Monitoring software provisioning

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9477570
  • Patent Number
    9,477,570
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 26, 2008
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 25, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A provisioning server can actively monitor the software provisioning processes being performed on a target machine to determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes and notify an administrator or user of the status and integrity. The provisioning server can be configured to include a monitoring module and a message module. The monitoring module can be configured to monitor software provisioning processes being performed on a target machine and determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes. The message module can be configured send notification to the administrator or user of the status and integrity of the provisioning processes.
Description
FIELD

This invention relates generally to software provisioning.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Software provisioning is the process of selecting a target machine, such as a server, loading the appropriate software (operating system, device drivers, middleware, and applications), and customizing and configuring the system and the software to make it ready for operation. Software provisioning can entail a variety of tasks, such as creating or changing a boot image, specifying parameters, e.g. IP address, IP gateway, to find associated network and storage resources, and then starting the machine and its newly-loaded software. Typically, a system administrator will perform these tasks using various tools because of the complexity of these tasks. Unfortunately, there is a lack of provisioning control tools that can adequately integrate and automate these tasks.


Typically, once software provisioning processes have begun for a target machine, the system administrator cannot determine if the software provisioning processes are executing properly unless the administrator examines the target machine. Usually, the system administrator will examine the target machine to determine if the process executed properly and if the target machine is functioning properly after the processes are complete. If a software provisioning process stalls or terminates before completion, the administrator or user may unaware of the error. Because the administrator is unaware, the target machine may remain dormant until the administrator realizes that a problem has occurred and restarts the provisioning process. This can waste time if the administrator does not regularly monitor the target machines during the provisioning processes. To cure this, the administrator must actively monitor the provisioning processes which also consumes the administrator's time. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a provisioning environment in which a provisioning server can actively monitor target machines during the software provisioning processes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various features of the embodiments can be more fully appreciated, as the same become better understood with reference to the following detailed description of the embodiments when considered in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates an overall provisioning environment in which various embodiments of the present teachings can be practiced;



FIG. 2 illustrates the overall provisioning environment in which a provisioning server can actively monitor software provisioning processes, according to various embodiments;



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary hardware configuration for a provisioning server, according to various embodiments; and



FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart for monitoring software provisioning processes, according to various embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the present invention are described by referring mainly to exemplary embodiments thereof. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize that the same principles are equally applicable to, and can be implemented in, all types of information and systems, and that any such variations do not depart from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Moreover, in the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying figures, which illustrate specific embodiments. Electrical, mechanical, logical and structural changes may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.


Embodiments of the present teachings relate to systems and methods for actively monitoring software provisioning processes on target machines. More particularly, a provisioning server can actively monitor the software provisioning processes being performed on a target machine to determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes and notify an administrator or user of the status and integrity.


In embodiments, the provisioning server can be configured to include a monitoring module and a message module. The monitoring module can be configured to monitor software provisioning processes being performed on a target machine and determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes. The message module can be configured send notification to the administrator or user of the status and integrity of the provisioning processes.


In embodiments, to monitor the provisioning processes, the monitoring module can be configured to receive status messages from a provisioning client assisting the target machine during the software provisioning. Additionally, if a provisioning client is not available, the monitoring module can be to receive the status messages from the target machine or other software instantiated on the target machine, directly. The status messages can include status information about the software provisioning processes. The status information can include the progress of the provisioning processes (amount of the processes completed; specific point reach in the provisioning), the integrity of the processes (still in progress, stalled, terminate early, errors), the completion of the provisioning processes, and the like. The monitoring module can be configured to determine the status and integrity of the provisioning process based on the status information.


In embodiments, the provisioning server can be configured to utilize the status information determined by the monitoring module to generate and update a log file. The log file can include information such as the identification of the target machine, identification of the provisioning processes performed, and status information such as start time of and time of errors or completion of the provisioning processes.


In embodiments, if the monitoring module has determined the provisioning process has stalled, terminated early or completed normally, the provisioning server can be configured to notify an administrator of the provisioning server, administrator of the target machine, and/or user of the target machine. In particular, the message module can be configured generate and send notification to the administrator or user that the a problem has occurred with the provisioning processes or the provisioning processes is completed. Additionally, the message module can be configured to periodically send notification to the administrator or user.


In embodiments, the message module can be configured to generate and send notifications such as an email message, text message, pop-up interfaces for the visual displays associated with the provisioning server and/or target machine, and the like. The notification can include the identification of the target machine, the identification of the provisioning processes, and status information such as start time of the provisioning processes, time of errors or completion of the provisioning processes, description of the errors if any, and the like.


By actively monitoring the provisioning processes, the provisioning server can continuously determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes. As such, problems with the provisioning processes can be identified as they occur and the administrator can be notified with minimal interaction. Accordingly, the administrator can save time and resources by having access to the current status of provisioning processes and by actively identifying the target machines and processes with problems.



FIG. 1 illustrates an overall provisioning environment 100, in systems and methods for the execution, management, and monitoring of software provisioning, according to exemplary aspects of the present disclosure. Embodiments described herein can be implemented in or supported by the exemplary environment illustrated in FIG. 1. The provisioning environment 100 provides a unified provisioning environment, which comprehensively manages the tasks related to software provisioning.


In particular, the provisioning environment 100 can manage software provisioning using a hierarchy of commands. In exemplary embodiments, the hierarchy can include at least four levels of commands. The lowest level in the hierarchy can comprise distribution commands, which primarily handle base operating system specific tasks of provisioning. The second level can comprise profile commands, which associate a configuration file, such as a kickstart file for Linux or other operating system, with a distribution and optionally allow for customization. The third level comprises system commands, which associate remote systems that are involved with the provisioning of the software. The fourth level comprises repository commands, which address configurations and tasks related to updating the software, remote installation procedures, and optionally customizing the software.


The provisioning environment 100 provides several capabilities and advantages over the known provisioning solutions. For example, the present invention is capable of handling a variety of forms of installations, such as preboot execution environment (“PXE”), virtualization, re-installations, and image installations.


In exemplary aspects, the provisioning environment 100 enables integrating virtualization into a PXE provisioning infrastructure and provides several options to reinstall running machines as well. The provisioning environment 100 can integrate mirroring of package repositories with the provisioning process, so that a provisioning server may serve as a central mirror point of contract for all of an organization's software needs. In aspects, a set of remote mirrored repositories can automatically be used by provisioned systems without additional setup.


Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary aspects the provisioning environment 100. The provisioning environment 100 can be applied to provisioning any form of software, such as Windows systems, UNIX systems, and Linux systems. In the exemplary description that follows, FIG. 1 is presented to explain the provisioning environment 100 for provisioning software, such as Linux, and Linux based software, such as Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux by Red Hat, Inc.


In provisioning of software such as Linux, many system administrators use what is known as the “kickstart” installation method. Kickstart files are files that specify the intended configuration of the software being provisioned. Kickstart files can be kept on a server and can be read by individual computers during the installation. This installation method allows the use a single or relatively few standard kickstart files to install Linux on multiple machines, making it ideal for network and system administrators.


The kickstart file can be a simple text file, containing a list of items, each identified by a keyword. In general, a kickstart file can be edited with any text editor or word processor that can save files as ASCII text. One skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be applied to non-kickstart files in software provisioning. For example, configuration files such as AutoYAST Answer files used in Novell SuSe Linux and Sun Solaris Jumpstart files may also be used by the provisioning environment 100.


Typically, a kickstart file can be copied to the boot disk, or made available on the network. The network-based approach is most commonly used, as most kickstart installations for software provisioning, such as Linux systems, tend to be performed via a network using NFS, FTP, or HTTP on networked computers. Administrators also find it desirable that kickstart installations can be performed using a local CD-ROM, or a local hard drive.


Using kickstart files, a system administrator can create a single file containing the parameters that are needed to complete a typical software installation. For example, kickstart files specify parameters related to: language selection; mouse configuration; keyboard selection; boot loader installation; disk partitioning; network configuration; NIS, LDAP, Kerberos, Hesiod, and Samba authentication; firewall configuration; and package selection.


According to exemplary aspects illustrated in FIG. 1, the provisioning environment 100 can include a provisioning server 102, a code repository 104 which provides access to distributions 106 and 108, a set of installation templates 110, a set of exception plugins 112, a helper client 114 running on target machines 116 in a network 115, a provisioning database 120 which comprises a distribution tree list 122 and template list 124. Each of these components will now be further described.


The provisioning server (from herein referred to as a “cobbler”) 102 is responsible for: serving as a extensible markup language remote procedure call (XMLRPC) handler; linking to or mirroring install distribution trees and a configuration database; hosting kickstart templates; hosting plugins, generating installation images, and the like. The cobbler server 102 can be implemented as software, such as Python code, installed on a boot server machine and provides a command line interface for configuration of the boot server. In addition, the cobbler server 102 can make itself available as a Python application programming interface (API) for use by higher level management software (not shown). The cobbler server 102 supports provisioning via PXE, image (ISO) installation, virualization, re-provisioning. As will be described later, the last two modes are performed with the assistance of a helper client 114.


The code repository 104 is responsible for hosting distributions 106 and 108. The code repository 104 may be implemented using well known components of hardware and software. Additionally, the code repository 104 can be include one or more repositories hosting distributions. The distributions 106 and 108 can include bundles of software that is already compiled and configured. The distributions 106 and 108 may be in the form of either rpm, deb, tgz, msi, exe formats, and the like. For example, as Linux distributions, the distributions 106 and 108 are bundles of software that comprise the Linux kernel, the non-kernel parts of the operating system, and assorted other software. The distributions 106 and 108 can take a variety of forms, from fully-featured desktop and server operating systems to minimal environments.


In exemplary aspects, the installation templates 110 are any data structure or processing element that can be combined with a set of installation configurations and processed to produce a resulting configuration file, such as a kickstart file.


In exemplary aspects, exception plugins 112 is software that interacts with cobbler server 102 to customize the provisioning of software. In general, the exceptions plugins 112 are intended to address infrequent customization needs.


In exemplary aspects, the helper client (known as “koan”, which stands for “kickstart-over-a-network”) 114 can assist the cobbler server 102 during the provisioning processes. The koan 114 can allow for both network provisioning of new virtualized guests and destructive provisioning of any existing system. When invoked, the koan 114 can request profile information from a remote boot server that has been configured with the cobbler server 102. In some aspects, what the koan 114 does with the profile data depends on whether it was invoked with —virt or —replace-self.


In exemplary aspects, the koan 114 can enable replacing running systems as well as installing virtualized profiles. The koan 114 can also be pushed out to systems automatically from the boot server. In some aspects, the koan client 114 is also written in Python code to accommodate a variety of operating systems, machine architectures, etc.


In exemplary aspects, the network 115 can include a number of the target machines 116. The target machines 116 can represent the particular machines to which software provisioning is directed. The target machines 116 may represent a wide variety of computing devices, such as personal computers, servers, laptop computers, personal mobile devices, and the like. In some aspects, the target machines 116 can represent distributed computing environments such as cloud computing environments. Although FIG. 1 shows several of the target machines 116, the provisioning environment 100 can be capable of managing a wide range environments, such as datacenters with thousands of machines or server pools with just a few machines. Additionally, the cobbler server 102 can be connected to multiple networks 115.


In exemplary aspects, the provisioning database 120 can serve as a data storage location for holding data used by the cobbler server 102. For example, as shown, the provisioning database 120 can comprise the distribution tree list 122 and the template list 124. The distribution tree list 122 can provide an inventory of the distributions 106 and 108 that are hosted or mirrored by the cobbler server 102. The template list 124 can provide an inventory of the templates 110 that are hosted by the cobbler server 102.


As noted above, the cobbler server 102 can manage provisioning using a hierarchical concept of distribution commands, profile commands, system commands, and repository commands. This framework enables the cobbler server 102 to abstract the differences between multiple provisioning types (installation, reinstallation, and virtualization) and allows installation of all three from a common platform. This hierarchy of commands also permits the cobbler server 102 to integrate software repositories 126 with the provisioning process, thus allowing systems to be configured as a mirror for software updates and third party content as well as distribution content.


Distributions can contain information about base operating system tasks, such as what kernel and initial ramdisk (“initrd”) are used in the provisioning, along with other information, such as required kernel parameters. Profiles associate one of the distributions 106 and 108 with a kickstart file and optionally customize it further, for example, using plugins 112. Systems commands associate a hostname, IP, or MAC with a distribution and optionally customize the profile further. Repositories contain update information, such as yum mirror information that the cobbler server 102 uses to mirror repository 104. The cobbler server 102 can also manage (generate) DHCP configuration files using the templates 110.


In exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can use a provisioning environment that is fully templated, allowing for kickstarts and PXE files to be customized by the user. The cobbler server 102 uses the concept of “profiles” as an intermediate step between the operating system and the installed system. A profile is a description of what a system does rather than the software to be installed. For instance, a profile might describe a virtual web server with X amount of RAM, Y amounts of disk space, running a Linux distribution Z, and with an answer file W.


In exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can provide a command line interface to configure a boot server in which it is installed. For example, the format of the cobbler server 102 commands can be generally in the format of: cobbler command [subcommand] [-arg 1=] [-arg2=]. Thus, a user can specify various aspects of software provisioning via a single interface, such as a command line interface or other known interface. Examples of exemplary cobbler commands can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/763,315 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/763,333, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein, in their entirety, by reference.


According to exemplary aspects, a user can use various commands of the provisioning environment 100 to specify distributions and install trees hosted by the code repository 104, such as a distribution from the distributions 106 or 108. A user can add or import a distribution or import it from installation media or an external network location.


According to exemplary aspects, in order to import a distribution, the cobbler server 102 can auto-add distributions and profiles from remote sources, whether this is an installation media (such as a DVD), an NFS path, or an rsync mirror. When importing a rsync mirror, the cobbler server 102 can try to detect the distribution type and automatically assign kickstarts. By default in some embodiments, the cobbler server can provision by erasing the hard drive, setting up eth0 for DHCP, and using a default password. If this is undesirable, an administrator may edit the kickstart files in /etc/cobbler to do something else or change the kickstart setting after the cobbler server 102 creates the profile.


According to exemplary aspects, a user may map profiles to the distributions and map systems to the profiles using profile commands and systems commands of the provisioning environment 100. A profile associates a distribution to additional specialized options, such as a kickstart automation file. In the cobbler server 102, profiles are the unit of provisioning and at least one profile exists for every distribution to be provisioned. A profile might represent, for instance, a web server or desktop configuration.


According to exemplary aspects, a user can map systems to profiles using system commands. Systems commands can assign a piece of hardware with cobbler server 102 to a profile. Systems can be defined by hostname, Internet Protocol (IP) address, or MAC address. When available, use of the MAC address to assign systems can be preferred.


According to exemplary aspects, the user can map repositories and profiles using repository commands. Repository commands can address configurations and tasks related to updating the software, remote installation procedures, and optionally customizing the software. These repository commands can also specify mirroring of the provisioned software to remote servers. Repository mirroring can allow the cobbler server 102 to mirror not only install the trees 106 and 108, but also optional packages, third party content, and updates. Mirroring can be useful for faster, more up-to-date installations and faster updates, or providing software on restricted networks. The cobbler server 102 can also include other administrative features, such as allowing the user to view their provisioning configuration or information tracking the status of a requested software installation.


According to exemplary aspects, a user can utilize commands to create a provisioning infrastructure from a distribution mirror. Then a default PXE configuration is created, so that by default systems will PXE boot into a fully automated install process for that distribution. The distribution mirror can be a network rsync mirror or a mounted DVD location.


According to exemplary aspects, the administrator uses a local kernel and initrd file (already downloaded), and shows how profiles would be created using two different kickstarts—one for a web server configuration and one for a database server. Then, a machine can be assigned to each profile.


According to exemplary aspects, a repo mirror can be set up for two repositories, and create a profile that will auto install those repository configurations on provisioned systems using that profile.


According to exemplary aspects, in addition to normal provisioning, the cobbler server 102 can support yet another option, called “enchant”. Enchant takes a configuration that has already been defined and applies it to a remote system that might not have the remote helper program installed. Users might want to use this command to replace a server that is being repurposed, or when no PXE environment can be created. Thus, the enchant option allows the remote the koan client 114 to be executed remotely from the cobbler server 102.


According to aspects, if the cobbler server 102 is configured to mirror certain repositories, the cobbler server 102 can then be used to associate profiles with those repositories. Systems installed under those profiles can be auto configured to use these repository mirrors in commands and, if supported, these repositories can be leveraged. This can be useful for a large install base, fast installation and upgrades for systems are desired, or software not in a standard repository exists and provisioned systems are desired to know about that repository.


According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 may also keep track of the status of kickstarting machines. For example, the “cobbler status” will show when the cobbler server 102 thinks a machine started kickstarting and when it last requested a file. This can be a desirable way to track machines that may have gone inactive during kickstarts. The cobbler server 102 can also make a special request in the post section of the kickstart to signal when a machine is finished kickstarting.


According to exemplary aspects, for certain commands, the cobbler server 102 will create new virtualized guests on a machine in accordance to the orders from the cobbler server 102. Once finished, an administrator may use additional commands on the guest or other operations. The cobbler server 102 can automatically name domains based on their MAC addresses. For re-kickstarting, the cobbler server 102 can reprovision the system, deleting any current data and replacing it with the results of a network install.


According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can configure boot methods for the provisioning requested by the user. For example, the cobbler server 102 can configure a PXE environment, such as a network card BIOS. Alternatively, the cobbler server 102 can compile and configure information for koan client 104. The cobbler server 102 can also optionally configured DHCP and DNS configuration information.


According to exemplary aspects, the cobbler server 102 can serve the request of the koan client 114. The koan client 114 can acknowledge the service of information of the cobbler server 102 and then can initiate installation of the software being provisioned. Additionally the koan client 114 can either install the requested software, e.g., replace the existing operating system, or install a virtual machine.



FIG. 2 illustrates aspects of the provisioning environment 100 that allows for monitoring of software provisioning processes occurring on a target machine 116 in the network 115, according to various embodiments. In embodiments as shown, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to include a monitoring module 202 and a message module 204. The monitoring module 202 can be configured to monitor software provisioning processes being performed on the target machine 116 and to determine the status and integrity of the software provisioning processes. The message module 204 can be configured to send notification of the status and integrity of the provisioning processes to an administrator or user of the software provisioning environment 100.


In embodiments, the cobbler server 102, including the monitoring module 202 and the message module 204, can be configured to perform provisioning process as described above. The provisioning processes can be instantiated under the direction of the cobbler server 102, or under the direction of the koan client 114 or target machine 116. To track and determine the software provisioning processes, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to maintain an inventory 206 which can include a list of target machines, a list of provisioning processes performed, completed, and to be performed on each target machine, and specifications of the provisioning process (type of process, start time of process, and software to be provisioned).


In embodiments, to monitor the software provisioning processes, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to receive status messages 210 from the target machines 116 on which provisioning process are being performed. For example, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to receive the status messages 210 from the koan client 114 assisting the target machine 116 during the software provisioning. Additionally, if the koan client 114 is not associated with the target machine 116, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to receive the status messages 210 from the target machine 116 or other other software instantiated (operating systems, installation programs, and the like) on the target machine 116, directly. Once a provisioning process has begun, the koan client 114 or the target machine 116 can be configured to send the status messages 210 at regular intervals during the provisioning process until the processes end or terminates. Likewise, the koan client 114 or the target machine 116 can be configured to send the status messages 210 when particular events are reached or when every event occurs during provisioning process (particular portion completed, particular percentage completed, errors or problems in the provisioning, provisioning completed or terminated).


In embodiments, the monitoring module 202 can be implemented as a portion of the code for the cobbler server 102. Likewise the monitoring module 202 can be implemented as a separate software tool accessible by the cobbler server 102. The monitoring module 202 can be written in a variety of programming languages, such as JAVA, C++, Python code, and the like to accommodate a variety of operating systems, machine architectures, etc. Additionally, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to include the appropriate application programming interfaces (“APIs”) to communicate with and cooperate with other components of the cobbler server 102 and the koan clients 114 and target machines 116.


In embodiments, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to receive the status messages 210 from the koan client 114 or the target machine 116 which includes status information. The status information can include the progress of the provisioning processes (amount of the processes completed, events occurring during the provisioning process, portions of the processes complete), the integrity of the processes (still in progress, stalled, terminate early, errors), details of any errors, the completion of the provisioning processes, and the like.


In embodiments, once the status messages 210 are received, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to determine the status and integrity of the software provisioning processes based on the status information. To determine the status, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to parse the status message 210 to extract the status information to determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes. For example, the monitoring module 202 can examine the status message 210 to determine the progress of the provisioning process, whether the process has stalled or terminated, details of errors, or whether the the provisioning processes have completed.


Additionally, in embodiments, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to compute a likely status and integrity of the provisioning processes. In particular, the monitoring module 202 can be configured to contain logic to interpolate a likely status and integrity. For example, the monitoring module 202 can examine the start time and details of the provisioning processes. If the provisioning processes has been running for a period of time longer than expected, the monitoring module 202 can interpolate that the provisioning processes may be experiencing problems. Likewise, the monitoring module 202 can interpolate the amount of the process completed by comparing the details for the provisioning process to the amount of the processes completed from the status messages 210.


In embodiments, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to utilize the status, determined by the monitoring module 202 from the status messages 210, to generate and update a log 212. In particular, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to generate the log 212 once monitoring begins and update the log 212 each time the monitoring module 202 receives a status message 210 from the target machine 116. The log 212 can include information such as the identification of the target machine, identification of the provisioning processes performed, status information such as start time of and time of errors or completion of the provisioning processes, and details of any errors in the provisioning processes. Additionally, the log 212 can be linked to the inventory 206. The cobbler server 102 can determine the status of the provisioning processes by examining the log 212.


In embodiments, if the monitoring module 202 has determined the provisioning process has stalled, terminated early or completed normally, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to notify, via the message module 204, an administrator 216 of the provisioning server, administrator of the target machine, and/or user of the target machine. In embodiments, the message module 204 can be configured generate and send notification 214 to the administrator 216 and/or user that the a problem has occurred with the provisioning processes or the provisioning processes is completed. Additionally, the message module 204 can be configured to periodically send notification to the administrator 216 and/or user in order to provide a update of the status during the provisioning processes. Additionally, the message module 204 can be configured to send notification on demand to the administrator 216 and/or user in order to provide a update of the status during the provisioning processes. To determine the status for the notification, the cobbler server 102 can be configured to examine the log 212.


In embodiments, in order to notify the administrator 216 and/or the user, the message module 204 can be configured to generate and send the notification 214 in a variety of formats such as an email message, text message, pop-up interfaces for the visual displays associated with the cobbler server 102, the koan client 114, and/or target machine 116, and the like. The notification 214 can include the identification of the target machine, the identification of the provisioning processes, and status information such as start time of the provisioning processes, time of errors or completion of the provisioning processes, description of the errors if any, and the like.


In embodiments, the message module 204 can be implemented as a portion of the code for the cobbler server 102. Likewise, the message module 204 can be implemented as a separate software tool accessible by the cobbler server 102. The message module 204 can be written in a variety of programming languages, such as JAVA, C++, Python code, and the like to accommodate a variety of operating systems, machine architectures, etc. Additionally, the m message module 204 can be configured to include the appropriate APIs to communicate with and cooperate with other components of the cobbler server 102.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary diagram of hardware and other resources that can be incorporated in the cobbler server 102 configured to communicate with the network 115 and the target machines 116 in network 115, according to embodiments. In embodiments as shown, the cobbler server 102 can comprise a processor 300 communicating with memory 302, such as electronic random access memory, operating under control of or in conjunction with operating system 306. Operating system 306 can be, for example, a distribution of the Linux™ operating system, Unix™ the operating system, or other open-source or proprietary operating system or platform. Processor 300 also communicates with the provisioning database 120, such as a database stored on a local hard drive. While illustrated as a local database in the cobbler server 102, the provisioning database 120 can be separate from the cobbler server 102 and the cobbler server 102 can be configured to communicate with the remote provisioning database 120.


Processor 300 further communicates with network interface 304, such as an Ethernet or wireless data connection, which in turn communicates with one or more networks 115, such as the Internet or other public or private networks. Processor 300 also communicates with the provisioning database 120, the monitor module 202, and the message module 204, to execute control logic and perform the software provisioning processes and monitoring described above. Other configurations of the cobbler server 102, associated network connections, and other hardware and software resources are possible.


While FIG. 3 illustrates the cobbler server 102 as a standalone system comprising a combination of hardware and software, the cobbler server 102 can also be implemented as a software application or program capable of being executed by a convention computer platform. Likewise, the cobbler server 102 can also be implemented as a software module or program module capable of being incorporated in other software applications and programs. In either case, the cobbler server 102 can be implemented in any type of conventional proprietary or open-source computer language.



FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of overall monitoring of provisioning processes in the provisioning environment 100, according to embodiments of the present teachings. In 402, the process can begin. In 404, the cobbler server 102 can determine software provisioning processes being performed on a target machine. For example, the cobbler server 102 can search the inventory 206 to locate provisioning processes that may need monitoring.


In 406, the cobbler server 102 can receive status messages 210 from the target machine 116. For example, the status messages 210 can include status information such as the progress of the provisioning processes (amount of the processes completed, events occurring during the provisioning process, portions of the processes complete), the integrity of the processes (still in progress, stalled, terminate early, errors), details of any errors, the completion of the provisioning processes, and the like. The koan client 114 or the target machine 116 can send the status messages 210 at regular intervals during the provisioning process until the processes end or terminates. Likewise, the koan client 114 or the target machine 116 can send the status messages 210 when particular events are reached or when every event occurs during provisioning process (particular portion completed, particular percentage completed, errors or problems in the provisioning, provisioning completed or terminated).


Once received, in 408, the cobbler server 102 can determine the status of the software provisioning processes based on the status information. For example, the monitoring module 202 can parse the status messages to determine the status and integrity of the provisioning processes. Additionally, the monitoring module 202 can compute a likely status and integrity of the provisioning processes from the status messages.


Then, in 410, the cobbler server 102 can provide notification of the status to an administrator and/or user if a problem occurs and/or provide notification of the status. For example, the message module 204 can generate and send notification to the administrator and/or user that the a problem has occurred with the provisioning processes or the provisioning processes is completed. Additionally, the message module 204 can periodically send notification to the administrator and/or user in order to provide a update of the status during the provisioning processes. Additionally, the message module 204 can send notification on demand to the administrator and/or user in order to provide a update of the status during the provisioning processes.


Then, in 412, the cobbler server 102 can update a log based on the status information. In 414, the cobbler server 102 can continue to receive the status messages 210 from the target machine 116 to determine the status. In 416, the process can end, but the process can return to any point and repeat.


While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments without departing from the true spirit and scope. The terms and descriptions used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. In particular, although the method has been described by examples, the steps of the method may be performed in a different order than illustrated or simultaneously. Those skilled in the art will recognize that these and other variations are possible within the spirit and scope as defined in the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: providing configuration information from a provisioning server over a network to a plurality of virtual machines at one or more target machines, wherein the configuration information comprises a task for a provisioning process that provisions software on the plurality of virtual machines;causing the task from the configuration information to be performed during the provisioning process for a virtual machine among the plurality of virtual machines;receiving a status message at the provisioning server from the virtual machine over the network, wherein the status message indicates an occurrence of an event within the virtual machine during the provisioning process, wherein the event comprises an error that causes the provisioning process to stall or terminate before completion of the provisioning process, and wherein the status message comprises details of the error;parsing, by a processor at the provisioning server, the details of the error to extract a status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine, wherein the status indicates the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine; andgenerating a notification message to notify a user of the status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine, wherein the notification message is generated at determined intervals during the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
  • 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising computing a possible status from status information of the virtual machine.
  • 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising transmitting the notification message to the user.
  • 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the notification message is generated in response to the status indicating the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
  • 5. A system comprising: a network interface to a network; anda processor at a provisioning server to communicate with the network interface to: provide configuration information from the provisioning server over the network to a plurality of virtual machines at one or more target machines, wherein the configuration information comprises a task for a provisioning process that provisions software on the plurality of virtual machines,cause the task from the configuration information to be performed during the provisioning process for a virtual machine among the plurality of virtual machines,receive a status message from the virtual machine over the network via the network interface, wherein the status message indicates an occurrence of an event within the virtual machine during the provisioning process, wherein the event comprises an error that causes the provisioning process to stall or terminate before completion of the provisioning process, and wherein the status message comprises details of the error,parse the details of the error to extract a status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine, wherein the status indicates the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine, andgenerate a notification message to notify a user of the status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine wherein the notification message is generated at determined intervals during the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the processor is further to compute a possible status from status information of the virtual machine.
  • 7. The system of claim 5 wherein the processor is further to transmit the notification message to the user.
  • 8. The system of claim 5, wherein the notification message is generated in response to the status indicating the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
  • 9. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions stored therein that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: provide configuration information from a provisioning server over a network to a plurality of virtual machines at one or more target machines, wherein the configuration information comprises a task for a provisioning process that provisions software on the plurality of virtual machines;cause the task from the configuration information to be performed during the provisioning process for a virtual machine among the plurality of virtual machines;receive a status message at the provisioning server from the virtual machine over the network, wherein the status message indicates an occurrence of an event within the virtual machine during the provisioning process, wherein the event comprises an error that causes the provisioning process to stall or terminate before completion of the provisioning process, and wherein the status message comprises details of the error;parse, by the processor at the provisioning server, the details of the error to extract a status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine, wherein the status indicates the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine; andgenerate a notification message to notify a user of the status of the provisioning process within the virtual machine, wherein the notification message is generated at determined intervals during the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the processor is further to compute a possible status from status information of the virtual machine.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the processor is further to transmit the notification message to the user.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the notification message is generated in response to the status indicating the error in the provisioning process within the virtual machine.
US Referenced Citations (266)
Number Name Date Kind
5787246 Lichtman et al. Jul 1998 A
5835719 Gibson et al. Nov 1998 A
5948062 Tzelnic et al. Sep 1999 A
6105100 Dean et al. Aug 2000 A
6212585 Chrabaszcz Apr 2001 B1
6243747 Lewis et al. Jun 2001 B1
6272536 van Hoff et al. Aug 2001 B1
6381742 Forbes et al. Apr 2002 B2
6397244 Morimoto et al. May 2002 B1
6415289 Williams et al. Jul 2002 B1
6438711 Woodruff Aug 2002 B2
6516427 Keyes et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526442 Stupek et al. Feb 2003 B1
6550021 Dalphy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557169 Erpeldinger Apr 2003 B1
6594664 Estrada et al. Jul 2003 B1
6625742 Owhadi et al. Sep 2003 B1
6686838 Rezvani et al. Feb 2004 B1
6751659 Fenger et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757837 Platt et al. Jun 2004 B1
6769022 DeKoning et al. Jul 2004 B1
6779004 Zintel Aug 2004 B1
6792460 Oulu et al. Sep 2004 B2
6802054 Faraj Oct 2004 B2
6845464 Gold Jan 2005 B2
6865737 Lucas et al. Mar 2005 B1
6915278 Ferrante et al. Jul 2005 B1
6947939 Fujibayashi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6986033 Miyamoto et al. Jan 2006 B2
7013461 Hellerstein et al. Mar 2006 B2
7051101 Dubrovsky et al. May 2006 B1
7107330 Hamilton et al. Sep 2006 B1
7133822 Jacobson Nov 2006 B1
7165109 Chiloyan et al. Jan 2007 B2
7185071 Berg et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200845 Morrison et al. Apr 2007 B2
7260818 Iterum et al. Aug 2007 B1
7340637 Nagoya Mar 2008 B2
7350112 Fox et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356679 Le et al. Apr 2008 B1
7395322 Harvey et al. Jul 2008 B2
7487494 Chan et al. Feb 2009 B2
7506040 Rabe et al. Mar 2009 B1
7506151 Miyamoto et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509416 Edwardson et al. Mar 2009 B1
7516218 Besson Apr 2009 B2
7519691 Nichols et al. Apr 2009 B2
7574481 Moore et al. Aug 2009 B2
7577722 Khandekar et al. Aug 2009 B1
7600005 Jamkhedkar et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606868 Le et al. Oct 2009 B1
7631168 Muellers Dec 2009 B1
7640325 DeKoning et al. Dec 2009 B1
7681080 Abali et al. Mar 2010 B2
7716316 Nichols et al. May 2010 B2
7734717 Saarimaki et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747730 Harlow Jun 2010 B1
7818721 Sundararajan et al. Oct 2010 B2
7827261 Griswold et al. Nov 2010 B1
7831997 Eldar et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873878 Belluomini et al. Jan 2011 B2
7891012 Kiel et al. Feb 2011 B1
7937437 Fujii May 2011 B2
7945897 Cook May 2011 B1
7996648 England et al. Aug 2011 B2
8065676 Sahai et al. Nov 2011 B1
8074201 Ghercioiu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8141090 Graupner et al. Mar 2012 B1
8171485 Muller May 2012 B2
8181174 Liu May 2012 B2
8230059 Santos et al. Jul 2012 B1
8255650 Gruttadauria et al. Aug 2012 B1
8949426 Morgan Feb 2015 B2
20020029326 Reuter et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035604 Cohen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020062259 Katz et al. May 2002 A1
20020069213 Moslander et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078186 Engel et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086688 Kang Jul 2002 A1
20020112171 Ginter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138567 Ogawa Sep 2002 A1
20020162028 Kennedy Oct 2002 A1
20030005097 Barnard et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055919 Fong et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069884 Nair et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069946 Nair et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070110 Aija et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074549 Paul et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097422 Richards et al. May 2003 A1
20030110173 Marsland Jun 2003 A1
20030110248 Ritche Jun 2003 A1
20030119480 Mohammed Jun 2003 A1
20030126585 Parry Jul 2003 A1
20030160823 Stannard Aug 2003 A1
20030195921 Becker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212992 Ronning et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20040006616 Quinn et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015831 Bowhill Jan 2004 A1
20040015957 Zara et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019876 Dravida et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024984 Lanzatella et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044643 deVries et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044998 Wildhagen et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054789 Breh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059703 Chappell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064501 Jan et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040128375 Rockwell Jul 2004 A1
20040143664 Usa et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153703 Vigue et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167975 Hwang et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040193953 Callahan et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210893 Chamberlain et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215755 O'Neill Oct 2004 A1
20040215768 Oulu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040223469 Bahl et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040250249 Fukunari Dec 2004 A1
20050028025 Zalewski et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044541 Parthasarathy et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044546 Niebling et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050175 Fong et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050086640 Kolehmainen Apr 2005 A1
20050114474 Anderson et al. May 2005 A1
20050114502 Raden May 2005 A1
20050125513 Sin-Ling Lam et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125525 Zhou et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050177829 Vishwanath Aug 2005 A1
20050182796 Chu et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198629 Vishwanath Sep 2005 A1
20050223374 Wishart et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050273779 Cheng et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010440 Anderson et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025985 Vinberg et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041767 Maxwell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041881 Adkasthala Feb 2006 A1
20060059493 Liesen Mar 2006 A1
20060080659 Ganji Apr 2006 A1
20060095230 Grier et al. May 2006 A1
20060095702 Hickman et al. May 2006 A1
20060101451 Fong May 2006 A1
20060143359 Dostert Jun 2006 A1
20060143608 Dostert Jun 2006 A1
20060146991 Thompson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155735 Traut et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155857 Feenan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173912 Lindvall et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060174018 Zhu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190575 Harvey et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190773 Rao et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200658 Penkethman Sep 2006 A1
20060215575 Horton et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218544 Chakraborty et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218547 Purkeypile et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230165 Zimmer et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060236228 Michelstein et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060282479 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282567 Bhesania Dec 2006 A1
20070011300 Hollebeek Jan 2007 A1
20070015538 Wang Jan 2007 A1
20070053513 Hoffberg Mar 2007 A1
20070067419 Bennett Mar 2007 A1
20070101118 Raghunath et al. May 2007 A1
20070108627 Kozaka et al. May 2007 A1
20070118654 Jamkhedkar et al. May 2007 A1
20070159650 Takamatsu et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168721 Luiro et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070169079 Keller et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070169093 Logan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070192158 Kim Aug 2007 A1
20070198755 Honda Aug 2007 A1
20070204338 Aiello et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226810 Hotti Sep 2007 A1
20070244996 Ahmed et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245332 Tal et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250672 Stroberger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250813 Sanghvi Oct 2007 A1
20070276905 Durand et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288612 Hall Dec 2007 A1
20070294314 Padovano et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294376 Ayachitula et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299951 Krithivas Dec 2007 A1
20080004904 Tran Jan 2008 A1
20080022271 D'Angelo et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028048 Shekar CS et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080034364 Lam et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040452 Rao et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046708 Fitzgerald et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052384 Marl et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059959 Chen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077605 Vasu Mar 2008 A1
20080082977 Araujo et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086728 Lam et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080104393 Glasser et al. May 2008 A1
20080109876 Hitomi et al. May 2008 A1
20080130639 Costa-Requena et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080178144 Bazigos et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184024 Nicklaus Jul 2008 A1
20080189693 Pathak Aug 2008 A1
20080196043 Feinleib et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201709 Hodges Aug 2008 A1
20080209016 Karve et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080235266 Huang et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235361 Crosbie et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080244325 Tyulenev Oct 2008 A1
20080263258 Allwell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270674 Ginzton Oct 2008 A1
20080276262 Munshi Nov 2008 A1
20080294777 Karve et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080301231 Mehta et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301666 Gordon et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080307259 Vasudevan Dec 2008 A1
20080313716 Park Dec 2008 A1
20080320110 Pathak Dec 2008 A1
20090007091 Appiah et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024994 Kannan Jan 2009 A1
20090031307 Chodroff et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037551 Gupta Feb 2009 A1
20090044187 Smith Feb 2009 A1
20090055901 Kumar et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090064086 Faus et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090064132 Suchy et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070462 Chong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083734 Hotra Mar 2009 A1
20090089567 Boland et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090089852 Randolph et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103722 Anderson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106291 Ku et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090129597 Zimmer et al. May 2009 A1
20090132682 Counterman May 2009 A1
20090132710 Pelley May 2009 A1
20090158148 Vellanki et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158272 El-Assir et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164522 Fahey Jun 2009 A1
20090165099 Eldar et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172430 Takenouchi Jul 2009 A1
20090210869 Gebhart et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217244 Bozak et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217255 Troan Aug 2009 A1
20090222805 Faus et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240835 Adelman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241190 Todd Sep 2009 A1
20090249488 Robinson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259665 Howe et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265707 Goodman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265756 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090282404 Khandekar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090285199 Strahs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090300164 Boggs et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300593 Faus et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300601 Faus et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319848 Thaper Dec 2009 A1
20100023740 Moon et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100049736 Rolls et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100088699 Sasaki Apr 2010 A1
20100100876 Glover et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100131948 Ferris May 2010 A1
20100217837 Ansari et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100220584 DeHaan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100223504 DeHaan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100223608 DeHaan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100223609 DeHaan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100306773 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110035733 Horning et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110153697 Nickolov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110170837 Barnes, Jr. Jul 2011 A1
20120131195 Morgan May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 2009058042 May 2009 RU
Non-Patent Literature Citations (66)
Entry
Akhil Sahai Felix Wu, Utility Computing, 2004, pp. 15-25.
Heiko Lugwig, Cremona: An Architecture and Library for Creation and Monitoring of WS-Agreements, 2004, pp. 1-9.
G. Pruett, BladeCenter systems management software, 2005, pp. 963-973.
Michael DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Provisioning Software”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,315, filed Jun. 14, 2007.
Michael DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Provisioning Software”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,333, filed Jun. 14, 2007.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Message-Based Installation Management Using Message Bus”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,077, filed Jun. 30, 2009.
Henson, “Systems and Methods for Integrating Storage Resources from Storage Area Network in Machine Provisioning Platform”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/628,041, filed Nov. 30, 2009.
Henson, “Systems and Methods for Mounting Specified Storage Resources from Storage Area Network in Machine Provisioning Platform”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/627,988, filed Nov. 30, 2009.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Providing Configuration Management Services from a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,941, filed Mar. 31, 2009.
DeHann, “Systems and Methods for Retiring Target Machines by a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,427, filed May 29, 2009.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Centrally Managing Multiple Provisioning Servers”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,193, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Assigning Provisioning Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,646, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Remote Software Provisioning to Machines”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,633, filed Aug. 21, 2008.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Storage Allocation in Provisioning of Virtual Machines”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,178, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Customized Actions Related to Software Provisioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,562, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Automatically Locating a Provisioning Server”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,290, filed Aug. 26, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Managing Access in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/201,832, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Importing Software Distributions in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,631, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Managing Network Connections Associated with Provisioning Objects in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,690, filed Sep. 26, 2008.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Software Provisioning in Multiple Network Configuration Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,194, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Differential Software Provisioning on Virtual Machines Having Different Configurations”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,019, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Automatically Registering New Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/194,754, filed Aug. 20, 2008.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Software Provisioning Machines Having Virutal Storage Resources”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,189, filed Aug. 29, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Managing Network Connections in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,681, filed Sep. 26, 2008.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Providing a Rescue Environment in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,007, filed Nov. 25, 2008.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Monitoring Hardware Resources in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,056, filed Nov. 28, 2008.
DeHaan, “Methods and Systems for Providing Management Services in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/277,518, filed Nov. 25, 2008.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Providing Hardware Updates in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,991, filed Nov. 26, 2008.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Supporting Multiple Name Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,572, filed Nov. 26, 2006.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Secure Gated Filed Deployment Associated with Provisioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,754, filed Feb. 26, 2009.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Integrating Software Provisioning and Configuration Management”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,379, filed Feb. 27, 2009.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Abstracting Software Content Management in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,273, filed Feb. 27, 2009.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Providing a Library of Virtual Images in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/395,351, filed Feb. 27, 2009.
DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Inventorying Un-Provisioned Systems in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/391,588, filed Feb. 24, 2009.
DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Managing Configurations of Storage Devices in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,613, filed Feb. 26, 2009.
DeHaan et al., “Systems and Methods for Collecting and Altering Firmware Configurations of Target Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,319, filed Feb. 26, 2009.
DeHaan et al., “Methods and Systems for Replicating Provisioning Servers in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,508, filed Feb. 25, 2009.
DeHaan, “Systems and Methods for Cloning Target Machines in a Software Provisioning Environment”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,014, filed May 27, 2009.
Doc Searls “Linux for Suits”, 2005, Specialized System Consultants Inc., vol. 2005.
Grosse, “Repository Mirroring”, 1995.
Butt et al., “Automated Installation of Large-Scale Linux Networks”, 2000.
Agarwalla, “Automating Provisioning of Complete Software Stack in a Grid Environment”, 2004.
Anderson at al., “Technologies for Large-Scale Configuration Management”, Dec. 9, 2002.
eBook “Microsoft System Management Server 2003 Administrator's companion”, Microsoft Press, c2004, Ch. 13, Patch Management, pp. 471-507.
HP Storage Essentials SRM 6.0 Installation Guide, Jan. 2008, HP. 1 st ed. Part No. T4283-96113. pp. 1-5, 97-136, 219-228.
HP Storage Essentials SRM 6.0 User Guide. Jan. 2008. HP. 1st ed. Part No. T4238-96114. pp. 1-83.
Michael DeHaan. “Untlied Provisioning”. 2007.
Michael DeHaan. “Provisioning With Cobbler”. 2007.
Tan et al. “A WBEM Basked Disk Array Management Provider”. 2005. IEEE. 2005 International Conference on Cyberworlds.
Lovelace et al. Managing Disk Subsystems using IBM TotalStorage Productivity Center, Sep. 2005. IBM. 2nd ed. SG24-7097-01. pp. 1-42.
Liu, Huan; “Rapid Application Configuration in Amazon Cloud using Configurable Virtual Appliances”, 2011 ACM, SAC'11 Mar. 21-15, 2011, Taiwan, pp. 147-154; <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id+1982185.1982221&coll=DL&dl=GUIDE&CFID=268649706&CFTOKEN=27442775>.
“rBuilder 3.0 and rPath Appliance Platform Provide Revenue Growth and Channel Expansion Opportunities for ISVS”, Feb. 12, 2007 rPath, Inc., www.rpath.com/corp/press-releases/2007-news/25-february-12-2007-rbuilder-30 . . . , 2 pages.
White Paper—“Best Practices for Building Virtual Appliances”, Nov. 15, 2007, rPath, Inc., www.rpath.com, 8 pages. (What was actually uploaded to EFS was a 6-page document; unable to read the copyright info to see if it says 2008 or 2007. Comparing both documents, they look exactly the same.).
Reimer, Darrell, et al., “Opening Black Boxes: Using Semantic Information to Combat Virtual Machine Image Sprawl,” published in VEE'08 Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS international conference on Virtual execution environments, pp. 111-120, ACM New York, NY, USA © 2008, table of contents ISBN:978-1-59593-796-4.
Gerla, Tim, Field Engineer, rPath, Inc. “From Application to Appliance Building Software Appliances with rPath's -Builder,” 15 pages, Apr. 14, 2008.
Healey, Matt; White Paper “Virtualizing Support”, Mar. 2008, IDC, 9 pages. (White Paper—“rPath Versus Other Software Appliance Approaches”, Mar. 2008, rPath, Inc., www.rpath.com, 9 pages.).
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,563 mailed Jun. 18, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,563 mailed Mar. 24, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Aug. 1, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Nov. 22, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed May 24, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Sep. 14, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Mar. 24, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Sep. 30, 2014.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Jan. 20, 2011.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,787 mailed Dec. 4, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100058307 A1 Mar 2010 US