Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The field of the invention is control systems for controlling the operation of AC motors.
Motors are often used for providing lifting or hoisting power for a load. These loads are often held by a mechanical brake when stopped. Several problems arise in controlling such a load. First, there is a need to bring the load to a stop at a precise height, in the case of an elevator for example. Second, there is a need to detect any brake slippage, which can be the result of mechanical wear on the brake or other factors.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,457,372, discloses a braking method for stopping a hoist motor in which there is a power sensing circuit for sensing the power applied in stopping a load and storing a sampling signal. The basic braking method uses DC current (zero frequency current) that is injected into the stator windings of an AC motor. This produces a stationary magnetic field in the motor air gap to oppose rotation. This basic stopping technique is modified by utilizing the sampling signal. This method does not address the problems of mechanical wear on the brake as discussed above.
The invention relates a method and apparatus for A method for stopping an AC motor that is controlling a load while detecting mechanical brake slippage of a mechanical brake for holding the load against movement, by decreasing torque-producing current commands from the drive while a speed regulator is commanding zero speed, by sensing movement of the load while the speed regulator is commanding zero speed, by detecting movement of the load past a pre-determined distance limit, and by increasing torque to support the load and prevent further movement of the load.
The invention decreases torque-producing current commands from the drive while a speed regulator is commanding zero speed. If the brake is not functioning properly, the motor will start to turn when the torque limit is less than the load torque required to hold the load. During reduction of the commanded torque, position feedback is monitored to detect a movement of the shaft and load that indicates mechanical brake slippage. If the change in position exceeds a defined number of brake slip counts before the control reaches zero torque, an alarm condition is signaled.
When an alarm condition is signaled, the load is allowed to move a programmed distance and then torque limit is substantially increased up to its initial value to hold the load at zero speed and against further slippage. The cycle of decreasing the torque limit, allowing the load to move and stopping the movement continues until the movement of the load stops when the drive removes all torque. This indicates that the load is in a safe position, because the load has been lowered to the ground, or a counterweight has been lowered to the ground and the motor shaft is no longer moving with zero torque applied. At this point the motor control will shut off and the alarm condition will cause start signals to be ignored until power is removed and the brake is serviced. Before shutting off, the operator is allowed to enter a run mode to manually raise or lower the load before shutting off.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description that follows and from the drawings which illustrate embodiments of the invention, and which are incorporated herein by reference.
As seen in
As further seen in
The PWM inverter 11 receives power from a DC bus 15, which receives power from an AC source 16 that is rectified by rectifier 17 to provide DC voltage on the DC bus 15. A capacitor 18 (here specify function of the capacitor.) Execution of program instructions in the control program 19 results in current commands in the d-q reference frame, Iq Ref (torque command) and Id Ref (field flux command). The torque command Iq Ref is multiplied by an adjustable gain function (GAIN) to produce a slip frequency command (fs). This slip frequency command (fs) is integrated, as represented by the “1/s” function to provide a slip angle command (θs) for a motor controlled in accordance with vector control theory. In vector control, the vector control commands are resolved along a d-axis and a q-axis, where the q-axis commands represent the vector multiplied by the sin θ and d-axis commands represent the torque vector multiplied by the cos θ. For further information of vector control theory, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,248, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
The encoder 10 is a speed/position feedback device, which provides a position feedback signal (θr) responsive to the speed of the motor 12. This is summed with the commanded slip frequency/position (θs) to provide a resultant torque angle command (θ). This represents a typical motor control with speed feedback. The position feedback signal (θr) is also made available to the control program 19 as part of the speed regulator and to detect mechanical brake slippage.
The execution of the control program 19 also provides a Current Regulator loop 21 in which current commands in the d-q reference frame, Iq Ref and Id Ref are algebraically summed (actually, by subtracting) feedback signals Iq Fdbk and Id Fdbk, which are the result of processing feedback signals, Ia Fdbk, Ib Fdbk and Ic Fdbk through a 3-phase to 2-phase converter 22. This produces two differences that are processed through respective PI (proportional-integrator) control loops to produce, Vq and Vd commands to a 2-phase to 3-phase converter 23. This converter 23 also receives the torque angle command (θ) and together with the Vq and Vd commands, produces the phase voltage outputs Va, Vb and Vc to the PWM inverter 11.
According to the invention, if it is now desired to stop the motor 12 and the load 7, while checking for any mechanical slippage before turning off torque-producing current to the motor 12. A program routine represented by the flow chart in
Referring to
In the event that mechanical brake slippage is detected in decision block 38, then a brake alarm is actuated as represented by process block 39. Then brake slippage is monitored again as represented by decision block 40, and if continue slippage is detected, torque is increased to hold the load against further movement against the brake as represented by process block 42. If motor movement has stopped prior to exiting via block 40 as detected by executing decision block 41, then the routine will proceed to block 42 and then will loop until torque is decremented to zero by executing process block 35. The routine will then shut-off the drive.
The invention decreases torque-producing current commands from the drive while the speed regulator is commanding zero speed. If the brake is not functioning properly, the motor will start to turn when the torque limit is less than the load torque required to hold the load. During reduction of the commanded torque, position feedback is monitored to detect movement of the shaft and load indicating mechanical brake slippage. If the change in position exceeds the defined number of brake slip counts before the control reaches zero torque, an alarm condition is signaled.
When an alarm condition is signaled, the load is allowed to move a programmed distance and then torque limit is substantially increased up to its initial value to hold the load at zero speed and against further slippage. The cycle of decreasing the torque limit, allowing the load to move and stopping the movement continues until the movement of the load stops when the drive removes all torque. This indicates that the load is in a safe position, because the load has been lowered to the ground, or a counterweight has been lowered to the ground and the motor shaft is no longer moving with zero torque applied. At this point the motor control will shut off and the alarm condition will cause start signals to be ignored until power is removed and the brake is serviced. Before shutting off, the operator is allowed to enter a run mode to manually raise or lower the load before shutting off.
This has been a description of a preferred embodiment of the invention. It will be apparent that various modifications and details can be varied without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, and these are intended to come within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4380049 | Makinen | Apr 1983 | A |
4475631 | Nomura | Oct 1984 | A |
4491197 | Nishiwaki | Jan 1985 | A |
5155305 | Horbruegger et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5265701 | Ogasawara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5457372 | Pignatelli et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5811957 | Bose et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6094024 | Westlake | Jul 2000 | A |
6147470 | Ohashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6264005 | Kang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283252 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326762 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6459224 | Itoh et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6459980 | Tabata et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060113148 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |