This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Patent Application No. PCT/DE2013/000515, filed Sep. 5, 2013, which claims priority of German Application No. 10 2012 017 677.5, filed Sep. 7, 2012, which are both hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a motor vehicle door lock with a locking mechanism essentially comprising a rotary latch and pawl as well as a release element for the locking mechanism and a storage element, ensuring an unobstructed opening movement of the rotary latch from a closed into an open position.
In a motor vehicle door lock of the described design and as disclosed in DE 10 2006 032 033 A1, the storage element ensures that when in a storage position, the pawl is kept in its release position when the rotary latch is rotated out of its closed position until it passes the initial locking position. For this purpose, the storage element contains a support section assigned to the release element, moving in front of a storage stage of the rotary latch upon actuation of the release element in order to reach the storage position. This storage stage is exited again once the initial locking position has been passed. The storage element thus prevents that the pawl can unintentionally engage (again) with the rotary latch during the opening movement of the rotary latch. Such operational states are, for instance, feasible in tailgates and in the event that they are, for instance, covered by a snow load.
In a motor vehicle door closure according to DE 40 42 678 C1, a storage lever is assigned to a triggering lever as a storage element. In the storage position of the storage element the pawl is retained in the open position until the rotary latch has been completely opened by manual opening of a respective motor vehicle door. In this way it should be ensured that where, for instance, opening of the motor vehicle door is actuated remotely but is not executed fully, the pawl is prevented from engaging in the rotary latch (again) and the door can not (no longer) be opened. Such an operational state can occur when the motorized drive for disengaging the pawl is returned to its base position after the remote control opening signal.
Not all aspects of prior art embodiments are satisfactory. The design disclosed in DE 40 42 678 C1 is relative complex, using numerous levers. DE 10 2006 032 033 A1 has simplified this point, as the storage element now contains a support section assigned to the release element. The storage element does, however, still act on the pawl in order to retain it in its release position. As soon as the functionality of the storage element is impaired in any way, the pawl can still engage with the rotary latch, so that malfunctioning must be feared. The invention aims to remedy this.
The invention is based on the technical problem of further developing said motor vehicle door lock in such a way that whilst using a simple design, the greatest possible reliability is provided.
In order to solve this technical problem, a generic motor vehicle door lock of the invention is characterised in that the storage element retains the release element in an ineffective position with respect to the locking mechanism during the opening movement of the rotary latch.
In contrast to prior art as disclosed, for instance, in DE 10 2006 032 033 A1, the storage element does not act on the pawl but instead on the release element. The storage element ensures that the release element is retained in an ineffective position with respect to the locking mechanism during the opening movement of the rotary latch. In other words, the storage element actually acts on the release element and not on the pawl.
In order to ensure that in this constellation the pawl does not automatically engage the rotary latch, the pawl is advantageously pretensioned in the direction of a disengaged position. This is typically ensured by a spring assigned to the pawl, consequently keeping the pawl out of the engagement area with the rotary latch. In this way, a particularly reliably functioning arrangement with a simple design is provided. Due to its selected pretensioning, the pawl cannot as such interact with the rotary latch or only when a blocking lever assigned to the pawl acts upon the pawl accordingly so that it can engage in the main locking position or can interact with a main latching edge of the rotary latch.
In all other cases the rotary latch is anyway disengaged from the pawl. As, in addition, the storage element retains the release element in its ineffective position, the rotary latch carries out the opening movement with basically no mechanical influence. An unintentional blocking or impeding of this opening movement of the rotary latch from its closed to its open position can consequently already not occur in principle. Compared to prior art embodiments, functional reliability has increased considerably as a result.
A further advantage is that the design is particularly simple as the storage element is advantageously connected to the release element and regularly interacts with a storage stage. This storage stage can be provided on the rotary latch. This means that for the storage element to be effective, the storage element only has to rest against the storage stage and glides along it and that, in this way, the release element coupled to the storage element is held in its ineffective position with respect to the locking mechanism. This applies, in any case for the entire path of the storage element along the storage stage.
For this purpose, the storage element advantageously contains a tappet interacting with the storage stage. The tappet and storage stage regularly contain corresponding sloping surfaces. In this way the tappet can be moved from a detent position engaging the storage stage into a release position gliding along the storage stage. In order to cause such a movement the release element only has to be acted on accordingly. As soon as the release element is, for instance, pivoted from the detent position of the tappet into a release position, the corresponding sloping surfaces of the tappet and of the storage stage glide along each other and the tappet moves from its detent position, engaging the storage stage, into the release position.
As already explained, the tappet and thus the storage element glides along the storage stage in the release position of the rotary latch. The ineffective position of the release element relating to the locking mechanism corresponds to this. This means that as long as the tappet glides along the storage stage in the release position, the release element is unable to interact with the locking mechanism, as it is in an ineffective position with respect to the locking mechanism.
The storage stage is regularly arch-shaped and has a radius adapted to its distance from the rotary axis of the rotary latch and can extend over an angle of less than 120°, and preferably less than 90° and even more preferably of 50°. As a result, the opening rotary latch ensures that the release element is retained in the ineffective position, as long as the tappet glides along the arch-shaped storage stage. As soon as the tappet leaves or is able to leave the arch-shaped storage stage, the rotary latch can in principle me moved into a closing position or into the closed position. In one embodiment, an angle of 47° is used, i.e. the arch-shaped storage stage extends over an angle area of 47° along an outer edge of the rotary latch, ensuring that the triggering lever is being reliably kept away.
A respective closing movement of the rotary latch corresponds to the two sloping surfaces of the tappet, on one hand, and the storage stage, on the other hand, gliding along each other. This occurs as part of the closing movement of rotary latch until the rotary latch has reached its closed position or main locking position. The pawl then also engages in the respective main latching edge of the rotary latch. This is ensured by the blocking lever assigned to the pawl, which in this case is pivoted with the aid of a spring into a position, moving the pawl into the main detent position of the rotary latch against the force of its own spring. The blocking lever in turn is assigned to the release element.
Depending on the main locking position of the locking mechanism, the release element is able to remove or pivot away the blocking lever from its seat against the pawl. As a result, the pawl is moved by the force of the spring into the position that is disengaged from the rotary latch. At the same time, impinging of the release element ensures that the storage element with its tappet is moved from the previously assumed engaging detent position with respect to the storage stage into the release position, gliding along the storage stage. From this operating position the rotary latch can move by itself with the aid of the spring from its closed to its open position without influence of the pawl and the release element. In the open position, the rotary latch releases a previously retained locking bolt, so that a respective motor vehicle door can be easily opened by an operator.
All of this is achieved by an embodiment with a reliable design, requiring a minimum of components. The release element and the storage element are actually regularly designed as a single unit or single component. The unit comprising the release element and the storage element can at least partially be made of plastic. In the same way, the rotary latch and the storage stage can be provided as a single unit. This unit may be made of plastic or metal.
According to the invention, the rotary latch does or can also during the described closing process and prior to reaching its closed position or main locking position also assume an initial locking position. For this purpose the pawl can contain another lever connected to the release element in a rotationally fixed manner. This additional lever can interact with a protrusion on the rotary latch when assuming the initial locking position but is in general not required. These are the main advantages of the invention.
Below the invention is explained in detail with reference to drawings showing only one embodiment, in which:
The figures show a motor vehicle door lock, the basic construction of which is equipped with a locking mechanism 1, 2 consisting essentially of a rotary latch 1 and pawl 2. Furthermore, a release element 3 is provided for the locking mechanism 1, 2. In addition, the basic construction includes a storage element 4, ensuring an unobstructed opening movement of the rotary latch 1 from a closed into an open position. The effect of the storage element 4 is particularly apparent, when the closed position of the rotary latch 1 shown in
The invention achieves said unobstructed opening movement of the rotary latch 1 from its closed into its open position by the storage element 4 holding the release element 3 during the opening movement of the rotary latch 1 in its ineffective position with respect to the locking mechanism 1, 2. The pawl 2 is also ineffective in this case. In the embodiment this is ensured by a spring—not explicitly shown—pretensioning the pawl 2 in relation to its axis of rotation 5 in counter-clockwise direction as shown in
In the closed position of the locking mechanism 1, 2 or of the main locking position of the rotary latch 1 shown in
The release element 3 is a triggering lever 3, designed as a single-arm lever and mounted on the same axis as the pawl 2 and pivotable around the common axis or axis of rotation 5. In contrast, the blocking lever 6 assigned to the release element or triggering lever 3 has its own axis or axis of rotation 9, around which the blocking lever 6 is pivotably mounted. In the example embodiment the blocking lever 6 can, for instance also contain a spring, pretensioning the blocking lever 6 in counter-clockwise direction in respect to its axis of rotation 9, as shown by another arrow in
According to the invention, the storage element 4 is connected to the release element or the triggering lever 3. The storage element 4 is actually an extension arm connected at an angle to the lengthwise extending triggering lever 3. In the example embodiment, the release element 4 or the respective extension arm is connected at right angles or at nearly right angles to the lengthwise extending triggering lever 3. In any case, the release element or the triggering lever 3 and also the storage element 4 or the corresponding extension arm actually define a single unit 3, 4, that can be made wholly or partially of plastic.
A storage stage 10 is assigned to the storage element 4. In the example embodiment, the storage stage 10 is provided on the rotary latch 1 and is in this case designed as an arcuate web. The web can be formed in a plastic casing of the metal rotary latch 1. The storage stage 10 actually has a radius R, adapted to the distance of the storage stage 10 from the axis of rotation 11 of the rotary latch 1.
The storage element 4 contains a tappet 12 interacting with the storage stage 10, as shown in the detailed perspective view of
In the operating position shown in
During the transition from the main locking position shown in
The opening movement of the rotary latch 1 follows the main locking position as shown in
As a result, the rotary latch 1 is in a kind of readiness state for a subsequent closing operation. When starting from the open or fully open position shown in
Before this operation, an optional ratchet lever 2′ on the pawl 2 can interact with a protrusion—not shown—on the rotary latch 1. This means that before, starting from the fully opened position in
As soon as the rotary latch 1 has reached the position shown in
As soon as the rotary latch 1 has reached the position shown in
In order to leave this position, the release element 3 must first of all be pivoted in counter-clockwise direction around its own axis of rotation 5, as apparent from the transition between
The edge 15 on the release element 3 actually impinges on the pin 16 of the blocking lever 6 in such a way that the blocking lever 6 is moved in clockwise direction around its axis 9 during the transition from
The extension arm 17 on the blocking lever 6 only leaves the recess 19 on the pawl 2 again when, starting from the operating position shown in
The shown motor vehicle door lock can be designed as a motor vehicle door lock for a motor vehicle side door. Generally the motor vehicle door lock is, however, a lock for a tailgate or a tailgate lock. The additional ratchet lever 2′ is thus not required on the pawl 2. This means that in this case no two-pawl locking mechanism is provided but the locking mechanism 1, 2 is only able to assume the main locking position shown in
As already explained above, the release element 3 and the storage element 4 can be produced as part of the same production process, with the used unit 3, 4 being essentially made of plastic. In contrast, the additional ratchet lever 2″ is in most cases made of metal. The ratchet lever 2″ is generally connected to the release element 3 in a rotationally fixed manner.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 017 677 | Sep 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2013/000515 | 9/5/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/036991 | 3/13/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6371536 | Koerwer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6581988 | Mihail | Jun 2003 | B1 |
8894107 | Kamata | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20050001437 | Brose | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050121922 | Cetnar | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060012186 | Zillert | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055181 | Berghahn | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20110205660 | Komura | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110316293 | Luschper | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120181798 | Margheritti | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19617428 | Nov 1997 | DE |
4042678 | Oct 1999 | DE |
10130260 | Oct 2002 | DE |
20 2004 019 060 | Apr 2006 | DE |
102006032033 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102006032033 | Mar 2007 | DE |
202012002867 | May 2012 | DE |
102010061427 | Jun 2012 | DE |
1818484 | Aug 2007 | EP |
09303025 | Nov 1997 | JP |
09393925 | Nov 1997 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of JP09303025A by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Jun. 21, 2017. |
Machine Translation of DE102006032033A1 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Apr. 3, 2015. |
Machine Translation of DE102010061427A1 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Apr. 3, 2015. |
Machine Translation of DE202012002867U1 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Apr. 3, 2015. |
Machine Translation of DE4042678C1 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Apr. 3, 2015. |
Machine translation of DE10130260A1 by Patent Translate European Patent Office dated Dec. 14, 2018 (pp. 19). |
Machine translation of DE19617428A1 by Patent Translate European Patent Office dated Dec. 17, 2018 (pp. 16). |
Machine translation of DE202004019060U1 by Patent Translate European Patent Office dated Dec. 17, 2018 (pp. 26). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150233156 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |