Social developments led to an increase of prenatal investigations. Amniocentesis or less frequently sampling of chorionic villi is performed in every tenth pregnancy for the prenatal analysis of, e.g. trisomy 21. The risk for a chromosomal defect increases with the age of the mother. This is why amniocentesis is performed in more than 50% of pregnant women aged 35 years or older. However, most children with chromosomal or genetic defects are still born by women under the age of 35, if the total number is taken into account. The probability for a trisomy 21 is 0.3% in fetuses of women aged 35 years and older. This has to be seen in the context of a 0.5% risk to induce an abortion by the amniocentesis procedure. From these numbers it is obvious that there is a great need for an alternative diagnostic procedure which yields the same results without bearing a risk for the unborn. One approach could be the isolation of fetal cells from maternal blood. This would eliminate risks for the fetus.
It was estimated that one fetal cell can be found in 105 to 107 maternal nucleated blood cells. Further investigations have shown, that in the presence of chromosomal aberrations more fetal cells can be detected in the maternal circulation.
This raises the chance to detect an aneuploid fetus by non-invasive procedures.
Three different types of fetal cells have been identified in maternal blood: lymphocytes, trophoblasts and nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs). Fetal lymphocytes have been detected still one to 5 years after childbirth. This longevity may interfere with the accurate diagnosis in following pregnancies.
Trophoblasts are attractive targets because they can be easily identified by their morphology. However, they can not be easily used for diagnostic purposes, because as placental cells they might differ from cells of the fetus: in about 1% of diagnosed chromosomal aberrations in trophoblasts the fetus turned out to be healthy.
Fetal nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) appear early in the maternal circulation, however do not persist after birth. Since they have a nucleus they are preferred candidates for chromosomal analysis. However, up to now they can not be distinguished easily and unambiguously from other blood cells. They are identified through a marker profile, which is characteristic for erythroid precursor cells and which is different from other blood cell subpopulations. Blood cells are extensively characterized by so-called clusters of differentiation (CD) markers as defined at the 7th Workshop and Conference on Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens (Harrogate 2000). Immature erythroid cells express CD71 and they lack CD45 which is expressed on leukocytes. This knowledge can be used to distinguish erythroid precursor cells from other mononuclear cells.
In order to isolate and identify fetal cells (1 amongst 105 to 107 maternal nucleated cells) most stringent criteria have to be met. There is no cell surface marker available yet which is exclusively expressed on fetal NRBCs. For the enrichment of fetal cells usually immunomagnetic or flow cytometric cell separation techniques are used either alone or in combination. The results of the chromosomal or genetic analysis of the isolated cells have been compared with the results obtained with amniotic cells. Many investigations have shown the technical feasibility of the non-invasive approach with large cohorts.
However, the existing procedures are still not suitable for routine diagnosis. It has to be assured that the cells under investigation are unambiguously fetal cells. The identification of fetal NRBCs can only be achieved by the recognition of a marker, which is preferentially expressed on fetal erythroid cells or which is expressed or localized in a way that is specific for fetal cells within the blood.
The lack of markers, which specifically identify fetal cells is the crucial obstacle for the development of a reliable non-invasive prenatal diagnostic.
The objective of this invention is the generation of antibodies, which allow the discrimination between fetal and adult erythroid cells and the unambiguous identification of fetal cells. Fetal cells recognized by these antibodies preferably should possess at least in part an intact cell nucleus, express the CD71 antigen and should miss the CD45 antigen in line with previously published results.
Further, the object of the invention is the generation of monoclonal antibodies, which react specifically with fetal cells as well as a hybridoma cell line, which produces such antibodies. This object is solved by the antibody according to embodiment 1, 7 or 10, the antigen according to claim 9 and the hybridoma cell according to embodiment 4 or 5. Further improvements of the antibodies, the hybridoma cell and the antigen are given in the embodiments 2-6, 8, and 11-16.
1. Monoclonal antibody reacting with a surface antigen present on fetal red blood cells including their nucleated precursor cells, but not with surface antigens on adult erythroid cells.
2. Antibody according to embodiment 1, characterized in that it reacts with most or all fetal erythroid cells, which express the CD71 antigen but are negative for CD45 antigen expression.
3. Antibody according to embodiment 1 or 2, characterized in that it reacts with fetal erythroid cells but not with the CD71 antigen.
4. Hybridoma cell producing monoclonal antibodies according to one of the preceding embodiments.
5. Hybridoma cell as deposited under accession number DSM ACC 2666 on Jul. 13, 2004 at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen GmbH in Braunschweig, Germany.
