This disclosure relates generally to content monitoring and, more particularly, to monitoring streaming media content.
Streaming enables media content to be delivered to and presented by a wide variety of content presentation devices, such as desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, personal digital assistants, smartphones, etc. Because a significant portion of media content is presented via streaming to such devices, monitoring of streaming media content, like the monitoring of broadcasted media content, can provide valuable information to advertisers, content providers, and the like.
Methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture to monitor streaming media content are disclosed herein. An example method disclosed herein to monitor streaming media content includes decoding a transport stream carrying media content being streamed to a content presentation device to obtain the media content. The example method also includes extracting metering data having a first format from the media content, the metering data identifying at least one of the media content or a source of the media content. The example method further includes transcoding the extracted metering data to form metering data (e.g., metering metadata) having a second format decodable by a meter executed by the content presentation device.
In some examples, the method additionally includes combining extracted metering data or otherwise collected metering data that is dependent on (e.g., that accompanies) the streaming media content (e.g., metering data from a provider of the media content) with metering data to be associated with the streaming media content, but provided independently of the streaming media content (e.g. metering data from an independent metering data source). In some such examples, the extracted metering data is combined with metering data from an independent metering data source, which is then transcoded to form the metering metadata. In some examples, the independent metering data source determines a timestamp from a clock source and determines an identifier for the streaming media content from a data source communicatively coupled to the independent metering data source (e.g., a configuration file). In some examples, the metering data from the independent metering data source and the extracted metering data are redundant, are identical, or are similar. In some examples, the method includes inserting, by the independent metering data source, a tag or other identifying mark within the extracted metering data to identify the independently provided metering data. In some examples, a delimiter (e.g., a text character, such as a “|” character, or some other sign or indicator) is inserted between the extracted metering data and the metering data from the independent metering data source.
In some examples, the method additionally includes encoding the transcoded metering data (e.g., the extracted metering data or the combined metering data after transcoding) into a metadata channel associated with (e.g., that accompanies or flows with) the transport stream, and sending the transport stream and the metadata channel to the content presentation device. In some examples, the method then includes receiving the transport stream and the metadata channel at the content presentation device, detecting the metering data in the metadata channel using the meter executed by the content presentation device, and reporting the metering data to a media monitoring facility.
In some examples, the metadata channel corresponds to at least one of an external metadata channel external to the transport stream carrying the media content, or an internal metadata channel comprising one or more data fields of the transport stream carrying the media content. An example of an external metadata channel includes an M3U file or other data file encoded to contain the metering metadata, and which is associated with the transport stream that is to be sent to the content presentation device.
In some examples, the transport stream corresponds to a Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) 2 transport stream sent according to a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) live streaming protocol. In some examples, the metering data having the first format (which is extracted from the media content decoded from the transport stream) can include an audio watermark that is embedded in an audio portion of the media content. Additionally or alternatively, the metering data having the first format (which is extracted from the media content decoded from the transport stream) can include a video (e.g., image) watermark that is embedded in a video portion of the media content. In some examples, the metering metadata having the second format into which the extracted metering data is transcoded corresponds to metadata represented in a text format, such as a text format for inclusion in an M3U file.
Another example method disclosed herein to monitor streaming media content includes decoding a transport stream carrying media content being streamed to a content presentation device to obtain the media content. The example method also includes extracting metering data from the media content and/or receiving metering data from an independent metering data source, the metering data identifying at least one of the media content or a source of the media content. Additionally, the example method further includes decoding content identifying metadata (e.g., such as electronic guide data, playlist data, etc.) already accompanying the transport stream carrying the media content. The example method further includes verifying the content identifying metadata using the metering data extracted from the media content.
In some examples, the method additionally includes reporting the results of verifying the content identifying metadata using the metering data extracted from the media content to a media monitoring facility to enable validation of content identifying metadata reported separately by a meter executed by the content presentation device. For example, the meter executed by the content presentation device can also detect the content identifying metadata accompanying the transport stream providing the streaming media content to the content presentation device. The meter can then report this content identifying metadata to the media monitoring facility, which validates the accuracy of the content identifying metadata based on the reported results of previously verifying the content identifying metadata using the metering data extracted from the media content. As noted above, in some examples, the metering data that is extracted from the media content decoded from the transport stream can include an audio watermark that is embedded in an audio portion of the media content. Additionally or alternatively, the metering data that is extracted from the media content decoded from the transport stream can include a video (e.g., image) watermark that is embedded in a video portion of the media content. Additionally or alternatively, the method can include reporting metering data received from an independent metering data source.
Yet another example method disclosed herein to monitor streaming media content includes storing media content (which is to be streamed to a content presentation device) in a temporary storage prior to streaming the media content to the content presentation device. The example method also includes retrieving the media content from the temporary storage, and extracting metering data from the media content (e.g., such as audio/video watermark(s) embedded in the media content), the metering data identifying at least one of the media content or a source of the media content. The method can also include combining the extracted metering data with metering data from an independent metering data source. The example method further includes reporting the metering data to a media monitoring facility.
Prior techniques for monitoring broadcast media content can involve extracting metering data, such as audio and/or video watermarks, from a monitored media content presentation. In the context of streaming media content, digital rights management may prevent access to the streamed media content by applications, such as a device meter, other than the media content player(s) employed by the content presentation device. Monitoring of streaming media content in accordance with examples described herein enables a device meter executed by the content presentation device to detect metering metadata identifying the streaming media content that was transcoded from a first format not decodable by the device meter (e.g., such as a first format corresponding to an audio watermark or a video watermark embedded in the media content, which is inaccessible to the device meter due to digital rights management) to a second format that is decodable by the device meter (e.g., such as a second format corresponding to a text format included in an file sent via a metadata channel accompanying the streaming media content.) Additionally or alternatively, monitoring of streaming media content in accordance with examples described herein enables content identifying metadata already accompanying the streaming media content, and decodable by the device meter without transcoding, to be validated using metering data (e.g., such as audio and/or video watermarks) extracted from the media content. While examples disclosed herein are described in the context of monitoring streaming media content, example methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be applied to monitoring non-streaming media content.
Turning to the figures, a block diagram of a first example system 100 for monitoring streaming media content is illustrated in
The content provider(s) 125 of the illustrated example correspond to any one or more content providers capable of providing media content for streaming to the content presentation device 120. The media content provided by the content provider(s) 125 can be any type of media content, such as audio content, video content, multimedia content, etc. Additionally, the media content can correspond to live (e.g., broadcast) media content, stored media content (e.g., on-demand content), etc.
The compression gear 130 employs any appropriate technique(s) to compress and/or otherwise process the received media content into a form suitable for streaming. For example, the compression gear 130 may compress the media content in accordance with MPEG 4 audio/video compression. The segmenter and packager 135 employs any appropriate technique(s) to segment and package the compressed media content into a form suitable for streaming. For example, the segmenter and packager 135 can segment and package the compressed media content into one or more MPEG 2 transport streams for streaming to the content presentation device 120 via the network 150 using HTTP live streaming (HLS) or any other past, present and/or future, streaming protocol. The digital rights manager 140 encrypts and/or otherwise protects, in accordance with any appropriate digital rights management technique and/or protocol, the media content to be streamed. The content streamer 145 employs any appropriate technique(s) to select and stream the media content to a requesting device, such as the content presentation device 120. For example, the content streamer 145 can select media content that has been MPEG 4 compressed, segmented and packaged into one or more MPEG 2 transport streams, and encrypted for digital rights management, and then stream the content to the content presentation device 120 via the network 150 using HLS or any other streaming protocol.
In some examples, the compression gear 130, the segmenter and packager 135 and/or the digital rights manager 140 prepare content for streaming regardless of whether (e.g., prior to) a request is received from the content presentation device 120. In such an example, the content streamer 145 prepares a transport stream for streaming the already-prepared content to the content presentation device 120 when a request is received from the content presentation device 120. In other examples, the compression gear 130, the segmenter and packager 135 and/or the digital rights manager 140 prepare the content for streaming in response to a request received from the content presentation device 120.
The content presentation device 120 of the illustrated example is a computing device that is capable of presenting streaming media content provided by the content streamer 145 via the network 150. The content presentation device 120 may be, for example, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a mobile computing device, a television, a smart phone, a mobile phone, an Apple® iPad®, an Apple® iPhone®, an Apple® iPod®, an Android™ powered computing device, a Palm® webOS® computing device, etc. In some examples, the content presentation device 120 includes one or more executable media players to present the streaming media content provided by the content streamer 145. For examples, the media player(s) available to the content presentation device 120 may be implemented in Adobe® Flash® (e.g., provided in a SWF file), may be implemented in hypertext markup language (HTML) version 5 (HTML5), may be implemented in Google® Chromium®, may be implemented according to the Open Source Media Framework (OSMF), may be implemented according to a device or operating system provider's media player application programming interface (API), may be implemented on a device or operating system provider's media player framework (e.g., the Apple® iOS® MPMoviePlayer software), etc., or any combination thereof. While a single content presentation device 120 is illustrated, any number and/or type(s) of content presentation devices may be included in the system 100.
The network 150 of the illustrated example is the Internet. Additionally or alternatively, any other network(s) linking the content streamer 145, the content presentation device 120, the device meter 110 and/or the media monitoring facility 115 may be used. The network 150 may comprise any number of public and/or private networks using any type(s) of networking protocol(s).
As noted above, media content provided by the content provider(s) 125 may include metering data, such as embedded audio and/or video watermarks, that identifies and/or is otherwise associated with the media content. However, such metering data may not be accessible by and, thus, may not be decodable by a device meter at the content presentation device 120. For example, the media content and, by extension, the audio and/or video watermarks embedded therein may be accessible only to an appropriate media player, and not a device meter or other application, due to the digital rights management techniques employed by the digital rights manager 140. To enable the device meter 120 to have access to and be able to decode metering data identifying and/or otherwise associated with streaming media content provided to the content presentation device 120, the system 100 of the illustrated example includes the server meter 105. In some examples, the server meter 105 is implemented as a plug-in or other application/device associated with or executed by one or more of the compression gear 130, the segmenter and packager 135, the digital rights manager 140 and/or the content streamer 145. In some examples, the server meter 105 is implemented by an apparatus separate from the compression gear 130, the segmenter and packager 135, the digital rights manager 140 and the content streamer 145.
In the illustrated example, the server meter 105 obtains, from the media content, metering data that is in a first format. In some examples the server meter 105 may also collect metering data from one or more independent metering data sources. The metering data from the independent metering data sources may be in the first format or any other format(s). The server meter 105 then transcodes the obtained metering data (e.g., the extracted metering data and/or the metering data from the independent metering data source) to form metering metadata that is in a second format accessible and decodable by the device meter 110. The metering data identifies the media content, identifies a source of the media content, and/or otherwise describes and/or is associated with the media content. For example, the server meter 105 can obtain embedded audio/video watermarks that correspond to metering data having a first format and/or the server meter 105 can obtain metering data from an independent metering data source. Then, the server meter 105 transcodes this metering data into text data, binary data, etc., that corresponds to metering metadata in a second format. The server meter 105 then encodes the transcoded metering metadata (which is in the second format that is decodable by the device meter 110 executed by or otherwise associated with the content presentation device 120) into a metadata channel associated with the transport stream(s) that is(are) to carry the streaming media content to the presentation device 120. In some examples, the server meter 105 is implemented as a plug-in based on a software development kit (SDK) provided by the entity that embedded the audio/video watermarks in the media content. In such examples, the server meter 105 can employ functionality provided by the SDK to extract and decode audio/video watermark(s) embedded in the media content to obtain the payload data carried by the watermark(s). In some examples, in accordance with one or more versions of the ID3 tagging standards, the server meter 105 then inserts the payload data obtained from the watermark(s) as ID3 tag metadata and/or other metadata in the transport stream(s) that is (are) to stream the media content in accordance with the HLS or other appropriate streaming protocol. Another example implementation of the server meter 105 is illustrated in
The server meter 105 can also employ functionality provided by the SDK to collect metering data from an independent metering data source (e.g. such as by receiving data from an internal clock, receiving content identification information from a user input, receiving content identification information from a file, or another source that is independent of the provider of the media content). An example implementation of the server meter 105 that includes an independent metering data source is described in conjunction with
The system 100 also includes the device meter 110 to monitor streaming media content provided to and/or presented by the content presentation device 120. In the illustrated example, the device meter 110 is executed by the content presentation device 120. In some examples, the device meter 110 may be implemented as a plug-in that is connected to a plug-in interface of a media player executed by the content presentation device 120. In some examples, the device meter 110 may be implemented as one or more instructions that are incorporated in a media player executed by the content presentation device 120. In some examples, the device meter 110 may be implemented as an executable application that is downloaded to the content presentation device 120 (e.g., downloaded as an App from the Apple® App Store.) In some examples, the device meter 110 is implemented by an apparatus separate from the content presentation device 120, but that is able to access metadata (e.g., via one or more digital interfaces, data ports, etc., of the content presentation device 120) associated with streaming media content received by the content presentation device 120.
The device meter 110 of the illustrated example decodes metering metadata included in a metadata channel (or channels) associated with (e.g., provided prior to or accompanying and flowing with) the transport channel(s) providing the streaming media content to the content presentation device 120. For example, a metadata channel decoded by the device meter 110 can correspond to an external metadata channel external to the transport stream carrying the media content, or an internal metadata channel comprising one or more data fields of the transport stream carrying the media content. An example external metadata channel includes an M3U file or other text file associated with a transport stream carrying the streaming media content and containing metering metadata transcoded by the server meter 105 into a text or other appropriate data format. In some examples, such as an example employing the HLS protocol, the device meter 110 extracts and decodes ID3 tag(s) that contain the metering metadata. The device meter 110 of the illustrated example stores the decoded metering metadata (as well as any other metering information captured by the device meter, timestamps added by the device meter 110 to the decoded metering metadata and/or the other metering information, etc.) for reporting to the media monitoring facility 115. In the illustrated example, the device meter 110 reports its stored metering metadata (as well as any other metering information, timestamps, etc.) using an HTTP request sent to an HTTP interface of the media monitoring facility 115. An example implementation of the device meter 110 is illustrated in
The media monitoring facility 115 includes an interface to receive reported metering information (e.g., metering metadata) received from the device meter 110 via the network 150. In the illustrated example, the media monitoring facility 115 includes an HTTP interface to receive HTTP requests that include metering information. Alternatively, any other method(s) to receive metering information may be used. In the illustrated example, the media monitoring facility 115 stores and analyzes metering information received from a plurality of different content presentation devices 120. For example, the media monitoring facility 115 may group metering information by content provider 125 (e.g., group all metering data associated with a particular content provider 125). The media monitoring facility 115 may also analyze the metering information to eliminate erroneous information. For example, the media monitoring facility 115 may compare two types of identifying information received for the same media content (e.g., by comparing content identifying metadata already accompanying the streaming media content with metering data and/or metadata determined by the device meter 110 and/or server meter 105) to identify discrepancies, may eliminate metering information containing discrepancies, and/or may mark certain identifying information as erroneous to be excluded from metering information received at a later time. Any other processing of metering information may additionally or alternatively be performed.
In some examples, the reported metering information includes metering data that was obtained by a dependent metering data source and an independent metering data source. Dependent metering data sources include, for example, sources of metering data obtained from, associated with or otherwise dependent on the media content and/or transport stream(s) providing the media content. For example, a dependent metering data source can include metering data extracted from a watermark payload of the streaming media content. In contrast, independent metering data sources include, for example, sources of metering data obtained independently from the media content and/or transport stream(s) providing the media content, but which can nevertheless be descriptive of the media content. For example, an independent metering data source can include redundant metering data, such as metering data that is the same as the metering data obtained from the dependent metering data source, metering data that is similar to the metering data obtained from the dependent metering data source, etc., but that was obtained by an independent metering data source (e.g., such as a source identifier that is stored in a configuration file at the server meter 105). In such examples, the media monitoring facility 115 may utilize the redundant metering data to verify the metering data from the dependent metering data source. Example metadata with redundant metering data obtained from an independent metering data source is described in conjunction with
The media monitoring facility 115 of the illustrated example also analyzes the received metering information reported by the content presentation device(s) 120 to generate reports concerning the presentation of media content. For example, the media monitoring facility 115 may generate reports indicating the number of times that media content was accessed, demographics for users that accessed the media content, interactions of users with the media content (e.g., fast-forwarding, pausing, etc.), the duration of accesses of the media content, etc. The media monitoring facility 115 may, for example, provide a webpage interface through which interested parties can generate custom reports or otherwise access the metering information (e.g., for a fee or part of a subscription service). For example, the media monitoring facility 115 may generate reports for a particular content provider 125, for advertisers that distribute advertisements via the content provider(s) 125, for competitors of the content provider(s) 125, etc. An example implementation of the media monitoring facility 115 is illustrated in
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example server meter 105 of
The example server meter 105 of
Additionally, in some examples, the server meter 105 of
In the illustrated example of
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example device meter 110 of
The example device meter 110 of
In some examples, the device meter 110 may determine metering information in addition to the metering metadata extracted by the metering metadata extractor 305. For example, the device meter 110 may collect other metadata (e.g., such as other content identifying metadata) already accompanying the transport stream(s) providing the streaming media content. Additionally or alternatively, in some examples, the device meter 110 may collect information describing usage of the media player presenting the media content, other usage of the content presentation device 120 while the media content is being presented, etc., or any combination thereof. In such examples, the metering metadata reporter 310 can use one or more of the example mechanisms described above to report this additional metering information to the media monitoring facility 115 along with, or separate from, the metering metadata extracted by the metering metadata extractor 305.
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example media monitoring facility 115 of
A block diagram of a second example system 500 for monitoring streaming media content is illustrated in
Turning to
The server meter 505 of the illustrated example decodes transport stream(s) carrying media content to be streamed to the content presentation device 120, and extracts metering data from the decoded media content. The metering data identifies the media content, identifies a source of the media content, and/or otherwise describes and/or is associated with the media content. For example, the server meter 505 can extract audio and/or video watermarks embedded in the media content. Additionally, the server meter 505 decodes content identifying metadata (e.g., such as electronic guide data, playlist data, etc.) already accompanying the transport stream(s) carrying the media content to be streamed to the content presentation device 120. In some examples, the server meter 505 uses the metering data extracted from the media content to verify the content identifying metadata already accompanying the transport stream(s) carrying the media content. For example, electronic guide data, playlist data, etc., can have errors or be out-of-date. Using the metering data extracted from the media content to verify this content identifying metadata enables the media monitoring facility 515 to know whether the content identifying metadata already accompanying the transport stream(s) carrying the media content is accurate and, thus, can be used for media monitoring purposes. An example implementation of the server meter 505 is illustrated in
The system 500 includes the device meter 510 to monitor streaming media content presented by the content presentation device 120. The device meter 510 of the illustrated example decodes content identifying metadata (e.g., such as electronic guide data, playlist data, etc.) already accompanying the transport stream(s) carrying the media content being streamed to the content presentation device 120. The device meter 510 stores the content identifying metadata (as well as any other metering information captured by the device meter) for reporting to the media monitoring facility 515. In the illustrated example, the device meter 510 reports its stored content identifying metadata (as well as any other metering information) using an HTTP request sent to an HTTP interface of the media monitoring facility 515. An example implementation of the device meter 510 is illustrated in
The media monitoring facility 515 includes an interface to receive reported content identifying metadata received from the device meter 510 via the network 150. The media monitoring facility 515 also includes an interface to receive verification results from the server meter 505 indicating whether the content identifying metadata reported by the device meter 510 is valid (e.g., whether this content identifying metadata is accurate). Assuming the content identifying metadata is valid, the media monitoring facility 515 can store, analyze and generate reports based on the reported content identifying metadata using techniques similar to those employed by the media monitoring facility 115 to process the reported metering metadata. An example implementation of the media monitoring facility 515 is illustrated in
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example server meter 505 of
The example server meter 505 of
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example device meter 510 of
The example device meter 510 of
In some examples, the device meter 510 may determine metering information in addition to the content identifying metadata extracted by the content metadata extractor 705. For example, the device meter 510 may collect information describing usage of the media player presenting the media content, other usage of the content presentation device 120 while the media content is being presented, etc., or any combination thereof. In such examples, the content metadata reporter 710 can use one or more of the example mechanisms described above to report this additional metering information to the media monitoring facility 515 along with, or separate from, the content identifying metadata extracted by the content metadata extractor 705.
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example media monitoring facility 515 of
The example media monitoring facility 515 of
A block diagram of a third example system 900 for monitoring streaming media content is illustrated in
Turning to
In the system 900 of the illustrated example, a copy of media content being streamed to the content presentation device 120 is stored in a temporary content storage 920 for subsequent processing. The temporary content storage 920 can be implemented by any memory or storage device or devices, such as one or more of the mass storage device 3130 and/or the volatile memory 3118 illustrated in
The server meter 905 of the illustrated example extracts metering data from the media content stored in the temporary content storage 920. The metering data identifies the media content, identifies a source of the media content, and/or otherwise describes and/or is associated with the media content. For example, the server meter 905 can extract audio and/or video watermarks embedded in the media content. In the illustrated example, the server meter 905 reports the extracted metering data (as well as any other metering information) using an HTTP request sent to an HTTP interface of the media monitoring facility 915. An example implementation of the server meter 905 is illustrated in
The media monitoring facility 915 includes an interface to receive reported metering metadata received from the server meter 905 via the network 150. The media monitoring facility 515 can store, analyze and generate reports based on the reported metering data using techniques similar to those employed by the media monitoring facility 115 to process the reported metering metadata. An example implementation of the media monitoring facility 915 is illustrated in
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example server meter 905 of
The example server meter 905 of
A block diagram of an example implementation of the example media monitoring facility 915 of
While example manners of implementing the server meters 105, 505 and 905, the device meters 110 and 510, and the media monitoring facilities 115, 515 and 915 of
A block diagram of a fourth example system 1200 for monitoring streaming media content is illustrated in
Turning to
To enable monitoring of media content that is streamed to the content presentation device 120, the system 1200 of the illustrated examples also includes an example metadata inserter 1220 and one or more example transcoders 1225 and/or 1230, in addition to the previously described device meter 110 and media monitoring facility 115. The metadata inserter 1220 may be implemented, for example, as a separate device, or as a plug-in or other application/device associated with or executed by the IRD 210. The transcoders 1225 and/or 1230 may each be implemented, for example, as a separate device, or as a plug-in or other application/device associated with or executed by one or more elements of the content delivery network 1215 (e.g., such as one or more of the compression gear 130, the segmenter and packager 135, the digital rights manager 140 and/or the content streamer 145). In some examples, the metadata inserter 1220 and one or more of the transcoders 1225 and/or 1230 may be integrated into a single device or plug-in, whereas in other examples the metadata inserter 1220 is separate from the transcoders 1225 and 1230.
In the illustrated example, the metadata inserter 1220 is coupled to an interface of the IRD 1210 (e.g., such as a serial digital interface (SDI) or Internet protocol (IP) interface) and decodes of the television transport stream provided by the IRD 1210. The metadata inserter 1220 then extracts audio watermark(s) from the audio portion(s) of the television transport stream and decodes the audio watermark(s) to obtain audio watermark payload data, which in the illustrated example provides the metering information. Additionally or alternatively, in some examples the metadata inserter 1220 extracts video (e.g., image) watermark(s) from the video portion(s) of the television transport stream and decodes the video (e.g., image) watermark(s) to obtain video watermark payload data corresponding to the metering information. In some examples the metadata inserter 1220 may additionally or alternatively obtain metering data from an independent metering data source, such as the independent metering data source described in conjunction with
In the illustrated example, the system 1200 includes one or more of the transcoder 1225 or the transcoder 1230. The transcoders 1225 and 1230 each can take metering metadata inserted by the metadata inserter 1220 into the television transport stream and convert this metadata into a format compatible with streaming by the content delivery network 1215. The transcoders 1225 and 1230 each can then insert this reformatted metadata into certain portion(s) of the streaming content transport stream(s) that are capable of carrying metadata. For example, the transcoders 1225/1230 can decode metering metadata inserted as VBI payload data or as ATSC private information descriptor(s) and convert this metering metadata into ID3 tag metadata for insertion in the transport stream(s) that is (are) to stream the media content in accordance with the HLS or other appropriate streaming protocol. In some examples, the transcoders 1225/1230 encrypt the transcoded metering metadata prior to insertion in the transport stream(s) that is (are) to stream the media content (e.g., to protect privacy). Such encryption can prevent the metering metadata from being observable by applications at the content presentation device 120 other than the device meter 110. Additionally or alternatively, such encryption can be used to prevent the device meter 110 from extracting and/or decoding the metering metadata unless the device meter 110 has been provisioned (e.g., enabled) by the media monitoring facility 115.
In the illustrated example, the difference between the transcoder 1225 and the transcoder 1230 concerns the location and integration into the system 1200. For example, the transcoder 1225 performs its transcoding functions on the input to the content delivery network 1215 and, thus, may be implemented as a device separate from the CDN 1215 and/or may be integrated with or separate from the metadata inserter 1220. In contrast, the transcoder 1230 operates on transport stream(s) within the CDN 1215 (e.g., similar to the server meter 105) and, thus, may be implemented as a plug-in and/or application/device associated with or executed by one or more of the elements included in the CDN 1215.
A potential advantage of the example system 1200 is that different vendors can provide metadata inserters 1220 and transcoders 1225/1230, with their interfaces being specified by established industry standards (e.g., such as established SCTE or ATSC standards).
While an example manner of implementing the system 1200 has been illustrated in
Flowcharts representative of example machine readable instructions that may be executed to implement the example systems 100, 500, 900, 1200, 2300 and/or 2800, the example server meters 105, 505 and/or 905, the example device meters 110 and/or 510, the example media monitoring facilities 115, 515, 915 and/or 2815, the example transport stream decoder 205, the metering data extractor 210, the example metering data transcoder 215, the example metering metadata encryptor 220, the example transport stream encoder 225, the example metering metadata extractor 305, the example metering metadata reporter 310, the example metering metadata collector 405, the example report generator 410, the example content metadata extractor 605, the example metadata verifier 610, the example content metadata extractor 705, the example content metadata reporter 710, the example content metadata collector 805, the example content metadata validator 810, the example report generator 815, the example media content retriever 1005, the example metering data reporter 1010, the example metering data collector 1105 the example report generator 1110, the example metadata inserter 1220, the example transcoders 1225 and/1230, the example independent metering data source 2320, the example combiner 2330, the example clock 2410, the example data source(s) 2420, and/or the secondary content presenter 2825 are shown in
As mentioned above, the example processes of
Example machine readable instructions 1300 that may be executed to implement the first example server meter 105 of
In some examples, block 1315 may be modified and/or replaced with one or more blocks to utilize metering data from an independent metering data source, as described below in conjunction with
Example machine readable instructions 1400 that may be executed to implement the first example device meter 110 of
Example machine readable instructions 1500 that may be executed to implement the first example media monitoring facility 115 of
Example machine readable instructions 1600 that may be executed to implement the second example server meter 505 of
In some examples, block 1615 may be modified and/or replaced with one or more blocks to utilize metering data from an independent metering data source, as described below in conjunction with
Example machine readable instructions 1700 that may be executed to implement the second example device meter 510 of
Example machine readable instructions 1800 that may be executed to implement the second example media monitoring facility 515 of
Example machine readable instructions 1900 that may be executed to implement the third example server meter 905 of
In some examples, block 1915 may be modified and/or replaced with one or more blocks to utilize metering data from an independent metering data source, as described below in conjunction with
Example machine readable instructions 2000 that may be executed to implement the third example media monitoring facility 915 of
Example machine readable instructions 2100 that may be executed to implement the example metadata inserter 1220 of
In some examples, block 2115 may be modified and/or replaced with one or more blocks to utilize metering data from an independent metering data source. Such an example is described in conjunction with
Example machine readable instructions 2200 that may be executed to implement the example transcoders 1225 and/or 1230 of
The dependent metering data source 2310 of the illustrated example receives media content and extracts metering data from the media content. In other words, the metering data collected by the metering data source 2310 is provided by, associated with or otherwise dependent on the media content itself. For example, the dependent metering data source 2310 may extract metering data from an audio and/or video watermark included in the media content, may obtain metering data from a signature generated from the media content, etc.
The example independent metering data source 2320 obtains metering data from sources independent of the content of the media content. For example, the independent metering data source 2320 may obtain a timestamp from a clock, identifying information provided by a user input, identifying information stored in a file, etc. In some examples, the metering data obtained by the independent metering data source 2320 may be redundant, similar or identical in content and/or data type to the data extracted from the dependent metering data source 2310. For example, the metering data from the dependent metering data source 2310 and the metering data from the independent metering data source 2320 may include the same source identifier.
The combiner 2330 of the illustrated example receives first metering data from the dependent metering data source 2310 and second metering data from the independent metering data source 2320 and combines the first and second metering data to generate the combined metering data 2340. In some examples, the combined metering data 2340 contains redundant or partially redundant information as described in conjunction with
A block diagram of an example server meter 2405 that is implemented in accordance with the system 2300 of
The example dependent metering data source 2310 of
The independent metering data source 2320 of the illustrated example obtains metering data from the clock 2410 and the data source(s) 2420. Additionally or alternatively, the independent metering data source 2320 may obtain metering data from any other internal or external sources of metering data that are independent (e.g., separate from) the media content and/or the transport stream(s) providing the media content.
The clock 2410 of the illustrated example is an internal system clock of the server meter 2405 that provides one or more timestamps to the independent metering data source 2320, when requested. The clock 2410 may alternatively be any type of internal clock, external clock, etc. For example, the clock 2410 may be a clock at a content provider and/or the clock 2410 may be an internal clock that is synchronized with a clock of a content provider.
The data source(s) 2420 of the illustrated example provide metering data to the independent metering data source 2320. The data source(s) 2420 provide metering data that is independent of the media content (e.g., is not extracted from the content of the media content). According to the illustrated example, the data source(s) 2420 include a configuration file storing information identifying the source (e.g., the content provider) of the streaming media content. The configuration file is created during setup of the server meter 2405. Additionally or alternatively, the data source(s) 2420 may include any one or more of locally stored data, externally stored data, data available via a network connection, data input by a user of the server meter 2405, etc.
In some examples, the independent metering data source 2320 inserts a tag or other form of identification into the obtained metering data to signify that the metering data was collected by the independent metering data source 2420. For example, the independent metering data source 2320 of
The combiner 2330 of the illustrated example combines the metering data from the dependent metering data source 2310 with the metering data from the independent data provider 2320. For example, the combiner 2330 concatenates the metering data extracted by the dependent metering data source 2310 with the metering data obtained by the independent metering data source 2320 to produce one data string. The combiner inserts a delimiter (e.g. a “|”) or any other character or indicator between the metering data extracted by the dependent metering data source 2310 and the metering data obtained by the independent metering data source 2320. Additionally or alternatively, the combiner 2330 may combine the metering data in any other manner.
To transcode the combined metering data obtained from the dependent metering data source 2310 and the independent metering data source 2320 from a first format to a second format decodable by a device meter, the example server meter 2405 of
While example manners of implementing the system 2300 are described in conjunction with
Example machine readable instructions 2500 that may be executed to implement the example server meter 2405 of
The metering data transcoder 215 of the server meter 2405 transcodes the metering data in the first and/or second format(s) obtained at blocks 2515 and 2520 and combined at block 2525 to form transcoded metering metadata having a third format (e.g., a text, binary or other data format) that is decodable by the device meter 110 (block 2530). The transport stream encoder 225 of the server meter 105 re-encodes the transport stream that is to carry the streaming media content to include the transcoded metering metadata in a metadata channel to be associated with the transport stream (block 2535). The server meter 2405 sends the re-encoded transport stream (and the metadata channel carrying the transcoded metering metadata) to any other downstream processing elements for streaming to the content presentation device 120 (block 2540). Execution of the example machine readable instructions 2500 then ends.
A block diagram of a fifth example system 2800 for monitoring streaming media content is illustrated in
Turning to
The media monitoring facility 2815 includes an interface to receive reported metering information (e.g., metering metadata) received from the device meter 110 via the network 150. In the illustrated example, the media monitoring facility 2815 includes an HTTP interface to receive HTTP requests that include metering information. Additionally or alternatively, any other method(s) to receive metering information may be used. In the illustrated example, the media monitoring facility 2815 receives metering information from the device meter 110, selects secondary content using the received metering information, and sends the selected secondary content to the secondary content presenter 2825. In some examples, the media monitoring facility may select the secondary content from an internal content database. In some examples, the media monitoring facility 2815 may select the secondary content from one/or more external database(s) and/or third party database(s). In such examples, the media monitoring facility 2815 may access the external and/or third party database(s) via a network (e.g. the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), etc.). Other additional or alternative examples of providing secondary media content associated with primary media content that may be employed by the media monitoring facility 2815 are described in, for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0280641 (“METHODS, APPARATUS AND ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE TO PROVIDE SECONDARY CONTENT IN ASSOCIATION WITH PRIMARY BROADCAST MEDIA CONTENT” to Harkness et al.), which was filed on Apr. 30, 2010, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The content presentation device 2820 of the illustrated example is a computing device that is capable of presenting streaming media content provided by the content streamer 145 via the network 150. The content presentation device 2820 may be, for example, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a mobile computing device, a television, a smart phone, a mobile phone, an Apple® iPad®, an Apple® iPhone®, an Apple® iPod®, an Android™ powered computing device, Palm® webOS® computing device, etc. In some examples, the content presentation device 2820 includes one or more executable media players to present the streaming media content provided by the content streamer 145. For examples, the media player(s) available to the content presentation device 120 may be implemented in Adobe® Flash® (e.g., provided in a SWF file), may be implemented in hypertext markup language (HTML) version 5 (HTML5), may be implemented in Google® Chromium®, may be implemented according to the Open Source Media Framework (OSMF), may be implemented according to a device or operating system provider's media player application programming interface (API), may be implemented on a device or operating system provider's media player framework (e.g., the Apple® iOS® MPMoviePlayer software), etc., or any combination thereof. While a single content presentation device 120 is illustrated, any number and/or type(s) of content presentation devices may be included in the system 100.
In the illustrated example, the content presentation device 2820 implements the secondary content presenter 2825. The secondary content presenter 2820 may be as an executable media presenter stored on a computing device that is capable of presenting secondary content provided by the media monitoring facility 2815 via the network 150. In some examples, the secondary content presenter 2825 may be implemented as a plug-in that is connected to a plug-in interface of a media player executed by the content presentation device 2820. In some examples, the secondary content presenter 2825 may be implemented as instructions provided that are incorporated in a media player executed by the content presentation device 2820. In some examples, the secondary content presenter 2825 may be implemented as an executable application that is downloaded to the content presentation device 2820 (e.g., downloaded as an App from the Apple® App Store). For example, the secondary content presenter 2825 may be implemented in Adobe® Flash® (e.g., provided in a SWF file), may be implemented in hypertext markup language (HTML) version 5 (HTML5), may be implemented in Google® Chromium®, may be implemented according to the Open Source Media Framework (OSMF), may be implemented according to a device or operating system provider's media player application programming interface (API), may be implemented on a device or operating system provider's media player framework (e.g., the Apple® iOS® MPMoviePlayer software), etc., or any combination thereof. While a single secondary content presenter 2825 is illustrated, any number and/or type(s) of secondary content presenters associated with the content presentation device 2820 may be included in the system 2800.
Example machine readable instructions 2900 that may be executed to implement the second example media monitoring facility 2815 of
Example machine readable instructions 3000 that may be executed to implement the device meter 110 and secondary content presenter within the content presentation device 2820 of
The system 3100 of the instant example includes a processor 3112 such as a general purpose programmable processor. The processor 3112 includes a local memory 3114, and executes coded instructions 3116 present in the local memory 3114 and/or in another memory device. The processor 3112 may execute, among other things, the machine readable instructions represented in
The processor 3112 is in communication with a main memory including a volatile memory 3118 and a non-volatile memory 3120 via a bus 3122. The volatile memory 3118 may be implemented by Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM) and/or any other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory 3120 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the main memory 3118, 3120 is typically controlled by a memory controller (not shown).
The processing system 3100 also includes an interface circuit 3124. The interface circuit 3124 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB), and/or a third generation input/output (3GIO) interface.
One or more input devices 3126 are connected to the interface circuit 3124. The input device(s) 3126 permit a user to enter data and commands into the processor 3112. The input device(s) can be implemented by, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, an isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.
One or more output devices 3128 are also connected to the interface circuit 3124. The output devices 3128 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a cathode ray tube display (CRT)), by a printer and/or by speakers. The interface circuit 3124, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card.
The interface circuit 3124 also includes a communication device such as a modem or network interface card to facilitate exchange of data with external computers via a network (e.g., an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL), a telephone line, coaxial cable, a cellular telephone system, etc.).
The processing system 3100 also includes one or more mass storage devices 3130 for storing machine readable instructions and data. Examples of such mass storage devices 3130 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks, compact disk drives and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives. In some examples, the mass storage device 3130 may implement the temporary content storage 920. Additionally or alternatively, in some examples the volatile memory 3118 may implement the temporary content storage 920.
The coded instructions 3132 of
As an alternative to implementing the methods and/or apparatus described herein in a system such as the processing system of
Finally, although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the disclosure either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/035,251 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,252,062), titled “Monitoring Streaming Media Content,” which was filed on Sep. 28, 2020, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/922,918 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,791,042), titled “Monitoring Streaming Media Content,” which was filed on Oct. 26, 2015, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/341,646 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,210,208), titled “Monitoring Streaming Media Content,” which was filed on Dec. 30, 2011, and which claims the benefit of and priority from (a) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/499,520, titled “Monitoring Streaming Media Content,” which was filed on Jun. 21, 2011, and (b) U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/568,631, titled “Monitoring Streaming Media Content,” which was filed on Dec. 8, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/035,251, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/922,918, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/341,646, and U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/499,520 and 61/568,631 are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4230990 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4647974 | Butler et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4677466 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4697209 | Kiewit et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4745468 | Von Kohorn | May 1988 | A |
4876592 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4926255 | Von Kohorn | May 1990 | A |
4973952 | Malec et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5003591 | Kauffman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5019899 | Boles et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023929 | Call | Jun 1991 | A |
5034807 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1991 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5081680 | Bennett | Jan 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5227874 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1993 | A |
5249044 | Von Kohorn | Sep 1993 | A |
5283734 | Von Kohorn | Feb 1994 | A |
5331544 | Lu et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5401946 | Weinblatt | Mar 1995 | A |
5425100 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512933 | Wheatley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524195 | Clanton, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543856 | Rosser et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559716 | Gaalswyk | Sep 1996 | A |
5574962 | Fardeau et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579124 | Aijala et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594934 | Lu et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629739 | Dougherty | May 1997 | A |
5659366 | Kerman | Aug 1997 | A |
5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5719634 | Keery et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734413 | Lappington et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740035 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5815671 | Morrison | Sep 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5848155 | Cox | Dec 1998 | A |
5850249 | Massetti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880789 | Inaba | Mar 1999 | A |
5893067 | Bender et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910987 | Ginter et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918223 | Blum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930369 | Cox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933789 | Byun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966120 | Arazi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974299 | Massetti | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987855 | Dey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6034722 | Viney et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049830 | Saib | Apr 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061793 | Tewfik et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088659 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108637 | Blumenau | Aug 2000 | A |
6115654 | Eid et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6154209 | Naughton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6208735 | Cox et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216129 | Eldering | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6282573 | Darago et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286036 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286140 | Ivanyi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298348 | Eldering | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308327 | Liu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310956 | Morito | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327619 | Blumenau | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331876 | Koster et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335736 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363159 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363488 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377993 | Brandt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389055 | August et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400827 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421445 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442285 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6463445 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487564 | Asai et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505160 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512836 | Xie et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512837 | Ahmed | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513014 | Walker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522771 | Rhoads | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6539095 | Rhoads | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546556 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553178 | Abecassis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6611607 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6642966 | Limaye | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647269 | Hendrey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651253 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654480 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665873 | Van Gestel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671732 | Weiner | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675383 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683966 | Tian et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6710815 | Billmaier et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714683 | Tian et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714684 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6750985 | Rhoads | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766523 | Herley | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6795972 | Rovira | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804379 | Rhoads | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829368 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6853634 | Davies et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871323 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873688 | Aarnio | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6941275 | Swierczek | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956575 | Nakazawa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963972 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968315 | Nakisa | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968564 | Srinivasan | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970886 | Conwell et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6996213 | De Jong | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003731 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007166 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7032178 | McKnight et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7050603 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051086 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058697 | Rhoads | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082434 | Gosselin | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7143949 | Hannigan | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158943 | van der Riet | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171018 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174293 | Kenyon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181042 | Tian | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185201 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194752 | Kenyon et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197156 | Levy | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7215280 | Percy et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7221405 | Basson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227972 | Brundage et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254249 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273978 | Uhle | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7317716 | Boni et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328153 | Wells et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346512 | Li-Chun Wang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356700 | Noridomi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363278 | Schmelzer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369678 | Rhoads | May 2008 | B2 |
7421723 | Harkness et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443292 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451317 | Oh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463143 | Forr et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7519658 | Anglin et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7548565 | Sull et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7592908 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7623823 | Zito et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7643090 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7689823 | Shen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712114 | Ramaswamy | May 2010 | B2 |
7761465 | Nonaka et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7802306 | Adams et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7827312 | Ramaswamy et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7895442 | Adams et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7917645 | Ikezoye et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7962934 | Eldering et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8065703 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8103879 | Levy et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8176322 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8179475 | Sandrew | May 2012 | B2 |
8234350 | Gu et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8332326 | Schrempp et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8447828 | Issa | May 2013 | B2 |
8451868 | Johnson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8578272 | Pantos et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8645373 | Knight et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8706685 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8732185 | Lynn et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8819205 | Kodama | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8839338 | Eyer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856869 | Brinskelle | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8990844 | Oh et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9113109 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9197421 | Besehanic | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9209978 | Besehanic | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210208 | Ramaswamy et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9332035 | Ramaswamy et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9515904 | Ramaswamy et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9578289 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9648282 | Petrovic et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9729830 | May, Jr. et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9762965 | Besehanic | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9807137 | Forsman et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9838281 | Besehanic et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10681174 | Besehanic | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10757158 | Truax | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10791042 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11240341 | Besehanic | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11252062 | Ramaswamy | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11296962 | Ramaswamy | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20010018693 | Jain et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023436 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010031066 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044851 | Rothman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044899 | Levy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012443 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016969 | Kimble | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032734 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033842 | Zetts | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042833 | Hendler et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047899 | Son et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052885 | Levy | May 2002 | A1 |
20020053078 | Holtz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056094 | Dureau | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059218 | August et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062382 | Rhoads et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069037 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083324 | Hirari | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091991 | Castro | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108125 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111934 | Narayan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112002 | Abato | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120925 | Logan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124246 | Kaminsky et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126872 | Brunk et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133705 | Tagashira et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138852 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144262 | Plotnick et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144273 | Reto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150247 | Linnartz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157112 | Kuhn | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162118 | Levy et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174425 | Markel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194592 | Tsuchida et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197063 | Cho | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021441 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025832 | Swart et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039465 | Bjorgan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055949 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056010 | Kaars | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079131 | Reefman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088674 | Ullman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093810 | Taniguchi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103645 | Levy et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105870 | Baum | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108200 | Sako | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115598 | Pantoja | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149890 | Shen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177488 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185232 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210821 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212710 | Guy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003394 | Ramaswamy | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009763 | Stone et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019690 | Cardno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025181 | Addington et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037271 | Liscano et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038692 | Muzaffar | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044893 | Alattar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059933 | Levy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064319 | Neuhauser et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073916 | Petrovic et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073951 | Bac et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088347 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088556 | Weirauch | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125125 | Levy | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128514 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137929 | Jones et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146161 | De Jong | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153649 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156489 | Vishik et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199387 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040254887 | Jacoby | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028189 | Heine et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033758 | Baxter | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058319 | Rhands et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086682 | Burges et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120113 | Bunch et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138179 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144004 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152287 | Yokomitsu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177738 | Van Der Veen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188297 | Knight et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192933 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193425 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204379 | Yamamori | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216346 | Kusumoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234774 | Dupree | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060026431 | Campello De Souza | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031297 | Zuidema | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060056625 | Nakabayashi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059277 | Zito et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062426 | Levy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095401 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107195 | Ramaswamy et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107302 | Zdepski | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136564 | Ambrose | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167747 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168613 | Wood et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195614 | Sena et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195886 | Ashley | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212705 | Thommana et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221173 | Duncan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224798 | Klein et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242325 | Ramaswamy et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070005766 | Singhal et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006250 | Croy et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016918 | Alcorn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055987 | Lu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074020 | Nishimura | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083611 | Farago et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110089 | Essafi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112837 | Houh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118375 | Kenyon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118873 | Houh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124771 | Shvadron | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127717 | Herre et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129952 | Kenyon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133223 | Fredley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136753 | Bovenschulte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136777 | Hasek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136782 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149114 | Danilenko | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156726 | Levy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156739 | Black et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157262 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162927 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186228 | Ramaswamy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186288 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198738 | Angiolillo et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201835 | Rhoads | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226760 | Neuhauser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070274523 | Rhoads | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276925 | La Joie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276926 | La Joie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288476 | Flanagan, III et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294057 | Crystal et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294132 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294705 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294706 | Neuhauser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005348 | Kosiba et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021874 | Dahl et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027734 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028223 | Rhoads | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040354 | Ray et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046499 | Cabrera et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059160 | Saunders et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065507 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077956 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082510 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082922 | Biniak et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083003 | Biniak et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104624 | Narasimhan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120661 | Ludvig et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126420 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133223 | Son et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133504 | Messer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134232 | Rhoads | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139182 | Levy et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140573 | Levy et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155602 | Collet et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168503 | Sparrell | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184132 | Zato | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199150 | Candelore | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200999 | Hakansson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209491 | Hasek | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219496 | Tewfik et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219637 | Sandrew | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235077 | Harkness et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235209 | Rathod et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240490 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249961 | Harkness et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263579 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294487 | Nasser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310629 | Van Der Veen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007169 | Headley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015599 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090070408 | White | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083417 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083783 | Park et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086812 | Ducharme | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103887 | Choi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116812 | O'Brien et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119723 | Tinsman | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129588 | Takakusu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129740 | O'Brien et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133093 | Hodge | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150553 | Collart et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157731 | Zigler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158318 | Levy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164378 | West et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164564 | Willis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210892 | Ramaswamy | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228492 | Valdez et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248886 | Tan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259325 | Topchy et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265214 | Jobs et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265278 | Wang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276313 | Wilhelm | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305680 | Swift et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307061 | Monighetti et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307084 | Monighetti et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008586 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100009722 | Levy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023405 | Liu | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027961 | Gentile et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100083299 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088583 | Schachter | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094897 | Sumrall et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107217 | Liu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114983 | Robert et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121936 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135638 | Mio | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158101 | Wu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169904 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172540 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174774 | Kern et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205628 | Davis et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226526 | Modro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241963 | Kulis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246955 | Wright et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251304 | Donoghue et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262711 | Bouazizi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293466 | O'Brien | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306257 | Levy | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318600 | Furbeck | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016231 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029666 | Lopatecki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030031 | Lussier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055314 | Rosenstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058675 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066437 | Luff | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078721 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081965 | Klein et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088053 | Lee | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107369 | O'Brien et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115977 | Simpson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116764 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123062 | Hilu | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138020 | Pantos et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145246 | Prager et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145581 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154185 | Kem et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157475 | Wright et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173200 | Yang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196921 | Sylthe | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197237 | Turner | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225608 | Lopatecki et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231660 | Kanungo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246621 | May, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246623 | Pantos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246885 | Pantos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252118 | Pantos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264530 | Santangelo et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264727 | Keum et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289121 | Pirkner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110320287 | Holt et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321003 | Doig et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011225 | Keum et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023516 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036350 | Kuno et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036538 | Kudelski et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045054 | Main et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047542 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072731 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096546 | Dilley et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124605 | Praden | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137015 | Sun | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143994 | Calcev et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144302 | Campanotti et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166667 | Hall | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120183229 | McDevitt | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209949 | Deliyannis et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222075 | Liu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239809 | Mazumdar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243851 | Koreeda et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120251015 | Lim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254456 | Visharam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265735 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284804 | Lindquist et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308071 | Ramsdell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311126 | Jadallah et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120315011 | Messmer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007298 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007794 | Besehanic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013761 | Grube et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054972 | Thorwirth | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061275 | Seo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066891 | Boldyrev et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067052 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073960 | Eppolito et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091249 | McHugh et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094590 | Laksono et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097285 | van Zwol et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120651 | Perry | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124679 | Harrang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124747 | Harrang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132727 | Petrovic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159388 | Forsman et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166868 | Jamikov et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130202150 | Sinha et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205319 | Sinha et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226942 | Denoual et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231931 | Kulis et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235072 | Longhurst et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247078 | Nikankin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268623 | Besehanic et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268630 | Besehanic et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130276148 | Killian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290508 | Besehanic et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130291001 | Besehanic et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297410 | Oh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130297737 | Wajs et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311776 | Besehanic | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311780 | Besehanic | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318114 | Emerson, III | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140020005 | Amselem et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033036 | Gaur et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140082220 | Ramaswamy et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095662 | Klos et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105392 | Robert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140229629 | Besehanic | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229970 | Besehanic | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244828 | Besehanic | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140298365 | Matsubara et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301386 | Harrenstien et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140336797 | Emerson, III | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150039320 | Neuhauser et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150135206 | Reisman | May 2015 | A1 |
20150135214 | Reisman | May 2015 | A1 |
20150222939 | Gallant et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160043916 | Ramaswamy et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057317 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160127466 | Albrecht et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170041204 | Besehanic et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170142180 | McGowan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180013807 | Forsman et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180352052 | Besehanic | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20200104278 | Kindig et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200304597 | Besehanic | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210014140 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8976601 | Feb 2002 | AU |
9298201 | Apr 2002 | AU |
2003230993 | Nov 2003 | AU |
2006203639 | Aug 2006 | AU |
2012272872 | Aug 2015 | AU |
112901 | Jun 2003 | BR |
309598 | Feb 2005 | BR |
2483104 | Apr 2003 | CA |
1457600 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1592906 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1647160 | Jul 2005 | CN |
101115124 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101198045 | Jun 2008 | CN |
102045312 | May 2011 | CN |
102065339 | May 2011 | CN |
769749 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1176826 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1349370 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1406403 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1307833 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1760612 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1745464 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1853026 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1704695 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1504445 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2166730 | Mar 2010 | EP |
3661114 | Apr 2023 | EP |
2002247610 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003524199 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004320752 | Nov 2004 | JP |
95027349 | Oct 1995 | WO |
97002672 | Jan 1997 | WO |
0004662 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0019699 | Apr 2000 | WO |
01019088 | Mar 2001 | WO |
01024027 | Apr 2001 | WO |
01031497 | May 2001 | WO |
01040963 | Jun 2001 | WO |
01046782 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001046782 | Jun 2001 | WO |
01053922 | Jul 2001 | WO |
01075743 | Oct 2001 | WO |
01091109 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02005517 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02011123 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02015081 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02017591 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02019625 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02027600 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02037381 | May 2002 | WO |
02045034 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02061652 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02065305 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02065318 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02069121 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03009277 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03091990 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03094499 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03096337 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004010352 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004040416 | May 2004 | WO |
2004040475 | May 2004 | WO |
2004061699 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005025217 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005064885 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005101243 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005111998 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006012241 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006025797 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007056531 | May 2007 | WO |
2007056532 | May 2007 | WO |
2008042953 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008044664 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008045950 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008110002 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008110790 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009011206 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009061651 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064561 | May 2009 | WO |
2010095320 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010127268 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2012177866 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012177870 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012177872 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012177874 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 20153572.1, dated Oct. 25, 2022, 83 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with application No. CA 2,773,567, dated Mar. 6, 2014, 2 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” mailed in connection with application No. CN 201210105474.3, dated Feb. 8, 2014, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,646, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Mar. 10, 2014, 48 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596, dated Apr. 9, 2014, 20 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,991, dated Apr. 11, 2014, 15 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability” mailed in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2012/043544, dated Jan. 9, 2014, 9 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272868, dated Jun. 27, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272874, dated Jun. 27, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272872, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661 dated Jul. 8, 2014, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983, dated Jun. 6, 2014, 13 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272876, dated Sep. 18, 2014, 4 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203778, dated Aug. 21, 2014, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204488, dated Aug. 12, 2014, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596, dated Sep. 25, 2014, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,646, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,646, filed Dec. 30, 2011, 78 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661, filed Dec. 30, 2011, 79 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, filed Jul. 12, 2011, 41 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983 dated Nov. 8, 2013, 13 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International application No. PCT/US2012/043535, dated Feb. 21, 2013, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147 dated Aug. 15, 2013, 46 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596 dated Nov. 21, 2013, 25 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,991 dated Dec. 6, 2013, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,961, dated Dec. 5, 2014, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,991, dated Nov. 10, 2014, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,961, filed Apr. 25, 2012, 61 pages. |
“Video: timed text tracks,” Windows Internet Explorer, Microsoft, 2012, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ie/hh673566(v=vs.85),aspx, 6 pages. |
Apple Inc. “HTTP Live Streaming Overview,” Apr. 1, 2011, 36 pages. |
Apple Inc. “Timed Metadata for HTTP Live Streaming,” Apr. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
R. Pantos, Ed., & W. May, Apple Inc. “HTTP Live Streaming: draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-07,” Sep. 2011, 33 pages. |
Eric Winkelman, “Timed Text Tracks and TV Services,” Aug. 15, 2011, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596, filed Apr. 10, 2012, 50 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983, filed Mar. 11, 2013, 68 pages. |
“What is Jacked?,” http://www.jacked.com/ retrieved on Dec. 3, 2009, 1 page). |
Anderson, “Google to compete with Nielsen for TV-ratings info?,” Ars Techmca, Jun. 19, 2006, 3 pages). |
Boehret, “Yahoo Widgets Lend Brains to Boob Tube,” The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 25, 2009, 4 pages). |
Claburn, “Google Researchers Propose TV Monitoring,” Information Week, Jun. 7, 2006, 4 pages). |
Evain, “TV-Anytime Metadata—A Preliminary Specification on Schedule!,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000 [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006], 15 pages. |
Fink et al., “Social- and Interactive-Television Applications Based on Real-Time Ambient-Audio Identification,” EuroITV, 2006, 10 pages). |
Heuer et al., “Adaptive Multimedia Messaging based on MPEG-7—The M3-Box,” Proc. Second Int'l Symposium on Mobile Multimedia Systems Applications, Nov. 9-10, 2000, 8 pages. |
Hopper, “EBU Project Group P/META Metadata Exchange Standards,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000 [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006], 25 pages. |
Kane, “Entrepreneur Plans On-Demand Videogame Service,” The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 24, 2009, 2 pages. |
Laven,“EBU Technical Review, Editorial),” No. 284, Sep. 2000 [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006], 3 pages. |
Mulder, “The Integration of Metadata From Production to Consumer,” EBU Technical Review, Sep. 2000 [http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_284-contents.html, retrieved on Jul. 20, 2006] , 5 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/033201, dated Oct. 1, 2010, 16 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/031180, dated Aug. 17, 2004, 4 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Feb. 1, 2007, 9 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Aug. 18, 2006, 10 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/061479, dated May 26, 2010, 15 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/061750, dated Mar. 3, 2010, 10 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/061827, dated Mar. 15, 2010, 12 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/031180, dated Jun. 8, 2004, 5 pages. |
Shazam, “Shazam and VidZone Digital Media announce UK1s first fixed price mobile download service for music videos,” http://www.shazam.com/music/web/newsdetail.html?nid=NEWS136, Feb. 11, 2008, 1 page). |
Shazam, “Shazam launches new music application for Facebook fans,” http://www.shazam.com/music/web/newsdetail.html?nid=NEWS135, Feb. 18, 2008, 1 page). |
Shazam, Company summary outline and list of products, 2002, 1 page). |
Stross, “Apple Wouldn't Rist its Cool Over a Gimmick, Would It?,” The New York Times, Nov. 14, 2009, 3 pages). |
Stultz, “Handheld Captioning at Disney World Theme Parks,” article retrieved on Mar. 8, 2013, http://goflorida.about.com/od/disneyworld/a/wdw_captioning.htm, 1 page). |
Sullivan, “Google Cozies up to SMBs for Digital Content,” MediaPost News, Mar. 19, 2009, 3 pages. |
USPTO, “Advisory Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Sep. 30, 2009, 4 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Mar. 18, 2010, 23 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Jul. 21, 2009, 31 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Sep. 16, 2009, 31 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Feb. 5, 2009, 48 pages. |
Wactlar et al., “Digital Video Archives: Managing Through Metadata” Building a National Strategy for Digital Preservation: Issues in Digital Media Archiving, http://www.informedia.cs.cmu.edu/documents/Wactlar-CLIR-final.pdf, Apr. 2002, 14 pages. |
Wang, “An Industrial-Strength Audio Search Algorithm,” Shazam Entertainment, Ltd., in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Baltimore, Oct. 26-30, 2003, 7 pages). |
CIPO, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Aug. 26, 2008, 4 pages. |
CIPO, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Mar. 23, 2009, 5 pages. |
CIPO, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Application Serial No. 2,574,998, dated Nov. 13, 2009, 10 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International application No. PCT/US2012/043539, dated Jan. 17, 2013, 9 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International application No. PCT/US2012/043544, dated Jan. 17, 2013, 15 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed in connection with International application No. PCT/US2012/043546, dated Dec. 10, 2012, 6 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Oct. 26, 2011, 38 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,245, dated Apr. 28, 2011, 48 pages. |
USPTO, “Requirement for Restriction,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,233, dated Jun. 10, 2009, 20 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661, dated Mar. 19, 2013, 10 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 30 pages. |
USPTO, “Restriction,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Aug. 10, 2012, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170 dated Nov. 8, 2013, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Dec. 22, 2014, 34 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,548, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,959 dated Jan. 30, 2015, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983, dated Jan. 9, 2015, 12 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,974, dated Feb.18, 2015, 12 pages). |
Mexican Patent Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/000280, dated Jan. 21, 2015, 5 pages, English translation included). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170, dated Jun. 18, 2014, 18 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170, dated Dec. 5, 2014, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596, dated Feb. 26, 2015, 25 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,991, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,108, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,646, dated Mar. 3, 2015, 7 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” mailed in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2014-517158, dated Mar. 3, 2015, 7 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/000281, dated Feb. 25, 2015, 1 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983, dated Mar. 16, 2015, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170, dated Mar. 26, 2015, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661, dated Mar. 26, 2015, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 12803215,8, dated Apr. 20, 2015, 9 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,840,092, dated Apr. 20, 2015, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,961, dated May 20, 2015, 14 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance” mailed in connection with Application No. 201210105474.3, May 25, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,974, dated May 28, 2015, 13 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,840,094, dated May 19, 2015, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 12802805,7, dated May 27, 2015, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 12802746.3, dated May 27, 2015, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,646, dated Jun. 19, 2015, 9 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/000280, dated Jun. 12, 2015 , 1 page). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,170, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,983, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 12802202.7 dated May 28, 2015, 7 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272868, dated Jul. 22, 2015, 2 pages. |
CIPO, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Application Serial No. 2,773,567, dated Mar. 27, 2015, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,548 dated Aug. 11, 2015, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,108 dated Aug. 13, 2015, 17 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2012272872 dated Aug. 6, 2015, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,959, dated Sep. 11, 2015, 12 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2840094, dated Sep. 11, 2015, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,961, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,974, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,596, dated Oct. 20, 2015, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,991, dated Oct. 22, 2015, 20 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201280032737.0, dated Nov. 10, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,216 dated Aug. 6, 2013, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisoiy Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,611, dated Jan. 22, 2010, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,611, dated Sep. 29, 2009, 36 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,611, dated Mar. 4, 2009, 33 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,611, dated Sep. 15, 2008, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,216, dated Apr. 2, 2012, 33 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,611, dated Jun. 22, 2010, 26 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,216, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,279, dated Mar. 28, 2014, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,279, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,279, dated Apr. 23, 2015, 23 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/014970, completed Aug. 21, 2004, 6 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” mailed in connection with International Application Serial No. PCT/US2003/14970, dated Feb. 10, 2004, 1 page). |
Van Beek et al., “Metadata-Driven Multimedia Access,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 20, No. 2, Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers, Inc., New York, New York, USA, Mar. 2003, 13 pages. |
Vetro et al., “Video Transcoding Architectures and Techniques: An Overview,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 20, No. 2, Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers, Inc., New York, New York, USA, Mar. 2003, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,279, dated Nov. 17, 2015, 29 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Dec. 3, 2015, 10 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Grant,” mailed in connection with Application No. 2012272872, dated Dec. 3, 2015, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,548, dated Dec. 4, 2015, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,108, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/793,959, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661, dated Feb. 1, 2016, 8 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” mailed in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2014-517158, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 4 pages. |
Intellectual Property Office of India, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 10208/CHENP/2013, dated Apr. 11, 2018, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 18181308.0, dated Aug. 29, 2018, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 18181308.0, dated Jul. 31, 2019, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 201535721,1, dated Mar. 13, 2020, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,147, dated Feb. 18, 2016, 8 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,773,567, dated Mar. 9, 2016, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/455,961, dated Mar. 23, 2016, 17 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” mailed in connection with application No. 12002599.4 dated Mar. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,661, dated Aug. 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015252031, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,279, dated Nov. 14, 2016, 13 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201280032738.5, dated Dec. 16, 2016, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,877, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,399, dated Aug. 9, 2016, 44 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,399, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,399, dated Jan. 27, 2017, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,568, dated Feb. 24, 2017, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 12802746.3, on Feb. 23, 2017, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,877, dated May 5, 2017, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “ Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,108, dated May 5, 2017, 24 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,547, dated May 5, 2017, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,568, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 9 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201280032738.5, dated Aug. 11, 2017, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” mailed in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015252031, dated Oct. 13, 2017, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,547, dated Oct. 11, 2017, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated May 18, 2020, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Jan. 29, 2020, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 20 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 24 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 20 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 18 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,918, dated Sep. 9, 16 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 20153572.1, dated Mar. 13, 2020, 9 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Office Action,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201710999408.8, dated Feb. 3, 2020, 11 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” mailed in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201710999408.8, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 20153572.1, dated Feb. 15, 2021, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,865, dated Jun. 1, 2021, 35 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,865, dated Nov. 30, 2021, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/035,251, dated Apr. 6, 2021, 24 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” mailed in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/035,251, dated Oct. 8, 2021, 12 pages. |
Nikloaidou, P. et al. Musicpedia: retrieving and merging-interlinking music metadata: Int. J. Comput 3.8 (2011). |
Garcia, R. et al. “Semantic Integration and Retrieval of Multimedia Metadata”, SemAnnot@ ISWC, 2005. |
Hellmuth, O. et al. “Using MPEG-7 audio fingerprinting in real-world applications”, Audio Engineering Society Convention 115, Audio Engieering Society, 2003. |
Garcia, R. et al. “Multimedia content description using semantic web languages”, Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies, Springer, London, 2008, 17-54. |
Cano, P. et al. “Audio fingerprinting: concepts and applications”, Computational intelligence for modelling and predicition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, 233-245. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” mailed in connection with European Patent Application No. 20153572.1, dated May 24, 2022, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 20153572.1, dated Mar. 10, 2023, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220124016 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61568631 | Dec 2011 | US | |
61499520 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17035251 | Sep 2020 | US |
Child | 17565983 | US | |
Parent | 14922918 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 17035251 | US | |
Parent | 13341646 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14922918 | US |