canon et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183721 Bhogal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080208961 Kim Aug 2008 A1
20080215583 Gunawardena et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215718 Stolorz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215735 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215750 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215755 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222281 Dilley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222291 Weller et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228574 Stewart et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080250327 Li et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080289029 Kim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090029644 Sue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031367 Sue Jan 2009 A1
20090031368 Ling Jan 2009 A1
20090031376 Riley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037517 Frei Feb 2009 A1
20090055542 Zhao et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090063690 Verthein et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083228 Shatz et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089448 Sze et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119388 Kikuchi et al. May 2009 A1
20090122714 Kato May 2009 A1
20090187575 DaCosta Jul 2009 A1
20090248786 Richardson Oct 2009 A1
20090248852 Fuhrmann et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248858 Sivasubramanian et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248893 Richardson Oct 2009 A1
20090319636 Tokumi Dec 2009 A1
20090327460 Yoo et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327517 Sivasubramanian Dec 2009 A1
20090327914 Adar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100005403 Rozmaryn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100034470 Valencia-Campo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070603 Moss et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100195908 Bechtel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211459 Seeman et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100318508 Brawer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325615 Ramot Dec 2010 A1
20100332650 Aisen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040893 Karaoguz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055627 Zawacki et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110096987 Morales et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110145715 Malloy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110252142 Richardson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252143 Baumback et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264511 Zhang Oct 2011 A1
20120042277 Lin-Hendel Feb 2012 A1
20120164621 Katz et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130007273 Baumback et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130031040 Modha Jan 2013 A1
20130191450 Bodenhamer et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130198298 Li et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140113600 El Gamal et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140129707 Baumback et al. May 2014 A1
20140135105 Quan et al. May 2014 A1
20140143320 Sivasubramanian et al. May 2014 A1
20140219279 Gross et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140250051 Lahav et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257891 Richardson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140304406 Baumback et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140372511 Kapadia et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150012649 Baumback et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032801 Hart Jan 2015 A1
20150088968 Wei et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150156280 Vaswani et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150220990 Kobyakov et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150242379 Kuivinen et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150263927 Baumback et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150288593 Campbell Oct 2015 A1
20150326491 Baumback et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150333997 Mermoud et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150358250 Baumback et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160020972 Baumback et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160057072 Baumback et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160188181 Smith Jun 2016 A1
20160267354 Bettis et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170054621 Baumback et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170070446 Baumback et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170187591 Baumback et al. Jun 2017 A1
20180007121 Krishnan et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180054371 Baumback et al. Feb 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
101189598 May 2008 CN
WO 2007007960 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2012044587 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Bennami, M., et al., Resource Allocation for Autonomic Data Centers Using Analytic Performance Models, 2005, IEEE, 12 pages.
Chang, F., et al., Automatic Configuration and Run-time Adaptation of Distributed Applications, 2000, IEEE, 10 pages.
Kounev, S., et al., Autonomic QoS-Aware Resource Management in Grid Computing Using Online Performance Models, 2007, ICST, Valuetools, 2007, 10 pages.
Nilsson et al., IP-Address Lookup Using LC-Tries, IEEE Journalk on Selected Areas of Communication, Jun. 1999, vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 1083-1092.
Arcelli et al., “A New Technique for Image Magnification”, p. 53-61, 2009.
Feldmeier, Improving Gateway Performance With a Routing-Table Cache, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Computer Science, IEEE, Mar. 27, 1988, pp. 298-307.
Halpern, et al., Internet Draft, “Advertising Equal Cost Multipath routes in BGP; draft-bhatia-ecmp-routes-in-bgp-02.txt”, The Internet Society 2006, 16 pages.
Kalogiros et al, “Understanding Incentives for Prefix Aggregation in BGP”, Re-Architecting the Internet, ACM, Dec. 1, 2009, pp. 49-54.
Ludwig, “Traffic engineering with BGP”, Seminar “Internet Routing”, Technical University Berlin, Jul. 2, 2009, pp. 1-10.
Schlansker et al, “Killer Fabrics for Scalable Datacenters”, HP Technical Report, HPL-2009-26, 26 Feb. 26, 2009, 16 pages.
Extended Search Report in European Application No. 16001480.9 dated Dec. 5, 2016.
Al-Fares, M. et al., A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture, SIGCOMM '08 Proceedings, Aug. 17, 2008, pp. 63-74, 66-68, 70-71, Seattle, WA.
McCulloch et al. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, vol. 5, 1943, 19 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130311604 A1 Nov 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13372708 Feb 2012 US
Child 13942556 US
Parent 12240583 Sep 2008 US
Child 13372708 US