Monitoring performance of downhole equipment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6310559
  • Patent Number
    6,310,559
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 18, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 30, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method for use with equipment located downhole in a subterranean well includes providing a model describing behavior of the equipment and measuring a state of the equipment downhole. An indication is received of the state at a surface of the well, and the model is modified based on the indication. The system includes a communication link, a circuit and a machine. The communication link is adapted to furnish an indication of a state of the equipment to the surface of the well. The circuit is located downhole and is adapted to detect the state and produce the indication. The machine is adapted to provide a model describing behavior of the equipment and modify the model based on the indication.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention relates to monitoring performance of downhole equipment.




In the production of oil and gas, the reliable operation of downhole equipment typically is of paramount importance. For example, one class of downhole equipment is actuator-based equipment that is used to displace downhole parts, such as pads and sleeves. To accomplish this, an actuator of the equipment may use, as examples, an electromechanical arrangement (an arrangement in which a motor actuates a screw drive, for example) or an electrohydraulic arrangement (an arrangement in which an electric motor is driven by a hydraulic pump or jack cylinder). Quite often, the actuator is used in a well process control application in which the consequences of failure may be potentially very expensive, as failure of the actuator may cause lost production, damage to the well, damage to the reservoir or abandonment of the well, as just a few examples.




A valve is one type of downhole equipment that may use an actuator. For example, a sleeve valve


10


(schematically depicted in

FIG. 1

) may include a linear actuator


9


to control the flow of well fluid from a producing formation into a central passageway of a production tubing


12


. To accomplish this, the valve


10


may include a generally cylindrical sleeve


26


that closely circumstances the outside of the tubing


12


. In the operation of the valve


10


, a motor


14


(of the actuator


9


) actuates a ball screw drive


20


(also of the actuator


9


) to move the sleeve


26


to selectively restrict the flow of well fluid through radial ports


8


of the tubing


12


.




Performance aspects of the linear actuator


9


may change over time, and unfortunately the actuator


9


may eventually fail. Therefore, it is often desirable for an operator at the surface of the well to know how the linear actuator


9


is performing in order to predict when the actuator


9


is going to fail. Without this knowledge, the operator may unexpectedly lose control of the valve


10


and thus, not be able to plan and take remedial actions (final positioning of the valve


10


, as an example). As a result, production may be lost due to the unexpected loss of valve control. It may also be advantageous to observe the performance of the valve


10


for purposes of improving future valve designs.




One way to monitor the performance of the linear actuator


9


is to place circuitry (not shown) downhole to monitor selected parameters (of the actuator


9


), such as voltages, currents, speeds and positions. When one or more of the monitored parameters fall outside of predefined limits, the downhole circuitry may transmit stimuli (signals on a bus, for example) uphole to indicate this event. A potential difficulty with this arrangement is that mere indication(s) of one or more limits being exceeded may not sufficiently describe the performance of the linear actuator


9


or provide advance warning of future problems. In other arrangements, downhole circuitry (not shown) may sample selected parameters of the linear actuator


9


at a predefined rate (a rate above the Nyquist rate, for example) so that a continual stream of information may be transmitted uphole that indicates different actual performance aspects of the actuator


9


in real time. However, this arrangement may consume a significant amount of the bandwidth that is available for communicating with downhole equipment.




Thus, there is a continuing need for an arrangement to address one or more of the difficulties described above.




SUMMARY




In one embodiment of the invention, a method for use with equipment located downhole in a subterranean well includes providing a model describing behavior of the equipment and measuring a state of the equipment downhole. An indication is received of the state at a surface of the well, and the model is modified based on the indication.




In another embodiment of invention, a system includes equipment located downhole in a subterranean well, a communication link, a circuit and a machine. The communication link is adapted to furnish an indication of a state of the equipment at a surface of the well, and the circuit is located downhole and adapted to detect the state and produce the indication. The machine is adapted to provide a model describing behavior of the equipment and modify the model based on the indication.




Other embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the following description, from the drawing and from the claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a valve of the prior art.





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of a system to monitor performance of a downhole actuator according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a monitoring circuit of

FIG. 2

according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of a valve according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 5

is a schematic diagram illustrating a model of the system.





FIGS. 6 and 7

are plots of voltages and currents derived from the behavioral model illustrating a performance of a linear actuator of the system.





FIG. 8

is a schematic diagram of a system to monitor performances of various pieces of downhole equipment according to an embodiment of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 2

, an embodiment


28


of a system to monitor performance of downhole equipment (located in a subterranean well) in accordance with the invention may include a downhole monitoring circuit


60


and a machine, such as a computer system


72


, that is located at a surface


29


of the well. As an example, the downhole equipment may include a linear actuator


32


(an electrical schematic of the linear actuator


32


is shown in

FIG. 2

) that forms part of a downhole production valve. For purposes of evaluating performance of the linear actuator


32


(and valve), the computer system


72


may provide a model that describes different performance aspects of the linear actuator


32


. In this manner, the computer system


72


may execute a program (a simulation application program


73


, for example) to mathematically model the performance of the linear actuator


32


and display waveforms that illustrate different projected real time performance aspects of the actuator


32


.




The model may be developed using values obtained from one or more tests of the linear actuator


32


before the linear actuator


32


is installed downhole. Because over time the linear actuator


32


performs differently than when new, the performance aspects provided by the model may differ from the actuator's actual performance. However, as described below, the system


28


uses a feedback scheme to ensure that the performance aspects that are projected by the model are consistent with the observed actual performance of the linear actuator


32


. In this manner, the feedback scheme may utilize a downhole monitoring circuit


60


to capture states of the actuator


32


.




In contrast to the arrangements found in conventional systems, the monitoring circuit


60


captures a state of the linear actuator


32


by measuring selected characteristics, or parameters, of the actuator


32


. After performing the measurements, the monitoring circuit


60


transmits indications of the captured state uphole so that the model may be updated, and this process may be repeated over time to track the actual performance of the actuator


32


. As an example, the monitoring circuit


60


may measure the selected parameters while the actuator


32


is in steady state motion, and the parameters may include one or more of the following: an input terminal voltage of a driver


62


(of the motor


40


), an input terminal voltage of a power regulator


64


, a peak value of a current in the motor


40


, a peak value of a voltage of the motor


40


, an average value of a current of the motor


40


, an average value of a speed of the motor


40


and an average value of a voltage of the motor


40


, as just a few examples.




Thus, to summarize, for one feedback iteration, the monitoring circuit


60


captures a snapshot of a state of the actuator


32


, and this captured state is used to calibrate the model. The captured state reflects selected parameters that are measured by the monitoring circuit


60


. This process may be repeated over time to regularly update the model. As a result of this arrangement, the model provides continuous waveforms that illustrate actual performance aspects of the linear actuator


32


without consuming a significant amount of the bandwidth that is available for uphole communications.




To transmit indications of the measured state uphole, the monitoring circuit


60


may be coupled (via an internal bus


80


, for example) to a telemetry interface


66


. The telemetry interface


66


is adapted to transmit indications of the parameters uphole via a communication link, such as a cable


69


that includes wires for transmitting indications of the measured parameters uphole using standard telemetry methods. A processor


63


(a microprocessor or a microcontroller, as examples) may coordinate the performance of the measurements by the monitoring circuit


60


and may coordinate the activity of the telemetry interface


66


. The processor


63


may be coupled to the bus


80


.




At the surface


29


of the well, the computer system


72


may receive (via a cable interface


70


) indications of the selected parameters from the cable


69


and use the indications to calibrate the model to reflect the actual performance of the actuator


32


. As an example, in some embodiments, the computer system


72


may include a computer unit


77


that stores a description file


75


(on a disk drive, for example) that mathematically describes the operation of the linear actuator


32


. In this manner, the computer unit


77


may execute the simulation application


73


that, in turn, uses the description file


75


to mathematically model the actuator


32


so that different projected real time performance aspects of the linear actuator


32


may be displayed on a monitor


76


of the computer system


72


. The simulation application


73


may be stored on a disk drive of the computer unit


77


, for example. As the indications of the sampled parameters are received from downhole, the description file


75


may be manually updated (via a keyboard


79


of the computer system


72


, for example), or in some embodiments, the computer unit


77


may automatically update the description file


75


.




In some embodiments, the computer system


72


may not be located near the surface


29


of the well. For example, in some embodiments, the computer system


72


may communicate with circuitry near the well via a network link. Other arrangements are possible.




Electrically, the linear actuator


32


may include the power regulator


64


that receives power that is provided by a DC voltage source (not shown) that is located at the surface


29


. The power regulator


64


may furnish a regulated voltage to the motor driver


62


that selectively activates to the motor


40


, as directed by the processor


63


. The motor


40


may be a brushless DC motor, as an example.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, in some embodiments, the monitoring circuit


60


may include, as examples, a peak detector circuit


82


, a running average circuit


84


and a sampled data circuit


86


(including memory to store sampled values, for example) to measure selected parameters from the motor driver


62


and the motor


40


, as examples. The monitoring circuit


60


may receive each monitored voltage and/or current on an associated sensing line


94


that is coupled to an input terminal of an associated sample and hold (S/H) circuit


90


. The S/H circuit


90


samples a voltage/current of the associated sensing line


94


and provides the sampled analog value to an associated analog-to-digital converter (ADC)


88


that converts the analog value into a digital value. In this manner, for each voltage/current being measured, the monitoring circuit


60


may receive one of the sensing lines


94


and include one of the S/H circuits


90


and one of the ADCs


88


. Thus, each ADC


88


provides a digital value of the voltage/current to one of the peak


82


, running average


84


or sampled data


86


circuits, as examples. In some embodiments, the monitoring circuit


60


may include a bus interface


92


for establishing communication between the circuits


82


,


84


and


86


and the bus


80


.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, as an example, the linear actuator


32


may be part of a valve, such as a sleeve valve


30


, that controls the flow of well fluid into a central passageway


53


of a production tubing


52


. To accomplish this, the linear actuator


32


may control translational movement of a generally cylindrical sleeve


36


that is coaxial with and closely circumscribes the tubing


52


so that the sleeve


36


may control the flow of well fluid into radial ports


38


of the tubing


52


. In some embodiments, to move the sleeve


36


, the linear actuator


32


has a shaft


48


that is coupled (via an elbow


34


) to the sleeve


36


. In this manner, the motor driver


62


(see

FIG. 2

) may selectively activate (turn on and off, for example) the linear actuator


32


to selectively move the shaft


48


to generally control fluid communication through the ports


38


.




To move the shaft


48


, the motor


40


may be operatively coupled (via a shaft


43


, depicted in

FIG. 2

) to a gear box


42


to transfer torque to an actuator drive assembly, such as a ball screw drive


44


, to move the shaft


48


either in a direction that restricts flow into the radial ports


38


or in a direction that allows more fluid to flow into the radial ports


38


. The motor


40


, the gear box


42


and the ball screw drive


44


may all be housed inside a generally cylindrical sealed housing


45


that may be mounted to the outside of the production tubing


52


.




The performance of downhole equipment other than actuator-based equipment may be monitored using the techniques described above. Furthermore, the performance of other valves, such as a ball valve, for example, or other flow restriction devices may be monitored using the techniques described above.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, as an example, the simulation application program


73


may be a Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) application program that mathematically models the behavior of an electrical circuit that is described in a text file, such as the description file


75


, for example. In this manner, selected aspects of the system


28


may be electrically represented by a circuit schematic


100


that is described by text of the description file


75


. More particularly, circuit sections


102


,


104


,


106


and


108


of the schematic


100


may generally represent a downhole power delivery system; the motor driver


62


; the motor


40


; and the remaining portion of the valve


30


, respectively.




In some embodiments, the circuit section


102


may include a DC voltage source


110


that represents a DC voltage source (not shown) at the surface


29


that supplies power to the cable


69


. The cable


69


, in turn, includes wires for transferring the power downhole. The impedance of the cable


69


may be represented by a resistor


112


that is serially coupled between the DC voltage source


110


and an input terminal


114


of the circuit section


104


that represents the motor driver


62


.




As an example, the circuit section


104


may include a switch


120


that is in series with a resistor


122


. The switch


120


selectively provides power to the circuit section


106


(that represents the motor


40


) to simulate the on/off switching of the motor


40


by the motor driver


62


. The resistor


122


is coupled between the switch


120


and an input terminal


105


of the circuit section


106


and may represent, for example, the output resistance of the motor driver


62


. To establish a transient response of the circuit


100


, the circuit section


104


may include a DC voltage source


118


for establishing a peak terminal voltage of the motor


40


when the switch


120


is first turned on and a capacitor


116


that is serially coupled between the DC voltage source


118


and the input terminal


114


.




In some embodiments, the circuit section


106


may include a resistor


124


that has one terminal coupled to the input terminal


105


and is coupled in series with a resistor


126


. The resistor


124


may represent the resistive input impedance of the motor


40


, for example, and the resistor


126


may be used to sense the input current of the motor


40


for purposes of modeling a speed and a back electromotive force (EMF) of the motor


40


, as described below.




More particularly, the circuit section


106


may include an ideal AC/DC multiplier module


134


that has two sets of input terminals. One set of the input terminals is coupled to receive the voltage across the resistor


126


. The other set of input terminals is coupled to a DC potential that is established by a DC voltage source


136


. The inverting output terminal of the multiplier module


134


is coupled to ground. Thus, as a result of this arrangement, the non-inverting output terminal of the multiplier module


134


furnishes a summation of a scaled version of the input current of the motor


40


and a constant.




For purposes of representing frictional losses and inertia of the motor


40


, the circuit section


106


may include a resistor


138


(representing frictional losses) and an inductor


140


(representing inertia) that are serially coupled together between the non-inverting output terminal of the multiplier module


134


and a feedback node


139


. A resistor


141


may be coupled between the feedback node


139


and ground, and the voltage of the feedback node


139


may represent a speed of the motor


40


, as described below.




To use the voltage of the node


139


to derive a back EMF voltage of the motor


40


, the feedback node


139


is coupled to an inverting input terminal of one of two sets of input terminals of an ideal AC/DC multiplier module


130


. The non-inverting input terminal of this set of input terminals is coupled to ground. A DC voltage source


132


may be coupled across another set of input terminals of the multiplier module


130


. Due to this arrangement, the voltage across the output terminals of the multiplier module


130


represents the back EMF voltage of the motor


40


. An ideal voltage controlled voltage source


128


may couple the output voltage of the multiplier module


130


in series with the resistors


124


and


126


and serve as a buffer to add the back EMF voltage to the input circuit path.




In some embodiments, the frictional losses and the inertia attributable to the gearbox


42


and the remaining portion of the valve


30


are represented by a resistor


142


and an inductor


144


of the circuit portion


108


. In this manner, the resistor


142


(representing frictional losses) and the inductor


144


(representing inertia) are serially coupled together between the non-inverting output terminal of the multiplier module


134


and the feedback node


139


.




Due to the modeling of the system


28


that is defined by the circuit


100


, voltages and currents of the circuit


100


may be viewed, or “probed,” to monitor different performance aspects of the actuator


32


. For example, the voltages and/or currents may be viewed over an interval of time during which the actuator


32


is in steady state motion, for example. As examples, referring to

FIG. 6

, when the circuit


100


is simulated, the node


105


furnishes a voltage (called V


MOTOR


) that indicates a terminal voltage of the motor


40


, the output terminal of the source


128


furnishes a voltage (called V


BEMF


) that indicates the back EMF of the motor


40


, and the non-inverting output terminal of the multiplier module


134


furnishes a voltage (called V


TORQUE


) that indicates a torque of the motor


40


. Referring to

FIG. 7

, as other examples, the node


139


furnishes a voltage (called V


SPEED


) that indicates the speed of the motor


40


, and a current (called I


MOTOR


) of the resistor


124


indicates an input current of the motor


40


. These waveforms may be analyzed to determine different performance aspects of the system


28


to indicate, for example, when the actuator


32


is going to fail and reveal improvements for future actuator designs. In some embodiments, the computer system


72


may automatically determine when the actuator


32


is going to fail and alert the operator when this occurs. In some embodiments the computer system


72


may automatically take corrective action when potential failure of the actuator


32


is detected, such as shutting off the valve


30


, for example.




Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, referring to

FIG. 8

, a computer system


202


may provide mathematical models


204


for downhole equipment other than the linear actuator


32


described above. In this manner, the computer system


202


may mathematically model downhole sensor(s)


210


, controller(s)


208


, a telemetry system


212


and flow meter(s)


214


, as just a few examples. To accomplish this, a downhole monitoring circuit


206


may measure various parameters of these pieces of equipment, and a telemetry interface (not shown in

FIG. 8

) may transmit indications of these measurements uphole. These indications, in turn, may be used to modify and monitor the models


204


.




The computer system


202


may use the models


204


to detect equipment failure. For example, one of the sensors


210


may indicate a formation pressure, and the particular sensor


210


may indicate a rapid change in pressure. However, via the model


204


, the computer system


202


may determine a properly functioning sensor cannot measure such a rapid pressure change. As a result, the computer system


202


may automatically alert the operator that the particular sensor


210


has failed, or the computer system


202


may automatically take corrective action, such as switching in a new sensor downhole to replace the failed sensor


210


.




As another example, the computer system


202


may obtain bus voltages, among other parameters, from the telemetry system


212


. Based on the mathematical model


204


of the telemetry system


212


, the computer system


202


may determine that a segment of the telemetry system


212


has failed. The computer system


202


may, for example, automatically reroute communications to bypass the failed segment.




While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for use with equipment located downhole in a subterranean well, comprising:providing a model describing behavior of the equipment; measuring a state of the equipment downhole; receiving an indication of the state at a surface of the well; and modifying the model based on the indication.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: using the model to observe a performance of the equipment.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:automatically indicating potential failure of the equipment based on a performance projected by the model.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:automatically taking corrective action based on a performance projected by the model.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the act of using comprises: executing a circuit simulation program.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the act of using comprises: monitoring a plot of a characteristic of the equipment over time.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the characteristic comprises a voltage.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the characteristic comprises a current.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the state comprises a sampled voltage.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the state comprises a sampled current.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the state comprises a sampled peak value.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the state comprises a sampled average value.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:transmitting a stimuli from downhole near the equipment to produce the indication at the surface.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the equipment comprises an actuator.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the equipment comprises a sensor.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the equipment comprises a controller.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the equipment comprises a telemetry system.
  • 18. A system comprising:equipment located downhole in a subterranean well; a communication link adapted to furnish an indication of a state of the equipment to a surface of the well; a circuit located downhole and adapted to detect the state and produce the indication; and a machine adapted to: provide a model describing behavior of the equipment; and modify the model based on the indication.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is adapted to modify the model based on data input by a user, the data indicating the state.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is adapted to automatically modify the model based on the indication furnished by the communication link.
  • 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine comprises a computer system.
  • 22. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is located near the surface of the well.
  • 23. The system of claim 18, wherein the equipment comprises an actuator.
  • 24. The system of claim 18, wherein the equipment comprises a sensor.
  • 25. The system of claim 18, wherein the equipment comprises a controller.
  • 26. The system of claim 18, wherein the equipment comprises a telemetry system.
  • 27. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is further adapted to display a performance of the equipment based on the model.
  • 28. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is further adapted to display a plot of a characteristic of the equipment based on the model.
  • 29. The system of claim 18, wherein the machine is further adapted to take corrective action based on a performance of the equipment projected by the model.
  • 30. The system of claim 18, wherein the circuit comprises a peak detector.
  • 31. The system of claim 18, wherein the circuit comprises an averaging circuit.
  • 32. The system of claim 18, wherein the circuit comprises a sample and hold circuit.
US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
4142148 Johansson Feb 1979
4633954 Dixon et al. Jan 1987
4695957 Peltier Sep 1987
4969130 Wason Nov 1990
5123017 Simpkins Jun 1992
5132904 Lamp Jul 1992
5210704 Husseiny May 1993
5253184 Kleinschnitz Oct 1993
5331579 Maguire Jul 1994
5862513 Mezzatesta Jan 1999
5927854 Kroll Jul 1999
5948271 Wardwell Sep 1999
5966511 Temma Oct 1999
6006171 Vines Dec 1999
6012015 Tubel Jan 2000
6046685 Tubel Apr 2000
6069875 Miller May 2000
6070125 Murphy May 2000
6112817 Voll Sep 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 9746793 Dec 1997 WO
WO 0029707 May 2000 WO