1. Field of the Invention
The field of the present invention is mortar packages and methods of using mortar packages, particularly for masonry construction.
2. Background
Masonry elements, such as stone walls, serve many practical purposes and can add value to a property. For example, when stones or bricks are used to form a retaining wall, a property owner can change the landscape of a sloping yard into one that is more functional. Walls can serve as demarcation lines that define the boundaries of a property. In addition, walls may improve aesthetics or visual interest of a property.
Dry stacking is one method of building a stone wall. A dry-stacked retaining wall is built by vertically stacking stones of various width, length, and thickness. As the stones are stacked, crevices between the stones are filled with sand, gravel, and smaller stones. Gravity and friction hold the stones together, usually without any type of mortar or adhesive or additional reinforcement. Stacking stones is labor intensive. As a wall is built, smaller rocks typically are broken off from larger stones and shaped to fit in gaps in the wall for leveling purposes.
Over time, however, the stones used to build dry-stacked walls shift from their initial positions. This shifting is worsened by weather effects (e.g., rain, snow, wind) and other stressors that loosen the sand, gravel, and small stones positioned in crevices in the dry stacked wall. Although some open crevices are acceptable for water drainage purposes, these crevices will eventually enlarge and adversely affect the structural integrity of the wall.
To deter the shifting and movement of stones many professional contractors reinforce the interior of walls with mortar. Using mortar only on surfaces of stones that are placed within interior portions of the wall can preserve the exterior look of a dry-stacked stone wall. Unfortunately, applying mortar to the interior of the wall is at least a two-person or more person job. In the case of two persons or more, one person continuously mixes and prepares mortar slurry for application, while at least one other person stacks stones to form the wall and applies the mortar as it is needed.
Conventional methods of dry stacking and reinforcing masonry walls can be improved upon. Dry-stacked stone walls will at some point require reinforcement because of the shifting and movement of stones. But the methods of addressing these problems require at least two people and are labor intensive. For these reasons, among others, there is a clear need for improved masonry construction methods. The present invention fulfills this need and provides further related advantages, as described in the following summary.
The present invention is directed towards mortar packages and methods of using mortar packages for masonry construction. Instead of conventionally stacking stones to form dry-stacked stone walls and reinforcing these walls with sand, gravel, small stones, and/or concrete, mortar packages are positioned between masonry construction elements. Mortar packages may be shaped or compressed when installed to better level and stablize wall surfaces.
A mortar package includes an outer covering, having a porous outer surface. Incorporated into or on the porous outer surface is an adhesive. A mortar mixture, which is preferably dry, is held within and covered by the outer covering. Both the adhesive and the mortar mixture preferably are activated by a liquid (e.g. water), where the term “activated” is defined herein as the setting of product constituents for bonding purposes.
A more complete understanding of various configurations of the mortar packages and single-person methods of using mortar packages will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by consideration of the following detailed description. Reference will be made to the appended sheets which will first be described briefly.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Like element numerals may be used to indicate like elements appearing in one or more of the figures.
Turning in detail to the drawings,
The outer covering 12 may have various configurations. For example, as shown in
Each type of outer covering configuration includes a porous outer surface 14, optionally having an adhesive 16 incorporated therein or applied thereon. The outer covering may, for example, be manufactured from one or more woven fiber-based fabrics. Preferably, the material is biodegradable, such that it disintegrates over time without negative environmental consequences.
Burlap is one type of fiber-based fabric material that may be used for the outer covering. It is eco-friendly, porous and biodegradable. The adhesive 16 may be incorporated in or on the outer surface. The porous outer surface 14 has sufficient porosity such that a wetting or activation liquid, such as water, may penetrate through the outer surface and into the interior of the mortar package.
The adhesive 16, which optionally is incorporated into the outer surface 14, is liquid-activated (preferably water-activated) and capable of bonding to stone, block and brick materials. The adhesive provides an additional way to reinforce a masonry structure, beyond the use of adhesives and mortar mixtures used alone. Adhesive types include, but are not limited to adhesives that are resin-based and water-based or water-soluble. Representative adhesives include moisture curing adhesives such as cyanoacrylates, urethanes, rubber cements, glues or polyvinyl acetate dispersions, and pressure sensitive adhesives such as acrylate based polymers. Bioadhesives also may be used. One suitable adhesive is High Tack Fish Glue (CAS#9000-70-8) from Norland Products, Inc. of Cranbury, N.J.
A mortar mixture 20 is held or disposed within the inner volume defined by the outer covering 12, and is covered by the outer covering 12, as particularly shown in
The cross-sectional view of the wall shown in
The cross-sectional view of the wall shown in
Together, the optional adhesive 16 and the mortar mixture 20 of the mortar packages bond masonry construction elements 40 to one another. There is advantage to the combination of adhesive 16 and mortar mixture 20 where an adhesive may be selected to more rapidly set and secure the mortar package to the masonry elements, giving time for the mortar mixture to cure. As such, mortar packages 10, 11 may be used to form walls with increased strength, compared to those which use adhesives or mortar alone. These walls are also less susceptible to weather damage and more resistant to other damage.
The mortar packages 10, 11 when installed may act as a balancer or anti-rock dampener to keep the masonry construction elements 40, particularly those with irregular surfaces such as stones, from rocking or working loose from the wall or other masonry structure.
While embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2784131 | Fletcher, Jr. | Mar 1957 | A |
2917223 | Le Bolt et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
3283992 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3374635 | Crandall | Mar 1968 | A |
3425228 | Lamberton | Feb 1969 | A |
3438207 | Turzillo | Apr 1969 | A |
3474626 | Colle | Oct 1969 | A |
3670504 | Hayes et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3786640 | Turzillo | Jan 1974 | A |
3886751 | Porraz Jimenez Labora | Jun 1975 | A |
3890802 | Auriat et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3922832 | Dicker | Dec 1975 | A |
4061825 | Counsell et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4449847 | Scales et al. | May 1984 | A |
4486121 | Thompson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4502815 | Scales et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4690585 | Holmberg | Sep 1987 | A |
4919567 | Sample | Apr 1990 | A |
5158395 | Holmberg | Oct 1992 | A |
5584599 | Knittel | Dec 1996 | A |
5934027 | Khalili | Aug 1999 | A |
6132780 | Archibald et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6378272 | Archibald et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6471402 | Burns | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491431 | Merten | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6944998 | King | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7083364 | Kim | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7214002 | Laine | May 2007 | B2 |
7452164 | Kim | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7677841 | Shin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7765774 | Mandzsu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8196370 | Scheckler | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8235631 | Adams et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8371772 | Chang | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8602692 | Adams et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020090265 | Merten | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100241 | Rygiel | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050011144 | Laine | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070196176 | Laine | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080016825 | Mandzsu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080101862 | Mountain | May 2008 | A1 |
20080247685 | Kim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090304458 | Chang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100170960 | Barnhill | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100254636 | Elkhouli | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293849 | Chang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110103900 | Adams et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120117739 | Cook | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180435 | Stelluti | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195695 | Adams et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238163 | Scherer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120261278 | Mandzsu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |