This application is a Section 371 National Stage Application of International Application PCT/EP2011/058811 filed May 30, 2011 and published as WO2012/163394 A1 in English.
The discussion below is merely provided for general background information and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The invention relates to a mooring assembly for a vessel, comprising a moonpool defined in the vessel, a turret rotatably mounted within the moonpool by means of an upper main bearing for transmitting horizontal and vertical loads between the vessel and turret and by means of a lower secondary bearing for substantially transmitting horizontal loads between the vessel and the turret, and mooring lines attached to the lower region of the turret.
Ideally the lower secondary bearing transmits the major part of the mooring forces (which are caused by the mooring lines) in a horizontal direction to the vessel. Practically, however, it is difficult to avoid that a substantial part of these forces are reacted by the upper main bearing, causing severe stresses, particularly in the turret and in the upper main bearing.
One suggested solution for this problem is to decrease the diameter of at least a lower part of the turret such as to reduce its resistance against bending. As a result the turret may bend under horizontal mooring forces, causing the lower secondary bearing to transmit most of the horizontal loads. A disadvantage, however, is that such a reduction of diameter of the turret reduces the available space for risers (or other elements such as, for example, a disconnectable buoy member) Further such a reduction of diameter may decrease the ability of the turret to transmit circumferential loads.
This Summary and the Abstract herein are provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary and the Abstract are not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor are they intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. The claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in the Background
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the mooring assembly includes a turret that at its lower region comprises a number of circumferentially spaced torsion box like torsion members each extending substantially vertically between an upper end attached to the turret and a lower free end, which torsion members have a resistance against bending that in a circumferential direction is greater than in a radial direction, wherein the mooring lines are attached to said torsion members near said lower free ends and wherein the lower secondary bearing is defined by outwardly facing bearing members attached to said torsion members and an inwardly facing bearing ring attached to the moonpool, and wherein in a situation in which a torsion member is not loaded horizontally by a respective mooring line its bearing member does not engage the bearing ring.
The torsion members offers a simple design, however combined with the provision of flexibility which at one hand allows the torsion members to bend outwardly into contact with the bearing ring (avoiding the transmission of horizontal loads to the upper main bearing) and at the other hand offers sufficient rigidity in the circumferential direction to transmit circumferential loads to the turret (and to whatever constructional and/or operational parts supported thereby). Because, further, this design does not require a reduction of the diameter of any part of the turret, the available space for risers is optimised. The torsion box design results in a torsion stiffness which ensures full contact between the bearing members and effectively avoids undesired phenomena, such as fretting between the bearing members and the bearing ring due to dynamic stick-slip effects. As a result the bearing members and bearing ring are maintained in full engagement.
The gap present between a bearing member and the bearing ring in a situation in which a torsion member is not loaded horizontally by a respective mooring line moreover allows hogging and sagging of the vessel with a resulting change of the gap dimension without effecting the horizontal load distribution over the upper main bearing and the lower secondary bearing.
In one embodiment of the mooring assembly, the torsion members taper in a vertical direction, for example upwardly. Such a taper allows the mooring assembly, and specifically the turret, to be optimised, both in a constructional and spatial sense.
In another embodiment of the mooring assembly the ratio between the resistance of the torsion members against bending in a circumferential direction and in a radial direction is at least five.
There are several possibilities for controlling the manner in which the torsion members will bend when loaded. For example it is possible that the spacing between successive torsion members have different lengths and/or widths.
In yet another embodiment of the mooring assembly, the bearing members are friction pads.
In an embodiment of the mooring assembly, the lower secondary bearing is located at the lower free ends of the torsion members wherein the position where the mooring lines are attached to the turret substantially is located at the same level. Thus the mooring lines engage the torsion members near to the lower secondary bearing, such that mooring loads are almost directly directed to the lower secondary bearing without loading the turret in an excessive manner.
However, alternatively it is possible that the lower secondary bearing is located above the lower free ends of the torsion members at a higher level than the position where the mooring lines are attached to the turret. In such a case the torsion members must be sufficiently flexible to be moved radially outward when loaded, but also sufficiently rigid to prevent an engagement between the lowermost part of a torsion member (below said secondary bearing) and the moonpool.
It is also possible that the torsion members have different cross sections, for example when one expects the mooring assembly to be loaded in an asymmetrical manner (caused, for example, by a predominant direction of a sea current or wind).
Finally an embodiment of the mooring assembly is mentioned in which the turret comprises a lower turret section and an upper turret section and wherein the lower turret section is detachable from the upper turret section. For example the lower turret section may be part of or may define a detachable buoy member which may support the risers.
Hereinafter aspects of the invention will be elucidated while referring to the drawing, in which
Firstly referring to
As may appear more clearly from
Mooring lines 6 are attached to said torsion members 7 near said lower free ends of the torsion members 7.
The lower secondary bearing 5 is defined by outwardly facing bearing members 8 attached to said lower free ends of the torsion members 7 and an inwardly facing bearing ring 9 attached to the wall of the moonpool 2. Preferably the bearing members 8 are friction pads. In a situation in which a torsion member 7 is not loaded horizontally by a respective mooring line 6 (as illustrated in
Torsion of the torsion members 7 is avoided because of the torsion box design. This maintains a full engagement between the bearing members 8 and bearing ring 9.
As appears clearly from
The length of the spacing 10 may differ from what has been illustrated. Moreover some spacings may have different lengths and/or widths.
The torsion members 7, which define torsion boxes comprising among others (in a known manner and thus not further elucidated here) opposite wall sections and internal stiffening members, 12 one of which is shown cross-hatched, may taper vertically, for example upwardly, as illustrated by the dotted outline of a tapering torsion member 7′ in
The turret 3 may comprise a lower turret section 3′ and an upper turret section 3″ (see
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above which may be varied widely within the scope of the invention as defined by the attached claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/058811 | 5/30/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/31/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/163394 | 12/6/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4305341 | Stafford | Dec 1981 | A |
4701143 | Key | Oct 1987 | A |
4841895 | Brewerton | Jun 1989 | A |
4955310 | Pollack | Sep 1990 | A |
5065689 | Krogstad | Nov 1991 | A |
5178087 | O'Nion et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5381750 | Pollack | Jan 1995 | A |
5893784 | Boatman | Apr 1999 | A |
6708639 | Cottrell et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7225749 | Boatman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20020073906 | Hobdy | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040261683 | Lindblade | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050061224 | Boatman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0259072 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0656293 | Jun 1995 | EP |
8706555 | Nov 1987 | WO |
8903338 | Apr 1989 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/058811, May 30, 2012 in the European Patent Office. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140216322 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |