Motor boat with foils which are retractable by tilting

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11577806
  • Patent Number
    11,577,806
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 12, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 14, 2023
    a year ago
  • Inventors
    • Rozand; Arthur
    • Lukowski; Alaric
    • Dyen; Stéphane
  • Original Assignees
    • ENATA INVESTMENT CORPORATION PTE. LTD.
  • Examiners
    • Polay; Andrew
    Agents
    • Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.
Abstract
Motor boat comprising a support structure and at least one pair of similar foils arranged on each side of the support structure, each of said foils being defined by a wing and its support; the latter being retractable into the lower part of the structure and mounted so as to be slidable relative thereto; said foils being arranged so as to adopt at least two fixed positions, namely an “active” position in which they are deployed in similar positions and a “passive” position in which said supports are retracted into the support structure; characterized in that the boat is adapted such that the deployment of the foils comprises an initial movement of the supports in a substantially horizontal direction away from the vertical median plane of the support structure, followed by a tilting about an axis parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the boat.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a United States national stage application of International patent application PCT/IB2018/056975 filed on Sep. 12, 2018 designating the United States, and claims foreign priority to European patent application EP 17193090.2 filed on Sep. 26, 2017, the contents of both documents being herewith incorporated by reference in their entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to motorized boats with foils.


PRIOR ART

The principle consisting in balancing the weight of a boat by a hydrodynamic lift effect produced by the speed of the water acting on elements in the form of wings that are submerged, semi-submerged or traverse the surface of the water, as opposed to using the Archimedean effect of submerged volumes alone, is relatively old. From the start of the twentieth century there have been motor boats equipped with this kind of device known as a foil. Additionally known is the use of foils with the aim of stabilizing vessels in terms of rolling or pitching in Archimedean configuration. The use of foils improves the performance of boats by increasing the speed and/or reducing energy consumption.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,810 discloses a motor boat equipped with foils.


In this boat, and more generally in motorized boats with foils, the position of the foils with respect to the bearing structure does not vary, whether the boat is at a standstill, is moving at a low or high speed or whether the force of the wind or the height of the waves is pronounced or not.


Other patents, such as U.S. Pat. No. 3,241,511, disclose principles of motor boats with foils with a system for the retractability of the foils by means of vertical sliding or by various rotation mechanisms. These systems make it possible in particular to relatively reduce the overall size and drag of the appendages when they are not used.


Patent application WO 2016/009409 discloses a principle making it possible to satisfy two precise distinct geometric configurations, namely (i) the coincidence with the shape of the hull of the foils in the raised position, and (ii) the positioning of the foils in the low position which makes it possible to naturally obtain the autostability of the hydrofoil in flight, be it in rolling or in pitching.


Patent application WO 2016/0094090 discloses a principle making it possible to satisfy two precise distinct geometric configurations, namely (i) the coincidence with the shape of the hull of the foils in the raised position, and (ii) the positioning of the foils in the low position which makes it possible to naturally obtain the autostability of the hydrofoil in flight, be it in rolling or in pitching.


However, the prior art devices do not allow the foils to be both above the waterline in the passive position, optimally integrated into the bearing structure, and sufficiently spaced apart in the active position, e.g. by at least twice the width of the boat. Such an arrangement would have the merit of increasing the natural stability of the boat while minimizing the overall size of the foils in the passive position.







DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention notably offers the advantage of remedying the problem described in the previous chapter.


Generally speaking, it consists in initially deploying the foils along a substantially horizontal trajectory and then tilting them in the direction of the body of water.


The invention relates more precisely to a motor boat including a bearing structure and at least one pair of similar foils arranged one on each side of the bearing structure, each of said foils being defined by a wing and its support; the latter being retractable into the lower part of the structure and mounted so as to be slidable relative thereto; said foils being arranged so as to adopt at least two fixed positions, namely a position referred to as the “active” position in which they are deployed in similar positions and a position referred to as the “passive” position in which said supports are retracted into the bearing structure; characterized in that the boat is adapted so that the deployment of the foils comprises an initial displacement of the supports in a substantially horizontal direction which diverges from the vertical median plane of the bearing structure followed by tilting about an axis parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the boat.


By “substantially horizontal direction” must be understood a rectilinear trajectory that is horizontal or almost horizontal, a trajectory that is slightly curved but almost merges with a horizontal direction, or any other trajectory that is a projection of a horizontal direction.


It should be noted that the invention offers in particular the advantage of reducing the overall size of the foils as they can be positioned under the deck of the boat.


According to another embodiment of the invention, the foils are guided by two blocks that are adapted to allow the passage of sails of varying chord and twist. Advantageously, the system for mechanically raising the foils comprises a screw jack simultaneously secured to the bearing structure and to the foil.


Generally speaking, the mechanism for deployment of the foils described in the present patent application can be combined with all the other features described in the patent application WO 2016/009409, in particular the dynamic simulator.


The figure shows an embodiment in which the foils are similar but not symmetrically identical. The supports 4 are slightly asymmetrical so that in the passive position they can be stacked in the bearing structure 1. The figure illustrates three positions 2, 2′,2″ of the foils, i.e. the passive position 2, a transient position 2′ and the active position 2″.


In the passive position, the wings 3 merge with the side walls of the bearing structure 1.


In the active position, the distance between the ends of the wings 3″ is at least equivalent to twice the width of the bearing structure 1.


During the deployment phase, the foils 2, 2′,2″ initially move along a slightly curved trajectory which diverges from the vertical median plane 5 of the bearing structure 1. There follows tilting of the foils 2′,2″ around an axis 6 directed in a direction parallel to the main axis of the boat. During this tilting, the free end 8 of each support 4 also undergoes rotation about the axis 6.


It goes without saying that the invention is not limited to the examples described and illustrated in this document. It covers any mechanism as defined in the claims allowing the position of the foils to be modified when sailing.


NUMERICAL REFERENCES USED IN THE FIGURE






    • 1 Bearing structure


    • 2 Foil in passive position


    • 2′ Foil in transient position


    • 2″ Foil in active position


    • 3 Wing in passive position


    • 3′ Wing in transient position


    • 3″ Wing in active position


    • 4 Support in passive position


    • 4′ Support in transient position


    • 4″ Support in active position


    • 5 Vertical median plane


    • 6 Tilt axis


    • 7 Support fee end


    • 8 Support free end trajectory




Claims
  • 1. A foil boat having a main axis in a driving direction comprising: a boat hull; anda pair of foils arranged one on each side of the boat hull, each foil of the pair of foils including a wing and a support,wherein each support is slidable relative to the boat hull, and at least partially retractable into the boat hull, such that the pair of foils are configured to adopt a first, active position where the pair of foils are deployed in similar positions, and a second, passive position in which each support is at least partially retracted into the boat hull, andwherein a displacement of the pair of foils from the second, passive position to the first active position includes an initial sliding displacement of each support in a direction away from the boat hull, the direction diverging from a vertical median plane of the boat hull, followed by rotation motion about an axis that is parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the foil boat, such that an angle of the wings increase relative to the vertical median plane to move the wings closer to a horizontal position,wherein the pair of the foils are deployed asymmetrically.
  • 2. A foil boat having a main axis in a driving direction comprising: a boat hull; anda pair of foils arranged one on each side of the boat hull, each foil of the pair of foils including a wing and a support,wherein each support is slidable relative to the boat hull, and at least partially retractable into the boat hull, such that the pair of foils are configured to adopt a first, active position where the pair of foils are deployed in similar positions, and a second, passive position in which each support is at least partially retracted into the boat hull, andwherein a displacement of the pair of foils from the second, passive position to the first, active position includes an initial sliding displacement of each support in a direction away from the boat hull, the direction diverging from a vertical median plane of the boat hull, followed by rotation motion about an axis that is parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the foil boat, such that an angle of the wings increase relative to the vertical median plane to move the wings closer to a horizontal position,wherein the direction of the initial sliding displacement away from the boat hull forms a curved trajectory.
  • 3. The foil boat as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the second, passive position, each wing is arranged to be parallel to a side wall of the boat hull.
  • 4. A method for deploying the pair of foils of the foil boat as defined in claim 1, including the steps of: initially displacing each support away from the boat hull in the direction that diverges from the vertical median plane of the boat hull; androtating each one of the pair of foils about an axis that is parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the foil boat.
  • 5. A foil boat having a main axis in a driving direction comprising: a boat hull; anda pair of foils arranged one on each side of the boat hull, each foil of the pair of foils including a wing and a support,wherein each support is slidable relative to the boat hull, and at least partially retractable into the boat hull, such that the pair of foils are configured to adopt a first, active position where the pair of foils are deployed in similar positions, and a second, passive position in which each support is at least partially retracted into the boat hull, andwherein a displacement of the pair of foils from the second, passive position to the first, active position includes an initial sliding displacement of each support in a direction away from the boat hull, the direction diverging from a vertical median plane of the boat hull, followed by rotation motion about an axis that is parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the foil boat, such that an angle of the wings increase relative to the vertical median plane to move the wings closer to a horizontal position,wherein the support of each one of the foils has a curved shape, and the direction of the initial sliding displacement of the support away from the boat hull forms a curved trajectory along the curved shape of the support.
  • 6. A foil boat having a main axis in a driving direction comprising: a boat hull; anda pair of foils arranged one on each side of the boat hull, each foil of the pair of foils including a wing and a support,wherein each support is slidable relative to the boat hull, and at least partially retractable into the boat hull, such that the pair of foils are configured to adopt a first, active position where the pair of foils are deployed in similar positions, and a second, passive position in which each support is at least partially retracted into the boat hull, andwherein a displacement of the pair of foils from the second, passive position to the first, active position includes an initial sliding displacement of each support in a direction away from the boat hull, the direction diverging from a vertical median plane of the boat hull, followed by rotation motion about an axis that is parallel or substantially parallel to the main axis of the foil boat, such that an angle of the wings increase relative to the vertical median plane to move the wings closer to a horizontal position,wherein the support is not movable relative to the wing of each one of the foils.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
17193090 Sep 2017 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2018/056975 9/12/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/064106 4/4/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (27)
Number Name Date Kind
2984197 Bader May 1961 A
2991747 Bader Jul 1961 A
3081728 Wilterdink et al. Mar 1963 A
3099239 Von Schertel Jul 1963 A
3150626 Irgens Sep 1964 A
3241511 Drtina Mar 1966 A
3345968 Bailey Oct 1967 A
3763811 Danahy Oct 1973 A
4058076 anahy Nov 1977 A
4237810 Westfall Dec 1980 A
4955312 Magazzu Sep 1990 A
5054410 Scarborough Oct 1991 A
5329870 Cook Jul 1994 A
5988097 Karney et al. Nov 1999 A
6095076 Nesbitt Aug 2000 A
6499419 Bussard Dec 2002 B1
6782839 Nozaki Aug 2004 B1
7644672 Welbourn Jan 2010 B2
8201514 Cales Jun 2012 B2
8720354 Ketterman et al. May 2014 B2
8967063 Coffman Mar 2015 B2
10532793 Lagarrigue et al. Jan 2020 B2
20090013917 Ulgen Jan 2009 A1
20120255479 Sahlin Oct 2012 A1
20120325135 Ketterman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20140109820 Kormann Apr 2014 A1
20170036739 Schnauffer Feb 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
2004479 Dec 2008 EP
2894090 Jul 2015 EP
3216689 Sep 2017 EP
20160000507 Feb 2016 KR
WO 2016009409 Jan 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2018 for Application No. PCT/IB2018/056975.
International Written Oppinion dated Dec. 14, 2018 for Application No. PCT/IB2018/056975.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200247505 A1 Aug 2020 US