The invention relates to a lock for a door or hatch, having a locking mechanism that comprises a rotary latch and a locking pawl for latching the rotary latch. The rotary latch has a protruding blocking surface and a pocket-shaped recess adjoining the protruding blocking surface.
Such a lock serves to close openings in motor vehicles or vehicles at times, with the aid of doors or hatches. In the closed state of such a lock, the rotary latch grasps the locking bolt, normally of arcuate design, which in the case of a motor vehicle is usually attached to the body. If the rotary latch reaches a closed position by swiveling starting from an open position, the rotary latch is ultimately latched by means of the locking pawl. The rotary latch can then no longer be turned back in the direction of the open position, and the locking bolt can no longer leave the locking mechanism. To open, it is necessary to move the locking pawl out of the latching position.
In the closed position, the blocking surfaces of rotary latch and locking pawl are pressed against each other during latching. Both blocking surfaces are normally made of metal.
There are locks with two different latching positions of the rotary latch. The rotary latch can then first be latched in the so-called pre-latching position, and finally in the so-called main latching position by turning it further in the closing direction. It is true that in the pre-latching position a locking bolt can no longer leave the locking mechanism. But a corresponding door or hatch is not yet completely closed. Such a door or hatch is not completely closed until the rotary latch is turned further to the main latching position.
In the lifetime of a lock, in particular one utilized in motor vehicles, depending on the environmental conditions more or less thick coatings may form on the blocking surfaces of rotary latch and locking pawl, for example dust coatings from dust particles in the environment. Such coatings are unwanted. They increase the actuating forces to open the locking mechanism, and consequently diminish the comfort of operation. So if two blocking surfaces are pressed against each other for latching, and if dust has gotten between them, the opening forces increase with longer life.
From unpublished German patent application 10 2010 034 770, a lock is known having a locking mechanism in which the metal blocking surface of the rotary latch is in the form of an arcuate projection. Starting from this blocking surface, a pocket-shaped protrusion is formed in the rotary latch. Overall, the pocket-shaped protrusion is approximately V-shaped. In addition, on one side of the blocking surface the rotary latch of this lock has an overhang of the sheathing, which is normally made of plastic. With this overhang, the blocking surface of the locking pawl is brushed off in the manner of a scouring brush when entering into the “main latching” position of the lock, and consequently is freed of any soiling that may be present, such as dust.
It is the object of the present invention to prepare a lock that prevents an increase of opening forces with longer life, in particular due to soiling on the blocking surfaces, or where such an increase is at least reduced.
To fulfill the object, the lock includes the features of Claim 1. Advantageous forms result from the subordinate claims.
The lock for a door or hatch has a locking mechanism that comprises a rotary latch and at least one locking pawl for latching the rotary latch. The rotary latch has a protruding blocking surface and a pocket-shaped recess adjoining the latter. Starting from the protruding blocking surface, the pocket-shaped recess or pocket extends arcuately, whereby a “V”-shape is avoided. The arcuate shape prevents zones in which dust may accumulate to an increased extent. If dust is unable to accumulate to an increased extent, then there is correspondingly less dust available that may penetrate between blocking surfaces and be deposited, thus causing an increase in opening forces. Due to the arcuate transition from protruding blocking surface to the pocket, there is no corner in which dust could collect to an increased extent adjacent to the blocking surface.
It is true that an arcuate shape at the bottom of the V-shaped pocket is also known from German patent application DE 10 2010 034 770. However, this arc is separated from the protruding blocking surface by an angular transition.
Preferably, the arc does not include any rectilinear sections, so as to be able to keep the dimensions of the pocket small and the arc radii large. Through dust accumulation a coating builds up in the direction of the protruding blocking surface, which coating may pass over into the protruding blocking surface. A coating passing over into the protruding blocking surface causes an increase in opening forces. An accumulation of dust acting in this way, and an accompanying increase of opening forces, are avoided especially well with this embodiment, without having to provide a very large pocket for that purpose, which would result in an unwanted corresponding enlargement of the rotary latch. As long as the arc comprises relatively small radii, these are preferably located at a distance from the protruding blocking surface. In particular, the smallest zone with the smallest radius is located in the side wall of the pocket that lies opposite the protruding blocking surface.
The arc preferably extends over at least 100°, by preference over at least 140°, by further preference over at least 170°, and by particular preference over at least 175°. Preferably the arc does not extend over more than 190°. Only adjacent to such an arc can a rectilinear shape or an angular transition follow, which is however then located sufficiently far from the protruding blocking surface, at which opening forces may increase due to dust.
The radius of the arc is in particular not smaller than 1 mm, by particular preference not smaller than 1.5 mm, in order to prevent an approach to disadvantageous angular shapes. In the zone or in the side wall which abuts on the protruding blocking surface of the rotary latch, the radius of the arc is no smaller than 2 mm, preferably no smaller than 2.5 mm. The width of the opening of the pocket is preferably at least 4, mm, by particular preference at least 5 mm, for example approximately 5.5 mm. The pocket is preferably at least 2 mm deep, by particular preference at least 3 mm deep.
The opening of the pocket-shaped recess in the open and/or closed state of the rotary latch is preferably open downward, or at least obliquely downward. Particles can then fall out of the recess due to gravity. Thus, there are then no bowl-shaped zones in which dust could accumulate because of gravity alone.
In one embodiment of the invention, in addition to the formed pocket, the geometry of the rotary latch and locking pawl blocking surfaces is such that a pressure exerted on the locking pawl by the rotary latch does not produce any closing moment on the locking mechanism. In the case of a lock without a blockade lever which is able to block the locking pawl in the latched position, the geometry of said rotary latch and locking pawl is normally such that a closing moment can be introduced in the locking pawl by the rotary latch. In such a conventional lock, if the rotary latch exerts a pressure on the locking pawl in the main latching position, then a torque develops which attempts to turn the locking pawl in the direction of the latching position. Surprisingly, it has been found that with this embodiment, in which the rotary latch is not able to introduce any closing moment in the locking pawl, primarily in combination with the pocket according to the claims, it is possible to further improve the prevention of deposits on blocking surfaces which result in an increase in opening forces. The blocking surface of the locking pawl in this embodiment in particular has no regularly provided undercut, since otherwise the rotary latch would be able to introduce a closing moment in the locking pawl, whereby the locking pawl would be pressed in the direction of its latching position.
The invention may include one or more features of the locks mentioned at the beginning that are already known from the prior art, unless otherwise explicitly described as being according to the invention.
The invention will be explained in greater detail below on the basis of one exemplary embodiment. Unless otherwise explicitly described, the features evident from the exemplary embodiment may be combined with the claimed object individually or in any combination.
The figures show the following:
The rotary latch 1 has a second latching surface 11 for latching the rotary latch in the pre-latching position. Between the latching surface 11 and the protruding blocking surface 9, the rotary latch includes a land 12 made of plastic, which is able to damp an impact of the locking pawl 2, which is pre-tensioned in the direction of the rotary latch, when the rotary latch 1 is rotated clockwise from the open position in the direction of the closed position. A comparably operating damping element in the form of an arcuate land 13 made of plastic is situated at a lever end of the locking pawl 2. On the one hand, this damping element acts as a stop, which limits the swiveling of the locking pawl 2 in the main latching position. At the same time, the arcuate land 13 damps an impact when the locking pawl 2 is moved into the main latching position, for example due to a correspondingly pre-tensioned spring.
A land 14 made of plastic, which acts as a damping element, damps an impact of locking bolt 3 on the catcher arm 15 of the rotary latch 1 during a closing motion. In the depicted main latching position, the load arm 15 prevents the locking bolt 3 from being able to leave the locking mechanism.
The rotary latch 1 and the locking pawl 2 are made of metal, which is partially sheathed in a covering of plastic for the purpose of damping and minimizing friction losses.
In
In
It has been found that avoiding an increase in opening forces with longer life is more successful if the size of the pocket 17 is increased. Since on the other hand a lock should be small, the pocket cannot be designed with unlimited size. Against this background, it has proven to be expedient to dimension the pocket as follows: The width of the opening of the pocket 17 should be at least 4 mm, preferably at least 5 mm. The width of the opening of the pocket should be no more than 7 mm, preferably no more than 6 mm. The maximum depth of the pocket 17 should be no more than 4.5 mm, preferably no more than 3.5 mm. The minimum depth of the pocket 17 should be at least 1.5 mm, preferably at least 2.5 mm.
In
In addition, the radii of the pocket 17 are clarified in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 003 295.9 | Jan 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2012/000021 | 1/12/2012 | WO | 00 | 7/31/2014 |