1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a motor vehicle door lock, and more specifically to a motor vehicle door lock with latching elements such as a latch and ratchet with a lock mechanism. The lock mechanism has a drive with a drive motor and an actuating element and the ratchet able to be raised by the drive. Also, this invention relates generally to a drive for a motor vehicle door lock with at least one displaceable operating element such as a ratchet.
2. Description of Related Art
A motor located in motor vehicle door locks can be utilized to perform an opening assist function (i.e., a lifting of the ratchet) and a central interlock function. For implementation of these functions triggered by a motor, a drive, a drive motor and an actuating element are employed. An displaceable operating element, assigned to each respective function, can be actuated. For example, in the case of the opening assist function, the displaceable operating element is the ratchet of the motor vehicle door lock.
In order to minimize the cost of circuitry associated with the control of the motion of the drive while ensuring low fault susceptibility, the aforementioned drive is increasingly employed in a blocking operation. This is shown, for example, by the motor vehicle door lock in U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,253 which corresponds to published European Patent Application EP 0 811 101 B1. Here, the actuating element of the drive has a driver journal, which in an actuating process, presses a ratchet into a raised position. Towards the end of the actuating process, the driver journal engages the ratchet so that the drive motor is blocked. As a result, the motor current rises measurably and the drive motor is turned off after a predetermined delay time.
One problem with the known motor vehicle door lock is that the blocking of the drive is associated with an unwanted striking noise. Furthermore, the application of a comparatively high torque to the actuating element leads to a higher possibility of jamming during aforementioned blocking operation.
An object of the present invention is directed to a motor vehicle door lock that has a reduced striking noise associated with a blocking operation of the drive as well as a reduced tendency to jam.
One way in which the aforementioned object is achieved is through use of the motor vehicle door lock of the present invention. A door lock with latching elements such as a latch and ratchet with a lock mechanism is provided. The lock mechanism has a drive that includes a drive motor, or the like, and an actuating element. The ratchet can be raised by the drive, and the ratchet thus moves into an action area of the drive so that the ratchet can block further movement of the drive. Thus, the movement of the ratchet can turn off the drive in a block operation. The ratchet, viewed in a “kinematic chain” from the drive motor to the actuating element, engages the drive to block in front of the actuating element and not on the actuating element itself (without directly engaging the actuating element). The engagement point of the ratchet in the kinematic chain has the advantage that the blocking, which is necessary for blocking operation, takes place at the point at which the active torque is comparatively low. Thus, this results in a reduced striking noise as well as a reduced tendency to jam.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, with respect to the output of the drive motor, the active torque is less than the torque acting on the actuating element. Additionally, the configuration of a step-down gearing with a worm and worm wheel leads to a durable configuration.
Furthermore, a symmetrical configuration of the actuating element leads to the actuating element, after motorized lifting of the ratchet, coming to rest such that repeated lifting of the ratchet, after repeated closing of the motor vehicle door, is possible.
Depending on the installation space, lever ratios, speed requirements, etc., exemplary embodiments invention include using various combinations of control cams associated with the actuating element.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a number of possibilities are conceivable regarding where, in the aforementioned kinematic chain, the blocking of the drive, necessary for blocking operation, takes place. One possibility includes blocking the drive by running the stop of a worm wheel against the ratchet. Depending on the configuration of the worm wheel the striking force necessary for blocking can be easily adjusted. This design provides a compact and efficient drive.
Various exemplary embodiments of the invention ensure that when the drive is blocked no torques act on the ratchet so that all the striking force is accommodated by the support of the ratchet.
Additionally, high flexibility, especially with respect to the aforementioned adjustability of the striking force on the worm wheel, can be achieved in accordance with the present invention.
The coupling of the latch and of the ratchet via a spring element, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, is also advantageous. This leads to the fact that, for resetting these two components, only a single spring element is necessary. Furthermore, by means of this coupling the reset behavior can be adjusted as it is dependent upon, on one hand, the respective position of the latch, and on the other, the ratchet.
The ratchet can be coupled to another element, which is advantageously supported on the swiveling axis of the ratchet. Often a ratchet drawing lever yields a degree of freedom in order for the ratchet, via the preliminary catch, to reach the main catch of the lock latch when the drive has already reached its closed position. This can be performed by a “doubled” latch lever in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. If such an element is coupled to the ratchet, it can block further motion of the drive for the purposes of the blocking operation instead of the ratchet itself.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the drive for a motor vehicle door lock can be assigned any function of a motor vehicle door lock which can be triggered by a motor.
The invention is explained in detail below using drawings which show simply embodiments.
A motor vehicle door lock, for the purposes of the present invention, can include a side door lock, a hood lock or a hatch lock of a motor vehicle body.
The ratchet 2 has a hook-shaped recess 6 which can engage the preliminary catch 4 or the main catch 5 and keep the latch 1 in its respective position. For this purpose, the latch 1 is likewise pretensioned, in
The ratchet 2, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, is a twin-armed lever with two component levers 7, 8. The first component lever 7 (depicted in
It should be pointed out that, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the ratchet 2 can also be made as a single-arm lever in addition to rotational and linear versions.
The ratchet 2 can be raised by the drive 11 which as shown in
The drive 11 includes the following components: a drive motor 12, an actuating element 13 and a worm wheel 14. The drive motor 12 is equipped with a worm 15 which meshes with the external teeth of the worm wheel 14. The external teeth of the worm wheel 14, in turn, mesh with external teeth on the actuating element 13 so that the drive motor 12 can move the actuating element 13. Step-down gearing is interposed between the drive motor 12 and the actuating element 13 by the aforementioned worm-worm wheel coupling.
The actuating element 13 includes an engagement arrangement 16 which can be located on the face of the actuating element 13. The engagement element 16, in an embodiment of a control roller, can also be located on the outside periphery of the actuating element 13.
In particular, the engagement arrangement 16, viewed over the adjustment area of the actuating element 13, is made symmetrical and has three elongated control cams 17 that protrude from the center of the actuating element 13. After motorized lifting of the ratchet 2 and with repeated closing of the motor vehicle door lock when the ratchet 2 subsequently engages the preliminary catch 4 and the main catch 5, the control cams 17 are arranged such that the ratchet 4 comes to rest in a position from which further lifting of the ratchet is possible by the corresponding nearest control cam 17. Depending on the application, it can also be advantageous to provide more than three control cams 17. It is also conceivable to provide only a single control cam 17 on the actuating element 13. An exemplary embodiment of an actuating element 13 which is equipped with two control cams 17 is detailed below.
The lifting of the ratchet 2 out of the position of having dropped into the preliminary catch 4 or the main catch 5 takes place such that movement of the actuating element 13, in
The worm wheel 14 has a stop 20 that is located on the worm wheel 14 so that, after motorized pivoted of the ratchet 2 in front of the block, it runs against the actuating surface 10 on the ratchet 2 (the worm wheel 14 turns around to the right in
Therefore the lifting of the ratchet 2, in performing the blocking operation and the utilization of the above described stop 20 on the worm wheel 14 allows the drive motor 12 to be turned off after actuation.
It is advantageous that the stop 20 is located on the worm wheel 14 and not, for example, on the actuating element 13. This advantage is apparent against the background that the coupling between the drive motor 12 and the actuating element 13 via the worm wheel 14 is made as step-down gearing. The present invention provides that proceeding from the drive motor 12, with each gear stage, the rpm drops and the torque rises. Therefore, the torque which acts on the actuating element 13 is greater than the torque acting on the worm wheel 14. Consequently, the resulting striking force between the stop 20 and the actuating surface 10 of the ratchet 2 is comparatively small. A reduction of the striking noise and a reduction of the tendency to jam accompany the reduction of the striking force.
The arrangement of the stop 20 is not limited to being arranged on worm wheel 14. Rather, the stop 20, viewed along the kinematic chain from the drive motor 12 via the worm wheel 14 as far as the actuating element 13, is located as “near” as possible to the drive motor 12. Therefore, one exemplary embodiment calls for placing the stop 20 directly on the worm 15 of the drive motor 12. The opposite applies to the engagement arrangement 16 or to the control cams 17 which should be located as far as possible “away” from the drive motor 12 in the aforementioned kinematic chain so that here a torque as high as possible acts on the ratchet 2 and reliable actuation of the ratchet 2 is ensured.
A series of other advantageous exemplary embodiments, described below, is also possible.
For example, the worm wheel 14 could include several stops 20 arranged in succession viewed over the adjustment area of the worm wheel 14. This is advantageous, for example, if the actuating process of the ratchet 2 does not require a complete revolution of the worm wheel 14.
Furthermore, in place of the worm wheel 14 or in addition to the worm wheel 14 there can be any gearing arrangement which, if necessary, has a stop 20 or several stops 20 anywhere. The resulting gearing can also be a single-stage gearing as shown in
Basically, in the construction with the aforementioned concept, there is the possibility of swiveling the actuating element 13 with the worm wheel 14 largely at will around the ratchet axis 21. Therefore, a compact arrangement, depending on the installation space conditions, is possible. Furthermore, there is the possibility of swiveling the drive motor 12 around the worm wheel axis 22. In the construction, therefore, a series of degrees of freedom is possible which enable optimum utilization of the installation space conditions.
It should furthermore be pointed out that the drive 11 need not be a rotary drive, but could also be a linear drive, optionally with reset springs. Achieving minimum striking forces in block operation by the explained fundamental arrangement of the stop 20 is an advantageous aspect of the present invention.
In any case, the above described rotary drive 11 offers the advantage that there are no energy losses, generally associated with the use of a reset spring. Finally, the further advantage of the aforementioned detail construction is that the running noise of the resulting gearing between the drive motor 12 and the actuating element 13 is low since the first gear stage is made as a worm wheel stage.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Another exemplary embodiment of the motor vehicle door lock is shown in
The difference of the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
Likewise, in agreement with the motor vehicle door lock shown in
According to the fact that the engagement arrangement 16 in the embodiment shown in
The coupling shown in
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention includes a double-acting leg spring between the latch 1 and the ratchet 2. It is supported here on the spike of the latch 1 and one arm of the leg spring (spring element 25) interacts with an actuating arm molded on the ratchet. This is shown especially well in
Finally it should be pointed out that the ratchet 2 has a coupling point 26 that allows manual lifting of the ratchet 2, for example via a sheathed cable (not shown). Furthermore, a microswitch 27 is shown which ensures monitoring of the ratchet position.
According to another embodiment, the drive of a motor vehicle door lock as such is provided. This drive comprises the drives shown in
Finally it should be pointed out that inventive importance within the framework of this application is assigned to each of the aforementioned features in combination with one or more features or taken for themselves.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 58 092 | Dec 2002 | DE | national |
103 34 579 | Jul 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5348357 | Konchan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5938253 | Szablewski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6182527 | Sander | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6390517 | Ehret | May 2002 | B1 |
6409238 | Mikenis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6565131 | Roos | May 2003 | B2 |
6575507 | Reddmann | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6817636 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20010010427 | Roos | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040113438 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |