This application is the US National Stage under 35 USC § 371 of International Application No. PCT/FR2018/052106, filed 27 Aug. 2018 which claims priority to French Application No. 1758458 filed 12 Sep. 2017, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to the anti-roll (or stabilization) devices with which some motor vehicles are equipped.
As is known to a person skilled in the art, an anti-roll (or stabilization) device is a piece of equipment comprising a bar the opposing ends of which are respectively coupled to right and left wheels of a (motor) vehicle wheelset via two links.
A device of this type is mainly acted on when the vehicle is rolling on a turn or on a traffic lane that is eroded asymmetrically about the longitudinal axis thereof. During a turn, the bar is placed under torsion and bending so as to maintain the attitude of the vehicle insofar as possible, and so the more rigid it is the more useful it is. In the presence of erosion, the bar partially transmits the irregularity of the traffic lane experienced by one of the wheels of a wheelset to the other wheel of this same wheelset, by a mechanism known as roll transfer, and thus the more rigid it is the greater a decrease in comfort it causes.
As is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,319, the decrease in comfort caused by the anti-roll device can be varied as a function of the scenarios encountered, by joining to each link a hydraulic actuator, which is coupled to a fluid circuit comprising a solenoid valve, check valves and a fluid reservoir for compensating the variations in volume caused by the movements of the piston of the hydraulic actuator. In this context, each fluid circuit is of relatively low-complexity, but the presence of two fluid circuits increases the total space requirement and the price. Thus, when the vehicle comprises two wheelsets, there end up being four solenoid valves. However, the higher the number of solenoid valves, the greater the risk of breakdown or malfunction and the higher the electrical power consumption. Moreover, the higher the number of solenoid valves, the greater the number of electrical harnesses have to be provided for supplying power and commands to these solenoid valves, and so the more the production and installation costs and the complexity of installation in the vehicle and of the algorithms for generating the commands for the solenoid valves are increased.
Moreover, the hydraulic circuit does not make it possible to ensure that the hydraulic actuator is in the neutral position (where it does not exert any force) when it is placed in a blocked state (preventing a variation in length).
Therefore, the object of the invention is in particular to improve the situation.
For this purpose, an anti-roll device is proposed which is intended for equipping a motor vehicle wheelset having right and left wheels, and comprising a bar suitable for coupling to these right and left wheels via two links.
This anti-roll device is characterized in that it comprises
As a result of the invention, it is now possible to place the actuating means in the blocked state regardless of the current position of the piston. The link or bar comprising the actuating means will always return to the neutral position under the effect of the movement of the wheels or undercarriage, and will remain in the neutral position afterwards. This makes it possible to achieve the blocked behavior without waiting for the link or bar to be positioned in the center. This also avoids implementing a control algorithm for blocking the link or bar in the neutral position, along with the associated sensors and the related risks.
The anti-roll device may have other features, which may be taken separately or in combination, and in particular:
The invention further proposes a motor vehicle comprising at least one wheelset comprising right and left wheels coupled via an anti-roll device of the same type set out above.
Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon examining the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, in which:
The object of the invention is, in particular, to propose an anti-roll (or stabilization) device DA for equipping a wheelset of a motor vehicle.
In the following, it is assumed by way of non-limiting example that the motor vehicle is a car. However, the invention is not limited to such a motor vehicle. In fact, it relates to any type of motor vehicle comprising at least one wheelset that is to be equipped with an anti-roll device.
Moreover, it is assumed in the following, by way of non-limiting example, that the wheelset is intended for installation in a front part of a motor vehicle. However, the invention equally relates to rear motor vehicle wheelsets.
The (anti-roll) bar BA is suitable for coupling to right and left wheels of a motor vehicle wheelset, via the first B1 and second B2 links. It is moreover coupled to the undercarriage of the vehicle, for example via bearings PB, as is shown in a non-limiting manner in
It will be noted that, in the two examples shown in a non-limiting manner in
In the first example, shown in a non-limiting manner in
In the second example, shown in a non-limiting manner in
In the two examples shown in a non-limiting manner in
The actuating means MAC are either part of one of the links Bj, as shown in
The casing CR defines a chamber CH subdivided into first P1 and second P2 parts of variable volume by a piston PI rigidly fixed to a rod T. In addition, the casing CR comprises a first input/output ES1 that communicates with the first part P1 of the chamber CH, a second input/output ES2 that communicates with the second part P2 of the chamber CH, and an intermediate input/output ESI that communicates with the first part P1 or the second part P2 of the chamber CH depending on the position of the piston PI.
The casing CR and the piston PI (with the rod T thereof) define a sort of actuator having three inputs/outputs ES1, ES2 and ESI.
The piston PI comprises a peripheral edge BP having a thickness e strictly greater than a corresponding dimension of the intermediate input/output ESI, in such a way that fluid cannot enter or exit via the input/output ESI of the chamber CH when the piston PI is placed in front of this intermediate input/output ESI.
It is preferable for the peripheral edge BP of the piston PI partially to house a gasket JE having a thickness strictly greater than the corresponding dimension of the intermediate input/output ESI. This makes it possible for the gasket JE to obstruct the intermediate input/output ESI completely when the piston PI is placed in front of this intermediate input/output ESI (and therefore midway).
In the first example, shown in a non-limiting manner in
It will be noted that the casing CR may, for example, have a circular cylindrical shape.
It will also be noted that, in the first example, shown in a non-limiting manner in
In the second example, shown in a non-limiting manner in
These actuating means MAC may adopt either a disengaged position or a blocked position in any given position of the piston PI, according to the accessibility status of the first ES1 and second ES2 inlets/outlets and of the intermediate inlet/outlet ESI.
Here, “accessibility status” is understood to mean whether it is possible or impossible for a fluid to enter via an input/output so as to penetrate into a part of the chamber of the casing or exit via an input/output to flow in the control circuit CC.
The control circuit CC is hydraulic (and is thus passed through by a fluid), and controls the accessibility statuses of the inputs/outputs ES1, ES2 and ESI according to the commands received.
The fluid may, for example, be an oil. Thus, it may for example be a hydraulic oil or a shock absorber oil.
Each received command may, for example, be determined as a function of irregularities detected below the vehicle by a physical parameter sensor (such as an accelerometer) and/or of an end of a turn, detected in front of the vehicle by observation means or by a satellite navigation system, and/or of the current speed of the vehicle. Moreover, each received command originates from control means MCT, which may optionally be part of the anti-roll device DA. For example, it may be part of a computer of the vehicle and be responsible for determining each command dynamically in real time.
For example, the control circuit CC may comprise first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means, at least one solenoid valve EVk (k=1 or 2) and a fluid reservoir RF, as is shown in a non-limiting manner in
The first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means are each coupled to at least one of the first ES1 and second ES2 inputs/outputs and the intermediate input/output ESI.
For example, these first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means may be arranged in the form of non-return valves. However, this is not required. In fact, what is important is that they each allow a flow of fluid in a single direction (in this case to at least one of the inputs/outputs ES1 and ES2) but not in the opposite direction (in this case namely from at least one of the inputs/outputs ES1 and ES2).
The/each solenoid valve EVk is coupled to at least one of the first ES1 and second ES2 inputs/outputs and the intermediate input/output ESI, and optionally to at least one of the first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means, and may be placed either in a first state enforcing the disengaged state of the actuation means MAC or in a second state enforcing the blocked state of the actuation means MAC.
In the disengaged state, the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH may be interconnected and connected to the fluid reservoir RF by the control circuit CC, and as a result the length (or height) of the first link B1 can be varied freely. As can be appreciated, in the disengaged state, the/each solenoid valve EVk is adapted to allow fluid to bypass the first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means, such that fluid can flow from the reservoir to the first ES1 and second ES2 inputs/outputs.
In the blocked state, the/each solenoid valve EVk only allows evacuation of fluid from the chamber CH via the intermediate input/output ESI, and as a result the length (or height) of the first link B1 cannot be varied freely. This is a mode of operation similar to that of a hydraulic ratchet, making it possible to have a midway equilibrium position when the piston PI is at the intermediate input/output ESI.
The (first or second) state in which a solenoid valve EVk is placed is guided (or defined) by the command received by this solenoid valve EVk.
The fluid reservoir RF is responsible for compensating at least variations in volume caused by displacements of the piston PI, as well as potentially variations due to temperature.
The example control circuit CC described above may be arranged in different forms. Five of these forms are described in the following with reference to
In the first form, illustrated in
This control circuit CC couples:
In addition, the control circuit CC places the first EV1 and second EV2 solenoid valves either in the first, open state, when the actuating means MAC are to be placed in the disengaged state, or in the second, closed state, when the actuating means MAC are to be placed in the blocked state. As a result, in the disengaged state, the fluid flows between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, as well as between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF. In the blocked state, the fluid is prevented from flowing not only between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, but also between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF.
In the second form, illustrated in
This control circuit CC couples:
In addition, the control circuit CC places the first EV1 and second EV2 solenoid valves either in the first, open state, when the actuating means MAC is to be placed in the disengaged state, or in the second, closed state, when the actuating means MAC is to be placed in the blocked state. As a result, in the disengaged state, the fluid flows between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, as well as between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF. In the blocked state, the fluid is prevented from flowing not only between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, but also between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF.
In the third form, illustrated in
This control circuit CC couples:
In addition, the control circuit CC places the solenoid valve EV1 either in the first, open state, when the actuating means MAC is to be placed in the disengaged state, or in the second, closed state, when the actuating means MAC is to be placed in the blocked state. As a result, in the disengaged state, the fluid flows between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, as well as between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF. In the blocked state, the fluid is prevented from flowing not only between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH, but also between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF.
In the fourth form, illustrated in
In the fifth form, illustrated in
This control circuit CC couples the first ES1 and second ES2 inputs/outputs and the intermediate input/output ESI to the fluid reservoir RF via the solenoid valve EV1, which comprises the first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means, which only allow passage of fluid from the fluid reservoir to the first ES1 and second ES2 inputs/outputs respectively. The port p1 is coupled to the first input/output ES1 and thus to the first part P1 of the chamber CH. The port p2 is coupled to the second input/output ES2 and thus to the second part P2 of the chamber CH. The port p3 is coupled to the intermediate input/output ESI. The other ports p4 to p6 are coupled to the fluid reservoir RF.
In this case, the solenoid valve EV1 is capable of adopting either a first, open state, which is associated with the disengaged state and in which the fluid flows between the first P1 and second P2 parts and the fluid reservoir RF but does not flow between the intermediate input/output ESI and the fluid reservoir RF, or a second state, which is associated with the blocked state and in which the fluid flows from the fluid reservoir RF to the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH via the first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means respectively and flows between the intermediate input/output ESI and the fluid reservoir RF.
In addition, the control circuit CC places the solenoid valve EV1 either in the first, open state, when the actuating means MAC are to be placed in the disengaged state, or in the second state, when the actuating means MAC are to be placed in the blocked state. As a result, in the disengaged state, the fluid flows between the ports p1 and p4 and between the ports p2 and p5, and thus between the first P1 and second P2 parts of the chamber CH and the fluid reservoir RF, but cannot flow between the ports p3 and p6, preventing it from flowing between the intermediate input/output ESI and the fluid reservoir RF.
In the blocked state, the fluid flows from the port p4 to the port p1 via the first non-return means MA1, from the port p5 to the port p2 via the second non-return means MA2, and freely (in both directions) between the ports p3 and p6, and thus the intermediate input/output ESI is directly coupled to the fluid reservoir RF.
In each of the arrangement examples described above, the actuating means MAC may be placed in the blocked state regardless of the position of the piston PI, and this is particularly advantageous. However, if this placement in the blocked state occurs at the moment when the piston PI is not obstructing the intermediate input/output ESI, the piston PI will automatically return to a midway equilibrium position in which it obstructs the intermediate input/output ESI. This is referred to as automatic centering.
It will also be noted that the fluid reservoir RF and/or the first MA1 and second MA2 non-return means and/or each solenoid valve EVk and/or the lines may be external to the casing CR that defines the chamber CH, as is shown in
It will also be noted that when the motor vehicle comprises two wheelsets, each of them may be equipped with an anti-roll device DA according to the invention.
The invention has numerous advantages, including:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1758458 | Sep 2017 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2018/052106 | 8/27/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/053351 | 3/21/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4805929 | Shibata | Feb 1989 | A |
5230529 | Harvey-Bailey | Jul 1993 | A |
5630623 | Ganzel | May 1997 | A |
5788031 | Saito | Aug 1998 | A |
6179310 | Clare | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6520510 | Germain | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7162945 | Tatsuya | Jan 2007 | B2 |
8167319 | Ogawa | May 2012 | B2 |
20060290079 | Smay | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070108707 | Kobayashi | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2786133 | May 2000 | FR |
S6340214 | Mar 1988 | JP |
S6364813 | Mar 1988 | JP |
H0234302 | Mar 1990 | JP |
H0263914 | Mar 1990 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/FR2018/052106 dated Dec. 11, 2018. |
Written Opinion for PCT/FR2018/052106 dated Dec. 11, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200269649 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |