Monitoring system and method for a fiber processing apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6324490
  • Patent Number
    6,324,490
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 25, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 27, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A system, software program, and method for monitoring performance of a fiber processing apparatus that preferably is a disk refiner or a filter screen that analyzes operating data pertaining to the operation of the apparatus to determine when a plate of the apparatus should be replaced before plate wear undesirably affects performance. Operating data over time is analyzed to determine whether it exhibits a trend characteristic of plate wear and, if so, a plate change recommendation is generated. In a preferred method, regression or piecewise linearization is utilized to determine a slope of the data and the slope is compared to a threshold. If above, below, or outside a certain value or window of the threshold, the recommendation is generated. To avoid fluctuations in performance not due to plate wear from affecting the determination, operating data over several hours of apparatus operation is analyzed. When a plate of an apparatus is changed, an inventory of the plates is updated. If the inventory requires replenishing, plates are ordered over a telecommunications link, such as by e-mail or FTP connection, with a remote supplier computer or system. New replacement plates can be entered into the inventory from information downloaded from a portable input device, such as a bar code scanner or the like.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a system and method of monitoring a fiber processing apparatus that preferably is a disk refiner or a filter screen that can also manage apparatus inventory.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In fibrous product processing, such as the process used to make paper, fibers, such as wood fibers and cloth fibers, are separated and mixed with water and, if desired, other ingredients to form a fibrous stock slurry. This slurry is passed through a filter or a screening apparatus, typically referred to as a filter screen, a pressure screen, or a screen cylinder, that filters the slurry to remove from the slurry large particles, such as rocks, stones, metal fragments and the like, unrefined or untreated fiber, improperly sized fiber, as well as other contaminants. After filtering the slurry at least somewhat, the slurry is introduced to a refiner, typically a disc refiner, that grinds or abrades the fibers so they become more frayed or fibrillated. These frayed fibers are beneficial because they interlock with each other during manufacturing of the fiber product to produce a stronger fiber product. For example, where paper is being manufactured, frayed fibers beneficially increase the tensile and tear strength of the paper.




An example of a disc refiner is shown and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,425,508. The refiner has at least one pair of opposed ridged ring-shaped metal refiner plates that can be formed of pie-shaped refiner plate segments. During operation, one of the refiner plates rotates relative to the other of the refiner plates while the slurry flows under relatively high pressure into a gap between the plates where the plates grind or abrade the fibers.




As one would expect, the refiner plates, or segments of the plates, wear over time which can dramatically decrease the quality of the refining action, i.e. refiner performance, such that the fibers are less frayed than desired. While various parameters of refiner operation are usually monitored, it is believed not heretofore known to collectively monitor and analyze at least some of these parameters while a refiner is operating to attempt to detect or predict when the performance or a refiner plate (or plates) has degraded to the point that that the refiner plate, or segments of the plate, should be replaced. This is because many things other than plate wear can cause the performance of a refiner to at least temporarily decrease making it extremely difficult to detect when plate wear is primarily responsible. Examples of some things that can cause refiner performance to temporarily drop include non-fibrous matter in the stock slurry, a change in stock consistency, knots, and a change in the type or size of fibers being processed.




As a result of the uncertainty of what is responsible for a decrease in refiner quality or performance, refiner plates are typically replaced according to a schedule that mandates replacement after a certain number of hours of operation whether or not replacement is really needed. For example, a typical thermomechanical pulp (TMP) mill may require replacement of the primary plates of a refiner after 2,200 hours of operation and the reject plates of the refiner after 650 hours of operation, regardless of how well the refiner is performing. Because of this, refiners may operate at a less than optimum quality or performance level with plates that needed to be replaced earlier than dictated by the replacement schedule. In other instances, refiner plates that don't need replacing are unnecessarily replaced in accordance with the replacement schedule causing needless downtime and wasting money.




The same is true for filter screens. As is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,954,249; 5,718,826; and 5,626,235, although filter screens can have other configurations, filter screens are often made of perforated and generally cylindrical screen plates, usually referred to as cylinder screens, that are held together by a frame that typically includes retaining rings and tie rods. Typically, two or more such screen plates are disposed end-to-end in a housing, forming a generally cylindrical screen assembly, with the plates held together by the tie rods that extend axially alongside the plates and which pass through the retaining rings.




Each screen plate is formed from metal wire, i.e. wedgewire, or from machined metal sheets. Each screen plate is perforated by holes that typically are slots of a predetermined size that permits objects in the slurry of a size smaller than one of the slots and liquid to pass through the plate. The material retained, referred to as rejects, is drawn away from the surface of the screen plate usually by the head of a moving foil that is located adjacent the screen assembly. The rejects are directed from the filter screen out a discharge port for disposal.




To help ensure that only the slurry is made up of only refined fibers and liquid when it reaches a fiber product processing machine, such as a paper machine, the slurry often passes through several stages of filter screens. Each filter screen typically has correspondingly smaller and smaller holes or slots such that it is possible to limit the size of the fibers that actually arrive at the fiber product-processing machine.




Unfortunately, screen plates wear rather slowly during operation and then rapidly degrade in performance in a rather short time, which makes screen plate failure difficult to predict. To prevent screen plate wear from adversely impacting the fiber product manufacturing process, screen plates are also changed according to a schedule. While the flow rate of the slurry through a particular filter screen can be monitored to provide some sort of an estimate of filter screen efficiency or quality, it is believed heretofore not known to collectively monitor and analyze this and other filter screen operating parameters to attempt to detect or predict when the performance of a screen plate has degraded to the point that it needs to be replaced.




Finally, because fiber product manufacturing processes often operate around the clock seven days a week, an inventory of replacement refiner plates and screen plates are usually kept nearby. Unfortunately, keeping an inventory of these plates takes up valuable and costly space that could be devoted to other more efficient aspects of fiber product production.




Therefore, what is needed is a system and method of managing an inventory of one or both refiner plates and screen plates that minimizes the storage space required at or nearby the fiber product manufacturing plant. What is also needed is a system and method of monitoring refiner performance to detect and preferably indicate when one or more plates of a refiner should be replaced. What is further needed is a system and method of monitoring filter screen performance to detect and preferably indicate when one or more screen plates of a filter screen should be replaced. What is still further needed is a system and method of monitoring refiners and filter screens to detect when one or more plates need to be replaced.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A system, software program, and method of monitoring operation of a fiber processing apparatus that preferably is either or both a refiner and a filter screen. The system includes a computer that is linked to a plurality of sensors that sense data that pertains to the operation of at least one fiber processing apparatus. The computer is configured with a program that monitors operating data pertaining to the operation of a fiber processing apparatus to help determine, estimate or predict about when a plate of the apparatus should be changed.




The operating data over a period of time of apparatus operation is monitored for a change in the data that indicates a trend toward reduced apparatus performance. The change is analyzed to determine whether it is attributable to plate wear or other factors not related to plate wear. If it is determined that the change is due to plate wear, a recommendation to replace the plate is generated.




In determining whether the change is due to plate wear, the operating data can be analyzed to detect whether performance has fallen below a threshold that indicates the plate should be changed. In one preferred method of determining whether to change the plate, a set of operating data over time is analyzed by a regression technique to determine whether a result or characteristic of the regression technique compared against the threshold indicates the change in data is due to plate wear.




In one preferred regression technique, linear regression or piecewise linearization is used to obtain a slope, an operating slope, of the operating data. The operating slope is compared with a threshold slope to determine whether the operating slope is within a certain acceptable window of the threshold slope that indicates that apparatus performance has not degraded sufficiently so as to warrant a recommendation to replace the plate. If the operating slope is outside the acceptable window, the recommendation to replace the plate is generated. In one preferred implementation, a plate change recommendation is generated if the slope is negative. In another preferred implementation, the plate change recommendation is generated if the slope is not within about 10% or 20% of the threshold slope.




The threshold slope is a slope of operating data taken at a time prior to at least some of the data upon which the operating slope is based. In one preferred implementation, the threshold slope is determined from a baseline obtained about when or shortly after the plate was first installed. In another preferred implementation, the threshold slope can be a prior operating slope or can be the slope from a set of data taken shortly before determining the operating slope. The threshold slope is based on data sufficient to provide a baseline from which change can be detected. If desired, the threshold slope can simply be a predetermined value that can be user defined.




To avoid transient fluctuations in data and apparatus performance from falsely triggering a plate change recommendation, data is taken over a large enough sampling period so as to filter out the fluctuations. For example, because the decline in performance of a refiner plate usually happens over a period of about one hundred hours, refiner-related data taken for a time of at least about the most recent fifty hours of refiner operation and no greater than about the most recent two hundred hours of refiner operation is used to determine the operating slope. In another example, because the decline in performance of a filter screen plate happens much more rapidly, typically within about an eight hour period, filter screen-related data is taken for a period of time of at least about the most recent four hours of filter screen operation and no greater than about the most recent twenty-four hours of filter screen operation is used to determine the operating slope.




In a preferred method of managing an inventory of fiber processing apparatus plates, the inventory is updated when one or more plates are added to the inventory or if one or more plates are removed from the inventory. Plates added to the inventory, such as when a shipment of plates are received, can be provided from a portable device that inputs or scans plate identification information of a tag of the plate being inventoried. The portable device is linked to the computer and the plate identification information is downloaded to the computer.




Plates removed from the inventory typically are removed when they are installed on a fiber processing apparatus. When a plate is installed on an apparatus, a record for that apparatus is updated to reflect the installed plate and to reflect that a different plate was removed from the apparatus. Each apparatus being monitored by the computer preferably has such a record. The plate removed goes to another record that keeps track of removed plates.




The inventory is monitored to determine whether the number of plates in the inventory has fallen below a desired threshold or below a desired threshold for a particular fiber processing apparatus. If so, replacement plates are automatically ordered preferably by a link to a remote computer that provides the order to a supplier of plates. Preferably, the link is a telecommunications link that permits the order to be placed by e-mail or by FTP connection with the supplier computer.




When an order is placed, confirmation of the order from the supplier computer preferably is received while the link with the supplier computer is established. If desired, the order confirmation can be displayed or printed.




It is an object of the present invention to more accurately detect when plate wear will or is about to so adversely affect performance of the fiber processing apparatus that it should be changed.




It is an advantage of the present invention that more accurate detection of plate wear enables plate use to be extended reducing plate replacement costs.




It is an object of the present invention to detect plate wear at an early enough stage before it significantly impacts the quality of the fiber-based product being produced.




It is an advantage of the present invention that it optimizes fiber processing by minimizing the impact of plate wear.




It is another object of the invention to filter out transient changes in performance unrelated to plate wear to maximize the useful life of the plate.




It is another advantage of the present invention that transient changes in performance are filtered to prevent them from triggering a plate change.




It is another object of the present invention to conveniently monitor operation and performance of more than one fiber processing apparatus that can be located in more than one place using a minimum of labor thereby saving money, time and labor.




Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention include: a monitoring system that can advantageously interface with an existing fiber processing apparatus data acquisition system such as a paper mill's distributed control system (DCS), a monitoring system that is capable of both monitoring apparatus performance while also maintaining and managing inventory of plates for the apparatus; that reduces fiber processing apparatus downtime; that maximizes fiber processing quality; that is flexible in that it can have thresholds that trigger a plate change recommendation that can be user defined, can be different for different types of refiners and filter screens, and can be adjusted for changes in a refiner or filter screen; and is a system and software program that is simple, flexible, reliable, and robust, and which is of economical manufacture and is easy to assemble, install, and use.











Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and accompanying drawings, while indicating at least one preferred embodiment of the present invention, are given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof, and the invention includes all such modifications.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout and in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a monitoring and inventorying system of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic view showing a host computer linked to sensors of a refiner and a filter screen;





FIGS. 3

is a flow chart of a method of the invention;





FIGS. 4-5

are flow charts of a method for monitoring refiner/filter screen operation;





FIG. 6

is a plot of refiner or filter screen performance over operating time illustrating performance variations not due to plate wear;





FIG. 7

is a second plot of refiner or filter screen performance over operating illustrating a decrease in performance due to plate wear; and





FIGS. 8A

,


8


B and


9


are flowcharts of a method of inventory management.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIGS. 1 and 2

illustrate a system


30


of this invention for monitoring operation of at least one disc refiner


32


, at least one filter screen


34


, or a combination of at least one refiner


32


and at least one filter screen


34


to detect and indicate when performance of the refiner


32


or the filter screen


34


has degraded such that one or more of its plates


36


,


38


or


40


must be changed. Preferably, the system


30


of this invention is capable of monitoring, substantially simultaneously or in sequence, a plurality of refiners


32


, a plurality of filter screens


34


, or a plurality refiners


32


and a plurality filter screens


34


. Advantageously, the system


30


of this invention is also capable of monitoring refiners


32


and/or filter screens


34


located in two or more different fiber processing plants


44


. In another preferred feature of the system


30


of this invention, the system


32


can be configured to help manage an inventory of plates


36


,


38


and/or


40


and order replacement plates


36


,


38


and/or


40


in an automated manner when additional plates


36


,


38


and/or


40


are needed.




The system includes a host computer


46


, such as a personal computer or the like, capable of executing a software program of this invention, preferred flowcharts of which are shown in

FIGS. 3-5

, that is capable of analyzing the performance of one or more refiners


32


, one or more filter screens


34


, or one or more refiners


32


and one or more filter screens


34


to detect and indicate when one or more of their plates


36


,


38


and


40


should be replaced. The computer


46


is shown in

FIG. 1

linked to a plurality of pairs of refiners


32


and a plurality of pairs of filter screens


34


such that a plurality of variables each related to the operation of each refiner


32


and a plurality of variables each related to the operation of each filter screen


34


can be monitored.




The main unit


48


of the host computer


46


preferably houses at least one on-board processor linked to memory, such as on-board random-access memory or the like, and can also be linked to a storage device, such as a disk drive or the like. The computer


46


also has at least one input device, such as a keyboard


50


, can have a mouse or another pointing device, and preferably has a display


52


. As is shown in more detail in

FIG. 2

, the computer


48


preferably also has one or more means for acquiring data


54


including at least one data acquisition device or a data acquisition system capable of receiving data from one or more refiners and/or one or more filter screens. Such data acquisition means


54


can be a separate component linked to the computer


46


and the refiners


32


and/or filter screens


34


but can comprise a distributed control system (DCS) (or an interface with a DCS) at the fiber processing plant or fiber product manufacturing plant that is linked to the refiners


32


and filter screens


34


.




Referring again to

FIG. 1

, to enter inventory of replacement plates, such as refiner plates


36


and


38


, refiner plate segments, or screen plates


40


, a separate input device


56


can be used. In one preferred embodiment, the input device


56


is portable such that it can easily be carried by a person from one location to another location. Example of suitable input devices


56


that are portable include handheld computers, personal digital assistants, and notebook, laptop or subnotebook computers. Other types of input devices can be used. As is depicted by line


58


, the input device


56


can be directly linked to the host computer


46


, such as by a cable, a cradle, a network, or the like, or indirectly linked, such as by an infrared link or a radio-frequency (RF) link.




While entry of the inventory data for a particular plate or plate segment, depicted in an exemplary manner by reference numeral


38


, can be done manually, such as by keying in the data, it preferably is done in an automated manner, such as through the use of the input device


56


, or another device linked to the input device, sensing a tag


60


of the plate


38


. Such a tag


60


can be a label applied to the plate


38


but can be something other than a label and can be a separate or integral part of the plate


38


. One preferred example of a suitable tag


60


is a bar code label that is sensed by the input device


56


, such as by optical scanning. Other types of tags


60


can be used including, for example, magnetic tags, transponders, or optically readable labels, such as holograms, masks, or the like.




In one preferred system embodiment, the input device


56


comprises a bar code scanner that scans a bar code label


60


attached to the plate


38


. The scanner


56


preferably has a memory storage capable of storing at least several, if not several hundred or several thousand, inventory entries that are later downloaded to the host computer


46


when it is linked to the computer


46


.




To order replacement plates


36


,


38


and/or


40


in an automated manner to replenish inventory, the host computer


46


can be connected by a link


62


to another computer


64


that preferably is a supplier computer


64


located remote from the host computer


46


and that preferably is located at or in communication with a supplier of plates. Such a supplier can be a sales representative, a distributor, a retailer, or a manufacturer of the plates that is located at a site remote from the site of the host computer


46


. The two computers


46


and


64


preferably are linked, at least from time to time, preferably by a telecommunications link


62


, such that one computer can communicate with the other the computer. In one type of preferred link


62


, the host computer


46


communicates by e-mail with the supplier computer


62


to order additional replacement plates. In another preferred type of link


62


, the host computer


46


communicates with the supplier computer


64


via a file transfer protocol (FTP) link over the Internet. In a still further type of link


62


, the host computer


46


communicates by a telecommunications link, preferably by telephone, with a bulletin board system (BBS) of the supplier. In still another type of link


62


, the link is a fax link.




In a preferred system arrangement, the monitoring computer


46


is directly or indirectly connected by links, indicated by reference numerals


66


-


76


in

FIG. 1

, to refiners


32


and to filter screens


34


. For example, one or more of the links


66


-


76


can be a cable between each refiner


32


and the computer


46


and each filter screen


34


and the computer


46


. If desired, the computer


46


can be part of or interface with a network that is in communication with the refiners


32


and the filter screens


34


. An example of such a network used in paper mills, including newsprint paper mills, is a DCS. If desired, the network can be partially or totally wireless.




The refiner


32


can be a refiner of the type used in thermomechanical pulping, refiner-mechanical pulping, chemithermomechanical pulping, or another type of pulping or fiber processing application. The refiner


32


can be a counterrotating refiner, a double disc or twin refiner, or a conical disc refiner known in the industry as a CD refiner. Examples of refiners


32


that can be used with the system and method of the invention are disclosed in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,823,453, and 5,425,508, the disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.




The filter screen


34


can be a horizontal or vertical filter screen each having one or more screen plates


40


arranged in a cylinder or which can be flat. As is shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the plates


40


are received in a housing


41


shown in phantom. Examples of filter screens


34


that can be used with the system and method of the invention are disclosed in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,954,249; 5,718,826; and 5,626,235, the disclosures of which are each expressly incorporated herein by reference.




The link


70


between the host computer


46


and one of the refiners


32


and the link


76


between the computer


46


and one of the filter screens


34


is shown in more detail in the schematic of FIG.


2


. The computer


46


is connected by a link


78


to a data acquisition system


54


, or is further comprised of a data acquisition system


54


that can be internal to or integral with the computer


46


. In one preferred embodiment, the data acquisition system


54


is comprised of a plurality of data acquisition cards


80


-


88


, or data acquisition modules, each having one or more links to a sensor of the refiner


32


and/or the filter screen


34


. If desired, the data acquisition system


54


can be comprised of one or more data acquisition cards installed in slots inside the computer


46


. While

FIG. 2

depicts a link from a refiner


32


or a filter screen


34


running to a single card or module, a single card or module can have two or more links.




Examples of suitable data acquisition cards or modules include one or more of the following: a model 118 series analog-to-digital data acquisition card marketed by Sensoray of 7337 SW Tech Center Drive, Tigard, Oreg., a model SIG32C-8 digital signal processing multichannel board, a model ADC64 high-speed multichannel board, a model Sig56-2 low cost measurement board, and/or a MOTOROLA EVM56xxx series board, all four of which are marketed by Signalogic of 9617 Wendell of Dallas, Tex., a model 5516DMA data acquisition board marketed by ADAC Corporation of 70 Tower Park, Woburn, Mass., and/or a CIO-DAS16/440I analog-to-digital board, a D1000 or D2000 series modular digital transmitter with RS-232 or RS-485 output(s), and/or an ADC-16 8-channel high resolution analog input board for IBM compatibles, all three of which are marketed by Omega Engineering, Inc., of One Omega Drive, Stamford, Conn. Of course, other data acquisition boards, modules, and devices can be used.




Examples of suitable data acquisition systems include a DATASHUTTLE Series DS-12 or DS-16 portable data acquisition system, a DATASHUTTLE EXPRESS high speed portable data acquisition system, an INSTRUNET series PCI data acquisition system, an OMB-LOGBOOK-300 stand-alone personal-computer data acquisition system, all of which are marketed by Omega Engineering, Inc. Other data acquisition systems can be used.




As is schematically represented in

FIG. 2

, there are a plurality of sensors associated with each refiner


32


and filter screen


34


being monitored with at least some of the sensors ultimately linked to or in communication with the data acquisition system


54


.




With regard to the refiner


32


schematically depicted in

FIG. 2

, a first sensor


90


enables the power output of the main motor of the refiner


32


to be determined. Although the sensor


90


is schematically depicted in

FIG. 2

as being carried by the refiner housing


43


, such a sensor


90


preferably comprises a current transformer coupled to the refiner motor or a power input shaft of the refiner


32


whose voltage or output signal is converted to a value from which the power output is determined. Thus, the sensor


90


can further include a current or voltage sensor that is in communication with the transformer, if desired. Other types of sensors can be used.




A second sensor


92


preferably comprises a force sensor that senses the applied force of at least one of the refiner plates


36


or


38


of the refiner


32


urging that plate toward the other refiner plate. A third sensor


94


preferably also comprises a force sensor that senses the applied force of the other plate. Although the sensors


92


and


94


are schematically depicted in

FIG. 2

as being carried by the refiner housing, such sensors


92


and


94


can comprise accelerometers in communication with each plate, one or more strain gauges on the shaft of each rotating refiner plate, or a pressure sensor that senses the hydraulic pressure being applied to urge one of the plates toward the other of the plates. Other types of pressure sensors can be used.




A fourth sensor


96


enables the gap between the refiner plates


36


and


38


to be sensed or measured and can be a sensor


96


that enables the plate gap to be indirectly or directly sensed or measured. An example of a suitable indirect gap sensor is an inductive sensor such as a differential transformer that is carried by at least one of the refiner plates


36


or


38


. Another example of a suitable gap sensor


96


is a Hall effect sensor, part of which is disposed in one of the refiner plates and exposed toward the other of the plates. Other types of refiner plate gap sensors can be used.




A fifth sensor comprises a sensor


98


that enables a determination of the rate of flow of dilution water added to the fibrous stock slurry during refining to replace water in the slurry that vaporizes, i.e. turns to steam, during refining. Although schematically shown carried by the refiner housing, the fifth sensor


98


preferably is a flowmeter that is in communication with the flow of dilution water added to the slurry that comes from a pipe. The pipe typically introduces the dilution water at the refiner plates


36


and


38


or upstream of the plates


36


and


38


.




Another refiner-related sensor


100


that can be monitored can be a consistency sensor or arrangement of sensors from which consistency is determined or estimated. Included in such an arrangement of sensors


100


is a sensor that senses rotation of a conveyor screw, typically in revolutions per minute (rpm), used to introduce wood chips or pulp into that part of the stock system that ultimately travels through the refiner. The sensor arrangement


100


can further comprise one or more of the following sensors that are in communication with the flow of the slurry: a paddle-wheel type consistency sensor, an optical consistency sensor, or a viscosity meter.




A number of these refiner-related sensors and other sensors that can be monitored by the system


30


of this invention are disclosed in more detail in one or more of U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,148,439; 4,184,204; 4,626,318; 4,661,911; 4,820,980; 5,011,090; 5,016,824; 5,491,340; and 5,605,290, the disclosures of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.




With regard to the filter screen


34


depicted in

FIG. 2

, a first sensor


102


preferably senses or measures the flow of the slurry through the screen


34


and preferably comprises a flowmeter. Where applicable, the sensor


102


can comprise a sensor arrangement


102


that can include one or more flow rate sensors that sense or measure the feed flow into the screen


34


, the accept flow out of the screen


34


, the reject flow out of the screen


34


, and the dilution water flow, where dilution water is added.




A second sensor or arrangement of sensors


104


can be constructed and arranged to sense or measure the pressure drop of the slurry across the filter screen


34


and can comprise, for example, an upstream pressure sensor that senses pressure upstream of the screen


34


and a downstream pressure sensor downstream that senses pressure downstream of the screen


34


. In one preferred arrangement, one of the pressure sensors of the arrangement


102


senses the pressure of the feed flow into the screen


34


and the other of the pressure sensors senses the pressure of the accept flow out of the screen


34


. Where applicable, the arrangement


102


can include one or more additional pressure sensors that sense the pressure of the reject flow out of the screen


34


and that sense the pressure of the dilution water flow, where dilution water is added.




A third sensor or sensor arrangement


106


preferably can be used to sense or measure the consistency of the slurry such as by measuring its dry-to-wet content. The sensor


106


can be a paddlewheel-type consistency sensor or an optical consistency sensor that is mounted in the slurry line either or both upstream and downstream of the filter screen


34


. Another sensor that can be used is a viscosity meter.




A method of this invention is depicted in

FIGS. 3-9

. The method of this invention preferably is implemented in the form of a computer program


110


that is executed by the host computer


46


. Such a program


110


can be event driven, such as is depicted by the loop


112


that begins at START


114


and returns to START


114


. The program


110


preferably can be exited by a key combination or by a menu selection, such as by selecting “exit” from a “file” menu of the program


110


.




As is shown in

FIG. 3

, the program


110


has at least a monitoring branch


116


that monitors operation of refiners


32


, filter screens


34


, or refiners


32


and filter screens


34


. The program


110


can also have an inventory branch


118


that helps monitor and manage inventory. In a preferred embodiment, the program


110


has a monitoring branch


116


and an inventory branch


118


.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, during monitoring


116


each apparatus, i.e. refiner


32


and/or filter screen


34


, is monitored by the host computer


46


preferably polling sensors


120


that pertain to the operation of the apparatus to obtain or measure data from the sensors. For example, where the apparatus is a refiner


32


, the sensors polled preferably include at least one or more of sensors


90


,


92


,


94


,


96


,


98


and


100


previously discussed. Where the apparatus is a filter screen


34


, the sensors polled preferably include one or more of sensors


102


,


104


, and


106


. Each refiner


32


and/or filter screen


34


linked to the host computer


46


is repeatedly polled, preferably in sequence or one apparatus after another. If desired, the data received by the host computer


46


can come directly or indirectly from measurements made in a laboratory that pertain to operation of a refiner


32


or a filter screen


34


.




The measured data, whether raw or already at least partially processed, can be assimilated by the host computer


46


such as by processing the measured data


122


of the particular apparatus into a more useful form. If desired, some or all of the processing can be performed by the data acquisition system or a data acquisition card such that data in the form of processed one or more values are provided to the computer


46


in step


122


.




For example, where it is desired to determine the power output of the main refiner motor, unprocessed measured data from an associated sensor


90


can be processed to provide the power output. Likewise, unprocessed measured data from refiner sensor


92


can be processed to provide the force of one of the refiner plates, unprocessed measured data from refiner sensor


94


can be processed to provide the force of the other one of refiner plates, unprocessed measured data from the refiner gap sensor


96


can be processed to determine or estimate the gap between the plates


36


and


38


, unprocessed measured data from the dilution water flowmeter


98


can be processed to provide the magnitude of dilution water added, and unprocessed measured data from a consistency sensor or sensor arrangement


100


can be processed to provide consistency.




With regard to each filter screen


34


being monitored, measured data from the flow rate sensor


102


can be processed to provide the flow rate of the slurry, unprocessed measured data from the pressure sensors


104


can be processed to provide the pressure drop, Δp, across the filter screen


34


, and unprocessed measured data from consistency related sensors


106


can be processed to determine the consistency of the slurry.




After any needed processing of data measured from the sensor signals is done, as indicated by reference numeral


122


, measured data is analyzed to determine whether the apparatus is performing acceptably in step


124


. If it is determined that the apparatus is performing acceptably


124


, monitoring of the next apparatus proceeds in sequence. In a preferred embodiment of the program


100


, the program


110


preferably returns to loop


112


after monitoring one apparatus and monitoring of the next apparatus proceeds in sequence.




Preferably, data for at least the previous twenty-four hours of operation of the apparatus is stored or kept. Such data can be kept in a file that can be a database file that is accessible by the host computer


46


. Preferably, data for at least the most recent four-hour period of operation is retrieved and analyzed to determine whether the apparatus is performing unacceptably such that one or more of its plates should be replaced.




If it is determined that the apparatus is not performing acceptably, a recommendation is generated in step


126


that the plate or plates of the particular apparatus be replaced. Such a recommendation


126


preferably is carried out in the form of a message that appears on the display


52


of the host computer


46


. If desired, an audible alarm can be emitted when a recommendation


126


is made and the recommendation can be printed out. Monitoring of other linked apparatuses preferably continues even while the recommendation


126


is displayed. Preferably, the recommendation


126


displayed indicates exactly which apparatus needs plate replacement.




In determining whether the apparatus is performing acceptably in step


124


, the data pertaining to the operation of the apparatus is stored and compared with other data that was previously stored for that particular apparatus. The data is then analyzed to determine if there is a trend that has developed that warrants recommending replacing the plates of the apparatus. The data analyzed preferably includes the data measured during the most recent monitoring cycle.




In a preferred method of analyzing the data provided from monitoring apparatus operation, regression, such as polynomial regression, is performed on the data to determine whether the data has a particular trend for a particular period of apparatus operation that indicates that the loss of performance of the apparatus is not due to any relatively transient occurrence but is due to plate wear such that the plate or plates should be changed. Preferably, the type of polynomial regression performed is linear regression, such as simple linear regression. In a preferred implementation of the method of the invention, the regression analysis is done by piecewise linearization of data in the time domain.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, after step


128


is performed, one or more results are analyzed to determine whether the result(s) are less than or greater than a predetermined threshold in step


130


. Such a threshold preferably is a value, set of values, or criteria against which the result(s) are compared.





FIG. 6

illustrates an exemplary plot of points of, indicated by reference numeral


132


, of a set of data, P, versus apparatus operating time where there are variations in apparatus performance not due to plate wear. A representative line


134


fitted to the points, such as by using the method of least squares or by piecewise linearization, shows that the slope of the line


134


is not negative, i.e. not downward, or not sufficiently negative over time indicating any variations in apparatus performance are not due to plate wear. When a newly installed plate first begins operation, a set of such data is stored and analyzed to provide a benchmark against which later data sets are compared. Although line


134


appears to slope slightly upwardly over time a line at or about startup of a newly installed plate is generally horizontal or generally parallel to the x-axis, in this case the time axis.





FIG. 7

illustrates a second exemplary plot of points


136


of a set of data, P, versus operating time where apparatus performance has degraded because of plate wear such that it is recommended that one or more plates of the apparatus be changed. A representative line


138


fitted to the points shows that the slope of the line has changed relative to the slope of exemplary baseline


134


with the change in slope being sufficiently great such that it indicates a trend in apparatus performance due primarily to plate wear. In this instance, the slope of line


138


is negative, i.e. downward, or sufficiently negative in the direction of increasing time indicating a trend in apparatus performance due primarily to plate wear. The plot preferably can be displayed on the display


52


, if desired but the line, as well as its slope, may simply be determined by the computer


46


without being displayed.




For example, where refiner performance is being monitored, linear regression or piecewise linearization of data points representing its performance over time is performed in step


128


and the result is compared against the threshold or baseline. If the result is less than the threshold or baseline, thus indicating degrading refiner performance due to plate wear and not due other anomalies, step


126


is executed and a recommendation is made that one or more refiner plates


36


and/or


38


be replaced.




In one preferred embodiment, data from the aforementioned refiner sensors,


90


,


92


,


94


,


96


,


98


and


100


, including real time data, is polled or inputted and stored periodically, preferably every so often or at each occurrence of a minimum increment of time. One example of a specific minimum increment of time is each refiner monitoring cycle. Another example of a specific minimum increment of time is at least about every two hours. If desired, the monitoring cycle can be made to substantially coincide with this minimum increment of time.




In performing step


128


, a set of stored refiner quality data is retrieved and regression or piecewise linearization is performed on a set of data of at least the most recent twenty hours of refiner operation. In one preferred implementation, the set of data analyzed pertains to at least about the most recent fifty hours of refiner operation and no more than about the most recent two hundred hours of refiner operation. Preferably, the set of data analyzed pertains to at least about the most recent one hundred hours of refiner operation. Such a preferred range of time is not mere design choice but rather ensures that operating data noise, such as fluctuations in refiner performance not likely attributable to plate wear, are filtered out so that any slope derived from such operating data can be relied upon with confidence to determine whether performance changes are indeed due to plate wear.




As refiner plates


36


and/or


38


or screen plates


40


wear out, the slope of a straight line, such as lines


134


or


138


, fitted to the data varies over the time. The method of the invention substantially continuously fits a straight line to the data it processes and stores, such as during each monitoring cycle, and from the slope of the line enables an estimate to be made of when the plates need to be changed. It is important that this estimate be substantially continuously updated during operation of the apparatus since, depending on plate wear and other factors not related to plate wear, it will change. The estimate results in recommendation that a plate be changed when the presently-determined slope of the line changes a sufficient amount over a minimum window of time as compared to a previously-determined threshold that comprises a baseline slope of data taken when the plate was first installed. The plate change can also be made when the presently determined slope is compared to a previously determined slope, such as the slope calculated during the most recent monitoring cycle. If desired, the presently determined slope can be compared against a threshold slope that can be user defined and which can vary from apparatus to another. In this manner, the threshold that triggers plate replacement can be tailored for the operating characteristics of a particular refiner or filter screen.




For a data set of N data points (x


i


,y


i


), such as is depicted in

FIGS. 6 and 7

, where x


i


is in the time domain and y


i


is a quality parameter related to the apparatus being monitored, the data points are approximated by a straight line model:








y


(


x


)=


y


(


x;a,b


)=


a+bx








where b is the slope. Assuming that the uncertainty, σ


i


, associated with each y


i


is known, and that the x


i


are known exactly, it can then be measured how well the model agrees with the data according to:








X
2



(

a
,
b

)


=




i
=
1

N




(



y
i

-
a
-

bx
i



σ
i


)

2












Variables that can be used for evaluation of plate performance using the method of the invention can be pulp quality variables, such as tensile and tear indices, and/or process measurements, such as hydraulic load and valve openings. Examples of variables that can be used for evaluation using the method of the invention include quality, tensile index, tear index, fiber length, shive content, shive removal, freeness, bulk, and fiber distribution. Other variables can also be used including process, axial thrust load (refiner), cleanliness (filter screen), contaminant removal or efficiency (filter screen), specific energy, disk gap (refiner), dilution, amount of generated steam, i.e. valve openings (refiner), amount of long fiber, fiber fractionation, vibration, as well as the pressure differential of the stock across the apparatus. The data for one or more of these variables can be obtained from lab results or from real-time inline measurements being taken periodically or continuously during apparatus operation.




When the slope, b, of the fitted line becomes steeper than a predetermined threshold, such as was previously discussed, the method of the invention will result in a recommendation that the plate be changed. The method also is, in effect, predictive in that the data evaluated can be used to extrapolate about when in time performance will likely degrade to less than what is desired for acceptable performance.




In some instances, two or more of the aforementioned variables can be evaluated at the same time using the method of the invention to ensure that an accurate judgement is made of when plate wear is or will become so great as to require plate replacement. For example, the tensile index and the change in the disk gap for a particular refiner may both be monitored and analyzed to determine when the plate should be changed. By simultaneously evaluating two variables, a double-check or failsafe preferably results that provides greater confidence that a plate change recommendation is accurate.




To, in effect, filter the data to minimize the impact of variations in the monitored variable or variable(s) attributed to transient variations in performance, the set of data points analyzed extends over a period of at least about twenty hours of operation where a refiner is being monitored, and over a period of at least about four hours of operation where a filter screen is being monitored. In another preferred method of filtering the data, the data may be periodically stored over greater lengths of time rather than continuously stored. For example, while between one and fifteen measurements of each of the above-discussed variables are made during each day of operation, a pair of measurements each day, a single measurement per day, per two days, or per week may be stored for analysis.




Therefore, linear regression or piecewise linearization preferably is performed on the data set to obtain the slope, b, of a line fitted to the data set of a particular apparatus. In one preferred implementation, if the slope, b, becomes negative, a plate change recommendation


126


is made. In another preferred implementation, if the slope, b, changes more than about 10% from the threshold, a plate change recommendation is generated. For example, if the slope, b, changes more than about 10% from a baseline slope measurement or from the slope of the most recent slope determination, the plate change recommendation is made.




For a refiner


32


, a plate change recommendation preferably is generated if the slope, b, is not within about 20% of the threshold. In one preferred implementation of the method, a plate change recommendation is made for a refiner if its slope, b, changes more than about 20% in any given one hundred-hour period of operation.




For a filter screen, a plate change recommendation is made if the slope changes more than about 10% from the threshold. For example, in a preferred implementation of the method of this invention, a plate change recommendation is made for a filter screen if the slope, b, changes more than about 10% in any given eight-hour or ten-hour period of operation. If desired, the threshold can be the slope for the previous eight period of operation. If desired, the monitoring period can be as little as four hours. A relatively short period is desired because, although screen plates last longer than refiner plates, performance of a screen plate degrades at a far more rapid rate once it begins degrading. This is believed to be because it takes a very long time for the protective coating on a screen plate to wear off and expose the base metal underneath. Failure and hence performance degradation typically is rapid once the coating wears off.




Where filter screen performance is being monitored, linear regression of data points representing its performance over time is performed in step


128


and the result is compared against the threshold. If the result is less than the threshold, thus indicating reduced filter screen performance due to plate wear and not other anomalies or transient conditions, step


126


is executed and a recommendation that one or more screen plates


40


be replaced is made.




In one preferred embodiment, data from one or more of the aforementioned filter screen sensors,


102


,


104


and


106


, is measured to obtain quality and the quality is stored preferably at specific increments of time. One example of a specific increment of time is each monitoring cycle. Another example of a specific increment of time is at least about every hour.




In performing the step


128


, a set of stored data is retrieved for a predetermined number of hours of filter screen operation and regression, such as piecewise linearization, is performed on the data set. In one preferred implementation, the set of data analyzed is for at least about the most recent four hours of filter screen operation and preferably no more than about the most recent ten hours of refiner operation. In another preferred implementation, the set of data retrieved is for at least about the most recent four hours of filter screen operation and preferably no more than about the most recent eight hours of refiner operation. Such a small window of time preferably enables the beginning of rapid performance decline to be detected so the plate


40


of the filter screen


34


can be changed before performance adversely affects fiber product quality.




Preferably, linear regression is performed on the data set to obtain the slope, b, of a line fitted to the data set. In one preferred implementation, if the slope, b, of the fitted line is negative, a plate change recommendation


126


is generated. In another preferred implementation, if the slope, b, of the fitted line changes more than about 10% from a threshold slope, the plate change recommendation is generated.




Another branch of the program, the inventorying branch


118


is flowcharted in more detail in an exemplary manner in

FIGS. 8A and 8B

. Where it is desired to update the inventory, such as in step


140


, it is determined whether or not plates are being added to the inventory


142


. The inventory preferably is kept in the form of a computer-readable file that preferably is a database file capable of being stored by a storage device. One preferred example of such a file is an open-database connectivity (ODBC) database file that advantageously enables the inventory database file to be read by other software programs and computers other than the host computer


46


. By its implementation, a preferred method of this invention is capable of inventorying at least a plurality of pairs of plates, is capable of keeping track of the plates


36


and


38


installed on a plurality of pairs of refiners


32


, is capable of keeping track of one or more screen plates


40


installed on a plurality of pairs of filter screens


34


, and is capable of keeping track of such data for refiners


32


and filter screens


34


located at two or more different fiber processing/fiber product manufacturing plants.




If it is determined that plates are to be inputted into the inventory in step


144


, the inventory is updated in step


146


by adding the plates to the inventory. Preferably, the database is constructed to keep track of plates by whether the plate is for a refiner


32


or filter screen


34


as well as by plate manufacturer and model. Preferably, such database information can be shown on the display


52


or printed.




Where plates are not being added to the inventory but the inventory is being changed


148


, it is determined, as is indicated by reference numeral


150


, whether plates were installed on a refiner


32


or on a filter screen


34


. If refiner plates


36


and/or


38


have been installed on a refiner


32


, a record for the particular refiner


32


is updated, as indicated by reference numeral


152


, to reflect the refiner plate or refiner plates removed from the refiner


32


, and, as indicated by reference numeral


154


, to reflect the plate or plates installed on the refiner


32


. Thereafter, the inventory can be updated


146


preferably by updating and, if desired, saving the inventory database file.




Where the inventory is being changed by changing screen plates of a filter screen


34


, such as is indicated in

FIG. 8B

by reference numeral


156


, a record for the particular filter screen is updated, as indicated by reference numeral


158


, to reflect the screen plate


40


or screen plates


40


removed from the filter screen


34


, and, as indicated by reference numeral


160


, to reflect the screen plate


40


or screen plates


40


installed on the filter screen


34


. Thereafter, the inventory can be updated


146


preferably by updating and, if desired, storing the inventory database file.




In a preferred implementation of the method of this invention, to indicate that a plate has been put onto a particular refiner


32


or filter screen


34


, a pointing device is used to drag an icon of the plate from its inventory location over the particular refiner


32


or filter screen


34


where the plate was installed. Thereafter, the record for the particular refiner


32


or filter screen


34


is automatically updated to reflect the plate installed and the plate removed. Preferably, the plate removed automatically is transferred to another record that indicates the removed plate is no longer in use and is no longer part of the inventory. This record can be accessed through an icon, such as a garbage bin icon or the like, to enable an operator to see what plates have been removed from use and hence removed from inventory.




If for some other reason the inventory is being changed without installing a plate on a refiner


32


or a filter screen


34


, it is determined, as is indicated by reference numeral


162


, whether the plate selected from inventory is to be removed from the inventory. If so, the inventory is updated


146


by removing the selected plate and the inventory database file preferably is stored. However, if it is determined that no plate is being removed from inventory, the inventorying branch


118


is exited.




As is shown in

FIG. 8A

, it is determined, as is indicated by reference numeral


164


, whether inventory levels require replacement plates to be ordered. If so, as indicated by reference numeral


166


, an order is placed for replacement plates. If desired, after ordering has been completed, the inventorying branch


118


preferably can be exited.




One preferred implementation of a method of this invention for ordering plates is depicted by the flowchart of FIG.


9


. If it is determined that replacement plates are needed


164


, the supplier is contacted


168


, preferably using link


62


, and the plate order is submitted


170


by the host computer


46


. Thereafter, order confirmation


172


from the supplier preferably is received by the host computer


46


from the supplier computer


64


.




If desired, as is indicated by reference numeral


174


, the supplier order confirmation can be displayed on the host computer


46


or printed by a printing device or another display in communication with the host computer


46


. In a preferred implementation of a method of this invention, the link


62


is a telecommunications link with the plate order


170


sent by e-mail or preferably by an FTP link. Preferably, the order confirmation


172


is received in a like manner. Monitoring of each linked apparatus can and preferably does continue throughout inventory management and ordering.




In a preferred implementation of a method of this invention, ordering


166


is automatically performed after a change to inventory is made that requires the inventory to be replenished. Link


62


preferably is established through a modem or another similar device connected to the host computer


64


dialing up and establishing an FTP connection and submitting the order


170


by e-mail or by direct FTP contact with a website of the supplier, represented by supplier computer


64


. In this manner, the plate inventory can be advantageously be managed in a near real time manner.




In another preferred embodiment of the invention, each plate of the inventory and each apparatus are graphically displayed as an icon in a screen or window of the program. When a plate is installed on a particular apparatus, the icon representing that specific plate is dragged over the icon of the particular apparatus to automatically update


154


or


160


a record for that apparatus of what plate or plates were installed on the apparatus. The plate installed is automatically removed from inventory


146


and the plate removed from the apparatus is automatically removed from the record associated with the apparatus


152


or


158


. The inventory is then reviewed to determine if additional plates are needed


164


. If additional plates are needed, a link


62


is established with a computer or website of the supplier


64


and an order is placed


166


using the link


62


through an FTP connection or by e-mail. Where one supplier supplies refiner plates


36


and


38


and another supplier supplies screen plates


40


, the preferred implementation of the method contemplates automatically ordering in the above-described manner refiner plates


36


and


38


from the one supplier and screen plates


40


from the other supplier. In fact, the method of the invention contemplates providing the capability to order in an automated fashion refiner plates


36


and


38


from more than one supplier and screen plates


40


from more than one supplier.




It is also to be understood that, although the foregoing description and drawings describe and illustrate in detail preferred embodiments of the present invention, to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates, the present disclosure will suggest many modifications and constructions as well as widely differing embodiments and applications without thereby departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The present invention, therefore, is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. In a computer system which monitors operation of a disk refiner or a filter screen, a method of estimating about when a plate of the disk refiner or filter screen that processes a fibrous slurry should be replaced comprising the following steps performed by the computer system:a) receiving operating data pertaining to the operation of the disk refiner or the filter screen; and b) analyzing a set of the operating data relating to a period of at least about two hours of operation to determine whether the plate of the disk refiner or the filter screen should be replaced.
  • 2. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 wherein step b) comprises performing regression on the set of operating data to determine whether the plate of the disk refiner or the filter screen should be replaced.
  • 3. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 2 wherein the regression performed comprises linear regression.
  • 4. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 3 wherein operating data relating to one of quality, tensile index, tear index, fiber length, shive content, freeness, bulk, fiber distribution, axial thrust load, specific energy, disk gap, dilution, amount of generated steam, vibration, and pressure differential pertaining to operation of the disk refiner is received in step a).
  • 5. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 3 wherein operating data relating to one of quality, tensile index, tear index, fiber length, shive content, freeness, bulk, fiber distribution, axial thrust load, specific energy, disk gap, dilution, amount of generated steam, vibration, and pressure differential pertaining to operation of the disk refiner is analyzed in step b).
  • 6. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 3 wherein operating data relating to one of refiner motor power output, stock slurry flow, applied refiner plate force, refiner plate gap, dilution water flow, and consistency is received in step a).
  • 7. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 3 wherein operating data relating to one of stock slurry flow, pressure drop across the filter screen, consistency, and viscosity is received in step a).
  • 8. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 wherein step b) comprises performing a piecewise linearization of the set of data.
  • 9. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 1 wherein in step b) the set of the data comprises a set of data for a period of operation of the refiner of at least about one-hundred hours.
  • 10. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 9 wherein in step b) linear regression is performed to determine a slope of a line fitted to the set of operating data versus time and a recommendation is made to change the plate of the disk refiner if the slope is negative in the direction of increasing time.
  • 11. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) and about after when the plate is first installed on the refiner, 1) threshold data is received over a period of time of refiner operation, and 2) a threshold slope of a line fitted to the threshold data versus time is determined; in step b) an operating slope of a line fitted to the set of operating data versus time is determined; and a recommendation is made to change the plate of the disk refiner if the operating slope is not within about 10% of the threshold slope.
  • 12. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 11 wherein the threshold data pertains to operation of the refiner for a period of time of at least about twenty-four hours after the plate is first installed.
  • 13. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) and about after when the plate is first installed on the refiner, 1) threshold data is received over a period of time of refiner operation, and 2) a threshold slope of a line fitted to the threshold data versus time is determined; in step b) an operating slope of a line fitted to the set of operating data versus time is determined; and a recommendation is made to change the plate of the disk refiner if the operating slope is not within about 20% of the threshold slope.
  • 14. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) determining a threshold slope pertaining to prior operation of the refiner with the plate installed; and during step b) the steps comprising 1) determining an operating slope of the set of operating data versus time and 2) generating a recommendation to change the plate if the operating slope is not within about 10% of the threshold slope.
  • 15. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) determining a threshold slope pertaining to prior operation of the refiner with the plate installed; and during step b) the steps comprising 1) determining an operating slope of the set of operating data versus time and 2) generating a recommendation to change the plate if the operating slope is not within about 20% of the threshold slope.
  • 16. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 15 wherein the set of operating data analyzed in step b) relates to a period of at least about fifty hours of refiner operation with the plate installed.
  • 17. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner should be replaced as recited in claim 16 wherein the set of operating data analyzed in step b) relates to a period of no more than about two hundred hours of refiner operation with the plate installed.
  • 18. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 wherein in step b) the set of the data comprises a set of data for a period of operation of the filter screen of at least about eight hours.
  • 19. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 18 wherein in step b) linear regression is performed to determine a slope of a line fitted to the set of operating data versus time and a recommendation is made to change a plate of the filter screen if the slope is negative in the direction of increasing time.
  • 20. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) and after the plate is first installed on the filter screen, 1) threshold data is received over a period of time of filter screen operation, and 2) a threshold slope of a line fitted to the threshold data versus time is determined; in step b) an operating slope of a line fitted to the set of operating data versus time is determined; and a recommendation is made to change the plate of the filter screen if the operating slope is not within about 10% of the threshold slope.
  • 21. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 20 wherein the threshold data is received over a period of time of at least about four hours of operation after the plate is first installed.
  • 22. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:prior to step b) determining a threshold slope pertaining to prior operation of the filter screen with the plate installed; and during step b) determining an operating slope of the set of operating data versus time and generating a recommendation to change the plate if the operating slope is not within about 10% of the threshold slope.
  • 23. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 22 wherein the set of operating data analyzed in step b) relates to a period of no more than about ten hours of filter screen operation with the plate installed.
  • 24. A method of estimating about when a plate of a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 22 wherein the set of operating data analyzed in step b) relates to a period of no more than about eight hours of filter screen operation with the plate installed.
  • 25. A method of estimating about when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 wherein during or after step a) and before step b) the steps further comprising 1) storing at least some of the operating data, and 2) retrieving at least some of the stored operating data before performing step b).
  • 26. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 25 wherein the computer system has a display and the recommendation is shown on the display.
  • 27. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 1 further comprising:1) storing an inventory of plates for a disk refiner or a filter screen; 2) updating the inventory; and 3) determining whether to order plates to add to the inventory.
  • 28. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 27 wherein step 2) comprises:i) scanning a tag of a plate containing information relating to identification of the plate wherein scanning is performed remotely of the computer system; ii) storing the identification information; iii) transferring the information relating to identification of the plate to the computer system; and iv) adding the information relating to identification of the plate to the inventory.
  • 29. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 28 wherein scanning is performed by a portable input device.
  • 30. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 27 wherein if it is determined to order plates the following steps are performed:i) linking with a supplier computer system that is located remote from the computer system; and ii) submitting an order.
  • 31. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 30 wherein during step i) linking is accomplished by a telecommunications link and during step ii) the order is submitted by e-mail.
  • 32. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 30 wherein during step i) linking is accomplished by a telecommunications link and during step ii) the order is submitted by an FTP telecommunications link between the computer system and the supplier computer system.
  • 33. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 27 wherein there are a plurality of the disk refiners or the filter screens and further comprising:i) providing a record for each of the plurality of the disk refiners or the filter screens that stores each plate installed on each of the plurality of the disk refiners or the filter screens; ii) updating the record for a particular one of the disk refiners or the filter screens when the plate is removed and a new plate is installed to reflect the plate removed and the new plate installed.
  • 34. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 33 wherein during step 2) the inventory is updated to reflect the plate removed and the new plate installed and it is determined whether to determining whether to order a plate to add to the inventory in step 3).
  • 35. A method of determining when a plate of a disk refiner or a filter screen should be replaced as recited in claim 34 wherein it is determined whether to order a plate to add to the inventory in step 3) after the record is updated in step ii).
  • 36. In a computer system which monitors operation of a disk refiner or a filter screen having a plurality of pairs of sensors that sense data pertaining to the operation of the disk refiner or a filter screen, a method of determining when a plate of the disk refiner or filter screen that processes a fibrous slurry should be replaced comprising the following steps performed by the computer system:a) monitoring the plurality of pairs of sensors to obtain operating data pertaining to the operation of the disk refiner or the filter screen; b) storing at least some of the operating data; c) retrieving at least some of the operating data; d) determining a slope of a line fitted to a set of the operating data retrieved in step c); and e) generating a recommendation to replace the plate if the slope is negative.
  • 37. In a computer system which monitors operation of a disk refiner or a filter screen having a plurality of pairs of sensors that sense data pertaining to the operation of the disk refiner or a filter screen, a method of determining when a plate of the disk refiner or filter screen that processes a fibrous slurry should be replaced comprising the following steps performed by the computer system:a) monitoring the plurality of pairs of sensors to obtain operating data pertaining to the operation of the disk refiner or the filter screen; b) storing at least some of the operating data; c) retrieving at least some of the operating data; d) determining a slope of a line fitted to a set of the operating data retrieved in step c) e) comparing the slope to a threshold slope indicative of normal operation; and f) generating a recommendation to replace the plate if the slope is not within about 10% of the threshold slope.
US Referenced Citations (58)
Number Name Date Kind
RE. 36033 Kappel Jan 1999
3947668 Al-Shaikh et al. Mar 1976
4070761 Collins Jan 1978
4071451 Wood Jan 1978
4148439 Floden Apr 1979
4211324 Ohlbach Jul 1980
4268381 Hooper May 1981
4314878 Lee Feb 1982
4627578 Whyte Dec 1986
4661911 Ellery, Sr. Apr 1987
4730252 Bradshaw Mar 1988
4820980 Dodson-Edgars Apr 1989
4887208 Schneider et al. Dec 1989
4920488 Filley Apr 1990
4943347 Floden Jul 1990
4972318 Brown et al. Nov 1990
4994971 Poelstra Feb 1991
5009774 LaBlanc Apr 1991
5011090 Savonjousi Apr 1991
5016824 Pietinen et al. May 1991
5063380 Wakura Nov 1991
5064536 Bratten Nov 1991
5067660 Reinhall Nov 1991
5071514 Francis Dec 1991
5081039 Buttke et al. Jan 1992
5091713 Horne et al. Feb 1992
5105767 Gordon et al. Apr 1992
5222018 Sharpe et al. Jun 1993
5363812 Belin et al. Nov 1994
5425508 Chaney Jun 1995
5445295 Brown Aug 1995
5445328 Musselman Aug 1995
5475835 Hickey Dec 1995
5491340 Saarinen Feb 1996
5497314 Novak Mar 1996
5500735 Bentley et al. Mar 1996
5501491 Thompson Mar 1996
5504853 Schuur et al. Apr 1996
5524077 Faaland et al. Jun 1996
5526113 Lengyel et al. Jun 1996
5561707 Katz Oct 1996
5577239 Moore et al. Nov 1996
5586050 Makel et al. Dec 1996
5601192 Hutzler et al. Feb 1997
5605290 Brenholdt Feb 1997
5607587 Langner Mar 1997
5666493 Wojcik et al. Sep 1997
5684863 Katz Nov 1997
5698688 Smith et al. Dec 1997
5737393 Wolf Apr 1998
5747707 Johannson et al. May 1998
5758329 Wojcik et al. May 1998
5787156 Katz Jul 1998
5809479 Martin et al. Sep 1998
5813618 Prew Sep 1998
5823453 Garasimowicz Oct 1998
5936151 Hubbe Aug 1999
6092003 Hagart-Alexander et al. Jul 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 8301969 Jun 1983 WO