6. Hybridoma cell according to embodiments 4 and 5.
7. Antibody expressed by the hybridoma cell according to one of embodiments 4 to 6.
8. Antibody according to embodiment 7 and one of embodiments 1 to 3.
9. Surface antigen on fetal red blood cells recognized by a monoclonal antibody as characterized in one of embodiments 1 to 3 and 7 to 8.
10. Antibody characterized in that it recognizes or binds specifically to a surface antigen according to embodiment 9.
11. Use of a monoclonal antibody according to one of embodiments 1 to 3, 7, 8 or 10 for the detection and identification of fetal cells in a sample.
12. Use according to the preceding embodiment for the detection and identification of fetal cells in a sample of maternal blood.
13. Method for detection or identification of fetal cells in a sample, characterized by labeling said fetal cells by an antibody according to one of embodiments 1 to 3, 7, 8, or 10.
14. Method according to the preceding embodiment, characterized in that the sample is maternal blood or a sample of maternal blood.
15. Use of a method according to embodiments 13 or 14 for the detection of chromosomal and/or genetic aberrations, defects and/or variants in the fetal cells detected and identified by a method according to embodiment 13 to 14, characterized in that said fetal cells are subsequent to the detection and identification analyzed for a chromosomal and/or genetic aberration, defects and/or variant.
16. Use or method according to one of embodiments 11 to 15, characterized in that cells binding the monoclonal antibody are separated by flow cytometry, solid phase separation, immunomagnetic bead separation, panning on plastic surfaces, or the like.
For the purpose of the present invention 5 mice have been immunized with isolated erythroid cells from cord blood (CD71+, CD45−), which carried the “i” antigen as defined by the autoantibody described in DE 100 35 433 A1. The immunization with these cells opens the possibility that besides antibodies against the “i” antigen also antibodies with specificities against new markers could be generated, which could be used to identify erythroid precursor cells. The spleen cells of the immunized mice were fused with a myeloma cell line to produce hybridomas according to standard procedures (Schetters H, Production of Monoclonal Antibodies, in: Methods of Immunological Analysis, Masseyeff R F, Albert W H and Staines N A (Eds.) Vol. 2, Ch. 4.3, 230-245, VCH Weinheim, 1993).
In detail, mice were immunized with flow sorted human cord blood cells (CD71+, antigen-i+, CD19− and CD45−). Hybridoma supernatants were screened on pooled mononuclear cord blood cells, whereas the corresponding amount of erythroid precursors was determined by cytochemical staining of blood smears. For the hybridoma screening a six-parameter flow cytometric analysis (four colours, forward and side scatter) was set up for the simultaneous identification of erythroid precursor cells, leukocytes, enucleated erythrocytes and for antibodies reacting specifically with fetal cells. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analyses have been performed with fetal blood smears and fetal liver sections from the 6th up to 38th week of gestation as well as with adult blood, normal adult bone marrow and adult erythrocytes as controls.
A clone (accession number DSM ACC 2666 at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ)) with specificity for a surface antigen exclusively expressed on fetal erythroid cells has been identified. The new antibody showed unaltered binding to erythroid cells from fetal blood of early times of gestation (6th week) up to childbirth. Moreover, detailed examinations showed no surface reactivity with adult erythrocytes, erythroblasts or lymphatic and myeloid cells. This antibody did not react with cells of fetal haemolymphatic organs.
The investigation showed that the new monoclonal antibody binds specifically fetal erythroid cells and thus can differentiate between fetal and adult red blood cells. Because of the expression of this fetal antigen in early stages of gestation a non-invasive prenatal diagnostic may be feasible. This antibody can be applied for different enrichment techniques and/or for the identification of fetal erythroid cells.
Screening for Hybridomas Producing Antibodies Reacting Specifically with Fetal NRBCs
Since several thousand antibody producing hybridomas have to be screened to find a suitable clone a procedure has been set up permitting a high through-put whilst maintaining the required specificity. A six-parameter analysis (4 fluorescence channels, forward and side scatter) has been established, which enabled the simultaneous identification of erythroid precursor cells, the differentiation of leukocytes from enucleated erythrocytes and the identification of new antibodies in a single step. The analysed cells have been stained with a nucleic acid dye (LDS751, Molecular Probes, cat #7595) and have been incubated with antibodies of the cloned hybridomas. These antibodies were subjected to a reaction with an antibody directed against them, which was labeled with a fluorescent dye (FITC) (Goat anti mouse IgG (H+L)-FITC, Caltag Laboratories, cat #M35001). In later experiments for antibody characterization the antibodies have been labeled directly with FITC.
The identification of the erythroid precursor cells is possible due to their light scatter characteristics and by their binding of phycoerythrin labeled CD71 specific antibodies (CD71 PE, Diatec, cat #3212). Leukocytes could be discerned by their binding to allophycocyanin labeled CD45 specific antibodies (CD45 APC, BD Pharmingen, cat #555485). Nucleated and enucleated erythroid cells can be distinguished by their binding or absence of binding of the nucleic acid dye. With this procedure it is possible to identify antibodies binding to the intended target cells, i.e. fetal NRBCs, without cross-reaction towards adult erythrocytes or leukocytes (
Exclusion of Antibodies Reacting with Antigens on Adult Erythrocytes Including Common Blood Group Antigens
Blood group antigens can be found on adult erythrocytes and their precursors in large amounts. Therefore, they might induce a major immune response when used as antigens. Antibodies against these blood group antigens are not suitable for the identification of fetal cells. In order to exclude antibodies binding to antigens on adult erythrocytes including blood group antigens, their binding specificity towards fetal cells is investigated after absorption on erythrocytes. Erythrocyte with the blood group AB Rh+ have been harvested and stabilized with a reagent supplied by Meridian Diagnostics Europe, Bad Homburg. The antibodies under investigation have been incubated with increasing numbers of erythrocytes and tested before and afterwards for their binding activity for target cells. Reactivity of antibodies towards blood group antigens was thought to be absent, when the intensity of the binding to CD71+, CD45− nucleated erythroid precursor cells was unchanged after the incubation with the erythrocytes (
Hybridoma clone producing a monoclonal antibody of the IgM isotype showing the required binding characteristics in the screening procedure could be identified. It has the designation 4B9 and was deposited by the applicant of the present patent or patent application on Jul. 13, 2004 at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ, Braunschweig) under the accession number DSM ACC 2666. A second antibody 4B8 recognizing the same epitope is mentioned in
Fetal and adult erythroblasts strongly and specifically express glycophorin-A and, therefore, can be identified through this marker protein. The binding of the monoclonal antibody to these cells was visualized by an immunofluorescence double stain.
An immunoenzymatic method has also been used:
Negative controls: monoclonal antibody of identical isotype or murine hyper-immune serum.
Exclusion of Antibodies Reacting with CD71
Antibodies generated with the immunization strategy used may be directed against CD71. To exclude these antibodies, analyses were performed that show whether CD71-antibodies compete for the same binding site. Biotinylated antibody 4B8 was pre-incubated with mononuclear cells from cord blood. Then unlabeled CD71-specific antibody (Anti-CD71, Clone DF1513, DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany) was added. After streptavidin-DTAF-labeling it was analyzed by flow cytometry whether CD71-antibodies had replaced the antibody 4B8. As a positive control sample for this competition experiment, unlabeled antibody 4B8 was added instead of CD71. These analyses showed that antibodies 4B8 and CD71 do not compete for the same epitope whereas the addition of unlabeled antibody 4B8 had diminished the signal.
In the following,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
040078445 | Mar 2004 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/721,464, filed Apr. 15, 2022, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/466,337, filed Sep. 3, 2021, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/157,326, filed Jan. 25, 2021, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/931,178, filed May 13, 2020, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/584,986, filed Sep. 27, 2019, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/270,892, filed Feb. 8, 2019, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/012,923, filed Jun. 20, 2018, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/802,691, filed Nov. 3, 2017, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/469,628, filed Mar. 27, 2017, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/242,630, filed Aug. 22, 2016, now abandoned, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/882,995, filed Oct. 14, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,453,841, issued Sep. 27, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/028,027, filed Sep. 16, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,194,871, issued Nov. 24, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/979,535, filed Dec. 28, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,536,312, issued Sep. 17, 2013, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/599,512, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,858,757, issued Dec. 28, 2010, which is a national stage application of international application No. PCT/EP2005/003371, filed Mar. 31, 2005, which claims priority to European application no. 04007811.5 filed Mar. 31, 2004, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14882995 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15242630 | US | |
Parent | 10599512 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12979535 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17721464 | Apr 2022 | US |
Child | 17989895 | US | |
Parent | 17466337 | Sep 2021 | US |
Child | 17721464 | US | |
Parent | 17157326 | Jan 2021 | US |
Child | 17466337 | US | |
Parent | 15931178 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17157326 | US | |
Parent | 16584986 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 15931178 | US | |
Parent | 16270892 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 16584986 | US | |
Parent | 16012923 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16270892 | US | |
Parent | 15802691 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16012923 | US | |
Parent | 15469628 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 15802691 | US | |
Parent | 15242630 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 15469628 | US | |
Parent | 14028027 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14882995 | US | |
Parent | 12979535 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14028027 | US |