Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via a communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a browser application to request a web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.
Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can require further consideration of latencies associated with delivery of the individual components as well as the originally requested content as a whole.
With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, that are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices, such as a browser application, typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resource reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced computing devices. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider(s) (or any service provider on behalf of the content provider(s)) would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page and/or data associated with the embedded resources.
Traditionally, a number of methodologies exist which measure the performance associated with the exchange of data such as in the environment described above. For example, some methodologies provide for limited measurement of performance metrics associated with network side processing of a content request. Other methodologies allow for limited measurement of performance metrics associated with a content request as measured from a browser application's perspective.
Many of the attendant advantages and aspects of the present disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to monitoring the performance and processing of data exchanges between client computing devices and server computing devices. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to monitoring a data exchange involving a request by a client computing device for an original resource including one or more embedded resources. Performance data can then be used to assess performance related to the processing of the client request for the original resource and any embedded resources. Additionally, the processed performance data can be used to support modifications to the original resource and/or embedded resources to improve performance for subsequent client requests for the original resource and/or embedded resources.
Traditionally, network servers can collect latency information associated with a server's processing of a client request for a resource. For example, network servers can measure a time associated with processing an incoming client request, identifying/obtaining the requested resource, and initiating the transmission of the resource responsive to the client request. Additionally, client computing devices can collect latency information associated with the client computing device's initiation of a resource request and receipt of the resource responsive to the request. Aspects of the present disclosure, which will be described further below, are directed to identifying and providing additional information to improve the performance assessment related to the processing of a client request for an original resource and any embedded resources. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.
As illustrated in
In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. As also illustrated in
Each of the client computing devices 102 can accordingly include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over the network 114. For example, the client computing devices 102 may include networking components and additional software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet. As previously described, the client computing device 102 may include an additional, separate browser software application. The client computing devices 102 can also be associated with, or otherwise include, other computing components, such as proxy applications, for further facilitating communications via the Internet or an intranet. As previously described, the client computing components 104 can each function as a browser software application for requesting content from a network resource. Additionally, in an illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can function as a proxy application for managing browser application content requests to the network resource. In other embodiments, the client computing devices 102 may be otherwise associated with an external proxy application, as well as any other additional software applications or software services, used in conjunction with requests for content.
With continued reference to
With yet further continued reference to
As illustrated in
One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in
With reference now to
With reference to
In one embodiment, prior to initiating a resource request, the client computing component 104 associates a record identifier with the resource request. As will be described further below, the record identifier can be used to track performance metrics associated with processing the requested resource and any embedded resources. In one example, the record identifier may be attached to the resource request as a header or otherwise embedded in the request. The client computing component 104 then transmits the resource request with the record identifier. However, as will also be described further below, the client computing component 104 can alternatively transmit the associated record identifier in a separate transmission from the resource request.
It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art and others that the client computing component 104 can generate the resource request and associated record identifier itself or receive one or the other or both from another storage or computing device. For example, another computing device, such as processing device 116, can be used to determine whether a test to monitor performance metrics associated with processing a particular resource, such as a Web page, should be conducted. In this example, the processing device 116 can send the test request, which includes a resource identifier corresponding to the desired resource request and a record identifier further associated with the resource identifier, to the client computing device 102.
In one illustrative embodiment, as shown in
Continuing with the present example and in further reference to
As further illustrated in
In this illustrative example, the performance measurement component 106 at the client computing device 102 obtains the requested resource, continues monitoring the processing of the requested resource, and forwards the requested resource to the client computing component 104. For example, the performance measurement component 106 may serve as a proxy application for receiving the requested resource or otherwise intercepting the requested resource. The client computing component 104 also tracks performance metrics associated with the processing of the requested resource. Upon receipt of the requested resource, the client computing component 104 begins processing the content for display, execution, or storage on a resource associated with the client computing device 102. This processing may include all or some of, for example, rendering into a framebuffer or other memory, displaying on a local or remote display device, execution on a virtual machine, and so forth. As will be further described below, the above described functions apply to the processing of the originally requested resource, as well as any embedded resources.
With reference now to
The performance metric information from the client computing component 104 and/or the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 can also include basic resource information, such as an identification of the resource type, a link to a header associated with the requested resource, a size of the resource, and the like. Even further, the performance metric information can include underlying computer resource information, such as a resolution of the display of the client computing device 102, a version of the browser application software, an identification of any plugins associated with the browser application software, an identification of any updates to the operating system of the client computing device 102, and the like.
With continued reference to
In one illustrative embodiment, once the client computing component 104 completes processing of the requested resource and any embedded resources, the client computing component 104 identifies performance metric information that the client computing component 104 monitored and/or otherwise collected related to such processing. In this example, the client computing component 104 provides the identified performance metric information with the record identifier associated with the requested resource to the metric processing component 118. Upon receipt of this information, the metric processing component 118 then requests any further performance metric information related to the requested resource and any embedded resources from the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. In response, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102 identifies and provides performance metric information with the record identifier associated with the requested resource to the metric processing component 118. The metric processing component 118 can use the record identifier to aggregate the received performance metric information. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art and others that the identified performance metric information can be transmitted to the metric processing component 118 by a number of alternative methodologies and/or components.
With reference now to
With reference now to
At block 502, a client computing component 104 identifies an original resource request. As previously mentioned, the client computing component 104 can generate the original resource request or receive the original resource request from another computing device, such as processing device 116. In one example, the original resource request can be for a Web page, such as http://example.com. At block 504, the client computing component 104 associates a record identifier (RID) with the original resource request. The RID may be a unique identifier associated with the original resource request. As will be further described below, the RID can also be associated with any embedded resources included in a response to the original resource request. Even further, although not illustrated, in an alternative embodiment, in the event that the client computing component 104 does not need a RID, the client computing component 104 may not associate a RID with the resource request at shown at block 504.
At block 506, the resource request is transmitted to another entity. In this example, the resource request is transmitted to the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. As previously mentioned, the performance measurement component 106 can alternatively intercept the transmission request as it is being routed to a content provider 108 for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the resource request may itself contain the RID, such that the resource request and associated RID are transmitted as part of the same transmission. For example, the RID can be included as a portion of the resource URL used to request the resource. Alternatively or additionally, the RID may be transmitted in a second communication, either before or after the transmission including the resource request. For example, a “start new request group” command, including the RID may be issued before or after the initial resource request. In one further alternative embodiment, the client computing component 104 may not include a RID with the issuance of a “start new request group” command, and in this case, the performance measurement component 106 may generate, or otherwise obtain, such a RID upon receipt of the “start new request group” command.
Continuing at block 508, a determination is made at the client computing component 104 regarding whether any additional resources need to be requested to fulfill the original resource request. As appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art, a response to the original resource request can be returned to the client computing component 104 which includes a number of resource URLs corresponding to a number of embedded resources required to fulfill the original resource request. In one embodiment, if such additional resources are identified, processing returns to block 506 where the client computing component 104 transmits one or more requests for the identified embedded resources with the RID associated with the original resource request.
Alternatively or additionally, the client computing component 104 can assign a component record identifier (CRID) to each request for an embedded resource at optional block 510. In this example, when processing returns to block 506, the client computing component 104 can transmit the one or more embedded resource requests with the respectively assigned CRIDs. In an illustrative embodiment, the requests for embedded resources can be transmitted with respective CRIDs alone or together with the RID of the original resource request. As embedded resource requests (or component requests) are fulfilled, the returned content is processed by the client computing component 101. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that a response to an embedded resource request can include links to further embedded resources. As such, the functionality associated with blocks 506-510 may be repeated as described above until no resource requests are outstanding and no more additional resources need to be requested.
It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that resource requests are processed by the client computing device 100 in accordance with logic associated with the particular configuration of the browser software application. For example, the browser software application may be limited by a number of resource requests that can be made at one time, an order associated with the type of requests that can be made, an order based on a predetermined location for the requested resources on a display screen, or other limitations provided in the requested base resource.
Once the client computing component 104 determines at block 508 that no additional resources need to be obtained to fulfill the original resource request or any subsequent embedded resource request, processing can continue at optional block 512. At block 512, a termination command, such as “end new request group”, may be transmitted to indicate that the request, including requests for all embedded resources, has completed. Such a termination command may provide closure to a “start new request group” command, if one were issued as part of the first iteration of block 506. In this example, the start/termination commands can be received and used by the performance measurement component 106 to determine which requested resources are associated with a particular originally requested resource.
At block 514, once the client computing component 104 has completed processing the requested original resource and any embedded resources, the client computing component 104 provides monitored performance metric information to processing device 116. The client computing component 104 monitors such performance metric information throughout the processing of the original resource request from initiation of the original resource request to final rendering of the requested resource and any embedded resources. The performance metric information can include, for example, timing data associated with the initiation of each request, receipt of a response to each request, and rendering of each requested resource, as well as other information as described herein. The routine 500 ends at block 516.
With reference now to
At block 602, the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing component 102 receives (or intercepts) an original resource request from the client computing component 104. In one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 receives the RID with the original resource request. Alternatively, the RID can be provided as a part of a separate transmission, and accordingly, in this case, the performance measurement component 106 receives the RID separately. At block 604, the performance measurement component 106 associates the RID with the original resource request. In accordance with other embodiments discussed above, the original resource request may be preceded or followed by a command or instructions, such as a “start new request group” command. Such commands may be transmitted with or without a RID, as set forth above. If such commands are received at the performance measurement component 106 without a RID, the performance measurement component can generate, or otherwise obtain, a RID to associate the original resource request at block 604.
Continuing at block 606, the original resource may be requested, such as by proxying or forwarding the resource request to the content provider 108 via network 114. The resource request may be modified from its original form before sending, such as by stripping headers including the associated RID. The performance measurement component 106 also monitors the processing, including fulfillment, of the resource request at block 606. For example, the performance measurement component can identify performance metric information related to the initiation of the resource request, the receipt of first and last bytes of data for each requested resource and any embedded resources, the receipt of responsive content, and the like. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art, once a response to the resource request is received at the performance measurement component 106, the response is returned to the requesting application.
At block 608, a determination is made by the performance measurement component 106 regarding whether a subsequent resource request related to the original resource request has been made by the client computing component 104 and accordingly received (or intercepted) by the performance measurement component. If a subsequent embedded resource request (which may bear the same RID as the original resource request, an appropriate CRID, and/or be within a start/stop command window) is received, processing continues at block 610. At block 610, the performance measurement component 106 requests any embedded resources and monitors the processing of the requested embedded resources as similarly described above in reference to the originally requested resource and block 606. The functionality associated with blocks 608-610 may be repeated as described above until no resource requests are outstanding.
If the performance measurement component 106 determines that no more outstanding resource requests remain at block 608, processing continues at block 612. Specifically, the performance measurement component 106 provides monitored performance metric information to processing device 116. The performance measurement component 102 monitors such performance metric information throughout the processing of the original resource request, from initiation of the original resource request to final rendering of the requested resource and any embedded resources. The performance metric information can include, for example, timing data associated with the initiation of each request, receipt of a response to each request, and receipt of first and last packets of data for each of the original resource request and any embedded resource requests, as well as other additional information as described herein.
In one illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 can identify performance metric information for providing to the processing device 116 in a variety of ways. For example, in one embodiment, the performance measurement component 106 can store performance measurement information in a log file together with identifiers to associate performance metric information with corresponding resource requests. In this example a set of requested resources may be joined by common RIDs, common CRIDs, associated CRID (e.g., where each component has a distinct CRID, but the distinct CRIDs of a single group have been associated or otherwise linked together, such as by a RID). In another illustrative embodiment, the performance measurement component can retrieve performance metric information from a log file based on timing information associated with a resource request. For example, a set of requested resources may be defined as the resources requested or fulfilled between a start command and an end command, or between an original resource request (inclusive) and a stop command. The routine 600 ends at block 614.
With reference now to
With reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, events 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720 correspond to the following time-based events identified by the performance metric information. Event 712 identifies a Start Event representing a time at which the corresponding resource was known to be required by the client computing component 104. Event 714 identifies a NetStart Event representing a time at which the corresponding resource was actually requested by the client computing component 104. The timing of the NetStart Event may not be the same as the Start Event if, for example, the browser software application limits the number of concurrent connections with a particular domain. Event 716 identifies a First Byte Event representing a time at which the first byte (or first packet) of the requested resource is received by the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. Event 718 identifies a Last Byte Event representing a time at which the last byte (or last packet) of the requested resource is received by the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. Finally, event 720 identifies a Render Event representing a time at which the client computing component 104 finishes rendering the requested resource.
A second portion 730 of the user interface 700 corresponds to a representation illustrating the occurrence of each of the time-based events 712, 714, 716, 718, and 720 for all or some of the resources requested in resolving the original resource request. In one embodiment, the representation horizontally corresponds to time and vertically corresponds to an ordered listing of the requested resources. In one example, the order can specifically correspond to an order in which the requested resources are initially identified by the client computing component 104. In addition, the second portion 730 of the display includes a variety of additional information adjacent to the time-based event representation for each resource. For example, in a first column 732, a resource type for each resource may be provided, e.g., HTML, image, CSS, JavaScript, and the like. In a second column 734, a link to a header corresponding to each requested resource may be provided. In a third column 736, an HTTP response status code corresponding to each requested resource can be provided. Code 200, for example, is indicative of a standard response for successful HTTP requests. Finally, in a fourth column 738, the size of each resource can be provided.
In another embodiment, yet further additional information may be displayed in the user interface 700. For example, the user interface 700 may display the total processing time, both numerically and graphically, associated with processing the original resource request including any embedded resource requests. In this example, an indicator 740 may illustrate a starting time while an indicator 746 may illustrate an ending time, both associated with the processing of the original resource request as a whole. Additionally, when the original resource request is a request for a Web page, the user interface 700 may illustrate a time, both numerically and graphically, at which all resources have been rendered in a portion of a Web page which is initially visible to a user without scrolling. This portion of the Web page is often referred as an “above the fold,” “above the scroll,” or “above the crease” portion. An indicator 744 in the user interface 700 of
The foregoing performance metric information provided in the user interface 700 may be identified and/or collected by a combination of the client computing component 104 and/or the performance measurement component 106 of the client computing device 102. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that additional performance metric information can be displayed. Such additionally displayed performance metric information can be obtained by the client computing device 102, by the performance measurement component 112 of the content provider 108, or based on further processing of any of the identified and/or collected performance metric information. It will also be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that each resource and/or each type of resource may be associated with all or only a portion of the above-described events and/or performance metric information. In addition, other events and/or indicators associated with the other events may be used and illustrated in the user interface 700.
In one specific example, an executable resource, such as a JavaScript resource, is not rendered and, accordingly, neither a Render Event 720 nor an associated indicator illustrating the transition between a Last Byte Event 718 and a Render Event 720 will be illustrated in the user interface 700 for that executable resource. However, the processing device 116 can indirectly determine and display a processing time associated with execution of the code once the code itself is obtained (i.e., receipt of the last byte of the code which corresponds to the Last Byte Event 718). Such processing time is inferred in the user interface 700 of
By providing and displaying the foregoing performance metric information as set forth above, a user of the processing device 116 can readily evaluate the performance associated with processing the originally requested resource, including any embedded resources. In particular, the user interface 700 can help a user identify any problems associated with the processing of the originally requested resource, as well as determine one or more solutions to the identified problem. Solutions for improving performance may include, for example, making changes to the content itself, to the organization of content within the originally requested resource, to the client computing component, and the like.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that while processing and monitoring functions have been described herein as being performed at various components of the client computing device, these functions can be distributed across one or more computing devices. In addition, the performance metric information monitored at the client computing device can be maintained globally by the client computing device and shared with all or some subset of the components of the client computing device.
It will further be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/372,708, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,489,737, entitled “MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION OF DATA EXCHANGES” and filed on Feb. 14, 2012, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/240,583, entitled “MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION OF DATA EXCHANGES” and filed on Sep. 29, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5649185 | Antognini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664106 | Caccavale | Sep 1997 | A |
5819033 | Caccavale | Oct 1998 | A |
5832517 | Knutsen, II | Nov 1998 | A |
5999636 | Juang | Dec 1999 | A |
6173322 | Hu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182125 | Borella et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6243761 | Mogul et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6377257 | Borrel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438592 | Killian | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473804 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6529910 | Fleskes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553419 | Ram | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560610 | Eatherton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611873 | Kanehara | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633324 | Stephens, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662233 | Skarpness et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697805 | Choquier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698013 | Bertero et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714975 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6820133 | Grove et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6920498 | Gourley et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6978418 | Bain et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7009943 | O'Neil | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023465 | Stephens, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065496 | Subbloie et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085825 | Pishevar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096193 | Beaudoin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107273 | Ohata et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114160 | Suryanarayana et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120871 | Harrington | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120874 | Shah et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146560 | Dang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7185084 | Sirivara et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7269657 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7316648 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343399 | Hayball et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346676 | Swildens et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7373599 | McElfresh et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7502836 | Menditto et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523181 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7555542 | Ayers et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7581224 | Romero | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7596150 | Baird et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7623460 | Miyazaki | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624169 | Lisiecki et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650376 | Blumenau | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653725 | Yahiro et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685270 | Vermeulen et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7685273 | Anastas et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7698418 | Shimada et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707071 | Rigole | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707173 | Nanavati et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725658 | Lang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739400 | Lindbo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748005 | Romero et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752301 | Maiocco et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7756032 | Feick et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765295 | Anastas et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7773596 | Marques | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7787380 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7860735 | Evanitsky | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865594 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7873065 | Mukerji et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7904875 | Hegyi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925782 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930393 | Baumback et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7933988 | Nasuto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937456 | McGrath | May 2011 | B2 |
7937477 | Day et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7949779 | Farber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7961736 | Ayyagari | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962597 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979509 | Malmskog et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8028090 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051166 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8069231 | Schran et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082348 | Averbuj et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8117306 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122124 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8165915 | Lucash | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8286176 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296429 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8316124 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8321568 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8452870 | Baumback et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8463877 | Richardson | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8468245 | Farber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489737 | Baumback et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8667127 | Bettis et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8762526 | Baumback et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8843625 | Baumback et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9071502 | Baumback et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088460 | Baumback et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9118543 | Baumback et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9160641 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9210099 | Baumback et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9367929 | Bettis et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9491073 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9628403 | Baumback et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9660890 | Baumback et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9769248 | Krishnan et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9794188 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9825831 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10027739 | Krishnan et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10104009 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010034771 | Hutsch et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020016802 | Hodgkinson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020062372 | Hong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069420 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073235 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099829 | Richards et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099850 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107913 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107944 | Bai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112049 | Elnozahy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116481 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116491 | Boyd | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120666 | Landsman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124098 | Shaw | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135611 | Deosaran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138437 | Lewin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138443 | Schran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143989 | Huitema et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150094 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150276 | Chang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156884 | Bertram et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161767 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161911 | Pinckney, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163882 | Bornstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165912 | Wenocur et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194382 | Kausik et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198963 | Wu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005111 | Allan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009488 | Hart, III | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033283 | Evans et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065784 | Herrod | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118249 | Edgar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120741 | Wu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128233 | Kasriel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130982 | Kasriel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131106 | Kasriel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149581 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172291 | Judge et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174648 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182305 | Balva et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182413 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200394 | Ashmore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204602 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217144 | Fu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221000 | Cherkasova | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229682 | Day | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233423 | Dilley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236836 | Borthwick | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039794 | Biby et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039820 | Colby et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049541 | Swahn | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049579 | Ims et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059796 | McLintock | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064293 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064558 | Miyake | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073596 | Kloninger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083307 | Uysal | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040128538 | Gmuender et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167981 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040194085 | Beaubien et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199603 | Tafla et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205162 | Parikh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221034 | Kausik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050021706 | Maggi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021862 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038967 | Umbehocker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055420 | Wyler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076111 | Cherkasova | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076339 | Merril et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086645 | Diao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091612 | Stabb et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102683 | Branson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108529 | Juneau | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114296 | Farber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157712 | Rangarajan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163168 | Sheth et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171959 | Deforche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182826 | Knittel | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198571 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216569 | Coppola et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223091 | Zahavi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223092 | Sapiro et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229119 | Torvinen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259672 | Eduri | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273507 | Yan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015865 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020684 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020714 | Girouard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026275 | Gilmour et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036720 | Faulk, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041614 | Oe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047787 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059246 | Grove | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063534 | Kokkonen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069808 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075084 | Lyon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085536 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120385 | Atchison et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179080 | Meek et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209701 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218304 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227740 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235961 | Klein | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251339 | Gokturk et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259690 | Vittal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259984 | Juneau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265497 | Ohata et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282758 | Simons et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011267 | Overton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016736 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021998 | Laithwaite et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038994 | Davis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050703 | Lebel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055764 | Dilley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076872 | Juneau | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086429 | Lawrence et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088805 | Cyster | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094325 | Ih et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118640 | Subramanian et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136469 | Nusbickel | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143672 | Lipton et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168517 | Weller | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174442 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174490 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198982 | Bolan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214454 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219795 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220010 | Ertugrul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226058 | Lorenzen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239610 | Lemelson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245010 | Am et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245299 | Sung et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250560 | Wein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250611 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253377 | Janneteau et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266151 | Friedland et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271375 | Hwang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271385 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280229 | Kenney | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288588 | Wein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299869 | Clary et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299965 | Nieh et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300152 | Baugher | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080025304 | Venkataswami et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037432 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050021 | Plant | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065724 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065745 | Leighton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071859 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082551 | Farber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086559 | Davis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098310 | Choi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104268 | Farber et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104502 | Olston | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114875 | Anastas | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172488 | Jawahar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183672 | Canon et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183721 | Bhogal et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208961 | Kim | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215583 | Gunawardena et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215718 | Stolorz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215735 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215750 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215755 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222281 | Dilley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222291 | Weller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228574 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250327 | Li et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289029 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090029644 | Sue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031367 | Sue | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031368 | Ling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031376 | Riley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037517 | Frei | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055542 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063690 | Verthein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083228 | Shatz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089448 | Sze et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119388 | Kikuchi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090122714 | Kato | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187575 | DaCosta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248786 | Richardson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248852 | Fuhrmann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248858 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319636 | Tokumi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327460 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327517 | Sivasubramanian | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327914 | Adar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005403 | Rozmaryn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034470 | Valencia-Campo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070603 | Moss et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195908 | Bechtel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211459 | Seeman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100318508 | Brawer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325615 | Ramot | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332650 | Aisen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040893 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055627 | Zawacki et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110096987 | Morales et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110145715 | Malloy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110252142 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252143 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264511 | Zhang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120042277 | Lin-Hendel | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120164621 | Katz et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130007273 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031040 | Modha | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130191450 | Bodenhamer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198298 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140113600 | El Gamal et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129707 | Baumback et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135105 | Quan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143320 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140219279 | Gross et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250051 | Lahav et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257891 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304406 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140372511 | Kapadia et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150012649 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032801 | Hart | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150088968 | Wei et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150156280 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150220990 | Kobyakov et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242379 | Kuivinen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150263927 | Baumback et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150288593 | Campbell | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326491 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333997 | Mermoud et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150358250 | Baumback et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160020972 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160057072 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160188181 | Smith | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160267354 | Bettis et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170054621 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070446 | Baumback et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170187591 | Baumback et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180007121 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180054371 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101189598 | May 2008 | CN |
WO 2007007960 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2012044587 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bennami, M., et al., Resource Allocation for Autonomic Data Centers Using Analytic Performance Models, 2005, IEEE, 12 pages. |
Chang, F., et al., Automatic Configuration and Run-time Adaptation of Distributed Applications, 2000, IEEE, 10 pages. |
Kounev, S., et al., Autonomic QoS-Aware Resource Management in Grid Computing Using Online Performance Models, 2007, ICST, Valuetools, 2007, 10 pages. |
Nilsson et al., IP-Address Lookup Using LC-Tries, IEEE Journalk on Selected Areas of Communication, Jun. 1999, vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 1083-1092. |
Arcelli et al., “A New Technique for Image Magnification”, p. 53-61, 2009. |
Feldmeier, Improving Gateway Performance With a Routing-Table Cache, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Computer Science, IEEE, Mar. 27, 1988, pp. 298-307. |
Halpern, et al., Internet Draft, “Advertising Equal Cost Multipath routes in BGP; draft-bhatia-ecmp-routes-in-bgp-02.txt”, The Internet Society 2006, 16 pages. |
Kalogiros et al, “Understanding Incentives for Prefix Aggregation in BGP”, Re-Architecting the Internet, ACM, Dec. 1, 2009, pp. 49-54. |
Ludwig, “Traffic engineering with BGP”, Seminar “Internet Routing”, Technical University Berlin, Jul. 2, 2009, pp. 1-10. |
Schlansker et al, “Killer Fabrics for Scalable Datacenters”, HP Technical Report, HPL-2009-26, 26 Feb. 26, 2009, 16 pages. |
Extended Search Report in European Application No. 16001480.9 dated Dec. 5, 2016. |
Al-Fares, M. et al., A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture, SIGCOMM '08 Proceedings, Aug. 17, 2008, pp. 63-74, 66-68, 70-71, Seattle, WA. |
McCulloch et al. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, vol. 5, 1943, 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130311604 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13372708 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 13942556 | US | |
Parent | 12240583 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13372708 | US |